Stillen Supercharged Infiniti G37S vs. Dodge Challenger

[@eltingville81]

How is this a supercharged G37 coupe when a stock version does basically the same quarter mile numbers?

[@Cheeseypoofs85]

bad launch from lack of traction

[@Jaredscott89]

fucking stock G37's running abover 110mph! ahaha idiot.

[@jasonredepenning]

@@Jaredscott89 ?

[@derekhinski5860]

It's not supercharged. It's a lie

[@Ms-kl6fs]

@@Jaredscott89 I did that the other day, only have a cold air intake and tune, 114 to be exact

[@AliG-oi6uo]

Absolutely NOT A supercharged G37 ROFL

[@CarandRacer]

Ali G First, it isn't my car. That said, I've owned a G37S many moons ago - they run (at best) 13.9's at 104 MPH with great DA. On average 14.0-14.2's at 102 MPH. I don't know how much direct (meaning you do it) experience you have with racing (you have zero videos of any car you own on your channel) - but a 110 MPH trap (and he ran 112 in another video) - is proof by itself that this car had more that a CAI and exhaust on it. Trap speed is the cars potential, ET is traction. But you were ROFL'ing - please do let me know what you think this car is. Stock?

[@NIGHTMAREuki]

+CarandRacer dude, 03 Nissan maxima with 255 HP dips into 13's. Boosted G37 is well into 12, even 11

[@CarandRacer]

+NIGHTMAREuki Lol, this video...Dude. Where to start? There is the internet and then there is real-life experience. Let's take your 255 2003 Maxima's running 13's. First thing real-life experience people know is that there is ET and then there is Trap speed. There is 60 foot and then there is potential power. I have seen Maxima's hit 14.3's for example - but with a 97 MPH trap. What does this tell us? That the car may have been quick enough, perhaps due to good traction from a nice prep to eek out a low 14 second run stock. But the 97 MPH tells me his car is not very powerful (but still about right for that car). Magazines - such as Car and Driver tested the 2003 Maxima and got a 14.7 ET - but here's the thing - with the same trap speed as the guy who ran a 14.3. This means his traction/60 foot, likely due to being tested on an unprepped road, is what caused the discrepancy. So what does this have to do with this video and the car in it that I don't own? His trap speed was between 112 and 114 MPH all night. Now - if his tune is not optimal, that trap speed may improve - I don't know the size of the SC he was running, nor at what boost - which can in fact make someone get into the low 12's and high 11's - but what the 112 to 114 MPH does tell me is that his car - as it sits - is a mid 12 second car with a half decent 60 foot - which he was not getting. This is why, when I went to the track with my actual car, an Alpha 16 GTR, a couple of weeks ago and only ran a 9.0 at 169 MPH on medium boost due to a terrible 1.7 60 foot (which is why we stayed on my medium boost setting as I was getting wheel hop and there was no point turning it up) - we stopped and just dialed in the car for the rest of the track rental. Now we will go out next week and see what the car can really do. My point? My trap speed tells me all I need to know - the potential of what my car can do. Puts on Toretto voice; ask any racer and they will tell you - trap speed lets you know the cars potential - not the ET. There were two cars with low and mid 160 MPH traps that pulled mid 8 and low 8's respectively that same day. My same package in the US has gone 8.11, 7.99 and 7.97 - so it all becomes about the 60 foot. Videos of that day are also on my channel. Peace.

[@NIGHTMAREuki]

+CarandRacer here is a turbo AWD sedan trapping 121 watch?v=1ruMej3_hxg

[@CarandRacer]

+NIGHTMAREuki Sigh. I am going to guess you didn't read all of my response? All this video does is prove my point. 121 MPH is usually good for a high 11 with an average to not so great 60 foot. Here's my stock MB running an identical time with the same trap speed - watch?v=j3co9eaQTbs. This is not a slam, but I am going to guess you may not have as much direct, at the track experience. Any car can be made fast. There are 8 second and faster civics. What I am writing about is how ET and Trap Speed work. And that through the trap speed I can tell what potential the car has ET wise. It doesn't mean they will get that ET or that we should say that car has done it - only that it is possible. I agree a 13.64 is not a good ET for his mods. But his trap speed says he can do a lot better.Peace.

[@FishingBAM86]

That Challenger sounds like it needs Mucinex.

[@yolsclassics6347]

G37 needs better tires...

[@StephenKimbrell]

i ran a 13.4 with bolt ons and no tune

[@automotivetv9861]

Yea in dry weather... this was wet weather.

[@CarandRacer]

I actually owned a stock G37 before my GTR & ran a consistent 14.2 at 102 MPH. Track temps and DA can make the difference between a 14.2 and 13.9 ET. The key difference here is his MPH; 110. With good traction and conditions - that is a mid-high 12 second car. I'm running 9.90's but at 147 MPH on pump gas - with slicks - that would be a low to mid 9 second run. When I try my race fuel settings my R888's won't hold the power so my ET will suck, but my MPH should be 155+. Videos on my channel.

[@andrwb9971]

G’s will forever be great😅

[@JustAnotherUnderwood]

No forced induction on that G.

[@CarandRacer]

Lol...it would be easier for me to remove the post. Yes the ET was terrible. But as any drags guy knows - trap speed is what you look at for potential power. No stock or FBO G is trapping 110+ MPH.

[@CarandRacer]

Lol. Come on. You would be lucky to run a 13.3 with those mods on the best DA and track prep in the world. 12.1 is at least a 115 MPH trap. Stock trap 102-104 MPH.

[@CarandRacer]

You may be a highly experienced driver - but I am sorry - you are not a highly experienced drag racer. Exhaust and intake bolt ons will not take a 13.9-14.1 NA car down to 12.1's. This is not me speaking - this is science. This is why I know - not guessing - you have very little experience here. You should have went with 13.3's or similar. But 12.1's? You would make alot of G owners very happy to believe they are now faster than an M4 with just exhaust/intake bolt ons on an NA car lol...With a blower - yes - depending on its size, your tune and many other things - could possibly get you into the 11.5's.

[@Allmotorzl1]

Lmao bull crap you're running those numbers... Oh and i had no clue Greddy had a supercharger kit out for the VQ37VHR.... Sigh... Get off of KZbin kid.

[@ChristiannTyler]

I didn't think it was slow by any means just was clarifying, do you have the brake toggle switch so you can spin the wheels while on the brake? Because I know from my ipl you try an heat the tires up as soon as you touch the brake it cuts the power

[@CarandRacer]

Ctyler93 Got it...This isn't my car. Many people have given this poor guy a hard time because they feel his ET isn't fast enough. I was filming alot of cars while my car was being worked on. I have many videos of cars at my local track.I did have a G37S as a daily about 5 years ago (a 2009) - I loved that car.

[@indiegamedevleven]

Is supercharger worth it for the VQ? 13.64 is slower than my NA..😮

[@CarandRacer]

Like anything else..if is tuned/setup properly - yes. This car was not. And your car is NA not stock if you run 13.64. The trap speed shows the potential is there - with 110-112 MPH trap speeds - but the ET doesn't match. Those are 12 second ET trap speeds. He did the install himself - and it shows.

[@indiegamedevleven]

@@CarandRacer Thanks for the explanation. Yes, stock NA runs like 15s at 3000ft da.. Mine got high flow cats, methanol, lighter wheel and wider tire... I was thinking about supercharge it, but it feels like a big project for me... Thank you!

[@XfireBlake]

We sell 1 godzilla each year, and the last one was a black edition in blue! We sold it to a 19 year old asian kid who's dad was a diplomat. Tried to pay with a starter check and had to go back for a cashiers check, but it was good for 108,000 dollars!! What a car, but i got to go fast on a budget;)

[@Terry1212]

Why does it say the Challenger trapped 69 mph?

[@CarandRacer]

It doesn't say the Challenger trapped 69 MPH - not sure where you are seeing that.

[@Terry1212]

@@CarandRacerAt 0:37, where it shows the G37 trapping 110 mph on the right, is that not showing the Challenger's trap speed on the left?

[@CarandRacer]

@@Terry1212 You are correct. Obviously a problem with that run. Most people complain about the G37. I wasn't prepared for a Challenger question lol.

[@XfireBlake]

Needswings Single 3" intake, Stock manifolds with larger inlet tubes and teflon coating, 65MM SC pulley 3 psi over stock, and mail off canned INMotion tune. Stock cooling and TSW Wheels that are actually heavier by a couple pounds. I sell Nissan and I like the VQ series, but mods don't do much unless you spend big money for twin turbo. What boost does the SC push? Traction is tougher with manual trans and no DR's.

[@phiz4842]

whats a good TT kit?

[@ChristiannTyler]

The g37 did a 13.64?

[@CarandRacer]

It did. The car had massive wheelspin. The key is the trap speed - G37's trap 102 on average and 104 at the most stock. He was trappng into the 112 MPH range which should be good for a low 13 or high 12. I know alot of people think this is slow - but alot of people have no experience at the track.

[@CarandRacer]

The SRT 6 is definitely a great platform - although, I'm guessing you will likely have an intake, intercooler, heat exchanger, and intake manifolds besides the pulley and tune mods to hit 12.1's at 114-115 MPH. For only the supercharger - the G37 did okay for such a heavy car - and I have a video on my channel where he hits a 112 MPH trap. With a better tune and some supporting mods I'm sure he can hit mid to low 12's. Cheers and Thanks for Watching!

[@halo3pownage]

That's a v8 though right? The z has a v6 so unless I swap the v8 from the GTR GT3 car I'll always make a bit less power than you assuming we have the same mods. But back on topic, IMO the challenger is slow and heavy compared to other cars in its class. It won't stop me from liking it and wanting to buy one but that's just my opinion. You can throw numbers at me all day long. That won't change my opinion about the car but its still a really nice car and it drives pretty well

[@B2008Gx]

Another good match up.

[@wer170]

My stock G37 ran 13.7 stock. You mean to tell me a stillen supercharged G37 ran 13.6? Nah.

[@CarandRacer]

This isn't my car - although I was there filming. Stock G37's in perfect air still struggle with even a 13.9 - and at 102-104 MPH. For those who have experience racing drags, the key to look for here (and with any car running the 1/4) is the cars MPH. This G37 was running 110-114 MPH. MPH is the power potential of the car. ET is traction. He had zero traction - but the MPH shows that he had a power adder. Was it properly tuned? Probably not. But an extra 10 MPH to stock proves it was modified.

[@svt89]

The car is faster than both the ss and 5.0 when there all stock.And there isnt even a tune out for the new challengers or chargers yet.

[@svt89]

The new 392 srts run low 12s all day and wiegh 4300lbs

[@b58forever]

svt89 392 don't run low 12s that's a lie. I have a 2007 e550 and my car run 4.7-13.2 I race a 392 challenger and here never pull on me so either my cars is faster than advertiser numbers or challenger is overrated.

[@vincentgciardullo869]

It's either supercharged with a horrible driver or non supercharged with a good driver

[@CarandRacer]

It's a reasonable comment - except for the MPH. Great driver can affect ET - but MPH - not as much. 110-112 MPH is modified - so the answer is A I am afraid.

[@svt89]

That was the old model 6.1 425hp vs the new 6.4 475hp.And carrys over 4100lbs and runs a [e-mail] a 300hp bmw run those times with that much wieght hell no.

[@SportsMusicCars]

13.75 vs. 13.64 is a close race. I own a 2012 G37 RWD with nothing but K&N box filters. I'm guessing it runs high 13s, but a 13.64 would be something it would achieve only with at least a solid 93 tune, intake & exhaust work. Pretty sure if it was supercharged and tuned properly, mid 12's would be where it would be at.

[@CarandRacer]

This video keeps me going lol...As per my other comments below and above...it isn't the ET everyone should be worrying about...it's the MPH. ET is (mostly) traction. These cars - of which I had one - will run 14.0-14.2 on a poopy prep test and tune day.The key here is though - they will run that at 102-104 MPH. The car in this video was running 110 MPH - and also ran a 112 MPH that day. No stock G37 will run that MPH - ever. A 110-112 MPH trap will though allow you to run a mid to mid high12 second pass though if you can launch the car - which this gentleman - could not.

[@whoischris28]

Stillens kit doesn’t make much power, it’s a bottom tier kit

[@nelsonortiz9909]

This g isn't supercharged. I have a g37 2013 xs coupe and its stock and this g not doing better than mine. Somebody's lying lol

[@CarandRacer]

Honestly - I have replied more to this video than any of my other videos and it isn't even my car lol. As per my oh so many responses; it's the MPH folks. Not the ET. Unless your bone stock XS is trapping 110-112 MPH (it isn't) - you now know the car is modified. Likely poorly tuned - and without proper traction - thus the stockish ET.

[@Cheeseypoofs85]

drag radials will put him in the 12s

[@rabbitolychee6395]

13.6 1/4 where my G37 S with an exhaust does a 13.2.... Yeah nah, why the cap

[@CarandRacer]

Lol...these comments never end. First - no G37S is running 13.6. Definitely not 13.2 with an exhaust. With that out of the way - it's the MPH folks. Not the ET. ET is traction - MPH is power. Your G37S anything isn't running 110-112 MPH in the 1/4 (you run 104-106 MPH at best). Thus his car being modified. No Cap.

[@rabbitolychee6395]

@@CarandRacer Highest I've done is a 13.5 with a bit of slipage on the launch. Even people on the forums have a 33.5% average 1/4 time on these cars of 13.4 1/4 bone stock. Either u have a bad launch, or you just don't know how to drive (sorry) it just doesn't seem right at all.

[@CarandRacer]

@@rabbitolychee6395 You mean quickest you have run is a 13.5...and no you have not. I don't know what your 33.5% average means. 13.4 - average - for a bone stock manual G37S? Absolutely 100% nope. Please do post your 13.5 run or a timeslip in a video for me - you have a channel. That said - you still have not answered the question - what MPH did you trap running "13.5"? As to my driving - I think it's fair to say I can race a manual okay - my videos are on my channel.

[@halo3pownage]

OK what about the boss 302 or the zr1? Those are the top end ford and Chevy muscle cars. Both of which push 500+HP stock and probably run low 11s If you're gonna compare top end dodge you have to compare it to top end Chevy and top end ford, what you're doing is comparing a gtr to a 370z. If you're gonna compare than compare apples to apples. Not apples to oranges.

[@andrwb9971]

That’s more like FBO g37x if it was supercharged he would have gapped even worse

[@CarandRacer]

This video continues to get the same comments lol. MPH. MPH is the indicator - not ET. ET is traction. No FBO G37 is trapping 110-112 MPH. I recognize not everyone races and this is not common knowledge.

[@halo3pownage]

you're right a bmw probably couldnt do that with that much weight but cars dont need to weight that much to begin with dont get me wrong i love the challenger and its classic muscle car look but that car is a tank and its slow compared to sports cars unless you can get 700whp

[@zayloe999]

i thought that said stolen

[@svt89]

A stock 5.0 runs high 12s and is around 3600lbs a stock 392 runs low 12s 4300lbs stock and only 50hp more so yeah it runs good.I can run 22psi in my gt500 and run 8s all day.

[@BananerRepublic]

8's all day? sure buddy, sure. Just like a stock 2013 392 runs low 12's (it doesn't, car and driver tested it at 12.9, and this is published in their article online)

[@svt89]

@@BananerRepublic day late and a dollar short ain’t you ?

[@BananerRepublic]

@@svt89 idc if you made the comment 30 years ago. its still exists for everyone to read and its still as dumb now as it was 10 years ago

[@svt89]

@@BananerRepublic this coming from a guy with no vids 😂. Yes 22 psi of boost will get a GT500 In the 8s

[@halo3pownage]

OK and if I put a stage 2 twin turbos on my 370z and push 22psi I'll run low 10s all day long. That's not the point if the challenger weighed like 500lbs lighter it would be a 11s car stock but because it weighs so much, its slower than the competition. Take a V6 challenger. If it weighed 3000lbs it probably would be faster than a z but because it weighs 4000lbs its going to be significantly slower. Again the challenger isn't a bad car and tbh I want one but it just a tank

[@CarandRacer]

(Sigh)...I know every man comes from different circumstances - but I wonder whether this 19 year old kid will appreciate what he has? The good news for the everyday Joe is that the GTR's are getting more attainable and modding them could not be easier. Before I was sponsored by Switzer I had their entry-level kit - the P600 (tune and exhaust) and ran a 10.8 at 130 MPH. Cost me 4K. I was lucky to make videos and get noticed. 1 year later - I have the R1K and have enjoyed every minute.

[@svt89]

6.4 hemi runs low 12s all day even the new 5.7 hemi can run low 13s.And thats carrying 4000lbs.If your ganna buy a 6cyl buy a real like a inline 6 335i aleast it can get into the 12s lol.

[@svt89]

Top of the line car is a viper in my book that rapes anything ford or gm has.

[@Hondacbr600rrish]

Bruuuuuuh! Lol. I seen fbo run high 5's Lol.

[@CarandRacer]

Lol...this video of not my car - with a build that isn't mine - but with numbers I understand because I race - has been a ton of fun to manage.

[@Hondacbr600rrish]

Right now fbo with z1 headers art pipes and motordyne exhaust with Cai and suspension is rebuilt with z1 motorsports diff brace, with everything else that makes it stiff lol. I ran a 12.8 without e-85.

[@CarandRacer]

@@Hondacbr600rrish Those are solid ET - at what MPH?

[@halo3pownage]

Ford gt and the z07 corvette are faster than the viper. Plus those arnt muscle cars. Those are american sports cars. A muscle car would be a charger, challenger, camaro, mustang, gto, ect.

[@CarandRacer]

Very cool. You obviously have alot of experience with the SRT6. I don't own the above car so I don't know. I'm a GTR guy, currently driving a Switzer R1K set up (videos on this channel). So I'm not a VQ guy either (although I leased a G37S before) but a VR38DETT guy.;) Cheers and thanks again for Watching!

[@MrPrplhaze1]

"This isn't my car, it must be supercharged because it hit 110!" "Oh and I shall call it "Stillen supercharged"...mmm yea, sounds good.

[@CarandRacer]

Lol...this post just keeps on giving. That is correct. I was there, I filmed it, I spoke with the owner, and stock G37's cannot hit 110 MPH stock and aren't FI - so simple bolt ons wouldn't do it. It's a racing experience thing - and I recognize not everyone has that experience. I hope that helps.

[@svt89]

@MsVinny32 That was a bad time for the srt8 it should run a 13-13.3 stock.Even supcharged the G37 should lose.The new 392 hemi would of walked this.

[@aureliomontoya8197]

13.74 is not supercharged lol i got a 13.4 in my altima SER with bolt ons lol

[@CarandRacer]

Besides the fact you can hear the SC in the video, his MPH shows what the car is capable of. You weren't laying down 110 MPH in your Altima. Test and tune days - zero prep - RWD - and all kinds of crappy ET will come from that. ET is traction.

[@aureliomontoya8197]

CarandRacer Dont tell me what i got and what i didnt get, my ser was fully bolt ons and tuned with 3inch piping and a bigger throttle body. Ive gotten 13.7s 13.6s my best time was 13.4 and it was stripped down no back seats or panels. YOU DEF CANT HEAR NO SC on that G. Lol plus the fact that i own a 2010 G37s coupe and know wtf it sounds like and ive gone to the 1/4 twice in the G and got 13.8 and 13.7 as my times. So lets say he did have a SC he should of gotten a way better time, or needs a driver mod asap 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@aureliomontoya8197]

Not to mention my G is stock.

[@CarandRacer]

@@aureliomontoya8197 I will tell you that you didn't trap 110+ MPH. Especially with your stock G37 (102 to maybe 104 depending on your DA). Having raced for a goodly amount of time, I know what to look for to see what a cars potential is - versus the ET (which - again - is based mostly on traction). He also ran 112 MPH on another pass. That trap is a high 12 second pass with some traction. Does he need a driver mod? Likely. Not my car - so it isn't worth arguing over for me.

[@aureliomontoya8197]

CarandRacer Im sorry man if you think its SC and youve been *fairly racing* for a while. I know what times ive gotten and yes its not worth arguing. But this G isnt SC. Unless this track has the highest altitude in the world for a SC G to run stock times lol

[@MsVinny32]

OK but put it up against a supercharged challenger srt 8

[@feeshi6969]

V8 isn’t it what do u expect mf

[@ganymede3141]

Those are stock 1/4 mile numbers. Nice try. 😂

[@CarandRacer]

Sigh...not my car - but I am interested in stock G37s running 110-112 MPH in the 1/4...from your "experience" I mean...lol.

[@ganymede3141]

@@CarandRacer I know it's not your car, and I know that this video was uploaded a long time ago, so appreciate your response. However, in 2008, Motor Trend tested the stock G37 in the 1/4 mile, and it got 13.5 sec at 105mph. A simple Google search will reveal that. The one in this video put down a similar time, and 5 additional mph at the top end is in the noise. A slight tail-wind, a better prepped surface or better tires can make that difference. Point is, with a Stillen supercharger, which bumps power output by at least 100HP depending on the tune, expectation would be high 12s and about 115-120. The car in this video might have cat-back, aftermarket intakes and such, but it sure as hell isn't supercharged. If it is, then it's a terrible install and tune, because it gets the same 1/4 mile time as stock and only a few mph higher trap speed, which, again, can be explained with variability factors. ✌️

[@CarandRacer]

No @@ganymede3141- 5-7 MPH on an NA car is not in the noise. That is a lot of MPH, especially for a low HP/torque car. I had a NA G37S as a daily and I can tell you they run 13.9-14.2 at 102-104 MPH on average. 110-112 MPH is no where close to stock - even on a unicorn DA racing day. Expectation is the problem - this guy built the car himself and it had a Stillen canned tune. That is a recipe for disaster if everything isn't up to spec. ET - is mostly traction - that is why I don't look at it as my first indicator. I look at MPH - which is what the car is capable of. As an example; someone in the Corvette world was trying to say they beat a stock car world record - and they did from an ET standpoint. But when I looked at their MPH - they were about 8-10 MPH above stock average - which is way too high to explain with super cool DA conditions. It was in fact - a tuned car. A few MPH on an NA car at this level is 1-2 MPH. These are not FI cars - and even those at this power level will only fluctuate 2-4 at the most. 8-10 MPH fluctuation would take a pretty big build - on a night and day different DA - like July heat wave and October negative DA. That is how big 8-10 MPH is on average (as all of his runs were 110-112 MPH).

[@ganymede3141]

@@CarandRacer Funny how 330 HP is (low HP/torque). In the '80s that was supercar territory. 😂 But a good 20 mph tail-wind can easily give an extra 5mph trap speed by reducing top end drag, which is proportional to the square of the air velocity. And if 5mph and same 1/4 time as stock is the best that the Stillen supercharger can do, that's pathetic and weak AF. Stock Stillen tune is worthless (as evidenced by this video, assuming it has one, and not just some cat-back or other such mods).

[@CarandRacer]

No @@ganymede3141...this is the difference between reading the internet and trying to quote math and actual racing experience. 330 HP and 270 lb feet is not supercar territory in the 80's or especially now - which is why it is difficult to have discussions with people who don't have much actual track experience. For example a 20 MPH tailwind is not providing 5 MPH to someone's trap speed - like it is a constant bonus number anyone gets regardless of how fast the car is lol. The G37S weighed about 3800 lbs - that is not a light car. It was peppy-ish, but it is not a 13.5's consistent car. And it definitely is not a 110-112 MPH trapping car - which is how we know the car was modified. How well it was modified and tuned is another discussion. And has nothing to do with how good or bad the product is.

[@tyronenosworthy1874]

Lmao my Ford fiesta ran 13.4

[@CarandRacer]

Lol - not stock it didn't.

[@XfireBlake]

Or just buy a stock supercharged SRT 6 like the one I'm selling and run 12.1's @114 on stock tires;)

[@tokahontas9990]

Doubt that’s supercharged, N/A g37’s can hit 60 in 4 seconds absolute flat. Boosted one making 500+ hp, which would’ve ripped that challenger way harder

[@CarandRacer]

Lol on the "technical" racing-speak...4 seconds absolute flat...ripped that Challenger. How about the MPH? 110? He ran 112 MPH as well. So many posts from so many people who do not race.

[@SportsMusicCars]

no stock g37 is hitting 60 in 4 flat. not even 5 flat

[@ayden6348]

damn my n/a lexus is350 does better than that

[@CarandRacer]

Lol...not stock it doesn't...

[@ayden6348]

@@CarandRacer that’s why I said n/a Lmfaoo

[@CarandRacer]

@@ayden6348 Ummm...NA means naturally aspirated...you are not beating that car stock. And especially NA.

[@ayden6348]

@@CarandRacer I’m not stock bro that’s why I said n/a not stock, I’m fbo lmfao

[@ayden6348]

Yeah no shit I’m not beating a supercharged g37 in a stock Lexus…

[@marvinnunez3197]

G37s isn't a good car that challenger got more wheels spin so the g37s had time to take off

[@iLive27]

DOZE EZOD that G37s is a much better car than that bull crap ass Mustang on your profile.

[@marvinnunez3197]

Rozay601 you should know your cars first import are Hondas and infiniti and shit like thag muscle pulls all that weight import can't pull because they weak ass hell and that a shelby gt350 get you cars right bitch ass

[@CarandRacer]

Lol...I have videos with 1900 HP cars on my channel and this video gets so much attention. I know it's a part of the fun with cars - but the truth is there's no magic; power, weight and traction. Whoever has this in the best combo - driver being equal - wins. There's no magic - or "better car".

[@mikeoxlong6351]

CarandRacer leave the kid alone, he wants to be just like his daddy back in the 80s with his shitty ass American muscle.

[@AM-wi6zo]

DOZE EZOD G37 is a great car wtf are you talking about

[@zayloe999]

i thought that said stolen