Sony a9X | I Want This Camera

I share my thoughts on the rumored Sony a9X. Rumored to have more than 50Mpx, 8k30p, and an announcement around Q1 2021.
Affiliate Disclaimer: All links mentioned in the description are affiliate links for B&H Photo Video.
WEBSITE
www.that1cameraguy.com
Business Inquiry
[e-mail]

[@variananora]

megapickles, that is some new vocab that i learn today.

[@ItsJaeLaw]

😂😂😂

[@stacybehrens7152]

I shoot an A9 now. Good camera. Takes great pictures. I don’t care about more mega pickles 😂 or 8k video. What I want are menus that don’t make my eyes bleed (partly accomplished) and vastly better modern network connectivity. Not some crappy ftp upload or a terrible app. I want to have it easier than my smartphone to put my pictures wherever I want them without touching an SD card and without having to push any buttons or use any apps. Wired and wireless. Improve the workflow. Make it painless. THEN I will have mental space to care about lots of pixels and 8k video which I mostly won’t use anyway.

[@benwonderfulmedia]

The a7 series is the hybrid series, I think sony separates their cameras perfectly. 9 series for sports pros, R for photo, S for video and 7 for hybrid. The c is a compact a7iii.

[@lifeat35mm]

I figured this is to compete with the upcoming Canon R1x and not the R5. So a $5,000 price point would be about right.

[@liemsters]

That’s why i like this channel!!! No loyalty, just needs!!!

[@pinkflairgirl]

I personally don’t care about the video specs (I take photos only), but I’ve been hoping Sony would come out with a higher megapixel A9. Fast, silent, good low-light capabilities, and 50 MP (with the option to use fewer)? Sounds pretty perfect!

[@bagelsurf]

I am in the same camp as Mimi. Don't care about video, just a higher megapixel a9 so I can do high resolution action wildlife and BIF. Who would have thought that Canon was going to answer my prayers with the R5. So glad Sony was forced to respond. Can't wait. If Sony had done it earlier, it would have killed Canon for good, so I think they messed up.

[@phayoun]

I remember he begged for sony a7siii, now he asked for good hybrid similar to Canon r5

[@Spartacus1975]

On my wishlist: A camera only for photography, but with more options like focus stacking, RAW stacking (for astrophotography), Pixel shift-RAWs calculated inside the camera, lossless compressed RAW, better back screen, the new menu system etc. The videographers have their A7SIII, it would be nice to have a camera for landscape/astro-shooters.

[@bagelsurf]

I shoot high resolution action wildlife and birds in flight (BIF) so I have been wishing for a camera with the A7R4 resolution (40MP or more) with the A9 fast focus, tracking and 20 FPS. The Canon R5 came along and was everything I would want (on top of video too?).. I am thrilled that Sony is coming out with this A9x. They need to!! The A9 performance has been out now for 3 years. If they had come out with this before the R5, they would have put the nail on the coffin for Canon. Prefer one camera to have it all vs. having to carry so many specialized cameras.

[@Suroky232]

I agree! i also just want the one hybrid that does it all with no overheating.

[@hisashijrauman3692]

Expect a fan, or something like the S1H, imagine processing 8k with that small of a body.

[@jdpst20]

It will never happen. End Users will NEVER EVER be happy with anything. It will always be something. Technology will always evolve and end users will always just buy shit anyways. If you want the perfect camera then develop it yourself. What is "all" that you want? 1000 megapixels. 12k 120fps with a workable codec 40 stops of dynamic range, 50 mp stills, This is how these companies stay in business and continue to evolve. In 2 years it will be the A7R5 or 6 with 90mp who knows. Like just get a friggin camera and shoot with it.

[@RainBowBaLLerHD]

@@jdpst20 we just want 4k 120 with more megapixels :(

[@jdpst20]

@@RainBowBaLLerHD Yeah I mean I hear ya. I think we will def get it though when the Sony A7iv comes out or even the A7R5. The A7siii is fantastic but someone who wants the best of both worlds you are really only optioned to Canon R5, unless you have deep pockets and roll with the Fuji GFX100 which well only really does 4k30, but still what a beast. I think end of this year and Q1 2021 will be a large jump forward for other companies gunning for Canon or Sony spotlight. I think Fuji will come out with XT5 / XH2 and it will be 4k120p with options up to 6k30 or shoot even 60, and a new 32mp sensor that I think sony is working on. one can dream.

[@anapepemartins]

Thank you for your videos! =)

[@syracuselux1450]

Totally agree! Perfecting the Hybrid is the way to go!!! Triple “!” People are looking for a kit to fit into a single bag and have a smaller footprint. They want to use the camera in their hand for what ever they are looking to do! If they work on perfecting maybe a 32mp stacked backlight sensor, true 10-14 shutter per sec, no buffer so I can switch from video to stills and back without lag. Then I would buy at least two so I don’t have to change my lens during the wedding. The Perfect Hybrid! Lastly, why 32mp.....sharper, cleaner, still a manageable size, should be able to have clean 6k, and with a stacked sensor slightly larger body and larger grip would also be a happy acceptable result. One can dream....hopefully Sony will make the dream come true!

[@rsakamoto808]

YES totally agree with you on the pricing $3999.99! 50 mp with Small, Med & Large RAW, new menu system, CF express & touch screen!

[@IMDABROWN]

Yeah, that is the camera I would love to have. I agree Sony has way too many full frame models To choose from. But they can offer something to most people but not offer that one camera that most people want.

[@angelguzman8737]

I have the a7riv and siii but I really want a powerful hybrid camera so I’m thinking to switching over to to the R5

[@Rascallucci]

My dream list will be 1) 50 or ideally more MP which will allow me to shoot the camera in APS-C crop mode with enough resolution for cropping in, 2) must improve the animal eye AF and tracking to match the R5 or to better it to reclaim the throne, 3) very fast frame rate, much faster than the A7R IV while still allowing me to enjoy the benefits of the high res sensor, 4) must cut down on the buffer drastically, perhaps by using two CFExpress Type A cards for max write speed, 5) better IBIS, 6) bigger body with a bigger and much more high res LCD screen.

[@jaysnappsmediallc6680]

I thoroughly enjoyed you giving your opinion, it was refreshing. I’m canon all the way but this is interesting

[@Rascallucci]

Well, if they want to charge US$2K more than the R5, then they will have to give me: 1) a high res sensor, 50 MP is only 5 MP more than the R5, give me more, I shoot birds I need more resolution for cropping in. 2) Frame rate, it will have to be faster than the R5. At least 14 mechanical and may be around 25 electronic minimum. 3) Even more importantly is the AF. The word is R5's AF has already surpassed Sony especially with regards to animal eye AF and tracking. The R5's overlay appears from much farther away than the Sonys, Sony will have to retake the lead in this department. And don't forget, the Canon R1 will be launching in 2021 too. The question then becomes if the A9 is truly Sony's ultimate flagship series, shouldn't it compete with the R1 as opposed to R5? The R1 will have some pretty innovative features, so the A9X better have something different to offer too.

[@lhutton1]

Love your music selection👍🏾 I am good with my a7iii 👍🏾👍🏾

[@12340786ful]

Where did you go again?

[@ToonTVDerek]

I agree but isn't the A9 series supposed to compete with the 1DX series? If that's the case then I think that price is justified in my opinion.

[@ericsamuels6250]

I agree with you and all in one is what I need too

[@Bluerush1992]

Isn’t their A9 series supposed to be their flagship similar to Canons 1DX? The 1DX mark iii is like $6500 I feel like $5500 is a better price. Not super affordable but it’s not gonna be more expensive than a 1DX

[@DovisG]

Would consider buying it, if it had: Low resolution mode without crop (to mimic A7/A7S); something like "Internal Electronic ND filter"; Internal GPS for location tags (hard to use current technology by sharing coordinates from phone while using 2x camera bodies); Full flip screen (from Sony A7C); top part of camera with silver frame design (from Sony A7C); improved joystick control of AF; Video mode 4k@120fps without recording limit and overheating; Customizable color of AF point on screen; Assignable button for very fast switch from human to animal AF :)

[@jaysenzapata9527]

Are you done with restoremysneakers?

[@karim1485]

Totally get what you mean with slimming down the FF product line and I guess it would increase economies of scale and reduce costs. But: Imagine a cross shape, in the middle you have the original A7 series for the best all around capabilities. If you tend to be a photographer, go to the right (A7r) If you do video, go to the left (A7s) If you are willing to spend more, go up (A9) if you want to save, go down (A7c?) 😂 Sure, the last series‘s release was questionabl(y late) but adding a camera to the top right, that pushes the original A9 a little to the left would be interesting for people with more money available to boost their current A7R3/4 into video capabilities too.

[@sirgigolo]

But everyone was saying how 8K was overkill and that it is not needed. Now Sony is coming out with it and now it’s a must have😂

[@bnguyen112]

There's already talks of an EOSR1. This is going to be very interesting to see what both companies bring.

[@Linealo]

The general idea sounds nice, just like the canon, but I'm not sure if this is a camera for the A9 series - but I don't know where to fit it else in Sony's line up. The A9 so far was focused at sports and maximum AF and shutter speed performance - especially with the no blackout stacked sensor. A lot of the people using it are using it for it's still relatively small 24mp (especially press) and it's high capabilities in general speed and size. I'm not saying the A9x would be a bad idea, the opposite, but I think Sony should find its own name for it. The Alpha X without a 9 maybe. But something I'm actually worried about is the body. Sony fixed a lot of issues with their software with the A7sIII, but to keep the heat and feel of this controlled, I want Sony to finally mix up their bodies formula a little bit. Their grip is still way to close to the lens (can't wear gloves in winter) and the rear screens are the smallest of today's FF competition. The bodies are also not really as well weather sealed as other manufacturers - tho that makes heat a problem again. So I think it's necessary for Sony to change a decent amount of the body design to actually make this camera. Sony needs this camera, a true hybrid again. Maybe even let it be the A7rV and make the series skip the A7IV to make a lower Res version of the A9x but actually name it A7V

[@ToneFuentes]

Photo Rumors (don't know it it'a a reliable sorce), the A7 IV will come until Q3 next year :(

[@peterm6238]

I totally agree with you about Sony releasing too many versions instead of one great version that can do all things. I too am excited about this newer version that can do both Stills and Videos in the best quality. I don't want to buy two separate cameras and I too think $3,999.00 is more than enough for this camera.

[@hajime5486]

I have the a7RIV and waiting for my a7Siii coming in. I don't need something like the a9X because between the 2 cameras I have they are the perfect pair. You can't shoot and record at the same time so you kind of need 2 if you are doing both

[@amdenis]

Really great videos BTW. Thanks! I am looking forward to the A9’s successor. Before considering that R5, let me share a few important things that have translated into enjoying the art of photography a lot more, while significantly increasing associated revenues. I felt the same way about not having two cameras, but in 1 year of doing it I found something out that really surprised me. After shooting with some successful photogs of some renown who have done this for years, I tried their recommendation of always keeping a zoom on one and an appropriate prime on the other. Street vs wildlife vs sports are different combos. All I can say is that I shoot much more relaxed, with better creative focus and cleaner sensors than needing to change lenses last minute or having to make do by cropping and losing resolution and/or DOF- and more importantly, nailing a lot more great (often lucrative) photos- some of of them that paid for the other body several times over. Now I almost always go out with two cameras ready to go. I used to travel with a 1DXII plus lenses and batteries, etc, so it still is easier and lighter than before. Now, to the R5.... We use a range of Canon, Blackmagic, Sony and Panasonic cameras, and purchased two R5’s last month. We have a lot of EF glass as well. All I can say related to our R5 experience is, SO MANY PROBLEMS AND LIMITATIONS... We love Canon for solid, dependable performance. Used their DSLR and Cinema lines for many years. But the R5 has all of the low-light focus, stabilization, metering, overheating and other issues that many have found, and more. The 30 minute limitation because Canon did not want it to compete with their cinema line sucks but is acceptable, as we knew about that going in when we ordered them. However, first, the overheating is real- and not just with video. If you shoot any high quality video, it starts the count down that limits subsequent stills shooting. It happened with both R5’s the same way, in that we did a little b-roll for a minute here or there, some stills, continued to walk and look for more B-roll, and then... with the cameras not being used for most of the following hour other than a still shot here or there, the first then the second R5 shut down for hours and were unusable. Same thing happened again and a third time- even putting them in plastic bags in the cooler bags for 20-25 minutes before the third time. So, for Wednesday, we brought a Blackmagic and Sony and used them most of the day. Then when we got done shooting, the editing format problems reared their nasty head. We shoot a lot of 4K, 6K, 6.5K and 8K, but even on our high end edit and VFX bays the R5 was a very poor edit. You have to transcode it, which takes 3:1 at best, and 18:1 at worst, depending on the format. 2010 dual XEON with Titan X, a $29K 2020 Mac Pro or similarly decked-out dual 2080Ti i9 PC’s didn’t matter. Canon has real format issues. The lens was great and a step in the right direction, but even the new C70 that Canon had said is the pro entry level camera for cinema video is an S35, which doesn’t even compete with the Blackmagic 6K in many respects. So in a wide range of use cases, based on our and many others’ experiences, we need to forget about thinking the R5 is a pro video camera; even for B-roll- at least if your time and shooting schedule are valuable commodities. So, simply stated, we we all very saddened by the R5’s limitations and problems. However, we did get to try out the new Sony A7SIII. Now THAT is one amazing pro caliber video camera, which will eliminate our need to rent the ARRI’s anymore, once they come in next week. And it has amazing focus, tracking, exposure, low-light, grade-ability, actual dual redundant card recording. We found out the hard way on “Alice” (one of the R5’s), that the R5 is sequential proxy- not a dual redundant system, which resulted in 2 corrupted SD cards when the first one got bad writes that were proxied to the second. That was beyond the final straw for us on the R5. However, if you just want to use it for stills, other than some metering and low light focus/tracking issues, it was great. So, that may be a good reason to get one, especially with the new lenses- although if I wanted a better stills camera for sports/wildlife or landscape respectively and was considering buying new lenses anyway, I would go with an A9 or A7RIV respectively, and avoid all those R5 issues until the A9X arrives, while getting better performance envelopes and very usable video capabilities that do not cause all the R5 issues. For cine or serious pro video, it would now be the A7SIII without a doubt. That is if you need ARRI-level capabilities, or low-light creative an other abilities far beyond any ARRI or related alternatives. Heck, we have two died in the wool Canon aficionados who’ve hated Sony and called them “toys” for years, who are getting the A7SIII, so that said a lot to me.

[@afonsosantos8364]

I also wanted this camera ... ...until I read the sensitivity spec on the imx313 sensor spec sheet. It has half the sensitivity of the IMX554 30mpx sensor to be used on the A7M4. I don’t want an 48mpx A9X/A9R, I want an IMX554 equipped 30mpx 30fps A9M3 with 9mp EVF, top of the line Bionz processor for 60fps AF, CFe + SD cards for $3999.

[@georgelett8317]

I'm liking $4,800 max if its a awesome camera with all the specs and no compromise on overheating.

[@gkochanowsky]

When you compare the number of cameras that Sony offers compared to Canon, I think Sony has shown restraint. But I agree with you, if Sony is gonna compete on price as well as quality, they will probably need to reduce their offerings.

[@OrwinSantaCruz]

I think the others were $4500 at release right? That seems fair. I personally think 36MP would be best. When I had a D800, that was impressive compared to other cameras at the time and I haven't been impressed like that with any increases. That way you could maintain high MP but hopefully keep a massive buffer with the new cards. Buffer is more important than MP to me. A7siii video features are fine though I'm not someone that sits around grading stuff (though I've tried) 8k is neat but unnecessary but if they can pull it off without overheating that'd definitely make Canon look bad.

[@stevenboesky6692]

I want this too

[@fantagaming2190]

If this 50mp and has a 20fps continuous shooting, it would be the beast

[@JM-le3wn]

If its 50mp....hopefully they will have a low res/low light mode that chains the photo sites together into larger ones.... going to need that kind of refinement to justify more than $4,000.....

[@ChrisMitchells_FlyingCameras]

I don't agree that having several choices in Sony full frame cameras is bad. Since when is have MORE choices a bad thing?

[@mikni4069]

Are there to many options? Sure there is, if money is not an issue for you. The problem is that Sony would loose allot of customers if they only offered a A7 and A9. That’s why the specialised A7R and the A7S makes perfect sense because it allows people with restraint to get their specific needs covered without having to a premium for something they might have no need for. Honestly what Sony is doing is no less confusing than what Canon (R5, R6, R, RP) and Nikon (Z6, z7, z5 and the rumoured S versions of these and z8/9) is doing, however I think their naming at least make it somewhat easier to understand. That said the A7C is really not needed and it only muddies the picture. Would I get the A9x no, as I have no need for it, I don’t do videos so I’ll settle with the newest A7R and then use the A7 as a backup camera. I completely agree that the pricing should come close to that of Canon and it should have 24fps or more and Global shutter would make it desirable for many.

[@kalali462]

For $5500, beyond the obvious upgrades, give me this: prerecord buffer, ND filter, flash transmitter, ISO invariance, advanced IBIS, flash sync in silent shooting, 14 fps mechanical shutter, sensor shielding, flip-out monitor that can also _just_ tilt up/down, 4:2:2 10-bit video, Sony's picture profiles.

[@DimplePoji]

Same camp here.. i just need 3 cam that can do all 😅

[@themasonera]

Yeah the R5 did it at under $4k but it has a major problem. People would pay a little more for a camera that wouldn’t overheat

[@joegophotos]

Where is it 😫

[@SterlingSanders]

Until recently the A7R series was the greatest hybrid. The A7RIV still has great video, just doesn’t have the slow mode in 4K. But it’s still a the current champ in terms of stills. Also, I disagree, I would rather sony release more cameras for people’s various needs. The only thing they’re missing is a high resolution stills camera that does 10bit 4K+60/120

[@alexsmedile]

yeah, good camera, but I'll wait the a7IV✌️

[@pop1348]

So... Now the APS-C is dead ?

[@pop1348]

The Tamron 17-70 F2.8 is out !!!! I guess aps-c is not dead anymore :p

[@whitewalker9622]

Correct! To many cameras. On the still side I need max 5 fps but good autofocus for around 1000 dollars. Cine side, internal 422 8 bit 1080 120p and good autofocus for 1000 dollars. Still cameras and cinecameras are Just diferent. Could Sony put this in one package? Fullframe mirrorless? Could not care less for electronic shutters, only mechanical for me please ♥️

[@hiwng]

just wait for the new apsc from sony system

[@sizzlemann]

Preach brother, preach!

Bring Global Shutter at under 5 thousand and boom, game changer. Would rather have that than 8k

[@CASMANWHAT]

I love megapickles

[@Ramotttholl]

yeah they have way to much.. though i can understand the A7... A7S, A7R and A9 as one is a ballanced of all and the other 3 are specialized for a specific goal. and for compact series they have the a6000 line. its just A7C and A9X wha?

[@jackharwick2080]

When you give consumers more choices than good, better, best, they get confused and don't buy anything.

[@MrDonuts10]

Confirming there’s no overheating on your thumbnail that’s a lot of confidence and a bit petty towards canon lol

[@goldenfist75]

Megapickles? Dude I thought you were a teacher..

[@stevefitzgerald9193]

he was joking. what u have no sense of humor?

[@ReillyMcGlashan]

totally agree. high megapixel with outstanding video so i only need one camera... buying two different cameras is dumb when you could have one to do all of it... sony make it happen

[@kenchen704]

Reilly McGlashan I understand you want one camera that can do it all, but there are people who just want one between photos and video and they rather not pay thousands of dollars extra for functions they don’t need and won’t use. That’s the A7R and A7S in a nutshell. Now, these two cameras serve a greater purpose, that is to employ technologies that will eventually go on the best of the best hybrid camera, and to be honest that camera would deserve the 5 thousand dollar price tag, because sometimes two Camry won’t do the job of one Porsche, if you get what that means.

[@ReillyMcGlashan]

@@kenchen704 I am just thinking along the lines of Sony matching the R5... this is the perfect spec camera for me.. If I didn't already have a sony camera now I would buy the R5 because it hits everything I need... Sony can definitely match this plus a little extra... 50megapixels instead of 45 extra... Canon also have set the price point for a camera like that now so? I am not too sure what you are trying to say?

[@skullier13]

People forget that the R5 is not even the crème de la crème of canon hybrid shooter... The r1 is coming...

[@oliverrichetti3736]

3:33 I mean, you are that one camera guy.

[@ptipete]

Expect a lot overheating issues with a small body!

[@kenchen704]

That camera will deserve the 5000 dollar price tag if it delivers on the reasonable expectations, because two Toyota’s won’t add to a Porsche. You can buy both the latest A7R and A7S and spend 7000 dollars, but neither one of them along can match this 5000 dollar camera by itself because it does it all. And if using two cameras is more of a pain in your opinion, what’s wrong with paying a little extra to make that inconvenience go away?

[@yixuz42]

How is that a R5 killer??? That’s just a matchup for R5...

[@seoulrydr]

Global shutter, anyone?

[@HeroShotz]

GLOBAL SHUTTER and that gyro thing instead of ibis.

[@JS-wz3km]

Its like cell phones, they are testing the market to see what you are willing to pay ...

[@RolandAyala]

Everybody says don’t need 8K, and then jumps on it at first whiff of becoming available for “their” system. Just like high MP and stills.

[@misreb1]

Canon style animal AF with flip out screen, high res EVF, 50 mp for $4000 and I am in. Otherwise I will be sticking with my A7iii for another year

[@willgavillan]

if Sony does a c70 type camera, with a full frame 6k/8k sensor, I'll happily pay $5500

[@psykobibi]

As a Canon 5D4 shooter if the A9x (with the new menus system, Rotated screen, etc ... ) is REAL bro !??... listen to me ... TAKE MY WALLET !

[@orphax1925]

wtf do people want 8k to export 1080px on youtube

[@a.z2972]

I got my a7siii, its epic!!

[@phathanaphan]

I haven’t gotten any signs of mine coming soon. Did you get some kind of first withdrawal from your account before it shipped?!

[@a.z2972]

@@phathanaphan no i pre ordered at no cost and paid in store when it came in. I’m in England

[@EverythingFilmmaking]

They are not gonna give you 4k120 on this camera...

[@kenchen704]

Yes, we are all used to the 4500 dollar flagship Sony concept, but sincerely, paying 500 dollars extra for a lot more features that combines from two 3500 dollar cameras is a big steal.

[@howardtownsend2574]

Not when they are a year later than the competition, who has it cheaper.

[@jasonnowwhat5041]

8k no overheating isn’t enough for you to pay 1DXiii money? Jesus.

[@JF..]

Sony Omega coming soon 😂 Love Sony tho .. 👍

[@Bobbylopezcreative]

Stop with the megapixel wars already! Very, very few people need or take advantage of such high megapixel images. They slow everything down and fill hard drives needlessly

[@8spiro]

a7iv for 2k and this r5 killer at 4k... and sony win the war

[@HeroShotz]

Dammit sony 😑 why they have to play with our hearts like this LOLOL. I'll be getting this beast.

[@a1exsand]

Pre pandemic I think people might purchase this camera. Post pandemic not a shot. Theirs so many people not even paying their rent because they can't afford it right now and sony wants to release this camera and charge over $5000? People need to get their priorities straight.

[@Jessehermansonphotography]

Should just do 6k and have no overheating. 8k is stupid

[@360fullhd]

Your price point is funny to Sony. They pricing new cameras like it break through, look at crappy a7c or ZV1

[@iamwhatiam6281]

the perfect camera for brick walls at 25fps 🤪

[@CarlBergsdorf]

50 megapickels

[@KaioshinAemi]

Megapickle

[@stkuj]

I want a bucket of pickels!

[@Leo-jd2ny]

The new Sony Camera in 2021, will be a A8-Camera, with 8K, ......

[@MajorMotions]

I just got my a7siii two days ago, and that’s all I need for video. I already did 4 paid jobs with it and it’s a beast! I also think $5,500 is perfect for the a9x.

[@robertocordero4682]

It’s better the have specific cameras with specific purposes. I for one could careless about low light, video or speed. I prefer I higher megapixel with high resolution. @bobbyfingers

[@terryhe9857]

Sony will never never improve mechanic shutter. With stack sensor, sony will eventually kill mechanical shutter and replace it with global electronic shutter

[@onlyonecannoli3952]

Why would Sony want to make an all-in-one camera when people like YOU are outright admitting that you will buy two separate cameras to fill those needs if left with no other choice?

[@mattgray9297]

I’d settle for Sony just making enough A7SIII bodies to meet the “unexpected” demand.

[@ptipete]

I wish you would go back on reviewing cameras and equipment. All this videos on rumors ain't worth watching!!!

[@ajschot]

Ah sonyalpharumors... ok next

[@DonovinJones]

Sony users are going to become unbearable if this camera comes out 😂😂

[@reaganrovillos4313]

Hey im your number fan from the Philippines, give me a Christmas gift lens for my sony a6000 please 😁😘

[@DeusExAstra]

Please stop with the megapickles. It's annoying.

[@manuelp7472]

I really dislike your imperative tone in the video. It's of course fine to voice your opinion, but yelling at a company to obey your opinion is a bit much venturing. In the end, there are surely other photographers with different opinions. A “please” can change a lot.

[@JoGero]

You must really dislike KZbin. What you've described is the prominent culture of KZbin.