Steinhart Ocean One 39 Green Ceramic (Starbucks Homage) 4K Watch Review

#ChampagneWatchForLemonadeMoney
Steinhart Ocean One 39 Green Ceramic (Starbucks Homage) 4K Watch Review #WR4K

[@watchreviews4k]

Steinhart Ocean One 39 Green Ceramic: www.steinhartwatches.de/en/diver-watch/diver-watch-39mm/ocean-39-green-ceramic.html

[@gregentwistle5105]

My son & I have probably 10 Steinhart watches. Outstanding quality and styles. Great vid showcasing the Ocean 39.

[@marcusn132]

I own 2 Rolex, An omega and some other high price watches. Bought the steinhart 39 green ceramic and was completely surprised how good the watch is made and feels. I don’t want to wait 10 years on the list for a green submariner, this Steinhart is a perfect alternative 👍 The only thing I think it would upgrade the watch is a glossy black dial..

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Marcus. Congratulations. Excellent choice. Wear yours in good health. Agreed, a black glossy enamel dial would enhance the piece. Regards, #WR4K

[@seayak]

@@watchreviews4k I agree about the glossy black dial

[@Fentongrenville]

It's so nice to listen to a watch guy who knows his subject. Brilliant review, I completely concur with you. I own 5 Steinharts and about to pull the trigger on an Ocean 39 Metropole.

[@chrisp.5272]

This and the Casio Oceanus S100. Getting them both by the end of the year.

[@cletusberkeley9441]

Beautiful, absolutely beautiful! I already own the Ocean One 39 Black and the Ocean One GMT Pepsi, which are going very well about four years now.

[@fondoman3884]

.. it's beautiful. Bezel has the right shade of green. Watch is of the right size too, which is 39mm. Beautiful finishing of the strap; liked the case back cover. Good loom, good bezel alignment. I don't mind the 1.5x cyclop. A really nice watch. Thank you.

[@abesanchez3642]

Great review. I currently own 4 Steinharts and couldn’t be happier. The quality of watch you get is outstanding

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Abe. Glad you enjoyed it. Congratulations. Wear your pieces in good health Regards.

[@thetintopirate6861]

This watch is better than watches 5 times the price , Once you have one in your hand you will want more Steinhart watches! I Did!!

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Colin. Agreed, the Ocean One is excellent quality/value at the respective price point. Wear yours in good health. Regards.

[@ricardoedwardo5799]

Yip just about to buy this one too, best quality watches by far for the price

[@watchreviews4k]

@@ricardoedwardo5799 Thank you for watching Ricardo. Congratulations. Excellent choice. Wear yours in good health. Regards.

[@jazzman5598]

Totally agree. I am looking for my NEXT Steinhart already!

[@ThiHaGadgets]

How much does it weigh?

[@BryanPike]

I have a 42mm version on a 8 1/2" wrist which is pretty perfect. If you like a watch with some heft... this has it in spades. Really a superb value.

[@barrypanaretou9124]

Best review out there so far. I've just purchased the double green premium and waiting for it to arrive!

[@watchreviews4k]

Congratulations. Excellent choice. Wear yours in good health. Regards, #WR4K

[@rogerauclair1670]

Very nice watch and a very professional, informative review.

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Roger. Glad you enjoyed it. Wear your pieces in good health. Regards.

[@QuackLoud]

One of the best video reviews of the Steinhart Ocean One. Thank you.

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Paul. Glad you enjoyed it. Regards, #WR4K

[@iltc9734]

That was a very fair minded, detailed, interesting, and superbly done review. Thank you. I think this watch is now on my list.

[@deangundlach7164]

Most detailed review I think I’ve ever seen. Great Job.

[@canadianwatchmonkey3992]

I have the premium double green and wish I went with Starbucks, The green used on the dial is just to bling bling for my liking.

[@colemanhoyt5437]

Thanks for telling me about this. I had an itch for a classy looking dive watch. I'm getting an affordable one with outstanding quality thanks to you!

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Coleman. Congratulations. Excellent choice. Wear yours in good health. Regards, #WR4K

[@colemanhoyt5437]

​@@watchreviews4k I've been wearing it for about a week. It's a fantastic watch, one of the best I've ever owned. I had a couple concerns. The first is that it just looks like I'm wearing a fake Rolex. But then I realized there are a tiny number of people on the planet who know and care about that, and they don't matter. The other concern is that I'm getting a watch that will not hold its value. I still think that's true, but for $485 it's not a huge deal and with a design this timeless and versatile, I'm not likely to want to get rid of it anytime soon anyway. In spite of those concerns, it is a superb quality and value, and I don't think I went wrong.

[@seayak]

I was so impressed by this watch and your objective and enthusiastic review that I ordered one directly from Steinhart. Can't wait till it shows up!

[@DoctorF1984]

Have fun with her. Great watches. I have the kermit with green aluminum bezel. I love the watch and her accuracy.

[@seayak]

@@DoctorF1984 I am very happy with my Ocean 39 green ceramic - I prefer the ceramic over the aluminum for both durability and colour - I think they nailed the colour with this one. I was so delighted with this watch that I ordered one of the new Classic GMT Ceramics in 42 mm, and it arrived just yesterday. This one is fully up to expectations too, in materials, workmanship, appearance and function. I can wear the 42 mm with my 7 1/4 inch wrist, but like both sizes for daily wear. The bevel on the 39 mm was stiff when delivered, as others have noted, but is loosening up with use. The crown action and winding are also a bit stiff compared with the 42 mm. Overall I prefer he action and feel of the 42 mm, but can recommend either watch to potential buyers.

[@theaveragejuan]

I've got the ocean one 39 black and still rockin it. i've got my eyes on this one too. love the color of the bezel.

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. Congratulations, the black 39 is an excellent piece. Wear yours in good health. Regards.

[@zxh5566]

I rather buy the seagull ocean star, bought one 1month ago for $150, with a ST2330 chip which is similar to eta2824. So far it’s amazing! And the price is once in a million years so don’t expect to get it all time.

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. Regards.

[@gregentwistle5105]

Champagne watch for Lemonade money…. Outstanding review sir!

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Greg. Glad you enjoyed it. Regards, #WR4K

[@paulvon2378]

Great watch. $600 USD. Have it in 1 week.

[@Delveinformation1]

I am eagerly waiting for mine to arrive and is due to your outstanding reviews that this will now be my third Steinhart watch. They are quite simply unbeatable. Thank you for your fine work. Why did you not go into the crown action and threading on this watch as you normally do? Would you comment on the crown action?

[@watchreviews4k]

Congratulations Jonas. Excellent choice. Wear yours in good health. Apologies, I forgot to discuss the crown action. It is silky smooth, excellent interface between the crown thread and crown tube thread. Regards, #WR4K

[@MF-hq9mq]

Great review, John. Enjoyed it as always. I think this piece is one of Steinhart’s best efforts as a great all-rounder. That ceramic bezel is to die for! Thanks for sharing. Best Regards

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Mario. Glad you enjoyed it. Agreed it's one of Steinhart's best watches in their current collection. Regards.

[@TaylorCFP]

Had my ocean 39 for a few years. Really nice piece and makes me no longer lust after a Sub, especially with the long waitlists and inflated prices in the grey market. However, man does my watch run slow. -30 secs a day! Didn’t start that way initially, but after a few years really doesn’t keep good time. Was not expecting I’d have to take it in for service so soon.

[@watchreviews4k]

Sorry to hear that Taylo. Regards, #WR4K

[@seayak]

You could try demagnetizing it, but there is nothing wrong with the idea of having it serviced.

[@jazzman5598]

Fine vid on really fine watches. I have the “Pepsi” Ocean 39 Vintage GMT with an ETA 2893-2 movement. It is probably their most expensive GMT but it is superb in quality, design, and function. I have seen GMTs rocking the exact same ETA and charging two.....two &1/2 the Money$$$$ !

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. Glad you enjoyed it. Congratulations. Excellent piece, and excellent movement. Agreed, the ETA 2893-2 is often used in much more expensive pieces; so it is outstanding value in the 39 GMT. Wear yours in good health. Regards.

[@jazzman5598]

Thanks!

[@kennethswift9211]

i really enjoyed the comprehensive review of this watch thank you

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Kenneth. Glad you enjoyed it. Regards.

[@randyreynolds1045]

Best watch I own❤

[@dstjoe]

Great review except, please turn the bezel around to demonstrate the bezel action. I’ve owned an ocean one and one of my dislike is the bezel being very difficult to turn. This would have been a perfect review if we could see how the bezel action have improved from previously. Thanks

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. Usually I test the bezel action in my reviews, on this occasion I forgot to. Regards.

[@hiramabiff885]

Now you've done it! I was ready to pull the trigger on the San Martin and I think this Steinhart is a better choice. GRRRRRR!

[@Delveinformation1]

I own both and there is a lack of "Panache"with the San Martin, but as the reviewer said, the joke is on Rolex because they actually did an homage of Steihart with the green bezel. That is absolutely fantastic for those of us who don't spend stupid money on Rolexes. STUPID MONEY.

[@coolspiritministries]

I subscribed because of your professional and pleasing review. Well done!

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Lee. Glad you enjoyed it. Regards.

[@Visitor555]

Best review on this model. Ive asked you which one u will prefer this or with aluminium but i decided man. I like more darker grey/black dial and ceramic looks much more premium. Ill buy it soon :)

[@watchreviews4k]

Difficult decision as both the Kermit and Cermit 39 versions are excellent. Personally I prefer the ceramic bezel, and darker black dial. Steinhart did a really good job on the engraved numerals with white paint. I prefer the bezel to the Cerachrom one on my Rolex Submariner Date. The numerals are infilled with platinum which gives them a matte silver look. The white paint used on the Ocean One ceramic bezel looks better. I also prefer the lumed triangle to the lumed bezel pip Rolex use. Overall it is an excellent quality/value watch for 455 Euro including Fedex shipping. The only negative is the 1.5x magnification of the cyclops rather than 2.5x Rolex use. But that is a minor negative one can live with. Wear yours in good health. Regards.

[@Visitor555]

@@watchreviews4k ive got full black Steinhart ceramic ocean one 39 at the end :) i play safe and im very happy with my purchase. Cheers!

[@watchreviews4k]

@@Visitor555 Congratulations. Excellent choice. The black 39 ceramic is one of the bets watches Steinhart have ever made. Excellent quality/value for the respective price point. The truth is I prefer the 39's bezel to the one on my Submariner Date. The white paint, and lumed triangle look better. I also prefer the heavier bezel action with louder clicks. Wear yours in good health. Regards.

[@Visitor555]

@@watchreviews4k Thank you, ive heard you said that in your video also on other comment reply and that give me courage to buy the Steinhart because i not have money for Submariner and that is the best design for diver watch for me and many others, so i feel proud now with my Steinhart, thank you for your honesty and not snobbery :) i apreciate honest people who help with real advices and not watching only the brand name, because many people dont care for comparing watches for what we get for price/quallity and when someone have money to buy luxury watch they think this is the best and nothing else can compare to it. Sure its better but if we compare them for price/quallity who wins? As i can see for you also like myself Steinhart wins in that comparison. Cheers man!

[@watchreviews4k]

@@Visitor555 I agree with you. There is a lot of snobbery in watch collecting. Rolex fanboys will look down on collectors with anything less; such as a Steinhart Ocean One 39, or Pagani Design PD-1661. As you can see from my reviews, and State Of The Collection video; I am not like that. The Ocean One 39 is the best watch for under 500 Euro. The PD-1661 is the best watch for under 100 Euro. I appreciate many collectors cannot afford to pay 11K Euro for a Submariner Date on the grey market. So the Ocean One 39, and PD-1661; are good alternatives for a collector that can afford 500 Euro or 100 Euro pieces. The most important thing is the feel good factor of wearing the piece. The truth is, the Ocean One 39 gives the same feel good factor as a Submariner Date; but without the expense; or waiting list nonsense at a Rolex AD. The Submariner Date is a good watch; but so is the Ocean One 39. That is the truth. Of course the Rolex fanboy will never admit that; as it hurts his ego to do so. You see my 3 piece collection? I also have a 68 Euro Vostok Amphibia, and 62 Euro Pagani Design PD-1661. I enjoy the feel good factor of these low-tier pieces as much as my Submariner Date. I don't look down on any collector for owning these pieces, I admire their confidence. They are wearing the watches because they like them, not to impress other collectors they can afford a heavy hitter. Congratulations on buying a great watch. Wear it in good health. Regards.

[@user-gf3tw4tm3n]

Brillante explicación muy abarcadora, mis mas sinceros respetos para usted

[@johnwick860]

thank you for explaining the "elabor" part in the specs

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching John. Glad you enjoyed it. Regards, #WR4K

[@mediastarguest]

Excellent review. For my next purchase (200m diver's) I've narrowed it down to three watches: I'm in two minds about this Steinhart 39mm, a Seiko 777 and the new Citizen Diver "Fugu." Seiko is a bit big at 44 mm, though. All supposedly sub-500 euros. I ruled out the new Tissot Seastar because I think its overly bulky hands are ugly and spoil the face. Also ruled out the classy new(ish) Raymond Weil Freelancer on grounds of cost (well over a grand). Got to say that bracelet and clasp on the Steinhart look amazing quality.

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. Glad you enjoyed it. Interesting choices. I think the Ocean One 39 is the best option. Steinhart have a 14 day return policy; so as long as you leave the plastic on when trying it, you can return it for full refund if not satisfied. This is something the other brands don't offer. Regards.

[@DavidV4444]

Fantastic overview, thank you!

[@robertuskoppies444]

Lovely review. Excellent. I will order one from Manuela....uh....Günther...., as it's (in my humble opinion) the best SUB homage. Keep up the good work!

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Robertus. Glad you enjoyed it. Wear yours in good health. Regards.

[@scrhunter3901]

The best review! The most forgot the lumeshot!!! For me the lume is very intresting😉👍🏻

[@alfredoscigliano6229]

Great watch (I buy it today..) and great and honest review. Quality and price at the top.

[@Leosten99]

Great review, its amazing to see so much value at this price point considering the price of other luxury watches. I'd rather buy one Steinhart and save the 7k from a Rolex.

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. Glad you enjoyed it. Regards, #WR4K

[@cuccumagic]

I bought one on Sunday and i can't wait, thanks for the lovely review

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. Glad you enjoyed it. Congratulations. Excellent choice. Wear yours in good health. Regards.

[@deannoble673]

New to your channel and really enjoyed your comprehensive review of this watch. I have the OVM 39 and totally agree that those proportions are the absolute sweet spot for a wristwatch. Have looked at this one a few times and I think your review may have tipped the balance. Excellent presentation and keep up the good work.

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Dean. Glad you enjoyed it. Excellent choice. Wear yours in good health. Regards.

[@indyawichofficial1346]

Same here - 39mm case variant is most elegant, and most balanced proportionally in my opinion, while 42/44 mm version seem somehow bit different, not only bigger. The 39mm also, if not mistaken, does not suffer with straight long lugs as bigger cases. Wears really flat - but must admit have I flat wrist too. Additionally the Oceans supplied with upgraded type of ceramic engraved bezel insert deliver kind of a class step up, having absolutely awesome look! Plus minus 2-3 sec/day here. Perplexed !!!!

[@watchreviews4k]

@@indyawichofficial1346 Thank you for watching. Glad you enjoyed it. Regards.

[@orwellknew9112]

I don’t care about the cyclops being 1.5 times. Seems a very personal complaint considering there are many who don’t want a cyclops at all and others who prefer to go even further with just leaving the date out altogether. The main thing is that this watch is gorgeous and it has a very similar look to the Rolex. The proportions of the bezel to the case and the hour marking loom and the hands are very harmonious, just like the Rolex. Steinhart have really got the bezel nailed. I think it is more attractive than the Rolex. I think, if I had a wish, it would for the lugs to have a bit more downward curve to help the watch to sit on smaller wrists securely. Yes, the clasp could be better if is had a ratcheting fine adjustment, but that seems to be a common place for improvements for all watches at this price. The lugs could also be drilled for easier removal of the strap. Those improvements wouldn’t change the cost very much at all, but I think they would be very much appreciated by the market. Steinhart has got so much nailed already, that with just a few small changes it would be very hard to suggest any more improvements. I love the green they’ve used for the bezel. My mind is almost made up. I’m definitely getting one. My only decision is do I go Kermit or will it be Hulk?

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. Regards, #WR4K

[@sensible202]

2 holes in the side of the case would totally destroy the look of any watch.

[@watchreviews4k]

@@sensible202 Thank you for watching. Regards, #WR4K

[@seayak]

On the bright side, the 1.5 X cyclops does not stand so proud of the case as compared to a 2.5, so I would expect it is less likely to catch on anything and get damaged.

[@ngwaicham]

Very detailed descriptions and objective comments on this Starbucks. 👍👍👍

[@mickeydee3595]

awesome watches. Manuela also packaged mine 😅 Got the same 39, bought the jubilee and rubber bracelet for it aswell

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. Congratulations. Excellent choice. Wear yours in good health. Regards.

[@ricdaij]

Excellent review, and it inspires me to make my purchase of the ocean one Steinhart blue. I have a Ocean 2 premium white, which is a Steinhart original. After seeing your review I’ve settled on the ocean one as mentioned above. Thanks for your insightfulness, and I also subscribed to your channel. Look forward to following you in the future. Be well.

[@watchreviews4k]

Congratulations. Excellent choice. Wear yours in good health. Also check out my Ocean 39 Marine Black review below, it may interest you. Regards, #WR4K kzbin.info/www/bejne/q3bbg416qqadqcU

[@toni_hitman]

Great Review! A very beautiful Watch! I'm a bit ambivalent about Homage watches, I understand the pros and cons 100% and I also have Hommage watches in mind. I have to say that my Ocean 39 GMT Black Ceramic does not have this feeling, unlike this watch. It is probably simply because steel and black are so ubiquitous and you don't associate them directly with Rolex like a Kermit, Hulk or Pepsi, I don't know. At least I think so. But everyone should wear what he feels comfortable with!

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. Homage watch brands like Steinhart often draw criticism for copying Rolex. However I don't see it as any different from Jack Heuer copying the Submariner Date with the Heuer Professional Diver (844 Monnin case) during the Quartz Crisis of the 1970's. It didn't just save the Heuer brand from going bust, it became a great success for the brand as a less expensive alternative to the Submariner Date. So really Günter Steinhart is just doing the same in the 2000's as Jack Heuer did in the 1970's; producing a less expensive alternative to the Submariner Date. I only own one watch; a 116610LN Submariner Date, but I have owned several Ocean One's previously; and they give a similar feel good factor. The main advantage being one doesn't have any of the Rolex AD waiting list nonsense to go through. One can simply buy direct online and the watch is delivered by Fedex 5 days later. I think Rolex SA Geneva should consider adopting the same business model; and retail the watches direct online shipping via Fedex globally. They have already moved in the direction by leaving Baselworld and launching their novelties online. An Ocean One is a great first Swiss automatic for a collector; or simply a less expensive alternative to Tudor, Omega, and Rolex. The other positive of an Ocean One is the value retention; compared to other brands such as Omega which depreciate heavily from retail. So I consider Steinhart to be the modern-day mid-tier Heuer brand replacement; a good piece for a collector to experience whilst saving up for a Black Bay, Seamaster, or Submariner Date. Wear yours in good health. Regards.

[@toni_hitman]

@@watchreviews4k Thanks for the Jack Heuer thing, very interesting! I see it the same way you do, Steinhart offers watches with a good price-performance ratio - not everybody can and wants to afford a Rolex and if you like the design of a Rolex, Steinhart is a good alternative. I also have to say that I don't like many Diver watches, Rolex did everything right with the design of the Submariner and Steinhart does everything right 😄👍 Personally, I'm saving up for a Rolex Submariner Date (Black) and I'm going to treat myself to one. I really like the Kermit, Hulk and Pepsi watches and I could imagine buying them from Steinhart after I bought the Rolex. These discussions about Homage watches are unnecessary, everyone should wear what he wants. I like my Ocean GMT and enjoy 👍 a good companion to the dream watch Rolex.

[@watchreviews4k]

@@toni_hitman Check out my Submariner Date review, it may interest you. The GMT is an excellent choice. Wear yours in good health. Regards.

[@1SaG]

Couldn't agree more re size. Had the OVM and this Ceramic Green both in 42mm. Sold them both and replaced them with their 39mm versions. I also picked up two more 39mm O1s along the way (Marine Blue and Vintage GMT Pepsi) and all of them are high quality products. However: The bezel-action on all four of them was too stiff out of the box. Slightly too stiff on the GMT and the Green, and significantly too stiff on the other two. And judging from other YTs' experiences, this seems to be the norm with a lot of 39mm O1s (my two 42mm O1s were smooth as silk right out of the box). Simply rotating the bezels 2 to 4 times once a day has resolved that "problem" on all of them over time, but I think it's worth mentioning to potential buyers who aren't familiar with these watches. Another "drawback" (in quotation marks since it doesn't bother me, but might bother others) is the fact that, IMO, the hands on the 39mm O1s are a little to large for their dials. It's very noticeable on the OVM, where the seconds-hand nearly runs into the steel rehaut - when on the 42 (and on the genuine MilSub) it barely touches the minute markings. Again: Doesn't bother me and will probably never be noticed by 99.9% of people unless they have a 42 and 39 in front of them at the same time.

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. I previously owned 42 versions as I thought they would fit my 8" wrist better. I later realised the 39 case is a better fit. With regards to the hands being too large; I believe it is deliberate by Steinhart as the Mercedes hands are still under patent by Rolex SA Geneva; so making them larger avoids any legal claims for infringement. Regards.

[@1SaG]

@@watchreviews4k OVM has sword-hands, Marine Blue has snowflakes. IMO it's probably a cost issue. I can't be 100% certain, but I'd say they generally use the same size of hands on both the 42 and 39. The Mercedes-hands are a bit on the larger side, too for the 39's dial-size, but it's barely noticeable since the seconds-hand on the Mercedes-set is a lot thinner than that arrowhead-one on the OVM. Same with the Merc-minute hand which is a lot less stubby and much "pointier" than its counterparts in both the snowflake- and the sword-set. Oh well ...very minor complaint, anyway.. :D

[@watchreviews4k]

@@1SaG I have previously owned several 39's and 42''s; including the Vintage Military. The Mercedes hands on the 39 and 42 are different sizes. In both cases they are larger than Rolex Submariner hands. This is deliberate by Steinhart to avoid breaching the Intellectual Property Rights of Rolex SA Geneva. With regards to the production cost of the 5517 Milsub style sword hands, and Tudor Snowflake hands, they use similar amounts of Superluminova; therefore the production cost is similar. I prefer the sword hands and would like to see Steinhart use them on all Ocean One models. Regards.

[@markbrogan2431]

Super review as always. Perfect dimensions for my 7.15" wrist. Just need to decide on the green or black ceramic option. Thanks.

[@watchreviews4k]

Congratulations Mark. Excellent choice. Wear yours in good health. Regards, #WR4K

[@markbrogan2431]

I have gone for the black ceramic and could not be happier, after almost 1 week, watch is running +3 secs per day. Lovely piece.

[@playboypaul1]

Loved this review I'm going to try grab one for the new year for sure

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Paul. Glad you enjoyed it it. Excellent choice. Wear yours in good health. Regards.

[@bruh_oly1370]

Hi John , I'm all ordered now and can't wait to receive this watch from Steinhart. All thanks to your review and the other video with just the music. I looks a fantastic watch and I'm hoping the expectation exceeds the reality once it's here. I was happy with the quality of the vintage reds but agree with you the size dimensions on them are a little large and I'm about a 7" wrist. What I'm gleaning from your other Rolex sub review is that you had more negatives regarding that and I found this review you almost could not complain apart from the Cyclops date magnifier. Thanks 👍 for all.the help and replies John , I'll let you know when mine arrives .

[@watchreviews4k]

Glad you got it ordered after your problems. Congratulations, excellent choice. I have owned several 42mm Ocean One's and to be honest with you I made the mistake of thinking they would fit my 8" wrist better. But I now realise the 39mm version fits a 7-8" wrist better as the lugs aren't as long, straight, and flat. It wears more like a 40mm due to the pointed crown guards, rather than the blunt square crown guards on a Submariner. As you know I own a Submariner Date; and the truth is the feel good factor from a 39 Cermit is just as good. I actually prefer the case shape of the 39 with the more tapered lugs and pointed crown guards. As I said in my review, really the only negative is the 1.5x cyclops; but that is minor and can be overlooked as they got everything else just right with this piece. This was my favourite Ocean One I have ever owned; I think its one of the best Steinhart have ever made. You will find this yourself; a 39 fits a 7" wrist much better than the 42 version does. Like yourself I also owned a Vintage Red; another personal favourite of mine; its a shame they keep making the 39 version of it for Gnomon rather than selling it on the Steinhart website; as that is a great watch in 39. One thing you will prefer is the 39 case has less gap under the lugs to the wrist; it is a more snug fit than the 42. Let me know what you think of yours when you get it? Wear it in good health. Regards.

[@bruh_oly1370]

@@watchreviews4k thanks John , I agree with you as many owners have said those lugs used to jut out off the wrist . I maybe tried to convince myself with the vintage red it didn't but it must have- it was a bit of a dinner plate when I look at pictures of it on my wrist. Pity as you say Steinhart missed a trick doing a 39 V.Red. I quite still like the painted indices on my skx but will be nice to see the applied indices on this green ceramic. Honestly your review swayed me on this so thanks. There is another Italian guy doing a review in the watch which wasn't too bad but your praise and positivity for the company and this watch just edged me to get it. The best line ever "champagne watch for lemonade money " 👍👌. Speak to you when it arrives , best regards

[@watchreviews4k]

@@bruh_oly1370 Steinhart did make a 39mm Vintage Red; but it was for Gnomon. Regards.

[@popamonkey190]

I like how the youtube Algorithms are giving me more and more suggestions for more reviews from your channel. I am pleased!

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Nam. Glad you enjoy my content. Regards, #WR4K

[@joekelly9369]

They are great quality tough watches , i wear mine for everything over 4 years it still looks and performs great , iv dived to 90m trimix diver , and use heavy engineering tools daily theyre cheap as chips

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching joe. Glad you enjoyed it. Congratulations. Excellent choice. Wear yours in good health. Regards.

[@joekelly9369]

@@watchreviews4k after seeing a friends rolex kermit/ hulk and the steinhart , does make you really wonder where does the other £8200 go on the rolex watch , you cant see where it goes ( ok the face is blacker) thats obvious hands thinner check , BUT it doesnt add up at all

[@watchreviews4k]

@@joekelly9369 I have previously owned a Rolex Hulk, so can appreciate your perspective. I see the Submariner Date as a 2000 Euro piece that is retailed for 8650 Euro. Marketing, sporting event sponsorship, brand ambassadors, Research and Development; are massive costs, and of course profit margin. Check out my PD-1661 versus Submariner Date review; it may interest you. Regards. kzbin.info/www/bejne/bXaXZK13rKplkNE&ab_channel=WatchReviews4K

[@HarryUnchained]

I held both the 39 Kermit and OVM last week, they're both really solid but ended up with OVM due to milsub style hands and dial. Also that cyclops is actually quite a turn off for me, not sure why they haven't' fixed the magnification on that. Other than that the ceramic Kermit is really gorgeous especially under the sun.

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. Excellent choice. Congratulations. I owned the Vintage Military myself and also love the Milsub sword hands. It is a shame Steinhart only sold the 39 version via Gnomon, rather than their own website; as it would have been a popular option to the 42. I think the 39 case looks closer to the Rolex 5517 Milsub proportions. Agreed on the cyclops magnifier. The price difference between 1.5x and 2.5x magnification cyclops is negligible; so no reason for Steinhart not to upgrade. I modded my 42 Ocean One's with Crystal Times double domed sapphire crystals which really enhanced them. It is a shame they don't make crystals for the 39 version. Wear yours in good health. Regards.

[@HarryUnchained]

@@watchreviews4k yeah the price from Gnomon has also increased to $520 right now. I actually bought it from a local fellow watch enthusiast. He bought both 39 Kermit and OVM a while ago and decided to release both in like new condition. I would have gone for the Kermit if not for the cyclops but OVM 39 has that beautiful domed sapphire plus that milsub dial and hands. I also don't mind aluminium insert for that vintage aesthetic.

[@watchreviews4k]

@@HarryUnchained I like the aluminium bezel insert. It suits the case shape better than ceramic; as it's more like the Rolex 16610 case than the 116610LN Supercase. The peach tone of the lume on the Vintage Military is lovely; just like on a 1970's 5517 Milsub when the tritium lime has patina. Agreed on the Kermit, I would prefer it without the cyclops magnifier. The problem with the Ocean One is the bond used is very strong, so its hard to remove the cyclops using a butane blowtorch. One has to remove the crystal from the case first, then use so much heat often the crystal cracks before the bond melts and releases the crystal. With a Pagani Design in comparison it only needs 10-20 seconds heating; and then it pops off easily. With my 42's I just pressed out the crystals and fitted Crystaltimes ones. They also make a nice top hat style crystal for the 42 called the CT116. See link below. I think it really suits the Vintage Military. Regards. usa.crystaltimes.net/shop/products/ct116/

[@HarryUnchained]

@@watchreviews4k thank you for sharing, I'm actually ordering the Pagani 40mm in Kermit. You can't beat that for below $80.

[@watchreviews4k]

@@HarryUnchained Excellent choice. Congratulations. It would be worth you waiting until the 28th March; as AliExpress have their next sale then. The PD-1661's will be under 70 USD with the discount coupons then. Wear yours in good health. Regards.

[@andrewmain8022]

FYI Rolex only have the nos. at 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50. Also somehow the bezel doesn't look quite right without a lume pip. Having said that I think that Steinhart are as well made as Rolex, probably because they don't nave to spend one billion in advertising every year!!!!

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. Yes, I am aware of the Rolex Submariner Date numeral layout. See the review of mine below. Steinhart aren't made as as well as Rolex; however they are excellent build quality for the respective price point. Regards. kzbin.info/www/bejne/fqCvi3yJgNp6m6M&ab_channel=WatchReviews4K

[@rameshdathrampersad9216]

Hey great review once again. I have the 42mm hulk and its like i have the kermit and the hulk in one. The way the hulk plays with the light, sometimes its a black dial like the kermit and then a sunburst green. Wish you would do a review of the hulk soon, and its exhibition caseback is amazing. Thanks again and keep up the great vids.

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching William. Glad you enjoyed it it. Agreed, the Hulk is an excellent piece. I would like to review it; but unfortunately Steinhart do not loan pieces to KZbinrs; so it would mean buying one to make the review (as I did with this piece). Some brands loan me pieces for review which is more viable. Wear yours in good health. Regards.

[@rameshdathrampersad9216]

@@watchreviews4k Ok. Thats cool i understand. Well you keep up the good reviews and wear your pieces in good health to.

[@heinz-haraldfrentzen1261]

Great review, I have the ocean one 39mm in black ceramic. Thinking about a 42mm version of the Kermit.

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Kevin. Glad you enjoyed it. Congratulations, the 39 black is an excellent piece. I have owned both the 39 and 42 versions; and used to think the 42 fitted my 8" wrist better. However since trying the 39, I have now changed my mind; as the lugs aren't as straight and flat; so less gap between the case and wrist. My advice is if you have a 6-7" wrist the 39 Cermit will fit you better. The 42 really is only a good fit for 7-8" wrists. It is often the reason why they are sold soon after purchase due to the gap and straight lugs. Overall I think the 39 Cermit looks better than the 42. Regards.

[@S1lent_Warrior]

Awesome review. Have had my eye on the 39 green ceramic without the cyclops and the 39 vintage red. Can't decide.

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching David. Glad you enjoyed it. Excellent choices. Difficult decision; as both are excellent. I previously owned the 42 Vintage Red and really liked it. The 39 is a better fit. However Steinhart have stopped selling bezel inserts on their website; now one has to return the watch to their HQ in Augsburg, Germany for replacement. This is something to consider, as the aluminium bezel inserts are easy to scratch. I previously owned a Kermit and scratched and dented the insert soon after buying it. Fortunately back then they used to sell them for only 15 Euro. Now they charge more to change it themselves. The ceramic bezels are more scratch resistant, so consider your lifestyle when choosing between them. Regards.

[@S1lent_Warrior]

@@watchreviews4k Thank you for the detailed reply. Ceramic seems to be the way to go. Subscribed!

[@watchreviews4k]

@@S1lent_Warrior You are welcome. Having owned the 42 Kermit, and this 39 Kermit; the 39 is a better fit. Also the ceramic is more practical due to being more scratch resistant. Wear yours in good health. Regards.

[@Star-Biscuit]

Fantastic review and a great watch if you’re at the low/mid tier price point.

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Ross. Glad you enjoyed it. Wear your pieces in good health. Regards.

[@gfrizzleshizzlemanizzle]

low price point? It's hundreds of Euro. The most expensive watch I ever bought. But I love it!

[@JS_-lp7gn]

Is the black dial on this green ceramic Ocean One 39 darker than on the aluminum version? Just wondering if they just replaced the green aluminum bezel insert with the green ceramic insert or if there are other changes in this ceramic version.

[@jamesmcmanamy4704]

Very nice review. I own a gold and stainless Rolex sub and a couple of Pagani Design subs, plus an Apple watch. I just ordered the Ocean 39 in black ceramic and will be fitting the Steinhart jubilee bracelet to it. The design looks very pleasing and I am looking forward to using it the majority of my time. Thanks for the review.

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching James. Glad you enjoyed it. Congratulations. Excellent choice. The Jubilee bracelet is excellent quality. I fitted one to my 39 previously as it really enhances the piece. Wear yours in good health. Regards, #WR4K

[@omg.2tsx_alex593]

Exactly what I’m doing, my Ocean 1 double green ceramic premium in 42mm is arriving this week, I should’ve already ordered the jubilee bracelet but I will soon

[@Romeo-qc4tb]

The best. I just buy the black ceramic in 39mm 😍

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Romeo. Congratulations. Excellent choice. Wear yours in good health. Regards.

[@Romeo-qc4tb]

@@watchreviews4k thank you again for your professional review!!! Simply the best 👍

[@uhALC]

I’m so torn between this or the aluminum version. Love the color of the aluminum bezel but apparently the bezel is ridiculously stiff

[@seayak]

aluminum bezels are more prone to scratching

[@dasku6161]

Beautiful watch and comprehensive review. You went over many details that other channels overlooked like the change in manufacturers and the thicker clasp. I’m thinking of getting this watch and have a few questions. How would you describe the fold over clasp? (The small part where you first use your finger nail to grab that has the logo) Does it feel loose? Also, how is the fitment on the end links? Are they tight or are there gaps when putting pressure on it? How does the crown action feel? Does it feel smooth or gritty? Thanks!

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Das. Glad you enjoyed it. The fliplock feels tight. Good positive click when it snaps shut with no play. The end links are an excellent fit in the case, tight fit, no play, no gaps. The crown thread feels smooth when screwing down, and unscrewing. There is a characteristic firm spring loaded pressure against it when screwing it down, on both the SW200-1 and ETA 2824-2. One can feel the resistance gradually building up when manually winding the mainspring. The crown threading isn't as silky smooth as my Rolex Submariner Date, I would describe it as similar to the feel of a Seiko screw down crown, such as on the SKX007, or SRP777 Turtle; which are both satisfactory in terms of smoothness. Overall it is both excellent quality/value for the respective price point The only real negative as discussed in my review; is the 1.5x magnification of the cyclops magnifier. Regards.

[@dasku6161]

Thank you! I may be pulling the trigger on this! Keep up the excellent work

[@mrlume9475]

Steinhart are a quality watch, I just wish they changed the flat case to mimick the Oyster case therefore sitting on the wrist better.

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. Agreed, it would fit better if they used the 16610 case profile. Regards, #WR4K

[@mrlume9475]

@@watchreviews4k Yes, that case style would be perfect.👍

[@watchreviews4k]

@David Cat Thank you for watching David. Regards, #WR4K

[@jeffdolgin7436]

Wonder if it would fit nice on my 7.25 wrist? The 42mm sits too flat and with the pointy lugs looks terrible.

[@watchreviews4k]

@@jeffdolgin7436 Thank you for watching Jeff. Yes. See my recent Ocean 39 Marine Black review where I discuss this in detail. Regards, #WR4K

[@MsBricktop80]

Thanks for the video! 🙂

[@MishaRGB]

Great review! Thank you. You actually forgot to show the bezel movement

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Mikhail. Glad you enjoyed it. Correct. Apologies for the mistake. Regards, #WR4K

[@isidrosevier1125]

Can't wait to see a full bussdown version of these watches. Bussdown is my preference. Especially in a oyster braclet.

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Isidro. Regards, #WR4K

[@MrLoughneagh]

What's a bussdown when you're at home??

[@watchreviews4k]

@@MrLoughneagh Thank you for watching. The term bustdown refers to an original luxury watch being taken apart (bust down), then drilled and filled with diamonds or other gemstones. Regards, #WR4K

[@stewartboyd3128]

nice review. rolex killer

[@erictassone6959]

Great video very helpful thank you

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Eric. Glad you enjoyed it. Regards.

[@kws4e]

Just found your channel and I'm blown away. I like the in depth style you are doing, and also that you aren't afraid to say the negative things about a watch. Also, the image quality and the lightning are spot on! You should concider reviewing/comparing the San Martin Water Ghost to the Steinhart. At around 150€ in a Sale, the San Martin offers comparable quality in regards to the fit and finishing.

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. Glad you enjoyed it. I asked San Martin to send me a Ghost Diver and they refused. Some brands loan watches, some gift watches, some pay me to review their watches. Other brands such as Steinhart don't send watches to KZbinrs for review, so I had to spend 455 Euro to buy this Kermit for review for example. I don't want to spend 150 Euro on a Ghost Diver and sell it at a loss (as it isn't a watch I want myself). However, if you would like me to buy one for review then please feel free to make a donation to my channel via Paypal. Regards.

[@kws4e]

@@watchreviews4k That seem legit, I totally understand that. I onwed 5 Water Ghost so far and sold every single on with profit. I got 170-190€ for each of them.

[@kws4e]

Used.

[@watchreviews4k]

@@kws4e The problem I have with Chinese Aliexpress brands like San Martin is they email me asking me to review their watches. I reply and agree to review their watch, and say send me one. Then they come back and say we can't send you one, but you can but one at X% discount. So the brand expects one to make a review to help sell their watch; free marketing; and one has to pay them for the watch too. Yes, the V3 Water Ghost is a great watch I would like to review; but not at my own expense; and San Martin's benefit. Other brands are more reasonable, as they will either loan, or gift a watch for review. In the case of the larger brands they will also pay for a review. I appreciate its possible to buy V3's in Aliexpress sales using discount coupons, then resell them at profit on eBay. Several UK sellers are doing that. However it isn't something that interests me. I prefer to do giveaways to my subscribers with the gifted watches I receive from brands; rather than selling them on eBay. Regards.

[@rutgerv.6050]

Nice review thank you. Great looking watch. I just wish they did something different to stand out a bit more, and do something unique. Now everybody will think that you are wearing a “fake” Still.. gonna think about buying this.

[@watchreviews4k]

Steinhart released this Kermit before Rolex did ironically. In reality very few people notice watches. The few that do, are able to discern if a watch is a Rolex or Steinhart. If one was wearing a Rolex they might think it is a fake; but not if wearing a Steinhart as it doesn't say Rolex on the dial. Regards, #WR4K

[@rutgerv.6050]

@@watchreviews4k thank you for your answer. And i agree with you. When I woke this morning I never heared of steinhart but now I kinda think this will be my next watch. Im a bit impulsive though so ill give myself a week :-) I bought a omega seamaster 300M the day before christmas last year so Im still in my honeymoon. I also have a orient kamasu red dial which I wear more frequent ( because I dont want to damage the omega) and This kermit dial would be a great addition. On the video the steinhart also looks way better finished than the orient.

[@seayak]

People are more likely to think you are wearing a fake if you are actually wearing a branded Rolex, because there are so many knockoffs circulating. This is a high quality Swiss watch made by a German company, and people who would think it is a fake just don't know what they are talking about. Besides people who are not watch snobs (which includes most people on the planet) will simply react to how it looks, and it looks terrific.

[@paulvon2378]

Such a great watch so a low price

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Paul. Glad you enjoyed it. Regards, #WR4K

[@RGMGDA]

Great Review!👍 Lovely Watch!👌

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. Glad you enjoyed it. Regards.

[@pilou6457]

Thank you great video and superb watch🤩👍

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Pilou. Glad you enjoyed it. Regards, #WR4K

[@lucymellace2906]

Excellent review

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. Glad you enjoyed it. Regards.

[@bruh_oly1370]

I forgot to ask John. How did you work out that you had the Selita SW 200 in your watch and not the 2824? Did you open it ? Thanks

[@watchreviews4k]

Yes, I removed the caseback to check. That is the only way one can tell, as the ETA 2824-2 and SW200-1 both feel the same when hand winding and setting the time. Steinhart use both movements equally in the 39. Both are élaboré grade, and have the same build quality, accuracy, reliability; so it really doesn't matter which one gets. The only difference is the SW200-1 has 26 jewels rather than 25 jewels; but the extra jewel added has no positive benefit to performance. Regards.

[@bjorremeijer2072]

Im debating wheter or not to choose this one instead of the “double green premium” model. The display caseback of the “premium” model doesn’t really justify the €150 pricegap, tho I like the double green color..

[@orwellknew9112]

The double green has a more expensive movement. Not sure how much that adds to their cost in addition to the sapphire case back. I’m leaning towards the double green myself. I love how the bezel and the dial switch colours depending on the lighting. In some lighting they both look green, in some the bezel looks black and in other lighting the dial looks black. It adds another dimension to the watch. I could do without the see-through case back, because the movement is pretty plain looking to me. But maybe, I’ll change my mind once Zi have the watch in my hands.

[@seayak]

@@orwellknew9112 So which one did you wind up getting?

[@maheshworthapa3136]

Excellent

[@philosofar]

Brilliant review!! Subbed

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Akshay. Glad you enjoyed it. Regards, #WR4K

[@philosofar]

@@watchreviews4k Absolutely. On the fence on whether to add this to my humble collection; Either this or a Marathon Navigator or something from Islander Watches; like that Datejust homage? Dunno; but yeah this Steinhart ticks all boxes !!

[@Ott0vonBismarck]

How would this compare to the Cronos l6005? Thanks

[@watchreviews4k]

The Ocean One 39 has higher quality finishing overall. Regards, #WR4K

[@dennischen8887]

If my grail watch is the Rolex hulk would I be satisfied with this or always have it in the back of my mind for the Hulk? I already have a Rolex sub date, standard black bezel though. Legit question.

[@watchreviews4k]

Only you can answer that question. Regards, #WR4K

[@therealcountrybumpkin]

I’m just a random guy on the internet, so my opinion doesn’t mean much. If I had a Rolex already I would probably just wear it everyday until I die. The price alone is unreal and for the amount of money it cost, should be put to use lol. After a lot of thinking about the price of some of these watches. It’s insane. Like, part of me would be kinda embarrassed walking around with a 10k-20k watch. I mean, it’s not like it’s THAT much better than something like a Steinhart. I could understand 2-3k for something really nice but this is insane. Better bet, if you absolutely have your heart set on it, wait another year or two. The worlds about to go through some changes and people will be dropping watches left and right.

[@morphilou]

@@therealcountrybumpkin today you have several watch like rolex for 10-20% OF PRICE rolex it is 90% marketing for the snobs at 20k you have a indepedant watch at 100 copy by year an hand to made rolex it is 1.2 million of watch by year ^_^

[@daynevickers1079]

Another great review, thanks! I'm curious if this watch could be purchased with one or more half links on the bracelet, as in the 39mm Gnomon version, or if Steinhart sells the half links separately? I'm considering this one as my next purchase, but I'm very finicky about getting the fit just right. Thanks again for your hard work.

[@watchreviews4k]

I don't know Dayne. You would have to email Steinhart. Regards, #WR4K

[@sensible202]

They come with 2 half links.

[@seayak]

@@sensible202 yup, the bracelet comes extra long, with half links on both sides. I had to take two links from each side to fit my 7 1/4 inch wrist. Plus there are four holes for micro adjustment on the clasp, an another on the strap attachment, so there is all the adjustability you need.

[@AntenneAC-ln4nm]

Wonderful, but too small for your wrist, isn't it? I have the 42(.4) mm Ocean One Vintage Red, and I got the Impression, that the Dial is nearly the same diameter. Is it true, that they only uses wider Bezels?

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Achim. I have owned several 42 versions and used to think the suited my 8" wrist. But recently my tastes have changed and I prefer 39 and 40mm cases. I think the 39 case fits better than the 42 as less gap under the lugs. Regards.

[@johnnash7350]

I'm thinking about this watch but not the Germit.. I can't find much mention even on their website about what kind of movement they use.. and the accuracy..

[@watchreviews4k]

See link below John. Under the "Product Description" tab the movement is detailed. I also detail the movement, and accuracy in this review. The ETA 2824-2 and SW200-1 élaboré grade movements are both used in the Ocean One 39. Regards, #WR4K www.steinhartwatches.de/en/diver-watch/diver-watch-39mm/ocean-39-black-ceramic.html

[@johnnash7350]

@@watchreviews4k Ok thanks..

[@patricj951]

Thanks for a valuable review! Steinhart is a new brand for me and very interesting. One thing I read some users considered as a negative thing is the flat lugs, and that's also noticeable in your video. This makes the watch to be too flat on the wrist, according to some opinions. Is it anything you have thought about? Some people have sold their watches because of that and I am not sure how I will perceive it.

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Patric. Glad you enjoyed it. Yes, the Ocean One does have flat lugs, and a gap between the case and wrist. It is indeed a common reason why collectors sell their watch soon after buying it. The gap is larger in the 42 than the 39 version. It really depends on your wrist size. If you have a 6-7" wrist you will notice the gap under the case more. if you have a 7-8" wrist it is less noticeable due to the wider, flat area the case sits on. So my advise is this, if you have a 7-8" wrist the 39 will be a good fit. If you have a 6-7" wrist you will need to try it, and see if you like the fit or not. Bear in mind Steinhart have a 14 day return policy; so if you don't remove the plastic you can try it and return it if unhappy with it. Regards.

[@patricj951]

@@watchreviews4k Thanks for reply! I measure my wrist to 6,7". I have a Tissot Gentleman and it has around 1mm longer lug to lug distance. It works great while it's probably on the upper level of size for my wrist. The lugs are more bent down than Steinhart, though. I will consider how I will do. By the way: great channel, just subscribed!

[@watchreviews4k]

@@patricj951 You are welcome Patric. The Ocean One 39 will be a good fit for your 6.7" wrist. Regards.

[@DaneFerolin]

Just ordered

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Dane. Congratulations. Excellent choice. Wear yours in good health. Regards.

[@halua1969]

I dont think there's weight of the watch mentioned in this video, please mention the weight of the watches in your videos thanks

[@watchreviews4k]

The watch weighs 170 grams. Regards, #WR4K

[@mmb4063]

Can you tell if there is a sellita or ETA movement in the watch without opening the watch? Received mine 1 week ago and very content with it. Excellent review by the way👍🏻

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. Glad you enjoyed it. Congratulations, excellent choice. No, the SW200-1 and ETA 2824-2 both feel the same when handwinding. Also there isn't a difference in the sound of the rotor when automatically winding. So the only way to tell which one your watch has is to remove the caseback. One can either look for the ETA engraving on the movement, or 25/26 jewels (SW200-1 is 26, ETA 2824-2 is 25). Other than the extra jewel added, the SW200-1 is a clone of the ETA 2824-2. Both are élaboré grade, regulated in 3 positions. Steinhart use both movements equally in the Ocean One. They started using SW200-1 as an alternative to ETA 2824-2 when the supply of ETA movements was restricted to non Swatch Group brands (ETA is Swatch Group owned). Also the price per piece for SW200-1 is less expensive than ETA 2824-2; so there is more profit margin for Steinhart in using Sellita rather than ETA. I have had both in my Ocean One's and had no problems with either. Similar accuracy with both; typically within +/- 5 seconds per day. Wear yours in good health. Regards.

[@mmb4063]

thanks for your elaborate answer 🙏🏻

[@ivankerr3570]

Great review as always. Would be great if you could do a feature on Steinhart stupid decision to not sell Bezel inserts anymore. It was easy when you were selling a Steinhart and perhaps the Bezel needed replaced especially on the aluminium versions as it only cost15 to 30 euros. Now the watch must be returned for exchange bezel at a cost of about 80 euros plus shipping. For example there is a nice Kermit for sale on eBay but the bezel is scratched and needs a replacement. I would have bought this and simply sourced a replacement bezel from Steinhart. Now I wouldn’t touch it as it will cost far too much to fix. Shame on Steinhart . I emailed them and all they would say that it was a company decision. Do they now think they are Rolex. ?

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching ivan. Glad you enjoyed it. Agreed, it is a shame Steinhart no longer sell bezel inserts. I scratched the (aluminium) bezel on my Kermit 42 and they were out of stock of green bezels at the time, so I changed it to black. It was more convenient to pay 15 Euro for the insert, rather than return the watch to Augsburg and have Steinhart change it; as you rightly say it costs 80 Euro to do this. Very expensive considering they only charge 150 Euro to service an Ocean One with ETA 2824-2 or SW 200-1. It comes down to profit, as it was more profitable for Steinhart to charge 80 Euro for bezel changes; than to sell inserts online for 15 Euro. I suggested to Günter Steinhart they offer online customisation options to the Ocean One (both in 39 and 42). For example, black dial; and the buyer selects Jubilee/Oyster bracelet, and selects the bezel ceramic/aluminium, and also blue/black/green/etc. But he wasn't interested in doing this. I also suggested they make a blue dial/bezel 39 version of the Premium Blue 42. Sadly they made the Snowflake Submariner homage for Gnomon in 39 rather than for Steinhart themselves. They really need a 39 blue bezel/dial Smurf homage (same spec as the Double Green/Hulk). I am currently considering purchasing their 39 Hulk as I like the exhibition caseback which feels smoother than the engraved 39 caseback with diagonal lines. Wear yours in good health. Regards.

[@ChrisHopkinsGuitar]

Hi, have you ever tried the Davosa Ternos Ceramic? If so how does it compare to Steinhart Ocean 39 in your opinion?

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. I haven't handled that piece so cannot give an opinion on it. Regards.

[@ivankerr3570]

Great review nice photography. I wonder why Steinhart doesn’t do some Tudor homages like the BB 58 etc. They already have a 39mm case . All they would need to do is a new dial and hands. I know that Gnomon watches already do a Ocean Blue but it’s the wrong colour .

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching ivan. Glad you enjoyed it. I would like Steinhart to make a Black Bay 59 homage too. I dislike the Gnomon piece as it has "Gnomon" on the dial. Also I dislike the direction Steinhart are going in using Tudor Snowflake hands on homages to the GMT Master. Their two-tone PVD plated watches look dreadful. There is demand in the market for a 39mm Ocean One Black Bay 58. Why don't they make one? Günter Steinhart probably isn't interested in making one. Regards.

[@ivankerr3570]

You can get a Steinhart branded without the Gnomon on the dial but the colour is wrong

[@watchreviews4k]

@@ivankerr3570 Yes, I am aware. It is a shame Steinhart don't make a 39 blue. I emailed Günter Steinhart back in 2019 asking him to make a Tudor Snowflake Submariner homage with the 39's case. He wasn't interested back then; but later made the Gnomon version. It is a shame he didn't just make a blue version available on their own website rather than Gnomons. I don't like the Explorer dial 39 as they put 100 metres on the dial; and that doesn't make sense as we all know the 39 is a 300 metre water resistant watch. They should have used their 39 Vintage GMT case for a blue Black Bay 58 homage; that would have looked better than the Gnomon version using the 39's case. Regards.

[@vargusalex]

Good looking watch and great review. Is the cyclops misaligned?

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. Glad you enjoyed it. No, it is aligned correctly. Regards.

[@alexharris8500]

Excellent vedio 🥃🥃🥃

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Alex. Glad you enjoyed it. Regards.

[@mediastarguest]

I've come back to this review several times as I still can't make up my mind between the stunning piece in question and Steinhart's Vintage Red with black dial and red text but I suppose both have similar movements. Could you clear up one doubt I have though; Are Steinhart's 39mm sized watches available directly from Germany ? Because I've heard they have to be ordered from Gnomon in Singapore, therefore entailing customs duties payable on entry into Europe. All the best, cheers.

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. The 39mm versions are available on the Steinhart website. The Vintage Red is only available in 42mm. Regards, #WR4K

[@1SaG]

You can get the Vintage Red in 39mm - but only from Gnomon in Singapore. Alternatively, you could call or email the Steinhart boutique in Aachen, Germany. A quick Google search will lead you to their website. They usually have the 39mm Gnomon exclusive versions in stock. I bought all my Steinharts there, including the Gnomon only 39mm OVM and 39mm Marine Blue.

[@bruh_oly1370]

Excellent review, is the bezel action of the same standard as the 42mm?

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. Glad you enjoyed it. Yes, the same bezel action as the 42mm. Some collectors have reported the bezel is tight to turn initially; but loosens up the more it is used. I found this one to be the same as several 42mm versions I have previously owned. Regards.

[@bruh_oly1370]

@@watchreviews4k great to hear. I was thinking of the updated black 39mm version with the newer ceramic insert but this seems very nice also . Out of curiosity did you produce a couple of reviews with the ovm and vintage red with revised clasps maybe a year ago ? I remember you asked them to send you the revised clasps as they were using the older rounded edged clasp rather than the polished bevelling on the clasp

[@watchreviews4k]

@@bruh_oly1370 The black ceramic version is also excellent (and 10 Euro less expensive). Yes, I reviewed several 42mm versions on my old channel. You may remember I also modified some with Jubilee bracelets, and Crystaltimes double domed sapphire crystals (without the cyclops). I had a Premium Blue on a Jubilee bracelet with double domed sapphire crystal. I now realise I made a mistake always buying the 42mm versions; thinking it would best fit my 8" wrist. The 39 case is better proportioned and fits better. The later revised clasp from Palladium AG is much better than the early Grovana ones you speak of. Yes, I did ask Steinhart to change my mine. Fortunately the 39's are all using the revised clasp now. I suggested to Gunter Steinhart that he make a 39 version of the Premium Blue; with the new engraved ceramic bezel. Unfortunately he decided to make a homage to the Tudor Snowflake Submariner for Gnomon in 39mm instead. I would have preferred he make it for Steinhart without the Gnomon text on the dial as it spoils it. Perhaps in the future he will make a Smurf ceramic version like the Cermit in 39; which would be nice. Regards.

[@bruh_oly1370]

@@watchreviews4k I've digested all you have said and have chosen to buy this watch over the 42mm ovm. I have a 7.5" wrist and this would be better proportioned as you mention. Ive considered the 39mm black version but this one seems to be nicer. What do you think of the double green version ?

[@watchreviews4k]

@@bruh_oly1370 Apologies for the delay in replying. I know you have now ordered the Cermit. I have 96 videos on my channel now, so struggle to keep up with replying to all the comments to be honest with you. The 39 black, and 39 Cermit; are both excellent. Personally I prefer the Cermit as the green bezel is more eye catching, and I also like that although the Ocean One is a homage to the Submariner Date; ironically Steinhart released their Cermit before Rolex themselves did. So one could argue they didn't copy the Rolex Cermit. The double green Hulk 39 is one of the greatest watches Steinhart have ever made. I really like the exhibition caseback, and think the tone of green on the bezel and dial are a better match than on the Rolex Hulk. Prior to owning my Submariner Date, I owned a Submariner (no-date); and before that a Hulk. Honestly the Steinhart Hulk is better looking as the green on the dial is slightly darker; closer to the bezel. The Rolex Hulk bezel dial was too light in comparison. Difficult choice to make between the Steinhart Cermit or Hulk? As both are lovely looking. Personally I don't think its worth the premium to get the exhibition caseback on the Hulk. The Cermit is better value; and the contrast between the black dial and green bezel is very pleasing. Overall I think you made the correct decision buying a 39 Cermit. Wear yours in good health. Regards.

[@morphilou]

sugess is good also for 200 euros i like davosa but it is 1000 + the eprfect watch for me it is the ginault better that rolex for 1500

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. Regards, #WR4K

[@tylerconlon1990]

Steinhart most expensive Paul Newman is amazing

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Tyler. Regards, #WR4K

[@bruh_oly1370]

Just a quick question John if that's ok? Do you think it's wiser to order from Steinhart or from the UK authorised dealer ? Slightly cheaper from the UK authorised dealer at the minute? What did you do ?

[@watchreviews4k]

I purchased direct from Steinhart. Reason being if one purchases from a dealer; in the event of a warranty claim Steinhart won't deal with it (they refer one back to the dealer). The reality is dealers often don't have the ability to deal with warranty repairs; as Steinhart have the parts. So the dealer ends up returning the watch to Steinhart for repair; which lengthens the whole process. Better to deal direct and cut out the middleman. Yes, the discount appears attractive now. But later on if there is a problem; you will wish you just dealt with Steinhart direct. I have had to return a Premium Blue myself as it arrived with scratches on the case. Steinhart immediately offered to cover the return shipping via Fedex, and when they received it back; offered either a full refund or new watch. So excellent customer service experience. 2 week turnaround in total to get the problem resolved. With a dealer it takes longer to resolve such issues. Regards.

[@bruh_oly1370]

@@watchreviews4k thank you for that affirmative reply 👍. Do you think it will be dispatched before January 1st if I order now ?

[@watchreviews4k]

@@bruh_oly1370 Yes. Shipping from Germany to UK via Fedex typically takes 5 working days. Regards.

[@marvoski547]

Added to my wish list lol

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching. Regards.

[@anthonyridgeway6950]

I've been considering this watch and your review has sold it to me. Can I ask do you think a 48mm lug to lug such as this one would look foolish on my 6.25 inch wrist?

[@watchreviews4k]

Thank you for watching Anthony. Glad you enjoyed it. 48mm lug to lug is a perfect fit for a 6-7" wrist. At 6.25" it will fit you very well; with good comfort wearing for long periods of time as a daily wear piece. Regards.

[@anthonyridgeway6950]

@@watchreviews4k Thank you for the quick reply and just read your other comments from other viewers. You really do engage with your viewers great to see.

[@watchreviews4k]

@@anthonyridgeway6950 I have 120 videos on my channel now, so it is hard for me to reply to every comment. However I try to reply to as many as possible. Regards, #WR4K