World of Warships- Is WG Getting Lazier Than Ever?

[@helekachopter696]

Merry Christmas everybody

[@ifax1245]

I'd sooner have a "Blucher" an historically important ship described as a "copy paste" compared to paper fantasy ships... More historical ships please.

[@solidtoto]

And personally I'd rather have new historical ships than another of the same we have already seen.

[@joshuayang0331]

i mean they are all ships, either copy or just fantasy (most paper ships are, rarely did they follow much of a design but just mashing multiple in one), and if they are designed around their history, i'd say definitely better than paper shops, wg has the economy and we get the ship with its history, why not

[@Boatswain_Tam]

Same. Much better to have another historical ship than another overpowered T10 paper ship

[@randomyoutubecommentersecu7639]

​​@@solidtoto Ohhh new original ship? It is just a ruprecht hull with torps , fast bismarck guns ...Why bother? Blucher? We already have Hipper. Missouri? She's just Iowa but with radar, good thing we can print credits. Yorktown , a new historical ship? Nah we don't like it, cv, gimmicks, etc...Oh? Odin? Nah we still are gonna complain, too small caliber...... There's just no pleasing you people, is there? If Wisconsin didn't have the dented fast reload F key and tight diapersion people would shit on her real hard as well .....Always complaining...Look at tenesse....Too slow, too small caliber, they don't appreciate the armor

[@kirinrias6912]

and I don't care if a ship is real or not, as long as it's fun and brings its own style of play instead of the umpteenth copy

[@unshiftedcobra7439]

WG keeps adding these historical and copy paste/kit bash ships is because WG does not have the proper devs to make any new models ever since they split from Lesta in 2022. We’ve gotten almost 0 new models since the split; Bungo line was the last line that Lesta made, everything else is copy paste. They don’t do it because they’ve run out of ideas, they do it because making historical ships is the only way to get out of controversy. Even then, you still have moments like the Tennessee devblog where it had California’s hull number, showing they just copied the model. Every new premium is just a reskin and it probably won’t change anytime soon.

[@Norbrookc]

This, and the other thing is that they're getting to the point where actual ships that fit the game model are getting rarer. Once you get to the latter part of the 1950's, you're talking about missile ships, jets on aircraft carriers, etc., all of which causes conniption fits whenever something like that gets mentioned.

[@AshCatTrainz]

Dupleix looking at you from the background:

[@laudennis8633]

The high tier focus model of the game is very damaging, limiting minor navies' historical disign to a side.

[@themememeister2557]

This is a perfect reason why they should start bringing back old dockyards. Almost all the old dockyards were unique, and it will give players a chance to obtain them again making everybody happy.

[@Cloudman572]

What do they give to folks who already have the dockyard ship when they repeat the dockyadd?

[@diegokevin3824]

​@@Cloudman572 coal, steel, doubloons? They can just give resources or crates for a random ship of the same tier as the dockyard ship.

[@Cloudman572]

@@diegokevin3824 I have all ships of those tiers why can't I have a new ship same as newer players get from dockyard event.

[@santiagopadilla417]

Sealord, every time you said "Blucher" , some horses started wining

[@dr.bakterius1168]

Why? I thought it was alright. You should have heard him trying to say "Schleswig-Holstein"...

[@Boba-Fett-GS1150Ez]

@@dr.bakterius1168 Young Frankenstein reference

[@Boba-Fett-GS1150Ez]

But she wants to woll in da hay wit you. Woll and Woll and WWWooool awound.

[@Tundraviper41]

To be Honest Wargaming had the option of filling out the lower tiers for the Pan-American Battleship tech tree with these ships: Tier 4: Rivadavia, A class of Battleships built in America for the Argentine Navy. Armed with TWELVE 305mm guns in six Twin turrets, and a Massive Secondary battery of twelve 152.4mm guns and sixteen 102mm guns. The ship was Unique in that it had Two Super firing pairs of twin turrets on the bow and stern, but it also had TWO wing turrets with one on each side in a Kaiser layout. Tier 5: One of the alternate designs for the Brazilian Rio de Janeiro class battleships that sacrificed the larger number of 305mm guns for fewer, but more powerful 356mm guns. Tier 6: Almirante Latorre, a Chilean Battleship equipped with 356mm guns, but had only an inch thicker main armor belt of 230mm (9 inches) from the Rio de Janeiro's 229mm. The Ship is visually similar to the Iron Duke, but with two funnels and a different layout of the Secondary battery. The ship would be requistioned by the british and would become HMS Canada during WW1. Tier 7: Battleship Riachuelo, the Last Brazilian Battleship design that was also the most Powerful Battleship ever designed by Brazil. The Riachuelo's were very similar in design to the Queen Elizabeth class Battleships, but were slightly more armored, and were lighter in terms of displacement. The Ship was distinguishable from the Queen Elizabeth's as the Riachuelo's had TWO funnels instead of just one like the Elizabeths, and were 19 feet shorter than the Elizabeth's length wise. All these ships still had massive Secondary batteries of 152.4 mm guns and they would fit in well with the massive Secondary battery Gimmick of the Pan-American battleships, but just toned down to make them on equal ground with lower tier ships.

[@AshCatTrainz]

“Copy-Paste is purely a premium thing” *looks at the Dutch, commonwealth, pan American lines* Sealord you sure about that.

[@AshCatTrainz]

PAN-AMERICA HAS NO FUCKING EXCUSE. On cruisers and battleships.

[@maithiunas1171]

This Whole almost 14 minute video and not once was it brought up that during the Lesta/WG separation, Lesta pretty much kept the majority of the art department. Goes without saying we'd get a bunch of copy paste ships for awhile while WG builds up their own art department. One can't just throw together a brand new top to bottom art department and begin working on and pumping out lots of brand new high quality models in no time... These things take time (initial research/model rendering/play testing). Keep in mind all the events and ship line releases are road mapped and begin development several months ahead of time if not over a year. It's clear that WG still had some Lesta assets left that had not been released before the separation and since then have been carefully drip feeding those assets to hold over the player base until their independently developed lines and models have completed development and approach their road mapped release period. Also, pretty sure the game engine is set to change iirc, so i'm sure they're working behind the scenes on that as well..

[@tijger5353]

Merry christmas and a happy new year everyone

[@Filip1891_]

As long as they are historical ships i have no problems with them making more of the same class, i would rather take a third and final Hipper-class than some t10 papership. The amount of historical ships that hasn't been added or removed is sad.

[@stevebarnett-f5o]

If WG had a low tier mode, no subs, no carriers, there are loads of WW1 and earlier ships not in game. There is no reason for anyone to play low tiers, needs fixing.

[@Jedi_Master_Obi-Wan_Kenobi66]

Merry Christmas Sea Lord!

[@broccanmacronain457]

Happy Yule to all and your loved ones

[@Cloudman572]

Thank you, same wishes from me to you and all. GL and HF.

[@solidtoto]

The issue is not that it's a copy paste, the issue is that it's ANOTHER copypaste in the middle of 2 years of copypastes.

[@davidrobinson4553]

It's just Wargambling being Wargambling Sea Lord, it's the nature of the beast. We have seen later ships entering the game eg Tiger 59, Friesland and Forest Sherman and WG have been testing missiles even adding them to the Star Trek event, just because WG deny it doesn't mean it won't happen we know that from experience lol

[@billwalker9509]

Merry Christmas. Don't consider WG lazy for giving us the Johnston which everybody wanted.

[@clmwrx]

Same for Wisconsin. Shame the direction taken with Johnston tho.

[@jamesbrand2243]

OK Bucher is pronounced Bloo-kr according to Google and Wikipedia. Bucher was a Prussian Field Marshall who led the Prussians at Waterloo against Napoleon. Also in the "African Queen" Humphrey Bogart and Katherine Hepburn were captured in WWI Africa and taken aboard the Bulcher (not the same one). But Bogart also pronounced it "Bloo-kr". Also "Patrie" is also pronounced "Pat-ry" not Petrie - he was Rob Petrie of the Dick Van Dyke show. Wikipedia: "Patrie (French "fatherland") or La Patrie (The fatherland)" The root is Latin "Pater" the word for "father". Lastly, I've been playing WOWs since 2017. I have collected 569 ships. Wargaming (Blasphemy) could stop producing new ships anytime. (Blasphemy)! There are plenty of ships. All new ships are worth is revenue for Wargaming. Copy and paste ships are not worth buying. MERRY CHRISTMAS SEA LORD! I watch your channel every time you make a new vid, sometimes at 4AM. 😍😍😍😍😍

[@bidyarnovhazarika494]

Today morning i opened the normal santa containers from the advent calender and got 30 days premium time...... then got one from daily offers in armoury and guess what, i got tier 9 DD USS Johnston...... truly a christmas day to enjoy

[@AlanRoehrich9651]

I'd take that one for sure. Clan mate got the Missouri today. I'd love that one, too. But I got the Florida, the London, and the Chikuma II.

[@bidyarnovhazarika494]

@AlanRoehrich9651 i also got florida from the event pass mega container

[@Niyoko1988]

Merry christmas! To topic: I have not liked Hipper class ships and hearing this news gives me the reason to skip next dockyard.

[@arinpoonpinrode1467]

Sea lord about the pan American line topic you brought up. I think the reason WG kept the real steel ship out is because they plan to introduce them as premium ship to make money rather than put them in tech line.

[@patricktravis4134]

Merry Christmas my friend!

[@Smenkhaare]

Merry Christmas to all and have a Happy New Year...

[@TheGuardianofAzarath]

Merry Christmas sealord. Interesting points, and a good argument to use against those who want every fletcher class dd in the game, for some weird reason.

[@octaviusmorlock]

Merry Christmas Sea Lord! And to you Comment Section!

[@PsydenIII]

There is enough designs to make at least two German Panzerschiffe lines from tier 6 to 10, one with 11 and 12-inch guns, one with 15-inch guns. There is at least another line of German Battleships that could go from either 6 or 7 to 10. I've sketched a German Large Cruiser line from 6-10, leaving out the Panzerschiffes entirely. For the USN, I was able to dig up enough designs for a Battlecruiser line, a Large Cruiser line that started with the ARCs and ended with the Alaska prelims. There is an entire line of CLAA that could be built, with a split included, though I designed that before Pan-American and Pan-Asian cruisers were announced, so there would either need to be tweaks or repeats with differencing mechanics. There is also the possibility for a 10-inch armed cruiser line, though some of the earlier hulls could be similar to what we have, since the USN had plans to turret swap double 10-inch guns onto three-gun 8-inch barbettes, if the need arose, and tier 10 would definitely need to be a fantasy design. There is a line of 4 turret 8-inch cruisers that could be built, as well, which would trade armor for volley weight. At least one Battle Cruiser/ Battleship Cruiser line is available (Battleship Cruisers were wild designs, btw). Battle Scouts are another quirky line that could be made (I'd class them as Cruisers in-game because they are a handful of big guns strapped to enormous engines, and basically just enough steel that it's hydrodynamic). As for DDs, there is enough for a pure gunboat line, and most of a torpedo focused line, with some WG Fantasies to close some holes. IJN has enough at least two Battleship lines, an All Forward line (which would include Izumo, with an appropriate replacement in the Yamato Line), and Quad Turret Line, both starting at tier 6. I was fairly close to making third line, which was Secondary focused, though research into Japanese ships is a bit harder and more time consuming for me to do. As for the French, I was able to do a standard CV line, as well as a secondary-focused CV line.

[@jacoblounsbury]

If there's one thing I could ask from Sea Lord is this as a Christmas gift is for us to get starting next year? Videos of Sea Lord grinding out every destroyer line in the game and we get to watch him grind out. Destroyer lines all of them in the game

[@jbatina]

As a US warship affectionato, I have hope hoped WG would add a few ships starting with the modernized Nevada. My dad actually was on a New Mexico class Bb in WW2, the Mississippi which would be a sentimental addition. A Fargo class CL, I guess they added the Rochester for the Oregon city class. A few option

[@TheEvil909295]

Lesta gets a lot more and more beautifully designed new ship than we get from WG. If you look at the new ships we got, they are mostly copy and paste or they were simply thrown together from existing assets.

[@origamichik3n]

What hasn't been added yet? Still, not every nation has at least a couple of 4-gun turreted cruisers and battleships. Not every nation has a hybrid DD/BB/CA/CL. Then will be the turn to add 4-gun turreted submarines and DDs. And then we will move on to 5-gun turrets for everyone.

[@1337flite]

Numero Uno, Merry Xmas Sealord.

[@erikalexander414]

To be fair Germany and Russia had a lot of ships on paper that never made it to the drydock. There are still oodles of ships left. Where's the Japanese Super Submarine with the double Hull

[@inertloki5193]

HMAS Sydney as a premium ship please WG.

[@roboticus71]

Which HMAS Sydney do you want; the ww1 version or the ww2 modified Leander class one? I'd love the ww2 version as a coal ship but I don't like my chances

[@broccanmacronain457]

I agree with the rest of the Pan American line. There was a whole bunch of ships when Brazil, and Argentina (with several others) were doing the my navy is better than your navy thing.

[@LeonardPinnix]

The trouble with copy and paste ships is, unless you gimmick them up, they're the same as the original, which leads to massive gimmicking and seriously unreal performance on newer ships, which leads to even greater gimmicks on the next batch of ships, and so on, etc. Clones with minor differences lead to clones with greater differences which lead to clones with insane gimmicks so the player base will buy them. However, since that pretty much started with the first update, it's way too late to change it now!

[@suryia6706]

Merry xmas SLM and keep up thr good work. BZ

[@Karth3n]

2:41 its 5 ships in a row cause you forgot Lushun, a Neustrashimy copy.

[@120420]

NO COMMENT. I'll be a good boy today!😅😅😅 Hope all is well Mount. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

[@sedatedape315]

Careful what you wish for. During WWII, and after, the US Coast Guard gets folded under the US Navy banner. US Coast Guard had dozens of their cutters used for convoy escort, coastal patrols, and submarine hunting. I haven't seen any of those in-game yet 😊

[@kamranqureshi1884]

Fr having a support ship will be very fine.

[@Iamdarthplague]

Happy Christmas Mount.

[@irishwind1971]

I am excited about Blucher. And seeing how WG made Wisconsin a fun ship, I hope we see some tweaks to make Blucher fun and interesting at a higher tier. As for the big picture, I would rather see interesting takes on sister ships, or some ships that at a minimum had their keels laid, than some completely made up BS that WG can't even point to a Plan Z or something similar for the concept.

[@byz-blade]

There are plenty of real ships not in the game, but most would be in the T3-7 range. So they wouldn’t get a lot of return on the art time invested. And WG probably has other unreleased non-WOWS projects on the go which require a lot more artist time to get off the ground. I have no problem with adding a few more sister ships such as Washington, Prince of Wales, etc. Would also like to see more WWI British BBs.

[@viper592]

WG's problem is that they started tier 1-2 at 1919 basically. If they had started at 1880, they wouldn't have a problem with real steel ships like they do.

[@QALibrary]

Merry Christmas and happy new year

[@luckymies205]

Running out of ships? Well yeah, we have two remaining ships from Deutschland ships, sweden coastal ships, Finland coastal ships, submarines, and some other nations as well. Soo... we still have small ships to go, before you juce out "big names", and then you move to small ones. Kinda small mess here in WG office, methinks.

[@marknerren402]

Why use HE against broadsides? Is the AP on the Niord that bad?

[@sealordmountbatten]

Was completing the fire starting mission for the dockyard

[@genarorecio3168]

IMHO, there are plenty of designs or real historical ships that haven’t been added (sister ships or side grade ships that we have in the game). However, many of them have to be slotted at mid tier (between V and VIII). So, they can’t make much money off them. Nevertheless, I don’t lose the hope we’ll see some of them added in the near future. Merry Christmas.

[@brentm9848]

The entire reason WG gave that we don’t have a Canadian line is that the ships would be “too similar to British ships” Which is now bullshit.

[@dylyna04]

Really like ' The Sinking of Blücher - The King's Choice (2016) ' and delighted to see historical ships being copied in ^^. Still 10 times better than Hybrid nonsense that has been pushed in. Merry Christmas everybody 🙂

[@UnimpressedAussie]

Minimum effort, maximum profits... I think it's astoundingly clear that they really don't give a single shit about their playerbase. We are nought but the means to more profit.

[@dukwhunter1]

Merry Christmas SLM

[@TruckingShooter]

At least it's a historical ship but I'm hoping it's going to be easier to get since it is basically a copy pasta of models that has been in the game since forever.

[@Bohdisattva326]

Bro. Eventually they were. going to run out of ships 😂. Wot Xmas is pretty solid. I usually play tanks around Xmas 🎄

[@Steve1161V]

Merry Christmas everyone! Merry Christmas Sea Lord! 🎉🎉🎉🎄🎄🎄

[@thelonelyturkey7902]

In a way wg has the problems of a digital car manufacturer. There are only so many classes of vehicles you can produce in so many varieties and like Seaford says it does cost money and time to create a new ship. So why completely redesign the Toyota Corolla from the group up every time you want to make a new variation? Not defending wg for lack of newer ships that are different but it is a thing that happened in Germany and the Soviet Union with the tanks in ww2.

[@user-yc6sc4kt4v]

Please be a secondary focused cruiser. I love those things and need more in my life!

[@pegasusted2504]

All the best to SLM and others. Finally coming to the point where they have hampered themselves by only coming as far forward with the ships they have and by not having a tier 11 instead having a Super ship tier with a star. This stops them being able to move forward in the years so limits them to ones that are world war 2 or earlier.

[@jf3565]

WG deffo running out of historical material…Swedish DDs common in WoW…a few BBs in game…but there where a few Cruisers launched in late WW2…”Tre Kronor Class”…before that the cruiser Götaland (1933)…so a few more buckets on the ”Swedish line” of ships

[@hvald8581]

I guess there will be a pan european line of cruisers added eventually so they are probably kept in reserve (sort of).

[@rtyhhas]

Merry Christmas

[@PsydenIII]

NGL, I am kinda disappointed in the Victoria. The Spanish were interested in replacing the 90mm guns with German 12.8cm.

[@maceg003]

Merry Christmas 🎁

[@williamneitzel2249]

Merry Christmas to all. Just wondering with tweaks to this 'cut & paste' how many Fletchers we will be seeing in other navies ? I mean, I wouldn't put it past WG to come out with the Pan American DD line with sold off Fletchers. As far as Real Steel ships left for WG to sell us; you have the rest of Battleship Row, the sisters of the BBs/CAs for the US already in game, the 2 (or 3) KGVs - UK. And please WG... NO MORE SUBs !!!

[@johnmccoy4756]

Merry Christmas.

[@middllepl]

Not Blücher like in "ship" but Blücher like in "here", ch in german makes h sound. And Merry Christmas, SeaLord

[@haroldchase4120]

Honestly they could do a tier 7 version of the royal sovereign or something . It be different and easily accessible to all players

[@deaks25]

I'm not too bothered by Blucher being the next Dockyard. Sure it's a copy/paste job, but Blucher is a ship that existed. And it does complete the 'set' as well. And WG do sometimes get these right; Huron is a great little ship despite being a Haida copy/paste and then tweaked. I'm way more enthused by a historical copy/paste than a random WG fantasy original full of BS.

[@ItzNixtonk]

0:16 Santa betrayed me and i wasted 4 thousand fucking pesos worth of Mega crates to try to get the Musashi but failed. But i do hope you have a better christmas than me Sea Lord Mountbatten, and Merry Christmas.

[@Patriotalliance]

Merry Christmas to all!

[@malguskerensky]

Happy and Safe Holiday Season to all !

[@sirziu5497]

Everyone told to WoWS : Dont bring so much Ships out so fast. Now stupid WoWS did it and now running out of interesting new Ships.

[@xflamousz]

Actually kinda looking foward to this one tbf

[@Energetiker]

historical ships are one thing, but when WG brings out fantasy or design study ships, they can go more creative. Take Niord, why not basing it on different design study? What makes me really angry is, when they bring the same og ship twice into the game, like Scharnhorst / Scharnhorst '43 or West Virginia / WV 44. I mean, WV had sister ships, why not make use of USS Maryland or USS Washington? That's lazy. I guess, WG puts more money and people into their new tank game development, they don't care much about WOWS anymore. Besides milking it more and more.

[@horrifiedbystander2150]

People are finally catching on that WG has barely added any new ship models for 2 years. Only copy pastes and kit bashes. Makes you wonder if they're still capable of modeling.

[@schelfie1986]

No they can't. The real artist and modelers staying with Lesta when they broke off.

[@outsidein3206]

! ship from containers and there was quite a number, including the festive X vouchers. I have some 500+ sjips. So to get 1 despite the many additions in past year, well not inspiring,. (no money down)

[@blitzkrieg1711]

WG should just take a break from new ships and focus on new maps and bug fixing. If they want to still make some extra money they can keep doing Good Dockyard ships. Focusing on quality gameplay would be the best way for them to make more money ATM.

[@Joey_Liu]

I’m just praying you can get either the Schil or Graf Spee for free in the early stages

[@d.e.seymour6792]

Wellington lied to me, Blucher isn't in the woods

[@logicalbrick5311]

Merry Christmas Also pre dreadnoughts

[@orhanmehmedov4588]

Merry xmas :)))

[@dach829]

Imagine wows being considered an mmorpg. Science

[@davidkendrick706]

Italian subs could be a line. The Leonardo da Vinci and the Ambia

[@gstormcz]

I would like to have option to switch between upgradable ship modules and seeing those changes immediately. Now you have to switch and then go ship module at port to see the change.👈 Typical change is in AA equipment, some ships are getting different gun turrets, rarely some are getting even different torpedo colored caps in torpedo racks 😅. But for my historical desire - submarines getting nothing - Bo conning tower change, radar antenna, deck gun or or open torpedo tubes - torp cap change. Subs are getting usually torpedo upgrade or sonar. I know subs are most hated class ingame (probably bit more unpopular than CVs) - I don't like their mechanics too. I believe WG spent all development resources on said mechanics and saved on design. To be fair - subs look great under water and surface and even sinking ship animation from sub perspective is great.👍 WG - just don't spam me with all T5-7 ship from Santa Mega crates - got 15 from 16 missing left and only 1 in best group and its T61. No Alaska, JB, Massa or so. I got 2 out of 3 golden crate ships but on PTS 😅 only. Well I can't complain - 180d prem is nice drop and I can live even wo those most sought ships. ❤

[@davis6048]

I may bust your chops Sea Lord me posting but i love this game but when WG pulls my chain, i get really pissed been playing along time. But Merry Christmas to you and all the players who play.

[@davidhines7592]

its interesting you descibe commonwealth navies as having 'hand me down' ships. some were actually built for those navies not the Royal Navy. the same is true to some extent still sometimes. if you develop ships and then build some for your navy, then you lost money on the deal. you at least could sell versions of those ships to foreign nations with no shipbuilding capability to cover the running costs for the navy. so i dont think blucher is a copy paste anymore than any ship type is. tom clancy had it right when a character in Red Storm Rising comments that the more you build of a type, the more you make changes; part from experience to improve building efficiency and make improvements that make the ship better. but the hull is pretty much the same shape even if slightly shorter/longer/wider/narrower. and all ships are obsolete by launch, let alone by the time they are outfitted and pass sea trials to be commissioned. that was true from the time of the american civil war onwards but really took off when the admiralty commissioned Dreadnought into service and ordered more, which was such a game changer it made the other navies not just obsolete but so far behind you could barely see them. unfortunately it was also one more step in the arms race and tensions that led to world war 1.

[@melmarrison8769]

Merry Christmas! Missile ships, they were testing them for a reason...

[@tangotone1241]

Honestly... what would we prefer, world of fantasy warships or historically accurate warships? Keep it as it is please... WG

[@frosty3693]

The perma camos would be better if they used the historical camos that the nation used. (sure some ,like the IJN, were limited) How many of each class the ship has been in the dockyard? I hope the Blucher performs better than the historic one. (sunk by shore mounted torpedo launchers that captain know about. WG seems to love to pick historicaly popular ships and make them not so good, to put it mildly.. WG's model seems to be based on adding ships to make money. They probably are looking for other ways. They tried adding a new ship line, subs, but the implimentation crashed, burned, exploded and left a hazmat residue that is sickening or killing players today. (for giggles, give the more modern ships, especially DDs ASROC (a shorter ranged rocket launched MK46 homing torpedo) or hegehog and squid for the older ones. Maybe they given ships more effective guns against subs instead.

[@texan1406]

I’m still gonna pronounce it Blooker because it reminds me of Frau Blucher from Young Frankenstein.

[@laszlohodosy2490]

Merry Xmas guys!

[@broccanmacronain457]

I'd like to see the USS Guam

[@puckhead777]

I think you fired 100 more torpedoes than the lame Asashio did.

[@Aha_s_Fake_Emanator]

Imma come back to wows after HMS M1, Surcouf and I-400 comes

[@fitcher-armchair-sleuth]

That what these companies always do. As little as possible for the money.

[@sardaukerlegion]

Yes

[@SkrapMetal84]

i wish they would do something with War of the Worlds but meh i dont know how.

[@mikewaite5507]

Lol that's what the star trek event needed - Thunderchild!😊

[@SkrapMetal84]

@@mikewaite5507 kinda wondering why they haven't put in Thunderchild yet.

[@alexanderwetherell4779]

Also historically most ships in this game are such tweaked up versions of other ships there like 8 different leander class ships and your not complaining about it grow up people

[@angrybeargaming7756]

short answer is YES

[@stuffandwhatnot4401]

Merry Christmas. German light cruisers.

[@RogueDemagogue]

Germans had subs that could launch bombers in WW2, what we need is plane subs, lol.

[@keller1334]

How about weegee balances the game?

[@troublemakeitdouble1299]

can't wait for cruise missile ships. ships with flying ping torpedoes