Star Trek Online: Vo'Devwl Class Carrier - Official Breakdown

[@Spacedock]

Play Star Trek Online Free: www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online

[@sithisarcanis]

I haven’t watched it yet. More STO videos!!!

[@IAmTheAce5]

Any chance of covering the Emissary Star Cruiser?

[@carnsoaks1]

BS. A vessel over 1k long and near half as thick should have a crew complement of close to ten thousand, not two. It's supposed to have drop-ship capability and command facilities. Be reall.

[@telekbalazskristof]

YES PLEASE! i really liked the game as a kid and it has so much to offer i hope youll do more vids w them

[@Admiral-tz1sp]

Make a video on the Chimera class Heavy Destroyer

[@ODST_Parker]

If only she could carry that many weapons and auxiliary craft in the game. So happy to see you doing STO ships, can't wait to see more! The Jupiter, Odyssey, and Avenger/Arbiter class ships have become some of my favorite Starfleet ships in all of Star Trek, and there are many other unique designs in this game that are worth the passion and effort you put into your analysis.

[@jasonwalker9471]

Oh, so that isn't the ingame support craft complement. That makes sense. I haven't played since before the Klingon expansion came out, and I was stunned that they'd have a carrier with that many fighters (or whatever). Seemed overpowered, heh.

[@ODST_Parker]

@@jasonwalker9471 You CAN have two birds of prey and 36 fighters (two frigates or six "squadrons" of fighters per hangar bay) deployed at once, but the shuttles are not part of its in-game capacity.

[@glitterboy2098]

@@ODST_Parker yeah, the game mechanics basically ignore the standard shuttlebay on ships, and the support craft inside. it occasionally pops up as part of a mission level or cutscene but basically the shuttlebay has no game mechanic to it. carrier classe of ships though have hanger bays which you can slot in combat pets though. Frigates are basically small starships, fighters are basically swarms of combat shuttles, and there are heavy fighters (liek the Delta Flyer) which are basically in between.. tougher than fighters but not as tough as frigates, and use smaller number of fighters per bay. these new carriers add fourth version, the fighter squadron. normally fighters only spawn 6 pets (3 per spawn command), frigates 2 (1 per command) and heavy fighters 4 (2 per command) the new squadrons pets are the same as the standard fighters but you can have 36 of them out a time, basically 6 fighters acting like one of ther old types. the overall stats are basically the same (the health and damage is spread out so that basically only 1 fighter out of a 6 fighter group is attacking at any given time, and you lose fighters from a 6 plane group as you take damage rather than a single fighter taking damage to their shields and hull) but it looks a lot more impressive, and it makes the overall unit of fighters a bit tougher to kill since they are spread out more.

[@sleipnirodin2881]

@@ODST_Parker Sorry , but i must say that... Your Icon' ... *U.N.S.C. Boo yah!*

[@Truex007]

@@ODST_Parker You could always use the boarding party Boff ability, but few do because of it's history of being underpowered, and not as useful as the mergency power abilities or a hull heal. But that WOULD use the shuttles that are part of a ships standard compliment.

[@frydaddy1535]

No joke, I could watch an entire channel dedicated to Star Trek online ships. Sad that a game did a better job making us care about the ships then Star Trek Picard

[@keller1334]

Or STD😢

[@rahbaralhaq]

There is Trekyards.

[@Paleorunner2]

I completely agree

[@DimoB8]

@Avery Christy Star Trek (and star wars) have always been political, they just got worse at delivering it in a subtle way

[@matthewburdick4966]

@Avery Christy Every time someone suggests that Star Trek hasn't always had a "social agenda" the ghost of Gene Roddenberry bleeds from its fucking eyeballs.

[@ZyvorgAntares]

Sweet, STO breakdowns? I've been hoping you'd do these.

[@justindurante2554]

You definitely should do breakdowns on the ships of Star Trek Online, particularly the 25th century successors of classic ships. Examples I have in mind are the Narendra Class (successor to the Ambassador Class), the Reliant class (Successor to the Miranda Class), the Odyssey Class and it's sister classes (in particular the Yorktown Class, the ship class of the Enterprise-F), The Bortasqu' Class and it's sister class, and many more.

[@jasonwalker9471]

He's done the Odyssey class, I think.

[@kevingriffith6011]

I feel like carrier craft are simultaneously rendered redundant by Star Trek's technology while also given a lot of opportunities that aren't really explored very well. The way weapons are presented in trek makes them seem like they have almost 100% perfect accuracy with projectiles that travel roughly the speed of light, so the traditional space-based fighter craft would be a sitting duck without extremely overpowered shields for a ship of it's type. That being said, a carrier loaded up with industrial transporters in lieu of traditional launch facilities would be quite a sight. It could literally beam fighter craft into the enemy's blind-spots or instantly rescue any damaged fighter craft before they can be destroyed. Making the craft highly modular could allow damaged craft to be transported back and quickly refitted with replicated components or even re-assembled in the pattern buffers of the carrier itself. Naturally the demand for energy and materials in such a craft would be immense, though, so the space savings on things like launch tubes and hangar space would probably be taken up with additional power generation and cargo space... but it would certainly be the most impressive carrier in science fiction to see in action.

[@TheCJUN]

Carriers could carry thousands of smaller AI drones, to overwhel opponents.

[@cgi2002]

Interesting idea, but there is a key flaw. Industrial transporters, like all transporters don't work in conjunction with sheilds. Both the fighters and the carrier would need their sheilds to be down for this to work, that is frankly suicidal in battle unless you have defiant style hull plating, or a borg magnetic field. Your right though, fighters in star trek are pointless vs any faction with beam weapons. They are pinpoint accurate at huge ranges, with outputs that are devistating. Fighters without warp drives lack the power output to have suitable shields to be of value, as the warp core is essentially a huge power generator. The extention to this is also, those same fighters if they can't generate shields strong enough to be of value, definitely can't generate enough energy for their own weapons to be effective, unless they are armed exclusively with torpedoes. The only exception to this, is if your using swarm tactics against an opponent with no area of effect weapons. You'll take massive losses, but can chip away at an enemy over time. Realistically in a scifi environment were sheilds & advanced targetting exist, fighters have no value except defensively to intercept missiles. Offensively, lose the fighters and just send missiles. Even in modern combat, most aircraft serve as a munitions delivery system, if you can find a cheap efficient way to skip the middle man, you should, especially if the middle man is not expendable.

[@TheCJUN]

@@cgi2002 Good points, I was thinking using the drones like decoys/flares to draw fire and also as kenetic weapons. But since force shield cannot be penetrated in ST (other than energy weapons), that might seem totally ineffective.

[@cgi2002]

@@TheCJUN as I say, at that point, replace your drones with torpedoes, use those. They don't even need to be directly targeted at a ship, you can use them like drones. Fly them around, force the ship to either destroy or avoid them, or just swarm a ship with them. Few ships can survive a dozen torpedoes hitting them at once, shields or not.

[@kevingriffith6011]

@@cgi2002 I can imagine a way that fighters could be useful in Star-Trek style ship to ship combat, but it's certainly not the traditional method. I imagine that even though the range on beam-type energy weapons is quite long, eventually that energy will disperse into space. Pulse-based weapons like the Defiant's Phasers are likely significantly longer range, as are most munitions, so it's in that range just outside of beam effectiveness that you'd see "bomber" type fighters loaded with torpedoes, and to deal with those I could see a purpose for interceptor type fighters, allowing the larger capital ship to keep at a safe distance while dealing with any fighter attack. Of course, this doesn't take into account medium-sized ships or anything of that manner and makes a lot of assumptions about star trek weapons... but that's my take. Edit for clarity: Essentially I'm talking about using bombers to extend the range and firing rate of torpedoes: you can only launch as many torpedoes at a time as you have launch tubes after all.

[@syran7848]

As a long time STO player, I'm thrilled to see STO content on the channel.

[@briankriens5645]

Same here.

[@Vespuchian]

One of the better looking Klingon ships, I like the 'rounded brick' aesthetic that screams 'unstoppable force' without trying to look scary by putting spikes all over it or trying to make it look like it's made of knives. Having played some of the Klingon campaign in STO I am still baffled how the Klingon Empire remains as a functional government, what with all the assassination-based promotion systems, constant in-fighting between clans/houses, and the shocking willingness to commit war crimes if it means you get to stab a guy later "for honour". Maybe I just don't understand Klingons.

[@3Rayfire]

Klingons are weird like that. While the assassination based system and requirement of war seems like it would cause collapse regularly, it actually helps to clear out the trash. It also a system of actually killing off corrupt and cowardly individuals. In times of peace traitors like Duras rise to power without really accomplishing anything, corrupt politics is the order of the day. Since superiors can only be killed for showing cowardice in battle situations or in formal challenges opportunities to kill the corrupt outside of battle are rare. As for all of the things that aren't glorious but need to be done for a society to function low ranked Klingons do those, and get no honor for it, and no respect. They consider it effective with a "steel sharpens steel" mindset, but it wasn't always like this. The rise of the warrior class only happened within the last three or four centuries according to Enterprise.

[@kinggoten]

@@3Rayfire its loosely based off the samuari culture, but it also keeps them from being a real power because they always have some sort of internal issue going on, even during the dominion war they still fight each other just as much as the dominion... and while we never see it(in the shows/movies) I do expect some in the lower classes do get respect like the ship designers etc.. I honestly kind of feel like the romulan system of everyone is planing behind your back is even less sustainable because with the klingons you know where the person next to you stands because they are very up front with their intent, romulans will just stab you in the back for said promotion and all that miss trust does not suit a military focused empire, maybe thats why we never got a real romulan war because they would be back stabbing each other so much that the feds would just stomp them.

[@3Rayfire]

@@kinggoten Actually in the episode of TNG where we met the Ferengi scientist Reyga, we met Kurak a Klingon scientist...who was pissed off, Crusher speculated that Klingon scientists don't get much respect. The Klingons are United usually if they have a strong enough opponent to fight. There was little infighting during the Dominion Ear, just Gowron being a glory hound...which got him killed...as is supposed to happen to corrupt Klingons. But their sustainability had to be purely based on the work of the commoner underclass.

[@TurKlack]

To be honest I don't think they really mean honor as we would perceive it. Well I'm currently only guessing and have no base or context to draw from I wouldn't be aurprised if the Klingons use "Honor" as a Smokescreen to lead outsiders away from their true nature Afterall from what I have heard from hearsay the Klingons are surprisingly effective and capable spies.

[@simonwillis1529]

Sweet I hope we get the other carriers

[@Xenophaige_reads]

If they do they need to have the Valkyrie from star trek starfighter game. (Not sure if that was its actual name, as I played it so long ago)

[@draco84oz]

The Jupiter-Class is only full Federation carrier in STO so far (there are other Dreadnoughts and Flight Deck Cruisers, but they don't really count), but there are the Catian carriers as well - a new one was introduced with this set of support carriers. Although I was kinda hoping for another Federation designed carrier. But who knows, maybe the Valkyrie-Class will show up eventually.

[@briankriens5645]

New support carriers are a lot of fun. I'd like to see more.

[@mikesaporitojr3313]

I hope so to it would be grate to see the lore behind the other factions new carriers

[@BCosby423]

STO and Spacedock? Hell yeah, one of my favorite games mixed with one of my favorite youtubers.

[@simongensheimer9564]

looks like the Klingons wanted to build their own "Event Horizon" I like the design of this ship quite well. Nice ship! I'd like to see more ships from STO. Nice job!!

[@alexion2001]

Definitely more STO canon breakdowns! Been playing since launch and I can say the game is in a need of a review, glad you're showing support.

[@briankriens5645]

ditto

[@c6tom790]

Definitely do more of these. I have played STO since 2012 and your breakdowns are always great. This is a match made in heaven for me. The video helped push me to make my purchase.

[@adambielen8996]

That is a beautiful and very Klingon ship. So yes I'd like to see more.

[@Velkeem]

That thing looks like a gods damned space tank. And with redundant cores no less. Id expect nothing less from the Klingons

[@mathewprime]

Ooooh yes.. As a STO Veteran I want more of this.

[@fathomwild2224]

I would really enjoy your channel covering STO ships. I can't get enough of every ship of every IP.

[@roblapekas1536]

Awesome. Did something like this when I was 12 playing a space based paper dice game. No where as cool though. So good to see a multi warp core ship that is all encompassing as a carrier. Great content and collaboration!

[@shadowpheonix787]

I support this idea, and as a carrier captain in sto I feel honored you chose my ship class to start with. Looking forward to seeing more of these.

[@rubbengr1]

Great job. I hope this collaboration continues. As a long time STO player and space dock fan, this may help one decide on acquiring or not acquiring a specific ship in game, while also supplying some very interesting lore regarding the ship's history.

[@RememberTheChase]

This is exactly the content I want to see! Been waiting for this.

[@TroyPacelli]

If the name of the class is supposed to be "From the Chancellor," then it should be is a verb meaning "go." So means something like "You go, Chief."

[@ShamelessMcBundy]

It's the Klingon Empire's answer to the Cardassian Hutet class.

[@MrPatrick2160]

Very Good!! I've been waiting to get these Support Carriers on my next payday! Great to see this kind of content and collaboration!!

[@lanantz]

God's yes please, do more of these!!!! I have the ship in game, this just made it feel way more real. Please do one for the romulan carrier.

[@TysonR33]

So many more like this!! PLEASE! getting actual Trek info on these ships seems impossible sometimes, to hear actual lengths, dimensions, and equipment is so awesome!

[@94DaveID]

Well done... Now I want to download and play Star Trek Online again. :D

[@gavinratima8122]

This latest Klingon Ship of the Imperial Klingon Defense Force has that don't mess with me look about it,large and very powerful I'm a big fan of Star Trek and i hope to see more in the future

[@briankriens5645]

You should see the Romulan variant of the support carrier. I don't know which one looks more menacing.

[@gavinratima8122]

@@briankriens5645 You've seen the Romulan version what's it like I've never seen it yet

[@Timjer92]

The Vo'Devwl (thanks for teaching how to pronounce it) is certainly my favorite among the carriers introduced in STO recently. Thanks for this cool video.

[@Madalaskan01]

Don't get me wrong, I'm happy to see breakdowns like this especially with Star Trek Online (I mean, that's just a no-brainer), but I'd love to hear your thoughts on its design.

[@Boki10]

I hate how STO got rid of the crew number indicator it showed how many of the crew died or were wounded in an engagement. I loved imagining myself sending letters to the families of the slain about how bravely they fought I hope they bring it back.

[@TheCraziestFox]

Weren't they holograms anyway?

[@TiganWelsh]

@@TheCraziestFox Mostly holograms, yeah. I still miss it too, though, because for a while I was running the T5 Olympic and part of that ship's whole thing was that, being a hospital ship, it had faster crew regeneration.

[@TeraQuad]

I love these breakdowns of ships.

[@boingthegoat7764]

Ah, my two guilty nerd pleasures, joined like chocolate and peanut butter

[@kthlars]

Awesome! As a long time STO RPer, I greatly enjoyed this breakdown and look forward to more!

[@jamesgross6921]

Between the upgraded graphics and the STO content, I absolutely need more of this!!!

[@danmurgy9125]

More collaborations like this would be enjoyed by many in sure, and its great to finally get some more information on the STO exclusive ships other than the handful of lines most get. I particularly would like to see some videos on the Jem'hadar vanguard range of ships

[@casbot71]

Since you're doing canon Trek ships, one that needs to be done is the *Curiosity class…* Equipped with a camoflauge field that makes it look like _any standard nondescript Starfleet ship._ And apparently the fastest toughest Federation ship ever built, it was made in vast numbers in its first production run with several variants with different nacelles from the outset. Besides it's d̶e̶r̶i̶v̶a̶t̶i̶v̶e̶ iconic design, the *Curiosity class* also keeps up StarFleets tradition of giving innocuous uplifting names to deadly fighting ships.

[@chadwickmccarty4944]

This ship & the other 3 Support Carriers all look really good. They don't have the greatest stats but imo they have decent then good stats with the optional fleet versions. Star Trek Online is a generous free-to-play game. Too bad over the last couple of years it has been saturated with more & more unregulated gambling mechanics.

[@kinggoten]

the gambling is bad, but since victory of life quality content to play has been sparse, the measure of morality bit was great and the one ground tfo.. forget which one the one with the crystals I really enjoyed outside of that its been meh and that is worse then them throwing in more gambling in my opinion because lets be honest you don't have to spend anything on the gambling yes they hide a few interesting ships behind that but there is more then enough ships to choose from in the c-store and they are fairly priced given the amount of free content there is to play

[@briankriens5645]

Like most other MMOs out there. Thankfully one can have a great time in STO with all the free/grind to earn stuff in the game.

[@Kaiju-Driver]

I came to this channel long ago because of videos just like this one. I love this stuff.

[@hoodoowilliams5187]

Yes, please, do more of these. Beauty shots are nice but getting info is nicer.

[@ectogambit]

Being a fighter pilot in the Star Trek universe is a DEATH sentence give how accurate weapons are on larger ships.

[@tba113]

Sometimes. Other times, the gunners manage to completely derp shot after shot and miss thousand-meter-long heavy cruisers moving slowly in straight lines from less than a ship's length away.

[@briankriens5645]

my fighters/frigates seem to survive well enough. FIghter pilots in the 2 World Wars had a pretty high death rate as well, but they didn't have the luxury of emergency beam out which some of the hanger pets announce before they blow up.

[@1Dataluke]

This is something I've wanted for a long time! Please do more

[@PaiSAMSEN]

Even though I'm not a fan of carrier vessel in Star Trek verse, I must admit, this is a good looking ship.

[@shaalis]

When an Earth Alliance Omega bangs a Vor'cha. This is their child.

[@GatchamanG4]

Why you don’t have more subs is a mystery to me. Your channel is always so informative. 🖖🏻

[@brothersgt.grauwolff6716]

Ah another new toy for K'lethur my Klingon character in STO she'll have so much fun 😈

[@DraconX3]

No joke, my Gorn Sahiss captains a Vo'Quv class carrier currently. Would likely have much fun with this one :3

[@wolfwilkopter2231]

While not using any new support Carriers by now, my Romulan Char and his Kopesh Dread have switched to the new Fighter Squadrons and i must say they are fun and the Alpha from 36 of them is not to be underestimated as they all have the abilitys of their normal counterparts, but multiplied by 6, that makes it really hard for my elite drone ships to be the prime craft, apart from them beeing much more durable, the fighters die like flies.^^ but maybe i'll get my Vulcan Sci the new Caitian Sup Carrier, the multimission explorer is nice and the 4 Yellowstones are too, but i could try something new.^^

[@daddybondrewd7271]

thinking of making a klingon character, do they have more agressive skills or?

earth godzilla Klingons do well in ground combat, both ranged and melee. If your looking for space superiority, Romulans have that.

[@kinggoten]

@@daddybondrewd7271 skills are the same for all the races/factions sadly they get unique traits klingons get ground buffs bonus melee/ranged damage etc, if you got the zen/ec alien race characters are mostly the best choice because they get an extra trait slot and many traits from lock boxes are strong depending what your going for.

[@CaneMcKeyton]

Official Star Trek online and Spacedock team up? Hell yeah!

[@crashstudi0s]

I would love to see more ship breakdowns, specially from the Been ships, I love those

[@zenkomenhi]

Fantastic entry sir! I would love to see you take on more of STOs ships like this, for this was just excellent.

[@birdmonster4586]

My Favourite ship in STO is the Pathfinder class. The perfect Progression of the Intrepid class design. I think it really fits the 25h century aesthetic much like the Odyssey class. Tom Marony the designer actually made a little lore PDF about the Pathfinder which is great. I'd love to see a breakdown of Pathfinder for sure.

[@Zamun]

Thanks for the content. Love these collaboration projects

[@raemonrivera8071]

My 1st time here and I’m impressed by the presentation ✊🏾

[@TheFriscoNinja]

This is what I live for. A nice change of pace and content. I would love to see more vids that pertain to STO. Amazing work, God bless and stay safe.

[@ChrisStargazer]

This was a totally and completely AWESOME video! More, please! 👍🏼

[@MandalorV7]

This ship looks beefier than most other Klingon ships.

[@truckfighter7669]

Watching this on a Sunday morning from S.Texas enjoying Coffee and a nice Cigar The Sobremesa Brulee ☕

[@timwheeler7620]

If at all possible I'd love to see your vids on the Odyssey, Avenger, and Arbiter class ships. Love your work, keep it up.

[@edwinmoy1402]

This ship looks like the Hydran carriers from the old Starfleet Command games.

[@Brakiri]

Hey, now that you said it...you are right!

[@schalitz1]

As an STO player I enjoyed this video a lot more please

[@DarthFolo]

I've always liked the DujHod-class. Reminds me of the Al-Kesh from stargate.

[@falloutboy9993]

I hope we get to see the other carriers that were introduced. But it would take a long time to go through every ship in STO.

[@captnrobvious47]

Love it. Would love to see you do more with the folks at STO.

[@jayalexander9119]

Can we see a breakdown of the Star Cruiser class for Star trek online please

[@achasonc]

So enjoying your collaboration with Star Trek Online!🖖

[@pauljankootje3943]

Always nice to see a big Sci-Fi carrier ship, even if star fighters are kind of useless in Star Trek due to the accurate weapons larger ships carry. Nice Breakdown.

[@wraith2294]

Love STO, would love to see more of these from you!

[@Ninjanoto2]

would love to see more STO stuff

[@Technodreamer]

This is great! Would love to see a video on the Jupiter-class carrier.

[@callukcraft]

awesome break down and would love to see you do more STO stuff.

[@kombatace7971]

You: talks about STO Me: Are you really in charge here?

[@Lyze]

STO ship breakdowns, absolutely. STO has done a better job with the lore than CBS has.

[@briankriens5645]

Couldn't agree more.

[@shadow7037932]

Yes! There's some really interesting STO ships. I hope you can keep this going. Heck a lot of these STO ships are nicer/interesting than the ships we got in ST Piccard.

[@larslaufer301]

Please continue this as a series. STO has some awesome ships and I would like to see this kinds of videos for them.

[@daverage4729]

Im getting serious 'Event Horizon' vibes from this baby. Verrry sweet ride!

[@CassianDamonKane]

Would to see more Star Trek Online for sure, escially my favourite ship of them all, the Odyssey class.

[@kinggoten]

pretty sure he did a video on the odyssey class already

[@1Scimetar]

If more of these Star Trek Online lore videos in the works, I'd recommend working with Rick for the Certifiably Ingame. Most of the content is either general Star Trek lore or chapters in a solo Star Trek Online roleplay series that is currently part way through the Iconian War arc.

[@housecoatgaming]

I suggest the Avenger, Odyssey, Dhelan, Haa'pax, Jupiter and Ar'kif for future STO content. The Jupiter is a supercarrier, the Oddy...1701-F. Nuff said. The Dhelan, Haa'pax and Ar'kif are unique Romulan boats and the Avenger is a twist on the standard Starfleet layout. Tying into your Wolf 359 vid, the Lafayette is an update on the New Orleans, which also has the skin for it. The Narendra, too: Probert's baby. And the Yamato-Class, which is a Galaxy-X reskin, would also fit. Maybe you can mention Picard being involved because he remembered All Good Things and that Enterprise-D.

[@nsr-ints]

The warp rushing tactics was first deployed during the Dominion war with the T'Chava Kal class light carrier, in which it, and its BOP escort would independently warp into the minimum weapons efficiency envelope of an enemy ship, barf up fighters, and get out of dodge. However, such a "oversized warp field" design isn't really viable due to the technological limitations of the time.

[@owenlagger]

A breakdown of some of the more iconic warships from the battletech universe would be cool

[@Farlas816]

Very cool to see, hope you do more official sto stuff

[@DanTheYoutubeAddict]

This...is..COOL! Thank you for covering it.

[@gauchplant]

Random, unsolicited suggestion: have you considered doing breakdowns on historic/current ships and planes? I have found that a lot of Sci-fi is based on either current models or historical ones. I would be interested in how you'd breakdown, say the USS Enterprise (CV6) from World War II, or even the more recent Enterprise that was just decommissioned. You could probably even work with a few history/military KZbinrs for both tie-ins and where to find information.

[@frog8220]

While I'm not a big fan of the Star-trek spaceship videos, Daniel saying "Redundancy" makes more than up for it.

[@hectorxbox4258]

The best Klingon ship in star trek online

[@RobertJones-ux6nc]

Never seen nor heard of this class, but was queries about it. Liked watching and seeing what it was.

[@rolandjaycutter3504]

So good to see another carrier in Star Trek.

[@briankriens5645]

Next please feature the Fed, Jem'Hadar, and Romulan Republic carriers. They are all equally worthy of a breakdown by Spacedock.

[@ankylonshadow]

thoroughly enjoy the video, looking forward to more STO ships!

[@markmarano913]

I've actually been considering getting into STO, so I'd love to see more breakdowns of ships from the game!

[@safeguardprime5914]

Personally I'd like to hear about my ship, An Atlas class prototype dreadnaught which I love!

[@captaindraco2286]

This is what I love about Star trek. Descriptive Badassery. Only to blow up 12 minutes later

[@jorixpalorn3738]

Kinda ironic seeing a ship from STO with that many weapons on it, since last time I played even the biggest ships could only hold a maximum of 8 weapons let alone the dozens on display here

[@Galvajon]

By the gods yes, more of this

[@ustrekkie92]

I love these new carriers within the game!!! I feel theses carriers would exist in existing canon after the Dominion War as well, but as it stands they are great addition to the ever growing Star Trek Online canon. Plus they are certainly slow, so that's attention to detail.

[@SonicHalo9107]

I recommend the Mercury Class and sister ships, Alita CLass, Brigid Class and its sister ships, Earhart Class, Chimera/Manticore Class, Concord/Geneva/Presidio Class, and the Odyssey Class and its sister ships.

[@romanlev5603]

Thats a big boy right there... Actually planning on piloting this beast (fleet version) once I get enough fleet ship modules from reputation.

[@Paleorunner2]

That's the best video I've seen in a long time!

[@Sealhunt]

Four warp cores?! Yeah, this thing isn't just huge, its got the power to maximize its potential. What a beast!

[@bolojoe5492]

Very well done I would love to see other STO starships done in the future.

[@navaldock2840]

To be honest I think they did a good job with the design