Zapruder And Stolley: Witness to an Assassination

[@Jasona1976]

Stolley defends Time's SUPPRESSION of the film as if it was a noble act. What BS.

[@banking-cartelmedia-cartel7206]

@TermsofService you are sayanim

[@banking-cartelmedia-cartel7206]

@TermsofService mossad and American sayanim played a role in jfk coup and cover-up

[@banking-cartelmedia-cartel7206]

@TermsofService I can write a book on it.

[@banking-cartelmedia-cartel7206]

@TermsofService it will start out Rubinstein was Mishpucka and will end calling for massive banking reform in order to defeat the white supremacist banking cartel that protected Rubinstein and his confederates.

[@banking-cartelmedia-cartel7206]

@TermsofService same old psychotic anti-semitic cries of foul play!! White supremacy is banking supremacy. The truth is not anti-anything and the banking cartel cant deny any free man of our god-given free speech rights. The Mossad played big role in the JFK coup over JFKs opposition to Israel building an A-bomb. And then American sayanim covered for the Mossad. I know LBJ, Hoover, Angleton, Nicolletti, and others were involved but the cover-up was to protect the Mossad role

[@paulaharrisbaca4851]

It’s hard for people now to imagine how something like the Zapruder film was looked at. Honestly. When Robert Groden leaked it on TV to that jerk in the 1970’s, I was so shocked I burst into tears. And it’s obsessed me ever since.

[@bobma6342]

I saw it on that episode. I remember the audience gasping after the head shot.

[@paulaharrisbaca4851]

Some things just never go away. And these days people have seen so much they simply cannot imagine it. It was more shocking than 9/11 in a way. 9/11 seemed more like a fantasy. If you lived in New York, that's a whole different thing. But seeing a human being's head explode when that was an unusual thing... Wow. Never forgot it. @@bobma6342 Actually, watching the people leaping from the Towers was similar in a way. It was too real. Fellow Americans.

[@arricammarques1955]

It helped remind America that justice was robbed from them.

[@johnbellingham9067]

And you only saw the censored altered version. Did you ever wonder why you could not see the brains and skull matter on the limousine trunk that Jackie Kennedy crawled out to retrieve from 6 feet behind JFK ? To travel that far behind meant that the shot came from the front right above.

[@johnbellingham9067]

Nobody asked if the film was altered after the first viewing

[@323v6]

John Bellingham apparently there are 2-3 original copies, as it was copied before the tampering?

[@stddisclaimer8020]

@@323v6 The Zapruder film was not "tampered with." Conspiratards just need that to be true because the film shows exactly what happened, and what happened does not suggest conspiracy.

[@ENDTIMEsVideoLibrary]

@@stddisclaimer8020 Okay Mr. or Misses Troll.. time for your Coffee Break!!

[@PeasGraveny]

Conspiritards?You are the one who believes in magic bullets

[@johnbellingham9067]

@@stddisclaimer8020 Hi there Std Deviation are you still doing the same troll job for the CIA? In Japan you would be called a "window man" . - A man who is given a lowly job and just sits and looks out of the window all day.

[@ligayabarlow5077]

Founded the decadent celebrity rag "People Magazine." Wow.

[@drumdad54sdl47]

As far as I'm concerned, that's not much to brag about. Like I give a rat's arse about celebrities..

[@paulvella5744]

Win Win Win for Everyone! What a joke! If the 6rh Floo Museum owns the copyr;that’s to Zapruder Fill, then why don’t they show the entire Zapruder film in the museum that shows the fatal shot coming from the front. I went to the Museum and was appalled that they edited out the fatal show that shows JFK head going back! I was even approached by someone while I videotaped their edited version of Zapruder and was told “Escuse me sir, you are not allowed to tape because of copyrights”… Well, too late. I got the video and am really disgusted that the Museum conceals the facts by not showing the Zapruder film entirely, nor do they sell any books in the store that contradicts the lone gunman theory. What a crime after the fact…

[@wxdude1964]

The sad thing about the 6th floor museum is they're all in on Oswald alone. They don't want to hear anything about a conspiracy.

[@johncooper7663]

That's because the conspiracy kooks have 47 different versions and all of them are very unhinged.

[@darrenmccarthy3346]

So true 😥

[@jb-vb8un]

59 YEARS OF FACTS & EVIDENCE = OSWALD, the two greatest shots since G WASHINGTON had two horses shot out from under him

[@leilaniaileenlove]

Exactly

[@TheSilvergold45]

Too bad Mr.Z stopped filming when the motorcade when under the underpass because if he would have panned his camera to the right a little more and kept filming he might have caught and filmed assassins behind the picket fence with their rifles. To bad..

[@doriwebb2515]

Well, the Bell film showed the area to the right of the underpass/overpass immediately after the limousine passed below and no "assassins" can be seen. That's because there was no "other assassins".

[@jehovahuponyou]

@@doriwebb2515 DEAREST DOREE THE EXPLOREE, WHAT JEFF IS SAYING IS THAT ZAPRUDER COULD SEE "*BEHIND"* THE PICKETT FENCE - BELL COULD *"NOT"* SEE BEHIND THE PICKETT FENCE - YOU NEED MORE TIME TO EXPLORE - THANK YOU!!!!!!!

[@doriwebb2515]

@@jehovahuponyou No, what Jeff is saying is if Abe continued to pan to the right after the limousine left the Plaza, whoever might have been behind the fence would be on film. No, Abe and Marilyn could not see what was behind the fence. There were shrubs and trees between him and his view behind the fence. The plinth on which they stood is slightly lower than the concrete walls on either wide of the steps leading to the parking area. There is a continuing 5' fence at a 105 degree angle from the fence that runs parallel to Elm St., well past where Abe or Marilyn could see behind the fence. Look at a survey map of Dealey Plaza and do some serious exploring yourself. BTW, cute with the all caps. Also, Lee Bowers told us exactly what he saw behind the fence from his 2nd story railroad switching control tower. You might explore his observations, too. You are welcome.

[@jehovahuponyou]

@@doriwebb2515 DEAREST DOREE THE DARLING DELUDED EXPLORARY *NOT* , *#1 - Mr. ZAPRUDER DID PAN RIGHT, FOLLOWING THE PRESIDENTIAL LIMO UNTIL IT COMPLETELY DIDAPPEARED UNDER THE TRIPLE DIPLE UNDERPASS, AND THE FENCE IS IN VERY PLAIN VIEW FROM FRAME 447 TO FRAME 486 (STARTING WITH THE SOUTH/EAST CORNER BACK TO THE TREE)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!* #2 - THERE WERE BUSHES, *BUT* ONE CAN SEE UNDER THEM FAIRLY EASILY, EVEN TO THE POINT OF HAVING CAPTURED AN IMAGE BEHIND THE FENCE IF Mr. ZAPRUDER WOULD HAVE LEFT HIS CAMERA ON AND CONTINUED TO PAN RIGHT!!!!!!!!! #3 - THE CONCRETE WALLS ARE *NOT* SO HIGH AS Mr. ZAPRUDER COULD NOT SEE OVER THEM - HE COULD PLAINLY SEE THE PICKETTE FENCE AND EVEN BEHIND IT A BIT IF HE WOULD HAVE LEFT HIS CAMERA ON AND CONTINUED TO PAN TO THE RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! #4 - LEE BOWERS WAS AN UNWILLING WITNESS AT BEST, BECAUSE HE WAS SCARED TO DEATH, AND THEN WAS IN FACT KILLED HIMSELF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! #5 - I JOINED KZbin MANY YEARS AGO - I STARTED TYPEING IN CAPS THEN AND WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO - *SO* PAY ATTENTION TO THE CONTENT OF MY POSTS AND LEAVE MY FORMATTING TO ME - THANKING YOU I AM NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOOK, EITHER YOU ARE A LIAR OR JUST A LIL MISS KNOW IT ALL WHO IN REALITY KNOWS VERY LITTLE - EITHER WAY YOU SHOULD HAVE NOT MADE YOUR LAST POST - I HAVE A FRAME BY FRAME COPY OF THE Z FILM AND I CAN SEE VERY EASILY THAT JEFF WAS RIGHT - SO PLEASE GO AWAY AND EXPLORE SOME MORE, MAYBE IN ABOUT FIFTY YEARS YOU MIGHT KNOW HALF AS MUCH AS I NOW KNOW ABOUT THE MURDER OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY - MONKEY DOO SAID "HI DEE DO DO!!!!!!!!" - MONKEY BOO WITHHELD ALL COMMETS, HOWEVER HE DID SHAKE HIS HEAD AFTER READING WHAT YOU WRIT - ;^)

[@louf7178]

It's interesting Zap doesn't mention hearing shots to his immediate right. Nor is any smoke pictured (if it was in range.)

[@bouznouz]

Gary was in the side of conspiracy theoristes than he completly changed his mind to be the curator of the six f m. now he's gone (in 2015) leaving nothing to remember him. R.I.P

[@ENDTIMEsVideoLibrary]

The Official Story is tin Truth the Official Lie.. That's the point..

[@stddisclaimer8020]

@@ENDTIMEsVideoLibrary There is no official "story" (that you can attack), there's only the truth of Oswald-alone, as established across mutiple major investigations (which cannot be challenged).

[@ENDTIMEsVideoLibrary]

​@@stddisclaimer8020 This is one of the ways that I've confirmed that you are a Troll. I've read your comments on so many of these JFK Comment Sections and noticed that you play Both Sides of the Fence.. Interestingly enough, just like Oswald did! Oswald did it as a CIA Agent who also worked for the FBI.. You are Sooo Busted! And that's why you're in my Troll File..

[@stddisclaimer8020]

@@ENDTIMEsVideoLibrary We don't need to confirm you're a troll, for every lamebrain comment you write positively reeks of that word. Who else but a troll would keep on recycling zombie lies like Oswald being a government agent? Yes, a conspiracy troll like yourself desperately NEEDS LHO to be CIA or FBI. But you can't have it, because it never was....

[@ENDTIMEsVideoLibrary]

​@@stddisclaimer8020 Just for the record, I've been putting up verifiable Content with Proof of what I say on my KZbin Site for many years, whereas you have NOTHING on your site.. Absolutely nothing!! You speak out of both sides of your mouth on these Comment Sections both Pro Conspiracy and Anti-Conspiracy very Blatantly.. YOU are a Troll and that's verifiable.. You will reap what you sow..

[@paulaharrisbaca4851]

Btw, didn’t the American 🇺🇸 people deserve the right to see the film????? Bootlegged or not? It shouldn’t be about Time magazine owning the “rights” or not. And even if they owned the rights, who gave them the rights to strangely cut out about 5 frames with no explanation when JFK went behind the Stemmons Freeway sign? Anyone who has used an 8 mm camera knows that that kind of edit only happens when you stop the film and flip it over in the dark! And that wasn’t possible as anyone can see. Something was intentionally cut out or was used as a way to change the timing or the images.

[@jimmycricket5366]

It's horrific. It should be released by a you know there's a good reason why they don't want the information released even after a whole generation and a half has moved on. Allen Dulles, Edgar Hoover and LBJ were pure evil.

[@shernitadee]

The American people had to wait 13 years to see it!

[@jerrilampon9596]

Life Magazine agreed not to show the film or any part of the film of the third shot that hit JFK in the head. It's a contract and any deviation from that agreement put Life Magazine in peril of breech of contract. In that case, the "American people" don't have any right to violate the contract between Zapruder and Life Magazine. Four and a half frames (Z-208 -209 -210 -211 and -212 frames were damaged in the original film just before JFK goes behind the Stemmons sign for about 1 second. Those frames were replaced by same day film copies in the film we see today. We know they are copies because there are no images in the sprocket holes. Nothing was cut out. If Abe had turned the film canister over and began reshooting, the limousine would have been gone by that time.

[@rmhouser19861]

@@jerrilampon9596 Exactly what Jerril said... so tired of people feeding conspiracy by stating factually wrong things

[@haroldwebster4710]

@@rmhouser19861 What exactly was wrong with what Jerril said?

[@Jay-vr9ir]

LBJ dies and not too long after ,The Zapruder Film is finally shown , on television HMMM???????

[@jerrilampon9596]

Yes, LBJ died of a heart attack in 1973, ten years after the assassination. Geraldo showed the film in 1975. MMMMMMM, what?

[@peapod8]

Dan Rather's initial description of the assassination as shown in the Zapruder movie was deceptively incorrect, and Rather has yet to acknowledge this or ask the world forgiveness. And no one saw the film--which now since is probably doctored--until Geraldo showed it on his show. This guy Stolley is as disingenuous as Rather, both part of the 50+year coverup of the truth.

[@TonyWud]

yeah. Geraldo is soooo credible.

[@MrDuds1984]

That is nonsense, Rather had one look at the film and one only before rushing out to get back to the studio to broadcast what he had seen so he had to do it all from quick memory. He was not being deceptive and with that he told it three times and the second time CBS told him to leave out the part about Jackie climbing on the back of the car

[@ligayabarlow5077]

I saw it four years before Geraldo

[@daviddreyer5817]

Dan Rather replaced Walter Chronkite as CBS anchor. Bob Shiefer became CBS anchor too. Robert McNiel was working for a newswire service in Dealey Plaza Mc Niel join PBS Newshour with Jim Lehrer who worked for Dalas Morning News.

[@daviddreyer5817]

He did not tell that Time Life paid Zapruder initially $50,000 for it, then bought it back for $150,000. It was not seen for another 13 years when Geraldo Riviera showed it late at night. Then TV hey sold it back to Zapruder for a hundred pennies. He sold it to the Federal Government with $16,000,000 of your tax dollars to be stored in a vault at the National Archives.

[@dansullivan8648]

It doesn't make one bit of difference who ended up with the film because no matter what evidence, facts and truth are presented, there is a faction of the population that refuses to base their opinions and beliefs on the truth and they will continue to cry and bitch forever. Those people have zero credibility.

[@jerrilampon9596]

Truth is apparently irrelevant for those who wish to ignore the facts. That's especially true today, unfortunately.

[@kayejeyeracer]

This guy is RIDICULOUS....

[@Realbillball]

Yeah, silly man who says things that doesn't fit in your world view so you respond with name calling. Yeah, HE is the ridiculous one.

[@kayejeyeracer]

yep "HE" sure is..."GLAD"..You Agree"!

[@mikewynne7131]

Zapruder sounds like a hypocritical and conflicted man. He didn’t want the film to be “exploited” yet he sold it for the equivalent of 1.3 million dollars and periodically check with Time to see if he’d earned royalties.

[@doriwebb2515]

And yet, it wasn't exploited until Mark Lane and Jim Garrison stole the film loaned to them by Life Magazine and made copies completely contrary to their agreement with Life. Of course, this wasn't the first time the duo stole but were never prosecuted.

[@insertnamehere313]

@@doriwebb2515 with respect you clearly haven't done you're homework to get you're REAL answer. Garrison didn't exploit the film He was exploiting the truth and wanted justice for our assassinated president like most other Americans but the government is the ones who altered it then tryed to sell it to the American people.

[@doriwebb2515]

@@insertnamehere313 I've done more than 45 years of research, with respect. There is no alternation of the film. If you truly believe that, explain how every frame of every film from that day are the same, the original Zapruder film and three same day copies. Garrison was a pathological liar, a bully, and should have been disbarred decades before.

[@louf7178]

@@doriwebb2515 Thanks for that mention. I only recently have watched about this event and read _all_ the conflicting remarks (across the board). In my current belief, I thought it looked authentic. I can only take what the processed clips found as true, trusting the years of people's work and watchful commenters. I at first, I thought the shot surely must be from the front/right, but after slowing and zooming edits, I can see the initial forward motion, along with the fragments, and this was also seen in the Nix film. (Along with the car *not* stopping.) One concern of mine of current comment volume is: the only ones writing may be saturating the comments with wrong opinions, thus misinforming new readers.

[@jerrilampon9596]

He didn't want the images to be exploited. Life Magazine is the one making the monetary offers to Zapruder, he wasn't demanding it and was often checking with Life if they were conforming to their agreement. That's not Abe being exploitive.

[@utoobjunkie4902]

Correction : “ It says something about American Journalism”->BACK THEN ! Not now !

[@shawnwhite2120]

Did anyone watch Oliver stones JFK through the glass from last year with more evidence pretty intriguing

[@kdub9918]

Is the sixth floor museum completely against all conspiracy theories/ideas?

[@SixthFloorMuseum]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/o6LVaZacdrmqr9E

[@rogerscottcathey]

Like Wecht wasn't an idiot, which he was. He had some good points, but in the end he sold out.

[@paulvella5744]

Most important fact. The decision for Life to purchase was made by CD Jackason, a CIA connected person…The deal was signed by CD Jackson, who was tied with CIA… That says it all…

[@dolnick7]

Sure, because the number one news magazine in the country wouldn't be interested in a movie of the assassination unless the CIA was involved.

[@willcollins6956]

@@dolnick7 Right! The CIA produces so many famous assassination movies, don't they? Maybe you are thinking of Oliver Stone's "JFK"?

[@dolnick7]

@@willcollins6956 Actually I was being sarcastic. LOL The Zapruder film was hot news, and the leading news organizations of the day were beating down Zapruder's door trying to obtain it. Thinking that the CIA was fueling this interest strikes me as rather daft. I also fail to see why the CIA would benefit from promoting a film like JFK, that blames the CIA among others for the assassination.

[@davidarbuckle7236]

They screwed up the film. And then they made excuses. Thankfully not enough to prevent the proof there was more than one shooter.

[@willcollins6956]

OH! You have "proof" there was more than one shooter? Please share that with the gathering, please?

[@davidarbuckle7236]

@@willcollins6956, There was always proof of more than one shooter. That was entirely the issue. The head moving violently backward, the missing brain, and the fake Autopsy with the completely inexperienced Forensic pathologists burning his notes was the first clue. But with over a dozen witnesses who saw smoke including one of the Secret Service agents, and several who smelled gunpowder, not to mention the sequence of shots. Most of the witnesses stated that the shots came in an odd sequence. Bang.....bang bang. (Journalists and even John Connally) Impossible for a bolt action rifle from one gun. Once you realize that the Warren Report's mission was to cover up a conspiracy, it all comes together rather nicely. As Warren and Hoover said, they were worried about WWIII. (which was total nonsense)

[@arricammarques1955]

@@willcollins6956 The trauma room doctors at Parkland share to eyewitness accounts. JFK autopsy was altered at Bethesda. This was a coup d'etat at the highest levels.

[@yemred5854]

I was originally of the opinion for many years of a possible conspiracy. Now I am certain without doubt that Oswald was the lone assassin . Carrying a parcel of “ Curtain Rods” actual weapon with him in a work colleague car to work . The same parcel wrapping found by the snipers nest , His actions after the the event is a man of guilt , leaving the building , catching a bus , shooting officer Tippit clearly witnessed by at least 3 people . Then attempting to hide in a cinema , when arrested by police officers resisted arrest and pulled a gun out, the same gun that killed Tippit . He was no patsy , he was a callous killer ,an angry young man that was unhappy with the world and the quality of life he was experiencing. He was struggling to make ends meet, having serious economic issues that was ruining his marriage. He was an excellent marksman trained In the marines , do not believe the bullshit of conspiracy theories as a hopeless shooter .

[@mach1gtx150]

You're wrong on all counts. You need to do a Lot more research.

[@PANCHOVILLAMATO]

I was originally of the opinion for many years that LHO, as my gov't told me, had acted alone... A man worth nothing, killing the man worth everything, etc etc... Then as I got older the stories I heard and read didn't make sense.... I started to do my own research... The more I read, the more I became convinced of LHO' s innocence. Today, I know beyond a shadow of a doubt, that LHO didn't fire that rifle that day. The HSCA revealed that boxes around the sniper's window were rearranged AFTER the last shot. The rifle clip should have been found on the floor, as it auto ejects after the last bullet is loaded. The clip is shown to be in the rifle. LHO failed a paraffin test, proving he did NOT fire a rifle that day. A middle aged man, with terrible Russian impersonated LHO in Mexico City. The FBI agents at the autopsy said the back wound could NOT possibly have exited the throat. The doctors lied on the autopsy report to hide the truth. The DPD initially said the rifle was a Mauser, a German made rifle.. every rifle imported is required to have the country of origin stamped on the barrel. LHO's Carcano read 6.5 Made Italy Turin... How could any cop mistake a rifle made in Italy for a German Mauser? LHO was framed.... He was nothing but a patsy!

[@yemred5854]

@@PANCHOVILLAMATO He was not framed. He was not a patsy . The rifle was initially thought during the chaos to be a Mauser by a policeman at the scene, but he genuinely was wrong , it was a genuine mistake and was soon corrected as a carcano. Oswald was 100% the assassin. This conspiracy nonsense needs to stop. After all these years something would have surfaced. There was nobody behind the fence on the Grassy knoll . A police officer within seconds after the assassination ran up to that area and found Nothing! . No car , no human , no cartridges , Zero!

[@PANCHOVILLAMATO]

@@yemred5854 From a distance a Mauser & Carcano bear a striking resemblance.... If you were a military vet from WWII or had tons of police experience you might be able to tell the difference from a distance... BUT when you get up close, the resemblance stops. All imported rifles are required to have the country of origin stamped on the barrel. LHO's Carcano reads 6.65 Made Italy Turin.... So if you were the cop that from a distance initially thot this was a Mauser...made in Germany or Argentina, that thot would be dissolved in a heartbeat upon seeing "Made Italy".... So why did the DPD reports read "Mauser" ?? And while I'm on the clock.... In the first set of pictures, I don't see the clip but later, out on the street, I can clearly see the clip in the rifle.... We know the clip auto ejects after loading the last round. So the clip should have been found on the 6th floor by the spent shells... It doesn't appear in any of the pictures. What kind of dumb cop would pick up the clip and reinsert it without checking for fingerprints first? If the claim is that LHO picked it up, then why didn't he police his brass as well?

[@jdunn101ify]

@@yemred5854 oh grow up....loads of actual witnesses heard shots from grassy knoll and even saw a puff of gunsmoke from there. The Warren commission excluded any witnesses that didn't fit their pre decided lone nut theory.

[@carydavidhoffson6014]

The killer was working together with zapper to stand in back of him so know one would see what was going on in the back of him were the shots were coming from

[@darinpetty3741]

Can you say conspiracy?

[@doriwebb2515]

No conspiracy but it's obvious you've never been to the Sixth Floor Museum to view their documents and archives. And what's all this about the 7th floor?

[@darinpetty3741]

@@doriwebb2515 your obviously a moron I'm writing a book to prove my shit!

[@willcollins6956]

@@darinpetty3741 Please let us all now when your book comes out!!

[@ATLcentury334]

Almost $1.5 M.

[@dragginboy11]

Garrison was a nut? No credible responses to Garrison's accusations and finds. Maybe Garrison killed Ferrie! This guy Stolley is proud they never showed this travisty of a film. Clearly they needed to give the FBI and or CIA time to alter it.

[@stddisclaimer8020]

@J Russo: Accusations, especially the wild ones Garrison made, do not deserve "credible responses." But, while we're in the response dpt., here's one: A jury dismissing Garrison and his foolish case against Clay Shaw in less than an hour.

[@KAHOOSIER]

Thanks for bringing that up, I was offended by that. This guy had a different agenda than exposing the truth. What news organization has the greatest video ever and doesn’t show it, nobody! They were hiding it and not because it was gross and his bash on Garrison proves it.

[@KAHOOSIER]

@@stddisclaimer8020 I got into this nearly two years ago when Covid shut everything down. I’ve read and watched everything that I can find. I’m always questioning my objectively and making sure that I stay away from confirmation bias. You follow the evidence and then have to use common sense. And I’m telling you without any question in my mind…Garrison had it. More than anyone else, he had it 100%. He figured it out and had them with overwhelming evidence. I’ve also found that anyone taking using your argument is either incompetent or has some other agenda. Not even a debate pal, even if you won’t step outside of your ego, the government will eventually release the rest and you’ll see then.

[@stddisclaimer8020]

@@KAHOOSIER Note: Garrison followed only the "evidence" that seemed to conform to his fervid delusions, which is why he got the wrong answer, and why the jury struck down his "case" against Shaw & Ferrie in just 54 minutes. No debate; Garrison had no case at all. Don't let your conspiracy-slanted ego get in the way of the established facts.

[@KAHOOSIER]

@@stddisclaimer8020 Note: Garrison pushed for a pre-trial panel of three judges to decide if he had probable cause to arrest Clay Shaw for conspiracy to murder JFK. He put forth 4 witnesses alone and they unanimously agreed that Garrison was correct. Conspiracy-slanted ego, that doesn’t even make sense but nice try. This conspiracy turns out to be true with an overwhelming majority of people in the US & the world that feel the same way. It’s you Mr. STD that is out of the consensus, which by definition is a conspiracy theory. Which is also defined as something less probable, it seems to me that you are rather uneducated on the topic. The US Attorney General, personally brought a case against Garrison for taking bribes regarding pinball machines. US Attorney Generals are known for doing this against District Attorney’s that don’t know what they’re doing. Because you felt the need to be rude and disrespectful I should be above that and turn the other cheek. However, I cannot blame you for your ignorance but it is “ego-driven” that drives you to enter conversations that your ill-equipped to enter into. Maybe you really have a need to be heard and your lonely, that may explain your indignant attitude towards others. This is unfortunate but common in today’s society. Maybe you should pick up a hobby, some examples used by adults with mental disabilities are gardening, bowling or bird watching. Have a good rest of your day and if it burns while urinating, go to the doctor. They have shots that will clear that right up, thanks for playing. 😉

[@davidgoetz2576]

The Zapruder film is the most scrutinized piece of film in history. Any alteration to the film would have been noticed by someone. And how would they have known at the outset that there wasn't other film out there? Or did the Gov't magically alter all the video taken in Dealey Plaza? Wouldn't it have been a lot easier for the conspirators to have their second gunman fire from the same general direction as the Book Depository than to have to run around in the immediate aftermath of the shooting and track down and surreptitiously alter multiple privately-held films and somehow rig the autopsy and fake its photos and x-rays? If conspiracy theorists insist on a grassy knoll gunman, fine. But if he existed, his shot missed.

[@rogerscottcathey]

Not hardly. The most scrutinized film in history is the Patterson film of a Sasquatch. Don't make things up.

[@cynthiastorer1230]

Fits the composer and profitable very clever... wastes my time... idb.

[@johnsherman6718]

The Zapbruder thing is overwith.

[@PaulHenreid]

I hoped he would discuss the federal government's removal of frames depicting the aftermath of the fatal shot.

[@JimmyTheGreek2000]

It was C I A that paid $150,000 for the Z - film, Mr. Jackson the Editor of Time-Life was ex C I A. Both the C I A and the S S are both mentioned in this video !

[@stddisclaimer8020]

@jimmyTheGreek2000 Assuming the CIA bought the film, it was certainly not the in-camera original. Thus, if the CIA (according you and your ilk) altered it, it wouldn't matter, as it wouldn't match the original.

[@arricammarques1955]

@@stddisclaimer8020 The altered film has splice marks or edits. Its far from an original camera neg. copy.

[@stddisclaimer8020]

@@arricammarques1955 Your "altered film" may have "splice marks or edits" but the original in-camera Zapruder film does not.

[@stddisclaimer8020]

@JimmyTheGreek2000 During WWII (1943) C.D. Jackson joined the OSS (Office of Strategic Services). The OSS is *_not_* the CIA, which was created in 1947 by which time Jackson had moved into publishing, becoming Managing Director of Time-Life International. Thus Jackson had nothing to do with the CIA, which means the CIA had nothing to do with the purchase of the Zapruder film, as well as (it must be noted) nothing of do with the Kennedy assassination. You’re operating on the basis of a whole boatload of flawed assumptions

[@Joepacalypse1107]

Sad to see Stolley refer to Garrison as a lunatic. Thankfully, Geraldo aired this film that Stolley and Life had so irresponsibly kept from the public for so many years feeding so many conspiracy theories.

[@kayejeyeracer]

Gary "The Sell Out" Mack....

[@kayejeyeracer]

Agreed..Sounds like he was "Jack Ruby'd."

[@kayejeyeracer]

very interesting angle saint..witness protection? Anything is possible..probable..definitely

[@stephan6372]

First shot to the chest is seen clearly from the front. Then in all the confusion, the driver and co-driver turn as he slows the car holding a gun as he(the driver) shoots and quickly turns facing front and drives fast. You can clearly see him turn with the gun and shoot while everyone in the car has there attention on JFK.

[@jb-vb8un]

"CLEARLY" fr6 the front ..... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[@531ff]

It always looks to me as the driver turns around and shoots

[@stephan6372]

@@531ff exactly.. Clear as daylight.

[@arricammarques1955]

@@stephan6372 This was an illusion of the poorly duped film. The digital restoration disproves this theory.

[@stephan6372]

@@arricammarques1955 the digital restoration has this cut scene.

[@paulmancini3363]

Zapruder was a plant by the conspiracy planners (CIA, Military Intelligence, etc) - The Film was Doctored to leave out many important things such as the number of shots,their angles and people movement, etc,etc and to fit the 1 Gunman Theory

[@willcollins6956]

If you truly believe the Zapruder film was altered in any way, you need to explain how, when, and by whom. When you work through the facts and film(s) paths, you'll understand how it was impossible any film was altered at any time.

[@paulmancini3363]

@@willcollins6956 film was doctored at the Kodak Facility in Rochester to support with the 1 Man Assassin Theory that the Gov’t wanted - Frames taking out, frames doctored just like the Autopsy Report was altered to again support a 1 Man Assassin Theory - that Limo was shot at by about 5-6 Different Shots by multiple Hit Squads

[@willcollins6956]

@@paulmancini3363 Zapruder took the original film and one of the three same day copies home with him in the late evening of 11/22/63. The original film was sent by courier to Life Magazine the morning of 11/23 where they began working on it for images in their next issue. The autopsy report was altered by whom? It looks like it was signed by all three pathologist who performed the autopsy. If any frames are removed from a motion picture film, the results would be obvious in the form of jump cuts, literally a jump forward of the continuous action. This isn't seen in any of the Zapruder film copies. Can you point to any physical or witnesses showing there were 5-6 different shots from different directions? I'd like to see what you have?

[@paulmancini3363]

@@willcollins6956 JFK shot in the Head, Throat and Back - Connolly shot in Shoulder, at least 2 Missed Shots (1 hit the street then hit a bystander near the Overpass , 1 shot hit curb and then borrowed into the ground on the grassy knoll also a shot thru the Windshield that came from the Front so about 6-7 Shots right there Pathologists altered Pics of the Autopsy and redid his Head/Skull to support being shot from behind to again support the 1 Assassin Theory

[@paulmancini3363]

@@willcollins6956 Life Magazine sent the Film to Kodak Special Division in Rochester NY at the behest of the FBI (Hoover)

[@darinpetty3741]

7th floor is a joke to America

[@shirleyfreeman7101]

No concrete evidence

[@KishaAmenio06x]

Too much cover up! We will never know!

[@melaniehofmeister8262]

Dick Stolley basks in his arrogant, autocratical attitude

[@mikeodonnell6799]

JFK? kids today don't care about that headless President, they be busy learning the new Jenna Ortega dance man

[@keithashley6298]

RIP Gary Mack,a fine man.

[@stevemaher7481]

Jim Garrison was no lunatic.

[@jimhickox5181]

@TermsofService Troll alert! Lol!

[@stddisclaimer8020]

@@jimhickox5181 LOL alert! Conspiratard on the loose!

[@ENDTIMEsVideoLibrary]

If someone who is prominent tells the Truth, they always call him or her crazy or a lunatic.. It's the way the CIA Slander's people up to steer the public away from knowing what really happened..

[@stddisclaimer8020]

@@ENDTIMEsVideoLibrary You seem to be saying that if you yourself were "prominent," the idiotic stuff you post would qualify you as crazy. I say you're crazy no matter your prominence level. Wake up. The CIA had nothing to do with the JFK assassination; there's no proof of it; and you can't wish it to be true.

[@ENDTIMEsVideoLibrary]

@@stddisclaimer8020 In your fantasies Mr Troll. In your fantasies.

[@davemojarra2666]

Thank jebus for Gerald Rivera. Censorship sucks.

[@Jay-vr9ir]

As I have mentioned it , the film was finally shown after LBJ died ??????

[@Eyewonder3210]

Bootleg copies are slightly out of focus on purpose. I've seen the original and it's so horrific that I involuntarily let out a scream and will never get it out of my mind. It's really up close detail.

[@jehovahuponyou]

NO, YOU NEVER SAW THE ORIGINAL, BECAUSE AFTER SUNDAY NIGHT THERE WERE NO MORE "ORIGINALS" LEFT - *AND* THE "ORIGINAL WAS THE SAME FORMAT AS THE "FAKES" THAT EXIST TODAY, THE ORIGINALS WERE NOT ANY MORE "UP CLOSE" THAN THE FAKES!!!!!!! MY PROOF THAT YOU NEVER SAW THE ORIGINAL, YOU ARE STILL HERE AREN'T YOU - CASE CLOSED!!!!!!!

[@jerrilampon9596]

@@jehovahuponyou Very few people saw the original film projected in front of them. After Life Magazine received the original (and one same day copy) they only showed single frames from the film. Your argument and "proof" are false.

[@jehovahuponyou]

@@jerrilampon9596 YOU ARE JUST ANOTHER WANNA BE EXPERT - IF ONE LOOKS YOU CAN FIND THE Z-FILM FRAME BY FRAME ON GOOGLE - THEN YOU COPY EACH FRAME ONTO YOUR COMPUTER THEN TRANSFER TO A CD, THAT WAY YOU CAN EXPLORE THE Z-FILM AT YOUR LEIZURE ANY TIME YOU WANT TO - DO SOME RESEARCH BEFORE YOU SMACK YOUR STUPID LIPS - I TIRE OF IDIOTS LIKE YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@jerrilampon9596]

@J Smithers Tapes? What tapes? We are discussing 8mm Kodachrome film. There are no tapes.

[@jerrilampon9596]

@J Smithers What is ridiculous about the truth? 'You have some explanation that is credible?

[@Soccerword]

They act like it would have been a crime to show the film in 1963. Wouldn't it be in the interest of truth to show America what happened? C. D. Jackson (former OSS agent) purchased the Z-film on behalf of Time/Life to "protect the integrity of the film"...that is, to ensure the film was kept from the American public. Why would they pay so much to acquire the film and then never show it?

[@JH-qy8no]

I saw it by accident when I was 8 years old. Would you want your 8 YEAR OLD to see that?

[@bobma6342]

@@JH-qy8no Parentel Discretion is Advised

[@7071t6]

WOW what a crock of shit, release all the IRS tax records of TIME LIFE & how many issues they sold due to jfk's killing & how much Zapruder really got paid & to think that the Zapruder Family still got 16 million dollars for a altered film that TIME LIFE took to the NPIC to be altered & then got the film back & never ever once did they show the film in a film format, except in the clay shaw trial, which is when the bootlegging started, so someone from time life made sure copies of the film got out & Robert Gorden would have known about that as he was selling ticket's in NEW YORK to see the film in underground viewing sessions, so both Groden & others have made a lot of $4 from the killing of jfk & not 1 cent went to the people that suffered the most like little John Kennedy, now if they had done that, then you would be remembered for ever, especially if Zapruder had done that, every cent went to Little John, think about it, even the $25,000 he said he was giving to the tippet family is suspect, otherwise shows us the TAX records of the Tippet family after his death ? Also more importantly all the IRS tax records of all those WC staff members needs to be opened up & any dallas police officers during the year before 11/22/1963, that way we can see if any police officer had extra cash for no good reason unless he/she won the lotto ?

[@kayejeyeracer]

you forgot one more tax record....OSWALD'S

[@kayejeyeracer]

i hope and wish and pray his daughter has one more copy of the real Zapruder Film so we can see the tampering...TRUTH

[@7071t6]

Kaye Jeye Well said. :) After all the copy that NARA have & was made into digital format, is nothing like the clear version that Time LIFE has uploaded on u tube now how can that be, if the USA government are saying that the NARA copy is the out of camera original, then it should be in digital format 10 times more clearer than what time life has uploaded on u tube ?

[@kayejeyeracer]

7071t6 Agreed!! Sorry for the Loooong delay...haha..we all know the REAL TRUTH!

[@timhawks6101]

Not showing the Z film was just as bad as the government hiding the autopsy pictures and x-rays. Can anyone spell "cover up"?

[@timhawks6101]

C-O-V-E-R U-P

[@dragginboy11]

What is the reaction to Jack White's clear proof (many proofs) of tampering and fraud of this film??? Will this comment be deleted?

[@markrymanowski719]

He was not grieviously wounded. He was dead. The frontal shot to the throat had to be concealed. Hence the fake attempt to revive him.

[@johnbellingham9067]

Dr M T Jenkins said JFK was still convulsing in Parkland Hospital and did not technically die until 1pm

[@jehovahuponyou]

NO FRONTAL SHOT TO THE THROAT, SORRY!!!!!!!

[@jehovahuponyou]

@@johnbellingham9067 PRESIDENT KENNEDY WAS *"DEAD"* AT 12.35 pm THAT DAY - HARD TO LIVE WITHOUT YOUR BRAIN STEM - THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT!!!!!!!

[@Caeruleo]

"The frontal shot to the throat had to be concealed." What frontal shot to the throat? Oh, you mean the one that has never been proven to be a frontal shot.

[@dolnick7]

Since there was an entrance wound on the back of Kennedy and no exit wound, there was clearly no entrance wound in the throat -- except in the fevered minds of the conspiracy industry. The bullet exiting Kennedy's throat did so at the knot of his necktie, thus preventing the flesh from displaying the usual blooming of an exit wound. The doctors at Parkland used the exit wound location to make an incision for a tracheotomy. At Bethesda, the autopsy doctors were puzzled where the bullet went, since they saw a wound of entrance on the back, but no wound of exit in the front. X-rays produced no bullet in Kennedy's body, so where did it go? The mystery was cleared up when they spoke with the Parkland doctors. This is all very old and very public information. The fact that you continue to state easily-refuted assertions tells me that my entire response is most likely a waste of time and you just want to believe what you want to believe regardless of the facts. My bad for trying to set you straight.

[@Filmpilot]

Read C.D. Jackson book by John Allen Stern. Stolley bought the film for Time life and Marina Oswald’s story and never published it. C.D. Jackson was behind the psyop that day with Henry Luce.

[@knowledgeizhell]

@TermsofService Lay off a bit, your boss called and said your style is too aggressive, too obvious, and that if unchecked, you'll be back on the shine box STAT.

[@davidmendoza4983]

Please present original Zapruder film...not the film modified one. you present only you want to show us like CIA, your partners..

[@frederickbowdler8169]

Obviously got money from C.I .A to buy the film 150000 dollars was a lot of money in 63

[@willcollins6956]

The C.I. A. did not buy anything. The government (our tax dollars) paid the Zapruder family just compensation for taking their film. It's called eminent domain. It's in the Constitution, if you are curious.

[@audiolover]

RIP Richard Stolley