Scott Peterson Attorneys Battle Over Which Lab Will Test New DNA Evidence

[@HollyGW]

Why is there an Innocent Project supporting him??? HES GUILTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@simpinainteasyRHEC]

.... imagine, someone might have been wrong and they ran with the bs... or are we still lacking common sense? Why would this org and countless legal professionals actually look into cases. Mayyybe, just maybe, you're wrong, and the government fked up. Lol as if that isn't typical! For reference, Baldwin is the most recent flub up. Lol not to mention, without all your investigative credentials and evidence, I think I'll stick to the professionals who *KNOW* what they're doing.

[@LindaAnnSmith-r8p]

It is not the same one.

[@HollyGW]

@@LindaAnnSmith-r8p what is not the same one? The Innocent Project of Los Angeles is supporting him.

[@LindaAnnSmith-r8p]

@@HollyGW The LAIP is the one who are lying their faces off for a baby killer. The IP want nothing to do with him, ever.

[@motocatz87]

@@HollyGW Yes, because the Peterson's gave them lots of $$$$donations.

[@talbering1776]

Everybody no matter who they are is entitled to a fair trial all evidence should be tested and allowed to be presented that is Our Constitutional Right and we believe that everybody should have a fair shot in our court systems and we know our court systems have been totally corrupted so let the evidence speak for itself let the evidence be tested and presented🙏🏼 I Was one by the evidence they allowed to be presented in the first trial that found him guilty however if there is new DNA evidence it should be tested and it should be allowed and he should be allowed his day in court that is his Constitutional Right as a US citizen!! Maybe we got this wrong?

[@jamesjamesnet]

True

[@motocatz87]

He had a fair trial! He was found guilty and is guilty. This is a joke!!

[@motocatz87]

@@SunnyDays70s It's not new evidence. It was already tested.

[@oliviashuii364]

Yes that’s right. He did not have close to a fair trial. Should have been dismissed

[@Indiartworks]

​@@SunnyDays70s, that's not true at all...new evidence is discovered all the time. That has absolutely nothing to do with weather a trial is fair or not

[@high_maintenance]

Not this American Psycho again 🤦🏾‍♀️

[@jocelynastheart2732]

When someone is innocent, they have nothing but questions. When someone is guilty, they have nothing but answers.

[@glitter7777]

The prosecutor is as nervous as a cat in a room full of rocking chairs and it shows

[@CIGLLC]

I agree but why is that??

[@CIGLLC]

Is it her natural personality or does she not believe in the States case after the innocence project conducted their own independent investigation which appears to be exculpatory in support of Petersons innocence??

[@curvywavygirl]

​@@CIGLLC she definitely knows big mistakes were made back then. She's not confident in what she's saying.

[@SacredForest347]

She seems kinda green, like she's not done this before. Her argument was seriously flawed!! 😮

[@glitter7777]

@@SacredForest347yeah I mean I have always thought Scott was guilty but I never thought they proved it behind a reasonable doubt. If there is new evidence that was not tested or things not tested properly he has the right to have that tested correctly just like everyone else in America. DNA has freed and jailed many people

[@GeorgeniaRowe]

this caess has haunt me from day one.its sad its about laci and conner pray for the family and friends😢

[@GeorgeniaRowe]

I'm saying is its being with me sicen day one .

[@Romulan2469]

This is all a waste of the court's time. We all know Peterson is guilty.

[@NotMoriarty1]

I know of at least 196 other people that was in prison some of them on death row by the way that we knew were guilty and then DNA determined they were not and that's just from the *Innocence Project".

[@limehouseblues]

lol...not a legal argument

[@user_abcxyzz]

We do?

[@VideoFanatic02]

@@user_abcxyzz Yes we do.

[@angelbaybi997]

Of course he did it​@@user_abcxyzz

[@kelleylynch4490]

All evidence should have been approved for new testing.

[@steelhurricane4041]

I agree. Just to be sure.

[@derekhauser6780]

This pickup by the innocence project and how these lawyers for them are acting angers me. I have lost a great deal of respect for them.

[@derekhauser6780]

@@Look_What_You_Did did you watch the original trial?

[@LindaAnnSmith-r8p]

They are not the same org. The real one hates Scott Peterson.

[@truecrimematters]

@@LindaAnnSmith-r8plies.

[@holylandfan3275]

The innocence project is ridiculous. There may be a couple that are innocent, but the main ones they stand behind are guilty. There was one they supported that was on death row. They even stood outside of the prison shouting and protesting saying an innocent man was going to get executed as he was getting ready to be executed of a ‘r’ and murder. Well, decades later when DNA was better (after he was already executed), they tested it again. Yep, a multi billion to one, an exact match. He was guilty, but just an excellent liar and convinced them he didn’t do it. They looked like fools.

[@LindaAnnSmith-r8p]

@@holylandfan3275 The fraud org needs to be shut down.

[@lindabarker9694]

Scott just trying to be released from prison. As he knkw he killed laci & connor

[@lisastebbins1524]

ALL items should have been approved for DNA testing!!!!

[@interestingisitnot1]

Everyone deserves justice. Everyone.

[@sophie8394]

Justice was served 20 years ago.

[@moonbeam127tmiller5]

YOU ALL KNOW HE'S GUILTY! EVEN IF HE HIRED HELP!!!

[@steelhurricane4041]

Why do you care? Why are you watching this new discovery evidence and wasting your time?

[@mariagraf437]

Why wasn't this evidence in the trial?

[@simpinainteasyRHEC]

Didn't fit their narrative

[@YIKESMF]

Why is so much cut out and edited here?????

[@simpinainteasyRHEC]

If this man was as guilty as all you Karen's claim... why would he still be fighting with large organizations and some very accomplished legal professionals to support and work for free to help Mr. Peterson? I realize common sense and *critical thinking* isnt the norm anymore, but try it sometime, its great.

[@LindaAnnSmith-r8p]

LAIP is not a large org. You're confusing them with the actual on.

[@truecrimematters]

Exactly. Pretty wild it goes over the heads of so many.

[@truecrimematters]

@@LindaAnnSmith-r8peven more reason to wonder why as a tiny organization they’re wasting so much time ruining/risking their reputations…if they don’t believe he may actually be innocent.

[@jocelynastheart2732]

When someone is innocent, they have nothing but questions. When someone is guilty, they have nothing but answers.

[@LindaAnnSmith-r8p]

@@jocelynastheart2732 What the heck are you talking about?

[@Trial-watcher2023]

System needs to change if he’s free!

[@motocatz87]

The LA Innocence Project attorney is so unprofessional. I wonder how big a donation $$$ the Peterson's gave to this organization? There is no other possible way an organization would touch this case. It was Scott's only way to worm his way outta his cage other than through an organization like this. That attorney is crazy, but I guess money is worth ruining their reputation to her. Scott is guilty and always will be.

[@Nelly-b6q]

She was professional enough to wash her hair for a court appearance.

[@motocatz87]

@@Nelly-b6q Lol...I agree with you there!

[@nonya8966]

This is ridicules

[@CNSTAdventures]

I’ve lost all faith in this innocence project . Any credibility has been lost as well

[@donquetz1446]

Free this man.

[@bernadettebigger3283]

You joking me

[@jocelynastheart2732]