Sewer Line Replacement For Beginners

[@andreahahn6421]

Lol I love that I'm sitting here learning about my septic tank and get a minute to her the gospel. Amen. Best video ever.

[@lilyseestheworld7865]

Love the instruction and the idea to explain the Gospel right there. Bless you, brother, and thank you a lot!

[@jlorraine21]

Thank you for the tips and the info. I also like how you are bold In your faith. Great job. Thank you.

[@Samhain2323]

Excellent video !!! I learned so much from just this video !!! Blessed Be

[@robertfrapples2472]

I'm in the middle of a 60' sewer pipe replacement. They had installed thin, sub-grade PVC pipe for an added rear bathroom, and the weight of the dirt had crushed it, splitting it along the bottom for several feet. I rented a trencher and chewed out the old pipe, but then had to rent a mini excavator (AWESOME) to finish the job. In retrospect, I should have done the whole job with the excavator. We had gotten estimates to replace the pipe when we thought only about 20' of it was bad, and $8K - $10K was the average. I'll have about $600 in rental fees and maybe $200 in pipe, fittings and cement. Plumbers sure have gotten "proud" of their work in the past few years. It costs $140 to have someone snake a sink out nowadays. It's just waste running downhill, guys.

[@vinnygoombatts1458]

Good job, too bad they use the wrong fittings, and as you can see absolutely no gravel used backfill which is required.

[@dafishcooka]

I just found a leak in my front yard. About to undertake this exact job. Wish me luck! I'll be damned if I call a plumber!

[@jaredstearns6013]

I got a quote for $1000 to replace my kitchen sink. I got it done myself for $400 in two hours. I think most people are just scared of plumbing because of the running water making them nervous. Anyway I have to start digging out my sewer main today by hand no way to get machines in.

[@Jimmy2shits]

$200 in pipe??? I just paid $700 for damn near nothing 🥲

[@jaredstearns6013]

@@Jimmy2shits joe bidens america

[@kongurlov6714]

Thank you for that personal message

[@eprokhor]

Good job on your video ad to save people’s souls :)

[@jeffdennis5965]

Best advertisement ad I've ever seen or listened to thank you

[@creativerepairing2960]

Glad you like it!

[@ignoranceisnotatrend4669]

​@@creativerepairing2960 I want to fix my myself, a plumber already ran a camera and said it's a break in the line on my side in the back yard but I just don't know how deep to dig before I can see the pipe 😢, the break is about 16 feet and should I repair the break only or entire line

[@wallyo7777]

Your amazing brother! May The Lord bless you for your spreading of the good news, and also your video helped me alot thank you!!

[@CooterOnDaMind]

Too bad television news isn't as helpful!

[@CooterOnDaMind]

Jesus did drink alcohol tho

[@braveheartrv2946]

Internal repair?!?! I have to subscribe now!!!

[@islandbreeze496]

Love the 60 second commercial!

[@roberttoomey1755]

Thanks!!!!

[@terryweekly4510]

Never connect your pipe into your fitting in a straight line. Insert your pipe about a 1/4 turn from finished alignment. When you fully insert the pipe to the depth of the socket , then twist it the 1/4 turn to align your marks. This will insure that there is no voids of glue or air in your connection.

[@ShyMplsMale]

It must be nice having the main drain only a few feet below ground level lol. Here in Minnesota, sewer drains are 8-10'+ below ground level.

[@CrimsonSkunk]

lol I'm in Minnesota and was thinking the same thing

[@IzaiazBarrera]

Awesome video💯👍🏽

[@ArtistCreek]

9:46 the number marking is brillant. I am running new lines due to corroded 50 yr old pipes and think that will save me headaches.

[@justincase8239]

Waste pipe should slope a quarter inch per foot so the water and solids travel at the same speed.

[@blackhorse6362]

Amen brother.

[@juniormedina9282]

Much needed thank you.

[@matthewd.3276]

Jesus is the Way, the Truth and the Life!

[@brodietate-betterrealestat2441]

Yes sir

[@lilyseestheworld7865]

Amen!

[@carollockmer8981]

Thanks for the message

[@stubbornmike4842]

Why did you use rubber connectors rather than gluing pipes together?

[@vinnygoombatts1458]

You can't use a sanitary tee on it's side. Must be a combination tee or a Y and a 45.

[@ArtistCreek]

I think it depends on your Code. Everywhere is different. For me my whole system is out of code so I don't care as long as it works correctly . No one else can work on our septic being out of code so I'm learning as I go.

[@jamescc2010]

This can save a home owner several thousand $$ if you it yourself, with maybe have digging done by day labor. Make sure you research for any gas , water lines so you don't damage them and cause more issues and $$ expense..

[@jamesharper8373]

Man what an excellent video! Thank you. A couple of questions. Dies this require pulling a permit? Also, how did you dispose of the old pipe? Thanks

[@creativerepairing2960]

Hi James, Thanks for the comment. As for the old pipe, depending on what it is made of you can cut it up and put it in your garbage can. Clay and cast iron pipe is heavy so there are usually maximum weight requirements by your garbage company. As for the permit every jurisdiction is different and you would want to check with your local building department. A lot of counties have a $1000 or less cut off for permit requirements and I have not seen any statutes which determine how the $1000 is calculated. For example if you spend $200 for pipe and fittings and pay yourself $5 per hours how does that add up to $1000.

[@jamesharper8373]

@@creativerepairing2960 Good info. Thanks for the quick response

[@joshuaa1611]

Amen!

[@nellth7136]

Amen

[@celyl]

They just sent me quote to replace sewer pipe $4800 plus tax. That does not include excavation.

[@Hdaug]

Real.

[@terrancemaddox9062]

Hows that workin now?

[@creativerepairing2960]

Hi Terrance, It has been over a year and no sewer backups!

[@-ultravic661]

THAT doesn't look like an eternal installation to me. It may need a miraculous intervention, or other.

[@caleberwin65]

That took a really strange turn.

[@CuauhtemocVasquez-ld8cn]

🙂👍🙏

[@stevesmith6272]

Ani Maskim

[@brian2100]

Soft poop stoppage

[@geraldritchey4822]

A word about the commercial. No one in the New Testament church was ever saved By just confessing and accepting Jesus. You must obey Acts 2:38 to be saved. I did like the sewer pipe video, tho.

[@creativerepairing2960]

Hi Gerald, Thank you for your comment. Interesting topic of baptism which I have studied and pondered for years. Consider the following verse Acts 10:44 While Peter was still saying these things, the Holy Spirit fell on all who heard the word. 45 And the believers from among the circumcised who had come with Peter were amazed, because the gift of the Holy Spirit was poured out even on the Gentiles. 46 For they were hearing them speaking in tongues and extolling God. Then Peter declared, 47 “Can anyone withhold water for baptizing these people, who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?” 48 And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. The "Holy Spirit was poured out on even the Gentiles (vs 45)" and they "received the Holy Spirit just as Peter had (vs 47)" prior to being baptized with water. Can an unsaved person "receive the Holy Spirit just as Peter did" prior to being saved if in fact they were not saved because they had not yet been baptized with water? What do you think? I value your opinion on this topic. Thanks

[@geraldritchey4822]

@@creativerepairing2960 Thank you for the question. I absolutely love answering this question, because it is in the context of Acts 2, yet people are oblivious to it. First of all you have to understand that in Acts 2:38, Luke has already established what the plan of salvation is. It is repentance, water baptism in the name of Jesus for remission of sins, and receiving the Holy Ghost. Not one, not two, but all three things are necessary. If one is missing, the salvation process is not complete. Any subsequent mention of salvation, or believing, or conversion is automatically understood to include all three. Now to Acts 10. The Jews did not believe the Gentiles were eligible for Acts 2:38 salvation. But God , through a vision to Peter, was about to change this. He let Peter know that it was His will for Gentiles to be saved. But the six Jews with Peter had not seen the vision Peter saw. If Peter would have baptized the Gentiles first, the Jews would have certainly strongly objected, and considered Peter to be out of line. God allowed the Gentiles to receive the Spirit before being baptized in order to convince those Jews that it was God's doing, and not Peter's. They witnessed the supernatural sign of Holy Ghost infilling, speaking in tongues, and because of this they could not object. That's why Peter asked "Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?" They had no grounds to object, since they had witnessed the unmistakable universal sign of Spirit infilling, which is speaking in tongues. But the salvation process was not complete. Baptism is for the purpose of remission of sins. Peter commanded them to be baptized in order to fulfill this requirement.

[@creativerepairing2960]

Hi Gerald, Thanks for answering my questions. It really helped me to see your theological position. We don’t agree on all points but it is good to see where someone is coming from and to dig into our bibles. I am not against baptizm and I have been baptized in water just as the Lord has directed us. When I look at the three crosses at Calvary there are two thieves on either side of Jesus in Luke 23:39 "One of the criminals who were hanged railed at him,[d] saying, “Are you not the Christ? Save yourself and us!” 40 But the other rebuked him, saying, “Do you not fear God, since you are under the same sentence of condemnation? 41 And we indeed justly, for we are receiving the due reward of our deeds; but this man has done nothing wrong.” 42 And he said, “Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.” 43 And he said to him, “Truly, I say to you, today you will be with me in paradise.”. When I read this passage I see in the second criminal repentance and faith acknowledging who Jesus was and him calling out to him through faith, and Jesus pronounced him saved "today you will be with me in paradise", yet no where in the verse is there water baptism. Water Baptism represents the death and burial of our old man (going under the water) then the resurrection of our new man being born again with the Holy Spirit (coming back up out of the water), as a spiritual representation of what Christ did for us on the cross. When baptism is referenced in Mark 16:16 it doesn’t mean it exclusively it has to be a physical ritual of emersion in water but a recognition in the heart through faith, the death, burial and resurrection of Christ which leads to our being born again. When viewed like this all the scriptures about salvation line up and make perfect since. Some scriptures reference baptism as part of salvation and some don’t such as Romans 10:9. The question concerning whether the physical ritual of water baptism as a requirement for salvation, my answer is no. We are not saved by ritual or works but by "grace through faith." "For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith -- and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God -- not by works, so that no one can boast" (Ephesians 2:8-9). Therefore, the ceremonial ritual of water baptism does not save us. However, the baptism of the Spirit is necessary for salvation and that has nothing to do with rituals in water. I respect your opinion and would always encourage anyone to be baptized.

[@geraldritchey4822]

@@creativerepairing2960 I encounter these questions a lot. The first thing you have to understand about the thief on the cross is, he was not under the New Testament, or Covenant. Everything that happened in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John is under the Old Testament. Hebrews 9:16,17 explains that for a testament to take effect, there must be the death of the testator. Jesus was the testator of the New Testament. Therefore the New Testament did not take effect until Jesus died. The exact moment was when the veil in the temple was torn from top to bottom, signifying that men no longer need a priest to intercede, but every man can now approach God for himself because of what Jesus did on Calvary. The first people saved under the New Covenant or the church age was in Acts 2:1-4. Back to the thief. Matthew 9:6 says while Jesus was on earth He had power to forgive sins. That's how the thief was saved without having to follow the law, offer sacrifices, etc. Baptism for remission of sins was not in force until the Day of Pentecost in Acts 2. Ephesians 2:8,9: This is a direct reference to Acts 19:1-6, where the Ephesians were saved by repentance(which they had done at John's instruction), water baptism in the name of Jesus, and receiving the Holy Ghost. That's how the Ephesians were saved. That's what saved by grace means. Grace doesn't mean you don't have to do anything. It means we get the opportunity to receive and obey instructions on how to be saved. Noah found grace, but grace alone didn't save him. He had to follow instructions on how to build the ark to save himself and his family. Being born again(according to John 3:3-5) is obeying Acts 2:38. Born of water is water baptism. Born of the Spirit is receiving the Holy Ghost. John 3:5 says we must be born of water and of the Spirit to enter heaven. I disagree with your assertion that baptism is not salvific. Acts 2:38 says baptism remits sin. How can you be saved if your sins are not remitted? You can't. I Peter 3:21 specificly says baptism now saves us. Acts 22:16 says baptism washes away sin. Colossians 2:11 says baptism puts away sin.

[@creativerepairing2960]

Hi Gerald, Thank you for your reply. I have been enjoying our discussion as it takes both of us deeper into the Word. I feel the conversation needs to go to the interlinear for a study of how the word “baptize” is translated. First the word baptize or baptized is translated from the Greek word “Baptizo (G907)”. In Matthew 3:11 John says “I baptize (Baptizo G907) you with water for repentance, but he who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize (Baptizo G907) you with the Holy Spirit and fire.” In this passage we can see there are two baptisms, one the baptism of water for repentance and the second is the baptism of the Holy Spirit which is often physically manifested by the gift of speaking in tongues and other spiritual gifts, both baptisms of which are translated from the same Greek word (Baptizo G907). We can conclude from Matthew 3:11 that the use of the word Baptize (Baptizo G907) does not exclusively mean “baptism in water” and from my study the use of the word baptize (Baptizo G907) when it is referring to water baptism it connected with the second Greek word for water “Hydor G5204”, which is the same pattern we see in Mark 1:8, Luke 3:16 and John 1:33. Now with this conclusion in mind when we go back you your original scripture Acts 2:38 “Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized (Baptizo G907) , every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.”, we can’t conclude this is speaking of water baptism as “Hydor G5204” is not mentioned and additionally the scripture says “you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit” which is usually the physical manifestation of the “baptism of the Holy Spirit”. Likewise we see this same pattern in Mark 16:16 “Whoever believes and is baptized (Baptizo G907) will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned. 17 And these signs will accompany those who believe: in my name they will cast out demons; they will speak in new tongues; 18 they will pick up serpents with their hands; and if they drink any deadly poison, it will not hurt them; they will lay their hands on the sick, and they will recover.” While (Baptizo G907) is used here, “water (Hydor G5204)” is not included and immediately following in vs 17 we again see the physical manifestation of the “Baptism of the Holy Spirit”. We also see this same pattern in Acts 19:1-6. What do you think?

[@Tomtom3577]

Video was going well until we got to the bible bullshit.... then you lost me.

[@lilyseestheworld7865]

A sewer pipe is not as important as where you spend eternity. I am glad he is sharing the Good News.

[@robertfrapples2472]

We do not go to Hell for our "sins," but our "Sin." Hell is the penalty for being born as the result of a sexual act. That's why we are "born again." Sins are forgiven. Original Sin, on the other hand, is replaced.

[@jamesharper8373]

That's just not true friend. Sex in and of itself is not a sin. In fact, is meant to be enjoyed within the confines of marriage between husband and wife.

[@ramadael-amin8371]

But how do you honestly know if you haven't died b4. Is this opinions on what you as an individual believe

[@davidlee1075]

And Superman has x-ray vision

[@cgschow1971]

Still blown away in this day and age that people are still duped by this original sin thing. Sex is not bad, never has been. It's not sinful. This is simply a way to control people.

[@beardowierdo1104]

Wtf with the preaching