South Korea vs Japan: Who owns Dokdo/Takeshima?

[@PoliticswithPaint]

A big thank you to Teabag, the Korean artist who contributed his art to this video which you can enjoy between 5:24 - 7:45. Without his help, this project would have taken even longer. I highly recommend you check out his Twitter here: twitter.com/elpg1576

[@anentiresleeveoforeos2087]

Beautiful art.

[@DesertsOfHighfleet]

nice art

[@phylloence]

wow only two replies i mean three

[@sa-np1wd]

Korea rejected proposal of ICJ. Maybe they understand they become loser.

[@토론왕틈새아재]

당연히 일본의 땅입니다. 하지만 한국은 인정하지 않을 것입니다. 한국은 원래 남을 내리고 자신을 올리는 나라니까요. 한국의 유튜브는 타국을 비난하고 조롱하고 자국을 찬양하는 영상들이 수억단위의 누적 조회수를 가진 채널들이 수백개 있는 나라입니다. 한국을 조심하세요.

[@도넛-d9t]

Koreans can go to Dokdo without passports.

[@Kanen53]

Koreans can't travel to the north of the Korean peninsula even if they have a passport.

[@Isl33p]

@@Kanen53 South Koreans don't need a passport to go to North Korea. We need approval from the MOU, and that's it.

[@カナダあ]

@@Kanen53what you need to go there is not a passport but a gun hahaha

[@min-kz7tm]

Now Russian can go to Crimea without passport,so it's Russian's land?

[@laughatloo3212]

@@Kanen53yes because it’s foreign land. That’s why Japanese can’t enter Dokdo without Passeport

[@johnan3398]

Korea: - Claims Dokdo via Old Maps and documents - The islands represent Korea's official independence from brutal colonial rule - Does not go the ICJ because it currently owns the rocks(de facto) and has everything to lose at ICJ Japan: - Claims the Old Maps and documents presented by Korea are fake or misinterpreted - The islands represent how Japan is being exploited after WW2 - Wants to take thinks to ICJ because it is only way to gain control over Takeshima Both: Dokdo/Takeshima extends their maritime borders, thus giving them more access to potential resources found in the waters. So there is still a slight economic gain from working these islands.

[@VISKOR051]

Actually Japan does not even recognize old maps produced domestically.

[@user-he8ui1rq6w]

자료가 진짜 조사를 많이 했다는게 느껴질정도로 풍부하네요 다른 나라들의 역사를 이렇게 열심히 찾아보시다니.. 정말 역사 탐구에 열정이 있으신 분, 만약 팀이라면 팀인 것 같네요 이모든게 상징성 때문이란것도 맞는 것 같아요 많이 찾아보셔서 지식 그 정도로 뒷받침할 수 있으니 의견도 자신있게 내시는거겠죠? 정말 멋있습니다

[@Mrs.THECOMMUNISTCHANNEL]

Japan: those are my islands S. Korea: Those are my islands China: As you can see on this old Chinese map, those are my island

[@emmanuelflores1557]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@Mrs.THECOMMUNISTCHANNEL]

@赤霞 imagine taking a joke seriously, smh

[@joonpak]

@GamerGrey林 too tiny

[@Daniel-rh7kh]

@赤霞 It is a joke man, chill

[@noodboy4633]

_british empire joined the chat_

[@hotspace6]

Some people wonder, why the Korean government is not responding to the Japanese government's ICJ complaint. If I explain the reason, I can organize it as follows. The Japanese government continues to insist on resolving the Dokdo issue through international law in the ICJ. Since the ICJ has multinational judges, and the ICJ's existence itself is an institution established to resolve disputes between countries by third parties, the Japanese government's argument for resolving disputes in the ICJ is valid. Although this ruling is not compulsory, it can face international criticism if ignored. However, the Japanese government has mistakenly pointed out the parties to the complaint. It is not Korea that excluded Dokdo from Japan's territory, but the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Republic of China, the victors of the Pacific War, which declared the exclusion of Dokdo from Japan's territory, No. 677-1, which finally confirmed it, and the San Francisco Peace Treaty, which recognizes the effectiveness of all actions under the direction of the occupation authorities during the occupation. At that time, it was completely in agreement with the Japanese government's strengthening treaty and independence, so even if it can be claimed that 'the territory was stolen because of the coercion of the strengthening treaty', the subject of the robbery was the Allies, and Korea can never be made. In other words, in order for Japan to take back Dokdo, it must file a complaint with the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Republic of China, which took it away, and change the agreement in SCAPIN 677. The problem is, however, Article 19 'd' of the San Francisco Peace Treaty states that the people of the Allied Powers cannot be held liable for any civil or criminal matters related to this. Therefore, a lawsuit cannot be filed unless Japan's independence is revoked and the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Republic of China start a war again. Initially, based on the San Francisco Peace Treaty, Japan became independent and received support from the United States and the United Kingdom, but denying it would make Japan less likely to be recognized as a member of the international community. The reason for the repeated misinterpretation of SCAPIN 677 and Article 192 'd' of the San Francisco Peace Treaty is that they are asking the wrong questions about these materials. As the order and treaty do not stipulate "Whose land does Dokdo belong to?" the right answer cannot be given, and the Japanese side induces an analogy interpretation that is absolutely taboo in the treaty interpretation of "So it's Japanese territory." The right question is "Whose territory is Dokdo not?" The right answer to this question is clearly "Dokdo is not Japanese territory." The U.N. can recommend that the ICJ resolve disputes that may jeopardize the maintenance of international peace and security, but if the Korean side deploys troops to Dokdo, it could be criticized for avoiding the conflict zone issue. Therefore, it is not good for Korea to imply a military conflict with Japan over Dokdo with an overly emotional response based on cold facts, as the sovereignty of Dokdo will not suddenly be transferred to Japan unless it goes to war with Japan, at least immediately. Even if Korea maintains its effective control of Dokdo and there are even more serious territorial disputes than the Dokdo issue, it is unlikely to be a matter of Korean territory effectively controlled by other countries. Japan, which recognizes compulsory jurisdiction, calls for Korea and China to recognize its compulsory jurisdiction, but even if Seoul does, it cannot apply the compulsory jurisdiction over the Dokdo issue, as it has avoided applying it to matters prior to the date in which Tokyo recognizes it. After all, Japan's unilateral complaint over the Dokdo issue is absolutely impossible. This is why they continue to provoke Korea to agree to the complaint. The Japanese government is also aware of this. Japan, however, has not responded to China's ICJ complaint in opposition to the issue of Senkaku with China. Japan's refusal to apply the same policy as Dokdo means Tokyo's complaint itself is merely a means of provocation. As long as Korea has effective control of Dokdo, it is not desirable to cause serious disputes by overly sensitive and emotional responses. Making Dokdo recognize as a conflict zone among global villagers is Japanese government's strategy in itself. Some argue that 'Korea will naturally win the ICJ because it is natural, and will the controversy over Dokdo disappear?' However, with that logic, Japan wants Korea to comply with the ICJ complaint. Once you agree to the ICJ complaint, you are acknowledging that Dokdo is a disputed area and may become Japanese territory depending on the outcome of the trial. Even if Japan claims Ulleungdo as its territory beyond Dokdo, just as Korea has no reason to go to the ICJ to determine whether it is Japanese territory, just as Ulleungdo is clearly Korean territory, Dokdo is the same. Above all, there is no guarantee that Japan will accept the results and give up its claims over Dokdo as there has already been a precedent of ignoring the ICJ's rulings and orders, even if Korea wins. In fact, Japan has already shown a direct rejection of the ICJ's ruling by withdrawing from the IWC, an international organization, and deciding to catch whales in response to the ICJ's ruling and order prohibiting Japanese whaling. I've spoken a lot. Take your time to look at this and think about it. Thank you.

[@boldblazervids]

There is actually one source of fresh water that was found on the islands. Also there was technically a permanent population on the islands for some years consisting of an elderly couple

[@CivilWarWeekByWeek]

Big fan of rocks personally

[@nicoislazy]

I’m more of a boulder guy myself, pebbles are a maybe

[@jeaniusedits6094]

40th like

[@리아-k4e9x]

Not a rock, it's island. It has nation, Korea. Just want leave Dokdo alone😭

[@tr_oesolder5462]

Just like the uk

[@pedropedrohan102]

I'm a big fan of the rock

[@FredoRockwell]

Really enjoyed this! Thanks for explaining sick a complex issue in such an entertaining way!!

[@fcwgsvfmjbgq3214]

We are Korean🇰🇷Dokdo is japan🇰🇷🌷🇰🇷🌷🇰🇷🌷🇰🇷🌷🇰🇷🌷🇰🇷

[@Respectguy-cp7du]

@@fcwgsvfmjbgq3214 He is Japanese

[@정의는이긴다-x3y]

다케시마를 돌려주세요

[@shp1908bv0-ik]

@@정의는이긴다-x3y 네 안돌려줍니다. 아니지, 안 줍니다

[@shp1908bv0-ik]

안녕하세요~ 한국인입니다. (번역하기 쉬운 말투를 사용하여 한국어가 자연스럽지 않을 수 있습니다.) 독도는 명백히 한국의 땅입니다. 지금부터 제가 독도가 한국 땅인 이유와 일본 측이 주장하는 근거를 반박해보도록 하겠습니다. (이 글에 수정사항이 있어 2022년 3월 12일 기준으로 수정하였습니다) 첫번째로, 지리적인 이유입니다. 맞습니다. 한국 본토와 독도 사이의 거리는 216.8km이고 일본 본토와 독도 사이의 거리는 212km로 더 가깝습니다. 만약 당신이 이래서 독도가 일본 땅이라고 생각했다면, 당신은 멍청한 생각을 한 것입니다 독도는 한국의 섬인 울릉도와 87km 떨어져있고, 일본의 섬인 오키제도와 158km 떨어져있어 한국 땅입니다. 애초에 독도와 가장 가까운 섬이랑과의 거리를 측정해야하는데, 일본 정부에서 어설프게 진실된 자료로 사람들을 속이니 한숨이 쉬어지는군요. 둘째로, -신라 시대 때, -1900년대, -1906년 3월 29일, -1520년, -18세기 후반, , -프랑스 지리학자 '당빌"이 제작함 에서 우산도(오래 전 한국이 사용하였던 독도의 명칭)는 한국의 영토라고 증명하였습니다. 셋째로, 일본이 독도가 한국 땅임을 인정한 자료들입니다. 1667년, 일본이 독도를 처음 알게되어 적은 문헌인 에서 ''은주는 북해 가운데에 있는데 오키섬이라고 한다. 술해 사이를 두낮 한밤가면 마츠시마가 있다. 또 한낮거리에서 독도(다케시마)가 있다. 이 두섬에는 사람이 살지 않는데 고려를 보는 것이 마치 운주에러 은주로 보내는 것 같다. 그러므로 일본의 건지는 이주를 끝으로 삼는다'' 라고 적혀있습니다. 무슨 의미냐고요? 쉽게 말해 일본의 북서쪽 경계를 오키섬(이주)으로 삼는다는 말입니다. 여기서 '이주'는 나고야 대학의 교수인 이케우치 사토시 교수가 오키섬을 가리킨다고 논문을 발표했고 현재 아무도 이를 반박한 사람은 나오지 않고 있다고 합니다. 즉, 일본은 독도를 처음부터 자신의 땅이 아니라고 인정했습니다. 이뿐만 아니라 일본은 -메이지 정권이 1877년 3월 29일 독도가 한국 영토임을 인정하였습니다. -1695년 12월 일본 막부에서 울릉도와 독도가 돗토리번 소속이 아니라고 하여, 일본 어부들에게 고기잡이를 못하게 하였습니다. -8세기, -1962, -1877, -1821, , , -1655 등 공식 지도에 독도와 울릉도가 포함되어 있지 않습니다. 그리고 일본은 에 독도가 있다고 주장하는데, 이건 정부가 만든게 아니라 나가쿠보 세키스이가 개인적으로 만든건 아시죠? 심지어 는 위도 경도마저 엉터리인 지도입니다. 또한 일본이 우기고 있는 에서 대놓고 일본이 독도를 부를 때 사용했던 죽도와 송도라는 명칭으로 독도가 한국의 영토 색과 같은색으로 색칠되어 있습니다. 네번째 이유입니다. 1945년 7월 26일, 포츠담 선언 내용입니다. 이 선언에서는, 독도가 포함되어 있지 않았습니다. 1946년 1월 29일, 연합국총사령부 지침의 내용입니다. 일본은 혼슈, 규슈, 홋카이도, 시코쿠와 인접한 약 1000개의 섬들을 일본이 통치할 수 있다고 정하였지만, 울릉도와, 독도, 제주도는 일본 영토에서 제외한다고 명시되어 있습니다. 다섯째로 한국은 512년부터 우산국이라는 나라를 이사부가 정벌하여 합법적으로 실효지배를 하고있었습니다. 그러다가 한국은 그 곳에 살고있던 주민들의 세금을 걷기 힘들다는 이유로 독도에 빨리 나와라고 했죠. 이는 조선 조정이 시행했던 쇄한 정책입니다. 하지만 17세기 중반이 되어서야 독도를 제대로 안 일본은 이 상황도 모르면서 이 곳이 무주지라고 우기는 것이죠. 이는 삼국사기에 기록되어있는 내용이랍니다. '세종실록지리지에도 독도가 한국 땅이다'...... 등등 훨씬 많은 근거들 입니다. 그러면 이제 일본측의 근거도 살펴봐야 할 때이지요?? 1. 대한민국 영토는 대한민국 국민이라면 자유롭게 방문할 수 있어야하는데, 독도는 한국인이 접근 불가능한 섬입니다. →한국이 독도를 천연 기념물로 지정해 놓았는데 어떻게 방문합니까?? 2. 울릉군청에는 독도의 공시지가 없습니다. →현재, 공시지가를 발표하고 있습니다. 또한, 울릉도 심흥택의 보고서에 의하면 이미 100여년 전부터 확실하게 울릉도에 속한 섬이라도 했습니다. 3. 시마네현이 독도를 일본 영토에 편입하기 이전에 일본 어민이 독도를 경영하고 있었습니다. →사실에 맞지 않는 이야기입니다. 위에 설명드린 자료로 설명 가능합니다. 또한, 시마네현이 출처가 불분명해 국제적인 효력이 없는 건 아시고 계시죠? 4. 사람이 살지 않는 땅인 독도를 먼저 영토에 편입시켜 세상에 알린 것은 일본이므로 선점권에 의해 국제법상으로 독도는 일본의 영토입니다. →러일 전쟁 때, 일본이 침탈하여 일본 어민들이 독도에 들어올 수 있도록 한 것은 사실이나, 일본 영토로 편입시킨다는 조항은 없었습니다. 정확히는 몇 개의 조건을 빠뜨렸습니다.) 5. 센프란시스크 조약에 의하여 독도는 일본땅입니다. → 미국은 여러차례 끝에 결국 독도를 한국과 일본 모두에게 독도를 편입시키지 않았기에 오히려 독도가 일본 땅이 아님을 인정하는 한국측의 증거가 될 수 있습니다. 제677호 제3항을 제대로 읽어보시지요. 6. 태정관 지령에는 독도라고 정확히 적혀있지 않습니다. 한국측이 문서를 왜곡하여 읽은 것입니다. →누가 왜곡을 한 것입니까? 초안을 수정한 결과 최종본에서 독도의 표기가 달라진 것을 보아 이가 독도를 명시한다는 것을 인정하는 결과를 낳았습니다. (외1도) 7. 왜 한국이 ICJ에 나오지 않을까요? → 일본이 너무 멍청해서 한국이 국제법을 위반했다고 주장하는 것이다. 한국은 이에 가입할 때 다른나라와 달리 양측이 모두 ICJ에 찬성할 때에만 재판이 열린다. 즉, 한국으로서 구지 이런 위험을 감수할 필요없기 때문에 재판을 열지 않는 것이다. 제발 한국의 입장부터 똑바로 읽어보았으면 좋겠다. 사실 독도가 한국 땅인 이유는 이보다도 훨씬 많을 것입니다. 저는 독도가 일본 땅이라는 주장은 명백히 틀렸다는 것을 알려주고 싶었습니다. 아시다시피 일본은 한국의 영토를 많이 빼앗았고, 한국의 문화유산도 많이 없앴습니다. 대표적으로, 대마도는 원래 조선(한국)의 땅이었습니다. 저도 대마도에 대해서는 잘 모르지만, 대충 127가지의 근거가 있다고 합니다. 또한 석유 매장량이 6000조원 (사우디아라비아의 10배로 추정) 가까이 되는 7광구마저도 대륙봉을 기준으로 하였던 영토 기준이 일본에게 유리한 국제법으로 바뀌어 7광구의 90%를 일본이 차지하게 되는 어처구니 없는 상황도 벌어지고 있습니다. 뭐, 일본이 평상시에 행동하는 것 처럼, 국제법이 바뀌고 난 뒤부터 한국과 개발을 하지 않고 일본이 그 땅을 다 소유하려는 욕심 때문에, 조항을 어기면서까지 이기적인 행보를 보이고 있습니다. (조항에 'shall'이라는 단어에 의해 위법이라고 하네요) 독도가 한국 땅임을 일본이 인정하는 날이 왔으면 좋겠습니다. 제발 한국을 그만 괴롭혀주면 좋겠습니다. 그리고 일본이 뇌물을 얼마나 먹였는지 구글이 다케시마라고 쓰고 일본해라고 표기를 하는데, 정말 일본이라는 나라가 양심이 있었으면 좋겠다라는 생각 밖에안듭니다. 또한, 일본은 중국과 러시아 등에도 땅을 우기고 있습니다. 뺏으면 좋고 실패해도 잃을게 없다는 논리인지 이해가 안가네요. 제발 착하게 사십시오.

[@sibalshke]

In the past, Japan wrote that Dokdo had nothing to do with Japan according to the Taejeonggwan directive it made. This is evidence that Japan recognized Dokdo as Korean land, and it is true that Dokdo is close to Korea, and Japan had no relationship with Japan before 1905. It has never been said that Dokdo is Japanese land, but Japan suddenly made an unreasonable claim that Dokdo was an island without an original owner and that it was Japan's inherent territory. The reason Dokdo is Japanese territory is because of the natural resources on Dokdo.

[@c_kenma7307]

In response, the Japanese side made this objection. The "Takeshima" in "Takeshima and One Other Island," which was declared irrelevant to Japan in an 1877 Dajokan directive, is not the current Takeshima/Dokdo, but the fictional "Argonaut Island" that was created by a discrepancy in longitude and latitude when French and British navigators surveyed Ulleungdo, and since "One Other Island" refers to Ulleungdo, Japan has not given up the "other one island". (I am using a machine translation so my English may be flawed)

[@alicekim2505]

You make no sense buddy.

[@sibalshke]

@@c_kenma7307 If Japan's claim had been recognized, Takeshima would have been managed by Japan by now. However, Takeshima is currently managed by Korea. This means that Korea's claim, not Japan's claim, was recognized. If Korea has illegally occupied it, Japan or another country's claim has been acknowledged. Government agencies must have also taken action. And when we asked Japanese people if they knew where Takeshima is, most of them responded that they did not know. I think it is wrong to just claim that an island whose location is unknown is their territory.

[@oceanrocks]

@@c_kenma7307 “According to the foundation, dozens of ancient maps designating Dokdo as Korean were published by the Japanese government in 1894, 1903, 1929 and 1941. Japan has insisted that Dokdo was incorporated into Japanese territory through a 1905 notice by Shimane Prefecture. But a number of official Japanese maps produced in 1908, 1925, 1938 and 1951 still show Dokdo as not belonging to Japan. In addition, about 100 old Western maps and another 100 ancient Korean maps define Dokdo as Korean territory, the foundation noted.”

[@prohightension2000]

@@c_kenma7307 dude the word "Takeshima" itself came from the koreans. Takeshima means bamboo island and that is what some koreans used to call Ulleungdo, which is right next to dokdo. You know why no one called dokdo as "bamboo island"? because there's no bamboo on Dokdo. It's funny that you even say that it could be a fictional island because that name actually existed lol.

[@haskar-by5pl]

Korea and Japan are developed, wealthy countries. However, their territory is too small compared to their national power. They will pay any price except war if they can get land, even it is the desert or permafrost.

[@Bloodrop-yay]

The Korean Taegukgi has changed four times, so it was different in color than it is now. Thank you for expressing this so well.

[@Stealingcultureisadisgrace.]

但都是从中国的太极和八卦上改的 还改成了凶卦😂😂😂，别不承认这是事实

[@이름성-o3b]

@@Stealingcultureisadisgrace. G.C.D.C

[@wurnoswursis6757]

​@@Stealingcultureisadisgrace. ㅋ라고 중국인이 주장하네

[@themoonintheclouds7199]

​@@Stealingcultureisadisgrace.China claims everything is made in China except COVID-19 🤣

[@부계임]

​@@Stealingcultureisadisgrace.free taiwan🇹🇼 your social credit : -999999😂

[@Hrjrje382]

1) Since the Three Kingdoms Sagi (512), there have been consistent references to Dokdo in Korean (Joseon) ancient literature and old maps, but Japan's Goheon and old maps did not mention Dokdo and said it was not Japanese territory. 2) The Japanese shogunate received a reply from Tottoriburn that Dokdo was not Japanese territory, and in 1696, Ahn Yong-bok of Joseon visited Oki Island in Japan and received a reply that Dokdo was Joseon territory. 3) On October 25, 1900, Emperor Gojong of the Korean Empire enacted the Korean Empire Edict No. 41, which designated Dokdo as an annexed island to Ulleungdo Island, and practically exercised the territory sovereignty of the Republic of Korea after the defeat of the Japanese Empire and liberation. Dokdo is Korean territory and not a disputed area. Takeshima is just a dream of the Japanese government

[@alicekim2505]

I love how this comment accurately states the history and the current ownership of Dokdo.

[@井上陽瑛]

People from all countries only believe in information that is beneficial to their country. you are one of them

[@doge-of-venice]

A very well-made, entertaining, and informative video for the size of your channel. Hope you get the following you deserve.

[@user-twlelweefw]

Not dokdo takeshima is japan island. japan occupy korea and there is a definite document. kzbin.info/www/bejne/gYGtgXZmiJqVrs0

[@brezelkaiser]

"Are you playing with your rocks again, Hank?" "Jesus Christ Marie! They're Minerals!"

[@brucehur2051]

apan is evil country! JAPANESE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS STILL VISITS SHRINE FOR THE WW2 DEAD SOLDIERS ANNUALLY! GERMANS DON'T GO VISIT ADOLF HITLER'S GRAVE AND PRAY FOR HIM......

[@윤동희-d2e]

Gigachad

[@Kaybossboi]

Let’s be honest East Asian countries don’t really have good view of each other due geopolitics, historical events and national pride Edit: well I created a war in the comment section 😂

[@FOLIPE]

@赤霞 East Asia isn't a continent though and it isn't holding them back or anything. I think East Asia will become more relevant as china rises but as other parts of the world will also grow we'll never see total hegemony like the US and Europe had in the past anymore

[@noodboy4633]

@赤霞 you mean subcontinent

[@storm_kimchi]

인정

[@pnwqufaktmdjnum4105]

Iam Korean🇰🇷Dokdo is japan🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷

[@boycottsouthkorea5271]

Why should South Korea continue to play the heroic victim, using the comfort women as a political weapon? The world will come to understand little by little.

[@doit185]

Anyway, the obvious thing is that Dokdo is under the administration of South Korea. There are some governmental facilities in thay island. And there is a platoon of South Korean police in that island. On the other hand, Japan doesn't have the administrative control over that island. Even the sky over Dokdo/Takeshima is in KADIZ(Korea Air Defense and Identification Zone). So to speak briefly, the island called 'Dokdo' is under the South Korea's de-facto territorial region

[@썬더인데여]

Dokdo has been Korean territory since the Three Kingdoms period. The Three Kingdoms period was from -58 to 658, during which Silla occupied Usan-guk (now Dokdo), and Japan insisted that Dokdo was its land since 1905 after the Russo-Japanese War.

[@anubhatyagi4410]

Recently found out your channel liked it and even subscribed pls make more videos like these

[@vibinseal]

So all the promblems came from Japanese's impirical action...right?

[@こんにちは-h8n]

no

[@vibinseal]

@@こんにちは-h8n ?

[@나는세상에서제일-f5s]

Yes

[@Z-f7p-i95]

뭐라는거야

[@-up9306]

@@Z-f7p-i95 뭘 뭐라는거라니 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 다팩트고 우리쉴드쳐주고 있는데

[@UnitedAirlines-v8q]

As South Korean, I think Dokdo is legal territory of Korea. Like the 900s-1400s Korean records said. and some Koreans fought pirates to defend Dokdo.

[@あああ-o8d]

I am Japanese. First of all, I would like to say that there is often cursing between Japanese and Koreans happening on the internet, which is very sad, and I myself would like to get along with the Korean people. I don't know much about what you are talking about from 900-1400, so I won't mention it, but at least after 1618 Japan went to Takeshima (Dokdo) and fished there! Well, this is not direct evidence from the Japanese side. To cut to the chase, some others have commented that the Allied General Headquarters guidelines clearly state the abandonment of Dokdo, which in itself is correct. However, it must be noted that it is only a guideline and not a treaty. In fact, the Allied Powers did not include Dokdo in the islands that Japan had to renounce in the subsequent San Francisco Peace Treaty. In response, the Korean side submitted a written opinion, which was not accepted. (From the Ministry of Foreign Affairs pages). Because of these facts, Japanese people believe that Takeshima belongs to Japan.

[@Fedor2222-z3h]

Despite the fact that the MacArthur Line had already been drawn in the Treaty of San Francisco, South Korea arbitrarily included Takeshima in a line called the Syngman Rhee Line and began to claim that it belonged to its own country. It is also listed in diplomatic documents published by the US government.

[@user-handsomeflower]

당신 역사적 증거도 보지 않고 말하는거지?

[@yantom701]

@@user-handsomeflower Just bring it to ICJ. I know a thief won't go to Court.

[@선풍기볶음]

@@yantom701 If Korea suddenly claims ownership of Tsushima and bring it to ICJ, will Japan agree? International trials are conducted when a territorial dispute 'exists'.

[@jeanmiyu6904]

@@선풍기볶음 It's a typical childish hypothesis. JPN would have accepted the court battle at ICJ if Kor's territorial claim was issued when Tsushima island became a part of territory of JPN. Meanwhile JPN has been issuing the claim since SKor stole our island in 1954. You are just found out that you were pretending to know everything related to territorial claim. lol

[@yantom701]

@@선풍기볶음 Japan accepted ICJ Article 36-2 Study more about the ICJ system. So you won't ask this stupid question. Dokdo is under illegal occupation by Korean forces. Totally different circumstance. You should feel shame for saying this school kid's theory for a diplomatic issue. anyway, don't scare to go to ICJ and Justice.

[@뿌에엥-i4d]

The meaning of the name of Takeshima lsland is Bamboo Island dut dokdo lsland, meaning of the name is stone island On October 25, 1900, Dokdo was officially declared to be incorporated into Gyeonggi Province along with Ulleungdo Island under the order of the king of the Joseon Kingdom (then the Korean Empire) Bamboo does not grow on Dokdo

[@케밥-kr]

Before Japan claimed sovereignty in 1905, Gojong, the emperor of the Korean Empire, first claimed sovereignty, and before that, Japan's Taejeonggwan first warned people not to enter Dokdo carelessly as it was Korean territory.

[@joshh8022]

thank you. I love your videos and watch them during lunch break!

[@LeonidasArg2021]

Koreans and Japanese: fighting for a bunch of rock collection Me, an Argentinian: First time?

[@KGB-SOVIET]

lol i acttually laughed but i think its really important situations

[@_Aspartes]

Falklands flashback

[@TriplePistol]

Well, Since later Japan discovered Dokdo/Lian Court, Both Fishman fought each other.

[@네오리]

There are many people around the world who think Dokdo is a disputed area. However, this is an incorrect fact and it is not Japanese territory. Dokdo has been consistently mentioned in Korean records since 512 AD, and some Japanese maps also showed Dokdo as Korean territory. In 1696, An Yong-bok of Joseon received a reply from the Japanese government that Dokdo was Korean territory. , Article 41 of the Korean Imperial Edict, etc., and above all, the fact that Korean soldiers are currently on Dokdo and the Taegeukgi (Korean national flag) is displayed, it can be proven that Dokdo is Korean land. Japan, let's stop creating false history. Do not covet another country’s land without proof

[@화이팅-t2q]

According to your logic, there are no disputed territories in the world. Every country has its own reason why certain land is theirs.

[@요겉그릭]

Dokdo is a korean island. The word Takeshima means island with bamboos. But they are none. Originally Ulleungdo was called takeshima . Ppl in korea used to call dokdo 죽도 which means big island. But 죽도 can be also translated to be bamboo island(it doesn’t mean that) which means japan named the island after the original korean name which also means that korea found it first

[@dl-cu5tc]

You're right! Because there isn't any bamboo in Dokdo. That name Takeshima is just wrong translation of Korean island.

[@Costreible]

Korea has never had any territorial disputes, and Dokdo is clearly Korean land. Please correct the part where there is a dispute.

[@Charlisimo123]

Funny how the Japanese told the United Koreas in the Olympics of PyeongChang 2018 to spilt cause their flag had Dokdo in it, but they are doing the same shit in the current Olympics with them “owning” those rocks while saying, “Please no political flags or banners”. Hypocrites. Anyways, nice video.

[@protestantwarrior1516]

“Measured by the standards of modern civilization, Japan would be like a boy of twelve as compared with the [Anglo-Saxon] development of 45 years" - General MacArthur

[@nayeemhaider8367]

@@protestantwarrior1516 That guy was illiterate then. The Anglo Saxons arrived in Britain around the 500s while Japanese were already forming Kingdoms by at least the 200-200 AD time period. The Japanese monarchy is older than any other monarchy in the world

[@protestantwarrior1516]

@@nayeemhaider8367 Japanese monarchy is just a Korean Baekje substrate, nothing more. Japan did not have a bronze age, so they relied on bronze and iron from Korea during Yayoi Korean invasion. Japanese did not have any civilizaiton before 500s. Nihon Shoki is not a reliable source.

[@schneejacques3502]

@@nayeemhaider8367 Japan only has the oldest 2,600 old imperial family according to their mythical accounts. It is total bullshit because they have no proof of the emperors they claim existed before the 6th century AD. The Chinese wrote Records of the Three Kingdoms, guess what, the names of the Japanese chiefs or kings in the Records of the three kingdoms do not match up with the names of fake Japanese emperors claimed to have existed in that era by the 8th century Nihon Shoki and Kojiki which were the first books written in Japan. The Japanese did not use the title of Emperor (tenno) before the 6th century AD, they only used the title of King to refer to their fake kings since their first fake Emperor Jimmu but after borrowing the title of Emperor from China, they retroactively applied Emperor to all of their fake kings since Emperor Jimmy. The title Tenno (Tianddi) was derived from Daoist influence in Tang dynasty China. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Records_of_the_Three_Kingdoms#Legacy en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihon_Shoki en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kojiki Japan had no literacy or writing before the 5th centuy AD. The only written objects they had were Chinese seals given to them by the Han Emperor like the seal where the Han Emperor of China called the Japanese tribal chief a King of the midget (dwarf) slaves. This is not trolling that's what it says. The Japanese chief accepted this seal as a sign he was a vassal of Han China. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_of_Na_gold_seal 漢委奴國王 Japan still officially promotes the lie that Jimmu is descended from the Sun goddess Amaterasu and reigned since 660 BC. There's an official holiday for it. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Foundation_Day www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/topics/reference/japanese-monarchy/

[@swiftkill8254]

@@schneejacques3502 Great post! Let the truth be truly known. Time to bring some parity into all this Nippon romanticizing and worshipping.

[@아-w5t]

territorial conflict Korea-Japan: Dokdo Russia-Japan: Kuril Islands China-Japan: Senkaku Islands Just so you can tell who lies professionally

[@alicekim2505]

lol

[@OneandonlyCarp]

but again, China has been having disputes over land with almost every neighboring country.

[@ruiwenchai5654]

@@OneandonlyCarpBy your logic, Russia as well. South Ossetia, Crimea, etc.

[@rvjmt155]

Takeshima is Japanese territory Rusk note of 1951 With respect to request of the Korean Government that Article 2(a) of the draft be revised to provide that Japan "confirms that it renounced on August 9, 1945, all right, title and claim to Korea and the islands which were part of Korea prior to its annexation by Japan, including the islands Quelpart, Port Hamilton, Dagelet, Dokdo and Parangdo," the United States Government regrets that it is unable to concur in this proposed amendment. The United States Government does not feel that the Treaty should adopt the theory that Japan's acceptance of the Potsdam Declaration on August 9, 1945 constituted a formal or final renunciation of sovereignty by Japan over the areas dealt with in the Declaration. As regards the island of Dokdo, otherwise known as Takeshima or Liancourt Rocks, this normally uninhabited rock formation was according to our information never treated as part of Korea and, since about 1905, has been under the jurisdiction of the Oki Islands Branch Office of Shimane Prefecture of Japan. The island does not appear ever before to have been claimed by Korea. It is understood that the Korean Government's request that "Parangdo" be included among the islands named in the treaty as having been renounced by Japan has been withdrawn.

[@국힘당민주당최악]

독도에는 대나무가 없다 그리고 독도 강치 학살 한 일본

[@미녀-m5q]

외국인들까지도 일본땅인 다케시마를 한국땅이라고 우기니 설명하겠다 다케시마가 한국땅이 아닌 13가지 이유 1. 예전에 정광태라는 개그맨출신 가수가 "독도는 우리땅" 이라는 노래를 발표했다. 그러나 한국 정부는 이를 금지곡으로 지정했다. 그리고 무슨 이유인지 몰라도 아직도 정광태씨는 일본 비자를 발급받지 못하고 있다. (이제는 금지곡에서 풀렸지만 일본이 항의를 하면 가끔씩 방송에서 자취를 감추고 있다.) 한국측 주장:일본 때문에 바꿨다 진정으로 한국땅이라면 일본 때문에 바꿀 이유가 뭐가 있지? 2. 2000년 새해 맞이 해돋이 행사는 각 나라의 가장 동쪽끝 영토에서 실시 된다. 그러나 한국은 가장 동쪽 끝 영토인 다케시마를 팽개치고 울산광역시의 간절곶 등대에서 새천년 해돋이 채화식을 거행했다. (실제로 방송국은 독도에서 행사를 거행하려 했으나 그 뜻을 이룰 수 없었다고 한다. 왜??) 3.예전에는 다케시마는 일반 한국인이 접근할 수 없는 섬으로 지정되어있다. 일반인이 독도에 들어가려면 외교통상부의 허가를 받아야 하는 데 요청시 대부분 반려되고 있다. (천연기념물보호 때문이라는데 언제부터 외교통상부가 천연기념물을관리했나?!) 4. 일본은 독도를 일본 영토와 가장 가까운 시마네현 은기군 오개촌에 편입 시켜 놓았으며 독도에 일본인 호적까지 등록시켜 놓았다. 게다가 일본 시마네현 청사와 경찰청 정문 앞에는 죽도는 우리(일본) 고유 영토입니다’ 라고 적힌 대형 입간판과 시마네현 곳곳에는 죽도는 우리(일본)땅’이라는 현수막까지 설치되어 있다. 하지만 한국의 어느 청사에도 독도가 한국땅이라는 입간판이나 현수막은 없다. 5. 일본 시마네현 관청은 독도의 공시지가까지 마련해 놓았으나, 울릉군청 에는 독도의 공시지가 따위는 없다. 6. 1999년 말 경북도지사는 독도의 해경을 위로 방문하려고 정부에 출장신청을 했으나 고위층의 반대로 출장은 무산되었다. (일반인은 물론 독도를 관할하는 책임자인 경북도지사도 지맘대로 못간다.) 7. 일본은 1996년 신어업협정을 발효시키며 배타적 경제 수역내에 독도를 포함시켰다. 하지만 한국의 애걸복걸로 독도는 중간수역으로 정해 졌다. 하지만 한국 어선이 조업시 독도에 정박하는 것은 발포를 무릅써야 한다. (독도에 있는 경찰은 일본 경찰인가?) 8. 1996년 한 홍콩의 경제주간지가 아시아 기업인들 상대로 "독도 영유권"관련 설문조사를 실시 하였는데, 말레이시아 기업인들은 66.7%, 호주 58.8%, 인도 55.6% 필리핀의 기업인들은 54.5%가 독도를 "일본의 영토"로 인지하고 있다고 발표하였다. (전 세계에서 우리나라만 독도를 한국땅으로 알고 있는 것인가?) 9. 김종필 전 자민련총재가 62년 한,일 국교정상화교섭 당시 독도 폭파를 일본측에 제안했던 사실이 확인됐다고 요미우리 신문이 워싱턴발 지지 통신을 인용，보도했다? 이 신문은 최근 해금된 미 외교 문서에 한국측 수석대표였던 김종필 당시 중앙정보부장이 독도폭파를 제안했으나 일본 측이 거부했다고 밝혔다. (한국은 자신들의 영토가 아니므로 쉽게 폭파 하자는 얘기를 할 수 있지만 일본은 자신들의 영토를 폭파할 수 없어서 거부했다는 식으로 해석함.) 10. "정부는 유엔 해양법 협약 관련규정에 따라 현재 독도를 EEZ 를 가지지 않는 '암석'으로 해석하고 있다." (98. 11. 8, 국회 대 정부질의시 국무총리 답변) 하지만 일본은 독도가 자신들의 영토이지만 한국이 불법 점유하고 있는 것이라고 판단하고 있다. (0.23평방 km 짜 리 암석도있나? 암석치고는 꽤 크군.) 11. 남지나해의 남사군도는 필리핀, 중국, 베트남, 브루나이, 대만 등 여러나라 간의 분쟁이 일고 있는 지역이다. 몇년 전 중국 해군이 그 중의 한 산호초에 가건물을 지었다. 그 산호초는 필리핀이 자기 영토라고 주장하는 곳이다. 전임 라모스 정권 때는 별 소용도 없는 외교적 항의로만 일관했다. 그러니 중국은 끄떡도 할 리 없었다. 그러나 에스트라다가 새로운 대통령이 된 후에 필리핀 해병대를 보내서 중국이 지은 가건물을 통쾌하게도 폭파해 버렸다. 중국과의 전쟁을 각오한 행동이었다. 그러자 지레 찔린 중국은 필리핀에 쳐들어가기는 커녕, 여태 자기 영토, 영해라고 주장하던 자세를 바꾸어 공동관리라는 선까지 후퇴 했다. (일본이 언젠가 독도 수비대 숙소를 폭파하러 올 것이다.) 12. 현재 독도에는 독도 수비대라는 명칭의 전투경찰이 있다. 국방은 군인이 지키고 치안을 담당하는게 경찰이다. 독도는 당연히 전경 대신 해병대가 지키고 있어야 한다. 일본은 독도주변 영해와 영공에 일본의 군함과 선박, 항공기를 자주 출몰시키고 있다. 한국은 독도를 경찰이 담당하지만 일본은 자위대라는 군대가 담당하고 있는 것이다. 한국측 주장:독도는 분쟁지역이 아니므로 '분쟁지역'을 지키는 군인이 아니라 '치안구역'을 지키는 경찰이 배치되었다. 반박:분쟁지역이란 말썽을 일으켜 시끄럽게 다투는 지역을 말하는데 다케시마를 한국에서는 한국꺼라고 우기고 일본에서는 일본땅이라는 사실을 말하고 있으니 분쟁지역이다 13. 동해바다 명칭이 일제시대 이전에는 "Mer de coree" 등 "조선해"의 영문명칭으로 널리 알려지다가 일제 시대 이후 전세계의 대부분의 지도에선 "Sea of Japan"이라고 표기하고 있다. 이에 한국 정부는 한국해라고 항의하기는커녕, 맑고 푸른바다라는 뜻의 청해로 표기하자고 하고 있지만 일본은 이를 거절하고 있다. (지도에 일본해에 떠있는 섬을 한국 영토라고 한다면 전 세계 누가 믿어 주겠는가?) 한국측 주장:대마도도 일본땅이지만 대한해협에 속한다 반박:아직 확실하게 판명이 안난 다케시마와 달리 대마도가 일본땅이라는 것은 확실한 사실이기 때문에 대한해협에 속한다고해도 일본땅이라고 볼수밖에 없고 일본땅이 대한해협에 속한다는것은 말이 안되는 소리기 때문에 대한해협은 가짜명칭이고 쓰시마해협이 진짜 명칭이라고 볼수밖에 없다 14. 한국인들은 자신들의 영토라면서도 국제재판에 가지 않는다 한국측 주장:국제재판에 가는건 분쟁지역이라는걸 인정하는것이기 때문에 안가는 것이다 반박:아까도 말했드시 분쟁지역이란 말썽을 일으켜 시끄럽게 다투는 지역을 말하는데 다케시마를 한국에서는 한국꺼라고 우기고 일본에서는 일본땅이라는 사실을 말하고 있으니 분쟁지역이다 15. 샌프란시스코 조약에 일본이 포기해야할 영토에 다케시마는 존재하지 않는다 16. 한국인들은 다케시마에 온 일본인들을 죽였던 적이 있다 범죄를 저지르면서까지 한국땅이라고 주장하는 자들은 악당이나 다름없고 악당이 주장하는 말은 당연히 사실이라고 볼수도 없으며 한국인들은 일본땅이라고 생각하는 사람들에게 심한 욕설과 도배를 했다 하지만 일본인들은 그렇지않다 한국인들이 자꾸 한국땅이라고 반말을 하고 폭력을 행사하고 폭주를 해도 친절하게 알려준다 다케시마가 한국땅인 이유 다케시마는 일본보다 한국에 더 가깝다 반박:거리로 판단하는것 자체가 이상한것이다. 괌은 미국 영토이지만 일본에 가까우니 일본의 영토라고 하는것과 같다 일본인들은 다케시마가 어딘지 모른다 반박:다케시마가 어디있는지 아는 일본인들은 널리고널렸다 한국인들이 일본인들에게 인터뷰한 결과 일본인들 대부분이 정확하게 위치를 알고있었으나 위치를 아는 일본인들의 인터뷰만 공개하지않고 모르겠다는 사람들만 골라서 영상을 공개한것이다 그리고 애초에 이건 다케시마가 한국땅이라는 이유가 될수 없다 실제로 다케시마가 어디있는지 모르는 한국인도 존재한다

[@Freeman프리맨]

A book that compiled information on Joseon's territory in the 1300s was made at the order of King Sejong, who was the king at the time, and there is a record of Dokdo and Joseon's territory. Joseon knew the history from the Silla period and recognized it as Joseon's territory along with Ulleungdo Island. And later, to counter Japanese influence, the emperor ordered it in 1905 and officially recorded it as a territorial notation under modern international law along with the official name Dokdo. However, as the video explained, this period was ignored by the international community because Japan was colonizing Joseon, and eventually it continued to this day.

[@sayfridge]

The comment section is very peaceful

[@unkown__434]

Lmao

[@alicekim2505]

Dokdo is controlled and governed by the Republic of Korea. Period.

[@Chalow0512]

I saw various comments from both Korea and Japan, and it seems that koreans want dokdo, but japanese want territorial waters more than this island. also koreans kept mentioning the historical record that dokdo belongs to them, but japanese did not. I think koreans are more interested in this issue than japanese cuz dokdo is korean territory.

[@yantom701]

Japan is more rational than Korea. Sovereignty is a modern concept it is irrelevant to history. but Korea still can assert and demands sovereignty at the ICJ, not an illegal occupation by force. Also, So-called historical records are not accurate and have many contradictions. none of them showed the name of 独島 nor the correct location of those islands. The most critical thing to Korean's assertion is the SF treaty. Korean must understand that International society has common sense as the thief detests a court.

[@YA-fi3ng]

Korean historical references are wrong in the first place. And I find it frightening that Koreans still support dictator Syngman Rhee. Although Syngman Rhee killed many Koreans, many Koreans support him. Dictator Syngman Rhee is the cause of this Takeshima-Dokdo issue.

[@Chalow0512]

​@@YA-fi3ng I don't know why it suddenly changes to another topic, but it's wrong for Koreans to support Rhee Syngman. I know that Koreans have a bad opinion of Syngman. I've never heard Koreans support Syngman Rhee. I'm sure the Koreans you've seen are people with a few opinions.

[@Chalow0512]

​@@yantom701 anyway. Interestingly, I saw your comment in other videos. you continued to claim that dokdo is an island in Japan. but will what you say to be the exact basis? No, there is no data to deny historical data proved by Koreans. I don't know why you think dokdo belongs to Japan because you're neither Korean nor Japanese. What is certain is that there is no obvious reason for the Japanese opinion.

[@YA-fi3ng]

@@Chalow0512 Do you know "Syngman Rhee Line"? This “Syngman Rhee line” was the beginning of the Takeshima-Dokdo territorial dispute, and also the beginning of the Japan-Korea dispute that continues to this day. Syngman Rhee's anti-Japanese ideology has been passed down to the present day Koreans, and Takeshima (Dokdo) is a symbolic existence of anti-Japan. If he hadn't acted foolishly, the anti-Japan symbol wouldn't exist, and current Japan-Korea relations would be more friendly, with nothing for the US to worry about.

[@lowellfinn]

Finally after months

[@kirruk1234]

The clear reason why Dokdo is Korean territory is that Korea had the southern part of the Korean Empire's territory at the time, and the Korean Empire at that time officially announced that Dokdo was Korean territory by issuing Article 41 of the Imperial Decree of the Korean Empire in 1900, so Dokdo was Korean territory. . (Japan's official announcement of Dokdo's incorporation is Shimane Prefecture Notice No. 40, which is four years later than Korea's)

[@MrBumbo90]

Great video. Very underrated channel.

[@winter_night12]

Japan is still insist Dokdo as its own based on the history when the Republic of Korea under japanese rule. So Japan saying that Dokdo belongs to them is that they think imperialism is justified. They are still absolutely not reflecting on the war crimes that they did.

[@jsasa1861]

Not insist. Takeshima has been belonging to Japan, and Koare invaded and illegally occupying there. That is just a fact.

[@jsasa1861]

You show why Japan need not take Korea's protest about history seriously. For Korea, words like history or war crime are just a tool to justify Korea's territorial ambition.

[@DeutscherFußballMeister]

​@LOVELYMEN0207 Do you know how much money the japanese goverment uses in lobbying international facilities😂😂 of course you wouldnt 'cause you're always told lies about your country😂😂 why the hell would korea and russia go into court for their islands when it is obvious that the decision of the court would be decided by money😂😂😂😂

[@Tobi-ln9xr]

8:16 It’s interesting that you didn’t include the Tsingtao region which was a German colony in China right next to Korea. Germany also led the occupation forces after the Boxer uprising. Especially those two factors heavily challenged the closed and isolated policy of Korea.

[@Esquelan]

He also points Netherlands in Formosa(Taiwan),but it’s not in 19th century

[@forsinardfalun4177]

I understand some comments making it a bit of jokes because it may be not important to you. But it's a serious problem. Dokdo has been Korean territory since ancient ages. And Japan took it by force during Imperialism times. And now Japan should not claim Dokdo since it means Japan claims Imperialism. Germany didn't claim any territories it took during WW2, Nazi period. The reason Japan can dare claim Dokdo is because the US needed Japan as allies in Cold War. So the US kinda had closed its eyes on Japan. Please listen to the truth World :)

[@FOLIPE]

That's a lot of weird comparisons. Liancourt was claimed by Japan before their imperialist expansion, and WW2 was in the late imperialist era and the German invasions in the 40s are an entirely different matter.

[@protestantwarrior1516]

@@FOLIPE 1905 is not before imperialist expansion, that's the start of imperialist expansion.

[@forsinardfalun4177]

@@FOLIPE You misunderstood some points. Firstly I didn't claim Nazi imperialists, Nazi and Japanese Empire have done war crimes. So the point is they both did horrible things in the past. And they both invaded many countries and both are vanquished nations. But unlike Germany apologized, Japan didn't apologize. And Japan now claims a territory from one of the colonized countries. I explained about US and Japan relationship during cold war above.

[@forsinardfalun4177]

@@FOLIPE And like Philip93 said Japan was already on imperialist expansion. Dokdo was the first territory they took from Joseon while Japanese Empire was having wars with Russian Empire. Therefore Japanese Empire taking dokdo is regarded as the start of imperialist expansions.

[@Bruh-bz2et]

@@FOLIPE u heard the video at world war 2 people was taking the land from the other country its same as japanese stealing korea's territory

[@melodysheep2651]

Japan was deprived of all rights to its overseas colonies after losing World War II.

[@KenKobayashiRasmussen]

Thank you for a very objective and well made video about the issue, I have a little objection though, and this is the San Francisco Peace treaty, according to the documents available, it seems that the dispute about Liancourt Rocks was indeed on the agenda, and there was several discussions back and forth, but there was a draft of 5 different agreements, including the island and not. The final agreement did NOT include the islands, remember this was the agreement of Japan giving back what they took during the War. If the islands was not included in the official agreement that was signed (Not by any fault of the Japanese, but the western World) this means the island are still Japanese, because the whole of Korea was Japanese. Many aspects of this whole process was unfair to the koreans, because they were not there when this happened, not to any fault of the Japanese, but still not fair. I do NOT believe that (officially, on paper) that the Liancourt Rocks are Korean, but as a Japanese descendant I strongly believe that Japan as a gesture of friendship, should officially give the islands back to Korea. I do however also believe that the whole reason for Japan's anger around this, was that Korea deliberately invaded the island after the War, just to build on it (Officially illegally) if this would not have happened, I believe that the islands would have been given back to Korea a long time ago.

[@YA-fi3ng]

You seem to have a slight misunderstanding, so I'd like to point it out. The 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty was a World War II peace treaty concluded between Japan and 48 Allied nations. A peace treaty is a treaty concluded between belligerent countries declaring the end of war and the restoration of peace. The conditions for peace include the cession of territory, compensation, and the release of prisoners of war. It is natural that the South Korean government could not attend San Francisco, since South Korea was not a belligerent in World War II. South Korea is a country that was founded on August 15, 1948, and is classified as a "third country." Japan continues to insist that it did not abandon Takeshima under the San Francisco Peace Treaty. If there is an objection to the Japanese government's claim, only the 48 countries that are signatories to the treaty can file an objection, and the Republic of Korea does not have that right. The territory of the Republic of Korea was granted by Japan and the 48 Allied Powers. The Republic of Korea's armed occupation of Japan's Takeshima is an act that goes against the international order.

[@Either2923]

Hello, I am a middle school student living in Korea. First of all, thank you for proving that Dokdo is our land. Internationally, the most important factor in recognizing the territorial sovereignty of a disputed area is not “which country it was on in the past,” but “which country is in effective control (effective display, effectivités) at the time of arbitration.” Based on the standards before and after World War II. As Dokdo is under the effective control of the Republic of Korea, as of now, Dokdo’s sovereignty lies with the Republic of Korea! thank you again

[@KenKobayashiRasmussen]

@@Either2923 My dear Korean friend, neither me or the person that commented claim to know the truth, because truth is a matter of perception, but we have rules and regulation and international laws to abide by, and according to international law, The islands are Japanese, both me and the person commenting is stating this, so you have misunderstood our point. The islands are lawfully Japanese, but this does not change the fact that it was unfair and should be changed. I believe that Japan should give the island back to South Korea as a friendly gesture, and I believe that Japan would have done this already if it was not because South Korea had used this as an act of opposition after the war, Korea illegally occupied the island after the war.

[@김예강-x5u]

Hello, I am Korean. Thank you so much for making the video. In Korea, Dokdo is called a solitary island, and in Japan is called Takeshimaialand. Take means bamboo and Shimah means an island. And in Korea, bamboo is called Jukdo. (Bamboo Island = Jukdo) Why do the Japanese call a stone island without any bamboo as Takeshima (Jukdo = Bamboo Island)? In Korea, there are many islands with bamboo, so there are more than 10 islands named Jukdo.(=Bamboo island) There are also Jukdo Island next to Ulleungdo and Dokdo. Maybe the Japanese got confused when they named it. There are many old maps that Dokdo belongs to the Korean Peninsula, and they are also found in Japan. And Dokdo have their name from Korean history. The Japanese are slowly and continuously turning Dokdo into conflict zones to take it away as its value goes up. Most importantly, Korea is now the dominant country. Thank you for reading it.

[@mimorisenpai8540]

Old map pretty confusing and same many old map put it as japanese territories

[@계부-j1g]

​@@mimorisenpai8540 there are many map put it as korean

[@petarjoncic2801]

Can't wait!

[@thebarber4397]

Same

[@前田t-v2d]

I am a Japanese who is a party to this issue. And I think the most important thing is to judge from a fair perspective, that is, what the truth is. On top of that, we came to the conclusion that Dokdo is a territory of Korea. However, when I say that, I get a very high-pressure and aggressive message from a large number of Japanese. It is necessary to judge history fairly, not to think about the interests of one's own country.

[@kd5412]

Read San Francisco Peace Treaty and learn history. Only Koreans don’t know Korean history.

[@竹の里-i4o]

日本の領土です

[@TheDonner000]

Thank you so much, this brings some light to the hope that some see this problem not with emotion and politics, but with sense.

[@TheDonner000]

@@kd5412 by all means, quote me a line in the treaty of san francisco that specifically states of the sovereignty of the island. Don't forget to give the source, anything legitimate or not-skewed-by-opinions will do.

[@kd5412]

@@TheDonner000 Don’t be lazy. Read chapter II.

[@jaelala2949]

As a korean I really appreciate on your hard work trying to tell the truth

[@russelkang6390]

Bro this comment section just sparked another start to a Japan-South Korea cyberwarfare lol

[@고강현-f8k]

Thank you for the video, I saw other ones with Korea (Nokdundo,Gando..) and hoped that many people would like to have an interest on Eastern countries' relationship.

[@PoliticswithPaint]

Glad you enjoyed them!

[@H.D.Kim0829]

Dokdo is not territory dispute and Japanese territory. Dokdo has been Korean territory since 512 A.D.

[@Yuusyasan]

But in the end, the San Francisco Peace Treaty states that Dokdo belongs to Japan:)

[@northstar1727]

Imagine how bad it would get when some natural resource like oil was found in the rocks

[@user-dz4eb5rb3g]

It has fresh water

[@조가비-p9b]

It has also methane hydrate

[@Pra_seodymium]

actually, there is

[@northstar1727]

@@Pra_seodymium if you're going to say that it's freshwater I don't want to hear it, I already know I watched the video

[@Pra_seodymium]

@@northstar1727 We don't learn much about freshwater, but instead we learn a lot about natural monuments and methane hydrates

[@cherry_pudding217]

Could you explain why Korea is keep on refusing international court? Japan is trying to solve the problem on court but Korea is refusing for 3 times already. Why? Also during San Francisco Peace conference, it was decided that it belongs to Japan. Please do more research on the fact. Don’t know where you got the resource from but, I really want to know the reason why Korea is refusing to go on court.

[@김서방-v8k]

Dokdo belongs to Korea, but Koreans do not want to allow the slightest chance of losing an international trial and being taken to Japan. If we lose, we risk losing our territory. Even if we win, there will be no benefit except recognition. If a court is held that the U.S. is owned by Russia, why would the U.S. accept it if half of the world agrees and half opposes it? Another example is that our cat is ours, and it is not welcome if someone claims it and takes it to court. Koreans think this. I used a translator. It's the position of Koreans.

[@Jaeyun0909]

And then we recognize Dokdo as a disputed territory, and I don't think that's necessary because Koreans are already living there

[@OneandonlyCarp]

@@김서방-v8k why would you be worried that you will lose your land? The court would be fair to both countries, and as you say, if Dokdo is actually Korean land you will still have it instead of Japan. Japanese Fishermen were killed because of these islands, so not having a court would mean no benefit to us as well

[@OneandonlyCarp]

@@Jaeyun0909if you go by that logic, Antarctica would be Argentinian land.

[@ihateallrace.soimnotracist550]

@@OneandonlyCarpNo they dont need to cuz Korean dont even think that is problem Cuz Old japan maps say its korean territory tho And if korea is illigally occupying the island then Japanese 1910-1945💀💀 We dont hear abt War crime country Brainwashed by Anime

[@maddmarkk1]

Loved the video

[@MIYAHONG-ft6tn]

I remember 20 years ago, when Koreans interviewed Japanese people, "Do you know where Takeshima is or what it is?" 98% said, "I don't know, but is it an island?" However, when it was known that Dokdo has natural resources, suddenly more people claim that Takeshima belongs to Japan. When Korea was playing Dokdo Challenge for 30 years, Japan didn't even know what takeshima was. AND there are probably still many Japanese who are not interested. On the other hand, 100% of Koreans know where Dokdo is.

[@truestrose234]

your comment means nothing at all. 100% of japanese now know where takeshima is. 20 years, ago I doubt any koreans knew. ??? please try to apply some logic next time.

[@뿌링클곱창막창짬뽕불]

​​@@truestrose234We knew Dokdo like since 512 😅

[@snowman-123-v5q]

​@lyserinth1041 the young generations are getting brainwashed and it should be illegal. Feels bad for the young kids in Japan

[@piano_beginner]

･Japan's Cabinet decided in 1905 to incorporate Takeshima into Shimane Prefecture. ･Even in the San Francisco Peace Treaty, which demarcated Japan's territory after the war, Takeshima was not included in the area Japan should abandon. Let the ICJ resolve this issue.

[@Peter-dp7xi]

​@@piano_beginnerno no. Why the hell should Korea take risks when it is rightfully their territory? Plus, it is impossible to start another war between Korea and Japan due to their close economic relationship and the presence of U.S. Sooooo... good luck with that! 🤣

[@dilliedillie1296]

Interesting

[@brucehur2051]

apan is evil country! JAPANESE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS STILL VISITS SHRINE FOR THE WW2 DEAD SOLDIERS ANNUALLY! GERMANS DON'T GO VISIT ADOLF HITLER'S GRAVE AND PRAY FOR HIM......

[@pedroantonio9467]

Amazing content!! Thank you

[@김예슬-m1i]

As a South Korean, the Dokdo issue should be viewed as a combination of North Korea and South Korea. North and South Korea are always in the news about Dokdo. 1.North and South Korea went through Japanese colonial era in 1905 2. At that time, Dokdo was also forcibly invaded 3.After Japan declared abandonment in 1945, Dokdo became Korea's under international law 4.Therefore, Dokdo is being guarded by the Korean police. But Japan says that Korea is illegally occupying. 5. Most importantly, there is too much evidence that Japan described Dokdo as Korean territory. Dokdo is not a disputed territory. It was originally a territory of North and South Korea. The video was very informative.

[@YA-fi3ng]

Before talking about Takeshima, the Korean people need to learn about the "Dictator Syngman Rhee Line." This video does not mention the "Dictator Syngman Rhee Line" and is biased in its reporting towards the Korean side.

[@ali-bf6to]

The maps from Japan themselves, made before the modern age, shows dokdo as korean territory.

[@ネットは怖いぞよ]

I am Japanese and I was taught that Takeshima is Japanese territory and I believe so. Well, I don't intend to quarrel here. It's a pity that East Asian countries don't get along with each other because of their political and historical backgrounds, even though their people get along well with each other. I like bibimbap and samgyeopsal.

[@0012qjh]

Same here. I am Korean. Today, My lunch was bootadon, Japanese food. And I really like to watch Japanese animations and listen to 80’s city pop! We can be best friends each other. 🤝😊

[@Yutaro-Yoshii]

As a japanese person, i'm personally okay if the government decided to relinquish the claim if that meant improving the relation with the third strongest economy in east Asia. Sounds like a very small price to pay.

[@karowana]

Thank you. Japanese and Korean citizens respect each other for the most part and we want to improve relations. Japanese leaders who decide to relinquish claim will never be elected into office again however so this will continue to be a stalemate.

[@Yutaro-Yoshii]

@@karowana Recently though we had an assassination of a former PM that's tied to a religious organization from South Korea. I've been noticing that the sense of mistrust to Korean people is spreading among my Japanese peers. I think it's nonsensical to tie an entire nation with some religious group, but unfortunately that's how it is.

[@karowana]

@@Yutaro-Yoshii Yes, that's unfortunate. I've heard about this Korean cult and its permeation through Japanese politics. I understand why an average Japanese citizen might feel mistrust at this time towards their politicians and Koreans. You seem like an great person I'm glad there's Japanese people that think like you. Gives me hope that we can improve relations in the future. I hope this cult dies off in Japan and Korea.

[@Leo-hr7yq]

I don't believe you're Japanese😂 Can you type the same comment in Japanese?

[@Yutaro-Yoshii]

​@@Leo-hr7yq 日本国内では確かに竹島を尖閣諸島、北方領土などと並べて譲れない日本固有の領土とする動きや意見が多いです。しかし竹島については、領有に固執するよりは、手放して得られる利の方が大きいと考えています。韓国は極東で3番目に大きい経済で、お互いに中国の拡大を警戒するという戦略も同じです。領土問題や歴史問題を水に流して、お互いの発展を最優先に考えることが、少子高齢化や安全保障などの問題を解決する糸口になると思っています。

[@June-bv2wb]

As a korean, Dokdo is important as a symbol, not for economical value or wide sea. I mean, Symbol of independence from Japan. For korean, this problem is not just about territory, it’s about pride. (Korean commonly think of the time with Dokdo when korea became one of colonies of Japan) That’s why korean has so sensitive and emotional reaction about this problem.

[@kd5412]

It doesn’t matter how you feel. Don’t illegally occupy the island.

[@so..n]

@@kd5412 u mad japanese bro?

[@kd5412]

Any reasonable person is a mad person in Korea.

[@jeffreykim1224]

@@kd5412 Mad person in Korea = a reasonable person. Interesting

[@kd5412]

@@jeffreykim1224 I didnt say so. Necessary condition and sufficient condition. Orange is a fruit. But fruit is not orange.

[@captainmouse12]

what a neat video. great watch!

[@鯖-g4k]

To the self-confident Koreans, if you can proudly say that Takeshima is your territory, then let's settle the issue in an international court! It should be that simple, right?

[@배슬찬-h7k]

I'm Korean and I'll refute this. What if our country, South Korea says that New York is ours? This is the same circumstance. Japan: Dokdo is our territory.= South Korea: New York is our territory.

[@blue-d4g]

Yes, and I’ll formally write an essay online about how the Netherlands are actually a property of my family. I’m sure the International Court will decide whether or not I am the rightful ruler of the Netherlands.

[@min-kz7tm]

@@배슬찬-h7k Think calmly. If Japan say such a ridiculous thing,other contries criticize and make fun of Japan. But they don’t. Guess why,this is because there is evidence to support Takeshima Dokdo problem from japanese position. It's San francisco peace treaty. In that treaty,Takeshima or Dokdo was not included in the islands to be returned to Korea. That's why we need an international trial.

[@po2769]

​@@min-kz7tm In addition to Dokdo, the name of the hundreds of islands returned to Korea was not indicated in the Treaty of Sen Francisco. So are they all Japanese-owned islands?

[@pyre8084]

Only if we can trust you not to bribe your way out of this like you've bribed your way out of most of your problems. It would also help if you didn't keep showing us how you respond whenever the international community proves the truth of something you don't like. Wink wink comfort women, wink wink 731

[@usr1726bxhshshxhdhshs]

In the drafting process of the San Francisco Peace Treaty (signed on September 8, 1951 and entered into force on April 28, 1952), which dealt with Japan's territorial treatment after World War II, Korea requested the United States, which was drafting the treaty, to include Takeshima in the area to be abandoned by Japan. However, the U.S. clearly rejected Korea's request, stating that "Takeshima has never been treated as part of Chosun and is Japanese territory. This is clearly shown in diplomatic documents released by the U.S. government. As a result, the San Francisco Peace Treaty stipulated "Chosun including Jeju, Geomundo and Ulleungdo" as an area to be abandoned by Japan, and Takeshima was intentionally excluded from it. Thus, in the San Francisco Peace Treaty, which established the international order after World War II, Takeshima was confirmed as Japan's territory.

[@nicocola284]

This is very good and instructive i really appreciated it

[@jakafe1188]

Dear Japanese, Dokdo is not Takeshima(bamboo island) because there is no bamboo in Dokdo. Dokdo is small islets consist of two rocks, bamboo can't grow naturally in Dokdo so how how can Japanese people name rock islets "Bamboo Island" in the past? That doesn't make sense. You are being confused with other islands that exist in south where bamboo actually grow.

[@kd5412]

Why do Korean say the same thing? “Take” means fierce. It’s a fierce island but fierce is not a positive meaning so Japanese changed the character to bamboo which is also “take.” You can find the information in 15min if you try.

[@rinrin6736]

huh... can't u search informations?

[@peacemaking6852]

@@kd5412 It's information that comes out even if you search a little, but if you search through Japanese media, only false information comes out, so it's useless to explain it.

[@jakafe1188]

@@kd5412 So you named an island "Fierce" despite being a negative meaning and don't even use the given name so you change the meaning to bamboo island and call a rock bamboo island??? what a moron

[@ShosinMelotic]

@@jaeyoon71_icehockey island = 독도 🗿🗿🗿

[@BirdAviator111]

The word Takeshima comes from the korean word 죽도 meaning "bamboo island". It proves that Dokdo was long since korean territory. The another proof is that during Silla regime which is the older version of Korea, there are still records existing proving that Silla general "yi sa boo" have conquered 우산국(old ver. Of dokdo). This means that the territory was Korea's for over 1000 years

[@こんにちは-h8n]

It is not mentioned here, but even though the problem has not been solved yet, South Korea has unfairly detained 4,000 Japanese fishermen around Takeshima in the past and killed eight people. I think this is not a good thing

[@reddiamond5785]

Don't trust distorted data in Japan too much. The detention of 4,000 people and the murder of eight people for fishing on Korean soil in the first place are data made up by Japan to take Dokdo away. Do you think this is flexible?The Japanese government, which makes up inflexible stories in the first place, is just not happy.

[@인생은로또-r9e]

일제시대때 일본인이 한국인 학살한것은요? 당신집에 도둑이들었는데 가만히있나요? ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ멍청한질문

[@snali9762]

You don't seem to remember how many people you murdered and raped? You did a lot of human experimentation, but I guess your ancestors didn't tell you about it? Rather, it is the Japanese who invaded the territory of another country, but do Japanese people blame the country when there is a problem after invading the territory of another country? When you look at people like you, it seems that Japanese history education is really crappy. You'd faint in astonishment if you knew the number of people the Japanese killed in the Nanjing Massacre. Other than that, more people died in Japan's imperialist war of aggression. Is that the only thing you can say? Please, if you are a war criminal country, keep quiet like a war criminal country. I've heard that you cosplay as a victim just because your country was hit by nuclear weapons, but I never thought that you wouldn't be aware that the number of people you killed would be dozens or hundreds of times more.

[@MIYAHONG-ft6tn]

If Korea had the ability to capture 4,000 fishing boats near Dokdo in Japan during the GHQ era, it would have decided to set up the Rhee Syngman Line from Oki Island to the coast of Fukuoka lol. Why did you dock what you claim to be "four thousand fishing boats" on someone else's land without consent in the first place? It was the right thing for a nation to do to counter unprovoked intrusions. Then tell me now why japan slaughtered millions of Koreans for no reason.

[@부계임]

Imagine that Dokdo is very small and 4,000 people come there. Who would stay still? you will fight

[@emucitizen5892]

When a rock is more important than you:

[@wtz_under]

yeah, thats my point. humans are wild

[@syurang]

Very important strategic geography

[@mimorisenpai8540]

For strategic geography this will increase their ZEE

[@walter-ze1]

lots of natural sources under dokdo

[@yunwooyunjitv0318]

To explain, the reason our country is not going to ICJ is because there is no reason to. If I go to the middle of Tokyo and yell "JAPAN IS KOREA'S!!" and request that we go to ICJ to get it over with, would Japan accept it? Absolutely not. This is because Japan is clearly Japan's land and there can be nothing against that. It's the same situation for Dokdo. Japan pretty much ignored Dokdo back then and accepted that it was clearly Korean land. They have JUST hopped into this mess of an arguement, suddenly claiming that Dokdo is Japan's land. San Fransisco Peace Treaty? Read SCAPIN. Issued after the San Fransisco Peace Treaty. Instead of apolagizing what they did in WW2, they're just trying to steal an island that is HISTORICALLY OURS. Dokdo was ours before the syngmahn-lee line.

[@lagrangewei]

Japan does the same thing to Taiwan, Diaoyutai is clearly part of Taiwan. sadly the government are just puppet of US.

[@MassMen]

wouldn't going to the ICJ solve the problem tho?

[@転生者Amix]

What? You're not going out because it's not necessary for you? That's interesting. Isn't it? Because you know you'll lose if you go out, right? If you can prove that Takeshima belongs to Korea, you can settle it once and for all in an international court. I can see why you're not going to do that.

[@pyre8084]

​​@@転生者AmixLobbying, aka bribery, is an incredibly powerful tool. A tool that is illegal in Korea. Thus, the Korean capability to bribe officials and companies is less developed than that of Japan. With this knowledge, it would be foolish to send this matter to a third party, especially when there is nothing to gain and everything to lose. "Solving the issue" won't make the Japanese government deny history any more than proof for comfort women and unit 731 have stopped them from denying those/worshipping the perpetrators as gods in their shrines. Plus, Korea loses nothing even if the issue isn't resolved in the ICJ. Japan won't do anything more than verbally whine about wanting more territory in this time and age. Their Empire has been taken away from them. They can't really go back to their child-raping and human-experimenting days regardless of how much they want to, especially through military force. Why should Korea take an arrogant risk and allow the risk of a potentially swayable third party tweaking the truth in Japan's favor?

[@themarimo3324]

That sounds so convenient for South Koreans haha. That's like saying Russia doesn't have to go to ICJ for Ukraine because they believe it is their territory 100% historically

[@sibalshke]

Dokdo has historically been recognized as Korean territory, so Korea still manages Dokdo.

[@あう-x7t]

Takeshima is japanese teritory

[@Shshdajaqqk]

​@@あう-x7tyes,the dakesima is japan😊 But dokdo is korea😊

[@뿌링클곱창막창짬뽕불]

​@@あう-x7tNo, you guys have to bring passport to go Dokdo. because it's our territory.

[@あう-x7t]

@@뿌링클곱창막창짬뽕불 Takeshima is an island taken by South Korea. During the capture, dozens of Japanese were killed or injured, and many were forcibly taken away. It has been illegally occupied by South Korea ever since. Why would South Korea, which criticizes Japanese imperialism, do something like this? Many Koreans should reconsider their words and actions.

[@oceanrocks]

@@あう-x7t “According to the foundation, dozens of ancient maps designating Dokdo as Korean were published by the Japanese government in 1894, 1903, 1929 and 1941. Japan has insisted that Dokdo was incorporated into Japanese territory through a 1905 notice by Shimane Prefecture. But a number of official Japanese maps produced in 1908, 1925, 1938 and 1951 still show Dokdo as not belonging to Japan. In addition, about 100 old Western maps and another 100 ancient Korean maps define Dokdo as Korean territory, the foundation noted.”

[@Freedom-Edge]

There is ample evidence in historical Korean documents that Korea has effectively controlled Dokdo for a long time. Even in official historical documents of Japan, there are acknowledgments of Dokdo as Korean territory, with fishing activities prohibited in the area. Maps drawn by prominent Japanese figures of the time also depict Dokdo as Korean land. Furthermore, the Allied Powers' SCAPIN-677 document, which is more recent than the San Francisco Treaty, officially recognizes Dokdo as Korean territory.

[@siyann9960]

Like it or not who should have passport when they visit this island?

[@ZZZ2573]

As the saying goes, peace between Japan and South Korea is caused by China, peace between China and Japan is caused by S. Korea, and peace between China and S. Korea is caused by Japan

[@MatthewBaka]

what can South Korea do that puts Japan and China into cooperation?

[@gocool_2.0]

@@MatthewBaka If South Korea annexes North Korea?

[@MatthewBaka]

@@gocool_2.0 True but I really doubt that would happen soon.

[@agreekim3976]

@@MatthewBaka Korea is the weakiest country among them but they are still top-ranked GDP country in the world

[@Minsang1st]

What did S. Korea do that makes China and Japan hate it other than jealousy?

[@Kanen53]

I am Japanese and I think this problem is caused by the fact that GHQ did not clearly decide which country owns this small island called Takeshima, it is not a problem that can be solved by discussing in the comments section of KZbin. It is not a good thing for both countries to have Japan-Korea relations deteriorate over such a small island.

[@uptempoblow]

I'm Japanese and the Takeshima issue is very difficult. Both Japan and Korea have some evidence, so they are claiming it as their territory, right? So why don't we just stop this stupid bickering, and since the people of neither country are ever going to give up, why don't we just have an international tribunal to decide which country's islands are theirs?Why didn't they have an international trial in the first place before now?

[@음-e4d]

한국이 도쿄를 한국땅이라 주장하고 이에 대한 재판을 요구하면 일본이 받아들일까요? 당연히 아니겠죠. 도쿄는 일본땅이니까요. 이와같은 이유로 한국은 재판에 참여 할 필요가 없는겁니다. 일본이 독도를 일본땅이라 우기는것은 일본이 한국을 강제 침략하였을당시 한국이 가지고있던 독도를 불법적으로 일본이 점유했으며 전쟁에서 패하고나서도 아직까지 일본의 잔재를 일본것이라 우기고 있기때문에 발생하는 문제 입니다.

[@YA-fi3ng]

@@음-e4d Are Koreans lame in English?

[@BradfordTheSperm-Blutcherer]

한국인으로서 재판에 안가면 우리들의 섬인데 왜 재판을 받습니까? ㅋㅋㅋ 한국의 이기주의 국가고 전체주의 국가다. 상식적으로 해결하려 하지 마라

[@jeanmiyu6904]

It's easily understandable that TAKESHIMA is under JPN's sovereignty at the sight of San Francisco Treaty and its supplementary documents issued by Allied Powers. You need to know how JPN's renewed territoty had been determined.

[@김은지-s4n]

dokdo is korea's. there was some koreans living there and they formed kindom of usan. soon they were conquered by kingdom of sinla.there is a lot of historic documents about dokdo,and there is even japanese documents and maps telling dokdo is korean territory. gojong emperor of korean empire also claimed dokdo as korean territory.after the ww2,allies made maps which show dokdo is korean.even though the truth is like this,people still call east korean sea as sea of japan and call dokdo dakeshima.please eveyone,don't think it is other country's problem and help.we suffered a lot during our history and japan is still being cruel.remember what they did to our sea.they are polluting it with fukushima radioactive meterials and making their empire again by claiming the sea.when dokdo falls, next is us korea and then, you, the world.

[@YA-fi3ng]

The majority of Japanese people do not want to be involved with South Korea. Japan will not want to be involved even if the Korean War resumes or South Korea's economy collapses. If the South Korean government lifts its armed occupation of Japanese territory, Takeshima, Japan will no longer want anything to do with South Korea.

[@DetectiveRackham]

No disputes about it. SCAPIN 667 explicitly REMOVED Japanese ownership of the rocks, and San Francisco treaty DID NOT give the rocks back to Japan. Since Japanese ownership over the rocks was removed and never returned, it is only logical to conclude that Japan does not have jurisdiction over the rocks. Since no other countries made reasonable efforts to claim the rocks afterward besides Korea, it is Korea that owns the rocks without question. To those of you who question why Korea simply does not take Japan to international court: if Germany, similar to Japan, continuously whined about how Alsace and Lorraine belonged to Germany and how France is illegally occupying them now, why would France bother to take Germany to international court to determine the ownership of Alsace and Lorraine? A complete waste of time and effort, with a real risk of ‘shady’ deals corrupting judgement. Just like how France would not bother, so too is Korea.

[@jeanmiyu6904]

You seem a representative of ignorant Koreans. Scapin 667 is just a directive related to "Governmental & Administrative Seperation", not a determinant directive to JPN's sovereignty. To begin with, international law requires agreement and/or treaty made by and between countries when ownership of territory moves. Piece of paper Allied Powers sent to JPN via telegram or something like that is deemed unmatch for that. That's why SKor asked US to revise the content of the final draft of the treaty on July 19, 1951 after receipt of that and there are plural confirmed evidences telling SF treaty is only a determinant document to JPN's sovereignty. So there is contradiction in your assertion, which shows you just put what you want to say WITHOUT SEEING PRIMARY EVIDENCES. It's easily understandable which country is a miserable liar on this territorial claims bcuz there are a lot of conclusive evidences written in English issued by third party. SKor just failed to legally take Liancourt Rocks due to no-evidence it has been under its sovereignty till 1910. Needless yo say, a liar is SKor. Of course, there are documents criticizing SKor doing an illegal act on JPN's island. Even medias entitled, "South Korea, Problem Nation" after SKor committed a crime in 1954. JPN keeps criticizing SKores keeping an illegal act and being runnimg away from fighting the court battle at ICJ. SKor is mentally weak and can't bear such criticizing from the world, unlike China. lol

[@YA-fi3ng]

Alsace-Lorraine and the "Syngman Rhee Line" are separate matters.

[@도하29]

@@YA-fi3ng He didn't talk about it

[@YA-fi3ng]

@@도하29 Claiming Takeshima (Dokdo) as Korean territory is the same as claiming that the Syngman Rhee Line is legitimate.

[@도하29]

@@YA-fi3ng I admit that. But we have more evidence. 1. 512, General Isabu incorporated Usanguk into Silla territory. 2. Sejong's Annals Geography stated that Dokdo is an island that can be seen well if the weather is clear from Ulleungdo Island. 3. In Dongguk Literature Bibigo, both Dokdo and Ulleungdo Island were described as Usanguk. 4. A Japanese official identified Dokdo as "an adjunct to Joseon" in 1870." 5.1900, King Gojong declared Dokdo to the world under the jurisdiction of Ulleung-gun. 6. Invalidation of international law in Japan-Korea Treaty of 1905, Shimane Prefecture. 7. 1906, Shim Heung-taek(Mayor of Ulleng gun) stated in the observatory of Ganghwa Island that it was "Dokdo belonging to the Ulleng gun." 8. At the Cairo conference, "Japan will be ousted from all areas seized by violence," and the Potsdam Declaration confirmed this. 9. In the Memorandum of the Supreme Command of the Allied Forces [SCAPIN] No. 667 states that Dokdo is not Japanese territory. 10. The San Francisco Peace Treaty does not specify Dokdo but decided to return all of Korea's territory. (Dokdo is not specified because there are so many islands in Korea that it cannot be written down.) 11. Japanese cannot come to Dokdo without a passport

[@hyunsungjung4941]

As a Korean, I second this video. Just wanted to add, that the Korean Imperial government declared Ulleung island and Dokdo within its territory in Imperial decree no.41 before Japanese annexation in 1904. Great work regardless!

[@tr_oesolder5462]

Cant we split the islands

[@user-qh3cm7tz8c]

I’m Japanese. The sokuto of "Korean Empire Edict No. 41" issued by Emperor Gojong is the current Gwaneumdo Island. It's not Takeshima. I don't want you to spread lies.

[@유성현-z3h]

@@user-qh3cm7tz8c Gwaneumdo Island is not an island, but rather a rock rising out. In fact, Gwaneumdo Island is only 100 meters away from Ulleungdo Island. Therefore, this rock is too close to Ulleungdo Beach, and its size is too small to be mentioned as an area under the jurisdiction of Uldo Island. Another notable island is Gongam in the main surface of Ulleungdo Island, which is not mentioned in Decree No. 41, but is important. This is because Gwaneumdo Island is not mentioned as importantly as other neighboring rock islands on the map of Lee Gyu-won. Looking at a map of Ulleungdo Island surveyed by the Japanese battleship Amazi in 1880, it can be seen that Gwaneumdo Island is not an island, but an extension of the main island.In Korean, the word for rock is "stone." The Chinese character pronunciation of a stone is "Seok". As mentioned, the residents (82%) of the part were from Jeolla-do. "Dol" is commonly pronounced as "Dok" in their dialect. Ulleungdo often tell their people are changing the name “Dokdo” and “Sukdo”. Below, it is a chart showing actual examples of Koreans pronouncing the letter "Seok" as "Dok" in some parts of Jeollanam-do until now.

[@user-qh3cm7tz8c]

@@유성현-z3h ① sokuto is Gwaneumdo. In fact, the 1928 Dong-A Ilbo stated, "When viewed from all sides, stone pillars support Gwaneumdo. Because there are many stone Buddha-shaped rocks in it, this island is called Gwaneumdo. It's just like a big building. " sokuto = There is no document that can prove Gwaneumdo, but as far as the contents of this newspaper are read, it is highly possible that the origin of Ishijima comes from the stone pillars of Gwaneumdo. ②Most of the people from Ulleungdo are from Jeolla-do, but did you know that Jeolla-do also has an island called sokuto or Dokdo? In addition, the accent of "石" includes "独" and "毒", and it is not confirmed as "独島". ③In 1955, the "Introduction to the Dokdo Problem" published by the Korean government describes such contents. "There are no official records incorporated into the administrative divisions of Ulleungdo." In other words, the Korean government has denied sokuto = Dokdo as having no official records.

[@정민욱-f3y]

@@user-qh3cm7tz8c 3. For the purpose of this directive, Japan is defined to include the four main islands of Japan (Hokkaido, Honshu, Kyushu and Shikoku) and the approximately 1,000 smaller adjacent islands, including the Tsushima Islands and the Ryukyu (Nansei) Islands north of 30° North Latitude (excluding Kuchinoshima Island); and excluding (a) Utsuryo (Ullung) Island, Liancourt Rocks (Take Island) and Quelpart (Saishu or Cheju) Island, (b) the Ryukyu (Nansei) Islands south of 30° North Latitude (including Kuchinoshima Island), the Izu, Nanpo, Bonin (Ogasawara) and Volcano (Kazan or Iwo) Island Groups, and all the other outlying Pacific Islands {including the Daito (Ohigashi or Oagari) Island Group, and Parece Vela (Okinotori), Marcus (Minami-tori) and Ganges (Nakano-tori) Islands}, and (c) the Kurile (Chishima) Islands, the Habomai (Hapomaze) Island Group (including Suisho, Yuri, Akiyuri, Shibotsu and Taraku Islands) and Shikotan Island. 5. The definition of Japan contained in this directive shall also apply to all future directives, memoranda and orders from this Headquarters unless otherwise specified therein. -SCAPIN 677(Memorandum of the Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers 677) 

[@Kanen53]

Ordinary South Korean self-proclaimed experts proudly publish Googled information in KZbin comment sections, but the South Korean government has not responded to Japan's request to discuss the matter at the International Court of Justice. This is the truth.

[@po2769]

The Korean government has no intention of making Dokdo a disputed territory from the beginning.

[@user-cs1ds8sb9v]

Will Japan discuss the Senkaku Islands issue with China at the International Court of Justice?

[@계부-j1g]

Dokdo is completely Korean territory, not a disputed area

[@user-yukkuri_mocchiri_2]

@@user-cs1ds8sb9v Since Japan is currently in effective control, it is unlikely that they will sue. If a case were to be brought to the International Court of Justice, it would likely be from the People's Republic of China or the Republic of China (Taiwan).

[@happycentury4288]

You know, as a Japanese student I was given plenty of reasons to think South Korea's claim over the islands are illegitimate. The Syngman Rhee line being drawn after the san fransisco treaty, South Korean border guards foecefully displacing japanese fisherman, that sort of stuff. And I will be honest, I still think South Korea should accept coming to the International court to settle this. However when I look at the issue from a third person view like this video, I see that there are a lot of facts that support Korea's claim as well. I didn't know about those things. I wonder if the same thing is happening on the other side, and koreans are being given all the reasons to think that the Japanese claim is total nonsense, while not knowing any of the reasons that the Japanese think it rightfully belongs to them. Whoever the rightfull owner of the island actually is, I just want to say, we should still be respectful to each other, because the other side is being just as manipulated as you are.

[@TriplePistol]

@@잉따-q6s Exactly. They could provide their reasons but they just can't. I'm so frustrated to see this nonsense.

[@tracegd3936]

Why doesn't korea go to the International Court: Korea: owning this island and have nothing to win through the trial.

[@yantom701]

@@잉따-q6s Japanese think people who detest being in court are dishonest and criminal and it's common sense for Japanese.

[@chaneo5877]

I wonder why Japan wants to occupy more land even though it has more land than South Korea

[@jeanmiyu6904]

@@chaneo5877 The population of JPN is about two and a half times as large as that of SKor. So the larger territory is needed for us to survive. Meanwhile SKor can always go back to be one of provinces of China like the past by abandoning the current ideology, unlike JPN. I'll revise the history awareness of Korea if it's wrong.

[@믄s]

Japan: This pencil is mine 🙂 Korea: What? Suddenly? This has been mine since long ago 😳 Japan: But this is mine.😃 Korea: What are you talking about? Do you want to see the receipt?😟 Japan: Then let's ask our teacher 😶 Korea: No, the receipt is here! What are you talking about?!😡 Japan: Why, are you afraid not? 🤪 Korea: I can't understand...🤬

[@bugyejeong5329]

Takeshima is Japanese territory. Usando, which Korea claims to be the old name of Takeshima, is not Takeshima

[@믄s]

@@bugyejeong5329 The Japanese point to false and fabricated evidence and insist that Dokdo belongs to Japan. I heard you even post the fabricated fact as if it were real in your textbook? So the Japanese are brainwashed like it's true... Do you really think that Korea, which was ruined by the war, was able to take away the island of Japan? Dokdo has long been an island of Koreans..All the raw data point to Korea as the owner of Dokdo. In fact, Korea's old history books have too much to prove that Dokdo is Korean territory. What evidence does Japan use to call Dokdo a Takeshima

[@e_bebe]

@@bugyejeong5329 Dokdo is Korean territory, and Takesima is Japanese territory The island next to Ulleungdo is Dokdo. Takesima is a fiction island ☠☠☠

[@kehaoyan7529]

Fantastic channel!

[@Sheridan885]

Of course, the Japanese who have learned that Takeshima is Japanese territory since they were young would think so. It's hard for anyone to deny planted knowledge. However, the problem of thinking that someone else's things are yours is by no means a light matter. Think about how they would react differently when this became their problem. Empathy will be the essence of this problem. 😊

[@In_Our_Timeline]

1:08 the bird is just chilling

[@Yarnooee]

i think i'm the only one who think wish this rock just vanished like it never exist. after treaty on fishing of korean and japan(한일어업협정) in this area, economical benefits of claim this psedo-island are near non-exsistent. All that's left is discord, noise, and distrust between the two sides.

[@user-mz8vy4fv1f]

No. All that's left is the remnants of Japan's Japanese Nazi. People who know Dokdo well don't say it's Japanese territory. Because all the stories tell us that Dokdo belongs to Korea, and in 1905, Japan deceived Korea and spread the lie that Dokdo belongs to Japan. The San Francisco Treaty and the Scpqin stipulate that Dokdo is not a Japanese territory and guarantees all rights of Korea. The 19th-century maps of Russia and Japan clearly depict Dokdo as Korean territory. The geographical location of Dokdo is the same as that of Usando in Korea. In 1905, Japan incorporated Dokdo into Japanese territory and did not speak to Joseon. After spreading lies all over the world, they told the manager of Ulleungdo in jeoson in 1906. The administrator reported to the king of Joseon that he had heard that the island under his jurisdiction had become Japanese territory, and Koreans protested. But Japan ignored South Korea's protest. This is because Korea's diplomatic power fell into Japan's hands when it found out about Dokdo.

[@mst0452]

First of all, from the conclusion, Dokdo is Korean territory. The most important factor in internationally recognizing the territorial sovereignty of a disputed area is not which country's land was in the past, but which country has effective control at the time of arbitration, which is based on the precedents of the International Court. So, whatever the past, as of the present time, the Republic of Korea is under effective control, so the sovereignty is in the Republic of Korea.

[@TheDonner000]

This. Generally speaking, to tell if a country has effective sovereignty over somewhere, you simply have to see what court you will be taken to if you commit a crime. If a nation has the capability to prosecute it's own laws somewhere, it means it has control over the land. It means it has police, infrastructure in place that allows them to claim it other than shouting about it.

[@雰囲気アットホーム]

国際裁判所に3回も出廷拒否した韓国がなんか言ってるわ。韓国が国際司法裁判所に行く気になれば日本政府は必ず行くよ

[@백-k3j]

This. Also, if we continue this for a couple of more decades, then Japan cannot say a shit about it anymore as it will be proclaimed to be the land of Korea under law. Japan, cry more. Keep wasting your life in fighting all these useless arguments that will become obsolete in a few decades.

[@山田次郎-e8i]

So South Korea and Russia are invading nations.

[@성이름-s9j3y]

@@山田次郎-e8i bullshit lol

[@c_kenma7307]

I am Japanese and educated in Japan, so I believe Takeshima is Japanese territory. But to be honest, I don't care which side it belongs to anymore, I want you to decide clearly which territory it is after a fair judgment in a firm forum. If this becomes Korean territory, I will give up on it. With the looming threats of China, North Korea, and Russia, it's foolish to leave this issue unresolved and keep the public sentiment at odds. (I am using a machine translation so my English may be flawed)

[@wewenttomcdonald]

There's no japanese living on Takeshima and there's only Koreans living on that island. So I believe it's Korean

[@prohightension2000]

It's kinda childish that you claim both countries take it to the international court because it's not even a disputed land right now. Y'all suddenly claim that Korea should take it to the court and settle it once and for all, but it's been a korean territory the whole time. why the fuck would they take it just because you claim it lol. Such waste of time and fucked up logic. Think about it this way: Korea goes nuts and suddenly claims that Tsushima belongs to them because many koreans moved there throughout the history. Then they also state that Korea and Japan should just take the matter to the court. I mean, why the fuq would you? Tsushima belongs to Japan which is why you have literally no reason to take it there.

[@sunnywind02]

@@wewenttomcdonald In 1953, before the Korean occupation, there was no one living on the island. To justify the unjust occupation, South Korea sent several people to live on the island as residents. It is a cowardly measure and completely unacceptable.

[@ihateallrace.soimnotracist550]

Sorry but old japan map say dokdo is koreans And War crime country disown korea and war crime country now trying to invade again

[@NewSchattenRayquaza]

nice video ^^

[@쓩-m5m]

Only korean can go Dokdo without passport. What words need more?

[@ゴリラの背中]

Then, even if Japan occupies Busan without permission and it is Japanese territory, you won't complain, right? Of course, Japanese people wouldn't get angry if they could go to Busan without a passport and declare it to be Japanese territory, right? In the first place, what South Korea is doing is illegal occupation and illegal under international law.

[@brucehur2051]

Japan is evil country! JAPANESE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS STILL VISITS SHRINE FOR THE WW2 DEAD SOLDIERS ANNUALLY! GERMANS DON'T GO VISIT ADOLF HITLER'S GRAVE AND PRAY FOR HIM......

[@shp1908bv0-ik]

@@ゴリラの背中 ''합법''

[@QWERTY-gp8fd]

@@ゴリラの背中 it is rightfully korean. thats what u get for being asian nazi in ww2.

[@STAYDIVINE1111]

Yeah you're right that's because Korea is illegally occupying

[@の坊]

Japan proposed to South Korea in 1954, 1962, and 2012 that the matter be referred to the International Court of Justice, but South Korea refused. Korea was also proposed by the United States to refer the case to the International Court of Justice.

[@jeanmiyu6904]

Koreans love to add the word, "absolutery" and/or "definitely" in their assertion, but refuse to stand at ICJ. It's a big contradiction and is just a sign of NO CONFIDENCE to win the court battle against JPN having JUSTICE.

[@jeanmiyu6904]

@@saesangena Such ur thief's logic works only in ur corrupt country.

[@ヨガフレイム-q2q]

If there is evidence that Takeshima is definitely Korean, there is no need to reject it, is there?

[@こんにちは-h8n]

No, if there is a confirmation that it belongs to Korea, you can fight at the International Court of Justice. South Korea will win anyway, right? According to what you say. I don't know why I refuse😂😂😂

[@승원손-p6s]

@@こんにちは-h8n If I suddenly claim that Kyushu is Korean territory, will you refer it to the International Court of Justice? Even if Korea is exerting enormous influence on the International Court of Justice through huge lobbying

[@dwyderdom]

i wish he'd make a vid on the south china sea dispute

[@outerspace7391]

I hope so too! Are they being claimed by like... 7 countries at the same time?

[@李淳罡-q3e]

两个都曾经是中国的儿子，只不过现在爸爸换成了美国。

[@tr_oesolder5462]

@@李淳罡-q3e ?

[@tungmeiali1036]

This is East Sea not South China sea

[@ruru1514]

@@李淳罡-q3e Historically only Japan attacked China. not vice versa.

[@rogerwilco2]

Sounds to me like Korea has by far the strongest claim. At least based on this video.

[@jeanmiyu6904]

SKor's claim is a complete lie. Korean would come here soon, then you can see how I reveal their lies.

[@orangejuice00]

and here that korean is

[@극우]

@@jeanmiyu6904 the korean

[@극우]

@@jeanmiyu6904 is here

[@jaewonchoi1168]

@@jeanmiyu6904 thank you for your opinion. So any evidence?

[@072shiko-t6n]

I am Japanese. South Korea is said to be anti Japanese country, but I love Korea!😊

[@-monoeraser]

As a Korean here, I’ve always thought that the politics had been using this issue for their votes. In both countries.

[@dylan.t180]

This video rocks

[@arab7708]

Anyway, let's fight in court, Korea.

[@jeanmiyu6904]

@@chouloky You have two choices, one is to goad your gov to return JPN's Takeshima, the other is to goad your gov at least to stand at ICJ for court battle.

[@TriplePistol]

@@jeanmiyu6904 It seems like you have only one choice. Struggling not to lose what you desire blindly

[@jeanmiyu6904]

@@TriplePistol The thing you must do is to see primary documents, not distorted history fillied with lies and delusions, crested by your corrupt SKor gov.

[@yantom701]

@@chouloky Korean must have the concept of the word JUSTICE.

[@snali9762]

@@yantom701 It was a huge mistake for the US to use a nuclear bomb against Japan. It is a country that will be destroyed anyway, but because of the impact of the nuclear bomb, Japan has created a global image as a peace-loving Japanese who hides his true nature by cosplaying as a victim. Have a day of giving thanks to your ancestors who were hit by nuclear bombs.

[@liamnixon4428]

You know, no matter how much Japan and South Korea hate each other because of an inability to recognize and reconcile over past historical events, controversial symbols and border disputes, one can't deny that Japan and South Korea actually need each other; South Korea needs Japan not only for economic or cultural purposes, but if North Korea invades the South, then Japan could assist the South in repelling the North's attack, and offer a safe haven for Koreans fleeing the war. Japan, for it's part, relies on South Korea as a buffer state between itself, North Korea and China (I don't know what to say of Russia in the north though), which have nuclear weapons and the former has deliebratly threatened to use them; and Japan has firsthand experience with the devastation of nuclear weapons at the end of WW2, when it was just as aggressive and isolated as North Korea is today. What I'm trying to say is that no matter how much Japan and South Korea hate each other over the past, they still need and rely on each other, and they should just reconcile and stop hating each other, since now they're like the UK and France prior to the world wars; with animosity, but good allies when they encounter common enemies, and eventually they will have to put aside their differences, reconcile, and become really close in face of common threats. Besides, if they don't reconcile, they're just making each other's lives harder unnecesarily, even though they could be best buddies.

[@FOLIPE]

They rely on each other but these sorts of disputes makes their cooperation weaker which strengthens the positions of China and N.Korea

[@백-k3j]

There is no way NK will win SK. If China backs up NK, then the US will be involved, and you know how shits are going to escalate from that point onwards. I believe SK desperately wants NK to attack because SK has already outran NK in terms of military power.

[@JonJon-vg2nv]

typical foreigner who doesn’t understand a thing about this situation and instead just says “durr why dont they just stop hating each other and be friends durrr”

[@shp1908bv0-ik]

아마도 일본은 한국의 전쟁을 원할 것이다. 그래야지 일본은 돈을 더 많이 벌 수 있을것이니까.

[@JonJon-vg2nv]

@@shp1908bv0-ik you're probably right.

[@酒铃]

i love your video so much.