Scientists Revive Worms from THOUSANDS of Years Ago?

Recently, scientists have supposedly revived roundworms from many thousands of years ago. In this episode of Answers News, our hosts Dr. Georgia Purdom, Jessica Jaworski, and Rob Webb share their perspectives on this topic as Bible-believing Christians.
Subscribe to us for more biblical content every week.
“And God made the beasts of the earth according to their kinds and the livestock according to their kinds, and everything that creeps on the ground according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.” (Genesis 1:25 ESV)
0:00 - Scientists Revive 46,000-Year-Old Roundworms From Siberian Permafrost
www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-...
3:43 - Our Universe wasn’t empty, even before the Big Bang
bigthink.com/starts-with-a-ba...
8:51 - Households with at least 2 faiths are growing, census shows
www.christianpost.com/news/ho...
12:55 - Most family breakdowns aren’t due to couples divorcing: study
www.christianpost.com/news/mo...
17:08 - Gloomy climate calculation: Scientists predict a collapse of the Atlantic ocean current to happen mid-century
www.sciencedaily.com/releases...
22:14 - Neil DeGrasse Tyson says biology is insufficient at explaining gender ideology - and teen detransition activist Chloe Cole rips his claims
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...
26:41 - A colossal ancient whale could be the heaviest animal ever known
www.sciencenews.org/article/c...
28:28 - Ark Encounter tops list of most popular attractions in Kentucky
www.christianpost.com/news/ar...

[@USAShooting27]

My wife and I just visited the Ark and Creation Museum two weeks ago! Both are incredible experiences and worth your while!

[@Number4lead]

​@@LordMathioustriggered 😂😂

[@jamesb5864]

@LordMathious make sure you wear two masks and represent the Royal Society.

[@iancampbell2295]

You just wasted your money then😅

[@WCove99]

Was it ALL proven, unbiased science? I am Christian but I don't understand the logic behind their "science" outside of the Bible.

[@stevelawrence8352]

I sooo want to go to the Ark Encounter and Creation Museum. I'd love to have my family's next reunion there.

[@DanielWortley-ip6pd]

Evolution makes more questions then answers

[@captivedesk3168]

What does the theory of evolution state that isnt clear?

[@parkosterwich7274]

​​@@captivedesk3168so you admit it's a theory. No in transition species. Spiral galaxys , no macro evolution precidents and a host of others. Evolution believers are religious nuts

[@Flagrum3]

@@captivedesk3168 Its not a theory, its an hypothesis. Theories require some sort of fact. And to answer your question to DanielWortley-ip6pd...Everything. There is no scientific factual evidence for any claim in evolution, only assertions and pipe dreams.

[@globalcoupledances]

Ask a question and I try to give you an answer.

[@parkosterwich7274]

@@globalcoupledances name one example of a macro evolution and not a micro one. Also in transition species where are they if this been going on so long

[@josephreigens3090]

I have been to the Ark encounter and Creation museum 2 times and can't wait to go back again. Thank you AIG for all that you do. God bless!!!!

[@Denis-lp3pz]

Congratulations guys! I'm glad you've been ranked so high by the state. Please, keep carrying the torch of truth. God bless you.

[@herozero5555]

Where's that torch?? -- and NO Truth here! Truth is what is universal - not myths and legends!

[@Denis-lp3pz]

@@herozero5555 no myths and legends indeed. Just the truth of the Bible and observational science. Observational science shows God's creation and leads to love. Darwinism tries to impose a hypothesis that we're just animals, and leads to egoism, racism, eugenics, and elevates the strong above the weak. It's a very depressing religion.

[@SK-bw2cv]

​@@herozero5555 Christianity and the bible is not a myth. Not sure if you've got the memo yet. By the way, here we are Christians. Did you know that? That means we believe the Bible to be true. You seem to be unaware of that fact.

[@herozero5555]

@@SK-bw2cv Oh, yeah, afraid that's the ONLY fact that's true. I've been around for some time, not born yesterday, well educated and not a pre-K child-- and was a former, 40 plus year believer. Be my guest if you want to nullify YOUR education.✔️ "Leave your brain behind to go to church!"🤪

[@HS-zk5nn]

I am so glad I am not an atheist anymore

[@DamianS1893]

God is good. Greatly appreciate AIG. God bless

[@rdr6269]

Great talk but I really wanted to hear more about the worms.

[@lauralowery9303]

How do they know there Was radiation before? Did someone tell them? Btw, I believe it is impossible to have Anything pre-historic. We have a document (bible) that covers all history!

[@el-duderino975]

​@@LordMathiousassume*

[@lauralowery9303]

@@LordMathious So you are a member of the evolutionist religion? I told myself not to respond to this kind of rhetoric. Jesus loves you so much, he died for you!

[@lauralowery9303]

@@LordMathious it's what you believe in, ergo it's your religion. Deep in your heart you know there is a God. I suppose one of 3 things: 1. You think you are God 2. You are angry with God. 3. You want to create your own God so you can do what you want without consequences. If you were to get pushed out of the plane without a parachute, you would cry out to God. Sadly it would be too late.

[@dontavious3772]

I am only 16 and I live in Australia but I would Absolutely LOVE to come and visit the ark encounter, I hope to see you all some day!

[@globalcoupledances]

Better go to the Sistine Chapel in Rome. Real art. Compare that with the Adam and Eve of the Ark

[@SK-bw2cv]

​@@LordMathiousdon't be jealous. 😅😅😅

[@SK-bw2cv]

​@@LordMathious are you unemployed or retired or something? How do you find so much time to come here and waste our time?

[@SK-bw2cv]

@@LordMathious don't be sad for me. I'm perfectly fine. 🤣🤣🤣

[@SK-bw2cv]

@@LordMathious I'm not the one who's going to be spending eternity in a hot, dark, desolate place. You should be more concerned about your own well being.

[@tartufo4870]

God bless you brothers and sisters 🙏. Well done 👏 ✔️ 👍 😃

[@lucillegriffin9428]

There are lots of things that can give an inaccurate reading in carbon dating !

[@captivedesk3168]

And those are known and accounted for and when its a relic from the holy land creationists all of a sudden accept dating methods

[@John-kj5wh]

Theyre not known. Theyre generally unknown, esp when we were in school they did not tell ppl that. The """holyland creationists""" as you called them, dont merely just ""accept it"" Its rather that it just reflects their propositions. And not yours....

[@John-kj5wh]

Creationists are like thee only ones who ever actually knew what C14 is and how they use it. Theyre not denying the validity of it.. theyre rather explaining thee ACTUAL half life results given. And it aint billions or even millions of years. So the evolutionists lie and say they know it came from the atmosphere, that C14 "regenerates"" NOT into the solid tight molecular structure, of a diamond, deep within the earth. They think WE dont understand this, but rather, the secular is the clueless one. Seculars already drank the kool aid, for WHAT reason in their mind would they have, to challenge these things and thus learn about them? Nothing. They tell themselves a lullaby, ""its been basically proven""" haha lets discuss it then.

[@Flagrum3]

@@captivedesk3168 How do you account for unknowns? Like was c14 in the atmosphere always the same? Most artifacts found in the holy land are dated mostly by pottery more then c14 dating as pottery dating is much more accurate.

[@captivedesk3168]

@@Flagrum3 It is not unknown ice core samples go back hundreds of thousands of years while carbon dating is used reliably back to about 50 thousand well inside the hundreds of thousands of years of trapped samples in ice cores, for one

[@kayleneemery8217]

Blessings and appreciation from Sydney Australia.

[@jaycos3]

Love this channel. Keep Tareing down the lies and half truths of this world.Nice Work my Brothers and sisters. God Bless.

[@elsaj9592]

I guess they have to admit now that resurrection is possible - As the old and new Testament said and showed many times. Unfortunately for them, they couldn't give the worms eternal life - the only One that can do that is Almighty God

[@dagwood64]

I wish I could see the Ark Encounter but I can barely afford to buy food to eat twice a day. If it's Gods will, it will happen.

[@AuthorJaymiMozeak]

Cool on your ranking on Trip Advisor. Congratulations!

[@zatara2124]

The volume on your channel is so low. It's not always super low but this episode and some others are really low compared to other channels.please see if this can be remedied

[@SK-bw2cv]

05:35 "they have the wrong basis for their foundation so they come to the wrong conclusions" I think a verse in the Bible puts it like this: "they are ever learning but never able to come to the knowledge of the truth."

[@dexterjeff27]

Why is it icant play this video? My net is fast and Other vids are ok but not this one, it keeps on buffering and not playing😢

[@DS-sf3fk]

Great collaboration!

[@whatlolawants2167]

Does that mean Pluto really is a planet?

[@lucillegriffin9428]

And what was the purpose of them reviving these round worms ?

[@garyradtke3252]

To pretend they are as powerful as God.

[@katawhampus9879]

They said it in the video. It is as a step to preserving human tissue and therefore human life. And to pretend you are as powerful as god is impossible; no human is as nonexistent as the perception of god is.

[@SK-bw2cv]

Always trust God's word first. First and foremost. God bless you AIG

[@abqbarbie]

Why shouldn't there have been a big bang when God said "light"?

[@born_again_torinos]

Next to Boulder City Nevada just outside of vegas, we have a dry lake that when it rains a lot, pre-flood creatures wake up and swim around.

[@edr.3229]

These people keep trying to play God and it will backfire in their faces!!!

[@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440]

No, they're doing quite well.

[@lauralowery9303]

I don't know how they can grow everything from nothing when I can't even grow dandelions! I am living in the only place on dry land that doesn't have dandelions! I should be able to grow them here in south Texas! Ergo, I will never be convinced that these evolution loonies can grow everything from nothing. I would make a big period but I don't know how. 😂😅 This is a really good video!

[@decal1751]

like this = ● 😂😂😅😊🤷🏻‍♂️

[@globalcoupledances]

Everything from nothing violates 1st Law of Thermodynamics

[@martinopper1523]

Excellent 👍

[@CR-yd4qe]

Can someone explain creations reason for the “recurrent laryngeal nerve”. Now evolution explains it but nothing else seems to.

[@KKing55]

maybe God was being Artistic

[@CR-yd4qe]

@@KKing55 Or Autistic 🧐

[@katawhampus9879]

I think you mean autistic

[@auntybiblebeliever887]

Oh amazing, I never knew that was a thing. My initial thought is animals and man when not in this fallen state could communicate in the Garden of Eden. During the Millennium this will happen again when everything is at peace. The Bible says even the trees will clap their hands and the hills break out in song. I haven't done scientific study or anything (doesn't matter to me anyways) but wow, makes good sense Biblically. When at peace and perfect, all things communicate. When in a fallen state we kill or harm instead. Satan even tries to counterfeit this with all the data, sensors and cameras.

[@CR-yd4qe]

@@auntybiblebeliever887 my my what a chatterbox! Lot of content not much context. I doubt your an exponent of lateral thinking 🤔

[@roblangsdorf8758]

One carbon 14 assumption is that that carbon 14 has always been created by cosmic rays striking nitrogen atoms at a constant rate for millions of years. But if carbon 14 has only been going through this process for a few thousand years, how long did it take to get up to the current level? If the earth's magnetic field has a half life of less than 1500 years, how has this impacted the amount of carbon 14 in existence a few thousand years ago? (With a higher magnetic field, wouldn't fewer cosmic rays reach the earth's atmosphere?) What impact would this have had on carbon 14 creation? Could these factors account for dates of 40,000 to 60,000 years for the age of coal? Lots of science that still needs to be done.

[@roblangsdorf8758]

@@LordMathious There is plenty of real science that makes it clear that the earth couldn't possibly be that old. One thing that was discovered about 25 years ago is that the earth's magnetic has a half life of less than 1500 years. This means that the magnetic field 1500 years ago was 2 times what it is now; 3000 years ago was 4 times greater than now; etc. If you continue to project this back you discover that the magnetic field would have been too great a few 10s of thousands of years ago for life to exist on the earth. Less than 100,000 years ago the magnetic field would have been great enough to disrupt the surface of the earth. So that say 4.56 billions years is impossible. Siltation rates provide a maximum age of less than 60,000 years to lay down the current amount of silt in the oceans. Then study the rate that the moon is moving away from the earth. This also tells us that the world couldn't be more than a billion or so years. All of this points to a younger earth than standard geology pushes.

[@globalcoupledances]

@roblangsdorf8758 - "magnetic fields"? Where did you read that? Age of the earth was calculated by radiometric dating

[@roblangsdorf8758]

@tjd712 Check out the RATE project that reported on various problems with radiometric dating in 2005. Also, look into the radiometric dating of various volcanoes that have erupted in the past century. We know when the volcanic activity took place, but the resultant rocks date as being hundreds to thousands of years old. Remember that an old geology saying is that the present is the key to the past. It is time to unlock reality.

[@globalcoupledances]

@roblangsdorf8758 - RATE project is from ICR! And Volcanic Bombs is the explanation

[@jamesb5864]

@roblangsdorf8758 These guys like tv and royal society mental institutions. No need for talking down about their priests and sacred texts. This is the religion of royal society freemasonry for the most debased minds, and they think it's an education.

[@isaiahhoward1997]

My main issue is that I can not discern who I am dealing with and what denominations I could be strengthening by being cooperative with expressed tyranny from these people it’s seriously hard to listen to what is being said without thinking about possible visible church harm ramifications, I’m not sure if there are a lot of lone wolf type Christians associated with this place, I need to say there are far from the truth churches that do need discouragement, there are close to the truth churches that this country needs to increase quickly and largely, if you aren’t physically going to a church you at least need to be regularly interactive with one online, one is probably generally ideal, I have been interactive with two of them somewhat regularly personally, I would have to suggest reformation church of shelbyville, northwest baptist church, Christ church of Moscow, sovereign king church, and apologia studios. We should sing the psalms. Allow movement.

[@garyradtke3252]

The way I think of the accuracy of carbon dating is like parallel lines. With our best possible precision measuring of the distance between the two lines say for 100 miles they are so close in measurement between them at each end we can't be any more accurate but there is a difference. Now you run those lines out one million miles and you could probably measure the difference in width with a yard stick or even something larger. Time and the unknowns affect things we couldn't and will never be able to account for so we have no way of knowing the true inaccuracy of carbon dating. Just think about the simple things in the here and now they find out they are wrong about and change their minds about. People lived on butter and eggs for thousands of years then they where going to kill us then they are good for us. This is our fickle science.

[@alanwolf9542]

Hey all things are possible. It's a miracle Wonder if the metrroite exploited over Syberis had anything to do with this miraclious event. Old worms coming back to life

[@DanielWortley-ip6pd]

I believe dinosaur started as dinosaur and stayed as dinosaur

[@globalcoupledances]

Yes human started as human, as Hominid, as Primate, as Mammal, as Vertebrate, as Animalia, as Eukaryote and stays being them

[@HS-zk5nn]

indeed

[@HS-zk5nn]

@@globalcoupledances nah, just you

[@ernestfinch1578]

UNBELIEVABLE !

[@SK-bw2cv]

05:55 "God spoke everything into existence. There is no big bang." Genesis 1; John 1:1-3

[@phearlesspharaoh3697]

It never ceases to amaze me how people read an article like that and take it as “science”. Always look at the title of the person writing it. Many times their title is “theoretical physicist” etc… key word. “Theoretical “

[@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440]

It is apparent that you are unsure of how theoretical physics functions.

[@hglundahl]

1:44 Rob Web pun count. 1 so far.

[@supermanziggy]

Evolution? A fairy tale for adults.

[@katawhampus9879]

The bible? A fairy tale for uneducated adults. And yours is complete with magic, so you tell me which is more accurate.

[@HS-zk5nn]

pretty mich

[@jasonleske430]

I have a climate model i would like to see compared to biblical teaching - the Glysberg Cycle. Does not follow environmental alarmist rhetoric. But claims 1500 years historical support. Very interested if it is also supported with biblical history and reason modern media not giving it (cyclical patterns of nature God created into nature) any attention.

[@FBCTrona]

If Space is absolutely empty then is it even space?

[@cs5250]

The emptiness of space is simply the existence of nothing

[@FBCTrona]

@@cs5250 where nothing exists, except nothing? 😁

[@TickedOffPriest]

Congratulations!

[@Steve-dg3md]

The big bang THEARY IS AN IDEA CREATED BY MAN WHO HASN'T EVEN EXPLORED HIS OWN GALAXY... I WILL PUT MY FAITH IN OUR INFINATE GOD.😊

[@KingYayito]

Love what yall are doing but need music

[@hglundahl]

2:41 My assumptions about radio-carbon: * its halflife can actually be tested. 100 years is a significant fraction of 5730 years. * the sample usually depends pretty much on the atmosphere, which is _one_ sample which does not change C14 content all that rapidly. * this means there is a delay in changes of pmC (percent modern Carbon [14 ratio to Carbon 12]) * thanks to this delay one actually can make fairly valid assumptions about C14 in the past, as far back as there is historical material to date it against * the Flood is historical, and my so far best way of getting at the Flood year in carbon dates is the tephra from Megavolcano Campi Flegrei, tephra means wood and grass and bushes and animals and people which were burned to ashes in lava flow, and so tephra, unlike lava, contains organic or formerly organic carbon, and it dates to 39 000 BP (my previous best way was : no Neanderthal or Denisovan dated to later than 40 000 BP). I think this is a fairly sound and a fairly Christian set of assumptions. I don't see any point at which it would conflict with any Biblical text, apart from a _very_ maximalising reading of Genesis 6:7, and forgetting that all Neanderthals and Denisovans we have found were _below_ the face of the earth, _not on it_ ... (but this won't find any grace with Anne Habermehl, I've corresponded with her ...)

[@silent1967]

Lots of strange things happening in Peru.

[@therabidpancake1]

I just realized the word prehistoric is a contradiction . The word prehistoric would mean before history that does not make sense .

[@globalcoupledances]

history is based on manuscripts. Dinosaurs could not write

[@hglundahl]

2:34 Vegetation _carbon dated_ 46 000 years? As the carbon date for the Flood year is 39 000 BP / 37 000 BC, this means the find is a pre-Flood one, unless there is a reservoir effect.

[@hglundahl]

@@LordMathious except it was evidenced both in tradition and in buried things

[@hglundahl]

in tradition,@@LordMathious : Hebrew tradition, as per Bible, Greek tradition, Babylonian tradition, Hindu tradition. In things buried : tephra from Campi Flegrei, carbon dates to 39 000 BP, which is also the limit for any actual body parts from Neanderthals or Denisovans, which makes sense if they were pre-Flood races. That was five pieces of evidence ...

[@hglundahl]

2:48 _"one ice age occurred, and it occurred after the Flood, so they have to be less than 4500 years old"_ The cryptobiosis would suggest ice age. But it's the plant material, not the revived worms, that have been carbon dated. So, putting by the way the Flood at 2957 BC, as per a LXX chronology calculated by St. Jerome, while the worms would be younger than 5000 years, the plant material would be older. Or, if both are younger, then there was a reservoir effect, but not sure if that works for plant material.

[@hglundahl]

It's also possible the revived worms went into cryptobiosis _much_ later, somehow getting down through cracks in the permafrost. The revived worms obviously ingested present day plant material after revival and can't be used for carbon testing their age relative to plant material.

[@tylerhamilton3384]

The highlight title never matches up to what the content is. Why....,?

[@donquihote6023]

Even Church Women enjoy the Courts. I once believed in Marriage, was a Follower..... and etc...

[@noneyabidness9644]

We don't have the skull, or the flippers, but we know it looked like a land animal, but lived in the ocean? 😂🤣🤣😂

[@Quaunta]

God does not change. So when in Genesis Chapter two, “At the time when the Lord God made the earth and the heavens while there was no field shrub on earth and no grass of the field had sprouted, for the LORD God had sent no rain upon the earth and there was no man to till the soil........7 The LORD God formed man out of the clay of the ground and blew into his nostrils the breath of life, and so man became a living being. 8 Then the LORD God planted a garden in Eden in the east and placed there the man whom he had formed. 9 Out of the ground the LORD God made various trees to grow that were delightful to look at and good for food, with the tree of life in the middle of the garden and the tree of the knowledge of good and bad...... and there he brought the man all the animals that he created to see what the man would call him. Except the most subtle animal in the midst of the garden that serpent of old, Lucifer, the devil, he hid in the growing grass and before he could see it God knocked out Adam and took a rib out and made Eve because Adam did not find a help mate in the animals nor this most subtle of creatures. Why Adam did not take from the humans God created on the sixth day (He should have read Chapter 1) in the image of god created he them male and female. Oops God does not change and cannot lie and DID not tell Adam that he would become like the gods knowing good and evil, if he ate the fruit of the Tree of the knowledge of “Good and Bad” no let the subtle guy do that, to EVE! Why didn't God talk to Eve and tell her this creature would tempt her with those words watch out for him! She only had the word of Adam and the subtle creature who knew more then Eve, why did he/it that subtle creature know more about the Garden and the tree of the knowledge of good and Evil, then Adam and Eve. Wow! I don't know about those who do not believe in God or the Devil, but it looks like there was a lot of information these one day old humans just did not know, UGH! That serpent mislead (he sinned first) Eve to believing she would not die if she ate from the tree then Eve sinned took it to Adam and he took it and sinned. The Bible may be a word of the gods written by men but here in the first two chapters of the Bible there are two creation stories about two “Adams” one referring to “them” and Adam referring to one man. Fix this before you criticize those who get confused over the message you claim to have from these multiple versions of the beginning of the gospel. You have much to answer for!

[@rofishy2]

He says it’s a bad idea!

[@anthonyhamilton7671]

Regarding the gender fluidity, these people are literally arguing that physical reality can be materially changed by the machinations of the human mind even though the absence of evidence in reality affirming this idea screams at them that this is not possible. However, they fail to take this ideology to its full conclusion. For example, if I wake up feeling like somebody else’s property is now mine, according to this new revelation, I should be able to go and take it to myself without any objection. Isn’t this what small children absent of full understanding do sometimes, and yet for some crazy reason, those of us with sense, correct them. To suggest that reality is not actually reality is literally insane.

[@PowerfulChoices]

There are excellent Biblical, astronomical, and geologic reasons for dating the beginning of the Siberian permafrost to the late fall or winter of 699/698 BCE. Also, I'd love to see a study of the corresponding 'Breakdowns of the Family vs Weddings before our Creator and Wedding Witnesses alone'. That is, without consenting to submitting the new family under the jurisdiction of any State created by man. That is, by either asking the State's permission for getting married or by registering a marriage under the jurisdiction of a State of man. Wouldn't that be much more in harmony with the Bible?

[@2besavedcom-7]

Timestamp - 9:30 -Interesting that Acts 4:12 is quoted when NO ONE had heard of "Jesus" till the late 17th century! "And she shall bring forth a son, and you shalt call his name YAHSHUA*: for He shall save His people from their sins." (Matt 1:21) *The given HEBREW Name of the Messiah literally Yah (Yahweh) shua (is salvation).

[@0animalproductworld558]

Isaiah 11:6-9

[@joshuakohlmann9731]

This rather blows the idea of a 6000-year-old earth out of the water, doesn't it?

[@lieutenantnomad9198]

Not necessarily. Why would you think that?

[@CRUCIFi777]

Some men may be running rampant, but there are a few that forgo thinking of marriage because the vast majority of what they see are representations of radical feminism.

[@MistbornPrincess]

Another reason people don’t marry, at least in the US, is financial penalties the govt puts on married couples.

[@lxlx3458]

🏳️✝️🙏🕎

[@garyjaensch7143]

I think it’s disappointing that answers in Genesis Canada has video regarding flat earth beliefs, that gives air to writers whose religion believes in evolution, and according to Michael J Oard , the same religion even taught the piltdown man fraud to him at school .

[@KenJackson_US]

If they really do, then yes, that's disappointing or disgusting. But I'm very skeptical that they do.

[@chuckmaddison2924]

That wasn't hard. We did this year's ago In school.

[@indyj16]

I love how secularists are always predicting the end of the world in just a few years. 😆

[@SkyfallenVT]

What secularist are predicting the end of the world? Jesus preached about the end of the world and we can see how that turned out. The majority of apocalyptic idea come from religious ideologies. Your friendly atheist ~Sky~

[@franciscodelgado6884]

Science tists......get serious,,,, I wonder if they ask the worms how Old they were

[@globalcoupledances]

AiG, you have a new ally: Richard Dawkins also accused of being transphobic

[@HS-zk5nn]

nobody is scared of them 🤣🤣

[@davidhandyman7571]

So, the universe was empty before the big bang, but it wasn't empty. What drugs were the authors on?

[@toosiyabrandt8676]

Hi Also if time DOES go back millions of years, THERE WOULD BE NO RADIO CARBON 14 left anymore, to date things! Shalom to us only in Christ Yeshua returning soon to reign over His Creation from Jerusalem forever.

[@pkendlers]

Scientists got worms lol

[@davidstidolph4472]

How can they understand the bible so well about creation and many bible subjects and not see that Sunday isn't the day of rest but Saturday Sabbath is the biblical day of rest. REMEMBER THE SABBATH DAYS Saturday. For 330 after Jesus The Sabbath was Saturday not Sunday and it was not until Constantine changed it slowly to Sunday that the Bible never changed the Sabbath from Saturday Sabbath to Sunday secular day

[@globalcoupledances]

Early Christians moved it to Sunday because of the Resurrection

[@danieladkins5242]

How do non Catholics not believe in the Holy Eucharist? Christ literally teaches this in the Bible. My point is, people believe what they will

[@radianthaze5332]

This is very true. I believe AIG would be blameless in their work if they started following the 4th Commandment! I hope they come to truth.

[@DS-sf3fk]

Love the jokes!!

[@HyzerFlexOnYou]

These conspiracy theorists are on the same level as flat earthers

[@surrenderdaily333]

Who in their right mind or what kind of person wakes up EVERY morning thinking about what gender they feel like that day???

[@CornerstoneMinistry316]

Thousands sure...as long as they are up to 6K years ago

[@greg33033]

computer climate models, GIGO, garbage in garbage out. since the 70's all the doom and gloomers have been WRONG! ndt, feelings, nothing more than feelings. congrats on top visit list. can't wait to get there myself.

[@isaiahhoward1997]

I’m curious what denominations everyone associated with this business is affiliated with, we need to try not to be far from the truth. Support for this business can’t be reasonably justified from my perspective if owners/authorities/employees are primarily affiliated with far from the truth churches, it would effectively make this seem like a far from the truth Christian business that could need abandonment for close to the truth Christian businesses, I don’t prefer this business would be abandoned, but if there is primarily affiliation with far from the truth churches it would effectively increase in seeming like my preference here should be disregarded by me at least, if this business were not trying to seem christian it would seem far less necessary to be kind of difficult in relation to affiliated denominations, but as far as I can tell this business is trying to seem christian and that certainly is allowed, while maintaining being far from the truth would need discouragement in this place for sure in relation to these people and also people who might like to visit this business.

[@MichaelMeridius]

Why can't any christian demonstrate the existence of their supposed god's existence, why do they all fail in their burden of proof?

[@lieutenantnomad9198]

The heavens declare the glory of God.

[@MichaelMeridius]

@@lieutenantnomad9198 Prove it ....

[@captanblue]

I believe in the big bang, as an an explosion of creation from God.

[@parkosterwich7274]

Nope. Keep dreaming

[@SkyfallenVT]

The Big Bang wasn’t an explosion. It was an expansion of a singularity. Your friendly atheist ~Sky~

[@user-jr8rg1ue6i]

​@@SkyfallenVToh , well what's a " singularity " and what created the " singularity " ?????

[@parkosterwich7274]

@@SkyfallenVT you wish you were an atheist cause then you can use they fake excuses it produces. You're simply a creation worshipping uneducated luciferian not even an enlightened one but the lowest puppet kind

[@captanblue]

@@SkyfallenVT It was am event of rapid creation from nothing, an "explosion" of sorts.

[@raylenewinkelman8921]

Lol

[@Juan-hd8lh]

So, the numbers in the Bible are not spiritual symbols? They're scientific (in the modern sense of the word)? And then, all sciences based on any numbers outside of the Bible are simply false? Doesn't sound like Jesus to me, or even Moses, for that matter.

[@freeholdification]

Your comment doesn’t make sense

[@Juan-hd8lh]

@@freeholdification You can't see the rainbow of you look towards the Sun. You must look against it. Meaning, the numbers in the Bible are not used in the same manner we use them in scientific studying nowadays. They are symbols of spiritual (internal) processes, with multidimensional meanings and a specific order in the spiritual life and world. Moses was a scientist, but in the ancient sense of the word. When you realize the Genesis speaks as much about the human body and nervous system, you'll realize it is a map of your soul. Only the external layer is scientific, there is a more profound truth behind all which science is blind to even notice (and by the way, the rainbow reference in Genesis represents the 7 Spirits of God, who are the same 7 Churches of Asia Minor in Revelation, which in turn are the 7 chakras of Hinduism, the original Tower of Babel which without God's guidance will fall). PD: Even if this doesn't make sense, I believe in you, and that you'll make sense of it if you continue searching for God's guidance when reading the Bible and the Word made Human.

[@markminor70]

I love the Bible but you humans time line is messed up Father's time is not the same as ours.

[@noneyabidness9644]

Their DNA couldn't survive 40k years.

[@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440]

No, the DNA was preserved.

[@noneyabidness9644]

@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 sorry, not how that works. DNA has a half life wherein even in a pristine environment, it still cannot be maintained. Nuclear decay cannot be stopped. The half life of DNA is 521 years.

[@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440]

@@noneyabidness9644 Sorry, but you're clearly misunderstanding the idea of "half-life". The half-life of DNA is indeed 521 years, which means that half of the DNA is degraded, leaving half of the original amount of DNA behind. Now, since you're left with 50% of the original amount of DNA, in the next 521 years, ½ of that remaining DNA will be degraded, leaving you with 25% of the original amount. Thus, DNA can actually last for about 6.8 million years, where you only have trace amounts of DNA whose glycosidic linkages cannot be measured or evaluated. As such, their DNA can certainly be preserved for over 46,000 years.

[@noneyabidness9644]

@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 apparently you're poor at math. After 20k years, 0.00000000004% of the starting DNA would be left, or....in a human (far more base pairs than a worm) there'd be not a nucleotide left. (A halving of 90 times, in this case. Run those numbers, if you like. 4.0e-26)

[@noneyabidness9644]

@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 and question, since we cannot even prove there has been 46k years, but we have directly measured the half life of DNA, what mak s you think any DNA can be preserved for millions of years? Ahhh, your faith. Sorry, but faith isn't science. 😏

[@TheElizabethashby]

WORM LIARS LOL THE EARTH IS AROUND 6000YRS OLD

[@DeeegerD]

Your dating of the earth is way way off. In Genesis it states that the world was void. The proper translation (Check your Strongs Concordance) is the world became void. Man's world is thousands of years old, the Earth is far older.

[@2besavedcom-7]

The Hebrew is clear. The word היתה (haitah) literally means "came to be" or "came to exist." To believe that there was thousands of years of death, disease and suffering prior to a "very good" creation is simply denying the good Creator and the work of His Son, Yahshua who came to remove all sin.

[@suebee1436]

Cant wait til they revive something else.......that theyll regret.......

[@cs5250]

It is easier to fool someone than to convice them they are wrong. Everyone reading the bible is just reading fallacies and old stories of the past. Humans 2,000 years ago could not have accurately judged the age of the Earth as much as we can today.

[@robocop4209]

Yep.....these people are insane

[@incrediblystupid8483]

Immediately the 'humor';!~ You are not appealing, just the facts. Good bye.

[@HyzerFlexOnYou]

How could someone call themselves a scientist and in the same breath say you need to start with the bible as truth?

[@HS-zk5nn]

Nicaragua is the greatest country in the world!

[@WCove99]

Do you "scientists" prove Creation outside of using the Bible? I am a Christian and believe in Creation but the Bible doesn't explain biology or science thoroughly. I read that your "proof" of Creation defied the law of physics. Do you hate science or just the parts you disagree with? We Christians need to be stronger than only using the Bible in arguments when too many don't believe in it and refuse to hear about it. Seeing your parents' divorce makes you want marriage less often. If you don't see it modeled right, the alternative seems better. Also, what about abusive and child marriages? Nonetheless, I agree completely on gender ideology.

[@marthaj67]

The Bible isn't a science textbook. It wasn't written for us to "prove" biology. It is the WORD of God and was given to us to know God and to be saved from His wrath. If you think you need to go to outside (read: secular) sources to prove whatever the "science" currently says, you don't believe in the Creator and Sustainer of everything with all your heart, mind, soul, and strength. God never tells us to PROVE ANYTHING. You seem like a person who's had bad experiences for which you blame God. Guess what? _We've all had bad experiences,_ but the mature in Christ _learn_ from them; we learn to TRUST in our Creator and His plan for us instead of blaming Him and leaving condescending comments on KZbin videos. Perhaps you should search yourself to make sure you truly are in the Faith.

[@WCove99]

Stupid You Tube seems to have blocked the reply someone posted.

[@globalcoupledances]

@katedev82 - possible only seen if sorted on newest first. Unclear why they are not seen is sorted on top comments

[@WCove99]

@tjd712 Can't choose that for my own comment. Some said something about what I said, and I can't see it.

[@globalcoupledances]

@@WCove99 @marthaj67 wrote: The Bible isn't a science textbook. It wasn't written for us to "prove" biology. It is the WORD of God and was given to us to know God and to be saved from His wrath. If you think you need to go to outside (read: secular) sources to prove whatever the "science" currently says, you don't believe in the Creator and Sustainer of everything with all your heart, mind, soul, and strength. God never tells us to PROVE ANYTHING. You seem like a person who's had bad experiences for which you blame God. Guess what? We've all had bad experiences, but the mature in Christ learn from them; we learn to TRUST in our Creator and His plan for us instead of blaming Him and leaving condescending comments on KZbin videos. Perhaps you should search yourself to make sure you truly are in the Faith.

[@iancampbell2295]

Mmm ok , deleting my comments. The dates were worked out because of the depth they drilled down. Answers in Genesis radiometric dating doesn't work because you purposely used the wrong techniques to get an obscured result , new dating is 99.9% accurate! So if you have to bend the truth to get the results you want ,I'd call that lying!

[@Flagrum3]

Only one "bending the truth" is you. The carbon 14 dating of vegetation around the find was from the original secular article. You can't date things by depth, where did you get that nonsense? No dating is 99.9% accurate, that is a blatant and ignorant lie. Most dating methods use, at their base, and in their calculations certain assumptions, and assumptions are not scientific. Grow up.

[@Flagrum3]

@@LordMathious Thats right. If you think assumptions are scientific, I'd suggest you get some schooling on what the scientific method involves. i.e. Educate yourself.

[@jamesb5864]

@LordMathious you're so freaking funny you think you're intelligent its great. I love reading your comments here.

[@jamesb5864]

@LordMathious I commented on another area. I actually comment because I care about you. Maybe you're on this channel for a reason. Do they get everything right? Probably not. But to think the institutions at the helm today are being honest with you when I know their religion and their goals of technological transcendence to achieve their alchemical goals that go back to Satan's first promise in the garden... the Satanists the run the world, the Vatican, the nation's, etc... they believe this. To me its like a comedy act watching you try to defend their talking points.

[@jamesb5864]

@LordMathious you can claim they are backed by evidence just like you can claim the vaccine was 99 percent effective and 3 masks kept you alive. I'm not going to have a back and forth about what you believe to be fact based evidence when you believe everyone on "your side" has altruistic intentions when that categorizes you in the realm of arguing with a small child who wasn't born long ago. If you can't look at the source of your beliefs you are not educated. The royal society (primarily) rules the majority of your imagination and you know next to nothing about them I assure you.

[@isaiahhoward1997]

Self righteous tyranny to elevate this business noted. I would prefer to justify visiting this business someday. At this exact time I do not consider it intelligent.

[@PortmanRd]

Oh right! Because the bible says so. 😂

[@albusdumbledore219]

Here’s what the Bible doesn’t say: Satan is going around the USA collecting souls. The world is controlled by Satan and his followers. Heaven and hell are real and eternal. Choose wisely 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

[@iancampbell2295]

How to prove the bible is wrong. Light ! The light from the sun takes 8 minutes to reach earth. Light from the nearest star takes 330 years to reach earth , thats travelling at the speed of light. Therefore if a star is 13 billion light years away ,that means its 13 billion years old. Please, one of you , explain your 6 thousand years considering that this is based on Einsteins theories as well as photographic proof.

[@elfhelmp]

You can only assume that speed of light. Because you have to measure it in two points and that is the speed with which electricity runs through the wires used to measure light. But NOBODY ever measured light in a single point and said "yes this is how fast it goes". So your assumptions are just that. My assumptions say that light travels at infinite speed. And we don't have yet devices that can measure it.

[@iancampbell2295]

@@elfhelmp and you've just proved you know absolutely nothing. NASA's James Webb Telescope is taking photographs of galaxy's dating over 13.5 billion years old. How do they know this? Because of red shift! That form if light reduces its wavelength over time , and this can definitely be measured! Why do you think the Telescope is equipped with a device for this very purpose! Or maybe NASA doesn't know what they're doing.

[@speedster427]

Light years are a measure of distance, not time. Looking into the sky is not looking into the "past" any more than looking into the future. If sky was a timeline, then turning your head 180° would be showing you the future.

[@iancampbell2295]

@@speedster427 light years are the distance it takes light to travel one year! It is almost 300 000 000 m/s. Therefore if something has been travelling for 1 billion light years and we just see it ,that light started 1 billion years ago. As far as your stupid assumption that light could travel past you, if that was the case , you wouldn't see it in the first place. It travels in straight lines , so if you've seen it , it was directed straight at you. How could it possibly pass you ?

[@globalcoupledances]

Speed of light in vacuum is a constant. Otherwise violation of 1st Law of Thermodynamics in formula E = mc2

[@brandonpemberton5707]

Yeah, more worms. Also you need ro acknowledge that men dont want to be married because men have almost 0 legal protection in our country today from their wives.👀

[@sulktheredpanda]

I clicked on this video expecting actual science, but then I heard the words "biblical worldview", and saw that it was an AiG video. How dare you clickbait us!

[@user-xs2ln9fv7l]

The fact that you mock the nothing created everything, when you believe that god spoke everything into existence. The reason that science changes, is that new information requires new answers. God did not create anything, the bible is a book of fiction, and nothing in it is anything than mythology.

[@tobieaina]

Do you have a source or evidence for the claims you just made?

[@user-xs2ln9fv7l]

@@tobieaina Yes, that is how science works.