Sony a6400 VS Canon M50 - HANDS ON COMPARISON REVIEW!

[@Hexspa]

6:00 the a6400 was focused on the approaching woman that’s why it didn’t grab you.

[@gkoricic]

There's probably gender priority mode somewhere deep in the menus - set to W (obviously). There is/was one for babies/adults.

[@lowag3144]

a6400 is feminist

[@mikepasatieri502]

I think his glasses, which had a reflection, caused the sony a6400 to miss the eye AF.

[@randomcommenter6734]

the a6400 has AI for the autofocus, so it can recognize a face if the eye is not available

[@twentyfifthjt7888]

Probably a 1st person to get focus keeps focus thing, keeping photobombers in check 👊

[@oregonduc]

Canon M50 = economical 1080p KZbin camera. Sony a6400 = still learning but have extra money to spend.

[@Sean-yd4mi]

I think I might get the M50 and use the money to buy a nice lens or two. Total cost will probably be less than the 6400 body.

[@intheworldofmari]

Sean7 that is exactly what I did.. And I do not regret my decision one bit👍🏻 all the best to you 😊

[@jasonrai2115]

intheworldofmari what lenses did you buy?

[@intheworldofmari]

Jason Rai i bought the Canon 10-18mm lens and next up is the 50mm lens..

[@KikoPL]

that's true, also sony lenses are extremely expensive, almost as a body price

[@KILLADADON]

I just bought the M50 yesterday. Can’t wait to shoot some footage in 4K. I have to save up for a another lens though.

[@BiddaNiketon]

In the Thumbnail, he looks like Hrithik Roshan from Koi Mil Gaya. 😂

[@sharma673]

Bidda Niketon 😂😂

[@Nerdhaunt]

Ailaaaa

[@ayushmannanda6163]

i was goin to say that!

[@siddharthakhatri6055]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@adityapathak7540]

😂😂

[@lucuslopez6866]

Sony seems to have better af. More shoots were in focused. 6:04 Sony was too busy tracking the pretty lady in the back.

[@twentyfifthjt7888]

Sony is just following etiquette: • 1st come, 1st serve. • Ladies 1st. • Ignore the random photobomber in the foreground that popped-up from the bottom. +++points sony👍.

[@aarontimber417]

@MrChad97Z These guys are a bunch of basement simps lol.

[@aspataro79]

I have the M50 and it's a great all purpose camera for the price. Everyone focuses on it's video capabilities and forget to mention that it actually takes great photos.

[@snowwalker9999]

It's because most camera users are hybrid shooters these days. I too have the M50 and love everything about it. But to be honest I wish it had better video features.

[@aspataro79]

@@snowwalker9999 hopefully a software patch could fix that??

[@frankfeng2701]

Except A6400 also takes better pictures.😂

[@IsmaelMartinezPR]

My gripe with this video is that is not a fair comparison in any way. The Sony is double the price. What I love most about my M50 is the adaptability to all my L glass.

[@cooloox]

@@IsmaelMartinezPR Also, the exposures weren't always the same. For example, you might notice a nice rich blue sky on the Sony next to a weaker blue sky on the Canon, but this was just a distraction from the fact the face (the main subject!) was correctly exposed on the Canon and very underexposed on the Sony. I prefer my subject exposed correctly, personally. As for custom profiles, why was one not used on the M50? Free profiles are readily available for Canon, I downloaded over 200 of them, including Fuji Astia and other Fuji film simulations.

[@alfredoandbrithzy]

ANYONE ELSE NOTICE THAT GIRLS SHOE CAME OFF AT 6:07 LOL

[@ahmedkamran902]

Lol

[@ASMROW]

She's stupid lol

[@jjahla8398]

A&B omg lolololol stapppp

[@GilbertTheodorus]

good eyes

[@keithspillett7312]

I do actually use an M50 as my main camera these day, and the AF on mine seems to work better than the example used for your test. The results straight out of my camera seem to be significantly sharper than yours.

[@JetBen555]

Its sharper when you watch the video on your computer ? You are watching youtube dude... everything is 10x compressed, the fact that we can actually see a difference in sharpness and noise just show how much better the A6400 is.

[@keithspillett7312]

@@JetBen555 the M50 was badly let down by the lens used on it for this demonstration, which is not generally reckoned to be particularly sharp. The compression on KZbin won't affect the sharpness - 1080P is 1080P, whatever the compression ratio. I've had the opportunity to feed both of these cameras directly into my 50" 1080P monitor, but with an L Series lens on the M50. Shooting at 50P on both cameras, there was next to no difference between them.

[@JetBen555]

@@keithspillett7312 im sorry but you are wrong. Look at any gopro7 video, it shot in "4K" ... yet the M50 completly destroy it in image quality at just 1080P. Because of the bitrate.

[@janlester]

A6400's color looks too digital and smartphone-like, also has a slight green tinge. I think canon is the winner here in terms of color, specially the skin color tones

[@HKFromAbove]

Esp if you tweak the the colour profile.

[@toulcaz31]

Magic Lantern is under testing since April for the M50. It would be interesting to have that test again once ML is fully released. I hope they enable DPAF for 4K and 120fps for 1080.

[@drbeardo6960]

ML can’t add DPAF and more frame rate They add raw video functionality Correct me if I’m wrong

[@kanchisharma130]

Am confused between picking up M50 or A6400 as my first serious cam... Priority for me currently are 1. User friendly operation ( Canon Touchscreen??) 2. Good availability of lens selection (budget being a consideration) My usage will typically be over weekends into landscapes, people and street photography... Can you recommend one option between the two of these please?.. Are M50 colors quite dull wrt A6400?

[@carlitosan1299]

Hello how are you doing? I have the same doubt. What did you buy at the end? I am between the canon m50 and the sony

[@kanchisharma130]

@@carlitosan1299 not bought anything yet... Both systems have different advantages..

[@carlitosan1299]

@@kanchisharma130 I believe that I will decide for the canon m50

[@kerem.akin1]

I just bought the Sony A6400 with the 16-50mm kit lens for 850€ on e-infinity. It's also going to be my first camera ever. I did a lot of research and i think the A6400 is currently the best camera for content creators.The M50 and A6400 are both quite easy to use. One downside of the sony camera is, that sony lenses in general are a lot more expensive, but there are also good budget options from sony or sigma. For 850€, i think it makes sense going for the sony6400,because it's not that much more expensive than the M50.

[@acoustic_ram]

after watching over 100 videos and doing weeks of research, I bought M50 and I'm really happy with it. 😊

[@AprilJoySanico]

As i red the comments, i really find it hard what camera should i buy lol

[@krugmeup2162]

Then use another color

[@EbonySeraphim]

0:22 -- "To the other APS-C king, the M50" said no one who cares about their reputation in the industry. Fuji XT-20/30 and Sony-A6*** are the APS-C kings hands down. Everyone else is playing catch up or unsure if it's worth staying/entering the market. I appreciate the honesty in the review overall though and it was solid. I think in future reviews should be more pragmatic in a few ways. First, stop talking about rolling shutter as a comparison or test. All mirrorless cameras are bad at it. Until a camera does something substantially different (faster) while reading out the pixel data from the sensor, it'll be a reality. I'd just say "it's there, this camera is no better or worse than others out there so if you were expecting this to solve it, you'll be disappointed". Rolling shutter is also something most people don't notice unless they know what to look for while the camera is panning like a maniac. Most natural/real footage won't ever pan that fast while having the noticeable edges too. Second, a major element and feature of portrait photography is eye auto focus. Conveniently, (I hear) it is one of the substantially sub-par features in the M50 where it basically never finds the eye outside of close up and wide open eyes. Older Sony A6*** and Fuji XT cameras are great finding the eye even when the subject is at a distance. The A6400 improves on what was already great and gives you A7III/A9 like accuracy and speed for acquiring eyes and putting it in a $900 camera body, and adds behavior which knows how to gracefully fall back from eye, to face, to object tracking so you don't have to do much at all and have correct focus for continuous photo shooting. Color science I've realized is kind of a BS topic for comparison. For photography basic raw processing can/should be adjusting colors anyways. Video is tougher to correct colors, but if your standard workflow has to using a log color format with color grading later, then the colors out of camera doesn't really matter. Super casual videographers would care that colors out of camera with no work may look better to some folks, but if you're sensitive enough notice the difference between two solid colors, you should I realize this review focused entirely on the video capabilities of both cameras, so it would be fair to point out that both cameras are actually hybrid cameras which are supposed to be fairly solid in both video and photo capabilities. If you're going to cut it out, make mention of that. The M50 seems to be a better camera if you're on a tighter budget (or looking for better value) if you're sticking to 1080p vlogging (better setup with front facing flip screen not getting blocked by hot shoe mics). Outside of that, A6*** series tend to beats it in almost every other relevant way possible. Another area might be lens lineup if you already have and investment in Canon lenses, but if that's you, then you've been doing video or photography long enough to not need this kind of review to make a decision.

[@Mark_How]

at 6:13, the focus test, I think the Sony was locked onto the face of the woman in the background, in the second test she turns around and walks away, and then it picks you up (not sure if this has been commented before)

[@DillonLoomis]

The perfect video camera: - dual pixel AF - ibis - 1080p 120fps - fully articulating touch screen How hard can it be?!

[@DillonLoomis]

I just don't want to go without the dual pixel autofocus from Canon! I'm torn! Want either the M50 or the 6400 but Sony lenses are more expensive as is the body and I'm still not sold on the auto focus there which is a big deal for what I'd use it for!

[@livefullerwithlovefuller8679]

@ant billionz That's really good info that we can buy an adaptor for the Sony and use less expensive Cannon lenses. I'll do some more research about that to make sure it will work for me, but this might be the information that pushes me over the edge to get the Sony. Thanks!

[@nord7556]

@ant billionz Does that adaptor thing affects the photo quality or focal length? I have never used one and I thinking to get on for my Sony camera.

[@andrewfreeman88]

It's called a6600

[@CO8848_2]

That’s the perfect KZbin camera for people who want to film themselves. For others, 1080p sucks. Flip screen is “who cares”.

[@OscarDiazJr98]

Question is. WHAT CAMERA DO YOU USE TO MAKE THIS VIDEO?? ????

[@Abkuyper]

expensive ones that you will not buy

[@DeepteshLovesTECH]

probably the Pany GH5.

[@Boyz92izer]

I was wondering aswell! I think it's the A7II or III

[@ealzaabi3291]

@@Abkuyper Haha nice1

[@mvcapiangular5100]

@@Abkuyper this is what flat nose people mind set

[@flowingwater6813]

Can we sue SquareSpace for ad abuse?? Seriously they make random ads that have nothing to do with squarespace then boom they sneak in square space. Evil just evil.

[@Sr7Sr7Sr7]

One thing you didn’t cover is stabilization... what did you think of the Canon’s Digital Image stabilization? It has a crop and I’m curious if you find it valuable for vlogging vs. not having it. Both cameras offer optical lens stabilization but it doesn’t seem to be enough to make either great for vlogging on its own. Does optical stabilization work better for either camera? To me the Sony would be a no-brainer for vlogging if it wasn’t so damn shaky.

[@sandboxaperture7013]

Thanks for the review. Well done and I genuinely appreciate it. I own the Canon M50 and absolutely love it. I would say I still love it's dual pixel auto focus over Sony's, however, it's undeniable that the A6400 edges out the M50 in a couple categories. But, in fairness, there is still about a 400 dollar difference in price between these two, not really an apples to apples comparison. I think that when considering the huge price difference, an argument could be made for either of these two taking home the bang for buck award. Thanks again for the review.

[@pfksr64]

spent a lot of time deciding between the M50 and Sony 6400, ultimately opted for the Canon. They both have their peaks and valleys and in the end, I would say they are both great. 4K was pushing me towards the Sony but the lens options, cost and software bugs got me to choose the M50. Neither was a bad choice but in the end, it was based on confidence. if both bodies were 100% equal I suspect everyone would opt for the Canon.

[@michaeloeser]

I have an M50 as my backup cam and it´s great for the price. I paid 480 Euros where the Sony is 880 at Amazon (both excl. VAT). So you still compare two cameras that are not that close in terms of price. And of course an almost double priced camera should (and has) better features. On the other hand the Speedbooster at the M50 opens up a whole new world because I have a lot of EF glass (Don´t know if that´s available for the Sony as well). To cut a long story short: The Sony has the better specs but the Canon is almost half the price and does also a great job. Depends on what you need and willing to pay.

[@intheworldofmari]

DER PRiNZ - Photography aaaannnddd that is exactly why I went for the Canon M50.. The price was great for such am awesome little camera 😊

[@kenmasters007]

The sony is double the price of the m50... so if someone wants a recommendation, you first ask what their budget is,... otherwise i would recommend a leica Q or sony A7R etc. lol

[@gettingittogether6189]

i have no idea what camera to buy for youtube now. so lost

[@diegenju8101]

@Phil Rennie Hadou Shoryuken!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@taufiknobo]

Thinking a lot about getting A6400 since it came out for the 120 FPS, useable 4K and that color plus dynamic range... but the hustle to have the mic on the body keeps turning me off.. used eos M3 before and was tired of putting on the bracket all the time plus the bracket is not as stable as it has to..

[@connormccaskill]

A cage is a nice solution!

[@AbdulAziz-rc4nk]

Sony 4k is one of the best out there.

[@frankfeng2701]

And my condolences for that plastic mount of M50.

[@JunaVisual]

Ngpain lu disini bang?😂

[@jimioutback]

I do not have a dog in this race, I am just trying to find the best mid-budget 4k camera for my own travels, but it seems the review has a Sony bias. At 6:44 I looked at the footage and saw that the guy's hat is all blown out on the SONY, and fine on the Canon. Same thing with the light tones in that (street light? with a pigeon on it) over his shoulder. And the highlights are blown out in both, with the Sony showing more color fringing in tree branches. I hate that Canon has a ridiculous crop in 4k, likely ruling it out for me since I want it for walkabout landscape recording and need wide angles, but the Canon just looks so much more 3d (the pigeon guy's beard), and more natural (e.g. the guy's leather jacket). Both have a noticeable color cast, green for Sony, Magenta for Canon, most noticeable in the pigeon guy's leather jacket again. The search continues, 2 candidates down lol. I think if there was a A7s3R, with the lush video of A7S3, but a 26MP sensor, my search would be over for a still/4k video dual purpose tool.

[@virgilpillay]

3:10 Sooooo cool how you managed to get Jared Letto to feature in this video. He seems like a really down to earth guy

[@healing2gether]

Dave, with the 4K crop on the m50 How then does it compare to the image size of 4K with MFT? Thanks, Adam

[@DeepteshLovesTECH]

G85 with smaller MFT sensor, outperforms the Canon in 4k by a full stop. Plus the G85 has much wider FOV than M50 in 4k.

[@brendanwest7703]

Really happy Sony upgraded the auto-focus. That and the unlimited video recording time and clean HDMI output with autofocus is why I’m picking it over the M50. It’s just more versatile: I can use this to vlog, livestream, and other long form content. Hope they are able to utilize the touchscreen more in future firmware updates. Great video!!

[@connormccaskill]

Thanks Brendan! I agree! It's really an amazing package. I kinda want one for personal use now! Lol

[@JetBen555]

No doubt the A6400 is way better than the M50 and well worth the extra money. The M50 was already obsolete when it came out in 2018, it was originally priced at 900$, same as the A6300 (a 2015 camera with better spec) but they had to cut the price (almost immediately) by about 35-40% to stay competitive. Not only that, but the lens selection for EF-M is terrible.

[@filip1491]

The EF-M selection of lenses is indeed a bad bank for the buck, but you could just buy an adapter and get access to all the EF-S lenses, in which case, you get access to lenses that are cheaper than the ones for Sony and feature reliable and silent STM motors. Besides, I think people that buy Canon are just different. We value reliability, longevity, colors that are spot on out of camera, a very forgiving codec and most of all - the user interface on Canon cameras is just better. There is a reason, why so many photographers choose Canon and that is the ease of use. So yeah, although the Sony is technically the better camera, I would still go with Canon.

[@idirus2]

I prefer the M50 colors. I think I will get one...seems really amazing.

[@TJuice1986]

I just sold my Canon 80D and ordered a Sony a6400. It will be here tomorrow! I’m super excited!

[@talalalrazni9677]

I have a canon 80d and im selling it to you recommend me to buy the sony a6400???

[@TJuice1986]

top corner football yes, I do recommend it! The hardest thing to get used to is the size difference, but buy the smallrig cage for it and it feels much better. If you go to amazon or smallrig.com and type in 2310 cage you’ll see it. The photos it takes are cleaner, it shoots 4K, higher 1080 frame rate, and 11fps stills. I would definitely say it’s much better then the 80D. The only down side is battery life. I hope this helped! Definitely pick up the sigma 16mm 1.4 and the sigma 30mm 1.4. They are amazing lenses on the a6400!!!

[@arnabkrdas738]

@@TJuice1986 What about display resolution? I went to sony mall some days back, checked out a series cameras, and I found the display is not crisp at all. I got confused.

[@joedeleon1901]

I like the A6400, it creates stunning images. However, the M50 is well under $1000, about $400 less expensive , is not a similar comparison. Perhaps, price wise, the A6400 is more closely compared to a GH5 or the M50 w/a speed booster? That would be a very interesting video. And because the flip screen on the A6400 is blocked by adding a Mic, it needs a cage. Which may not be a big deal, just noteworthy.

[@frankfeng2701]

Sony surprisingly has more native lenses than Canon.

[@mekaih]

at 5:30 what is the mount used to put the A6400 on top of the M50 like that its a nice rig I would like to replicate! Thanks!!

[@mekaih]

5:36 I mean

[@mukhtaralfuras3840]

EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ] A6400 is much more better camera than A6300 & A6500 because: 1. No 30 minutes record limit: A6300 &A6500 will not get this update do the old tax issue, 2. No overheat (better image processor) like A6300/A6500, 3. Longer battery life 1 hour 30 minutes, 4. Image process from A9 = amazing fast AF better than A6300/A6500, 5. TIME LAPSE build in, 6. Full Flip Screen, 7. A6500 has got IBIS but in video in motion is very bad - you need gimbal and without it you get better price for A6400 $899 (A6400 + gimbal = a bit more than A6500 price), 8. New Hight Dynamic Range picture profile, 9. 2 New AF engines that are only in A6400 - old cameras don't have this (you need this new image processor), 10. Better build in microphone at the front - it offer very nice audio if you are not in wind area, 11. Support for higher iSO, 12. During recording screen doesn't dim. Summarizing: A6400 is better than A6300/A6500 in everthing 😊

[@liaciacia]

how about a6400 compare with a6600?

[@liaciacia]

@Jerome what?

[@jdtravelninja]

I tried my best to watch this review unbiased (i recently bought the A6400), but to be honest the video quality throughout the entire test and all the modes was clearly superior on the A6400. Which makes sense, given that its new and its over 300 dollars more expensive than the M50. The high iso performance looked awesome, and overall 4K shots were stunning. Autofocus is a beast, i can confirm that.

[@zenfiretrading3848]

Yo buddy what gear are you using to shoot your talking scenes in the red sweater. Thats killer footage

[@KINNZ94]

You should add speedbooster, a mic, a light, and perhaps a better lens to M50 to match the price and then compare the two. :)

[@shaolin95]

Lol there is nothing to compare. The 6400 is light years ahead of that canon toy

[@frankfeng2701]

M50 is made up plastic and the mount feels like breaking anytime.

[@lboymusic]

@@shaolin95 right... it's even better than the EOS R toy... I mean, better low light, no 4K crop, 1080p, at 120fps, etc... Sony Cameras keep on spanking Canon cameras :) Even Dual Pixel is now far behind from Sony superior AF performance

[@cooloox]

@@frankfeng2701 That's a straight out lie. The mount feels like any other metal mount, so stop talking crap.

[@cooloox]

@@shaolin95 Grow up, fool. Prefer what you like, but no need to call a perfectly capable camera a toy. I see you in all the camera channels typing childish nonsense.

[@brandonsanders7568]

I have an m50 and the lowlight is just not for me. Anything in photos above 200 iso has noticeable grain. The video is decent though, just want 120 FPS in 1080p, so the a6400 would be my choice as an m50 owner.

[@cooloox]

You need to learn to expose properly. ISO 200 is BS. I get relatively clean images at ISO 800, still relatively clean at ISO 1600, grain noticeable but not bad at ISO 3200 then a big jump to ISO 6400, but still usable. Too noisy at ISO 12800 except in rare circumstances. Here are 2 images, one at ISO 800 and one at ISO 3200 proving noise is not only usable up to ISO 200. Images are 100% crops to keep file size down: 1drv.ms/f/s!As2bMg5NOx76rJMacLueQOeCsTqsjw

[@cooloox]

One thing beginners probably don't know is what resolution they need to print images at common sizes, such as 12" x 8". That particular sized print at photo quality (300ppi) would need 3600px x 2400px. If you have a little grain in the original image, it will mostly vanish if you downsample your image to those dimensions and there will be no grain at all in the print. If you pixel peep then noise is visible at ISO 3200 on the most expensive DSLRs and mirrorless cameras. Don't expect too much from a camera, especially a cheap one!

[@cooloox]

Gee, the strawberry pic I just added to the folder I linked you to (in another post) must be a throw away image due to excessive noise then. OMG it was shot at ISO 1600 under a 5W LED desk lamp. Learn to use your camera before misinforming the public with very inaccurate information.

[@brandonsanders7568]

cooloox I simply said the lowlight is not for me. I do notice grain at 200 iso, I never said it was the end of the world, but it’s just a fact that some cameras are going to perform better in lowlight and the a6400 is one of those cameras. Also, the m50 is aimed at beginners. Not saying I’m a complete beginner, but you can always harp someone for “not knowing there camera enough”, while other tools will help them accomplish there goals easier. Why jump through hoops when you know which one is better for you and your workflow. Plus lack of 120 frames is honestly a deal breaker, and the native lenses for the m50 are just not what I’m looking for. I respect your opinion, and thanks for the info on pixel peeping and exposure. I’m just a hobbyist and the m50 just isn’t for me. I’m glad you’re enjoying it though! I’ve definitely taken some good images on it.

[@brandonsanders7568]

cooloox also great images man! Love the cat pictures. 🙏

[@bbcoinsinc]

Can you shoot Livestream video to KZbin with an external power adapter that plugs into the wall with the M50? We do livestreams that go 3-4 hours at times and swapping batteries would be a deal killer for us. We understand that the 6400 can be plugged into the wall and will stream and charge the battery? Can the M50 do that? Thanks for the help. J&B

[@YDVN]

look for a Dummy battery on amazon

[@PhilandAlex]

Great Video! Signed, a somewhat envious M50 owner.

[@Mrahmedmostafaa]

This video is amazing! Comparison is amazing!! Can you please do 250D and m50 comparison!! Trust me this video has not good comparison, do it!🥰

[@jcruzbryan1836]

Just the review i was looking for. Comparing all footage side by side at diff timeframes and color throughout the entire video. Great work!

[@quarantinaakalillian7359]

👍 Thanks! This video helped me to avoid buyers remorse. The M50 is $550 with a kit lens; The A6400 is $1,000 with a kit lens and it comes with lots of accessories. I bought the Sony. The 6400 has better color, is much more versatile and does a great job with 4K. My gaming PC can handle editing 4K; I'm a student, so, Adobe CC is dirt cheap for me... With a gimbal, a kit lens, and an ultra wide-angle lens, I can recoup my investment by shooting upscale real estate pics and video: Large commissions = large marketing budgets. If I tried to use the Canon for the same purpose, the only realtors that would hire me, wouldn't pay much, because they'd be marketing first-time homebuyer houses.

[@alexwestconsulting]

Anyone with professional prospects should obviously buy the sony over the canon. But for the rest of us...

[@thisiskenyoung]

If u use color profile on Sony, u should also use one for canon. That’s better for comparison

[@blocknovice]

Already have the m50, the sony got more vibrant colour on that vid test

[@ktownva]

What camera was used in the living room/main footage? It is so crispy.

[@r3ximous]

ktownva the z6

[@mattgonzalez]

The quality is pretty similar until you realize the M50 is doing a lot of the tests at a lower quality. For me it’s no question the extra money is worth it. Great comparison

[@ThePerfectGift]

Not just extra money, it's a lot of money right there

[@ethaneveraldo]

This comparison review isn't a fair one because he's using a custom color profile to enhance colors with the Sony a6400. Should have used standard manufacturer settings, or matching color profiles on both cameras.

[@SimpleSandalsMedia]

See why I LOOOOVE this channel? It's videos like these.

[@toshi7220]

Really wanted to get a6400 but was just out of budget. Just got M50 brand-new with lens kit from target for $375. Good enough to begin my photography journey!

[@zyxyuv1650]

the Canon just looks unprofessional, blurry the Sony looks totally different

[@DocBoA]

The moire in the hat in the iso test started almost immediately for the sony. Great comparison. Top notch content upload

[@vinzaputra]

I prefer m50 cos, I can throw viltrox speedboster and voila the smallest fullframe on earth

[@dominick3579]

you can use speedboosters on sony aps-c and sony rx1 is the smallest full frame camera

[@frankfeng2701]

M50 needs a speed booster and a heavy ass EF 24 1.4 to achieve the same look as Sigma 16 1.4😂.

[@vinzaputra]

@@dominick3579 but I heard that for video, the auto focus function is not working =(

[@gusti46]

vinza pramana putra autofocus is working in sony body but kinda hit and miss sometimes. In canon its “very like native” experience.

[@vinzaputra]

@@gusti46 Yeah I have one, and it working beautifully

[@hausgaming]

Do you think there is a difference in image quality on Sony A5100 & the EOS M50? I record sound with an external mic on my PC and sync it in POST, so I don't necessarily need the 3.5mm audio jack on camera. You guys have some awesome videos.

[@JoeyHoogendoorn]

When recommending cameras, I always take into account lens prices depending on what someone likes to take photos/videos of. So if someone wants to get a wide angle in the future, but one brand sells it for 200-300 and the other for 500+$, it makes a huge difference for a lot of people. If they just plan to stick to the kit lens, then comparing cameras alone makes sense.

[@cassianpeterson1830]

Hi! How Are You? I'm good ♡ which camera did you used to record and compare the two cameras? please answer me!🙂🙏🙏👏 me from Brazil 🇧🇷🇧🇷

[@sithlordsoup]

I just broke my RX100V and since I still have my 7D with my lenses, id have to say I’m going back to the canon Fam starting with the m50

[@ishanikataria7391]

Hi, I really enjoy your camera reviews. I was wondering what camera you would recommend for all around videos. I have been looking at the Canon M50 mark ii, Canon 200d mark ii and a few others. Thanks

[@LORDVADER357]

M50 Portrait color. Thats the color pattern i like. HLG of the Sony is also good but i prefer the portrait pattern by the canon.

[@faiitthhyyyyan19]

I'm new to photography and suggestions are highly appreciated. Which one is a better buy for lowlight photography and a better bang for my buck? A6400 or M50 + another lens? I want it to be usable for northern lights so if ever I'm going to purchase A6400, I'd still probably buy sigma 16/30mm f/1.4.

[@StylingwithAlessandro]

I’m trying to decide haha I want a camera that takes great pictures and great videos Should I get the Canon Eos M50 pr the Sony A6400?

[@refugioflores2226]

there are cheap lenses for sony e mount .

[@va8632]

@@refugioflores2226 sony has more expensive body but cheaper lenses?

[@refugioflores2226]

@@va8632 yea i think so i own a nikon with a 30mm sigma and that sigma lens for sony is cheaper than for nikon and canon . but i still think that a dslr of that price will have better dynamic range than a sony A6400

[@va8632]

​@@refugioflores2226 what body would you recommend then? Hopefully from nikon or canon

[@va8632]

@@refugioflores2226 Thanks for answering btw! Appreciated

[@SikandarMansuri]

Nice very Use Full This Video I am Confused Witch Came Buy m50 Vs A6400..???? Realy

[@sizzlemann]

If you want something cheap to get by with, the M50 is for you. But if you want something with better video quality and a little more future proof, the A6400 is the one.

[@connormccaskill]

Exactly right!

[@cooloox]

Absolutely.

[@jddiggy2343]

Hey @kinotika will the sigma 18-35mm f1.8 work with the m50 and speed booster

[@J.Smith-rc6wh]

just find the no flippy screen a deal breaker FOR ME and how I use a camera , flip up just puts it behind the mic and therefore useless , dunno why sony persist with this no flip screen nonsense . . .

[@DeepteshLovesTECH]

Sony A6400 has a flip screen.

[@LifeAsImani]

So my heart was set on the m50, then I used my friend's a600 and loved it....and now i'm thinking about the a6400. I plan my using it mainly for my KZbin channel and some pictures here and there. What would y'all recommend?

[@victoe5780]

Imani Chanel I’m highly interested in purchasing the A6400, but I’m waiting to see if the A6700 is released at the end of this month.

[@sushrutrathod9015]

Please make a video for photography review also...

[@aravindhsathiyamoorthi6377]

You recommend a6400 but the performance of the M50 increases while using a VILTROX Speed Booster. So in this case would you recommend M50 with a VILTROX Speed Booster?

[@olgamoraiti]

You just answered to my dilemma! I was between those two, because of the low budget 4K canon, but now I know! Sony for sure! Thanks a lot!

[@salsabila889]

this is the best video for me who confused to buy either one of these, (focused on videography). i've just only found video that conclude the specs, features and everything, but what i really need is the comparison LIKE THIS (that you packed so beautifully, easy to compare with each of the features (like 4k, 120fps, stuff)). so i really know which one is the best for me. thank you very much for making this video. thank you for the effort! great video! first video ever that i watched from your channel, liked this video and subscribed to this channel.

[@TomasRamoska]

Big price difference 500 vs 900.

[@mavfan1]

Tomas Ramoska big performance difference 4K.

[@frankfeng2701]

The difference on the photo side is just as big as on video side

[@TomasRamoska]

Double the price double the difference :)

[@cooloox]

@@frankfeng2701 No it's not, the difference is a lot less than you think. The biggest IQ difference is in high ISO. I was looking at a comparison between the A6300 and M5 today and I was amazed at how close they are in image quality (including tech specs). The 2 cameras in this video produce better IQ than their 2 counterparts I just mentioned.

[@cooloox]

@@frankfeng2701 before you even tout your BS, if you want a shootout then set a subject and we'll do it. Put your photos where your mouth is, what are we shooting? I'm in Australia, so we'll just have to shoot similar subjects in similar lighting conditions. We can compare overall IQ.

[@cooloox]

Great comparison. You showed that the A6400 is a great camera and the M50 is also a great camera for its price. I bought an M50 for street photography and it's surprisingly good for the price. I customised my buttons such that manual mode is a dream to use now and nearly every common setting has fast access. I'd love to play with the A6400 to test its AF. Going back to the M50, you really have to know it to get the most out of it. You need to know where AF tracking mode will excel and when to switch to zone AF or single-point AF or even small AF single-point too. Get to know these and you'll rarely ever misfocus a shot.

[@jordanjk]

Hey Kinotika! Great comparission video! Still got one more question: how does it look like with the battery life?

[@connormccaskill]

Interestingly enough the battery life has improved with the Sony quite a bit compared to the older models. I would say that the Sony actually has better battery life than the Canon

[@mavfan1]

Kinotika not what he was looking for I think!

[@anirbandebnath4]

What is the name of the background music used during the comparison video ?

[@josephseason]

He didn’t mention the great advantage of the articulating screen on the m50 hence a thumbs down.

[@ovwmkfour9915]

josephseason the A6400 also has it maybe that’s why he left it out

[@mihirmishra2313]

Which music was playing in the background??

[@g5magic]

A6400 is perfect for my hand.

[@KuozyMusic]

i enjoyed this video. thank you for putting the comparison shots at the beginning then talking about the specs. watched the whole way through got great info.

[@funanya100]

Based on your excellent review, i Just ordered M50. Happy days!

[@ototem]

Hey guys - great real life test - thanks! But are my glasses dirty on M50's left side of video or is it lost in focus in each part but pigeon man?

[@mokshvasant]

Why is the video uploaded at 360p

[@connormccaskill]

It’s still processing unfortunately! It’ll be 4K soon. Just waiting on KZbin

[@tan334]

Can’t decide what to get

[@alexis1959]

Based on what I saw (rather than what I heard), I'd go for the M50

[@intheworldofmari]

Alexis Hadjisoteriou thats what I did.. I love my Canon M50 😊 such a great little camera..

[@brian6203]

I agree! I must have bad eye sight as I thought the M50 looked better..

[@christopherpackart]

How about long recordings with the a6400? Overheating? Can it be overcome with an external recorder so there is no inside processing to overheat it. I want to find something that can be used for streaming and long interviews.

[@VilkanVisions]

Check Max Yuryev video on that topic.

[@G1neCreatez]

I just picked up the m50 creator kit this past weekend! Thank you for your videos and reviews, it helped me pick this camera. Love Cannons color compared to Sony.

[@ArtformInsights]

As someone who used the M50 as my YT video camera for a year, I found my videos looking more crispy and better straight out of camera on the A6400 which I prefer for YT. For filming cinematic sequences, I prefer m50’s Color science but the 4K crop is the death knell sooner or later.

[@luiscastillo1287]

I will buy m50 soon! Gonna be my first camera 😂 hope I make a good choice !!

[@juzzypham7421]

Kinotika, would you able able to do another video, showing step by step how to do Clean HDMI OUTPUT on the a6400 Menu. Much appreciated.

[@gothickah0]

Im getting M50 because of the vari angle screen.

[@cnsuth67]

Thanks for the video. I currently own a Canon XTi and am considering upgrading. Is it better to go with the M50 and get the adapter for my existing lenses or start from scratch with the a6400? I primarily shoot photos. Thanks

[@StefanieandCaleb]

You guys are awesome!!! So cool connecting with you!! 😎🤙

[@connormccaskill]

Stefanie and Caleb same!!! Great meeting! Let’s stay in touch!

[@julya400]

Thank you!! What lens to you suggest for 4k video with the M50?

[@JonathanBarrow]

I came to early. Video only allows 360 p. I’ll be back Also I already know the 6400 is better but I still watch anyway

[@connormccaskill]

Ya sorry! Thought it was done processing. Guess not!!

[@Hexspa]

It’s done processing now

[@naz9415]

Sir which lense are used in the videos for m 50 I like the zoom effects gives cinematic feeling can u recommend me one.

[@Beezzzzy_]

Drop that Sony Color profile link 👀

[@connormccaskill]

Here ya go! Love the profile! www.eoshd.com/2017/09/new-eoshd-pro-color-3-0-eoshd-pro-log-comes-sony-cameras/

[@mordrenraven]

The background music is dope! Did you guys make it? Can't shazam that song. tried 3 times, 3 totally came out

[@SivaJnana]

I really think I found a vlogging camera for myself! The Canon M50 thanks for sharing!

[@connormccaskill]

Thanks for watching!

[@intheworldofmari]

Siva Jnana same here.. I love my Canon M50 😊 All the best to you 😊

[@SivaJnana]

intheworldofmari yeeeah!

[@SivaJnana]

Kinotika thank you also. I have subscribing long time ago!

[@jkl89966]

Hi, can you share how you are doing those caption text in your video? Thanks.

[@HarrisonFamilyValues]

I think the reason why the a6400 didn't focus is that it picked up the woman behind you, but when it did pick you up her head was turned so your face was the only one identifiable in the shot. 🤷‍♂️

[@connormccaskill]

Good point! Maybe!!

[@HarrisonFamilyValues]

@@connormccaskill replied to my comment... MADE MY DAY!!!!!!!!!! :-) :-) :-)

[@HarrisonFamilyValues]

@@connormccaskill I am pre-ordering the a6400 tomorrow and will use your link to support. Thanks for the videos you produce.

[@yashwantjamdade4710]

Perfect caught

[@jordanjk]

Naah. Was for sure at trees and car behind him. Maybe it is lacking when it is too contrasty or subject is not light properly.

[@AltarDeAdoracion]

How does the Sony compare to the Panasonic camera around the same price?

[@connormccaskill]

Idk! We should test! I will say without a doubt it will smoke it in terms of autofocus.

[@Albertoepicness]

@@connormccaskill ooooooh

[@AltarDeAdoracion]

Thanks for the reply. Awesome. Keep the videos coming.

[@dukebozikowski3801]

The a6400 is the more professional camera that gives you way more for your money. The m50 is better for vlogers, certain photographers, and less tech-savvy people who want a good result that is easy to achieve.

[@cooloox]

Why less tech savy? That's an arrogant statement and not true. The M50 needs to be totally customised to give a good manual mode photography experience and needs to be set up for automatic transfer to phone or PC, etc. Non-tech savy people would never discover half of the things in the M50 or be able to set them up.

[@caldera878]

Non tech savvy folks don't even want to touch a dedicated camera in the first place anyway. Amongst the day of $1000 smartphones, this is what they primarily use.

[@horseLoverPhat]

Hey man! Would love some advice, been thinking of buying the a6400 but still undecided - I’m an amateur but looking to get properly into photography (and videography) but I’d like to start with something that doesn’t break the bank. One of the cons I’ve heard of the a6400 is the fact it doesn’t have a headphone jack (along with the stuff you mentioned) - for a person like me whose looking to learn photography what would you recommend?