Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 - The Most Important Lens You'll Ever Own

[@davidroman143]

Thanks Steven this was a great video you sold me on getting the 24-70 2.8!

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

Have fun with it

[@dirkwaals2013]

Great video, just got mine on a A7iv. Works like a charm! Keep it up 👍🏼

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

Thank you I’m glad to hear that

[@najwanahmed4077]

Amazing! Thanks Steven for this excellent video! You covered all aspects perfectly! Now I can't wait to try it!

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

Thanks for the feedback. I am glad it was helpful. Let me knowing you have any questions.

[@tourinojacks5844]

Thank you as this is a good vid and I appreciate your reviews. Your mic, what did you use for this vid? Love the sound!

[@stavrosk.2868]

Hello. I had the sony zeiss 24-70mm second hand but had to return it (fully refunded 700 euro) because it gut stuck at 70mm (too expensiveto repair). Now I'm very hesitant to buy another Carl Zeiss. Is this Sigma a good alternative.

[@worldadventuretravel]

Is this the Art series or the one before that?

[@ChrisFlores22]

I use the sigma 24-105 on my gh6 with a speedbooster and it’s awesome. Lots of zoom range and opens up to f2.5. On my s1h, I’m selling my lumix 24-70 because it’s just too expensive to not be using it much lol so question! Would you sell the lumix 24-70 and get the sigma 24-70 or would you just stick to using the 24-105 at f4 on my full frame s1h? I shoot interviews, where I mainly use the sigma 24-35, 50 1.4 & 85 1.4. The sigma 24-105 lives on my gh6 but wondering if having both sigma zooms is redundant? Thanks!

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

If I would have to choose which one to keep between the 24-105 f4 and the 24-70 f2.8 I would pick the f2.8 version every single time. my biggest downside of the sigma is the weight. it is pretty heavy but the quality is really good. Maybe check out how much you actually use the focal range from 70-105 and if you actually utilize it. you can see that Lightroom. maybe that can help you make a choice. I find it really hard to give a clear recommendation in that regard. I hope that helps.

[@ChrisFlores22]

@@StevenSchulzPhoto I literally only shoot video. I think I’ll keep the 24-105 since it gives me a great reach and it works on both of my camera mounts. Thanks man!

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

@@ChrisFlores22 Sounds good man. 👍

[@jriis2010]

Thanks for a great video. You mention that the F4 version is a little bit more expensive than the 2.8 version. In fact, it can almost always be used as a rule of thumb, that the 2.8 version is at least twice as expensive. Same goes for the last of the holy trinity, the 70-200, which in 2.8 is often 3 times more expensive than the F4 version

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

Valid point. They are definitely significantly more expensive. Thanks for adding that.

[@davidgrg21]

man your voice and accent reminds me of the track "Giorgio by Moroder" from Daftpunk. Anyways.. thanks for the amazing video.

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

haha awesome. Thank you!

[@NowWeEats]

I contacted B&H and I asked them what's a good lens for use on a BMPCC 6K in a podcast where the camera is about 3 to 8ft away. How do you feel about that?

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

To be honest it strongly depends on different factors. One big thing I like about it is that you don’t have to deal with a large amount of distortion at 24mm and have a really strong zoom especially when the distance to the subject is not that far. But there are more factors that need to be considered to make a good decision. The size of set, how many people will be in the scene… b&h are pretty knowledgeable when it comes to that though.

[@vasanthkali05]

Is this Sigma lens comparable to M50 Mark ii? Please suggest any best zoom lens for it.

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

You probably need an adapter but it should work.

[@vasanthkali05]

@@StevenSchulzPhoto can you suggest the adaptor?

[@brucefuchs4089]

Used to live in the Fan District near the corner of Floyd & Allen- two blocks from your initial setup. Love seeing RVA in your shots. Have the Sigma 50mm1.4. Next Sigma purchase will probably wait for them to release in RF mount. Keep up the good work.

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

Thank you I am glad to hear that! Yeah I am definitely curious which RF mount they are going to come out with

[@kelvinbott1615]

Is there really any difference using a DG (not DN) in a Mirrorless body?

[@CyrilandClaire]

Is it compatible to canon m50?

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

You gonna need a ef to m adapter for that if I am not mistaken

[@wonderher08]

Good review. Tempted to buy it. Currently have sony,16-35 F4 and 50mm F1.4. Should I buy this sigma lens

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

its hard to say. I have a similar lens line up and also have the 24-70 and that's my most used lens. I think it definitely depends on what you shoot mostly. Do you mostly do video and what kind of photography do you mostly do?

[@wonderher08]

Thank you for yr reply. Not video. More on landscape, street and portrait. I also have sony 70-200mm F4.

[@artemkan3040]

great review! what is the diameter of the focus ring btw?

[@J3R3MY-Sigman]

Just bought this lens for my R6Mk2 so excited it was a good purchase!

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

Glad to hear that!

[@rahull7866]

Please share your thoughts it was good to buy this for canon rp ? Wht you think and howz its performance

[@J3R3MY-Sigman]

@@rahull7866 performance is really good. It’s super fast autofocus and control has been awesome. It is heavier than the Canon version, but worth it for what you get from it IMO. I’ve shot thousands and thousands of pics with it so far and I’m very happy overall with the results

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

@rahull7866 I don’t regret getting this lens. I am still using it on my canon eos r until this day.

[@ak_hoops]

Thank you for this! This was definitely helpful! My question now will be 24-70 f/2.8 or 24-105 f/4

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

You got it. Glad it was helpful. Is it gonna be your first lens or will it be an addition to your already existing line up…

[@ak_hoops]

@@StevenSchulzPhoto 2nd technically. I have a Canon 50mm 1.8

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

It’s a great Allrounder. Question is will you need the extra focal length range 70-105. And are you ok with not giving up the aperture of 2.8 for 4… for me I chose the 24 to 70 because I have a 16 to 35 mm and also a 70 to 200 mm so it was easy for me to decide. Yes I need a 24 to 70 to fill the gap.

[@ak_hoops]

@@StevenSchulzPhoto really great point. It is rare that I need that range. And if I really want to I have a old 75-300mm but that’s not my focus. So 24-70 might be the best option! Thank you

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

👌🏻

[@renderfarmr]

What adapter are you using on the Canon to get from EF to RF?

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

The original one from canon. Worked great for me so far:

[@erasmogonzales7428]

i have this lens, its great but! the twist on lens cover doesnt stay put it moves and falls off.

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

Interesting… haven’t had that happen yet. Gotta pay closer attention to that 🤔

[@VisualControlRoom]

I need some advice if you can help. I have a canon efs mount, rebel t7. What adapter would I need to use the sigma 24mm?

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

As far as I know, you don’t need any adapter to put that lens on your rebel T7 body. Now I could be wrong, but I am pretty sure it will work without an adapter.

[@alvinkeyes1587]

This is 10 months later. LOL!!! So, yes you can use an EF lens on a crop-sensored (EFS mount) Canon. It works like a charm. Unfortunately, you cannot switch in the opposite direction. That is, Canon lenses designed for the EFS mount will only work on that mount. As a matter of fact, because the EFS mount protrudes into the camera, it will damage a full-frame camera. I bet you know this by now. But, I feel so happy that I actually have knowledge on this topic and can share it with you. LOL. Happy shooting!!!!

[@gsanchez922]

I'm thinking about selling my sigma 28mm f1.4 and 40mm f1.4 and get the sigma 24-70mm f2.8. Most of the time I shoot on f2.8 and to f8

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

Definitely worth considering. I personally love the versatility of the 24-70 and don’t mind that I may sacrifice on some slight sharpness. And to be honest the 24-70 definitely is still really sharp. The only downside I see for this lens is it’s weight. It is definitely on the heavier side.

[@gsanchez922]

@Steven Schulz I have the R5 and I feel that the camera have way too much details so a lil less sharp image is not a problem for me and my customers may not even notice it.

[@stevocanuck]

people say this is a versatile lens but 70mm does not seem like its enoigh for telephoto images/video?

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

For telephoto shots probably not. A 70 to 200 mm would be better for that for sure. I do use that focal length a lot for video and photo because I can go wide enough and tight enough for the most part. 🤷🏼‍♂️

[@slavafast]

Heyho :) Thank you for a great video and content in general :) Sorry, if my question will sound strange to you, but right now I'm thinking of a good versatile video lens for my canon r6. I'm a bit confused and don't know what is better option between canon EF 24-70 f4 IS and this sigma f2.8 lens. Maybe you have some thoughts on this topic? :) I know that there is no perfect lens, but still a bit stuck :D

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

So the Canon F4 version definitely is a little bit lighter. What you give up with that is the aperture which can be a big deal depending on what you’re going to use it for. the Sigma 24 to 70 F2. Eight is a great lens. Auto focus works fine as well. The only downside I see on that lens is that it is pretty heavy, but it does also have stabilization and a MF/AF switch. Me personally if I would have to decide between the EF 24 to 70 f4 and the Sigma 24 to 70 F2.8 I definitely would choose the sigma. but that’s just me. I hope that helped. 🤷🏼‍♂️ if you have any specific questions, let me know.

[@slavafast]

@@StevenSchulzPhoto Wow, that was pretty fast 😄 Thank you so much for sharing and your answer, really appreciate that 🙌 And yeah, I'm also thinking that the only downside of sigma could be a weight (and maybe a bit price). Looking forward to sell my 85mm and buy a this versatile lens :D

[@slavafast]

@@StevenSchulzPhoto Oh, I got a specific question :D Have you used this lens with a gimbal? I have DJI RSC2 and not sure if it would be able to handle such heavy lens 😅

[@chrisjenkins4894]

@@slavafastI noticed this comment was a year ago. Were you able to get this question answered? I have a RSC 2 also lol, I’m wondering if it supports this weight.

[@crisJnoni_9]

Hello, would the 17-70 2.8 have the same quality?

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

So this lens is part of Sigmas contemporary series and will not have Sigma‘s best glass. Also, it’s part of their ASPC sensor lineup. It definitely is smaller and lighter. When it comes to the aperture of 2.8 if you converted to full frame it would be a F4. I would say definitely very versatile, and can definitely get you some good results. Unfortunately, I do not have any experience with that specific lens.

[@WarThunderGerald]

ummm . what lens does he keep holding.. that looks very short and wide with more grip rings than the ONE THE VIDEO IS ABOUT!? anyone find that a TAD ANNOYING!? I mean i actually like the way that lens looks better but have no idea what it is! You think he'd.. SHOW THE LEND the video is about! Made me excited for a second since i just ordered one thinking wow it looks really wide and stubby (Something i like the look of - e.g. Sigma 85mm F1.4 would be a good example of the l;ook of a lense i like and one day want to also own) ...

[@rubenmartinez2543]

Super helpful brother! Listening to this as I'm on my way to pick mine up! 🤙🤙🤙

[@drecool6976]

Where can i buy this at a decent price for my 80D?

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

That’s a good question. I would look local on fb marketplace maybe or anywhere online used.

[@khalidalkaabi5506]

thanks Mr. Steven

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

Hey, I’m glad you liked it. Thanks for checking it out.

[@michaelsmith-qp8fe]

I have one and love it

[@jayk502]

Thank you for this video… I am looking at the following lens. Is this the same lens you’re speaking of? Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 IF EX DG HSM AF Lens -Nikon- (82mm)

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

You are very welcome! It is yeah. Mine is for the canon mount but other than that it’s the same lens.

[@jayk502]

@@StevenSchulzPhoto thank you!!

[@eM4rio]

I fel asleep while listening to you... really man, plus there is to much bass in your voice.

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

Hey at least you got a good nap out of it. Maybe you are in a better mood now! 👍🏻

[@Aroundtheworld-ew6rx]

The lens is just too heavy to carry around. Tamron 28-75mm is a great lens that's about a lb lighter.

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

It is definitely on the heavy side when you compare it to the tamron. For sure! It’s kinda like combining my workout with photography;)

[@Aroundtheworld-ew6rx]

@@StevenSchulzPhoto 😅

[@anonym5510]

Sigma makes the tiny 28-70 2.8 as well. Even smaller and lighter than the tamron

[@Aroundtheworld-ew6rx]

@@anonym5510 True but you get an extra 5mm with Tamron.

[@anonym5510]

@@Aroundtheworld-ew6rx True but less weight, and Sigma bokeh 😍

[@richardsanches11]

Samsung galaxy 23 200 megapixseles

[@timomuursepp3283]

While its a workhorse its also the most boring lens imo :D

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

It’s true. Interestingly enough I am find myself adding it to my rotation again and kicking it out again and adding it again and and and lol

[@timomuursepp3283]

@@StevenSchulzPhoto Haha :D Yeah same here, if I'm creating my own projects Im always using prime lenses but if its a job where I need to run around then this lens is a must!

[@rattoh]

like most 2.8 zooms. They're all about convivence. This however, has decent rendering.

[@StevenSchulzPhoto]

@@rattoh the only downside I found about this lens is that is pretty heavy compared to other 24-70s