Your channel is really getting good Stefan! it's not only about POV flying, but it's also about you and your adventures before during and after flying which i love to see. Keep it up!
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the encouraging words!
@RudisGlidingAdventures2 жыл бұрын
The Birdy project is really fascinating! I am following it since some years. Thank you Stefan for giving us an update, in particular for everybody like me who cannot join the Aero this year!
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
Would be cool to compare it with your Silent 2!
@thedave77602 жыл бұрын
@@SteFly So is this glider capable of taking off or just sustain power?
@jardiner472 жыл бұрын
This is a an exciting development in affordable environmentally-friendly recreational aviation! I look forward to more from you on this Stefan. You do great work.
@alexandervanwyk76692 жыл бұрын
Thanks Stefan. This was what I waited for. Minimalistic and simple. Only issue now is how much does it cost.
@arthurrobey71772 жыл бұрын
A step in the right direction. I'd still want thin-film solar cells covering the surface of the glider so that it can be used for touring in places that do not have conventional electrical power available.
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
Here at this glider it will be really difficult due to the strict weight limit at 120 kg... but of course it would be great!
@bevobus2 жыл бұрын
@@SteFly Why not deck out the trailer with the solar cells and possibly a batter bank instead?
@DLStarbuck2 жыл бұрын
Eric Raymond Solar-Flight
@sillyoldbastard32802 жыл бұрын
The weight would negate any benefit on an aircraft of this nature.
@Thorgon-Cross2 жыл бұрын
@@sillyoldbastard3280 NO. 1-2Kg is not going to harm how well you fly and still get you meaningful recharge where you could not without.
@etiennedekock9022 жыл бұрын
These are the most exciting and innovative design developments in a while. This glider might never win a race, but not all gliders should be compared to racing gliders. Compared to most other light aircraft or TMGs a 200 km vne is impressive. and 30 KW from a 4,7 kg motor!
@daszieher2 жыл бұрын
One cannot compare an electric motor to an internal combustion engine. One has to always include the fuel tanks and the batteries for a given mission.
@sillyoldbastard32802 жыл бұрын
Problem being the energy isn't in the motor... it's in the heavy batteries you need to power it. We won't surpass the energy density in petroleum products in our lifetime.
@daszieher2 жыл бұрын
@@sillyoldbastard3280 although the thought is quite seductive. Imagine an energy carrier with 10kWh/kg and a motor with almost 10kW/kg. Unfortunately any battery chemistry imaginable will not even come anywhere close to that. Maybe a fuel cell will one day, but not if it needs pure hydrogen.
@WoutervanTiel2 жыл бұрын
@@sillyoldbastard3280 well not mine but my 17 yr old very well might see that.
@sledawgpilot2 жыл бұрын
@@sillyoldbastard3280 Jet fuel is 50x more energy dense than a lithium batteries
@OnerousEthic2 жыл бұрын
I love the utility of the pusher prop in the tail, doubling and replacing the spoilers!
@jimpike74452 жыл бұрын
If I didn't already have my Silent 2 I'd certainly consider one. I like the convertible top. The 2hr endurance on electric would be great if true. The folding prop may windmill enough to stay open and provide adequate drag for approach. I expect the motor would have to supply significant braking/regen to stop the prop for folding. I doubt very much that it is reversible and even if it were , the lag in going from forward thru folded to reverse would make it impractical for glide-slope control.
@Paul-vh6ul2 жыл бұрын
It's a glider. So the motor is not running in the pattern. The flaps would probably be the primary way to increase the rate of descent. I'd not want to rely on the motor when landing.
@skybaton Жыл бұрын
Cool project but I don't like tail. It adds a lot of difficulties for take off and landing! Solution without spoilers is interesting but what if you don't have any power in the batteries? Glide performance is impressive!
@skyeparker58222 жыл бұрын
Yes please more electric gliders! I would like to know if they have plans to put solar panels on the wings?
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
I have not heard about it. Most probably the weight limit of 120 kg would not allow to install solar panels.
@gabrielrousseau_NM2 жыл бұрын
@@SteFly Seems if companies worked together the solar could be integrated into the wing structure without causing much weight difference. It's been done for RC for sure. There are already spy gliders with such capabilities I am sure.
@kornerederparamotor2 жыл бұрын
Danke für deine Berichterstattungen! So bekommen wir Zuhause auch Infos von der Messe. Weiter so. VG
@russellharris50722 жыл бұрын
Maybe you could get a test flight and record that for us,that would be very interesting especially the landing with reverse power............................
@danko65822 жыл бұрын
I would like to hear more about total cost of ownership, cost breakdown, takeoff distance.
@Glen.Danielsen2 жыл бұрын
Dankeschön, Stefan! Deutsch engineering at work again! Cheers to you from the States. 🇺🇸💛🇩🇪
@mystisith39842 жыл бұрын
Progress everywhere. I like their approach. The parachute to save both human and machine should be mandatory on all gliders according to me (I get that overall weight problem is a thing but priority to safety).
@F14DSUPERTOMCAT Жыл бұрын
Gliders are cheap. Even with a parachute, it’ll hit the ground at a vs high enough to break it badly. Might as well confirm pilot safety and not effect performance with a parachute. Avoid parachute requiring incidents in the first place really.
@kevinoregan73552 жыл бұрын
Great video Stefan. It is remarkable how far technology has come, to develop such a light electric motor glider. I would love to know, launch options, climb rate in nil wind etc. Thanks
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
I´ll need to test it on my own and see how it performs.
@Scubaseth1 Жыл бұрын
Yes! Enjoying your channel Stefan and would love to hear more about the Birdy EMG
@r.p.31922 жыл бұрын
Cooler Einblick ins Heckpropeller Konzept👍 Gerne mehr Infos Stefan🙏 Gruss von den Kanaren☀️🏖
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
Danke 🙂
@ericoschmitt2 жыл бұрын
There's one revolutionary ultralight type of glider you would really enjoy: hang gliders ;) from 19kg up to 45kg
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
Must be a lot of fun to fly aswell! I would love the freedome of hike and fly with a paraglider but with a hang glider you have also a lot of trouble to get in the air...
@ericoschmitt2 жыл бұрын
@@SteFly have a look at the VR sim for HG called The Free Flight Experience by Thomas Low, built on Unreal Engine with global map like MSFS. On the "trouble", it takes less time than sailplanes. You can hike with a Finsterwalder-Charly Airfex, breaks down to 1,85m. Single surfaces can setup in 10min plus 5 for harness and camera maybe. Paras may do it in 5-10 but they sit chatting waiting for thermals anyway, in the end we take off together, even topless gliders that may take 5mins extra. Comparing both... PG is good on ground, HG better in the air ;) PGs float, feels like flying on an inflatable couch, while HGs fly like a bird. If you were going to live in the sea, would you rather be a jellyfish or swordfish? Have I mentioned cheap? A new fex will cost you 4.5k eur and last 2-3+ decades of flying, then you swap the sail and keep gooing. PGs cost more long term!
@ericoschmitt2 жыл бұрын
@@SteFly just think about it, for the price of an "affordable" sailplane you can get 10 gliders, a van, and fly with a bunch of friends who can't afford it.
@jasonsanderson36122 жыл бұрын
Very interesting, performance sounds pretty good in terms of duration and climb rate….but how much is it going to cost???
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
Starting at about 60k €
@christiannnnnnnnnn2 жыл бұрын
@@SteFly holy cow
@DrJoel-is3uy2 жыл бұрын
I think that’s more affordable than some of the 600k ones I’ve seen
@Daniel-eg9wo2 жыл бұрын
@@christiannnnnnnnnn thats less than an ask21
@christiannnnnnnnnn2 жыл бұрын
@@Daniel-eg9wo I don't know much about glider prices, but I was surprised because I thought it is much.
@jeffreystorer49662 жыл бұрын
Finally an ev that not only is sensible but it really does fly well done
@Hawkeye9482 жыл бұрын
Interessantes Projekt. Für den Leistungsflug ist es zwar sicherlich nicht so geeignet, aber für den klassischen Renter mit genügend Kleingeld bietet es doch wesentlich mehr wie andere UL´s.
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
Richtigen Leistungsflug macht eh nur ein ganz kleiner Anteil der Segelflugpiloten. Unkompliziertes fliegen und der Spaß steht meistens im Vordergrund. Vermutlich kann man damit auch beachtliche Strecken fliegen, ähnlich wie jetzt mit der Clubklasse.
@michaeleisele_fly2 жыл бұрын
Danke Stefan für das Video. Den Birdy verfolge ich auch schon länger. Es ist ein total spannendes Konzept und ich denke der Segelflug wäre gut beraten, auch mal etwas mehr in die Richtung 120kg Klasse zu schauen. Fliegen ohne Medical, Eigenstarter und vermutlich völlig allein handlebar und das alles zu "normaleren Preisen" sind in meinen Augen sehr viele wichtige Argumente die sicher dem Zulauf des Segelflugs nicht schaden würden, wenn man sich nur die Zahl Lizenzinhaber Segelflug vs. UL anschaut, kann größer, teurer, usw. nicht das Ziel sein.
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
Danke Michael! Das sehe ich genauso.
@SteveReplin2 жыл бұрын
I would really like to know more about this glider. Can you provide more info about its price and availability? And, I would love to get you into the glider with your camera to get your opinion about how it handles in the air.
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
I don´t know the exact prices, I only heard something about 60k € for the shell with motor.
@carlosleon76832 жыл бұрын
@@SteFly that's actually quite a good deal considering that class 2 hang gliders (like the Archaeopteryx and the Swift E-lite2) sell for more than that
@alexanderfoelkel83162 жыл бұрын
And how about performance....I mean, at higher speeds, this will really suck. Nice it climbs like a Rhönlerche.... But it probably sinks like a brick in the glide at higher speeds....Just look at the huge fuselage....that is not the way to go
@glike22 жыл бұрын
This is tempting to buy! 🤩
@tadeksmutek58402 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Stefan - very interesting glider concept!
@viericzek2 жыл бұрын
Hi Stefan! Really inspirating material & video! I really appreciate your english skill! I've never seen this project. Birdy is for me absolutely new way of gliders design and just look into the future :) Thanks so much for this video! MW
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
Hi Marcin, thank you so much for the comment. I will try to make my 120 kg ultralight license soon, so I can testfly it.
@viericzek2 жыл бұрын
@@SteFly and moreover a lot of other gliders! Good luck! :)
@FlyingFun.2 жыл бұрын
I've used the prop as an air brake on my rc gliders for years and it works really well, all it needs is enough throttle to open the folding props and then the drag slows it all down. You said the props reverse on this, is that correct? What price would these be?
@ackerflieger67032 жыл бұрын
I´m pretty disappointed, because its not possible to get useful information from the manufacturer or the investors. Same information on the HP since 2 years, no actual prices nor delivery time. No technical details. I gave up. Thats not the way to promote a new electro sailplane. I either want to sell an airplane or I don't. It seems to me that they don't want .
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
There is no glider manufacturer out there who publishes the prices and delivery times on the homepage. If you really want to get these information you will get them. And of course it is a small team and their main focus is not marketing at the moment...
@ackerflieger67032 жыл бұрын
@@SteFly I tried to contact them via email and Phone. No reply. Finally I found an investor who told me, that the manufacturer is to busy to answer any questions. No comment.
@cabanford2 жыл бұрын
@@ackerflieger6703 maybe they're busy developing something cool right now and don't want to respond to grumpy emails?? 🤷
@ackerflieger67032 жыл бұрын
@@cabanford I'm a potential customer and not a grumpy email writer. With Schleicher or Schempp Hirth you get reasonable answers within 2 days. There is another german sailplane manufacturer who makes the same mistake, great products but wrong company policy. And the result?
@PeteZoot2 жыл бұрын
@@SteFly Hope you keep us all updated on this one! I too tried emailing my interest, but no reply. I'll keep hoping from over here in Canada. thx again for the Vid! cheers, Pete
@ronaldglider2 жыл бұрын
let's see more about this!
@chrisbraid29072 жыл бұрын
Scary when weight saving trumps secondary safety . Air braking when the prop fails might have to be a Ballistic Parachute , lighter and just as safe …
@fernmoss35392 жыл бұрын
Tell me more about this glider. How long to charge? Payload? Glide ratio? Comfort? Motor sound level in the cockpit? Automobile towing requirements.
@geraldhaller99062 жыл бұрын
In Segelflugzeugen macht ein E-Motor Sinn und eignet sich hervorragend um so die Reichweite zu erhöhen oder den rettenden Flugplatz zu erreichen und so lästige Außenlandungen zu vermeiden oder diese sicherer zu gestalten . Es braucht relativ wenig Leistung um ein Segelflugzeug in der Luft zu halten oder leichten Steigflug zu ermöglichen um zu starten braucht es schon etwas mehr an Leistung ist aber auch gut zu realisieren mit E-Motoren da diese auch kurzzeitig weit über ihrer eigentlichen Leistungsgrenze betrieben werden können und so relativ kleine Motoren zum Einsatz kommen können . Auch braucht es dafür keine extrem großen Akkus es würden einige wenige KWh völlig ausreichen um ein Segelflugzeug in die Luft zu bringen und dann noch zwei drei Steigflüge zu absolvieren ggf kann über Solarzellen noch etwas Energie nach getankt werden was aber sicher eher unwesentlich den Flug verlängern würde . Reine Motorflugzeuge auf Elektro zu bauen macht wenig Sinn da sehr viel Energie benötigt wird denn die oder der Motor muss dauerhaft laufen und relativ viel Power haben die auf Dauer abgegeben werden kann und so entsprechend größer sein muss und mehr Gewicht mit sich bringt selbiges bei den Akkus . Bei e-Autos geht man leider auch Irrwege und baut vorwiegend dicke schwere Autos mit E-Antrieb und damit die dann halbwegs ausreichende Reichweiten haben werden gigantische Akkus eingebaut teils mit 100kWh . Besser für die Umwelt wären kleine leichte Fahrzeuge mit denen man im Alltag zur Arbeit fährt welche mitten in der Stadt ist oder für andere Tägliche Kurzstrecken Fahrten . Möglichst wenig Energie verbrauch sollte da im Vordergrund stehen so das man mit kleinen Akkus möglichst ausreichende Reichweiten hat . Z.B. mit einem 30 kWh Akku um 250km reale Reichweite hat dieser dann an der 220v Steckdose über Nacht wieder vollgeladen werden kann .
@fernmoss35392 жыл бұрын
Aptera is exactly what you are suggesting.
@helmutpohl27622 жыл бұрын
Hi Gerald, ....gibt es doch schon längst ! ...einfach ´ mal selber informieren statt nur zu schwätzen .......
@geraldhaller99062 жыл бұрын
@@helmutpohl2762 Ach was dessen bin ich mir bewusst , schwätzer
@donbeuch19822 жыл бұрын
THAT IS A VERY INTERESTING GLIDER!! DOES IT CLASSIFY AS AN ULTRALIGHT IN THE US ? (NO PILOTS LICENSE OR MEDICAL REQUIREMENTS )? CAN YOU ARRANGE A FLIGHT AND DO A VIDEO I'D LOVE TO KNOW MORE!!THANKS GREATWORK!
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
Not sure about the US regulations. Here in the EU we need a 120 kg ultralight license but no medical. First I will need to get the license... costs some money but it's the plan
@WoutervanTiel2 жыл бұрын
120kg = 120 x 2.205 = 264.5 pounds. The part 103 ultra light weight limit is 254 pounds. However if equipped with airframe parachute the weight limit is lifted to 278 pounds. So if a chute can be added for less than 13.5 pounds it might be possible to be a part 103 vehicle. Note part 103 vehicles are not classified as airplanes. If over weight for part 103 then you will need a glider ppl, which is not the end of the world to obtain and good education. I think the most important piece of info is the cost, I might have missed it? What does it cost?
@robertweekley59262 жыл бұрын
He did answer the "About" price, in a reply I read, above! So, "About €60,000!"
@WoutervanTiel2 жыл бұрын
@@robertweekley5926 wow 60k would be great. Sign me up. Can the wings be removed/folded so it can be stored in a trailer? That is a big cost savings as in the USA T hangars are hard to find and increasingly expensive.
@haraldschallerl29732 жыл бұрын
Diese neuen Konzepte bringen meiner Meinung nach den Segelflug wieder zu seinem Ursprung. Federleicht und Spaß pur. Das größte Handicap ist wieder einmal die Bürokratie. Ich mit einem SPL mit Hilfsmotorstartberechtigung darf zwar bis zum Arcus alles fliegen aber nicht diesen kleinen Elektroflitzer. Ich habe einige Wochen die Silent 2 Electro (mit österreichischer Sonderzulassung) probieren dürfen. Hätte ich die finanziellen Mittel, wäre das für mich das ideale Spaßflugzeug. Ich habe auf meinem KZbinkanal schon 14 Follower. Vielleicht werde ich, wie du, noch zum erfolgreichen Blogger und die Hersteller reißen sich darum mir solche Fliegerlein zu Testzwecken zu überlassen;-))
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
Ist wirklich schade, dass man dafür erst einen neuen Fluschein machen muss. Vermutlich ist das aber nicht sonderlich schwer und auch die Kosten sollten sich in Grenzen halten.
@skyeparker58222 жыл бұрын
Would also love to hear from the Geiger guys about what applications they have envisioned for those larger motors.
@ricklederman2 жыл бұрын
No spoilers, counting on the electric system to always work, and always have enough power to create enough drag for a normal descent and landing. I don't think so. Great video anyway, thanks!
@louisvanrijn396411 ай бұрын
The early ASW12's had no speedbrakes. Once under a big strong cloud near the cloud base it is very nerve wracking not to be sucked into the clouds and stay VMC. Seen the claimed L/D of 40 the speed will rapidly approch the Vne in this situation. Nevertheless the complete concept is brilliant.
@darlingtonmachona2010 Жыл бұрын
Nice work Stefan, love the content
@fordstan55 Жыл бұрын
You call it affordable, but you don't say how much.
@archivist172 жыл бұрын
An innovative and interesting design.
@LoveBikesDorel7 ай бұрын
Sounds good , as an ex aerobatic glider pilot i don’t like the idea of no aerodynamic brakes , the engine reverse Is ok but once you end up with no battery loosing brakes doesn’t sound great., 😊
@benmcconnell60082 жыл бұрын
Yes, let's see you give it a flight.
@RudixSA2 жыл бұрын
Wow, fantastic! Would love one of those to fly from my home field.
@r0cketplumber2 жыл бұрын
I'd like to see an FMEA for using the electric drive as the speed brake, it requires the complex system to function vs the simple mechanical spoiler. The spoiler function, if not available, can be compensated for by flying uncoordinated at the cost of higher pilot workload, so it may be acceptable.
@vortex_un2 жыл бұрын
you can literally take it home with a friend. amazing.
@colinjacobs1762 жыл бұрын
Would love to see a test flight. The lack of airbrakes is interesting - if there's any problem with the motor, then you might get into difficulties with an outlanding.
@gregb15992 жыл бұрын
It's electric so extremely reliable
@julianday2 жыл бұрын
@@gregb1599 so are sat navs till they fail !
@uproid2 жыл бұрын
Any glider pilot knows how to sideslip, which is the alternative if your airbrakes don't work, so I'm not too concerned about that. I remember during my training in the 2 seater, on one approach I found the airbrake was completely jammed, and I had to sideslip it into a landing. I then discovered that the reason the brakes were jammed was because the instructor had his foot on the lever, just checking me out to see that I could cope without them.
@colinjacobs1762 жыл бұрын
@@uproid This is true although modern gliders like this are very slippery - I wonder what the sideslip does to the glide path, would it get the L/D below 10?
@BoomVang2 жыл бұрын
@@colinjacobs176 It's really a forward slip which is my favorite maneuver because it seems so naughty to cross control. I forget the steepness, but it certainly can make noise when airflow goes non-laminar. I always wondered what happens if you alternate the controls back and forth to play with the lag of laminar flow.
@filimonchik123tube2 жыл бұрын
I'm, probably, wrong but I use airbrakes to reduce lift, not speed. It is kind of scary to dive towards airfield with propeller basically working as a parachute. Sounds like acrobatic.
@brianb-p65862 ай бұрын
Air brakes increase drag, reducing speed for the same angle of attack. Spoilers reduce lift, and also increase drag. Gliders often have linked air brakes and spoilers, so they are used together. Either has the effect of making the glide slope steeper, but they affect pitch differently.
@DanFrederiksen2 жыл бұрын
very nice to have low weight including motor, I'm a big believer that planes can be a lot better than they are, mainly powered planes where they can get away with poor engineering. I would like to see a similar optimized plane with a pressurized cabin and 2 tiny turbofan jet engines on it for a design speed well over 500km/h. I think that concept has enormous potential. People fail to appreciate that a turbofan plane can be very fuel efficient at altitude and have extreme range so we can have fast, cheap, fuel efficient, long range planes with dual engine redundancy for ocean crossing capability. It would be a small revolution.
@helmutpohl27622 жыл бұрын
Hi Dan, - so You need only 12 hours to fly from Frankfurt to New York - alone in Your plane ...........and so cheap ...... ha ha ha
@DanFrederiksen2 жыл бұрын
@@helmutpohl2762 It could be a tandem or 4 seater, same premise. And it could be 9-10 hours to New York which is pretty fast from decision time, likely beating an airliner and it becomes extremely fast when it's not a common destination like New York. Say Nova Scotia, Kentucky or Manitoba, well outside any major city. It might be 4 times faster than commercial airliner. And similarly inside Europe. Say Fyresdal Norway to Mors Denmark, a trip that takes quite a long time and cannot be done by commercial air but in a personal plane could be done in 30 minutes for next to no money while it might cost 400$ by cars and planes and trains and take 18 hours. Rich people pay big money for less freedom. Or Paderborn, Germany to Norwich, England, that's 45 minutes but try doing that with public transport. I just did a search on travellink, 4 flights each way, 800$, 10½ hours one way and you depart at 7AM and 19hours the other way. With a personal jet you just go whenever you want and it's close to cost free. With runway to runway autopilot you don't even have to fly it. Private jet freedom but no more expensive than a car. If done right.
@brucemiller81092 жыл бұрын
First...Ill keep spoilers please, second Price?, third Pilot weight?.. im 240lbs and 6-4 and fit well in the old 2-32.
@berndhachmeister43572 жыл бұрын
Great video. 120KG ready to fly with battery pack?
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
I think it's without the battery packs
@PureGlide2 жыл бұрын
It's interesting, but hard to comprehend who the target market is? Non competitive local pilots who want an electric launch? Not sure I like the idea of needing power to get down, but as you say not having air brakes would save a huge amount of weight, control rods, and time to build.
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
I´m in contact with two customers who previously flew paragliders/ hanggliders. Having the possibility to self-launch + a reasonable range with electric power is great. For most pilots it´s not important to fly 1000 km, it´s more about beeing in the air and enjoying the flight. Here in Germany we also have bigger advantages for 120 kg microlight planes: No medical, no yearly checks by an inspector, .... And at the end the performance is not worse than a club class glider. I could imagine to buy one one day.
@halsmith50342 жыл бұрын
This is interesting niche for UL-rated machines in the United States (FAA FAR103). The e-Birdy would not quite make that specification (115kg empty and maximum 45km unpowered stall) but is very close. The ATOS Wing also seen in the video does qualify I think, as does the developing Aeriane Swift 3.
@cabanford2 жыл бұрын
@@SteFly as a comp paragliding pilot, I was about to say the same thing. The gap between high end sailplanes and paragliders keeps getting smaller 😎😎😎
@lesizmor90792 жыл бұрын
@@halsmith5034 With an airframe recovery parachute, as this has provision for, the weight limit goes up. The BRS Soft-Pack should do it.
@FreedZ Жыл бұрын
Schönes Video über ein gutes Flugzeugkonzept. Was ist die Gleitzahl vom Birdy?
@surplusstock8778 Жыл бұрын
How much weight would a parachute add for the glider?Seems like it should be mandatory. Would give great peace of mind.
@rodericde8762 жыл бұрын
“A great option for hot summer days” I don’t think so. It is for improved access to the cockpit for exhibition purposes.
@hinz12 жыл бұрын
Or to jump out more easily, if it folds up in midair....
@jahroams2 жыл бұрын
Yes please wow, also if they would produce a side by side 2 seater would be something super special
@Taoweiji2 жыл бұрын
@Stefan Langer: I'm a new viewer and subscriber after just finding your channel. As an airline pilot by profession, I also fly helicopters, gyroplanes, paragliders, and other aircraft. This section of aviation is intriguing me more and more. Could you do a video, or series of videos about how to start gliding, what aircraft are good beginner gliders to purchase, weather conditions to be aware of for beginners, danger signs, how to switch your mindset from powered high-performance aircraft to gliders, and subjects of that nature? 😎👍
@lucywucyyy2 жыл бұрын
i love it! id love something like this but i think it should have spoilerons, surely that wouldnt add much weight
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
It´s available with spoilers aswell.
@lucywucyyy2 жыл бұрын
@@SteFly nice!
@paulslevinsky5802 жыл бұрын
You should explain that the glider needs only a few kW of power to maintain level flight at about 1.3 x stall.
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
Around 3 kW for level flight, that´s insane!
@sailplaneencyclopedia2 жыл бұрын
Definitely interested in knowing more about the Birdy ultralight glider., thanks
@Pleksilasi11 ай бұрын
how much does the motor + batteries weight? a twostroke + few liters of gas is smaller, lighter and has better mpg
@krzysztofpel20782 жыл бұрын
Yessss! Sorry 😅 I obviously meant that addicional infotmantion will be great to hear
@donzioldbuddy2 жыл бұрын
Show us the ATOS air glider please !!!
@naseefaamindato4670 Жыл бұрын
thank you stefan i enjoy it
@johnnycomelately63412 жыл бұрын
I am interested to see more about the Birdy
@jonshereshaw31982 жыл бұрын
Tell me more with the glider assembled. Price? What license do I need to fly it?
@TheShahrokh9 Жыл бұрын
What are the specs! The surface area ! The aspect ratio,! Stall speed! 103 legal requirements are to have it with less than 24 kn stall speed and that will dictate what will be the surface area size and total wing load..
@DealorG2 жыл бұрын
Does anyone by any chance know for what price these are going to sell new ?
@clean7132 жыл бұрын
Very good video!
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@neal-stewart8342 жыл бұрын
it would be nice to here more details Thanks
@krusty1974 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely very interested.. would be nice to see you test flying it.
@wild2flyparagliding1602 жыл бұрын
I don't understand how they will use braking with prop to degrade your glide for landing. The folding prop opens with forward thrust. How would you achieve that to create revers or just drag? What am I missing here?
@brunovinyl2 жыл бұрын
centrifugal forces on the prop make it stays open
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
You are right. It can´t be reverse power - only drag from the unfolded prop. A mechanism to controle the pitch of the prop would be awesome.
@erikisberg38862 жыл бұрын
A wind milling prop could create a lot of drag, autorotate down gyrocopter style, sort of... I assume pitch can be adjusted otherwise there would not be much drag.
@julesviolin2 жыл бұрын
Not sure about that huge shaft sticking out the rear. Looks crazy even without the prop.
@mikaelfransson36582 жыл бұрын
increase the weight with suncellpanels on the wings and a front propeller its 5 kilos more and make the concept ten times better!
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
Why should be a front propeller be any better?
@zooknz17112 жыл бұрын
This is cool glider - please do show some more.
@csshep Жыл бұрын
Would be great to see more about this glider...
@ronalddelo87532 жыл бұрын
Yes, let’s see it fly😎
@knowledgebyte2 жыл бұрын
Wow. Brilliant. More please!
@knowledgebyte2 жыл бұрын
Slide slip is easy enough to master. I’ve used it to align a light aircraft back onto the runway heading after a strong late crosswind pushed me way off track. All glider pilots are taught it I thought as part of their landing procedures. I certainly was, way back in 1976 when I first got my glider pilots license.
@jasonsanderson36122 жыл бұрын
@@knowledgebyte yes, side slipping is taught to glider pilots - as it may be crucial to getting into a small field when “landing out”
@kellywilkins69342 жыл бұрын
Definitely want to know more!
@denisconrad85342 жыл бұрын
Is the Birdy going to be my return to Ultralight and Glider ? You tell em Stefan (thanks for the shared video) Friedrichshafen defenitely is an interestign spot
@Nicolasfcl2 жыл бұрын
Sure i'm interested such a glider ! Could you try it ? How. many € it cost ? Where is it build ?
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
I will try it!
@walterporges67382 жыл бұрын
Wieviel Höhenmeter können mit einer vollen Batterie erzielt werden? Gibt es PV-Paneele?
@pedtrog64432 жыл бұрын
Yep, would love to see it flying. Another question... is there no horizontal stabilizer?
@DavidOfWhitehills2 жыл бұрын
I guess it goes on the top of the tailfin.
@brianb-p65862 ай бұрын
The horizontal stabilizer does go on top of the tail; it is not mounted a the time of the video (and there are other missing hatches and unfinished details).
@drabsinwa1802 жыл бұрын
Thanks Stefan, really interesting... I would like to see how much the kit will sell for?
@seamuscashin26062 жыл бұрын
what useful load can it carry ie pilot weight the long shaft would have loss of power
@iluminumfalcon86192 жыл бұрын
The handle moved by itself is it wireless control???
@NoTengoIlusiones2 жыл бұрын
Getting near a Hang Glider ATOS 😀
@G117132 жыл бұрын
Why build a mere flight extender when you can build a self launcher?
@stijnvandamme76 Жыл бұрын
open cockpit : how much extra drag?
@stijnvandamme76 Жыл бұрын
does the prop as brake.. also regen the battery?
@ImtiazAhmad-lt3kg Жыл бұрын
It's amazing work
@denisconrad85349 ай бұрын
Yes will like to see more about it please
@Farweasel2 жыл бұрын
Are we interested in learning more? Is the Bear Catholic Stefan? You mention its ultralight rating ......... Ultralights can take off under their own power. I didn't suppose the Birdy could do that - It looks like the prop would hit the ground?
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
The Birdy is able to self launch!
@Farweasel2 жыл бұрын
@@SteFly This just gets better & more tempting with each piece of further information.
@erikisberg38862 жыл бұрын
I am a noob on these microlight gliders...Perhaps a stupid question, but can You fly these on an EASA glider licence? Or do You require a country specific micro light licence?
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
You need a micro light licence because it has a propulsion system. A micro light glider without propulsion would only need a check flight...
@erikisberg38862 жыл бұрын
@@SteFly Thanks for the clarification, makes sense! I thought that perhaps it was under the same rules as SLG:s.
@robertjackson14072 жыл бұрын
Thank you 😊
@markspc12 жыл бұрын
Nice looking glider. Electric motors for airplane is a mute point: it looks simple but it is not. You need a heavy inefficient battery (very polluting) an DC/AC converter, an expensive permanent magnet (from China) motor and the dreadful limited range. For the same weight and less money you can get a gasoline (petrol) engine that can go 10 times longer.
@wuseling2 жыл бұрын
Whats the max pilots weight ? (Finally I found it on the Website: max take-off weight: 280 kg)
@SteFly2 жыл бұрын
I think it is 300 kg
@toadamine8 ай бұрын
2:06 someones carbon fiber Top Hat on the wing? lol
@tobiasribisch7122 жыл бұрын
how much does it cost?
@danko65822 жыл бұрын
Ooh, weight saving translates into short wingspan, that'll save on hangar rental.