Sigma 35mm f/1.2 Review VS Sony 35mm f/1.8

[@NOlimitsON]

What do you think of the Sigma 35mm f1.2? #sigma35mm #sigma35mmf12 #sigma35mmf12review

[@Bo_Hazem]

35mm + 50mm GM + 85mm all f1.2 would be a dream trinity to me. Combined with A7SIII means I'll do more moonlight content.

[@Cestariarts]

I own this lens. It's perfect. Never miss the focus. Maybe you did not update the firmware and that's why you're having problems

[@NOlimitsON]

It was the latest firmware)

[@radensyaficko2674]

I tested sigma 35mm f1.2. Its too heavy and dumb big for me which is not practical for long day shoot but thanks for your effort to review!

[@NOlimitsON]

😎👌🏻

[@juancisneros725]

You cleared everything I wanted to know, thanks a ton! I loved the video!

[@NOlimitsON]

I'm glad you did! Thank you!

[@Arri.]

35mm1.8 Sony is just clear winner 🏆 for me anyway. Thank you for this amazing comparison 👏

[@NOlimitsON]

Thank bro) stay tuned))

[@SnowBran]

I appreciate your time and effort making this for us.

[@NOlimitsON]

Thanks bro! Stay tuned)

[@recfilm1883]

Amazing lens. Exceptional quality but Sigma is chasing Sony when it comes to lens prices. For the price of this lens you can buy a decent (used) car in Poland.

[@Kliffot]

Pfff... it's like comparing a truck and a car, sure they can both be used on a road but their purpose is completely different. Maybe some people need that kind of video to realise, alright.

[@sattaraltekreeti4036]

I do have the sigma f/1.2 35mm using it on a7r iii, thought pics would be amazing with that lens :(

[@ifeanyiisitor7929]

Do you prefer the Sony 35mm f1.8 to the Sony 35mm f1.5 GM? I love your work by the way 👌

[@NOlimitsON]

Welcome mate) I’d say I prefer f1.8 because of the price and lack of focus breathing) stay tuned!

[@obscurelines]

I still want it for stills.

[@Zの黙示録]

It costs 580 bucks for a second hand 35mm f1.2 here in Japan, is it true that this specific lens is way more expensive outside Japan? Considering the price difference, should I get one over other options?

[@NOlimitsON]

If you are able to get the Sigma 35mm f1.2 for 580 bucks in good conditions - it’s totally worth it

[@GeddesKing]

Every shoot I use it sigma f1.2 35mm

[@anujsharma-yv7yd]

What about sigma 35 mm dg dn latest f1.4 How’s that ?

[@NOlimitsON]

I heard a lot of disappointing comments on it… never tested it myself though

[@liamriley9816]

Soft towards the edge of the frame.

[@ZoranOreskovic]

0:48 This doesn't look like a Sony A7SIII to me, it looks more like a Sony A7c to me.

[@NOlimitsON]

Because it’s shot in S-Cinetone which I don’t really like, but I had to use it, because my clients wanted a baked-in look

[@ZoranOreskovic]

@@NOlimitsON So when you shoot in S-Cinetone, the Sony A7SIII transforms into the body of the Sony A7c 🤣

[@NOlimitsON]

@@ZoranOreskovic oh, I got you) This was the Sony a6300 - I just had to use a7s3 to shoot this)

[@MelvinDlaCruz]

i have the 1.4 and is amazing, I prefeet the 1.4 over the 1.2, is way better

[@dannyli9424]

I am no fan of Sony 35 1.8 and carry my sigma 35 1.2 everywhere. I even adapt it on my Z9 with adapter. The Sony has pretty ugly Bokeh and that's one main reason i sold mine and never look back.

[@NOlimitsON]

If you’re ok about the weight and slow af - why not)

[@jeffcornelius544]

Dude. You’re Trying to compare a F1.2 with a shitty little f1.8!!!????

[@NOlimitsON]

Sure, why not? I think many people are considering a 35mm lens, but don’t actually need f1.2 and this big weight, that’s why I’m comparing it. And 35 f1.8 is a great lens for the money

[@florian2927]

Exactly. Not sure why this guy is being aggressive. Choosing a lens is a function of money and compromises you’re willing to accept. Thanks for the review, super helpful!

[@stevenlochner7995]

I mean hes not wrong a 1.2 vs 1.8 is not a realistic comparison a person who is looking at a 1.2 is looking for that fast glass , obliterated background. Probably would be better to compare the sony 1.4