I’d like to thank every SJW out there for introducing me to this man
@rudy9513 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@jomo98063 жыл бұрын
Haha so right!!!
@rebekahwalker2903 жыл бұрын
Honestly listening to this man at least once everyday makes you a little bit smarter
@fabulyzqueen5823 жыл бұрын
Sjw?
@vytautas40653 жыл бұрын
@@fabulyzqueen582 Social Justice Warrior
@williamdowden44943 жыл бұрын
Oh no. He’s making sense. We need to move on to another senator.
@CenkoDeMayo3 жыл бұрын
Omgg 😂 that’s exactly what happened. They didn’t know what to say it’s like oh okay let’s wrap this up then 😂 and ignore what he said, typical
@Uub273 жыл бұрын
@@CenkoDeMayo That's not what happened, I agree with Peterson on these points, but he just ran out of time, that's all.
@CenkoDeMayo3 жыл бұрын
@@Uub27 running outta time doesn’t make his point invalid. They completely ignored it. If it were a point supporting them I’m sure this woulda gone differently
@Uub273 жыл бұрын
@@CenkoDeMayo -Running out of time doesn't make his point invalid I never said it did. -They completely ignored it I don't know if you've seen any other senate hearing but yes they don't acknowledge anything out loud. They silently acknowledge it. -If it were a point supporting them I'm sure this woulda gone differently. No, just no. He ran out of time, that's it. There's (almost) no bias in these senate hearings and you can even see that in this video. When the woman was scared to go on she said "Well, I think the chair would stop me-" but the chair cut her out and said "No. you're fine" Surely if there's bias they would've stopped her so there was no chance for Peterson to retort back in the first place.
@Uub273 жыл бұрын
@@Hildreth1101 Yes but there's different sections, he ran out of time for this one.
@chriswebb7968 Жыл бұрын
Most politicians just don't have the intellect to keep up with what he is saying.
@cristinabadea63443 ай бұрын
I see the same! 😊
@MusicEnthusiast_272 ай бұрын
yep and they make the laws what a world we live in
@djryken2 ай бұрын
While true, politicians deal with the public, and if they sound as smart as Jordan than the public will have a hard time understanding, and good leaders should speak in a manner that does not confuse most
@MusicEnthusiast_272 ай бұрын
@@djryken bro its not a matter of what/how they sound like they actually lack the ability to even comprehend what Jordan is saying
@djryken2 ай бұрын
@@MusicEnthusiast_27I was taught by a doctorate in rhetoric that if your audience does not understand you then you are far less effective in persuading them. So if what you say is true, and Jordan wants a change in policy, then he should speak more "effectively" to his audience
@alparkertesz4447 Жыл бұрын
"no you're fine" had me laughing so hard, she was looking for a way out and they closed the door on her 🤣😂
@PaulJacobs1970 Жыл бұрын
Haha yeh I liked that too. She was like “damnnn!”
@thereisnonegoodbutgodjohn363 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulJacobs1970 All Humans need to repent & Believe in Jesus. Why? Because all Humans have sinned (lied, lusted sexually, stolen, dishonoured parents etc). Avoid the fires of Hell (justice of God) and choose Heaven today. GOD IS HOLY
@thereisnonegoodbutgodjohn363 Жыл бұрын
Why should God let you into Heaven? Have you lied (even once in your entire life), looked with lust (sexual desire), dishonoured parents, stolen anything, had hatred towards someone, had premarital sex, adultery etc If you answered yes to any one of the above then you are a sinner like the rest of us. So, I ask you again, why should God let a sinner into Heaven? Sinners don’t go to heaven they go to hell, But we are blessed to have Jesus (God incarnate) die on the Cross and rise from the dead. If you Repent (forsake your sinful, unholy ways and live righteous instead) & Believe in Jesus as God, you will be seen as a Saint and welcomed into Heaven. John 3:17 For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved
@unit003311 ай бұрын
@@thereisnonegoodbutgodjohn363 this is not a place to preach nonsense, try a street corner and wear a sandwich board!
@qwerty4942410 ай бұрын
@@thereisnonegoodbutgodjohn363 just repent before death and you will be fine lol
@knowingphilosophy39013 жыл бұрын
“I’m sorry mister Peterson, but you are overqualified for the court..”
@tumid13713 жыл бұрын
Sadly the truth
@gregt7222 жыл бұрын
Not only is he extremely intelligent, he is capable of clearly explaining the realities by providing facts and related studies in support of his findings. He simply points out inconsistencies and flaws, undermining the ignorant with a particular agendas.
@Hopefullymarried2 жыл бұрын
Just another way of saying, “damn, my mind tricks won’t work on you, correct??” She goes out and drinks heavily for three days 😂
@jphalsberghe12 жыл бұрын
Not only is he over-qualified for the Courts, but he is also over-qualified for any contemporary Western politician, or even globally..If Jesus Crist was to come back into this world, I would not be surprised he chooses Mr. Perterson as his first Apostle
@paulcolburn38552 жыл бұрын
@@jphalsberghe1 That is correct. Our savior's first Apostle would be Dr Peterson.
@matthewbacque16224 жыл бұрын
"You can't have all of the power and all of the victimization at the same time." - Jordan Peterson
@O-P-964 жыл бұрын
SJWs & cie: "ShUt Up YoU NaZi! REEEEEE!"
@desslattery34574 жыл бұрын
You can pretend your the victim, "'I'm oppressed"' they who hold the power, the far left, stupid people, with power very dangerous
@georgbergsten60504 жыл бұрын
@@desslattery3457 If you think the far left hold the power you're stupid
@mikeskidoo39914 жыл бұрын
They sure as hell want it tho, that’s why everyone and all the social media and celebrities out there is trump hating saying crazy shit
@georgbergsten60504 жыл бұрын
Mike skidoo I agree that celebrities lecturing people is dumb. As If they know anything about the world outside LA and London. But people hate Trump because he actually does dumb shit.
@fishywaters6322 Жыл бұрын
He's so articulate its almost a symphony.
@psychoaurora2673 Жыл бұрын
he literally just says words for the sake of saying words. he doesn't have any fucking opinions, just says words without anything
@zephysx6089 Жыл бұрын
@@psychoaurora2673 comprehension issue
@psychoaurora2673 Жыл бұрын
@@zephysx6089 i mean like... im not wrong though
@NASTrading Жыл бұрын
@@psychoaurora2673 Comprehension issue
@psychoaurora2673 Жыл бұрын
@@NASTrading u took a long time to respond to that..
@noteuser159 ай бұрын
I think a huge problem that JP faces, is that he’s actually SO logical and SO coherent, that people aren’t used to it so it just doesn’t land the way it should.
@TheMarsCydonia9 ай бұрын
You are exactly right. When Jordan Peterson retweets fetish porn and says it's a real Chinese milking facility or when he gets mad at paper towel dispensers and explain how they're tyranny, people just cannot understand how next level logic and coherent it is.
@JohnDoe3-1-48 ай бұрын
@@TheMarsCydoniawhat is a woman?
@NotARussianDisinfoBot8 ай бұрын
@TheMarsCydonia When was the last time you cleaned your room?
@StandAloneState8 ай бұрын
@@TheMarsCydoniastrawman arguments are all you have. And you claiming that Nazis are wonderful people makes you a terrible human being that should lose his job
@bublies36928 ай бұрын
@@TheMarsCydonia These tweets are clearly Satire, He never said that paper towel dispensers are tyranny, and I have to ask,Whar has he's said that makes him so unintelligent to you?
@supermarc4 жыл бұрын
The more people attack him, the better he gets at defending himself.
@arklaw83064 жыл бұрын
Sadly, even he has limits.
@mcguire31684 жыл бұрын
killbotone nice
@owenstangroom15694 жыл бұрын
killbotone he’s addicted to drugs?
@hejalll4 жыл бұрын
Sounds like Hulk
@prophetsnake4 жыл бұрын
@JamesThat's because it's impossible to argue with someone who is lying, and Peterson is a liar.
@cheesestringy4 жыл бұрын
Oh no. I've fallen into a Jordan Peterson feedback loop again.
@salvadorrivera76744 жыл бұрын
Hahah
@rare64994 жыл бұрын
Welcome back
@rudesword28524 жыл бұрын
Yup. I watch The Real, puppy videos, old football highlights, jordan Peterson, and that guy that clears sewer grates too much...
@Growlie4 жыл бұрын
Clean your room
@elastronaute11984 жыл бұрын
lol
@DRAVIN5310 ай бұрын
Give this man the Nobel prize for peace. And let them haters hate
@br.m3 ай бұрын
lol
@MusicEnthusiast_272 ай бұрын
amen brother
@craigm645 Жыл бұрын
Superb, accurate, articulate, honest, diligent, caring and hopeful. JP deserves better than to be placed in a position where he has to explain things to idiots who don’t understand or appreciate that he is an extraordinary human being who wants the best for everyone concerned. He has helped so many and asks for nothing in return. JP is a living legend and a total inspiration to such a varied and diverse amount of individuals.
@TheMarsCydonia Жыл бұрын
I would agree if what you were saying was true. It's not.
@jackfisk2840 Жыл бұрын
@@TheMarsCydonia , in your opinion.
@TheMarsCydonia Жыл бұрын
@@jackfisk2840 Not all opinion. For example, factually, Peterson cannot be called honest as he is a serial liar. You can have your own opinion of Peterson but there are things that remain factual, no matter your feelings.
@jackfisk2840 Жыл бұрын
@@TheMarsCydonia , ok, can you tell me what was factually untrue?
@TheMarsCydonia Жыл бұрын
@@jackfisk2840 Peterson lied about C-16. If Peterson very publicly and very repeatedly misgendering people not leading him to being forced to use a pronoun or to being charged with a hate crime clued in his followers that Peterson disinformed the public about bill C-16, reading the bill for themselves should have but they believed Peterson on no evidence and against all evidence. Peterson's claims about C-16 usually were or were near these statements: - That bill C-16 is unprecedented in English law - That bill C-16 would compel him to use certain words (namely pronouns). - That bill C-16 would make misgendering a "hate crime" So what did bill C-16, An Act to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code actually do? It changed both these laws so that this list: _"race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, family status, disability and conviction for an offence for which a pardon has been granted or in respect of which a record suspension has been ordered"_ Is now this list: _"race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, family status, disability and conviction for an offence for which a pardon has been granted or in respect of which a record suspension has been ordered"_ The bill is easily accessible through any search engine. No other words were added to these laws. There were not any new standards of application created with these 4 words nor were decades of legal precedents overturned by adding these 4 words. So none of his claims ever had any sound basis. Peterson needed but never could make the case that the already existing Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code could compel speech or make derogatory language a hate crime. Neither of these amendment supports either of Peterson's claims. 1st, the amendment made by bill C-16 is not "unpredecented in English law" by any definition of the word: - Both the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code have been amended before, an obvious example being when "sexual orientation" was added to them. - If instead one tries to make it about "gender identity" and not simply the list of identifiable groups being amended, it's also false as every single Canadian province made the same amendment adding "gender identity" to their respective Human Rights Act or Code. With bill C-16, the federal government was simply updating the law that applies to itself to follow what was already in place at the provincial level through all of Canada. - In Peterson's province, the Ontario Human Rights Code was amended, adding "gender identity" the same way, with bill 33 in 2012 - That's 5 years before bill C-16 - Some province and territories passed the same amendment even sooner, in some instances up to 10 years before bill C-16 So obviously, it was not "unprecedented in English law". 2nd, where the Canadian Human Rights Act is concerned: a) First, obviously C-16's amendment to the Canadian Human Rights Act would not compel Peterson's speech. As mentionned above, the CHRA does not apply to every area of Canada, it only applies to areas where individuals _"are employed by or receive services from the federal government, First Nations governments or private companies that are regulated by the federal government such as banks, trucking companies, broadcasters and telecommunications companies"_ So if the amendment "compels" speech (and it does not), the CHRA would only "compel" the federal government or federally regulated employees. Peterson has never been either: Universities are not federally regulated, they are provincially regulated. What applies at the provincial level is the province's respective Human Rights Act or Code and as previously stated, Peterson's province Human Rights Code was amended by bill 33. If this amendment "compels" speech, then Peterson's speech would actually have been compelled for the 5 years previous to his objection to bill C-16. b) So why didn't Peterson notice his speech being "compelled" for 5 years? Before going on a crusade against a bill amending a law that would not "compel" him? The simple answer is: the amendment to the CHRA or to his province's human rights code does not compel speech as Peterson falsely claimed. They simply prohibits discrimination and harassment and the amendment only extended the classes covered to "gender identity and expression" as explained above. For example, the repeated and deliberate use of a derogatory term such as a racial slur or a misgendering pronoun. Obviously, prohibitions of certain words are not mandates to use certain words and thus no words, including pronouns, are compelled. Unless you stretch the definition of "compelled" so that it does not have anything to do with bill C-16. The Canadian Human Rights Act has over 4 decades of existence. If one argues the prohibition of using the incorrect pronoun is "compelling" to use the correct pronoun the individual desires, then the CHRA has "compelled" speech for those 4 decades. For example, a federal judge using the pronoun "it" to refer as a member of a racial minority repeatedly and deliberately while performing their official duties may be in violation of the CHRA and this is true of it since before bill C-16 was even thought up. If the standard is "prohibiting me from using derogatory term compels me to use terms that are not" for the standard of "compelled speech", then it would have been compelled for decades as these laws have existed for decades. So his claims that the 4 words added to CHRA would compel his speech are obviously false and one would have to say Peterson either never noticed or cared about his speech being compelled by bill 33 until an amendment to the CHRA, which does not apply to him, was about to pass with bill C-16. It should be noted however that Peterson still has not said a single word about bill 33 since it was passed over 10 years ago. 3rd, the amendment to the Criminal Code. Because if the amendment to the CHRA does not supports Peterson's claims of "compelled speech", then surely, the amendment to the Criminal code must. It certainly must support his claims that misgendering should now be a hate crime. It does not either. The amendment added the same 4 words to the Criminal code that were added to the CHRA. Those 4 words obviously do not add a whole host of new "hate crimes" such as "misgendering". The relevant sections of the Criminal code that were impacted by bill C-16 are: *Section 318 Advocating genocide* _Section 318 makes it an offence to advocate or promote genocide, which is defined as killing members of an identifiable group, or inflicting conditions of life on a group which are calculated to bring about the physical destruction of the group. The offence is indictable, and carries a maximum penalty of imprisonment not exceeding five years. There is no minimum punishment. The consent of the provincial Attorney General is required for a charge to be laid under this section_ *Section 319 Publicly inciting hatred* _Section 319 makes it an offence to communicate statements in a public place which incite hatred against an identifiable group, where it is likely to lead to a breach of the peace. The Crown prosecutor can proceed either by indictment or by summary process. The maximum penalty is imprisonment of not more than two years. There is no minimum punishment_ You can see here what it takes for speech to be a crime. Hate speech laws are often misunderstood as being about "feelings of hatred" but the Code is not concerned with people simply saying something "hateful", what is said needs to rise to the level where it is likely incite some form of violent action against an identifiable class or on the level of advocating the genocide of a identifiable class such as race, sex, sexual orientation, etc. and since bill C-16, a gender identity. The Criminal code too has been in existence for decades. As deliberate derogatory misgendering against an individual is on par to the deliberate derogatory use of a racial or homophobic slur, for Peterson's claim to have any basis, he would need to support it with any legal precedents made available in the decades of the Criminal code's existence where racial/homophobic slurs are on par with the advocacy of genocide and charged as a hate crime. Peterson could not because there is not. So Peterson at best spread misinformation due to a gross misunderstanding of Canadian law. Since Peterson continued to repeat his false claims about bill C-16 after being corrected about it repeatedly by actual law experts, ranging from law professor colleagues at his university to the Canadian Bar Association (and even made new false claims in a recent interviews), it is disinformation, not misinformation. Peterson has not stopped lying since.
@mandiisingh74754 жыл бұрын
When a smart person talk to someone who is pretending to be smart, the results are just priceless.
@thomasgrabowski22024 жыл бұрын
Uhm U.N. , American Psychological Association...oh...you ste just a person...uh...they know a lot...and ugh...how do YOU reply to that Mr Peterson...HmmmmmMmMMMm?!?
@moralistically73364 жыл бұрын
Thomas Grabowski dumbass that’s how he should reply
@j_freed4 жыл бұрын
Corona Virus Agar - correct, that's what Peterson should have replied. Good of you to complete the thought there.
@harmanghai4 жыл бұрын
Exactly..
@seldonwright43454 жыл бұрын
Pro 23:9 KJV Speak not in the ears of a fool: for he will despise the wisdom of thy words.
@CristiNeagu3 жыл бұрын
"Well, i think the Chair would stop me if i..." "No, you're fine." "Crap."
@wafflemcmulligan91863 жыл бұрын
You have entered the thunderdome
@ravinp3713 жыл бұрын
She had the shit face
@WTFShiznat3 жыл бұрын
Def. the funniest part of this clip !
@elliotboatey19993 жыл бұрын
lol u caught that? smart man!
@viralviruz86943 жыл бұрын
it's like someone edited the clip and added that sound😂😂😂
@lizzetcosta8103 Жыл бұрын
Every time I hear him express himself I can't help myself to believe there is still hope for humanity. My mother is my hero and he is a version of a super human being. I hope God continues to bless him with knowledge and a sense of balance for his sake.
@thereisnonegoodbutgodjohn363 Жыл бұрын
Why should God let you into Heaven? Have you lied (even once in your entire life), looked with lust (sexual desire), dishonoured parents, stolen anything, had hatred towards someone, had premarital sex, adultery etc If you answered yes to any one of the above then you are a sinner like the rest of us. So, I ask you again, why should God let a sinner into Heaven? Sinners don’t go to heaven they go to hell, But we are blessed to have Jesus (God incarnate) die on the Cross and rise from the dead. If you Repent (forsake your sinful, unholy ways and live righteous instead) & Believe in Jesus as God, you will be seen as a Saint and welcomed into Heaven. John 3:17 For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved
@Student4Life89 Жыл бұрын
for OUR* sakes.
@mandagenesis485 Жыл бұрын
Man is a hero
@thereisnonegoodbutgodjohn363 Жыл бұрын
@@Student4Life89 All Humans need to repent & Believe in Jesus. Why? Because all Humans have sinned (lied, lusted sexually, stolen, dishonoured parents etc). Avoid the fires of Hell (justice of God) and choose Heaven today. GOD IS HOLY
@thereisnonegoodbutgodjohn363 Жыл бұрын
@@mandagenesis485 Yes, Jesus is a Hero and God. PERSONAL MIRACLE Everyone’s got struggles of some kind, whether it be financial, health related or sinful addictions that you know is bad but can’t stop it. Ask for Jesus to intervene and help. God will help you overcome, thus giving you a personal miracle, and proving He exists to you. I have received a physical healing miracle, Jesus is waiting for you to humble yourself and ask.
@NevoAlmighty10 ай бұрын
I just enjoy the way he expresses himself. The way he builds sentences, the logic behind it, the examples. So vivid and sharp, right on point. It doesn't matter if I disagree with him about anything, I know that I can respect him for being a person who's able to speak about differences (of any topic) in a calm and respective manner.
@thereisnonegoodbutgodjohn36310 ай бұрын
Most people have heard “Jesus/God loves you”. Does that mean they have a relationship with God and will go to heaven? Depends on the individual. A relationship is 2 sided, you receive love and you give love back. God showed His love by suffering, dying on the cross and rising from the dead for you, now you show Love back by repenting of your sins (lying,, stealing, sexual sins, taking the Lord’s Name in vain etc) and believing in Jesus as your Lord and saviour so that Heaven is in your future not hell
@DanStrider78 ай бұрын
@@thereisnonegoodbutgodjohn363 Firstly, this has absolutely nothing to do with the video and is just pure fundamentalist proselytizing. Secondly, that sounds like emotional blackmail to me. “I did this thing for you that you never asked for, so now you have to love me back for it or you’ll go to hell”. Your God sounds like a very bad boyfriend 😂
@padraigobroin3704 жыл бұрын
Pronouns = Ok Being forced by law to use certain speech = Not Ok Hard to understand ? I think not.
@minermike614 жыл бұрын
All the fancy speech boils down to what you wrote. They won't say what they really mean and want which is to ask him to just go away and be quiet while they deconstruct Western civilization piece by piece. I don't mind anyone living their lives as long as they don't try to control me.
@simondezeeuw20424 жыл бұрын
@@randallN-sw6ee the government isn't trying to redefine identity. The people are, and the government accommodates the people.
@scoopmac85804 жыл бұрын
Because they know.
@coaldoubt28794 жыл бұрын
I agree. But that’s got nothing to do with c 16
@scoopmac85804 жыл бұрын
@@coaldoubt2879 how isnt it? The law says misgendering would be illegal. Misgendering as in the words you say that applies to the persons gender. How isnt it forced speech?
@shailendrasaiwal4 жыл бұрын
She didn’t understand a word he said.
@NotAnotherKuromi4 жыл бұрын
If people aren't able to improvise & engage in dialog but rather have to continue relying on their notes, they are the less intellegent person in the discussion.
@willswift944 жыл бұрын
His speech wasn't for her. Doesn't matter if she understood or not.
@timoteojuans19644 жыл бұрын
@Marylee Macpherson I dont think she had a narrative. Her point was valid until she realized he was objecting to a specific detail.
@glennbeck94964 жыл бұрын
@Shailendra Saiwal Neither did Peterson. He just puts big words together to try and confuse people with his nonsensical gibberish to the point that he doesn't even understand the shit that came out of his mouth.,
@timoteojuans19644 жыл бұрын
@@glennbeck9496 if you weren't following the case specifically it may have been hard to understand but it was actually very articulate and specific.
@justaguywhoissleepdeprived6381 Жыл бұрын
i can only dream of speaking like this man does
@thereisnonegoodbutgodjohn3639 ай бұрын
All Humans need to repent & Believe in Jesus. Why? Because all Humans have sinned (lied, lusted sexually, stolen, dishonoured parents etc). Avoid the fires of Hell (justice of God) and choose Heaven today. Jesus defeated death by rising from the dead. GOD IS HOLY
@martincull4914 Жыл бұрын
Our biggest problem is our leadership. Thank you, Doctor, for your clear and thoughtful thinking . Sent
@edithbannerman410 ай бұрын
@Hello there, how are you doing this blessed day?
@xxbergxx4 жыл бұрын
1990's "don't put me in a box or lable me" 2019 "you better put me in a very specific box or I'll cancel you"
@eraproductions99234 жыл бұрын
@Phix don't worry non of this is real except inside their own heads
@jonashellsborn76484 жыл бұрын
@@eraproductions9923 Its about feminism 3rd gen. and 1: yes it's in their own heads and 2: pls worry, it affects western legislation. Ruth bader ginsburg, the old lady that sleeps at work in the us supreme court has stated that "women are by definition victims".
@ohcrikey95604 жыл бұрын
Kenny berg. Thats hit the nail on the head. If you look at the list of 'genders', you will find one called 'adamasgender'. This is the given name of a particular type of gender that refuses to be categorised. Yep. Refuses to be labelled. Except.....well.......to be labelled as an adamasgender! Don't put me in a box! Ok, that box is alright. 😂
@eraproductions99234 жыл бұрын
@@ohcrikey9560 i wouldn't have a clue what any of them are because they are not real so no point checking them out
@Mike Fletcher "It's too late for words with these people." That may be true, but that line of thinking can be imminently dangerous.
@maxsimes6 жыл бұрын
Shes all coal now but he just keeps burning her
@liamdonaldson33936 жыл бұрын
stickexjr crush your enemies completely
@monsterzero94566 жыл бұрын
J Peterson: OMAE WA MOU SHINDEIRU Senator Gender Identity: NANI?!
@robynjefferson4779 Жыл бұрын
I love to hear intelligent people who make me think and improve my understanding.
@thereisnonegoodbutgodjohn36311 ай бұрын
Most people have heard “Jesus/God loves you”. Does that mean they have a relationship with God and will go to heaven? Depends on the individual. A relationship is 2 sided, you receive love and you give love back. God showed His love by suffering, dying on the cross and rising from the dead for you, now you show Love back by repenting of your sins (lying,, stealing, sexual sins, taking the Lord’s Name in vain etc) and believing in Jesus as your Lord and saviour so that Heaven is in your future not hell
@Hectorlph8 ай бұрын
This is a great take. I had extreme difficulty communicating my thoughts until I listened to Dr. Peterson. When I started listening to his lectures, I literally had to pause sometimes to process his sentences because they have so much depth to them. He doesn't waste a word. Years later and I finally feel adequate in terms of saying what I truly think. It's a blessing having people more intelligent around you to learn from.
@thereisnonegoodbutgodjohn3637 ай бұрын
@@Hectorlph All sin must be punished that’s how judgement works, a Judge judges you on the bad you do and since everyone has sinned (lied, stolen, sexual immorality, dishonoured parents, had hatred towards other people etc). All humans need to repent and believe in Jesus (God) to go to Heaven or spend eternity paying for your sins in hell.
@pepeg.luthier566 Жыл бұрын
The power of knowledge and eloquence. My hero.
@Omnipoops Жыл бұрын
the power of being wrong
@Jpudlo013 жыл бұрын
This woman is lucky he didn't start playing with his Wedding ring, she would've been smoked.
@Tigre777773 жыл бұрын
LMAO 😆
@zacdawson68813 жыл бұрын
What do you mean
@RINSHOUJO3 жыл бұрын
@@zacdawson6881 typically when peterson plays with his wedding ring or stares away it’s bad news for his opponent
@Jpudlo013 жыл бұрын
@@zacdawson6881 If you watch a lot of Dr. Petersons videos, he fiddles with his wedding ring when he's basic slaying his opposition.
@benjamindaw13863 жыл бұрын
I actually did see him touch his wedding ring in this video. Check out 04:15 haha!
@comradeskipper52323 жыл бұрын
Everybody gangsta until Peterson starts playing with his wedding ring
@ashleysovilla20373 жыл бұрын
😂
@IIOnyxEnderll3 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@dsma063 жыл бұрын
I agree with you. He does that a lot. Body language experts would say that when someone touches their wedding ring it's usually because they are thinking of their spouse. So I think the real genius here is Mrs. Peterson. ;)
@ambermartinez26163 жыл бұрын
@@dsma06 I think it's an intentional 'tick' he developed. (He may be trying to convey different messages when he does it depending on the person/situation that it calls for.) I really like it though. (Can't help but think he developed it/uses it mostly when dealing with someone who he's noticed has a peaked interest in him..) I love that he found a way to convey (w/e message it is) so subtly. ( I'd love to point out how genius he is but, that honestly feels a little redundant.) Ugh- Love this man-
@HeBlewInHisEarAndHeLikedit3 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣
@Binichmoses210 ай бұрын
The eloquency of this man is incredible.
@hardrock763410 ай бұрын
That woman went home with very sore ass... Jordan smacked the hell out of it 😂
@EC-rd9ys4 жыл бұрын
Funny how she says he's entitled to his opinion when they're literally trying to outlaw it.
@GinoNL4 жыл бұрын
E B truth
@moonrock53244 жыл бұрын
Snake
@mythic83744 жыл бұрын
Eddie Butkaliuk what? He purely is defending his right of freedom of speech, which any human with any sense would want, I don’t think that the lgbtq+ community should legislate themselves to acceptance, acceptance doesn’t work like that, btw he doesn’t disagree with their views he just doesn’t like the thought that one could potentially get punished for expressing their opinion (by not calling someone by their pronoun), that is called suppression, I don’t understand how this is such a hard concept to grasp, a government can tell people what they can’t say (such as a threat to public safety) but a government cannot and should not mandate what one has to say
@EC-rd9ys4 жыл бұрын
@@eddiebutkaliuk4681 ??? He's not a legislator...??
@dgrantwilson64684 жыл бұрын
Lol... they are literally giving him a platform to outline his grievances... I agree with pete but you are lost in emotions.
@BabyBoomerChannel4 жыл бұрын
Dr Peterson’s greatest weapon is how he listens to another speaker and so quickly distills their meaning.
@TheBermudaMan4 жыл бұрын
Yeah, uh...no. His greatest weapon is calculated sophistry.
@notliterallyme4 жыл бұрын
TheBermudaMan Point out one from this video
@omaralsabbagh36064 жыл бұрын
He pays attention, then he speaks magic words that extract habitable order out of chaos
@aaronrowe27004 жыл бұрын
And destroys them
@mscir4 жыл бұрын
He's very intelligent, very well read, he is sincere and has huge integrity, we're lucky to have him speak on _anything_.
@Fuck_whoever_took_my_name11 ай бұрын
A “career” based off a lie. There was and never would have been “compelled speech” in the bill. To quote a great entertainer “ya played yourself”
@jamessidebottom294911 ай бұрын
Jordan I am with you! You are a great man of our time. Love your work
@viking52564 жыл бұрын
This guy is litterally carrying the whole genderdebate on his own!!
@moonlight-zg8vx4 жыл бұрын
so true👌
@iamcicada13924 жыл бұрын
And dont forget Bill Burr, last of the two men fighting for us...
@triskalion96273 жыл бұрын
Id say Ben Shapiro, Steven crowder, Bill Burr, and many more KZbinrs do the same, things are better than they seem, don't believe the media saying we are the little, nah uh, we are the majority, u can check out Aba and Preach u may like them
@marwin43483 жыл бұрын
@@triskalion9627 Steven crowder is a completle moron tho. Hes embarassing against anyone that can talk coherently. He only looks smart against some of the most extreme SJW students.
@triskalion96273 жыл бұрын
@@marwin4348 let me guess, you are referring to that Joseph in the argument about socialism? Yea Steven turned out like a total dumbass there, but if you judge people by one or two rare cases and extremes you will never have any friends, no one is perfect and Steven has his bias too, many conservatives are biased when it comes to Capitalism it's true.
@naxel375 жыл бұрын
Dr. Peterson gave an outstanding argument on this bill with valid overwhelming points.. but they passed it anyway. Never forget that. It's not for the greater good. It's for an agenda.
@enira4 жыл бұрын
Voting cannon fodder.
@brandonkey1814 жыл бұрын
Yay Canada.
@barbarasherman48704 жыл бұрын
naxel37 Meghan Murphy also spoke there against this insanity and was overruled. Even Rona Ambrose voted for this stupid law.
@barbarasherman48704 жыл бұрын
Josip don’t let this happen to your country. We’re trying to get this changed, but the media refuses to cover the problems, in fact the media is forced to use female pronouns even for a sex offender if he chooses to identify as a woman. It’s so disgusting and misogynistic.
@reckyourself69484 жыл бұрын
@@barbarasherman4870 Unfortunately these people took most of the world. We just have to root them out and take it back.
@chrisvan57847 ай бұрын
When people ask a question, they are either looking for an answer or a fight. If they're looking for a fight, they won't accept to your answer, regardless of what you say.
@kristofferstorm4908 Жыл бұрын
He is a hero ✨ thank you for being here and doing what you doing!
@Omnipoops Жыл бұрын
A hero who was completely wrong? Lol.
@jaylinn7763 Жыл бұрын
@@Omnipoops get a fucking grip
@Omnipoops Жыл бұрын
@@jaylinn7763 thank you for your useless comment
@thereisnonegoodbutgodjohn363 Жыл бұрын
@@Omnipoops Why should God let you into Heaven? Have you lied (even once in your entire life), looked with lust (sexual desire), dishonoured parents, stolen anything, had hatred towards someone, had premarital sex, adultery etc If you answered yes to any one of the above then you are a sinner like the rest of us. So, I ask you again, why should God let a sinner into Heaven? Sinners don’t go to heaven they go to hell, But we are blessed to have Jesus (God incarnate) die on the Cross and rise from the dead. If you Repent (forsake your sinful, unholy ways and live righteous instead) & Believe in Jesus as God, you will be seen as a Saint and welcomed into Heaven. John 3:17 For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved
@Omnipoops Жыл бұрын
@@thereisnonegoodbutgodjohn363 sorry I don't speak absolute garbage
@kieranogg63465 жыл бұрын
They say if you're the smartest person in the room, then you're in the wrong room. I think Dr Peterson is in the wrong room a lot.
@Quapadople5 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately...but its his responsibility either way to do the right thing, which is.... to enlight people.
@cmagee145 жыл бұрын
Hell if that's the case I'm not sure the poor guy could EVER find the right room😫😫😫😂😂😂
@demetriusmiddleton12465 жыл бұрын
A LOT a lot
@matthewscott17435 жыл бұрын
So teachers are always in the wrong room? You're an idiot...
@Malik-hz5fg5 жыл бұрын
Matthew Scott many of mine weren’t.
@philsmgb43933 жыл бұрын
He's trying to explain nuclear fusion to a pre-schooler.
@Rheasound3 жыл бұрын
A pre schooler will understand in a certain point, a politician never.
@randomcaribou27473 жыл бұрын
He misunderstood the entire bill tho, if anything he's a pre schooler trying to tell his teacher that 2+2=5
@alfiepicton13393 жыл бұрын
@@randomcaribou2747 in what way may I ask?
@randomcaribou27473 жыл бұрын
@@alfiepicton1339 Bill c-16 only adds gender expression to an already existing list of protected grounds. Misgendering someone by accident would not be considered discriminatory as many canadian lawyers have already talked about, repeated and deliberate attempts to harm someone through constant misgendering on the other hand is another story. This bill only compels speech in the same way that the original law compelled righteous canadians to not yell slurs at indigenous people
@alfiepicton13393 жыл бұрын
@@randomcaribou2747 I would disagree, there is a big difference between making it illegal for people NOT to say something and telling people they HAVE TO say something. Especially if we are forcing them to say something a lot of people (older generations in particular) don't really agree with or really understand. And all of this to accommodate 0.6% of society (In America).
@marcusjnewtonz28 Жыл бұрын
Dr. Peterson is a world treasure and should be protected at all costs
@thereisnonegoodbutgodjohn3638 ай бұрын
All Humans need to repent & Believe in Jesus. Why? Because all Humans have sinned (lied, lusted sexually, stolen, dishonoured parents etc). Avoid the fires of Hell (justice of God) and choose Heaven today. Jesus defeated death by rising from the dead. GOD IS HOLY
@stephanmirambeau9090 Жыл бұрын
This man's every words save for future generations.
@TheMarsCydonia Жыл бұрын
Paper towel dispenser sticker: "Remember, you don't need an arm's length of paper towel to dry your hands" Jordan Peterson: "Up yours, woke moralists. Tyranny is always petty--and petty tyranny will not save the planet"
@RileyFreeman84 жыл бұрын
"Gonna have to wrap it up there and move on" Translation: You're making too much sense, stop it.
@joeeliott80604 жыл бұрын
It's that noticeable that when Peterson is making minced meat of her they stop him. How pathetic are they.
@juniorvonclaire35764 жыл бұрын
People who don’t REALLY want to debate tend to steer clear of individuals who are as intelligent, knowledgeable and articulate as Jordan.
@henokkidane75764 жыл бұрын
😂 haha
@Dev-zr8si4 жыл бұрын
Nah bruh how can he make sense to her she doesn't even understand half the stuff he's saying stupid bimbo
@Vidhur4 жыл бұрын
@@juniorvonclaire3576 Being good at debating is still another thing than being right or having good points. I know quite a few people who are absolutely reta... Mentally challenged... Well, to state it briefly; they make ridiculous and unprovable claims, yet they still shine when they debate another's well-founded arguments, somehow. My point is, it's still alot easier to debate with an intellectual than it is with a professional debater. Jordan Peterson adheres too much to facts and logic to ever be a debater, a debater will throw anything under the bus to win the argument. As far as their own dignity, trustworthiness and principles. Look at the majority of successful politicians for proof of that.
@belfastseo3 жыл бұрын
Dr Peterson trying with every inch of himself to control his frustration at the complete lack of sense from the panel.
@ryaneagles35683 жыл бұрын
The opposition never listens to what he actually during these debates, major problem
@WaaDoku3 жыл бұрын
politicians are not elected for their intellect. They are elected for their likeableness and oversimplified campaigning rhetoric.
@terrestrialcreature74813 жыл бұрын
I see what you did there :)
@MsZsc3 жыл бұрын
@Jim Jones can i add you man
@medexamtoolsdotcom3 жыл бұрын
I have never seen him ever show any sign of being frustrated and on the edge of losing control of said frustration. The man is a machine, nothing can shock him.
@PJHEATERMAN Жыл бұрын
This man is so much more than just his title.
@kloppsredarmy472510 ай бұрын
Absolute legend 👏
@trade51494 жыл бұрын
She can't even understand what he's saying. How pathetic.
@paulcolburn38554 жыл бұрын
No she can't. She had to have the Senate moderator rush in to save her by cutting off Jordan Peterson. There was no other way. The frightening thing here is that the Canadian Senate could LEARN about this just by listening to Peterson. He's right there. He knows, well, pretty much everything on this. But they don't want to do that. They just want him to shut up and go with whatever legislation they write when they don't even know why they wrote it. They took a poll and said that it is more likely they will get re-elected if they write it, that is what they know. They don't care about anything else.
@pixelboy76544 жыл бұрын
I think it is worse. She does understand but it doesn't fit her political agenda.
@trade51494 жыл бұрын
@slayne2 only when they are politicians
@briggsquantum4 жыл бұрын
@slayne2 If they presume to tell me what to do, and have no idea what they are talking about, and impede me in my lawful behaviour, then yes, I'll disparage them every time, and not only refute them, but ignore them and expose their misguided beliefs for all to see. Exactly what JP has done in this case.
@muskelbunten4 жыл бұрын
Ofc your name is Kyle
@wagagagaggag4 жыл бұрын
The way he articulates his words is just amazing.
@wagagagaggag4 жыл бұрын
prophetsnake If slandering and mediocre insult is what you stand for, I’m afraid you will have a miserable and delusional life.
@prophetsnake4 жыл бұрын
@@wagagagaggag Stand for? Bwawhawh! Go ahead, slurp Jordie. See how that works out for ya.
@wagagagaggag4 жыл бұрын
prophetsnake His teaching had helped me in getting insights on psychology topics. He does his research and is a renowned writer and professor. If I were you, I would watch all his videos and be enlightened rather than giving unproductive homophobic insult.
@beyond43744 жыл бұрын
prophetsnake don't talk when you have no knowledge
@prophetsnake4 жыл бұрын
@@beyond4374 Oh brother. Being told I have no knowledge by someone who can't even speak his own language. Perfect.
@andrewsices Жыл бұрын
I’m so impressed with Jordan Peterson’s logical and very cogent responses.
@TheMarsCydonia Жыл бұрын
I am uninpressed with Peterson followers that have you to realize how he was obviously, blatantly lying about Canadian law.
@cristinabadea63443 ай бұрын
Dr. Peterson - brilliant as ALWAYS, is unbelievable how good he is EACH TIME. That lady - she could not say 2 proper sentences, imagine how messy is her brain and so her actions. Pffff... 😊
@TheMarsCydonia3 ай бұрын
What was brilliant about Peterson here?
@cristinabadea63443 ай бұрын
@@TheMarsCydonia Sharp. Fact based. Knowledge. Experience. Packed up with kindness. One of a kind! His detractors... messy messages, messy language, messy behaviour- nothing to learn from. Simple
@TheMarsCydonia3 ай бұрын
@@cristinabadea6344 I've definitely reached a different conclusion than you did here. I do not find Peterson to be anything you claim he is while being what you say his "dectractors" are. I guess that when Peterson replied "You don't know what you're talking about" when I explained his lies about C-16, I expected more from someone "Sharp" and "Fact based".
@cristinabadea63443 ай бұрын
@@TheMarsCydonia .. ... go home, we are fed up with this nonsense, go home
@TheMarsCydonia2 ай бұрын
@@cristinabadea6344 Have I upset your feelings by having a different conclusion?
@VC_3337 жыл бұрын
he's so articulate it's astounding
@snorribjarnason84086 жыл бұрын
Well, he didn't show any new side to his expression here, except a situatory extension of vocabulary. His trait of openess is integrated with his speech. That is of course not a problem, but it shows the limitasion. ... I don't have English anymore in school so i have to practice in the comment-section on KZbin.
@volumedogs64226 жыл бұрын
Alright, if you want to improve your English skills. Instead of saying limitisation, say limitation. And use big "I"s, when they are alone. Openness* also. Some more, but I don't give that much of a damn.
@cortecz6 жыл бұрын
Snorri did use limitation, just incorrectly* spelled it 'sion' at the end. ( * Incorrectly for American English anyway.)
@atkgrl6 жыл бұрын
It’s called well read, life long learner, magi, truth speaker, polyhistor aka Educated.
@o.osuq-madiq20086 жыл бұрын
Anthony Corleone why dont you ask if he's single? Takem out ta denny's. SPLURGE a lil bit.
@blackromeoKOK7 жыл бұрын
And the Bill still passed. That's disgusting.
@xZeroTheGreat7 жыл бұрын
And predictable
@LabTech416 жыл бұрын
Not only was the bill passed, the very same abuse of it that Peterson talked about here and elsewhere, and that the empty suits in this panel said would never happened DID happen not even 6 months later. Peterson is absolutely vindicated in this beliefs on this issue because there's already one documented case where an institution used the law to restrain free speech under the threat of termination and/or a jail sentence.
@powderriver24246 жыл бұрын
Feel good politics and social justice have no place in leadership or Government. Jordan Peterson is as smart as they come but yet he speaks clearly and intelligently he’s spoon feeding it to this woman and she’s to dumb to understand it however in her mind she’s already decided.
@TeacherToolkitDemo5 жыл бұрын
Damn Canadian politicians shouldn't even be running a primary school.
@tayloraprile38514 жыл бұрын
No. It didn't. You're foolish for even believing this is actually a thing. Stop trying to pretend it is real. You aren't fooling anyone. The facts in the discussion's are interesting, however.
@micci9865 Жыл бұрын
In spite of what he could lose after, this man stands by what he think is right. balls of steel right there.
@TheMarsCydonia Жыл бұрын
He risked losing so much by becoming a millionaire?
@micci9865 Жыл бұрын
@@TheMarsCydonia This man is intelligent and hard working. Do you not think that he had already made millions before going viral?
@TheMarsCydonia Жыл бұрын
@@micci9865 Before lying to the public to start his career as a culture war commentator, Peterson was an university professor. Do you believe all Canadian university professors to be millionnaires?
@user-ug2hk3go6i Жыл бұрын
@@TheMarsCydonia You know his finances? What does his financial standing have to do with his position on the issue being discussed?
@TheMarsCydonia Жыл бұрын
@@user-ug2hk3go6i Have you missed that the original comment mentionned Peterson's risk of what he could be losing? Why have you not asked them this question instead of asking it to me who pointed out the fact that Peterson gained from it and rather than lose anything?
@trevermcdonald24025 ай бұрын
Those who seek to represent us ought to be of a higher level of competence than demonstrated here.
@Euterpeize7 жыл бұрын
If you think you can argue against Peterson, think again. This man is a logical beast.
@ikilledrogerrabbit14797 жыл бұрын
...yep, you should think again sunshine
@smartchip7 жыл бұрын
I can argue with him, so can anyone else, easily, As long as the person is in the right, saying that, lets presume Mr Peterson came into said debate half cocked ( yes, highly improbable), engaged in the discussion, then was shown to be lacking, he would then apologise unreservedly, then change sides, to advance the truth, its a thought exercise, Mr Perterson, was asked by joe rogan, what can anyone wanting to help in this C16 law, to help? Mr Peterson, said something so profound and which struck me in awe, He said " work on yourself" or words to that effect, what the ......... no asking for money, donations or anything, he said sort yourself out, come on, a truly great role model, he is Good and truthful actions, backed up by words, the politicians are hollow words, hot air and slight of hand to gain by deceit
@TheHeartThatRunsCold7 жыл бұрын
smartchip He also rented out a theater using his Patreon money to sort out his thoughts on the bible in front of a crowd. And it is becoming increasingly obvious he's doing it so people can understand the core benefits of religion and why it has held so much weight. It doesn't come off as pretentious, as he stands there as a lecturer, doing what he knows he can do really well.. Teach.
@jrutski16 жыл бұрын
listen to the sam harris and jordan peterson debate on truth
@downstream01146 жыл бұрын
+Apoorv Salar - How.
@shawnconway52804 жыл бұрын
He isn’t against trans people . He against a law that says “you HAVE to use this pronouns”. Compelling someone to do anything is wrong
@kevinblythe21924 жыл бұрын
Well yes, in regard to 'compelled speech' anyway.
@blitz84254 жыл бұрын
That's not what the law says.
@scottking64814 жыл бұрын
Conner Mccord actually if you read it the APA didn’t change anything in terms of the requirements for diagnosis or the symptoms. They changed the name and classification to “reduce stigma”. They freely admit they did it under the pressure of lobby groups, in fact one of the people who wrote the thing admitted as such on Twitter a while back.
@j.l85314 жыл бұрын
@Brittany D and there you have it. Another dumb ass. Congrats
@j.l85314 жыл бұрын
@Brittany D lol, keep breeding acceptance.
@samshare21465 ай бұрын
Ever notice that as soon as Mr. Peterson is making his point (driving it in), someone says "We have to wrap it up there. Let's move on to..."?
@TheMarsCydonia5 ай бұрын
No, because this was actually the last 5 minutes of a scheduled one hour.
@breyna7917 Жыл бұрын
Love this man ❤ he doesn’t take BS from No one
@thereisnonegoodbutgodjohn3638 ай бұрын
All Humans need to repent & Believe in Jesus. Why? Because all Humans have sinned (lied, lusted sexually, stolen, dishonoured parents etc). Avoid the fires of Hell (justice of God) and choose Heaven today. Jesus defeated death by rising from the dead. GOD IS HOLY
@samchop74947 жыл бұрын
She called him Mr Peterson. For someone who claims to hold pronouns in high esteem, she betrays her narrative by incorrectly addressing Professor Peterson.
@onlyicedgarrett77917 жыл бұрын
Sam Chop Mr. Dr. Prof. Peterson
@samchop74947 жыл бұрын
Your're*
@j_freed6 жыл бұрын
Some pronouns are more equal than others in this legislation.
@mariocroatia93217 жыл бұрын
Dr.Peterson is next level of linguistic and thought .This woman should not be a senator.
@jeffpence61637 жыл бұрын
I strongly disagree. I think she is an idol of the modern day, Western politician due to the fact her attributes are so antithetical to those of Jordan Peterson. She's full of incompetence, virtue-signaling, and - as Dr. Peterson put it - "cognitive incoherency." Yep, sounds like a senator to me :/
@lloydguilfoyle3577 жыл бұрын
In a round about way, you two agree...
@jeffpence61637 жыл бұрын
Edit: I strongly disagree with the second sentence of his original comment. lol
@wwfarch7 жыл бұрын
I believe that means "In an ideal world, this woman would never be a senator". You are correct that she represents something that is sadly typical of today's political climate.
@jab1persianprincess9237 жыл бұрын
jeepers what was that about how do they get to be a senator in canada?
@tonytrinidad4409 Жыл бұрын
How convenient. Let’s rap it up there……😂
@socksumi Жыл бұрын
What we're dealing with here is a huge difference in intellectual scope, depth and nuance between these two. JP understands the far reaching implications and their impact on logical coherency as well as basic rights and freedoms while the senator can't see past a single minded fixation on an end goal.
@mattmcdonald711210 ай бұрын
Yeah thats not what c-16 did. It never mentions pronouns and quite frankly has nothing to do with them, any other interpretation is just throwing shit at the wall and watching it stick. Namely educational facilitators who had no idea what it was and panicking every time someone claimed to be misgendered, the proper response would be, grow up.
@globalko7 жыл бұрын
He is so sharp when speaking
@t.m93417 жыл бұрын
Pepe's bodega USA has our own version of this guy. His name is Trey Gowdy and hes the governer of south carolina. look him up on youtube if you want some keks
@michaelegan55816 жыл бұрын
T. M lol that's such a diservice to Mr. Peterson. And the fact that you can't see so if kind of funny. Peterson is on a whole. nutha. level.
@t.m93416 жыл бұрын
Michael Egan ive seen trey gowdy on cspan rip people in half. Hes been ripping comey in half before trump even thought of presidencym
@insectpolitician72786 жыл бұрын
Awww cute, you have your first intellectual hack for a hero! We've all been there mate.
@joeblondiemanco89186 жыл бұрын
Pepe's bodega Roughly speaking
@TheDUDERX3 жыл бұрын
The guy is a savage. He comes up with perfect responses and comebacks instantly which most of us come up in the shower after thinking about it for a week.
@bigmonsieurp.35643 жыл бұрын
Menn, you would have to combine the intellectual powers of taking a crap and showering at the same time, you'd have take a crap in the shower to come up with a response 1/10th as good as Petersons comeback. Mans crazy
@mikerconway3 жыл бұрын
I'm sure it probably has everything to do with his clinical psychology background, in which he is highly qualified, and his interest in socio-political matters. Not only is he acutely familiar with the subject content being discussed (or at least themes that strongly correlate) and facts that back his viewpoints but he is also very practiced in cognitive theory. Much of what you see when Jordan is in full swing is a combination of muscle memory in terms of recalling salient facts, and an inherent ability to adapt his responses and counter-arguments with the application of sound logic and critical thinking . That's a very powerful combination and you see people really struggling to handle him, particularly the glib ones who can't back up their claims with anything tangible.
Ironic, considering Peterson is a shameless, unrepentant liar.
@NHL47404 ай бұрын
@@TheMarsCydonia you need to elaborate on what he has lied about and what he is unrepentant about. Lying maybe but penance implies submission to JC. I’m not sure if he has bowed down to Jesus. Yet?
@TheMarsCydonia4 ай бұрын
@@NHL4740 Unrepentant in the sense of showing no remorse or regret for years of lying, it has nothing to do with Jesus. And If Peterson very publicly and very repeatedly misgendering people not leading him to being forced to use a pronoun or to being charged with a hate crime clued in his followers that Peterson disinformed the public about bill C-16, reading the bill for themselves should have but they believed Peterson on no evidence and against all evidence. Peterson's claims about C-16 usually were or were near these statements: - That bill C-16 is unprecedented in English law - That bill C-16 would compel him to use certain words (namely pronouns). - That bill C-16 would make misgendering a "hate crime" So what did bill C-16, An Act to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code actually do? It changed both these laws so that this list: _"race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, family status, disability and conviction for an offence for which a pardon has been granted or in respect of which a record suspension has been ordered"_ Is now this list: _"race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, family status, disability and conviction for an offence for which a pardon has been granted or in respect of which a record suspension has been ordered"_ The bill is easily accessible through any search engine. No other words were added to these laws. There were not any new standards of application created with these 4 words nor were decades of legal precedents overturned by adding these 4 words. So none of his claims ever had any sound basis. Peterson needed but never could make the case that the already existing Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code could compel speech or make derogatory language a hate crime. Neither of these amendment supports either of Peterson's claims. 1st, the amendment made by bill C-16 is not "unpredecented in English law" by any definition of the word: - Both the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code have been amended before, an obvious example being when "sexual orientation" was added to them. - If instead one tries to make it about "gender identity" and not simply the list of identifiable groups being amended, it's also false as every single Canadian province made the same amendment adding "gender identity" to their respective Human Rights Act or Code. With bill C-16, the federal government was simply updating the law that applies to itself to follow what was already in place at the provincial level through all of Canada. - In Peterson's province, the Ontario Human Rights Code was amended, adding "gender identity" the same way, with bill 33 in 2012 - That's 5 years before bill C-16 - Some province and territories passed the same amendment even sooner, in some instances up to 10 years before bill C-16 So obviously, it was not "unprecedented in English law". 2nd, where the Canadian Human Rights Act is concerned: a) First, obviously C-16's amendment to the Canadian Human Rights Act would not compel Peterson's speech. As mentionned above, the CHRA does not apply to every area of Canada, it only applies to areas where individuals _"are employed by or receive services from the federal government, First Nations governments or private companies that are regulated by the federal government such as banks, trucking companies, broadcasters and telecommunications companies"_ So if the amendment "compels" speech (and it does not), the CHRA would only "compel" the federal government or federally regulated employees. Peterson has never been either: Universities are not federally regulated, they are provincially regulated. What applies at the provincial level is the province's respective Human Rights Act or Code and as previously stated, Peterson's province Human Rights Code was amended by bill 33. If this amendment "compels" speech, then Peterson's speech would actually have been compelled for the 5 years previous to his objection to bill C-16. b) So why didn't Peterson notice his speech being "compelled" for 5 years? Before going on a crusade against a bill amending a law that would not "compel" him? The simple answer is: the amendment to the CHRA or to his province's human rights code does not compel speech as Peterson falsely claimed. They simply prohibits discrimination and harassment and the amendment only extended the classes covered to "gender identity and expression" as explained above. For example, the repeated and deliberate use of a derogatory term such as a racial slur or a misgendering pronoun. Obviously, prohibitions of certain words are not mandates to use certain words and thus no words, including pronouns, are compelled. Unless you stretch the definition of "compelled" so that it does not have anything to do with bill C-16. The Canadian Human Rights Act has over 4 decades of existence. If one argues the prohibition of using the incorrect pronoun is "compelling" to use the correct pronoun the individual desires, then the CHRA has "compelled" speech for those 4 decades. For example, a federal judge using the pronoun "it" to refer as a member of a racial minority repeatedly and deliberately while performing their official duties may be in violation of the CHRA and this is true of it since before bill C-16 was even thought up. If the standard is "prohibiting me from using derogatory term compels me to use terms that are not" for the standard of "compelled speech", then it would have been compelled for decades as these laws have existed for decades. So his claims that the 4 words added to CHRA would compel his speech are obviously false and one would have to say Peterson either never noticed or cared about his speech being compelled by bill 33 until an amendment to the CHRA, which does not apply to him, was about to pass with bill C-16. It should be noted however that Peterson still has not said a single word about bill 33 since it was passed over 10 years ago. 3rd, the amendment to the Criminal Code. Because if the amendment to the CHRA does not supports Peterson's claims of "compelled speech", then surely, the amendment to the Criminal code must. It certainly must support his claims that misgendering should now be a hate crime. It does not either. The amendment added the same 4 words to the Criminal code that were added to the CHRA. Those 4 words obviously do not add a whole host of new "hate crimes" such as "misgendering". The relevant sections of the Criminal code that were impacted by bill C-16 are: *Section 318 Advocating genocide* _Section 318 makes it an offence to advocate or promote genocide, which is defined as killing members of an identifiable group, or inflicting conditions of life on a group which are calculated to bring about the physical destruction of the group. The offence is indictable, and carries a maximum penalty of imprisonment not exceeding five years. There is no minimum punishment. The consent of the provincial Attorney General is required for a charge to be laid under this section_ *Section 319 Publicly inciting hatred* _Section 319 makes it an offence to communicate statements in a public place which incite hatred against an identifiable group, where it is likely to lead to a breach of the peace. The Crown prosecutor can proceed either by indictment or by summary process. The maximum penalty is imprisonment of not more than two years. There is no minimum punishment_ You can see here what it takes for speech to be a crime. Hate speech laws are often misunderstood as being about "feelings of hatred" but the Code is not concerned with people simply saying something "hateful", what is said needs to rise to the level where it is likely incite some form of violent action against an identifiable class or on the level of advocating the genocide of a identifiable class such as race, sex, sexual orientation, etc. and since bill C-16, a gender identity. The Criminal code too has been in existence for decades. As deliberate derogatory misgendering against an individual is on par to the deliberate derogatory use of a racial or homophobic slur, for Peterson's claim to have any basis, he would need to support it with any legal precedents made available in the decades of the Criminal code's existence where racial/homophobic slurs are on par with the advocacy of genocide and charged as a hate crime. Peterson could not because there is not. So Peterson at best spread misinformation due to a gross misunderstanding of Canadian law. Since Peterson continued to repeat his false claims about bill C-16 after being corrected about it repeatedly by actual law experts, ranging from law professor colleagues at his university to the Canadian Bar Association (and even made new false claims in a recent interviews), it is disinformation, not misinformation. Peterson has not stopped lying since.
@scottrussell22812 ай бұрын
He is absolutely correct 👏
@stevesalt90054 жыл бұрын
Everytime he speaks I feel educated. Intellectual heavy weight.
@judanji22344 жыл бұрын
Everytime I listen to him I feel like my IQ is increased by 50
@ThermaL-ty7bw4 жыл бұрын
until he opens his mouth about god and jesus that is ...
@oceanbackwards19034 жыл бұрын
What do you mean?
@MahoneyBadger4 жыл бұрын
Ocean Backwards he doesn’t know what he means.
@sondersonics75344 жыл бұрын
@forza juventus I have a tiktok account (lord forgive me) and I literally saw an SJW talk shit about Peterson. Had to destroy her
@marcopeek56684 жыл бұрын
I don’t get why people hate him for his views here. He isn’t transphobic at all and he’s said (numerous times) that he actually will call someone by the pronoun they prefer because he considers it to be common decency. He just doesn’t want it to be illegal to not do it.
@Yodaewok4 жыл бұрын
Because he refuses to play their game.
@v8cool2314 жыл бұрын
Don't worry, I've been labelled sexist, racist for simply saying that to make an equal society, you shouldn't drag down , demonise, witch hunt or discriminate the predominant race or sex etc .
@anshmandy80884 жыл бұрын
That very simple concept is somehow so difficult for people to understand it blow my mind!
@jhonnycultura44554 жыл бұрын
Even If you don't want to do it still you're not transfobic
@unusualbydefault3 жыл бұрын
@TURD BURGLAR I assume you're murican? Because usually, only muricans throw liberals, lefties, socialists and communists in the same pot. For example for most of Europe, a liberal is a centrist, more or less
@azadali449810 ай бұрын
Dr Peterson should be one of the minds employed by the UN to help guide correct international policies on these matters. Simply brilliant.
@TheMarsCydonia10 ай бұрын
Peterson, supporter of conversion therapy, opponent of free speech, should help the UN? How is he brilliant exactly?
@MusicEnthusiast_272 ай бұрын
The man is too coherent, that he is incomprehensible for her
@misanthrophex2 ай бұрын
What did you not understand?
@MusicEnthusiast_272 ай бұрын
@@misanthrophex i meant for the senator lady peterson only speaks the truth
@123CHISTO7 жыл бұрын
Peterson is thinking on such a clear unmuddled level, of course a politician can't cope.
@dod21146 жыл бұрын
true
@atxcat68736 жыл бұрын
IKR when we really need that clarity IN politics
@jamiemalokas36936 жыл бұрын
If the politicians spend all their time talking with other politicians, it stands to reason at a certain point any language that isn't muddled would sound foreign to them.
@jamesdigriz54495 жыл бұрын
He lost her after his very first words.
@stax60573 жыл бұрын
The level of badass this guy has obtained is beyond physical
@angelolacap96813 жыл бұрын
Lobster energy 💪
@j243vtf3 жыл бұрын
amin
@Coltnz13 жыл бұрын
Yes, his badassery is strong here.
@punxOiOi133 жыл бұрын
I don't think the "level of badass" is a physical trait, man. In fact, I would argue its a behavioral trait. At no level, even the lowest, is it physical.
@angelolacap96813 жыл бұрын
@@punxOiOi13 well..bad assery can be a metric of how close to a mythological hero an individual is, or how competent an individual is in the domain of transcending the dragon of chaos. Jordan Peterson's level of bad assery is somewhere that is approximating the archetype of the ideal mythological hero. ... roughly speaking
@RIMIDALVism3 ай бұрын
It's hard to win an argument against a smart person, but impossible to win against an idiot! 😂😉
@korrinschilling81083 жыл бұрын
Here we are three years later, and he was totally right.
@nathanleach2383 жыл бұрын
Yes. JP was right. What would surprise me is JP being flat-wrong on something important. I'm sure he's not "Mr. Right" and makes plenty of mistakes, but his mind 'as it relates to' large scale issues is STUNNING. This dude is kick-ass.
@WhopperCheeseDota3 жыл бұрын
Right about what? The bill has passed and nothing terrible has happened like he was afraid of.
@Fedreal_Bureau_Of_Investigaton3 жыл бұрын
@@nathanleach238 his weak points are religious interpretations
@ismaelmelendez27103 жыл бұрын
@@Fedreal_Bureau_Of_Investigaton he’s written one of the most impactful books on religious interpretations which he spent 15 years writing. You sure that you know better?
@Fedreal_Bureau_Of_Investigaton3 жыл бұрын
@@ismaelmelendez2710 i heard him talking about that for hours. Yeah
@monicamacias61553 жыл бұрын
When they can’t defeat Peterson’s argument, they say:”Let’s wrap up here and move on...”
@amandahelenatkins86363 жыл бұрын
Yeah , that happens to me often 😆
@jamesramplin81243 жыл бұрын
@@amandahelenatkins8636 You're not Peterson
@Ruzzky_Bly4t3 жыл бұрын
So true.
@MrRufusjax3 жыл бұрын
He had them and they knew it.
@nickguzman17343 жыл бұрын
@@jamesramplin8124 while others might not be peterson, I have experienced this sort of argument where I'm arguing a principle and brain dead people assume you're against their entire argument. Like people are allowed to support trans people but also be against compelled speech or bathrooms for example
@jasonharding5328 Жыл бұрын
Senate Chairperson: "We need to move on..." Loose translation: She is getting torched so I'm going to save her from further embarrassing herself...
@planes333311 ай бұрын
Its too painful watching peterson take on the world by himself. I feel this world is so bent, unfare, and this is probably not going to get better
@fernandodobbin38064 жыл бұрын
Dr. Peterson will go down in history as one of the greatest minds of the 21st century.
@soydansogukcesme4704 жыл бұрын
hoply... i wich he would talk in Europe too..i am watching nearly all of his Videos on KZbin. I love it. I am from Germany and i would love it if someone from here would the same work as him.
@StevesSammiches4 жыл бұрын
It's funny because the Bill passed and we haven't seen anyone actually charged under it...
@kailaine39744 жыл бұрын
@@StevesSammiches you're missing a key word at the end there. "Yet."
@rugbyguy594 жыл бұрын
@@kailaine3974 This law will never lead to what Peterson envisions. He's one of the weakest intellectuals I've ever seen. Just plain misinformed on so many things.
@kailaine39744 жыл бұрын
rugbyguy59 I don’t really know what you mean by “what he predicts.” As far as I can tell, he is concerned about a compelled speech law, which is what bill C-16 is. I’ll also give you a bit of a pro tip: never in the history of ever has an ad hominem been a valid argument
@decespugliatorenucleare37804 жыл бұрын
seriously lady: what were you thinking whilst trying to bamboozle The lobster king?
@davecope094 жыл бұрын
Well done sir. . . Well done.
@ubermenschexplorer49104 жыл бұрын
lol
@gburyhockey94 жыл бұрын
the lobster king lmao
@Born2Losenot2win4 жыл бұрын
Good one, lol
@EmilM-pb2hn4 жыл бұрын
She is nothing more than completely affected by politics with a half working brain.
@tomn.9987 Жыл бұрын
The unsung hero of common sense. His courage is amazing.
@psychoaurora2673 Жыл бұрын
he has no sense
@MariaPerez-uv8mm9 ай бұрын
Bravo!!! What else can I say to show appreciation for this man! absolutely brilliant!!
@cardboardjase2487 жыл бұрын
SENATOR: "I don't think the chair would allow me the time to list what they're all saying..." CHAIR: "No, you're fine" **Doesn't proceed to list what they're saying, because she doesn't know**
@stratatk57247 жыл бұрын
Well, if she did happen to know, listing it would disprove her assertion haha. I don't know what's worse- that the senators are dishonest or incompetent. Perhaps both.
@ScipioWasHere7 жыл бұрын
Cardboard Jase LMAOOOO lowkey the chair is on Petersons side or he hates that senetor
@stevenmaclellan35527 жыл бұрын
The only thing she communicated was her aptitude for lazy thought.
@Seronas106 жыл бұрын
to be fair.. she meant to read out 3 full pages of something whether or not fit, not just the points.
@Wingedmagician6 жыл бұрын
Cardboard Jase 😂
@Panazoniac2 жыл бұрын
He's rational. He's logical. He thinks critically. For these reasons he is vilified.
@N7Lambo2 жыл бұрын
1000%
@grantlandis27472 жыл бұрын
Hitler thought critically. Do you want to be like Hitler. (just kidding)
@sathwickborugadda47442 жыл бұрын
@@grantlandis2747 how is this kidding?
@demons211002 жыл бұрын
Intelligent people that don't conform to those leftist ideology are vilified cause they speak the truth, thus they are not listened to, just ignored or put into a "far right or fascist" category, and I really do think that this is unfortunate, on all the videos I've seen of him, he's never been discriminatory against anyone, but well, logic and common sense are rare nowadays, I can't comprehend nor I want to abide by their stupid rules, with their unlimited amount of genders and sexualities, this world is going downhill and everybody in the west are pressing on the gas. Like there aren't anything more important on this planet than fucking imaginary genders and sexualities, this is what happen when you let deranged people give their opinion. This world doesn't have more than a few decades to live. Hope I wont be there at the downfall.
@sathwickborugadda47442 жыл бұрын
@@demons21100 its just with the western civilization , not the entire world
@dianelemay36619 ай бұрын
BRAVO Prof Peterson, and THANK YOU for standing up for all us Canadians with common sense, your honesty and bravery for coming forward is very much appreciated!!
@TheMarsCydonia9 ай бұрын
How has Peterson ever stood up for Canadians with common sense? By blatantly lying about Canadian law? By re-tweeting fetish porn?
@jaga95 Жыл бұрын
Hahaha, what a genius!!!!
@Kamil-B3 жыл бұрын
It's just mind-blowing, how articulate he is
@chrisbuiciuc683 жыл бұрын
Yeah, the way he quickly and elegantly processes and communicates (often complex) arguments is amazing! It’s so inspiring to listen to him speak...
@owencarroll98783 жыл бұрын
That was the first thing I thought when I seen the thumbnail of this video
@Hello112353 жыл бұрын
Genuinely! I have a psychology degree im a clinical child psychologist and behaviour analyst. Still when i listen to him I remain silent for hours after afraid i will sound like a toddler
@schroedingerscat2.0543 жыл бұрын
@@Hello11235 Look up Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg, probably the most articulate man I've ever come across. Famous for uttering the longest word ever used in british parliament. Here's a link. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jZSck2Nuf5d-qKM
@newcomer36743 жыл бұрын
Agreed. Peterson has an extremely high verbal IQ
@anshmandy80883 жыл бұрын
Imagine standing up for something despite being internationally vilified and risk losing your job. This man is a hero.
@MeetPatel-od6er3 жыл бұрын
@@brianwilson7624 but they dont exist??? Stfu ok
@89Valkyrie3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I guess you could say the same about Hitler right?
@shanemoran41453 жыл бұрын
@@89Valkyrie how is hitler in this conversation
@methira3 жыл бұрын
Yeah man it’s rare to a person with that much courage
@jomama34653 жыл бұрын
He's the man they couldn't cancel lol
@abbyynorman2874 Жыл бұрын
Come to America Dr. Peterson! Shame on you Canada for putting this wonderful man on your chopping block!
@user-gr1vi7zs9u10 ай бұрын
The more people attack him, the better he gets at defending himself.. This man's every words save for future generations..
@roughneck68733 жыл бұрын
This man doesn't rattle easily. Thinks quick on his feet and disembowels his opponents in such a thoughtful and polite manner that it's a work of art.
@WLyons98563 жыл бұрын
Because facts can not be debated
@ravsuv-help7943 жыл бұрын
Please watch his debate with slajov zizek(that peterson posted) if you think he is so quick on his feet
@lblesbowden67483 жыл бұрын
@@WLyons9856 As long as the person expressing those facts can articulate them coherently. Jordan can and does better than almost anyone else on the planet. Facts don't have feelings and they can be discombobulated if the deliverer of the facts is a poor communicator.
@9700Ibrahim3 жыл бұрын
You almost make him sound like he's the great Hannibal lecter lol!
@johnmartins943 жыл бұрын
Absolutely!
@briantdt7 жыл бұрын
The fact that they passed this anyways show these people don't listen to reason.
@wherethechee6 жыл бұрын
lol
@mookie02716 жыл бұрын
not enough in the educated hieracrchy stood up against this bill, no team effort was made by the rest of the administrational structure we all call a system, it goes further than bill C16 you can pretty much look at all law and most of it is indeed incoherent in actually defining help when the law is in place that actually helps anyone. it is almost like all law is written to fail the people
@kiltmaster70416 жыл бұрын
They listen to angry mobs. They listen to money. They listen to what will get them re-elected. Be one of those three things, and politicians worldwide will listen to you.
@LiterallyGod Жыл бұрын
Inspirational. So brave.
@richardlevari94705 ай бұрын
If there is anyone smarter than Dr. Peterson that can articulate there views better than he can, PLEASE let me know! Because we need more people like him to enlighten us! Amen
@BuddysDIY2 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately I think this brilliant mind speaks to deaf ears. Dude is a legend
@Noctazar2 жыл бұрын
I wonder if he will be mentioned in history books (or whatever children will use in schools to read about history) in, like, 2050.
@rockycomet45872 жыл бұрын
@@Noctazar Not if the left has its way.
@A.C.712 жыл бұрын
Agree. They come into the room thinking they are smart until Jordan speaks, They hear truth but remain stubborn and choose to be willingly ignorant at this point..showing the kind of person they really are which speaks to why they have the stance they do in the first place. They are control freaks used to faking being smart, they support each other in this endeavor and it works because nobody stands up to them...enter Jordan Peterson...just the man for the job of exposing these types. Jordan Is a true blessing to this world.
@lolmanittakesguts2 жыл бұрын
You are really being delusional, and falling into the exact same mindset as the people you seem to reject. Stop assigning such strong ideals to individuals, it is careless and harmful. Jordan Peterson isn't God's grace of intelligence to the world.
@rockycomet45872 жыл бұрын
@@lolmanittakesguts LOL, if Jordan Peterson isn't intelligent, then what does that make you?
@accuset2 жыл бұрын
"We'll have to wrap it up there" Yeah, because she's toast.
@Richard_Diala2 жыл бұрын
Best comment bro :D
@thinginground51792 жыл бұрын
Burnt toast with a fireball in the middle
@matt4504504502 жыл бұрын
@@thinginground5179 super duper atomic toast.
@monocharismatic2 жыл бұрын
the wrap up is probably due to the strict time allotments government/congressional hearings have. notice how she constantly asks the chairman for permission to speak a little longer. BTW, I find these _strict_ time allotments ironic in light of the existence of a filibuster which as I understand it is a way for a speaker on a house or senate floor to take hours to ramble on in order to delay/derail a vote on a bill. BTW, time allotments in hearing committees can be used to the advantage of those who are questioned. for example, I noticed how the Twitter CEO kept spending/wasting time by saying things like "I would like to thank the members of the committee for asking this question... I am honoured to provide some insight into the issues at hand..." and other filler speech. often the congressman/woman asking the question interrupts the responder with "yes or no, please answer the question, I have limited time".
@dogone72622 жыл бұрын
Dead in the water
@aliciaritchie86765 ай бұрын
God protect and keep him and his family safe! We all need this man in this craziness we call society
@TheMarsCydonia5 ай бұрын
Without Peterson, we would have no one to re-tweet fetish porn and get mad at paper towel dispensers.
@Gre3k10 ай бұрын
Damn man, if only i had that level of Articulation, i would be able to lead a cult against the humanity 🤣
@ephemeralenhancement94453 жыл бұрын
People focus so much on the transgender part when it's all about free speech
@AB-rv2lj3 жыл бұрын
Secret shopping is better
@kevinboyle9213 жыл бұрын
when you force someone to call you by a certain name - that is not free speech.
@ephemeralenhancement94453 жыл бұрын
@@kevinboyle921 yeah that's my point
@yeshalloween3 жыл бұрын
Exactly!
@lingonberriesofwrath18363 жыл бұрын
@@kevinboyle921 I know what you mean, but to be fair, that's kind of a weak argument formulated like that. If your boss insisted on calling you something you don't like in front of everybody all the time, like e g "Nazi Cocksucker", you'd probably want to be able to force him to stop doing that. And that's also where the government should step in, if at all; _to stop people, especially those in power, from using offensive names against individuals._ To be able to stop someone from giving you a name you don't want is also a matter of freedom, otherwise you're just a slave. Peterson isn't against pronouns per se, and has said that he would call someone whatever pronoun they want, if they ask him personally. What he's against is on one hand, that the government shouldn't dictate what anyone should be called, it's up to each individual. Also, on the other hand, as presented in this video, the bill is in many ways self contradictory and a general mess.
@MorganFreemanIsLife6 жыл бұрын
Jordan: "Your legislation is too general and disjointed" Senator: "W-w-what about t-t-the people writing us letters about their feelings?"
@janosch72106 жыл бұрын
The point is, they argue with 'feelings' while in reality companys do a shittone of money with court cases (more law mean - generally speaking - more court cases, more tax contributions, more lawyers needed, ppl believing their arm doesnt belong to their body, etc. In other words, its more about the money than everything different. Politicians think in the matter of how to get more money out of this as the only possible way of thinking. Therefor they are not interessed in JP views. Interesstingly i agree with JP views, although i see myself more of a leftist-marxist than the ppl JP seems to criticise in many of his speeches.
@davidcarrasco66826 жыл бұрын
I want to like this but 69 😅
@benreilly57205 жыл бұрын
Senator: "W-w-what about t-t-the people writing us letters about their feelings?" Answer = irrelevant on what their feelings are but they have to bring facts which science/biology is and what damages it will do to our society. Quit trying to please everyone, stand up and state this is what it is in terms of definition/biological, etc. This is been going on for years and will continue to be this way it is.
@laurants5 жыл бұрын
Brandon E then cue in the Offspring song: Feelings. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jp_LoHycbcl3jKc
@PC.NickRowan5 жыл бұрын
"Fuck your feelings" -Gad Saad
@andrewstewartherbst36466 ай бұрын
Peterson is right - we cannot force people to use specific words. The remedy, for those who feel offended, is to ignore people who you think are rude or offensive. Slander, of course, is a different matter.
@fishywaters6322 Жыл бұрын
LMFAOOO the man at the end wants to wrap it up hes got a bingo meeting
@bradhuygens6 жыл бұрын
"w-well I think our chair w-would rule me out of order If I proce-" "No you're fine" SHUT DOWN
@hdaNhun6 жыл бұрын
Top 10 anime betrayals
@smokeybarr6 жыл бұрын
bradhuygens Haha! He may as well have handed her a 6ft length of rope and saved us all the time.
@nuncaleite6 жыл бұрын
HAHAHAHAH that was the best part. no lady, you dug your own grave, now deal with it yourself, don't bring us into this!
@Skrillfx6 жыл бұрын
Exactly, she tried a little last ditch effort and worming out of answering that question and was shut down instantly.