Should You Buy a 2023 Toyota Sequoia? In Depth Review By a Mechanic

[@Samir-qi1uy]

You are so much more than a " Mechanic ". Before all you are honest and good man. All the best!

[@tpuuup]

Yes, thank you sir..i love your honest reviews.

[@chetanjiva8874]

A complete and honest review from a Toyota master technician for a Toyota vehicle. You can't get better then this professionalism.

[@AdamWild572]

I love Car Care Nuts new car reviews. All other reviews focus on features and drivability. I really want to know the nuts and bolts of what we are buying, and whether or not these mega machines will last.

[@Baebon6259]

definitely not going to last against the NA V8 with its simple 6 spds. However, I do want to see multiple of these new Sequoias reaching 200k miles in 10 years before buying

[@jasonczfan8658]

Yep. When it comes to buying a car, reliability and dependability is what I care about the most

[@AdamWild572]

I've got a 2015 Toyota Sequoia Platinum. Runs like brand new. Think I'll just keep it.

[@douglaspeebles9928]

I agree, just love his new car reviews because he gives us an honest opinion of what he thinks from a mechanics point of view. God Bless Him!

[@barrywiseman7012]

@@AdamWild572 We've had both a 2002 Sequoia LTD & 2015 Sequoia LTD. Downsized to a 2022 4 Runner LTD. It suits us size wise @ this point. But I agree with Adam Wild- the 2015 Sequoia was far more usable, back seat folds flat to floor, power back window, drove well, held its value & most importantly, was totally reliable. Much simpler power train (bullet proof). New one is bigger outside, and poorer utility inside. And for all its complexity, no significant mpg increase! Keep your 2015 Adam

[@VN-fc1jg]

Legit review. Got tired of other channel reviews on KZbin. Cabin space this, soft touch that, zonk this, panel gap that.

[@jimsomerville3924]

So true. Can't stand reviewers droning on about a bulbous 3 row crossover's cornering or how soft the dash and door trim is.

[@crunchyblack2224]

Nothing wrong with talking about how Toyota missed the mark on a full redesign. The cargo space is laughable, no fold flat 3rd row seats and the knees to chest while sitting in the third row is bad.

[@danielkatani612]

Zonk this😂

[@hagnerplaylists]

Those reviews are in fact disguised ads

[@pkdude5334]

The more new car reviews I see, the more I want an older car

[@JoeBlunt]

I'm driving a 2001 4runner and these reviews make me love it more and more lol

[@faheemabbas3965]

When electric mandates kick in, this country is either going to riot or stay silent. Nothing in between. I’m moving to the Netherlands before this happens because they have bicycle infrastructure so good I wouldn’t have to own a car ever again.

[@Tate.TopG.]

@Faheem Abbas good decision. This country is full of consumers who don't value their life , time, and money.

[@joseph1541]

@@faheemabbas3965 I’m moving to hawaii (big island). Already have a condo there that is getting paid for on Airbnb. My plan is to just move there permanently when it gets super bad on the mainland. One flight away from a new life.

[@skyhawk5469]

Im glad i get to own a 21 Land Cruiser, these new cars and trucks are a joke.

[@tommitchell3330]

Along with the others, I greatly appreciate your honesty and how well informed you are. I previously owned a 2011 Sequoia and presently own a 2017 LX570. Both did and have served me very well with no mechanical problems over 100,000 miles on each vehicle presently. I am very, very reluctant to purchase a hybrid LX or Sequoia in the future. I'm glad to see that you share my reservations.

[@stevetruong3196]

Why do we like to watch your channel? It is because of your honest and unbiased reviews. Keep it up!

[@KingSev]

Yup, same here, I love this guy, I just cancelled my TRD pro sequoia order from the dealer that I’ve been waiting for since last year and I was second in line. After seeing this video. I’m done getting it. I’ll move to waiting for the new land cruiser , hopefully they will do a nether job! Thanks my man appreciate your videos !

[@shafrana2]

@@KingSevWow! What part of car disappoints you to take decision of cancel your order?

[@KingSev]

@@shafrana2 built quality, paint finish, German engineering, IN some places , Cats are too obvious to be stolen, 2 turbos 3 radiators , watch the video in full and be mentioned everything . The major decision was the cargo space . I own a runner now and I’m not gonna get way more space than my runner with a family of 6. So, after seeing this video, I am kind of leaning towards canceling my order and waiting for the Land Cruiser to come back to NA

[@shafrana2]

@@KingSev Maybe Grand Highlander?

[@pablolobo6560]

Land Cruiser all the way! Or a 4Runner. You can't go wrong. Though it looks nice and has some great features, I see too many red flags and a potential money pit on this Sequoia. Also, the approach front angle is ridiculous in my opinion. A Land Cruiser on the other hand is a breeze. Good luck!

[@samaccurso]

After watching this, even more happy keeping my 25 yr. old Lexus with my 4.0 V8 engine.

[@gianmariavolonte4315]

Great review of the Sequoia. My beloved 2017 4Runner was totalled in an accident earlier this year and was looking at this model. For the price, the build quality was unimpressive and there wasn't anything that stood out about it that could justify the price. I settled for a '22 Lexus GX460. Although used, it was much nicer for a fraction of the price.

[@Pistolpete218]

Cheaper sure, much nicer? No

[@gianmariavolonte4315]

@@Pistolpete218 That's your opinion.

[@MaximumDIYGarage]

You didn’t settle, you’ve made a wise choice!!!

[@surfingtothestars]

At least the GX is made in Japan

[@rand0mGT]

You’ve proven you’re a wise man. Good on you

[@jdr03272]

This channel is solid gold. Lots of talking heads trying to do the doug demuro trick. You bring a refreshing perspective and layer of expertise to the car review game and I love it! I wish you great success in this endeavor! Subscribed!

[@bluethundar]

I own a 2003 4WD Sequoia I bought brand new back in 2002. Now 20 yrs and 260K miles later it still runs well, a little banged up on the exterior but most of its parts are still original, only had to replace power steering rack and radiator, and of course the infamous rear door latch. But other than that it's bullet proof. I was so so excited about this new Sequoia when Toyota revealed it. And the first Toyota fan boys that got their hands on the early preproduction unit to review it had nothing but great things to say about it, which only made my excitement grew. But as more and more realistic reviews come out I got really disappointed. This review is the final nail. Thanks for talking about the details of this engine, I did not know it has so many radiators and separate cooling systems, just a disaster waiting to happen, among many other negatives.

[@barrywiseman7012]

We had a 2002 Sequoia LTD when they first came out. Same experience-steering rack and rear latch twice. But otherwise great. Better quality seats than our 2015 model. Drove more in size and tighter steering feel than our 2015 Sequoia. More like the 2022 4Runner we have now. Turning circle of 2002 Sequoia & 2022 4R are similiar - not too great-but liveable. The 2015 Sequoia had excellent short turning circle radius for tight parking manoeuvres, but at the expense of too much power assist, and wander in crosswinds. I trust the Toyota quality, but I agree with Mario Meas above-too complicated engine/drivetrain for insignificant increase in mpg, and confidence in long term reliability

[@styledliving]

Yeah, the real upgrade to a 4WD Sequoia is a Land Cruiser or LX. Slightly less cargo capacity, but all the modern refinements we want. Fortunately the 100-series models are really well priced, even low miles ones. Mike Sweers missed the target here with his choice in NiMH batteries instead of Lithium/LiFePO4 chemistries. They could've made the vehicle more upright and stored the batteries on the sides above and to the rear of the wheel wells. We lose a lot of interior width because wheel wells are covered by interior panels and subsequently lost/under utilized storage. The Grand Highlander is going to be a great city and typical road trip vehicle, but it's not a true 4WD vehicle that can articulate over rough terrain that a Body on Frame configuration can. It's just such a shame that the interior cargo capability of the Sequoia was diminished to the point that it couldn't even work for offroading. Even Expedition Overland has to compromise greatly due to Toyota North America's design decisions. It's ironic, but the 4runner actually has more cargo capacity behind the 1st row than the Sequoia.

[@bobw9297]

$ 80000 buys a lot of fuel in your old one at 3mpg more same problem with my 2010 Rav $ 45000 buys a lot of fuel for 2mpg more ..

[@rickgalla3377]

I have same year as you, 235k miles, also steering rack, 2 calipers a d lift gate handle, truck is bulletproof, this new one is way overengineered/NO THANK U

[@Blakecryderman7244]

@@bobw9297 exactly! So many people miss this

[@calebizsol]

Now, this is information a consumer can use to make an educated purchase. The rest of the reviewers just talk about what the buttons do. I can do that by going to the dealer. You explained the function of the inverter. Nice..... Thanks.

[@mrjj1f]

I hope Toyota is listing to this review. What were they thinking? $80,000 for a "beta" version of a vehicle. Fantastic review.

[@fanboiahoy260]

@@joeblack1052you can’t afford it why does it matter?

[@fanboiahoy260]

You just can’t afford it

[@ruizces]

I think that Toyota is pursuing the same strategy of Apple and Samsung. Pay a lot for something that won’t last more than three years without starting to give you performance issues.

[@jasonj4326]

@@joeblack1052 What I've read online about the situation is that Toyota Japan did have plans to drop it but Toyota North America wanted something in that class and made a bunch of promises. It's also why we won't be getting a Land Cruiser for a while. My only gripe is why they spent so much R&D on the front end but then skimped out putting the bulky rear suspension in there which removed the space for the battery which leads into the cargo availability.

[@richardspeckymh]

They’re not listening. Nobody wants this complicated mess, especially while not getting a worthwhile increase in MPG.

[@Tottorul]

These car walkthroughs are invaluable. Best ive seen on the internet. Keep doing them!

[@MeAtLoVeRsXD]

This guy is the “fine print” in any letter agreement🙌🏼

[@马k]

I think I'll stay with the proven V-8 non turbo engine and buy used Land Cruiser. Great review.

[@Kevin19700]

As an owner of a 2015 Crewmax 5.7 I agree. I’m a bit concerned about turbos and any sort of ultra high pressure direct injection. Time will tell.

[@Michael-db4sn]

​@Paul good way to look at it. Way overdone.

[@shanepipkin4041]

the government is banning them. I agree

[@jamram9924]

@@Kevin19700 Toyota has dual injectors (port and GDI) on their engines to eliminate those carbon build up issues.

[@lightsfansofthewest481]

​@@jamram9924 The problem is that turbos get very hot and they also force more air into an engine.

[@tombusselle9844]

Excellent review. I agree with your "Germanized" description 100% and they need to get rid of whoever is making all these decisions to add so much complexity on the engineering side. Makes me cringe thinking about the cost and time that will be involved repairing these things.

[@jsnow6925]

So glad I got the 2021 4runner, I plan on keeping it forever even if I get another daily. It is about as bulletproof you can get with proper maintenance. I think any car in the future I buy will be after the model is out a few years and the kinks are worked out. May do a lexus hybrid next but going to wait and observe for a few years

[@THX5000]

One of the few still made in Japan.

[@skoolynugenator1802]

Yep I have a 2022 and it truly is my favorite vehicle. Built like a tank.

[@jsnow6925]

@@skoolynugenator1802 100%, never had a toyota before but am a convert. I don't mind putting money into accessories/upgrades either since I know I will get potentially decades of use out of them.

[@4Runner123]

I picked up a 2022 4Runner before things change to 4 cyl turbo for the reliability. Couldn’t be happier! On the wait list for a gx460 before the v8 disappears. Down to #2 on the wait list at the dealership.

[@indycharlie]

What kind of MPG are you folks getting at 70-75 MPH with your 4Runners ?

[@asmallchild9295]

The most honest and straight forward car review channel I’ve ever laid my ears or eyes on. Thank you. *subscribed now*!!!

[@edishergiorgadze4413]

I was thinking about but... I'll better stick to my OLD dinosaurs which is 20 years older and with 225K miles still runs like a charm. Thanks for review, great !

[@thepcuser5469]

I would have the older one, here is why: 1. More cargo space 2. More third row space 3. N/A V8 vs twin turbocharged hybrid V6 (which had reported waste gate issues in the tundra) 4. More reliable If the new sequoia had the same amount of cargo, third row space and the V8 i would choose it over the old one, but in this case, I will pick the old one

[@Winterstick549]

And the third row was removable in the older ones.

[@Youtubeuser1aa]

So if the new one was a newer version of the old one, you’d buy the new one.

[@realbadash]

I was told by a salesman from whome I have bought 7 Toyotas that the new sequoia has road noise problems, among others. Hard pass.

[@everydayfun9531]

Yea I'd buy the old sequoia too due to cargo space

[@jonathansanchez10]

The best Toyota technician in whole USA 🇺🇸

[@WiseTreee]

In worldwide

[@jzila9900]

master*^

[@mzaher]

I’m new to this channel, this is the best car review I’ve ever seen in my life.

[@mr3klax]

Excellent technical review AMD. You continue to set the bar. Your videos inspire me to take better care of my Toyotas. Kudos too to your video production team. Thank you!👍🏼👍🏼

[@RootoftheRoots]

My main target is the newly released Toyota Grand Highlander, but I'm not speaking with any dealer yet until I get to see your full comprehensive review on that car. I love your honesty in reviewing these Toyota cars. Jah Bless!

[@THEH2OMAN]

That's cool, but I prefer my dinosaur Toyota trucks with a V8. I do wish the dinosaur V8 trucks had a rear suspension similar to this Sequoia, less auto leveling air springs. Is there a 3rd row seating and shelf DELETE option?

[@flight2k5]

The fact you think the previous tundra is a dinosaur 🤣😂

[@japerezo75]

Sir, you hit the nail spot-on! I had a rental tundra for a week and as a former BMW owner I started to recognize some German influence on the design of the engine. This 3.4 engine is over-stressed at 122 Hp/L . It drives really nice but will probably need new turbos at 100K miles.

[@jkfuel]

Love it. What a thorough and honest review. Very few folks would comment on fit/ finish as in depth as you would. Keep it up.

[@ToyotaTacoma-js6on]

Sounds like Toyota went backwards instead of forward on the new Sequoia. Too complicated engine and drivetrain, gas mileage not improved but a small amount, rear storage area is very weird. And of course the price is too high. I think the Lexus GX is a better buy. I do not think this will be a big seller for Toyota . This is definitely a vehicle only a highly trained Toyota mechanic will be able to work on. If you buy one, you better buy the extended warranty. As for myself, I will not even consider the Sequoia. Excellent review of the Sequoia. I appreciate your honest reviews.

[@MauiWauiPineappleExpress]

The problem with the fit an finish like the orange peel is that it's build in America! Not happening with the Toyota's build in Japan! Toyota should adres that!

[@luisrivera496]

I’m keeping my 2005 sequoia great truck Ilove almost 300.000 miles in running like champ

[@joestory1]

And that’s why I follow this Channel !!! …. Honest Reviews !!!

[@CORVAIRWILD]

Too complicated

[@The8429]

Similar to a female

[@Twoseasons2]

If everyone had this mentality we would still be riding in horse carriages to this day 😒

[@hswami74]

​@Gangsterlife333 Instead, we have complicated cars and life

[@hss8973]

It's 2023, buddy!

[@copisetic1104]

2023 is going to be F up.

[@yesidalf]

Very detailed and huge professional video. I never seen a trusted and serious technical revision

[@rossifumifan1]

You are the best authority on toyota on KZbin.

[@edbarrett4969]

Great job on a great review. I love the candor and honesty. I was pondering on replacing my 2016 Tahoe LTZ and figured to check out the new Sequoia. After this review, don't think I will bother. A seemingly unnecessary hybrid system, overcomplication of systems and mechanics (like BMW), paint and fit/finish issues tell me to look elsewhere. Actually, my Tahoe is looking better and better! Thanks again. Keep up the good work.

[@marcosespinoza470]

Keep your Tahoe those engines are made to last over 300k miles. Just give it love and replace parts that might need replacements soon. You’ll save a lot of money by not buying this new car.

[@danielmeador1991]

Keep that Tahoe if you really need to replace it for an upgrade get the newer Tahoe

[@270eman]

You sure about that? Those 5.3s were losing lifters off the lot. 😂@@marcosespinoza470

[@7THxSIGN]

The most in-depth 2023 Sequoia review I have seen. Wow! Thank you!

[@seacoastlife]

I can't wait to see you review the new 2023 regular highlander (not the hybrid). Absolutely love your videos, thank you!

[@loiseywillis4824]

I so appreciate your reviews. I love the looks of the Sequoia and want to get out of my Aviator. I purchased the Aviator on my own and it’s been a big mistake. I’m a widow and it’s so overwhelming making such a large purchase without my husband’s knowledge. I don’t want to screw up again like I did purchasing the Aviator. Thanks so much!

[@penegakkeadilanpembasmikej5022]

Always grateful to God for a good and honest mechanic to have a nice workshop

[@Its_takaa]

Had to subscribe because of how detailed this video is, no one else talks about the actual important stuff.

[@cpscps2679]

My '06 Sequoia with 221k runs like new. No reason to buy a new one !

[@danielclawson2099]

4.7 2UZFE can do that if maintained. Hopefully the timing belt has been changed at good intervals.

[@jamram9924]

That 4.7 engine has logged 1,000,000 miles and Toyota repurchased at least 4 Tundras back from their owners. Keep up with the maintenance and it will last for many many years!

[@Bobdacat67]

Loved the honest review. I was really looking forward to the new Sequoia, then I saw the cargo area, what the hell were they thinking. I get better gas mileage with my 2013 4Runner and although no 3rd row, has more cargo capacity.

[@mojavedesertsonorandesert9531]

This has convinced me to look for the prior model with the V8 from some retirement community! 😉

[@summerofsam99]

A subject matter expert sharing their knowledge for the pure purp to pass on knowledge is so wonderful to see. Especially for someone who is trying to find legit reviews from experts

[@LAAM619]

i just bought a 2004 sequoia. it had 139k miles. paid $3k for it. its in stellar condition.

[@HermannTheGreat]

Which family member sold it to you? On the low end those miles on that vehicle would fetch 16k

[@LAAM619]

@@HermannTheGreat no family. It was a private seller off craigslist in poway, ca. Took my mechanic and everything checked out. Dude wanted $5k and we talked it down to $3k cus it needed $1500 in maintenance.

[@HermannTheGreat]

@@LAAM619 Pretty great deal, congrats. I hope that lasts a very long time for you cause it's great to hear when people are able to get good deals on cars. They're so few and far between I think.

[@williamardenjr116]

@@LAAM619 must be a rebuilt title

[@LAAM619]

@@williamardenjr116 nope.

[@enthused7591]

Gotta say, that's one of the best-looking vehicles I've ever seen of any kind.

[@jskaggs8188]

Great review. I really enjoy the way you get into the technical bits.

[@fish4kbcf]

How can you not like this guy. One of my good friends and someone I’ve trusted with all larger jobs on my Toyota trucks is also a Toyota Master Tech and has 40+ years of experience. They are very similar in their approach and their breakdown of the new vehicles

[@Thankyou_3]

Great review, makes the 2023 4Runner and 2023 GX a real gems in the market. If I would be in the market for an SUV, I would run to buy the 4Runner or GX.

[@ahumpage]

I agree. Twin-turbo V6 is recipe for future disaster -- to our wallet

[@randomrazr]

@@ahumpage hw so

[@Thankyou_3]

@@randomrazr the New Sequoia is full new technology and more moving parts. I am not convinced it will be trouble free long term. This is a lease and return vehicle not a buy vehicle….unless you want to pay for your mechanic’s retirement savings 😂

[@youtubecarspottersguide1]

4runner trd off road or TRD pro best off road tail rig , GX is sold as the LC prado in other markets 4cy diesel lot better looking than the GX , v8 gas and the 3rd row kills it for off-road overlander car campers who want payload and packing space for our kit

[@robinsamuel8040]

I agree

[@rnmendozaphotography]

This is my first time owning a full sized SUV and after driving the ‘24 Sequoia Platinum for the past six weeks,here are my observations. First the seats are firmer compared to the Expedition Limited and Infinity QX80. Gas Mileage 13-15MPG City 18-23MPG Hwy. it is more fuel efficient to use “Normal” mode when driving on city streets with stop and go traffic. Full tank on a road trip is approximately 450miles. The drive is very comfortable. There’s seems to be an issue with the power liftgate. If you opened the rear hatch and not made sure it was completely shut, you will have the error tone when using the liftgate. Indoor cabin is very quiet, ventilated and heated seats are very comfortable. The vehicle does not have the Toyota “Digital Key”but the Toyota App for remote start and lock/unlock works. I am unsure why it was not available. For charging your phones, this comes with both USB A and USB C ports. It doesn’t have the traditional “cigarette adapter”.

[@MrRensan404]

A great honest review. All the pros and cons raised were valid considerations. I like the exterior design, but there are a lot of features that were not well thought of. For the price, the small “imperfections” will be hard to excuse.

[@ekxiong]

This is the BEST car review on KZbin. Thank you so much for your honest review.

[@Duhaubetahiks]

Excellent, unbiased review! I own a 4runner and a GX460, I was considering the new Sequoia but not anymore, thank you! Also, I think when Toyota decided that the Sequoia will be the new Land Cruiser, hence the price tag! Makes no sense Toyota!

[@MaximumDIYGarage]

I’m a GX470 owner. Do you find the 4Runner underpowered as compared to your GX? I’ve driven 22 TR4 in town and it was adequate. Is the lack of power noticeable when merging on a highway?

[@Duhaubetahiks]

@@MaximumDIYGarage adequate- yes, but the GX460 has a lot more power at lower rpms, 6speed transmission, awd system, I am getting the same fuel consumption as the 4runner just quieter, smoother ride with more power. Only downside is the premium fuel for the GX. For a dedicated off roader the 4runner wins- better ground clearance, approach and departure angles! Now the GX470 is a different animal, I used to own an LX470 with the same engine, the 4runner is definitely faster and more fuel efficient than the older V8 on the GX470

[@aldomassa7473]

Excellence…. This is the epitome of a honest review, exactly what Toyota customers review, ponder, and eventually, choose what is best for them. I believe Toyota is following what this MT says. Toyota is known for listening to customer feedback. Personally, I don’t see $80k, case in point…. Watch TCCN review for the LC 500, spectacular design detail, watch the video and see the comparison as to fit and finish, literally night and day, this has been an ongoing issue. just listening to what my Toyota friends say as to interior, plastic and more plastic. The reviews are ROCK solid. Thanks as always. Bendiciones caballero.

[@FierceProtocol]

More important than carbon buildup, the D4S engine does not use direct injection until thew engine warms up. Thereby, not putting gasoline into your engine oil. That is the most important thing that I am surprised you didn't mention.

[@wesfields9322]

The 1st gens are everything. The exterior design and humble capabilities. 2uz 4.7l is one of the best engines to exist

[@channelnamehere4065]

I placed an order for one then dropped it after test driving because I cannot justify the price. I was going to trade in the Sienna but that does so much better with people and cargo for grocery getting that I couldn't let it go. This is too compromised. It's too bad, cause it looks great!

[@rightlanehog3151]

The Sienna is the common sense alternative that too many 'cool' people avoid.

[@johnbjorkman4144]

We have a 2014 Sequoia with 231k miles on it (so far). My main complaint is the size of the gas tank. When we're towing, we get single digit mileage and have to be very careful on long hauls, especially in the mountains. This new version gets the same mileage, but has a smaller tank. My only other complaint is that the nav system that doesn't update - unless you spend a few hundred bucks for a new chip. Our Garmin fills that gap. I'm kinda shocked about the rear seat business. In my old Sequoia, the third row lays flat, making for a huge cargo area. Plus the second row lays flat and is even with the third row. I can easily put a sheet of plywood in there. This new design actually takes away a great feature. Hopefully Toyota can work out some of the kinks and shortcomings if our current one ever wears out.

[@chris3407]

I’m not as concerned about the power train as most. This engine has been used in the Lexus for years and we haven’t seen major issues. If you don’t need a large suv to tow, I completely agree with AMD… The Grand Highlander is the way to go.

[@rightlanehog3151]

Well said.

[@user-tb7rn1il3q]

I’m actually surprised that Toyota stayed with Body on Frame. With the Grand Highlander there isn’t really much point in having a Sequoia. I wouldn’t be surprised if the next Sequoia is a Grand Grand Highlander. The 7th Gen 4R will probably be based on the same unibody architecture with much more clearance, articulation, and approach/departure angles.

[@dep6169]

Great video. Your understanding is way beyond your years. The way you break down the engine changes and comparison made between other makes it very good.

[@kt5924-c9r]

Great video as usual. Toyota has made this truck way too complicated. I see long-term issues written all over this car. People will miss the old Sequoia.

[@jeffreycash1572]

Probably

[@nenesgarage7103]

No other KZbin channel compares to yours. Other KZbin channels only mention the vehicles’ general information that’s found in Toyota’s own website. But you my friend, provide us a more in depth mechanical information. We are so blessed by your knowledge and wisdom our Lord has given you. What an amazing way to fulfill your purpose. Your calling. God bless you, your family and the whole team.

[@qlmotorsport]

Love the in-depth detail here. I've got a second gen and IMO there are two massive steps backward in this car - the first is actually the solid rear. Solid rear on its own is fine, but that plus the battery leads to the horrendous ergonomic 2nd and 3rd row situation. Not what shoppers want these days out of a 3 row SUV, especially one of this price. Would have much rather they kept the IRS, which the gen 2 had. The other issue is that they dropped the torsen diff in the transfer case. Again, maybe better for off-roading, but basically unusable if you wanted to use 4hi as an "AWD" mode. How many suburbanites are going to realize that and leave it in 4hi? Major disappointment for me, as I was looking forward to this car for a long time. Looking at the Grand Highlander now, despite the lower towing capacity. The GH's 2nd and 3rd row setup is the same as the 2nd gen Sequoia, which is great

[@mojorisin7371]

I appreciate your in depth technical reviews. Thanks for taking the time to explain the finer technical details of each vehicle. You really seem to enjoy this and I do to. ✌🏾❤

[@Patriot768]

I think this would have been a killer full-size SUV is they had made both rows easily removable, similar to what you would find in mini-vans back in the day. Heck, even a removable third row would have been awesome. Huge misstep that's going to take this off a lot of shopping lists despite everything else the Sequoia has going for it.

[@homerv9654]

my 2001 Sequoia's still running strong with well over 280,000 miles. transmission and engine had been rebuilt once plus a few small parts replaced, overall I spent close to $4,500 on repair bills for the last 22 years. love my Sequoia.

[@johnconklin5180]

I made a wise choice with my 2022 4Runner. This vehicle is way too complicated with so many systems that can fail. Not to mention an insane price. To those who buy them good luck.

[@MaximumDIYGarage]

Indeed

[@bige311]

Those 2022 4 runners are sweet

[@silicron]

Your videos are the most in-depth I have found on the web. Amazing work! I wish you did these videos for makes other than Toyota and Lexus.

[@oldschool6268]

Great review, I have a 2007 5.7 Tundra crew max, and a 2012 5.7 sequoia, and some other toys, but the 2022 and up tundra turned me off, I know the EPA is messing everything up, my plan is to locate a 2021 tundra with 5.7 low mile and keep moving on.

[@alexanderharispuru1465]

Man .. its just overingeered remember when i had my 4.2 diesel hj 60 land cruiser.. no turbo no electric stuff.. that thing made 640 000 km without missing a beat. The thing that killed it was rust.

[@eliastamez8413]

Glad I went with the ‘23 GX. Hopefully Toyota works on improving fit and finish. Always better to wait a few years so the details like this can be fixed. Plus I saved at least 25k with the GX over the Sequoia. 😅

[@haduong5828]

How much is the old 2023 Lexus GX costs now? How did you save 25k compare to the new 2023 with all new technologies in the Toyota Sequoia? Everything on the GX is too old. It needs big changes. We’re in the modern life as time goes on! I bought the 2019 GX almost a year ago and thinking about selling it soon!

[@David-qt6xx]

LOL Nice

[@stevenyoo731]

you probably saved 25K because GX = 4 Runner in terms of size, LX is equivaent to Sequoia.

[@eliastamez8413]

@@stevenyoo731 yes I know, but I still saved 25k because the GX was 61k and the Sequoia was at least 87k in the trim I wanted without markups. I could have bought either one and picked the GX, so I saved money by going for the cheaper one.

[@eliastamez8413]

@@haduong5828 mine was 61k brand new

[@stephenrmunday4869]

I have this model with 8K miles. On a 400 mile trip up the East coast from Virginia to New York we got 23 mpg. I consistently get an average of 19.3 0:15 mpg in mixed driving. You failed to mention the horsepower of this twin turbo charged V-6 as compared to the old V-8. This engine produces 100 more horsepower. We traded in a 2012 Sequoia for the model year and the new power train blows the doors off the old V-8. The acceleration in this vehicle is nothing short of amazing. I totally agree with your assessment on the interior trim and the rear storage. It is a bit disappointing. Having own both types of Sequoias, I am happy with this new model. Nothing in this world is perfect and unfortunately there are compromises to make. But, I willing to compromise the storage issue for the power that I got in return. I love your reviews, subscribe to your channel and I don’t think there is anyone else that can convey their professional opinion and knowledge in a more engaging manner.

[@raycollington4310]

Great review AMD. I like the look of this, just a shame the Toyota design team followed the German car industry down the over complicated route.

[@sunbeam8866]

@@ConsoleCombat With a price to match!

[@chriswilhelm1256]

Thank you for the in depth review! I own a 2021 Sequoia. I’m so glad I bought it when I did. People said I should wait for the new model, but I didn’t want the complexity of twin turbos (and especially the hybrid system). After seeing your review I like my dinosaur even more.

[@kellyscarolinagarden]

Hi Chris, 2021 yours is not a dinosaur.😊 Now, my Sequoia is definitely a dinosaur😅. I have a 2001 base model. I just replaced my four wheel drive actuator. A month later my alternator/battery. Those were the original parts not to bad.

[@SuperSnakePlissken]

I asked myself this question about three months ago and I can tell you the answer is NO! I currently have a 2015 Sequoia Limited 4x4 and four kids and a wife. We bought it when our kids were small knowing one day they would be adult sized teenagers. Anyway, my kiddos are 17, 15, 13, and 11. Anyway, I took the family to Toyota to get the transmission serviced, the break fluid changed, and an oil change while I was there, and had the whole family get into a 2023 Sequoia Limited that was at the dealership. My two oldest boys heads hit the roof in the back, they all recognized it was not only shorter but smaller in general, and my wife hated the fact there wasn't as much room in the back to store stuff and groceries. Technology was nice but honestly I don't give a crap about that. I only care about reliability and low cost of ownership. I asked them all should we trade in the 2015 Sequoia for this new one and 100% of my family said almost at the same time NO WAY. Bottom line, if you need a vehicle this large by the last generation. It's cheaper, it is bullet proof, and mpg is not as bad as people say. Plus, mpg doesn't matter. What matters is entry cost and long term cost. Just one repair these days and you've wiped out any so-called mpg savings. Also, the mpg this vehicle gets is pretty much what I am getting in my current Sequia. I cannot understand how this I-Force-Max is superior to the I-Force 5.7L V8 at all outside of an extra 70 lbs of torque. You don't need it. That V8 even when fully loaded with the entire family and all our luggage and gear pulls out into traffic just fine and gets 14-15 city and 17-18 highway all day.

[@Uno91180]

AMD, please make an update video on the V35 addressing the bearing issue. Many tundra owners as well as sequoia and like me LX 600. I love it, but am Worried. I’m sure the masses of tundra owners would appreciate this video as well. Love your videos, thank you for all you do.

[@RichardCWard]

Really like the new Sequoia, the Tundra Truck Frame and towing capacity is a key advantage over the Highlander.

[@kevin_m110]

The fenders and quarters are not flat. There’s a profile to them. Shot at 25:50 shows this. It’s not a full on flare, which I think is what you were trying to illustrate. This thing is beautiful though!

[@imeprezime1069]

How I see it: If they drop a version that is not a hybrid, and utilize the space where hybrid system was to store third row seats, this will be AMAZING!

[@electrikoptik]

Or they will end up making a "Grand Sequoia" with a proper third row.

[@imnotusingmyrealname4566]

They apparently only mandated the hybrid system to increase profits. Maybe when this thing gets a refresh it will get the normal engine.

[@swissmrkc]

Then you'll have like 15-17 mph gallon city..... That's not going to cut it in 2023

[@imnotusingmyrealname4566]

@@swissmrkc Wrong. The non-hybrid in the Tundra is rated for the same MPG as the hybrid Tundra.

[@grouchosays]

This guy is incredibly knowledgeable. But he is also hilarious. He’s kind of “courtly” or “dignified “ in his manner. I could listen to him all day!

[@jdwar11]

Really impressed with the looks of this vehicle with the TRD Pro trim. I will consider one in about 20 years. No way I am going to be buying any new vehicles ever again.

[@TheBuckeyeFarm]

Gas will be over well over $15 a gallon and this car won't be allowed on the roads in 20 years.

[@dmitryadamenko6518]

​@@TheBuckeyeFarm salaries will be over 300k and no one ever ban gas engines

[@christianramo]

This is the most honest review I ever seen for sure, thanks a lot, cos this gonna make the big difference when the decision comes. I think for this time the Gmc won

[@beexiong2995]

Heat exchangers or individual radiators for each turbo prevents heatsoak and power loss. These days turbo engines have this. Plus this engine will mostlikely be used for towing. You need all the cooling you can get. Ive seen nissan have heatsoak issues in their twin turbo V6 in the q60 because their heat exchangers are too inefficient. Toyota did their homework to make sure that doesn't happen

[@Vidme01]

Dude, you rock! Just saw a TRD Pro and it was gorgeous. Now that I know about the power train and the interior quality, this is off my radar.

[@imnotusingmyrealname4566]

If it's good that the spare tire doesn't have a tire pressure sensor because it's one less sensor then why do we have tire pressure sensors on the other 4 wheels? Having a sensor in the spare is good because it alerts you that it's low so you pump it up so it has the appropriate pressure when you need it.

[@garyf2871]

Yes I wish have the sensor in my 2015 Sequoia spare. Every year I have to drop it and check it. Sometimes it's up to 5-6psi off and sometimes it's ok at 2-3psi off. It's crazy how toyota packages their cars. Wife's 2011 Highlander Limited has the spare pressure sensor and even puts out the psi numbers. However my 2015 Sequoia limited, is just the pressure warning light, no psi readout, and no sensor on spare.

[@chris3407]

I don’t want it on my spare. Air it up, check it once a year. Life is good. I don’t feel the need to maintain pressure on a spare that hopefully I never use.

[@matte8441]

I work at a shop and we actually have a lot of customers top off the 4 main tires to 60 or so psi because they weren’t aware the spare had a sensor and the TPWS light wouldn’t turn off so they kept on adding air.

[@imnotusingmyrealname4566]

@@matte8441 lmao that's hilarious

[@wchen6026]

solid gold, all your content. most of stuff we see on youtube, is about specs, amenities and how the driving feels, etc. all of that, useless, consumers can read and test drive to get the same information. what matters more is how the parts work mechanically and pros/cons of technologies, those can't be delivered without years of expertise. hats off to you sir, gold content, newly subscribed and hope you get to 1M subscribers soon

[@coppcar]

I don't care for batteries in my car(other than the one used to start the thing). I might be wrong, probably am, have been before, but I see eCars as a fools errand. But, I could be interested in a hydrogen fuel cell...or not. PS. Turbo 6 = mistake. Avoid turbo and batteries. I'm so pleased I bought a new Runner in '19. I live in Wisconsin, and garage the thing when salt is on the roads. At my age, it will last the rest of my life and be worth a lot then.i run an 07 Highlander with 185k in the winter.

[@jamesday7344]

I agree with you. With that being said there were people who saw vehicles as a passing fad and would never give up their horse drawn buggy

[@musclecarsrt2324]

I really like your unbiased opinion. I wish there were more Technicians like yourself. I enjoy your channel, keep up the good work. Ty

[@jasontani4668]

Another excellent, unbiased car review! I’m really looking forward to one on the new Grand Highlander when you can get one. I have a 2014 Highlander I want to replace basically because the 3rd row seat is useless for adults and the Grand Highlander looks like it fixes that issue.

[@olegdonin9331]

The most scientific review I ever watched. Loved it.

[@beeslandscaping]

They have 3 recalls already to new to buy same with the tundra I wait 3 years for all bugs and updates

[@camaro6810]

Appreciate your HONEST reviews! You think the way I do, LOVE Toyota but always ways to do things better, and not everyone gets everything right, even Toyota can do things better. Love the videos and nice to get a mechanics viewpoint.

[@iggibars]

I can't believe how expensive these SUVs have gotten. INSANE! I remember shopping for a Sequoia/Tahoe/Suburban fully loaded in the low 40s. Ended up going with a loaded Suburban LT and Z71 for less than 40k out the door(meaning tax included). I always wanted to own a Sequoia, but the Suburbans have always been the better option for multiple reasons. I was really looking forward to this new gen Sequoia coming out, but just shocked at the price. I know options have changed through the years, and maybe you can argue that's a reason why prices have gone up, but you can only argue that up to a certain point. And dropping the V8? I love my Toyota and Lexus LS V8s. Dropping the V8 in such a heavy car has completely removed it from my list of future SUVs in my driveway. I don't understand what Toyota os doing lately.

[@marcodarko6941]

Toyota/Lexus is downsizing all their engines. I remember in 2012 the Rav4 V6 was dropped now the 2023 Highlander the V6 was dropped for a turbo 4 cylinder, bummer for me because the Highlander is what I prefer. Even the Grand Highlander coming out in 2024 won't be a V6, which I feel should at the very least be an option. The V8 in the Tundra is dropped as well.. bureaucrats in the government putting the screws on carmakers.

[@joegrahe3958]

I bought the very first year of the Sequoia in late 2000. The SR5 MSRP was 36-37 and the Limited was 41-42.

[@rogueone9214]

Thank you for the honest review. You nailed it for $80,000 it's trimmed off all wrong. I'll bust that front end off the lot. I prefer naturally aspirated engines. .

[@LV4TD101]

I'll wait another 10 years until they do the next refresh on this or the tundra, before I think about buying one, lol. Until then I will just keep putting more and more reliable miles on my old school non turbo 2014 Tundra 😁

[@amonmasumna3784]

Wonderful detailed review. My opinion is that despite all those little issues, it should be a wonderful machine and reliable

[@Mr67Stanger]

Great in-depth non-drive review. After the Land Cruiser was gone, the Sequoia has taken a bigger role in the lineup. So you would have expected a “feel” closer to the LC, in between the two vehicles. But it feels very much like a Tundra. I have a lot of faith in the new powertrain. Not too concerned abt the fit and finish. Was this designed in Calty also?

[@dumitrumalcoci7873]

Great job! This is exactly what I want to hear when looking for a car review.

[@ryanm5626]

Great review! This is the in-depth walkaround I've been looking for. I think you make some really good points. I hope this V6 holds up as well as the old V8, but with not much better MPGs, I don't really see the point. The new V6 is faster, but I've never really been driving my 5.7 and wished it had more power.

[@ozarkliving7263]

I agree fully

[@user-tb7rn1il3q]

Going from 13mpg to 18mph in a larger, heavier, and faster car is a huge improvement. The 5.7 V8 had many issues when it came out.

[@user-tb7rn1il3q]

@@Triangle27. No, it was because the V6 was underpowered at low revs and service was complicated. The real world gas mileage in bumper to bumper traffic is a lot better.

[@skoolynugenator1802]

@@user-tb7rn1il3q maybe but that 5.7 is an excellent engine now.

[@user-tb7rn1il3q]

@@skoolynugenator1802 It’s an ok engine. It still suffers from cam tower leaks and occasional catastrophic failure for unknown reasons. It’s no 1GR, which is a perfect engine. The 2GR is underpowered at low revs and leaks oil.

[@thelundeys52]

Thank you so much for an honest, transparent review.