Sequential Take 5 Synthesizer Review

[@r3dsh1ft3d]

Keep making videos like this, please! I second other's opinion this is the best take 5 review on KZbin, and one of the best synth reviews full stop. Perfect pacing, sound, technical details, etc.

[@Bloom_Music]

I’ve got a Nymphes in hand and a JX-08 on the way! I’ll keep putting these out when I can. Insane hours at my day job are owning me right now, but as soon as that lets up, I’ll be releasing more content. 👍🏼

[@r3dsh1ft3d]

@@Bloom_Music awesome keep it up!

[@elliotporter7494]

Mate, this review is exactly what I’ve been looking for. Fantastic. Production quality is fabulous, just the explanation and audio/visuals is exactly what so many reviews on YT are missing for this kind of thing. Keep it up! Subscribed immediately.

[@InnerPeaceSounds]

The best review and demonstration of Take 5 on KZbin by now.

[@TomAndreen]

I just can't believe I haven't seen this channel before. What a great review! I love your tone of voice. The sounds are great and relevant to the review (instead of just random cool sounds). Honestly, this is probably the best review I've seen on a synth in a long time. Great work! You may have sold the instrument to me as well.🌲❤

[@Bloom_Music]

Thanks so much, glad to hear you like it!

[@thaJeztah]

Second this! Didn't know of your channel, and best review of the take 5 I've seen so far. Thank you!

[@slowbike1]

I know! Its so refreshing to watch a good synth review without the narrator flipping out like he's on amphetamines! Great channel.

[@doubtingtom37]

This review clearly stands out so impressively judged against so many others ! Sequential Take 5 recommended strongly by trusted others. This review ensures the purchase. Congrats on fine job !. 🙏🏻

[@osirismaximus2787]

This is the best synth review I've seen in a long time. Very well done. Perfect pacing, great camera angles, great narration.. Thanks for doing this!

[@Bloom_Music]

Thanks!

[@RobinParmar]

I concur. Excellent in every way. Especially the focus on differences/similarities to similar synths.

[@embodie_breaks7089]

This was probably my favorite review of this synth. Thank you for taking the time to do adjust parameters, do filter sweeps and such. I appreciate it.

[@jasonderoche3363]

I second the comments that praise the review style. This review was a work of art in itself!

[@dustynewman]

If I hadn’t already just bought one before seeing this your vid would’ve sold me on it. I definitely learned a few things. Appreciate the thoughtful review style as well!

[@kaeidh]

You worked hard on this review and it’s visible. Great job! Really keep doing content, you’re good at it! 👏

[@sophiestellakis]

Excellent review!

[@MikePensini]

Great overview of the Take 5 man, well done!

[@TanvirKawnine]

Excellent review ❤! It's really a great synth. Enjoying my T5, which also happened to be my very first Sequential synth.

[@Tanzi24]

Thank you for such a wonderful video! I really like how you demonstrate the synth but also share your opinions and experience. I really like gear demos I can listen to and the way you explained everything in your voiceover meant I could do that. Looking forward to more!

[@redaxnela]

Donald, your content really stands out. Please keep it up and keep those videos coming. So refreshing.

[@mikaelsundblad5381]

Great review, I'm trying to decide on my first analog poly. This is a great help.

[@Bloom_Music]

Glad I could help! Hit me up if you have any questions that I didn’t cover in the review.

[@bangmateo7481]

@@Bloom_Music 1. After you make a create a link between a source and destination in the mod madrix how do you delete it? 2. Patch storage, does this synth comes with software to manage the patches? If so will the software allow us to store more patches than the 256 allowed by the synhth? 256 is a bit light imo.

[@donaldjordan1747]

@@bangmateo7481 1. I don't think there is a one touch "delete" function, but you can select the mod slot in the mod matrix, change the source to "No Source" and the destination to "No Dest", and this effectively deletes it. 2. No, it did not come with any software to manage patches that I'm aware of. There are functions in the main menu to dump and receive individual patches or banks, so you could manually manage them if you wanted more than 256. There will also likely be 3rd party preset mangers available (I know there have been for other DSI/Sequential synths).

[@bangmateo7481]

@@donaldjordan1747 Bummer on the lack of preset library software.

[@bangmateo7481]

@ghost mall Correct it is available now.

[@ToddMushaw]

So clear. So concise. Excellent tutorial. Thank you.

[@bustincircuits7701]

Very well done!!! The T5 is an amazing synth, a nod to the past packed full of potential for the Future!!!

[@polyphonico]

Wow! What a great review! I’ve played the Take 5 and just wanted to say I feel your really captured it’s sound and what it’s like to use. You also included a few details I hadn’t heard anywhere else (such as the distinction between triangle and saw core oscillators). I also wanted to add that I really enjoyed the Chorus and Tape Effects. The chorus is super lush and really adds a lot to a patch in my opinion. The tape effects are really well done. You can get some old school flange sound by modulating their timing, which I thought was really fun!

[@Bloom_Music]

Yeah, the review was already getting pretty long winded, so I cut some of the stuff where I went into the effects section in more detail. For sure, there is some good stuff. My favorite patch I've made so far used the chorus!

[@eligioelini9194]

This video was very useful, but for a particular reason. I have found that I have a tendency to jump from knob to knob too casually. Sometimes it can be good because instinct and creativity are privileged, but in many other cases it is good to know how to linger calmly on the details.This video has shown how often I do not focus on the slightest variations it can give a small shift, but which is important in the final result. I will see in the future to improve in this respect. I am an amateur and I am learning many new things (I have recently retired, industrial automation sector) and I can finally dedicate myself to music as I would like. I already have the PRO 3 which is nothing short of fantastic. I think I will also add the TAKE 5 because I have not found anything that satisfies me in the polyphonic synts that I have tried to pair with it. (At least for my musical tastes as, and I say this with all the respect of those who think differently, I do not follow the musical production since 1975 onwards ...) Thanks, a greeting from Italy.

[@veerchasm1]

What a complete overview

[@mikeyocum5278]

Great, thoughtful, even-handed review. Thank you!

[@christdolphin69]

i was trying to demo the drives to ahow each one's character and using white noise is very helpful. good thinking

[@blpfrk]

Great review! I can see this channel growing fast. Great job!

[@H4NDCRAFTED]

Nicely presented , love my Pro 3 and my take 5 is on the way.

[@tuc5987]

This was a great review, loved it! I would have liked to see/hear the filter resonance and how it perhaps changes (or not) with low volume input from the oscillators, as this can emphasize resonance further. Also, when you talk about the vintage knob, you mention the calibration differences between voices correctly. From what I've been told by an engineer, that's the actual reason, not necessarily any instabilities from electronic parts (unless we talk about really old gear with leaking capacitors and other parts being broken). A fresh-from-the-factory synth in e.g. 1979 didn't necessarily come with unstable components, but the calibration between voices and the part tolerances (i.e. same chips not behaving identical) were the deciding factors for the "vintage" sound.

[@MakingMadBeats]

Beautiful review of an even more beautiful synth! I guess, I' m gonna get one 😊

[@chrisboyce3109]

Wow - great review. That first patch in your Effects section - it sounds like nylon guitar or something... it's just wild. Would love to know how that was done. My Take 5 should be arriving this week. Thanks again.

[@Bloom_Music]

It's been so long ago, I can't remember the details of that patch! I can definitely hear some highpass filtering, some velocity to cutoff, and some mild audio rate modulation on the filter (possibly also tied to velocity)? Of all of the reviews I've done, I was the most happy with the patches that I came up with on the Take 5. The sound and modulation palette is so varied, I often ended up places I never expected. It literally made me a better programmer. You will love it!

[@chrisboyce3109]

@@Bloom_Music Thanks for the reply. I'm a beginner with subtractive synths, but will read the manual diligently, as I'm eager to get the most out of it. Thanks again.

[@Bloom_Music]

@@chrisboyce3109 Good luck on your journey! If you haven't already, you might want to check out the Patch Diary videos on my channel. I start with initialized patches and show the complete process of developing a patch, from scratch. Could be very helpful and interesting for a beginner!

[@chrisboyce3109]

@@Bloom_Music You're the best sir. Much appreciated.

[@ConenRuam]

Excellent review!!! Super detailed and just brilliant all round, thanks!

[@thereignofdando]

Great review! I had just ordered a Pro 3, and then starting hearing about this. Have changed my order to a Take 5. I understand they are very different synths, but this will do more of what I want, I think. Again, excellent review!

[@LaminarSound]

Dude overdrive and sine wave built in, Tycho city!!! This is the synth for me!

[@vatolegato]

This is the best review I've seen of the Take 5! And it's the music you made that really makes it awesome. I like the vintage style sounds you made. One thing I'm wondering though is, do you think the Take 5 has a very bright sound? I noticed when you had the filter pretty low at 17:234, the sound was still too bright for my taste. However, you did have the distortion all the way up on that sound so I wonder if that had an effect on the sound.

[@Bloom_Music]

Thanks! The Take 5 can definitely go dark if that's your taste. On that particular patch, even though the physical position of the knob was very low, there was a lot of modulation going on to open the filter back up. If you haven't seen it, I'd recommend checking out the "Sounds Only" version of this video, linked in the description. It has a ~8 minute section at the beginning of a bunch of different patches I made. You can hear some more dark sounding patches there.

[@N4SixString]

I've seen a lot of reviewers talk about the scooped mids of the take 5 in comparison to the prophet 6 or prophet 10. Some say it feels like it's missing something in comparison but it's just how the take 5 is. So really if anything it's a dark scooped synth

[@jeffgriffithsmusic]

Great review and presentation. Thank you. Subscribed.

[@horder2344]

Great review thanks. Having just bought the T5 this really helps me get up and running. 👍

[@silvermyth2119]

I'm really liking this synth!👍🎹 Great demo, thanks!

[@dalecutlemusic586]

Wow. Awesome review. New subscriber! I really like your style of video.

[@HustonSingletary]

Nice walkthrough and review with some spot on explanations. Enjoyed it.

[@Sharon-music]

Amazing video. Love the way you show the synth. Really helps

[@dowdbailey4113]

Very good review. I learned some fresh things.

[@jumpstar9000]

What a really awesome review! Nice one 👍

[@conradclipper]

Dude this is an incredible review, thanks so much.

[@gffg387]

Do more synths. This video was great!

[@Bloom_Music]

Ha, I will do as many as I can afford!

[@wolfpackpresets]

Great review, thanks!

[@TeamHash]

Great review.

[@ebasswah]

Congrats! 1000th subscriber, well deserved! :)

[@Bloom_Music]

🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳

[@wurlinnawurl]

They seem to have tweeked the reverb on p6 in the new updates.. it sounds good now. It has been blowing me away actually lately.

[@Bloom_Music]

Interesting, I'll have to revisit!

[@lit3work]

Great video. Now subbed. And GAS-sing hard for this synth.

[@markothe]

Great overview.

[@wilsonjaksetic6009]

The Deepmind 12 had polyphonic LFOs too! I’m starting to really understand how the Deepmind got it’s name…

[@divineconcrete]

About the polyphonic / per voice LFO, Take5 isn't the only analog poly to do it: the Dreadbox Nymphes have one too :)

[@Bloom_Music]

To be fair, this video was made before the Nymphes came out, but yes, you are correct. However, the Take 5 has much more routing options with the polyphonic LFO. Both are cool, though. I'm glad it's becoming a popular option to include! BTW, I have a good review of the Nymphes as well, if you haven't already checked it out. 😉

[@pirated8557]

Excellent overview 👍🏼 Cheers

[@hermano8160]

Great review! I think you sold me!

[@superprim12]

awesome channel...where have you been?

[@Pintosonic]

The Take 5 is not the only one that has polyphonic LFOs. The Polybrute’s LFOs can be switched from mono, poly or retrig-mono.

[@Bloom_Music]

Good catch, I missed that! I've yet to get to play one of those...

[@haroldlehman4284]

There a few other synths with this feature. The Moog One has it and Rev 2 only has polyphonic LFO's (it's a pain to get them in sync) and though it's has digital oscillators I'd also count the Peak in the same general class of synth. Regardless of that nit picking, this is a very nice review!

[@Bloom_Music]

@@haroldlehman4284 Oof... Moog One wasn't on my radar, but can't believe I missed the Rev 2! Thanks for the clarification!

[@Shred_The_Weapon]

It is 27 June,2023 as I comment. Earlier today, I assessed this model as being like the love child of a Prophet 600 and an Oberheim Matrix 6. The “conversation piece” is how durable it is and how well it holds up without the “furniture characteristics” of the Prophet models. Watching this review, I suddenly find myself daydreaming about swapping my (both preowned) ARP Odyssey and Matrix 1000 module (the only Oberheim I’ve yet owned) toward getting a Take Five. How come?

[@DKH712]

Great video! The polybrute actually has 2 polyphonic LFOs. The super 6 has it too, but it's not exactly analog

[@andrewmarsden6670]

Great review, you've sold it to me! Regarding the sequencer, is there any way to transpose the sequence or is the way demonstrated in you review the only option?

[@Bloom_Music]

Good question, I should have covered that in the review! Switching to unison mode allows you to transpose the sequence as you'd typically expect. So you could dynamically switch in and out of unison to transpose and kind of build a performance. Only caveat is if you're doing something like this live, you'll need to make sure you've got unison mode set to only a single voice before you start, otherwise, you'll temporarily get stacked voices when you switch into unison mode, which could be jarring.

[@millenniummastering]

Polybrute has 3 per voice LFOs. Moog one has 4 per voice LFO's. Prophet 10 osc 2 becomes a per voice LFO. Rev 2's LFO"s are per voice. etc etc.

[@hellodavidryan]

Wonderful 🙌

[@ZozillaThaGreat]

Exellent review , i wonder if grabbing a Prophet REv 2 8/ 16 voices is the equivalent in desktop format (with its two layers ability ) specially if the fx and modulation is similar ....

[@Bloom_Music]

Unfortunately, I haven't had a chance to play with the Rev2, so I don't have any personal experience. I'd expect they sound similar, but there's a few tricks up the Take 5's sleeve that I think will yield a slightly different character. Things like the drive, vintage, resonance compensation, and effects stand out vs. the Rev2. (While I don't have personal experience with the Rev2 effects, I liked the new effects in the Take 5 much better than the effects in my Prophet 6, so I'm assuming the same for the Rev 2). So, I think the Take 5 could probably do a good Rev 2 impression, but the Rev 2 would struggle keeping up with the Take 5 when you start to introduce some of its unique attributes. But this is all speculation, as I haven't actually used the Rev 2. :)

[@ZozillaThaGreat]

@@Bloom_Music Thks for the feedback that i somehow missed !!

[@TROGULAR10000]

Pretty eloquent for a synth review, this guy should be making documentaries or something.

[@vermelho14bis]

I’d like you to explain more about Arpeggio & Sequencer. It’s possible play things like old VC3s (The Who, Pink Floyd) in a modern way? Yes, Inam from the old school but those wonderful machines are a bit like vintage but I bet they point to the future.

[@nebula0697]

The oscillator section is much nicer than on the Prophets. End of story. This synth probably exists because Focusrite suggested a departure from the Prophet tradition and a lower-price offering, and it will obviously have mass appeal.

[@hc_clifford]

Excellent review, thorough and very cleanly made and clearly presented. The synth sounds stunning and I am a big fan of the mod matrix, dedicated reverb and vintage knob incorporation. However... holy cow that panel flex at 23:40! Were you pressing especially hard, or did you notice it with regular usage (pressing buttons around the centre, for instance)?

[@jasonmoyer]

I demo'd one (and ultimately bought it) that was sitting next to a Rev2 at the shop, and both synths had the exact same amount of panel movement. I just checked and if I push firmly on the center bottom of the panel it flexes some, if I use the patch selection buttons in that area with the normal amount of pressure required to use those buttons it doesn't move at all.

[@jasonmoyer]

I just checked, and there are posts on the Sequential forum mentioning the flex on the Rev2 (which I observed) and also the OB-6. I'm guessing the P6 is similar. I don't mean to imply that it makes it acceptable, but apparently it's not something unique to this synth as far as DSI goes.

[@Bloom_Music]

I was definitely pressing harder than you would ever naturally press in normal use. The only time I ever notice the flex in day-to-day use is when switching between the first four or so banks, where you're pressing right at the bottom, middle of the panel. The combined actuation force of the bank button along with the number button results in about 1/16" of deflection.

[@hc_clifford]

@@Bloom_Music thank you so much for the detailed reply (and again for the excellent review)! I'm glad to hear it doesn't come up all too often in actual usage. And thanks to you jasonmoyer, too! I've had an OB-6 in the past and felt it was built quite well, so if this is comparable then that's great news

[@brianlespoir6287]

Call me crazy, because I send this synth back for it's knobs. It sounds amazing, but those knobs, Can't ,make a choice between the Prophet 6 or 5, I like them both.

[@dimensionstomorrow]

You still liking this one? I’m really torn between going for this as my only polysynth, or saving up for a P6 module. I really like the size of the Take 5. Literally the perfect size for my space.

[@Bloom_Music]

Based purely on sound design capability, I prefer the Take 5. It has greater modulation potential, a more advanced architecture, and I like the effects better. However, I MUCH prefer the module format. I got tired of lugging the Take 5 around. It's not as light and mobile as Sequential's marketing would lead you to believe! So it will depend on what your priority is. If portability is a major factor, I'd lean towards the P6. But based purely on sound, I personally prefer the Take 5.

[@dimensionstomorrow]

@@Bloom_Music Thanks very much for the thoughtful answer. It’s funny because you are the second person I’ve talked to that said that about the size/weight. I need to compare the specs to my Moog Grandmother again. That also feels like I’m moving a giant typewriter around. It’s really a good point to consider. Thanks! (Just checked and almost exactly the same!)

[@shahruzmoshtael]

The prophet-6 has resonance low end compensation FYI

[@gaoeykreg]

Obviously not a dealbreaker for most but what a crap name for a synthesiser! I’d definitely cover that up on the back if I was using this on stage. Just my opinion of course. Anyway, great review!

[@thisistherealkit]

Compared to Rev2 in aspect of modulation. What do you lose with 2 extra LFOs, can any explain hypothetical situation/sound designing? Thanks!

[@Bloom_Music]

The more LFOs you have, the more opportunity you will have for independent modulations. This can provide more options for movement, but can also get messy very quickly if you are not using subtle modulation depths. But generally, if modulation potential is a priority for you, more modulation sources is better. Two LFOs is generally the minimum I want to work with; a single LFO feels limiting. For example, I often like to be able to modulate the filter and pitch independently. I don't work with synths with 3+ LFOs very often, but it opens up some creative options like modulating the pitches of multiple oscillators independently, or having spare LFOs to modulate the rates of other LFOs. It just opens up more creative potential. Overall, if your goal is bread and butter, classic synth sounds, you won't need four LFOs. But if your priority is crazy modulation potential, more LFOs will be better.

[@thisistherealkit]

@@Bloom_Music i do agree. I have a Prologue while i love it’s sound, a Single LFO and one destination is quite limited and annoying so im wondering if i should go with Rev2 or Take5 but doesnt more mod-matrix in Take5 make up for the missing two LFOs from your experience? Take 5 newer Filter and Osc alone beat Rev2 for sure but….

[@godson197410]

Just got 1 💪🏿💪🏿💪🏿💪🏿💪🏿💪🏿

[@noordholland648]

Pro 2 has sinewave , but its just a filtered triangle right..?

[@Bloom_Music]

Technically, yes, you can use a filter to shave a triangle to a sine. However, this limits your filter to that duty alone and severely restricts your sound design potential. As an example, lets say I want to make a sound where Osc 1 is a saw wave, and then Osc 2 is a sine wave an octave down to fill out the bottom end. If Osc 2 is a triangle, and I'm trying to use the filter to shave it into a sine, I'm also filtering Osc 1, and potentially removing way more of that signal than desired. By contrast, if Osc 2 is actually a sine wave, my filter is free to shape Osc 1 however I want, while still getting a rock solid bottom end from the Osc 2 sine wave. This is a simplified example, but as a general rule, you don't want your filter restricted just to cleanup. You want it free for more creative duties! One point of clarity- The Pro 2 is not an analogue synth. It uses digital oscillators!

[@TwinCitiesOxygen]

What do you think of the opsix

[@Bloom_Music]

I haven't really spent any time with it. FM synthesis isn't really my thing, but I am intrigued by the form factor and controls, so I may try it eventually. The Modwave on the other hand... 👍🏼🔥

[@EvanPriceMusicChannel]

FYI...the PRO 12 most certainly has a sine wav

[@spaceman103]

Time for a Take 10 ( or at least an 8 voice).

[@rishpanjeet7479]

A lot of cats are moving their Rev 2s for this little guy, so there must be something to it…

[@Bloom_Music]

Oh, I would 100% take this over a P08, for sure. It has so much more personality.

[@LaminarSound]

Does Take 5 have ability to see where knobs *should be when a preset is recalled? Since the knobs are not automated it would be nice to know where the knobs were when a preset was saved.

[@Bloom_Music]

There is an "original value" dot in the corner of the patch number display. Whenever the knob you are currently moving is at the value that was saved in the preset, the dot will be present. It is verrrry precise. Like, you have to be dead on for it to show up.

[@LaminarSound]

@@Bloom_Music thank you!! That was exactly what i was hoping for.

[@LaminarSound]

Filter “chip”? I assume its just a circuit right? Not a DSP chip?

[@Bloom_Music]

It's an IC chip (specifically the SSI2140), not a DSP chip. It's analog!

[@LaminarSound]

@@Bloom_Music yep! I did some research yesterday and found some great info on those ICs.

[@gz625]

How much this synth is better than DeepMind6?

[@donaldjordan1747]

I wouldn't say either is better than the other. They are very different synthesizers and it depends on what your priorities are. For me, I prefer the raw sounds of the Take 5's oscillators and filter, and it has way more raw sound possibilities just due to the more complex oscillators. I also like the vintage mode and how immediate the controls are (the DM6 is very menu dive-y). So my preference is the Take 5. However, the DM6 is obviously significantly cheaper, so if cost is a consideration, that's a major plus. It also has really good (and more) envelopes, if that's something you care about. Ultimately, you'll have to decide what your priorities are and make a decision based off of that. The two synths are more different than alike, so it's hard to make a direct comparison!

[@christinepaluch7967]

The bottom end loss is not typical of sequential filters, it is more of a moog ladder filter thing.

[@Bloom_Music]

While the bottom end loss of the ladder filter is more dramatic, the filters Sequential use still have it. Prophet 5 Rev 4 OS 2.0.4 specifically addresses this with Q compensation.

[@briann5001]

The real silent beast is the prophet X

[@insidethefoilbag]

Sounds like Patrick Bateman reviewing

[@PaulGBass]

"The Take 5 is a five voice polyphonic analogue synthesizer". Wrong! The Take 5 is a 5 voice synthesizer with Analogue VCOs and VCFs, but which is digital (DSP) apart from those two elements of the signal chain. Digital amps, effects, modulations sources, lfos, envelopes, etc., etc.

[@horder2344]

Depends how you look at it. It's certainly not full analogue but even my juno 60 has DCOs & very few are now fully analogue.Re the effects id be surprised if they wernt digital. The digital element was though almost a deal breaker for me but having taken the plunge its definitely got more analogue than a roland Gaia for sure and it does sound nice.

[@Bloom_Music]

Uh, oh. Gearslutz is leaking. ;) For those of you who aren’t as obsessive about this stuff as PaulGBass and myself, let me explain- The Take 5 has analog oscillators and filters, but has digital amps, effects, and modulation. There is no strict definition of exactly what an “analog” synth is, so this has caused some debate in other, more nerdy places of the internet. I am part of the camp that believes that the oscillators and filters are what inject the “mojo” that everyone is talking about when they praise analog synths. Typically, the chain of components that follow don’t have much of an impact on the sound, so whether they are digital or not isn’t part of the consideration of whether the instrument is considered “analog” or not. This can get very muddy, because most of the people taking shots at the Take 5 would defend the Prophet 5 to their dying breath, despite it having digital envelopes. There is no “official” rule on which components are ok to be digital in an “analog” synth, vs. which aren’t. The specific component that has every one riled up on the Take 5 is the digital VCAs. One could argue that there are certain synths where the VCAs have an audible impact on the synth’s “sound”. In my opinion, the modern Sequential instruments have transparent VCAs and do not fall into that group. So the replacement of the VCAs with digital components has little practical impact to the synth’s sound. If you are still reading this and haven’t fallen asleep with boredom yet, the point is, don’t get caught up in the debate of whether the Take 5 is true “analog” or not. It’s an exercise in pedantry. Just listen to the thing and decide if you like it!

[@ConenRuam]

Very well said, totally agree, if I like the sound of it, and I really like the sound of the Take 5, it makes no difference to me, ESPECIALLY in a synth like this where people are genuinely surprised at the pricepoint compared to other Sequential synths

[@wurlinnawurl]

@@ConenRuam digital envelopes don't effect the sound, they just send cv to control it.. a vca does.. I'm not saying that it is bad or T5 sounds bad.. but it is different.. don't pretend like digital envelopes are anything the same..

[@ConenRuam]

@@wurlinnawurl sure, but if you're suggesting every analogue VCA imparts a strong character into a synth that's not true either, it all depends on how it's implimented

[@liantrosretrospectiva4134]

3:07 yuckkk... I´d call it the "sinusitis synth"

[@INeedsMoneys]

Great video but you have a way to low frame rate set up. It’s flickering a fuck ton in certain sequences 🥲

[@Bloom_Music]

Have to agree to disagree on that one. 24FPS or bust. 😉

[@robertoariata4041]

Excellent review. Thanks.

[@keymagicinc520]

Excellent review! Thank you!

[@RealPeteRyan]

Great review. Thanks 🙏🏻