Mercury Shouldn't Be Liquid. But It Is.

  Рет қаралды 1,306,829

SciShow

SciShow

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 1 800
@galliumgames3962
@galliumgames3962 10 ай бұрын
If mercury had a higher boiling point, it would be FAR safer to play with. Mercury metal is closer to a noble metal than not and in of itself is much lower toxicity as an elemental material. However, its vapor pressure is high enough to not be negligible and the vapor is extraordinarily toxic as it has essentially unlimited surface area to do no no chemistry in your body when inhaled. Edit: Liquid mercury in its own context should probably still be considered at some level of hazard as very small amounts (Generally considered negligible in most circumstances fortunately.) can be absorbed in the GI system and the beads can finely divide and get stuck in crevices such as your fingernails, as well as internally if swallowed. Metals such as gold and platinum are also pretty toxic outside their metallic forms, but do not have the same problems of producing vapor or being a mobile liquid at room temperature. If you do intend on playing with mercury, do so in a ventilated area, account for any possible escaping material and wear gloves, or at least throughly wash your hands after handling. Spilt mercury can get into cracks in furniture, walls and the floor and will take years to evaporate. The vapor pressure of mercury at room temperature is 0.25 Pa and this is 200x the maximum permissible 8hr exposure levels by OSHA. Mercury vapor can build up to toxic levels from spills in enclosed environments, this is why the fire department takes it so seriously.
@margodphd
@margodphd 10 ай бұрын
I wheezed at " no no chemistry". Since today, this is the new, improved title of my toxicology books 😂
@queefyg490
@queefyg490 10 ай бұрын
Liquid at room temp basically means there will always be vapor regardless if it's reached it's boiling point. Melting easily and boiling easily are basically due to the same thing although you still have to factor in polarity.
@bariumselenided5152
@bariumselenided5152 10 ай бұрын
"No no chemistry" will forever live in my mental dictionary now
@fukpoeslaw3613
@fukpoeslaw3613 10 ай бұрын
No chemistry?! What the fu... oh, 'no no' oh ok.
@galliumgames3962
@galliumgames3962 10 ай бұрын
@@queefyg490 Gallium is weird though, with an utterly massive liquid range and boiling point of 2,400°C. IIRC the vapor pressure of gallium at 30°C is so low that it’s a probability of there being a single atom as opposed to a definable pressure value.
@LeonMRr
@LeonMRr 10 ай бұрын
Another interesting application of SR to atomic orbitals is in the color of gold. Metals usually don't absorb the photons of visible light they receive, instead they are scattered elastically. But in gold, electrons are moving at around 0.5c so their "mass" is changed, which changes the energy required to excite them from one shell to another, and that change happens to make the gold atom absorb more blue light, turning gold yellow to us.
@McKaySavage
@McKaySavage 10 ай бұрын
That’s another cool example of SR in chemistry. Thanks for sharing!
@LuisAldamiz
@LuisAldamiz 10 ай бұрын
Interesting trivia.
@SeedlingNL
@SeedlingNL 10 ай бұрын
@@McKaySavage I think it's also the reason why higher elements become more and more unstable... those speedfreak electrons literally twist spacetime so much that the atom itself is being ripped apart... the Roche limit of subatomic scales...
@naverilllang
@naverilllang 10 ай бұрын
What about copper? It's a much lighter element
@MrHowzaa
@MrHowzaa 10 ай бұрын
i heard its red shifting the light.
@y_fam_goeglyd
@y_fam_goeglyd 10 ай бұрын
Funny how Einstein solved two "mercury" problems. This one, and the Mercury "glitch" in Newton's Theory of Gravity. Complete coincidence, I'm sure, but it's interesting to me at least.
@theheadone
@theheadone 10 ай бұрын
I was thinking this as well and I was surprised he didn't mention it considering he was a host on the former space scishow.
@icollectstories5702
@icollectstories5702 10 ай бұрын
Well, the other Mercury required General Relativity because Special Relativity just wasn't enough.😁
@carultch
@carultch 10 ай бұрын
It's probably a lot less of a coincidence than you think. The namesake of both Mercuries is the Roman messenger god, and the reason they both are named after him, is swiftness. Mercury the planet being the fastest moving planet in the sky, and mercury the element being the element that flows fast as a liquid at room temperature. They both have being fast for their class in common, that earned them both the same namesake, and it is their speeds that cause relativistic effects to come in to play.
@JarrodFrates
@JarrodFrates 10 ай бұрын
@@carultchThe planet Mercury doesn't move fast enough for relativistic effects to come into play. Its average orbital speed is about 47 km/sec. General relativity comes into play for Mercury's orbit because the Sun's gravity warps space enough to affect Mercury's orbital precession. Every planet, and indeed every body orbiting the Sun is affected in a similar way, just less strongly than Mercury. Edit: As a couple of people have pointed out, I mistakenly wrote special relativity when I meant general relativity. Thanks for the corrections.
@carultch
@carultch 10 ай бұрын
@@JarrodFrates Still, it moves fast precisely because it is in a position where the sun's gravitational distortion of spacetime, is enough for relativistic effects to come into play. You wouldn't expect Uranus to have anomalies in its orbit that were explained by relativistic effects instead of another planet, when its orbital anomalies were used as a clue to discover Neptune.
@Dommi8450
@Dommi8450 10 ай бұрын
I graduated in 1999 and subshells were not taught to me. I had to look up a different video that explained that it is introductory chemistry. It was a weird feeling that something so basic to younger kids/teens is completely new to me.
@ajchapeliere
@ajchapeliere 10 ай бұрын
I remember a game show based loosely around that situation. I also remember arguing with my grandma about how lightning works because the knowledge and information access in her school years were more limited. I also still get tripped up by the knowledge that plate tectonics wasn't scientific canon until the 1960's or so. It just seemed so.... "It is known" by the time I was learning it, but it's contemporary to the US civil rights movement. Perception of time is wild.
@qazsedcft2162
@qazsedcft2162 9 ай бұрын
I was in college around that time and it was definitely taught in the university intro chemistry class. In high school we only ever had the Bohr model simplified stuff.
@solconcordia4315
@solconcordia4315 9 ай бұрын
I was hardly taught about subshells, either, in the U.S.A. I think that our professors considered them as inaccurate and outdated concepts in deference to the boundary-condition-induced quantum numbers so we got the atomic orbitals expositions. I, however, was precocious so I had already learnt that from my Big Brother's collection of textbooks he had used. The Chemistry textbooks used the subshell models pretty effectively to explain chemical engagement between atoms. As I have a historical perspective, I tolerate thinking of electrons of atoms being packaged into subshells. After all, the Madelung (n+l) rule used by the Aufbauprinzip maps atomic subshells with electronic configurations' filling order pretty well (but not quite right all the way -- I'm not a chemist so I know anyway that I shouldn't trust my *historic* chemistry education 100%: trust *AND* verify.) Electrons are delocalized waves as well as like tiny hard nuts. It just depends upon the resolution with which one looks at the electrons. In superconductivity research for room-temperature ambient-temperature superconductors, electrons should be thought of as being delocalized waves (viz. Bloch waves) capable of being decomposed into Fourier series with a periodic coherence length that can extend its range to near infinity to achieve resonance.
@dreammaker9642
@dreammaker9642 8 ай бұрын
Took me to first or second year of uni to finally understand. Think is you aren’t taught the Heisenberg model or principle of uncertainty till then because the Borr model gets taught instead as it’s easier to understand and works for the purpose intended. To be fair skipping the borr model would make it hard to understand Heisenberg
@dreammaker9642
@dreammaker9642 8 ай бұрын
@@qazsedcft2162cause that’s all you needed. Bohr model is “wrong” but it works for the purpose intended and it’s easier to understand. I doubt you could easily understand the Heisenberg model if you don’t understand and work with the Bohr model. Unless you make the mistake of entering a organic chem class then it doesn’t really matter that much.
@martijn8491
@martijn8491 10 ай бұрын
Just wow! I have an MSc in Physics and it's just amazing how you were able to explain so much pretty complicated physics in such a short video without too many shortcuts and without missing some important nuances and while keeping it understandable for the general public. And I also learned something interesting and new. I watch all scishow videos, but I'm seriously impressed by the quality of this one!!!
@kathrynthomas6390
@kathrynthomas6390 10 ай бұрын
I'm a bio major and this one really actually felt intuitive!
@pencilpauli9442
@pencilpauli9442 10 ай бұрын
Even I could follow the explanation. Grade D "O" Level Physics (twice) ie failed twice to get the minimum C grade that is recognised as a pass.
@marckyle5895
@marckyle5895 10 ай бұрын
I was wishing I had science teachers like this.
@robertfitzjohn4755
@robertfitzjohn4755 10 ай бұрын
DPhil in Chemistry here, back in the 1980s. My reasearch involved the energy levels in uranium compounds (92 protons and electrons) so I'm familiar with d and f subshells and relativistic effects in the core orbitals, which I thought were explained well here. My work was primarily experimental and my theoretical model was just a simple one involving only the outer electrons, but since then people with powerful computers have done the relativistic calculations and come up with answers that explain the experimental results.
@pyrotas
@pyrotas 10 ай бұрын
If you have a degree in Physics you should know that mass does not change under Lorentz transformations but it is a scalar invariant and hence all this video makes no sense.
@pgc6290
@pgc6290 10 ай бұрын
The fact that you ask to 'recall' high school chemistry makes me feel really good.
@KingsleyIII
@KingsleyIII 10 ай бұрын
The Chinese guy who drank mercury thinking it would grant eternal life was _dead_ wrong.
@aamirrazak3467
@aamirrazak3467 10 ай бұрын
Yeah I’d imagine it didn’t work out well for him
@arya_1503_fancade
@arya_1503_fancade 10 ай бұрын
ba dum tsss
@VenThusiaist
@VenThusiaist 10 ай бұрын
literally
@anthonymotture
@anthonymotture 10 ай бұрын
Dead wong
@ppoad
@ppoad 10 ай бұрын
Or depending on his believes he may enter into the eternal life realm… 😂 so he could be right!
@andriypredmyrskyy7791
@andriypredmyrskyy7791 10 ай бұрын
I've been curious about this topic forever, and your scientific communication was so top notch I felt compelled to tell you about how good it is. Having undergrad under my belt helps a lot but this was really easy to understand.
@jessi411
@jessi411 10 ай бұрын
Started the video, got confused, Googled some things, kept playing the video, went back to Google... now my boyfriend and I are having heated discussions about how to visualize and understand the dimensions of the universe. 10/10 that's the sign of good educational content
@csvscs
@csvscs 10 ай бұрын
Healthy comment! 🎉
@Atticusdoesthings
@Atticusdoesthings 10 ай бұрын
I wish I had heated discussions about the universe with my partner
@neerajwa
@neerajwa 10 ай бұрын
Higher dimensions eh ... Talk to some Hilbert space dweller
@LuisAldamiz
@LuisAldamiz 10 ай бұрын
Best is to remove one spatial dimension (or two) in order to allow for the remaining axis to represent time.
@donwald3436
@donwald3436 10 ай бұрын
I'm jealous lol.
@BaronVonQuiply
@BaronVonQuiply 10 ай бұрын
Too hazardous to keep around, I've replaced all mine with quicksilver. **dies confused**
@thenexttangle8568
@thenexttangle8568 9 ай бұрын
It's another name for Mercury
@michaelhaywood8262
@michaelhaywood8262 9 ай бұрын
@@thenexttangle8568 I think BarononQuiply knows that His was a joke comment.
@thenexttangle8568
@thenexttangle8568 9 ай бұрын
@@michaelhaywood8262 oh My bad
@clipsdaily101
@clipsdaily101 10 ай бұрын
i grew up thinking there was nothing left to discover. Aristotle- "The more you know, the more you realize you don't know"
@aamirrazak3467
@aamirrazak3467 10 ай бұрын
Agreed seems like the more knowledge you acquire, the more questions you have
@dustind4694
@dustind4694 10 ай бұрын
Every question answered should lead to at least one more question unanswered, but typically two or more.
@markloveless1001
@markloveless1001 10 ай бұрын
Dunning-Kreuger, thy name is law.
@somebody-anonymous
@somebody-anonymous 10 ай бұрын
Also Aristotle: The velocity at which an object falls is proportional to its mass
@donhoverson6348
@donhoverson6348 10 ай бұрын
The puzzles of Dark matter and Dark Energy still loom pretty large. Likely I will never see those solved.
@thefaboo
@thefaboo 10 ай бұрын
"... the more massive they *measure you* to be..." Side-stepped a whole physicist flamewar there 😂
@robfut9954
@robfut9954 10 ай бұрын
Went over my head, please explain. Why is that controversial
@omgsrsly
@omgsrsly 10 ай бұрын
@@robfut9954 Because the mass is not increasing in reality, although it is used as the most common explanation.
@rtg_onefourtwoeightfiveseven
@rtg_onefourtwoeightfiveseven 9 ай бұрын
I was about to head to the comments section to be all "um acktchually" but I stopped because of that. Good save on his part.
@thefaboo
@thefaboo 9 ай бұрын
@@omgsrsly @robfut9954 and the flamewar part is that there are a lot of working physicists who prefer the original interpretation....
@AsmodeusMictian
@AsmodeusMictian 9 ай бұрын
@@thefaboo This will forever baffle me. Science is all about replacing old information that's discovered to be incorrect with new, *proven* information so that we as a species can progress in our understanding of the worlds around us. To just reject new information smacks more of religion than science to me. You don't arrange your theories to come into line with reality, you re-arrange reality to come into line with your beliefs. No thanks. Stopped that decades ago now :D
@dustind4694
@dustind4694 10 ай бұрын
"Let's start in the shallow end of the pool... Which I filled with **water**, not mercury" - Things you can absolutely expect science profs to say, both to reassure people and to bemoan the necessity of ethics.
@olmostgudinaf8100
@olmostgudinaf8100 10 ай бұрын
And cost. I have a hunch that a pool of mercury might be ever so slightly dearer than a pool of water.
@dustind4694
@dustind4694 10 ай бұрын
@@olmostgudinaf8100 One can assume that any science prof is going to be upset about the budget (this is a touch more reasonable than being annoyed you can't show off cool and dangerous things).
@samstromberg5593
@samstromberg5593 10 ай бұрын
Dearer? Does that word have a definition I don't know about or was that a typo?
@olmostgudinaf8100
@olmostgudinaf8100 10 ай бұрын
@@samstromberg5593 Not a typo, as any search engine can tell you.
@dustind4694
@dustind4694 10 ай бұрын
@@samstromberg5593 It's typically more of a British English thing (not exclusively), but much as something can be loved dearly, it can cost one dearly, or be sold dearly. A dearer price is high or expensive.
@kwokchuchan7793
@kwokchuchan7793 10 ай бұрын
As a PhD in Chemistry I understand why mercury is unreactive, but I didn't understand how relativitistic effect turned mercury into liquid. Now I understand. Thanks for your simple but excellent explanation!
@Atticus_Loves_Lacquer
@Atticus_Loves_Lacquer 10 ай бұрын
My grandmother once told me that they used to play with Mercury like sensory slime as kids ☠️☠️☠️
@donaldpetersen2382
@donaldpetersen2382 10 ай бұрын
You cant absorb it though your skin, nor will it leave any dangerous traces.
@Atticus_Loves_Lacquer
@Atticus_Loves_Lacquer 10 ай бұрын
@@donaldpetersen2382 quick skin exposure is one thing, but children playing with it unsupervised for hours on end I think that’s in unsafe territory based on the little but informative research I’ve done. 🫶
@Fazzel
@Fazzel 10 ай бұрын
When I was in 5th grade I was in safety patrol and another kid used mercury he got from his dad to keep his badge shiny.
@davemeise2192
@davemeise2192 10 ай бұрын
We used to play in it with our fingers during our science class. I remember how heavy it was when poured into the palm of your hand. Cool stuff!
@daizy7441
@daizy7441 10 ай бұрын
⁠@@donaldpetersen2382i mean, you usually can’t, but that doesn’t make it *safe*. it can get in through any minor, imperceptible cut or scrape not to mention room temperature mercury can evaporate slightly and that’ll really mess up your insides if you inhale it too much or too often
@jmackmcneill
@jmackmcneill 10 ай бұрын
4:19 I think of chemical reactivity as atoms being sociable and extroverted, but equally I understand having all your electron shells filled must be a very cosy and reassuring feeling.
@mikemondano3624
@mikemondano3624 10 ай бұрын
It's suffocating, actually. It makes one long for extinction in the wave function of a large, copper conductor.
@zdlax
@zdlax 10 ай бұрын
I think I read somewhere that another consequence of SR is gold having the color it does as opposed to a standard metallic color.
@Eden_Laika
@Eden_Laika 10 ай бұрын
Yep, SR shifts the absorption spectrum of gold down into the visible spectrum, meaning it absorbs blue light but reflects red and green light giving it its yellow colour. The details are complicated but have to do with SR effects chaging the resonance frequency of the outer valence electrons.
@stevesmith2044
@stevesmith2044 10 ай бұрын
Gold maximum phenomenon
@StuffandThings_
@StuffandThings_ 10 ай бұрын
It also gives it unusually high electronegativity for a D block element, to the point where it can even form anions, due to the relativistic speeds reached by the valence electrons
@davidaugustofc2574
@davidaugustofc2574 9 ай бұрын
​@@Eden_Laika wouldn't SR redshift the light that Gold reflects? Gold is very good at reflecting Infra-Red and very bad at Reflecting Blue
@Eden_Laika
@Eden_Laika 9 ай бұрын
@@davidaugustofc2574 Only if the gold was moving away from the observer. Red shift isn't a property of a material, but of relative velocity.
@objective_psychology
@objective_psychology 10 ай бұрын
Tfw Einstein solved a Mercury mystery AND a mercury mystery
@KenLord
@KenLord 10 ай бұрын
cant believe that a video talking about how special relativity is required to understand the behaviour of the element mercury due to its impact on orbitals ... didnt mention how special relativity was required to explain the orbit of Mercury (the planet).
@xyex
@xyex 10 ай бұрын
Haha, that didn't even occur to me. 😂
@annaclarafenyo8185
@annaclarafenyo8185 10 ай бұрын
Special relativity doesn't explain the orbit of Mercury, General Relativity does. Special relativity gives a negligible correction.
@Relkond
@Relkond 10 ай бұрын
General relativity is also why gold is yellow. Without it, gold would be a boring, silvery color. It does a lot to make the world more interesting.
@oracleofdelphi4533
@oracleofdelphi4533 10 ай бұрын
Can't blame special relativity for the aftermath of a Taco Bell meal.
@Pho7on
@Pho7on 10 ай бұрын
@@Relkond Special relativity is what explains the color. It's a similar effect as in mercury.
@kharris274
@kharris274 10 ай бұрын
I have a question… if the more proton make some atom becomes less reactive, then why does galium also has a liquid phase on room temperature? And why we don’t have more metal that’s liquid in room temperature for higher atomic numbers
@yar3333
@yar3333 9 ай бұрын
Ga has an electron in an outer shell. Look at group 12. Also note that "room"/"not room" temperature is just a constant. For nature 0 and 200 degrees are not that different (add 273, the absolute zero, to both of them).
@skeeterinnewjersey5256
@skeeterinnewjersey5256 10 ай бұрын
Put this together with Hank's chemistry CRASH Course and you have a basic college course in physics. And it's understandable.
@alden1132
@alden1132 10 ай бұрын
I was very recently explaining this in a comment thread concerning liquid metals and mercury, specifically. It's a fascinating quirk of physics, and always makes me wonder what other unusual properties re: the behavior of matter might exist. This is the only example of this type t that I'm aware of, but there MUST be others...
@HappyBeezerStudios
@HappyBeezerStudios 10 ай бұрын
Copernicium, the element below mercury in the periodic table is also assumed to be liquid at standard temperature and pressure. We just haven't made enough to observe that.
@alden1132
@alden1132 10 ай бұрын
@@HappyBeezerStudios That's interesting. I had never heard that! I love trivia.
@Dykadda
@Dykadda 10 ай бұрын
me hearing "It maybe toxic but sure looks magical" from youtube autoplay and just thought, sounds like my ex 😅🤣
@Makabert.Abylon
@Makabert.Abylon 10 ай бұрын
There is good just rightly offensive joke there someone just needs to work it out. It has to start somewhere.. Women are like the elements of the periodic table, the more beautiful, the more toxic.
@kitcutting
@kitcutting 10 ай бұрын
“… Like a Ferrari with no engine. Fine as hell, but it just sits there and costs me money”
@kitcutting
@kitcutting 10 ай бұрын
@@SimuLord SEE, your ex was like the alpha particle, mine was like the Big Bang. Incredibly hot… and just as dense
@NinjaRunningWild
@NinjaRunningWild 10 ай бұрын
Pretty much most people’s ex.
@Andytlp
@Andytlp 10 ай бұрын
@@NinjaRunningWild If you like a person you dont just be nice to them. Otherwise you wont see their worst side
@markmathews2143
@markmathews2143 10 ай бұрын
This was a really good explanation that takes a complex idea like valency and electron shells, and completely explained several complex topics with the required detail to make it understandable to laymen and hobbyists. Even my son understood it and he struggles with science. And if they have any questions, they should go see Hank over at crash course, another excellent series that you should link to in the description as videos like this with an easy to understand follow up intro course makes science topics accessible to everyone. Good job.
@markloveless1001
@markloveless1001 10 ай бұрын
My dad gave me an aspirin bottle half full of mercury he got out of washing machine lid contact switches (the 60s were a simpler time). I remember pouring it from hand to hand. Didn't effect me at all (tic) at all (tic) at all....
@y_fam_goeglyd
@y_fam_goeglyd 10 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@Jefuslives
@Jefuslives 10 ай бұрын
I think we had the same dad.
@fumfering
@fumfering 10 ай бұрын
I broke a thermometer when I was a kid who couldn't stop fiddling with things way back when they actually had mercury in them, and have always wondered how much of my personality is a result of playing with the little shiny balls rolling around on the tile floor...😮
@casjean8904
@casjean8904 10 ай бұрын
@@fumfering same here! nowadays they call for a hazmat crew.
@markloveless1001
@markloveless1001 10 ай бұрын
@@Jefuslives I was too young to remember, but my older cousins told me when they buried my grandfather, they had to use dynamite (which was available at the farmer's co-op when Dad was a kid), and we were given lengths of fuses to play with. Light one end and when it got to the other, small bang.
@kbee225
@kbee225 10 ай бұрын
I was taught that the whole electron moving around the nucleus model is incorrect as there are some glaring issues with it. For one, it is a charge undergoing acceleration, it should be be emitting photons continuously till the energy of the electron decrease and eventually collapse into the nucleus. The quantum model uses the orbitals you mentioned and proposes that these electrons exist in a cloud of probability on these orbitals. So it is delocalized, i.e., it doesn't exist as a particle which takes up a location in space. So in this model, how does the velocity of an electron matter when you can never measure the location and the momentum of an electron simultaneously?
@Tangarisu
@Tangarisu 10 ай бұрын
Yes because whenever we measure or observe the atom and its electron shells we are essentially "taking a snapshot" and freezing the electron in observable space so we can gain an ide and its spin and angular momentum.
@goodmaro
@goodmaro 10 ай бұрын
"Incorrect" models can still be correct for much of what they model, which may be the important parts. It still makes sense to model electrons as point charges and point masses, provided you allow such things as angular momentum of 0 in some cases, i.e. that point either passing thru the center of the nucleus up and down or taking a figure 8 course. It's just a limit of our imagination, not being able to hold contradictory models in our heads simultaneously. But we know it works, because of such applications as NMR.
@FoxofWallstreet
@FoxofWallstreet 7 ай бұрын
It doesn‘t. To be honest, I‘m fairly sure that the entire idea behind this video is wrong, as it is doing it‘s math with E=mc^2 which is not the correct formula for moving objects, the correct one would be E^2=(mc^2)^2+(pc)^2 or E=ymc^2 with y being the Lorentz-factor. Or for short: Relativistic mass isn‘t a thing. So for short: The video really wasn‘t onto something at all.
@FSAPOJake
@FSAPOJake 10 ай бұрын
This might be one of the best explanations for a relatively (pun intended) complex topic in this channel's history.
@marckyle5895
@marckyle5895 10 ай бұрын
The way he _generalizes_ makes me feel _special_
@wheelie157
@wheelie157 10 ай бұрын
all made possible by post malone's brother too its crazy!
@Juice1984
@Juice1984 10 ай бұрын
I guess calling Mercury "Quicksilver" wasn't that far off.
@TheRedRave
@TheRedRave 10 ай бұрын
Little correction here, though it is often said like that, the 12th period, Zinc and under including mercury, are not transition metals as per the definition of what a transition metal is (see IUPAC color books). Being an element of the d-block, the middle of the table, doesn't mean they are transition metals, cause the 12th period ones are not.
@skeeterinnewjersey5256
@skeeterinnewjersey5256 10 ай бұрын
You had to step all over it for us lay folk, didn't you?
@goosenotmaverick1156
@goosenotmaverick1156 10 ай бұрын
​@@skeeterinnewjersey5256dude I didn't even understand the correction. Maybe I'm stupid, but at least it didn't ruin my fun 😂😂😂
@crazy_mind-ox8if
@crazy_mind-ox8if 10 ай бұрын
What are they considered then? An "other metal"? Didnt see any periodic tables with them labeled anything other than transition metals and I'm too lazy to try and find the IUPAC one you said.
@McKaySavage
@McKaySavage 10 ай бұрын
Most periodic table sources still class it as a transition metal, while some combine it with the basic metals and call the group post-transition metals. In all honesty, the delineation isn’t enough of a mistake to call for a correction of the video’s efforts to educate, given the necessity to simplify anyway.
@MarioFanGamer659
@MarioFanGamer659 10 ай бұрын
This reminds me of the classification of hydrogen and the problems thereof which they made four weeks ago.
@Verschlungen
@Verschlungen 7 ай бұрын
Ever since observing HgO powder turn into liquid mercury + (invisible) oxygen in a high school chemistry demonstration in 1960, Hg has been my "favorite element." Now, with your ability to take an abstruse topic (SR) and give it the explainlikeimfive treatment, you've made Hg even more magical for me, at age 80. Thank you!!
@KidFury27
@KidFury27 10 ай бұрын
I'm glad he identified that it must be -39 degrees Celsius.... Because at that temp F is pretty much the same 😂
@Fazzel
@Fazzel 10 ай бұрын
Yes, 40 degrees C and 40 degrees F are the same temperature.
@zimriel
@zimriel 10 ай бұрын
@@Fazzel no joke, that's where I first learnt about linear graphing.
@icedbear
@icedbear 10 ай бұрын
Units are important. There are more than two temperature scales.
@giantsquid2
@giantsquid2 10 ай бұрын
@@Fazzel No. 40 deg C is 104 degrees F.
@giantsquid2
@giantsquid2 10 ай бұрын
I think you mean -40 deg C is equal to -40 deg F.
@RogerTerrill
@RogerTerrill 10 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@feynmanschwingere_mc2270
@feynmanschwingere_mc2270 9 ай бұрын
Einstein is the GOAT...Funny thing is he came up with special relativity 2 years after essentially doing J.W. Gibbs historically famous work (but Gibbs's seminal work in thermodynamics/statistical mechanics) hadn't been translated to German yet. Oh and Einstein independently discovered the Raleigh-Jeans Law and several other laws in physics are named after other people even though Einstein discovered them first (e.g. Probability Waves being one of them - as Max Born always acknowledged in his letters). Not to mention Schrodinger definitely doesn't discover his famous wave mechanics without Einstein's help. The man was next level brilliant. Even Dirac was in awe.
@robertdyson4216
@robertdyson4216 6 ай бұрын
Very good. It’s rare that I hear someone say ‘negative’ for a number value rather than the operator 'minus', but I always do. On the wave/particle duality I find it best to say that these entities behave sometimes like waves and sometimes like particles, it’s not that they are both. You graphic for special relativity is what people usually show for ‘curved’ space-time in general relativity. I must look up the 2013 simulation. It will have needed some simplifications even to get that result, I am sure people will have another go sometime to get nearer.
@smokeduv
@smokeduv 10 ай бұрын
So the halogens are “sort of reactive”? They are most like if they were like the ones in the leftmost in reactivity but the noble gases sort of messes it up because those don’t react (mostly). Aside from that I love the video and the channel in general
@eroraf8637
@eroraf8637 10 ай бұрын
Halogens are highly electronegative with a single valence vacancy, so they REALLY want that last electron. Noble gases have a full valence shell, so they’re happy as they are.
@joy211191
@joy211191 9 ай бұрын
Question: But then in that case, shouldn't the elements beyond Hg, be liquid or have lower melting points and if we extrapolate this, then Cn should be a gas at room temperature? I mean this does explain the riddle of Hg, but then a whole set of new ones come into play when we solve this one.
@PierreVB-514
@PierreVB-514 10 ай бұрын
Great presentation 🙂 Next step , maybe you could come up with an a grounded explanation as to why technetium is one of the few elements of the periodic table of elements that isn't stable despite its low atomic weight.
@thomicrisler9855
@thomicrisler9855 10 ай бұрын
Yes! I've always wondered that.
@HappyBeezerStudios
@HappyBeezerStudios 10 ай бұрын
Elements with even proton number also tend to be more stable than those with odd protons for some reason. Odd elements also have fewer stable isotopes. Looking at it there doesn't seem to be any weird situation, normal β+ and β- decay. But other higher elements in the 53 to 57 nucleotide range show α decay, which doesn't happen again until 83 nucleotides, at which point it starts getting increasingly common.
@GoldSkulltulaHunter
@GoldSkulltulaHunter 10 ай бұрын
The script of this video was superbly written (and read!). It went from basic to complex without patronizing or alienating any viewers. I also really enjoyed the way scientific models are treated as that - models, not a precise description of reality - and how it shows that even "wrong", simplified or outdated models can serve purposes in academia and education, despite their limitations. Kudos to the writer and the whole team!
@erikjrn4080
@erikjrn4080 10 ай бұрын
So, basically, it has built-in relativistic speeds. Whoever named it quicksilver had absolutely no idea how accurate they were.
@uesdtosignin1038
@uesdtosignin1038 6 ай бұрын
8:57 This doesn't make sense to me. If electron become more massive as it move closer to sped of light, it should make the innermost shell larger. From the circular motion force formula F = (m*v^2)/r, if m (electron mass) is increase, F is same (more electron mass doesn't make electron have more charge) and the r must be increase. That mean the innermost shell most be larger.
@TheEternalPheonix
@TheEternalPheonix 8 ай бұрын
1:03 Sorry dude, I emptied it back out and refilled it with mercury.
@RR-in7do
@RR-in7do 10 ай бұрын
I've actually wondered this for years and this was by far the best explanation I've come across.
@mekosmowski
@mekosmowski 10 ай бұрын
So, why don't we see a similar effect in the rest of the period 6 transition metals? Gold and platinum are fairly malleable, but tungsten has arguably the greatest intermetallic bond strength based on a review of physical properties.
@eroraf8637
@eroraf8637 10 ай бұрын
Remember what he said about the filled sub-orbitals? Tungsten doesn’t have those. The intermolecular forces are much stronger for tungsten. Remember, mercury is only held together by van der Waals forces, precisely because of its filled sub-orbitals.
@mekosmowski
@mekosmowski 10 ай бұрын
@@eroraf8637 But they're all big enough they should also have the relativistic effects from the full f orbitals. So they all should be a bit shrunken and have greater electron density, so the should be more repulsive toward each other than their one up the group neighbor.
@eroraf8637
@eroraf8637 10 ай бұрын
@@mekosmowski I think you've misunderstood. The full f orbitals and the relativistic effect are two distinct contributions. Also, they aren't the only things that determine an element's melting point or material strength as a solid. You also have to consider the overlapping of different orbitals and sub-orbitals due to charge shielding and other such effects, but I'm not exactly an expert on condensed-matter physics.
@mekosmowski
@mekosmowski 10 ай бұрын
@@eroraf8637 I'm not asking why the other transition metals of the period aren't also liquid, but why they don't have reduced intermetallic bond strength compared to their group neighbors from one period above, for example gold compared to silver (which specifically does seem to have reduced bond strength as evidenced by greater malleability, but this might be more a factor of crystal structure). Sure, reduced atomic mass is expected to reduce the relativistic effects, but it doesn't seem like a dozen or so protons and neutrons would be enough for such a dramatic change.
@eroraf8637
@eroraf8637 10 ай бұрын
@@mekosmowski Like I said, there are other effects beyond just what's discussed in this video. Look up relativistic quantum chemistry if you want to know more. I'm just an astrophysicist, and I never took any graduate-level quantum or chemistry courses, so this is way beyond my expertise.
@ksoman953
@ksoman953 7 ай бұрын
It is so much more fun to think of electron clouds playing around in reactions between things to form, well cloudy bonds!
@RichardNeill01
@RichardNeill01 10 ай бұрын
Mass is a Lorentz invariant. It is momentum (gamma m v) that increases relativistically.
@curiousnerdkitteh
@curiousnerdkitteh 10 ай бұрын
Great video, and I love Reid's energy and enthusiasm!
@kevinjung6130
@kevinjung6130 10 ай бұрын
The "Qin" in "Qin Shi Huang" is pronounced closer to Chin rather than Quinn or Kin. Great video!
@pattheplanter
@pattheplanter 10 ай бұрын
Pinyin has some weird choices for pronunciation.
@4RILDIGITAL
@4RILDIGITAL 10 ай бұрын
Special relativity affects not only space travel, but also chemistry, down to the very properties of elements. Very well presented.
@AquibMohammedAyman
@AquibMohammedAyman 10 ай бұрын
It's not a liquid. It is a planet 😂
@ZurigaSungama
@ZurigaSungama 10 ай бұрын
It's not a planet. It is a deity 😂
@markloveless1001
@markloveless1001 10 ай бұрын
And the FTD delivery man.
@KenLord
@KenLord 10 ай бұрын
coincidentally, special relativity was required to understand the behaviour of both the planet (it's orbit) and the element (it's orbitals).
@azurius_
@azurius_ 10 ай бұрын
@@ZurigaSungama its not a deity its the singer from queen
@trdidion
@trdidion 10 ай бұрын
it’s also a car.
@GreatDivideSven
@GreatDivideSven 10 ай бұрын
This is a great video. Maybe it hit me at a time when I've been getting an interest in chemistry, but it explained well a lot of things that are not talked about every day. And got me to ask more questions
@johnford7847
@johnford7847 10 ай бұрын
Seems to me they haven't "proved" anything. They need to run the same simulations on, say, gold and thallium, to show that the results are not an artifact of the differences in simulation methods.
@zimriel
@zimriel 10 ай бұрын
that's hard to do with 80 protons. Maybe start small with zinc?
@FoxofWallstreet
@FoxofWallstreet 7 ай бұрын
Probably because the theory involves relativistic mass, which isn‘t even a thing anymore
@h7opolo
@h7opolo 10 ай бұрын
apparently contradictory ideas 8:35, claimed that electrons dont get closer to nucleus, but instead get faster, however at 9:00, the shells do contract.
@Xanman64-p6q
@Xanman64-p6q 10 ай бұрын
Subshells contract, not shells.
@jmackmcneill
@jmackmcneill 10 ай бұрын
They don't get close due to electromagnetic effect, the contraction due to mass is an S/T warping effect.
@hddrown
@hddrown 10 ай бұрын
7:20 No, No, No, No. Mass does not change relativistically, relativistic mass is an extremely outdated idea that only adds to student confusion when learning relativity. If mass changed with velocity motion would no longer be relative, you would be able to distinguish which observer was moving.
@FoxofWallstreet
@FoxofWallstreet 7 ай бұрын
Finally somebody with an actual clue on special relativity.
@altariacorona
@altariacorona 10 ай бұрын
My lecturer in inorganic chemistry told us this when I was a bachelor's student (in chem). Fascinating stuff, I never thought relativity in that way. I still remember until today
@paulwalsh2344
@paulwalsh2344 10 ай бұрын
This was one of the BEST SciShow episodes EVER ! And that's saying a lot !
@FoxDog1080
@FoxDog1080 9 ай бұрын
0:28 So what you're saying is if I took mercury and put it outside a month ago it would freeze? I thought it was lower
@pascal6077
@pascal6077 9 ай бұрын
This is by far one of my favorite scishow videos!
@alan_yong
@alan_yong 10 ай бұрын
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:00 *🤔 Mercury, a metal, remains liquid at room temperature and below due to its unique properties.* 00:54 *📚 Mercury's liquid state is explained by Special Relativity rather than traditional chemistry concepts.* 01:48 *🧪 Mercury belongs to the transition metals group on the periodic table and has filled outer electron shells, making it less reactive.* 05:32 *🌡️ Mercury's low melting point compared to other metals is due to its weak metallic bonds, resulting from filled outer electron shells.* 06:55 *🌀 Mercury's melting point is further influenced by Special Relativity, causing contraction of electron subshells and increased non-reactivity.* 09:43 *💻 Computer simulations incorporating Special Relativity principles confirmed mercury's low melting point.* Made with HARPA AI
@StuffandThings_
@StuffandThings_ 10 ай бұрын
Another fun one is gold, which is remarkably electronegative due to relativistic electrons. You can even get gold anions, such as in cesium auride!
@alan62036
@alan62036 9 ай бұрын
3:58 Why do the orbitals fill up so weird? Doesn't the S have to be complete before the P?
@HowShouldIKnow6543
@HowShouldIKnow6543 10 ай бұрын
Killer episode, the electron speed in the lower shells 😮
@X4Alpha4X
@X4Alpha4X 8 ай бұрын
so at what point does the relativistic effect start at? Tungsten, at # 74 has one of the HIGHEST melting temps, do those extra 6 electrons make that big a diff? or should tungsten have an even higher melting temp without relativity taking effect? also what happens to the ion forms of such heavy atoms?
@mr.boomguy
@mr.boomguy 9 ай бұрын
This is what I find fascinating about atoms, both recently and in general. The way just a few connections can change a whole element with vastly deferent properties, not to mention molecules
@MikkoRantalainen
@MikkoRantalainen 10 ай бұрын
Great video! It would be interesting to have a follow-up video about why does Gallium have so low melting point even though it has much less protons than Mercury?
@Leadvest
@Leadvest 10 ай бұрын
It's crazy how approaching chemistry backwards from the van der Waals force creates such an intuitive cognitive model.
@PADARM
@PADARM 10 ай бұрын
It's incredible how powerful Relativity is. It continues to give us solutions 100 years after being created.
@daryllwilson3708
@daryllwilson3708 10 ай бұрын
Excellent video. I wish 10% of KZbin had content half as good as this video.
@SanchoPanza-m8m
@SanchoPanza-m8m 10 ай бұрын
If you loved me half as much as I love you, you wouldn't worry me half as much as you do.
@johnathonhughes4814
@johnathonhughes4814 9 ай бұрын
I watch a lot of science videos but this one expanded my view of atomic theory by applying relativity to chemistry. Thanks so much!
@SuperiorDave
@SuperiorDave 10 ай бұрын
This was one of my favorite episodes. I love chemistry. Thank you sci show.
@knutritter461
@knutritter461 10 ай бұрын
M. Sc. of chemistry here.... a GREAT video and explanation! When we finally got to the point in our studies why it is liquid, why gold has a color and other elements have unexpected oxidation-states (inert-pair-effect), the explanation was mindblowing to us. Strongly contracting s-orbitals and only slightly contracting d-orbitals causing bad overlapping. Overlapping d-orbitals are just.... bad beyond recognition causing a bad metal bond. Thank you Einstein! 🤣
@esmenhamaire6398
@esmenhamaire6398 10 ай бұрын
Absolutely brilliant episode!. I've generally not been keen on this presenters presentation style, but in this episode couldn't find fault with his delivery.. The topic was extremely interesting too - one where both quantum mechanics an special relativity are required to explain something. I'd love to see a deeper dive on the topic!
@VikingRul3s
@VikingRul3s 10 ай бұрын
2:37 Is that your explanation of the double slit experiment?
@peka2478
@peka2478 10 ай бұрын
2:22 every model is "wrong" in the way that it simplifies the complexity of reality down to a more understandable system, which more or less behaves like the real one - but of course, leaving out some things, its... "wrong", and thats fine.
@michaelmckinney7240
@michaelmckinney7240 10 ай бұрын
What a wonderful presentation by Reid Reimers who very clearly and interestingly describes the behavior of the mercury atom. Reid doesn't teach so much as he invites all of us to learn together in this very effective tutorial. I don't like being taught but I love learning which is why I give this presentation very high marks. Thank you Reid.
@uniLLchiara
@uniLLchiara 7 ай бұрын
Amazing video, thanks for all the preparation! Just a a follow up question: Then shouldn't this principle also apply to all the other metals with even more electrons?
@Sparky-ww5re
@Sparky-ww5re 8 ай бұрын
Mercury aka quicksilver indeed had some very useful applications. Old timers may remember the so called "silent light switches " famously made by GE, Leviton, and probably other manufacturers as well, with a 50 year warranty, these were available until 1991, and were most popular in the 1960s - 1970s for use in children's rooms, nurseries, libraries and similar areas where silence is golden. It was also used in switches for the trunk & hood lights in automobiles, and of course thermostats until about the early 2000s, around 2002. This is something to keep in mind if you're scrapping a vehicle that's more than 20 years old, although like many things, the dangers of mercury tend to be a bit overexaggerated. .
@pauls5745
@pauls5745 10 ай бұрын
I got very happy at the use of the emoji at 4:19
@AroundTheBlockAgain
@AroundTheBlockAgain 5 ай бұрын
I love it when I learn that relativity and speed-of-light-problems can be close by and familiar to me. It's not just some weird thing that could theoretically happen to future space travelers speeding across the galaxy at significant-fractions-of-the-speed-of-light. It's in some very down-to-earth stuff like mercury and gold. Thanks for this video!
@Nomad77ca
@Nomad77ca 10 ай бұрын
Would this relativistic effect also apply to other larger atoms and their behavior??
@phillair3813
@phillair3813 10 ай бұрын
Thank you for the clear explanation. As a retired science teacher, it's terrific to be in the know of something relativity can illuminate.
@guruprasadr6743
@guruprasadr6743 10 ай бұрын
Traditionally we are taught to think that relativistic effects are of no consequence in conventional chemistry. I must confess that initially I thought the suggestion of relativity to explain the liquid nature as preposterous. As the video progressed I can only say that I continued to watch it in silent amazement. I guess this requires a re thinking of what we leant in schools and colleges. Thank you for opening a completely new perspective on this.
@whtiequillBj
@whtiequillBj 10 ай бұрын
@7:58, I feel this should be noted that this doesn't happen till you start to reach speeds near the speed of light.
@julianbrelsford
@julianbrelsford 10 ай бұрын
As a kid growing up in a cold climate, i remember seeing a lot of thermometers whose coldest measurable temperature was lower than -40. Our coldest day ever in my town (during my time there) was colder than that, so i guess a mercury thermometer would have reached its freezing point. But as far as I know, mercury thermometers were hardly used anywhere by that point, since (when they break) alcohol or bimetallic strip thermometers are pretty harmless by comparison.
@Eztoez
@Eztoez 8 ай бұрын
Beautifully explained. So clear and easy to understand.
@jeremypearson9019
@jeremypearson9019 9 ай бұрын
This is the first time I have ever heard anything about electrons in lower shells moving at higher velocities and that they can sometimes be subject to relativistic effects. This is incredible! Why didn't this ever come up in any of my college classes, or at least in any other popular science media? This seems to me like it's extremely relevant because it's a case where quantum physics and relativity work together simultaneously to describe an observable phenomenon.
@FoxofWallstreet
@FoxofWallstreet 7 ай бұрын
Because it is incorrect
@garyfilmer382
@garyfilmer382 10 ай бұрын
A great, stunning explanation! Thank you for this video.
@unything2696
@unything2696 10 ай бұрын
My prof in computational chemistry explained relativistic effects in two sentences and we moved on. And it was indeed enough. Short and precise, enough for the moment. It wasn't the main topic of the lesson, but it was helpful to continue. (Coming from HF, taking a look at semi empirical methods going towards DFT.) I like the explanations giving in this video, they did a good job. It's all models anyway, don't forget that. Everything is relative;)
@Hatecrewdethrol
@Hatecrewdethrol 10 ай бұрын
While i was taught the planetary model back when i was in high school (early 2000's) they also were very clear that to explain that: "atoms do not actually look like this, we have no idea what atoms look like because they're too small, but using this model to explain it aligns with how things actually react in experiments"
@TheTruthPlease100
@TheTruthPlease100 10 ай бұрын
Close but sounds like there are a few things we don't fully understand yet. Cool!
@realcreative3334
@realcreative3334 10 ай бұрын
I was talking to a professor in inorganic chemistry at my uni last semester and he said pretty much exactly this, but followed it up with the fact that Copernicium, which is in the period bellow is would also be a liquid if we could observe it properly in room temperature
@smartguy-lx9im
@smartguy-lx9im 8 ай бұрын
Except we never will because a) it will very quickly decay into something that is NOT copernicium and b) the radiation released in doing so would kill/injure anyone watching and heat the sample so much it would vapourise. Understandably, most of the transuranic elements are somewhat mysterious and near impossible to study.
@roguedogx
@roguedogx 10 ай бұрын
11:21 I've been thinking about using it for a different purpose. compression.
@hbchaitanyabharadwaj3509
@hbchaitanyabharadwaj3509 10 ай бұрын
Apologies for my ignorance. If this the reason why mercury is a liquid, why don't we have all elements after mercury to have similar, or even lower melting points? Is it also dependent on the electron configuration of mercury as explained? Special relativity idea here seem to be not dependent on thr electron configuration, but rather on the amount of charge in the nucleus, aka, no of protons.
@raufhafeez6895
@raufhafeez6895 3 ай бұрын
Interesting! One thing I didn’t understand was the repeated references to reactivity while all the simulation was geared toward was to explain the melting point. What does reactivity has to do with melting?
@Strype13
@Strype13 10 ай бұрын
When mercury freezes (at -39ºC), does it resemble other solid metals?
@keegs53
@keegs53 9 ай бұрын
This is crazy. You went from high school chemistry, to explaining atomic orbitals, to wave-particle duality and special relativity in just over 10 minutes.
@thewitheredfigtree
@thewitheredfigtree 2 ай бұрын
I get confused about the whole “electrons orbiting” thing. I hear some QFT physicists say that it’s wrong to say the electrons are moving, let alone moving at half c. So which is it, do they actually move around or not?
@MrBlaDiBla68
@MrBlaDiBla68 10 ай бұрын
Excellent approachable vid !
@Roust7
@Roust7 3 ай бұрын
If your expectation for lower melting point of mercury is correct which os at -37C then why Copernicum with 112 proton which then should have stronger relativistic effects at the S 1 orbital has calculated melting point of 10 C much higher than mercury with less protons?
@takumi2023
@takumi2023 10 ай бұрын
i was hoping you go into the element below it even if it's manmade i was wondering if it followed the pattern and it's melting point is even lower. or did we not make more than a few molecules to see it's physical property?
@leucurus5057
@leucurus5057 9 ай бұрын
6:20 thats also called dispersion forces
The Last Living Thing Won't Be a Cockroach
15:26
SciShow
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
This New Element is Lighter than Hydrogen. What?!?!
7:39
SciShow
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН
Enceinte et en Bazard: Les Chroniques du Nettoyage ! 🚽✨
00:21
Two More French
Рет қаралды 42 МЛН
Chain Game Strong ⛓️
00:21
Anwar Jibawi
Рет қаралды 41 МЛН
Support each other🤝
00:31
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 81 МЛН
People said this experiment was impossible, so I tried it
34:49
Veritasium
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Why Does Everything Decay Into Lead
13:50
SciShow
Рет қаралды 2,2 МЛН
The bizarre patterns that emerge when you heat ANY fluid
11:50
Steve Mould
Рет қаралды 1,9 МЛН
What if Singularities DO NOT Exist?
15:41
PBS Space Time
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
How Do We Know How Old the Earth Is?
14:39
SciShow
Рет қаралды 275 М.
We Finally Made Synthetic Spider Silk
11:10
SciShow
Рет қаралды 412 М.
Why Does Changing Just One Proton Change an Element?
13:57
Arvin Ash
Рет қаралды 542 М.
Something weird happens when you keep squeezing
11:36
Vox
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
An Ancient Roman Shipwreck May Explain the Universe
31:15
SciShow
Рет қаралды 4,8 МЛН