SovCit v. Oakly The Rest Of The Story

[@annelynch9217]

At this point, I am the injured party.

[@brianregal9899]

We all are!

[@Verwaiste_Mutter]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!

[@ThankfulQue]

😂

[@noladarrling]

😂

[@scottcampbell4678]

We all are injuried parties.

[@jplapp2862]

Judge Oakley: "I don't give a shit if you object." Oh my goodness. Don't do that when I drinking my coffee.

[@elaineroberts143]

😂😂

[@l.s.squirrel4226]

Judge Oakley almost owed me a new monitor the first time I heard it.

[@JLova82]

And if that kind of misconduct is brought to an actual court, that is the end of Oakley.

[@buck9668]

@@JLova82 if you could upload a random vid, you and I could talk

[@JLova82]

@@buck9668 It's not about me; it's about the IDEA. The IDEA of restoration of the Rule of Law *away* from the PRIVATE Bar guild and into the hands of *competent* men & women. The IDEA of fairness, of equality (as opposed to 'equity),' of morality, of truth. The IDEA that is greater than all the powers of the world, whose time has come. I'm sorry KZbin is shadow banning you, I've grown used to it.

[@dsn385]

I’m happy when a judge doesn’t put up with that crap.

[@AWICKEDVIXEN1999]

She did look how long she let him talk n waste time

[@JLova82]

Judges are lucky we put up with their crap.

[@Debra.Justice]

@@JLova82Defendants really don’t have a choice. Don’t break the law and you don’t have to appear before a judge.

[@Art3misRP1]

​@JLova82 the more you post your crap the more of a retard you look

[@RuthPruitt-kf3hc]

I’m in love with this Judge!!

[@denisemarsh8725]

I still want to hear the rest of the grilled cheese argument.

[@ED-es2qv]

We need to know this critical trial fact. I don't feel like we have a fair and public trial if the public can't find out if Captain underpants has had a grilled cheese, and the relevance of the experience. We could have a judicial verdict, based entirely on a food preparation process, the details of which have been concealed by the judge. I smell a conspiracy to commit capital felony treason. With a sandwich, of all unholy creations.

[@trapjaw6818]

Same

[@meaganlewis6077]

Ditto....I had to stop the video before that conversation ended and came back specifically to hear the ending....now I fear I am gonna be left without closure

[@DanielOrtiz-g6u]

I like to believe there wasn't one, and he genuinely just wanted to know.

[@soggybiscotti8425]

Would have just been, have you had a toasted cheese sandwich? Or a jaffa, or whatever else you guys call them in the US when you use a sandwich press. But yeah, I like to believe he eas just asking out of curiosity, like judges are allergic to them or are only fed a diet of rabbit pellets

[@barelyasurvivor1257]

Mike I am shocked, shocked I say, at the lack of proof of jurisdiction.

[@sarahchews9353]

*FOR THE RECORD there is no jurisdiction *for the record

[@laurelschiller8753]

@@sarahchews9353😂😂

[@richlaue]

Does Mike have the jurisdiction to post this video?

[@barelyasurvivor1257]

@@richlaue Hmm, thats a good question. I will ask my Private Attorney General on this. He is a Constitutional Scholar.

[@TheDenisedrake]

"He's guilty as sin and dumb as a stone." Truer words have never been spoken.

[@rebeccasmith4519]

I love the way Judge Oakley handles the sovcits or moorish citizens whatever they claim they are . Mike THANK YOU for the follow up. 💛

[@yorkshirerose9622]

The court has jurisdiction because he’s locked up, there’s his jurisdiction

[@denisemarsh8725]

"You have the right to be informed. You have been informed. Your lack of comprehending is your problem. Moving on, and if you say the word jurisdiction again, you go back for thirty days for contempt."

[@JLova82]

That kind of unreasonableness means Oakley ceases to be a judge on the spot.

[@rdr99310]

@@JLova82 Arrested Development Narrator: "In spite of JLova82's assertion, Oakley did not in fact cease to be a judge."

[@JLova82]

@@rdr99310 Sure he did

[@mattbasford6299]

​@@JLova82as far as I know, he's still a judge.

[@rdr99310]

@@mattbasford6299 @JLova82 would like to know your jurisdiction for stating that he's still a judge 🤣

[@katkatb3077]

Oooh I've waited for updates on this guy! Thank you! Although I'm disappointed it's not Oakley again 😂

[@lavernrivera6302]

Where do I find the rest of this case please n thank u

[@Phoenix-ej2sh]

I am extremely impressed with Sullivan. He managed not only to get his sovcit client to STFU, but also managed to put on a very competent and aggressive case despite him.

[@JLova82]

You'd have no idea how to gauge competence, even if you saw it.

[@amandaadkins799]

"Absolutely, I'm threatening you" well..I guess that answered his question 😂, not the answer he was expecting though, I'm sure. Judge Oakley is the Best 😂❤

[@JLova82]

If raised to Oakley's superiors, that is the end of Oakley.

[@grayaj23]

@@JLova82 You have no idea how this works.

[@Tindometari]

​@JLova82 A threat is neither unethical nor legally actionable if what is being threatened is both fully lawful and entirely within the legal authority of the one making the threat. Judge Oakley might -- only *might* -- catch some legit heat over his use of less-than-savoury language from the bench, but for threatening a defendant with a contempt citation? No, that authority comes with the robe.

[@JLova82]

@@grayaj23 No, you

[@JLova82]

@@Tindometari Hmm, your circular argument is always going to skew back to "jurisdiction." Who has it? Who lacks it? Who needs it? Who doesn't? And there are three principal forms of jurisdiction: personal, territorial & subject-matter. Because these are administrative courts and NOT tribunals, if the administrator [judge] does not *perfect* those three forms of jurisdiction, then they are unable to *perfect* the bonds they invent, which defeats the purpose of their being there in the first place.

[@justartandmusic9553]

SOV CIT: “Is it maritime or admiralty” (for the 9th time) Judge “ok let’s do this differently are you gay or bi” SOV CIT: “wtf I’m straight” Judge: “see how frustrating it is when people give you everything but the right answer”

[@lindadeeds5326]

I would be surprised if judges didn’t start using your explanation. Maybe Mike should start sharing this around when he goes to court. (Wearing loose pants, of course.)

[@JLova82]

The [judge] is either lying or woefully inept

[@mattbasford6299]

​@@JLova82or..the defendant has been reading silly sovereign citizen garbage on the internet.

[@jonnyt4346]

Do these people really think they're going to walk in and make these arguments and the judge is going to say "oh wow, you're right, this court isn't legal. All charges dropped you're free to go!"

[@annelynch9217]

If only they would come and watch Sov Cits getting shutdown, they would realize how it would work out for them.

[@chadwickmoes]

I don't think they're capable of thinking.

[@richlaue]

​@@chadwickmoesthey don't want to think about it. All they want to do is regurgitate what they learn on KZbin. They watch enough videos to know that it never works.

[@elaineroberts143]

I think these Sov-Cits have and empty vat where their brain is suppose to be 🤔

[@Pink.andahalf]

They have this fantasy that it's all going to work out.

[@pullupacuppa]

I object to the Judge knowing if I have ever had a grilled cheese - this is priceless

[@martymoser8661]

Does anyone know the end of when he asks 'have you ever made a grilled cheese sandwich '?

[@pullupacuppa]

@@martymoser8661 I am so disappointed that I don't know the status of any grill cheese in this case. I think it is grounds for immediate dismissal

[@llaph]

What kind of moron, who is a felon, leaves a gun in an unattended and unlocked car in the no parking zone… At the airport? Oh wait… This one.

[@piva1358]

😂😂😂😂

[@afishynado6812]

He's not on trial for being a smart man.

[@JasonP6339]

That's what entitlement and low intelligence does to a person. To dumb to recognize a bad idea when it's staring them in the face......

[@LaninThomasma]

A living, breathing man. The flesh crawls. The blood creeps. They walk by night. What were we talking about?

[@hesuschrist9527]

Wife's gun I assume

[@scharlatan8384]

They havent even tooken his swollen after David of truth seriously.

[@sarahchews9353]

If there was admiral jurisdiction admired by the judge they would have

[@IANCHARLES1965]

​@sarahchews9353 Keelhauling was a punishment under Admiralty Law. Flogging too!!!😮😮

[@tiffanyholman4028]

The judge was post to do all that before they could proceed. He pacifically told her to. 😂 The grammar was so bad I didn't know what he was trying to say a couple times. Like when he would say the wrong word, he would say the wrong word wrong, too.

[@lovethosebudgies66]

​@@tiffanyholman4028" The Judge was post". Can you please explain?

[@jonathanfornwalt4919]

This oxygen thief should have gotten 30 days for contempt every time he repated his "jurisdiction" question. He either really has no idea what "jurisdiction" means or he's being willfully obstinate to delay as much as possible.

[@timber9705]

If they can't understand jurisdiction, then they cannot represent themselves. Simple. All judges should shut this down immediately.

[@christiangauthier727]

I just wanted to say a huge thank you to the person who gifted me a Membership! I received it even though I'm on Mobile and that I wasn't on a Live! Thanks again!

[@JasonP6339]

Well worth it on Mike's channel. He's given me years of almost daily content and is literally the only "lawtube" type person I know of that stayed completely out of national/world politics and also stayed completely out of the "lawtube" politics drama going on.....

[@lizaltman1200]

You are very welcome, Christian! It's a great channel. Happy Thanksgiving!

[@darcibennett9061]

She is playing with him for too long. Why? It's so ridiculous how long they let this go on and on and on.

[@courtney4173]

Probably so they have no chance of getting an appeal. They have to be sure to give them as many chances as possible. It's frustrating though lol

[@JLova82]

It's because you're wrong, all of you. You all have a wrongheaded approach toward all of this in that, there are half-truths to what's being said. Just because it doesn't jive with the Law-&-Order, Judge Judy, sensationalistic TV version of what you believe law should be or is, does not mean that certain concepts used by [sovereign citizens] aren't apropos. Sometimes

[@Soup69God]

​@JLova82 you're a moron and incorrect.

[@MightBeWrong]

"I'm in charge. I get to do sh*t you don't get to do." is a great drop lol

[@JLova82]

He's not in charge of anything unless he produces a public oath or private letters.

[@MightBeWrong]

@JLova82 lol

[@JLova82]

@@MightBeWrong I concur, it's hilarious how you still believe you're going to get away with the fraud!

[@MightBeWrong]

@@JLova82 if he wasn't in charge, just leave. You can't, which means he's literally in charge. Keep on being stupid.

[@Boyso5407]

I could watch this whole thing on a loop all day long. It’s a classic

[@KendraAndTheLaw]

It's delicious

[@Katrina-qs2rl]

I agree completely! Oakley in particular, but all are great.

[@snowysnowyriver]

My favourite judge!! Judge Oakley is incredible. I watched him dealing with someone who had genuinely fallen on very hard times. While he had to enforce the law, Judge Oakley then went a hundred extra miles to help the guy get on his feet. Oakley is the best.

[@QueenOf98596]

It must be the first rule of being a SovCit to never answer a question directly

[@JLova82]

No one does, if you'll pay close attention to lawyers, politicians, judges, bureaucrats etc.

[@ninabean100]

The first rule of sovcit club is to tell everyone you’re in sovcit club…

[@ShadowService]

It kind of is actually. They live on the idea that as long as they follow their script *exactly* and word their answers a specific way it makes them immune to the system. (Though in a lot of these they seems to spend more time in prison running their script - even if eventually charges are dropped or they are found innocent - than if they'd just followed legal process normally.) For a number of them I can see why they grasp at that straw though: People with criminal histories that aren't interested in "shaping up" trying to get around legal restrictions their past shenanigans have placed on them: (1) Can't have a driver's license any more - I'll "travel" instead since that doesn't need a license, (2) can't register a car/get insurance - I "travel" in an "off-road conveyance" so no need for registration/insurance, (3) jail time if I have a gun - if I can argue that's commercial/civil crime then it's just a fine not jail so I'll do that, (4) getting evicted for non-payment of rent/mortgage - I have sovereign immunity/adverse possession/police don't have jurisdiction to get me out, etc. Basically, for those people, they are completely screwed and know it. They're going for the "Hail Mary' approach hoping to delay long enough to have things dropped as too costly in time/money to proceed, hoping for prosecution to eventually make an error among the constant paperwork and delays to legally support a dismissal, hoping that something they throw at the wall sticks and helps them, or - for some - just making things at annoying and difficult as possible for judges/lawyers as a sort of petty vengeance against a system they hate.

[@bronwynhughes2839]

It never ceases to amaze me that these sov cit folks pit themselves against the experienced and educated members of the judicial system.

[@roganjosh7298]

Currently set for jury trial. 1/21/2025 Jury Trial (9:00 AM) Prentis Edwards

[@stephannel414]

You are a saint! putting it on my calendar!

[@spencerbrown6238]

I can't add this to a British calendar as it only has 12 months. What would the 21st month be called?

[@karmahappensboom7031]

@@spencerbrown6238lMAO it’s January 21, 2025

[@roganjosh7298]

@@spencerbrown6238 I'm British too but copied from the US website. To answer your question I think the 21st month would be icosihenember.

[@seabhac7147]

Thank you for the heads up. I, definitely, will mark my calendar for this the next round.

[@Oi....]

Why can't they just keep finding him in contempt, 30days - court, contempt, 30days - court, contempt - so he spends the rest of his life in prison, but more importantly, proving jurisdiction.

[@annelynch9217]

One Judge “rehabilitated” somebody doing that. he just kept putting him in jail, at every hearing,for probably two years. By the time the judge was done with him, he had a complete understanding of how the REAL justice system works. Needless to say, he knew he was fighting an argument. He was never gonna win and he decided to straighten up and fly right like a responsible citizen.

[@Animatrocityy]

It would have been HILARIOUS if the judge had found no probable cause because then he would have spent 30 days in jail only for being a dumbass, when he could have gotten off scot-free if he had shut his mouth and let his lawyer handle it. 😅

[@davident1]

Mohamed Mohamed's parents have shown a distinct lack of effort in their naming duties.

[@ronniek.6393]

😂😂😂

[@davident1]

@@ronniek.6393 😂

[@JLova82]

Why's that?

[@davident1]

@@JLova82 Mohamed Mohamed

[@daveray44]

Let's see. George Foreman comes to mind!

[@karenlittle5125]

This man needed a forensic psych exam because he’s off his rocker for the record and for the record and for the record I’m sure it’s in the jurisdiction lol lol

[@roberthicks5454]

"I object because I could be held accountable."

[@calinasagilitypartner4444]

That could be a quote from the movie Liar Liar

[@azthekid5175]

If it’s A Commercial Crime, How come I didn’t get PAID for Being Part of the Commercial? 🤪🙄🤣🤣🤣

[@lizaltman1200]

Yea uh commercial as in commerce.😂

[@K-9-force]

It never ceases to amaze me the depths of stupidity that can be reached by people....

[@Tindometari]

I responded to this comment by repeating a well-known quote regarding the difference between exceptional intelligence and exceptional lack of same being that exceptional intelligence has limits. Nothing in that comment could be even faintly be construed as offensive to anyone ... but KZbin's delete bots killed that comment in a heartbeat. KZbin, your effort to regulate speech has reduced itself to complete absurdity. You are not teaching anybody anything this way, because nobody on Earth can figure out what it is possible to say without angering the KZbin gods. All it looks like now is random, indiscriminate punishment. Give it up.

[@Kelly-pg1yf]

Love Judge Oakley, he can stop a bs bulldozer in its tracks by talking it out without losing control of the conversation.

[@cynthiamc99]

How did she not know as a judge what she was walking into? She’s letting him run this show… Bring back 1st judge!

[@recumbentkoala]

What I would say as judge "I can explain it to you all day. But I can't comprehend (almost said understand) it for you. Your failure to comprehend is YOUR failure, and not the fault of the court. This is why you should have a lawyer. They can comprehend this on your behalf. Your rejection of competent counsel is, again, YOUR failure. The court needs make no more allowances for your deficiency of comprehension. Everyone else here understands these matters. So we will proceed, to stop wasting their time, in the, perhaps forlorn, hope that you will catch up."

[@stephannel414]

THIS!!!! You took the words out of my keyboard

[@Pink.andahalf]

You would get through maybe three of those sentences before they would start running their mouth to try and talk over you.

[@JLova82]

Yeah, well, you're not

[@Katrina-qs2rl]

This one is a gem of glorious awful. Thanks Mike!

[@gigib8849]

“Glorious awful.” I need to remember that.

[@mhcassidy4829]

I wish the Public Defender would have tapped out when he was told he wasn't wanted. BUT, NO! He keeps trying to bail this idiot out of the deep holes he digs!

[@sarahchews9353]

I give him props for his patience. He’s definitely doing his due diligence as an attorney. I kind of wonder if he’s stuck around just to see what happens. I mean if you have the time and means, why not? I’m sure he’s probably getting paid to do it.

[@kirikayumura6015]

I figured the only reason he stayed around during the hearing before Oakley is because he wanted to watch the show. But him showing up to the subsequent hearings and being ready to take over, on the spot, once the defendant gave up, really was showing some dedication. Dedication to the concept that even an idiot deserves a competent defense if they allow for one.

[@llaph]

6:52 I love, after everything Judge Oakley says, there’s a silent “jackass “floating around after he’s done speaking. he doesn’t say it… but it could fit there quite nicely.

[@Ben-ph7pv]

My favorite was when he asks if he ever had a grilled cheese

[@brendapatt7712]

Jurisdiction is either white rabbit or rainbow unicorn, I demand you tell me which.

[@dianakain0922]

Perfect!

[@AWICKEDVIXEN1999]

😅😂❤🎉😅😢😢😂

[@JLova82]

Jurisdiction is three forms, personal, territorial, subject-matter. If the [judge] can't perfect them, they don't have it.

[@soggybiscotti8425]

White rabbits exist though. I guess if we were in the matrix.... wouldn't be surprised if this dude is subscribed to Tate's hustlers university.

[@mattbasford6299]

​@JLova82 the way I know the court has jurisdiction is that he was in the court at the appointed time and spent 30 days in jail for being an idiot.

[@mickeybugh]

I wish just one time, they would have a hearing, and everyone would literally ignore everything the sov cit is saying. While proceeding with the hearing like he’s not even there 😂😂😂😂

[@Lokisdottir1964]

Judge Slavin did that to someone - I think it was one of the times Eric Martin was in front of him.

[@buck9668]

I wish, instead, that judges would briefly explain the fallacy of the sovcit claim, then crack down hard if the sovcit argues or repeats himself. If the sovcit hasn't submitted his claim in a written motion that the prosecutor can research, judge must insist, before trial, that he do so. (Judge Aaron Gauthier did this with sovcit Trevor MacLeod.) To prevent this dangerous movement from spreading even further, it's important that as many of us as possible be able to expose it for what it is: a massive hoax.

[@buck9668]

For example, the defendant claims: “According to 27 CFR 72.11, all crimes are commercial. So I need you to elaborate on this code for me, please.” The judge should answer something like: “CFR Section 72 does not state that ‘all crimes are commercial.’ "It contains a list of crimes (including possession of deadly weapons) considered commercial only in the context of property seized by Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms officers as subject to forfeiture under federal laws. “The UCC is only a RECOMMENDED civil code with no force of law except when regulating federal employees. UCC provisions in general govern ONLY COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS, and, even then, ONLY WHEN ENACTED BY A STATE LEGISLATURE AS A STATUTE. "No state has passed a law stating all crimes are commercial, or that possession of a deadly weapon is a commercial crime. "For that reason, 27 CFR 72.11 has no relevance to criminal prosecution, which is why neither you, nor anyone else, has ever shown that it does."

[@buck9668]

It's likely that a significant number of viewers of these hearings are what I call the sovcit-curious: Folks with open minds who are genuinely confused about whether sovcit claims might be true. When sovcits are simply shut down with no explanation, it makes it look like sovcit gurus are right that judges HAVE no answers.

[@jaykay1053]

@@buck9668 ​​⁠​⁠ I agree with this and your examples. I think the schools are doing a very good job teaching how to critically assess a source for its legitimacy. But not everyone is an ‘A’ student, sigh. Do you know if any police, lawyers, schools and/or libraries are partnering to offer public interest legal seminars to: dispel the traffic law & court procedure myths; correct the misuse of vocabulary; and untangle the civil/criminal/case law/constitution-related disinformation? Are we too late?

[@michellestrickland7613]

We, the People are the injured party!

[@IANCHARLES1965]

Especially after having to listen his circular endless BS arguments!!! 😮😮

[@schwabrichard9829]

I just found this, Michaux trial 1/21/2025 Jury Trial (9:00 AM) Prentis Edwards

[@LawTalkWithMike]

Interesting

[@Jason_Scott]

Amazing that this clown has managed to drag this out this long. I’m guessing it would be asking too much that he’s been in custody the entire time.

[@darkwolf1200]

love when they have no mics at all and its just whispers. great job court system.

[@goatboy-l3d]

Even though I've seen this before, it's worth watching again. Oakley is my favorite judge. All judges should be required to watch this!

[@michellestrickland7613]

They should really be charged and forced to pay for the whole case while they waste everyone's time.

[@randalljones137]

Martin was found guilty. Of course he objected to the verdict 😂😂

[@afishynado6812]

Imagine all that heartache and misery / fun and frivolity could have been avoided if he hadn't parked in a no parking zone.

[@emmapeel4299]

Oh my goodness. This is delicious. No I’ve never seen this before and it’s absolutely worth it. Thanks, Mike!

[@pamelatavarez3987]

“I present myself” 🤦🏾‍♀️

[@Lokisdottir1964]

Like a bonobo.

[@sarahchews9353]

With a bow 😂

[@LorieHaag-rt5ze]

Got his sovshit in a row

[@Pink.andahalf]

As dumb as it sounds, they think that a lawyer "re presents" a person, and thus the person "presents" themselves.

[@Kelly-pg1yf]

Like a southern debutante!

[@rolltide_rhiannon]

The sound quality is horrible. Can't hear anything 😢

[@mzglo7588]

Re: the prosecutor 's haircut....that was the only size of bowl handy. Give him a break!

[@heatherr296]

Sov cits are amusing in their ignorance, but they get annoying pretty quickly unless they’re in front of a judge like Oakley.

[@Tread1775]

The attorneys name is Mohammad Moped Mohammad. His nickname is Mo, hence the haircut. He grew up enjoying the Three Stooges. It’s a long story, but that’s the jist.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

😂

[@Tindometari]

I wonder if he has a middle name and whether that middle name is "Mohammed". You know, kind of like Major Major Major from *Catch-22.*

[@jan-erikwahlberg2791]

Is everyone required to repeat "for the record" in every sentence?

[@TheresaTinnick]

I love whenever they claim "I'm a living man." Good, cuz everyone else in this coutroom is a living dead zombie or a corpse.

[@bigal5269]

It always gets me. They sure have a different definition for the jurisdiction and they are so far off on what they think that means.

[@dewc52]

What they say that they have a Constitional Right to ask them to cite that part of the Constitution. They do have a right to know "cause and nature." But that is not jurisdiction. And a right to face their accuser (not their victim.) Generally the location of the incident and the stature numbers are listed on the ticket. The judge need only point to those to answer their questions. It is clearly laid out on the ticket. Finally as to the "common law or admiralty" argument, the Constitution list more then just those two. "The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;--to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;--to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;--to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;--to Controversies between two or more States;--between a State and Citizens of another State;--between Citizens of different States;--between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects." Plus all of those are areas BESIDES its own power over the Statutory Law codified under the Constitution. It is Statutary Law (with the stature numbers listed) against which they are charged.

[@Tindometari]

Sovvery is all about manipulating words in an attempt to cast verbal magic spells. So, among many other things, sovs try to either redefine the word 'jurisdiction' in a way that they find convenient -- or try to obfuscate the term into meaninglessness. But as J Rooke of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench wrote in *Meads v. Meads* ... "Their magic spells, when cast, fail."

[@user-in7bm9fu5u]

The way sovcits keep repeating "fer thu rekkur" after every sentence, sometimes multiple times per sentence, is driving me nuts. Pardon, traveling me nuts.

[@kschwitter]

What a delightful start to my Thursday morning. Thanks, Mike!

[@OhGawdHesGotAGun]

Oakley is my favorite of all time. Perfectly specific, just the right amount of attitude, and he doesn't allow the sov-cit to dictate the proceedings. Now there is one I saw recently where a sov-cit tries to get a public defender to push the sov-cit tripe, and he gets both barrels from the lawyer - every humiliation and insult that a sov-cit deserves. It's incredible and I will look for it again soon. All the things that a judge isn't allowed to say in court, this lawyer tells him. Most of the other judges are insanely cowardly for not finding them in contempt. The second judge is insultingly passive & it's offensive to the others on the Zoom.

[@kellymarie923]

Re- pre- sent and up- un -under 😅😅😅

[@davident1]

Mr. Sullivan definitely got an A+ in his college course "Beating A Dead Horse" . LOL

[@davident1]

I don't think the "In Custody" matters to him. It is pretty evident that he doesn't work for a living or he would be asking to be released or would have not gotten the Contempt Violation in the first placed.

[@colleenmoylan4214]

It’s hilarious seeing you get all bent out of shape over the tight pants 😂

[@TbirdMan]

...and that's how we spend an inordinate amount of time to establish that some guy was illegally parked with a gun in his car. Maybe we are grinding exceedingly, excessively fine?

[@glynncordry5965]

"by a felon" , "habitual". This isn't his first rodeo, or his second or third. He just needs to be locked up.

[@wensday21]

Someone tell Mr Sullivan that Ted Bundy wants his clothes back.

[@DragonLinkIsOverrated]

I don't understand why none of these judges respond with "It isn't clear that this court lacks jurisdiction."

[@Tindometari]

I'd love to see a judge explain that this is the court of general jurisdiction, that it has jurisdiction over all legal matters in its territory by default unless that jurisdiction has been assigned elsewhere by statute, and that the only way to successfully claim that this court lacks jurisdiction is to identify another court that *does* have jurisdiction. But that would probably fall in the area of dispensing legal advice from the bench.

[@makeminetexas3494]

Dang, Mike, I’m glad you were confused, too, because I thought this was the trial. I also thought at one point he’d left the courtroom because he was quiet for so long.

[@passinthru5992]

My issue is these folks are guilty,they know they are guilty,they just refuse to take responsibility for their actions. Sometimes a person just needs man up. IMHO

[@STORMY0O]

Because the offense of the weapon is like to see Federal Charges on him. His feckless questions have been answered. Go back to jail. Denied done deal go back to jail, buddy! The Attorneys know this will be all afternoon they brought popcorn and snacks.

[@RVsbladesnthangs]

7:58 YOU'RE PROBABLY GOING TO HEAR MORE THAN ONE😆🤣

[@TheUluxian]

All a jurisdiction is is an area between certain boundaries on a map, just like a restaurants delivery area... It really is that simple....

[@KellieJK]

You get a bond, you get a bond! Everybody gets a bond! Woohoo!!

[@DrunkenSmurf]

I don't think I've ever mentally applauded so hard as much as I did when Oakley gave him 30 days contempt on top of the $100 he fined him. Re: the haircut. That's a high and tight bowl cut, which has grown out a bit. It was very popular among ethnic military members back in the late 1980's for its resemblance to "the fade" worn by civilians (google images search Kidd n Play sometime for a very tall example of a fade cut.)

[@cherillbaber6136]

Agreed!!!

[@OldSalty22]

People don't give a hoot how they look anymore

[@kato1126]

Love Judge Oakley❤

[@ericadwyer5618]

Can you imagine if he was the judge in the Darrell Brooks trial?

[@avatarvirtuallearning4963]

You know he really doesn't believe the crap he's spewing, whether he's trying to delay and get the charges dropped (likely) or just want to be annoying he is succeeding. They really should just throw him in jail and keep doing it until he stops this sh?!#@t. Thirty days at a time and after a while he'll finally give up and start taking responsibility for his actions instead of trying to claim laws don't apply to him.

[@michellestrickland7613]

What Jurisdiction are you operating up under Mike?

[@denisemarsh8725]

"My testimony is that you didn't subpoena the tow tag listing all this idiot's crap, and I'm not here to testify he had sunglasses and bubblegum. The crime was the possession of the gun."

[@suchasweety138]

I would love a video explaining what these sovereign citz mean when they ask if the jurisdiction is amenity or whatever they're trying to say.

[@jan_vyhnak]

If admiralty law is mentioned more than three times you are obligated to play love boat clip!

[@sueseaton7619]

I wish someone could stop him from saying, "for the record". He must think those are magic words.

[@edwardgates6364]

The facts of the case remind me of what a friend who lived in Detroit briefly told me about the airport, namely that you went through a metal detector coming off the plane & if it didn't beep they handed you a gun

[@winstonsmith2663]

Law aside, I’m always fascinated by a sovcits inability to “read the room”. Like, if I had read something dumb online that I believed, but then in court everything I tried kept running into a brick wall, I would probably be sweating and inside I would be like oh crap none of this working, somethings wrong. I would not be like “well the first twenty times I brought up jurisdiction didn’t work, but I’m sure the next one will!”

[@sassyfootnote]

He should be fined for every single time he says jurisdiction. I wish this second judge would say if you don’t understand then you need an attorney. She let this shit go on waaaay too long

[@daveglass7396]

The second judge should not have let him repeat himself so often just find him in contempt again

[@TifaneeShante]

Not everyone is rude

[@CleverNerdPun]

I love this judge so much.

[@th3angry_redhead72]

Me too! He's hilarious. I'd love to hang out with him for a day LOL

[@NEprimo]

Mike is the "elderly man yells at clouds" meme

[@MarkLamprecht]

If you say “for the record” 800 times in court, that validates everything you say!

[@noellumex7555]

for the record >>> repeatedly said is on the record

[@bagitson]

This judge really needs to get control of her courtroom. There is no answer that she can give that the sky is going to agree to, and so she should just employ measures like what they did in the Brooks matter and proceed without him.

[@Omniterra88]

Do you think that a part of the script that sov cits learn says something like, “and make sure that you say, ‘for the record’ enough times that if someone made a 5 min drinking game on it, they would die of alcohol poisoning.”?

[@janallman4845]

So… he went up in there to Det airport, parked in no parking and left the car with a pistol in it🤦‍♀️. Genius

[@schwabrichard9829]

Is this the guy who parked his car and just went into the airport? They find his car, do the inventory and find the gun as part of the towing. I thought he was found guilty?

[@butterbeantx]

Yup!

[@FollowingfromafarBooth-jz4jq]

Apparently he left a firearm in full view in the vehicle. Another person saw it and reported it. The police traced ownership from the vehicle to this fool. He is a felon, not allowed to be on possession of a firearm. So he just left a gun out in the open ( visually ) in his car. 🤦‍♀️

[@germanshepherd6638]

That was the biggest word salad ever

[@billchmelik5697]

I have broken records that don't annoy me as much as this looneytoon

[@ALLCAPSENTITY]

Judges never seem to tell a Sov Cit “you can stop saying ‘for the record’ every time you talk, this is all on the record, I’ll tell you if and when we go off the record”. I wish they would set them straight on that point as it’s so annoying hearing that phrase every sentence.

[@LaninThomasma]

It's part of the magic incantation. You have to keep repeating "for the record" for the spell to protect you. It's like Snape muttering under his breath at that quiddich match.