Stryker : Opportunity or Threat ?

[@sibsankarbanerjee1244]

Absolutely correct, only saying ATMANIRBHAR BHARAT is not enough, it has to be practically deployed when ever such situations arises.

[@gvincent3246]

Our policy makers should trust Indigenous systems and give opportunity to Tata and Mahendra. Even L&T and Bharat Forge are making wheeled variants. And our Tata Kestrel costs around 21-22 cr per vehicle. But why to buy US stryker if Indigenous options are readily available 🤦🏽😭😭

[@subramaniams6091]

India should not compromise its identity

[@prashanthb6521]

Thanks for English version.

[@ajaymsingh]

Very rightly said Subodh ji. The focus should always be indigenisation. 🇮🇳🚩🇮🇳

[@le_ecrivaine]

ajaymsingh: Those who have chosen not to be part of the Indian armed forces really have no say in this. What if officers of the Indian armed forces started advising you on how to ‘efficiently’ run your household?? 🤔 (There would be several thousands who are better qualified and earn more than you.)

[@JoyP09]

Completely agree with you regarding the demerits of going for foreign systems when we have indigenous systems.

[@sudhansurana7677]

When similar platform is available it is waste of precious indian money in procuring foreign platforms

[@harivemuru1408]

Armed forces should not be given freedom to select the weapons as they take decades to test and decide the same. Government should take the decision which is best.

[@ranabirsarkar6750]

The process of indigenous development of various weapons system should be given top priority. The Indian firms in collaboration with DRDO are quite capable of manufacturing a vehicle like Stryker. What India should ask from USA is transfer of critical technology for development of engine for our AMCA programme.

[@le_ecrivaine]

Two points: ➀ the Stryker variant being considered is the air defence variant, which isn't being made locally - not the 𝘮𝘢𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘪 APC ➁ if the Indian Army opts for the Stryker, it will be built jointly. So, Mahindra Defence, Tatas or Bharat Forge will be involved.

[@dlypgogoi4453]

I failed to understand one thing, why Indian arms manufacturers thinks that their products are inferior to American products???

[@Kem____paalty16]

They don't think it's the lobbying men in uniform not all but certain who does that and can't call them anything bcoz they earned the uniform. Tell me is mahindra ipmv inferior to styker. Styker is hated by even american troops. It seems very simple these days that, earlier russia had deep presence in MOD and now its america. And MoD is the one to ruin both defense psu and private players. One day they suddenly wake up ask for tank which can fly

[@JUPITER69966]

Because they are. 🗿

[@Shirish255]

If PANNU blackmail is THREAT ?

[@amarjeetbadhani3616]

JAI HIND 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

[@p.s.mukherjee7536]

Some decisions are being taken to appease America for purely political reasons. Points raised by you are very logical and the government of India knows it.

[@le_ecrivaine]

@p.s.mukherjee: Shouldn't someone as knowledgeable as you be among one of India's billionaires?? 🤔

[@science-is-fun]

100 % agree

[@science-is-fun]

Every rupee invest in defence resurech is not burden it's going to the economic it's self By importing technology And call it as make in india is like jf 17 is Pakistani made fighters 😂 Like In case of tapas if initial model are exepted and then gradually increase it's capacity and induce will be right Choice but we will go with so called make in inda products

[@sswayamprakash]

Weapons and platforms like these for which we have indigenous alternatives should be listed in the negative import list.

[@KnowledgeEnthusiast]

🤬👎 Prioritising imported Foreign Product purchases which are indigenously available is an extremely disappointing depressing & unacceptable because it'll definitely become a major responsible factor behind losing interest in defence products development by Indian private defence manufacturing companies.

[@abhiksarkar3829]

India doesn't need striker,we have very good armoured vehicles like tata kestral & mahindra mwap,besides our armoured vehicles were performing really good in combat zone in Kashmir where pakisthani terrorists are attacking frequently right now,it's not our gvt ,importing foreign weapons unnecessarily is becoming a irresistible obsession for our armed forces & air force officials,our Indian navy had supported mostly atmanirbhar bharat just like our gvt

[@tktechbytanmoy9347]

IA only preference is Foreign system

[@arunkumarts8279]

Please reduce the pace of audio as it is not clear at some places.

[@Hanikarak_Bapu]

I think its no harm to buy the strykers as we need more than 2000 armoured vehicles to replace the ageing BMPs and we are buying just 300- 350. So the rest can be fulfilled by tata kestrel, Mahindra CBRN etc.

[@milindchipde4175]

भारत अमेरिका के साथ टेक्नोलॉजी ट्रांसफ़र होते हुवे आग़े बढ़ रहा है, इससे HighTech अपडेशन होगा और इस स्टैण्डर्ड से ही भारत की शुरूआत होगी, इससे आज की टेक आज मिलती रहेगी और आगे हम updation करते रहेंगे🕉️❤️🙏🏻

[@blackmamba3427]

Focus on Made In India ❤

[@anilmishra5383]

Yes I agree with you...To bog down Indian export potential and demoralise Indian Private manufacturer US shrewdly pressurising Indian Govt for joint production of Striker vehicle. In their perspective monetarily it is insignificant but psychological defeat is larger in world arms trade.

[@TheGrimStoic]

any kind of military dependence on USA will be to India's detriment - Case in point - F404

[@Amitpariyar42]

We need both, aatma nirbhar Bharat and collaboration with multiple partners. If you only give orders to domestic companies, they'll be lazy to give you more bang for buck and if they feel there's still companies who'll give them good competition, they'll up their game to do the better. At the end of the day it's army who'll get best equipments and govt will spend less in the long run. Before it was Soviet union and Russia, now it's a USA and France. It's no shame that we want the best machines for our Army. If our domestic companies give the same quality products at leas cost, we'll surely gonna buy it. Of not then we need to buy something else from outside. It's a clever move. Govt is trying their best to get the tot and by collaboration it'll happen. Army will get the experience of foreign weapons and they can even induct similar tech for next genIndian made weapons. Aatmanirbhar Bharat is not a lne day dream. It'll take 10-15 years minimum. After 2035-2040 we Will see the results. Till then just grow your money. Work hard and wish for the best 😅

[@Mrashisharora]

It's a threat since it is politically motivated.

[@mtrest4]

Babuz are wasting the US time making them present the Stryker when there is no intention of purchasing it.

[@aruunmenon]

Someone should tag Rahul baba on this. That will scuttle this for sure.

[@jeevanmishra4585]

you have already made video regarding this topic why crunchy more out of such a fibble topic...we know why army do such things...they are no fools...if they are then what can we do?

[@VermaRajinder]

A few Stryker platforms would not be a bad idea --- More to understand is capabilities and understand the development challenges. Buy atleast a brigade worth for the Northern Sector !!!

[@anuragsood7997]

It makes no sense. Having a few will require us to also keep maintenance and overhaul arrangements which will increase the logistics cost. The bottom line is that the USA is not a reliable defence partner.. India needs to be self reliant and that doesn't happen immediately.. our domestic manufacturers need to have small victories (via domestic sales) if we were to EVER put out our defence products in the international market. Stryker maybe a top-of-the-shelf product, but India needs numbers to counter China just as it needs quality.. only way forward is indigenous way

[@VermaRajinder]

@@anuragsood7997 .... Only once one has driven or used a high end product does understand what is possible ..... Buy a few days 200 as an Experience for better R&D !!! Cost is not/ cannot always be the only factor !!!

[@Ie9tyo7doz]

Hindi

[@anuragsood7997]

This is their English channel dude. It's like walking upto McDonald's and asking for daliya.😂😅

[@Ie9tyo7doz]

@@anuragsood7997 😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏

[@chakrabortyengineers975]

Stryker is not a major technological advancement for India. Tata and Kalyani & Mahindra have much better product.

[@Aaditya_electro]

Why don't you make a video on Russian tanks are a threat

[@anshude5293]

Is the Stryker operating in Ukraine? If yes how many destroyed or captured by russia. The worse the performance of the system, the more Americans will want India to produce and procure it. To be friends of America is fatal.

[@vink1459]

Defense channels promote foreign mall then outrage.

[@AlphaDefense]

lol no one promoted it here instead we called it off

[@mayank866]

The way Jack Sullivan sitting in front PM Modi, it looks like Sullivan was sent to pressurize Modi ji in the matter of Pannun. In the same transaction US want to sell its stryker

[@saurabhdang7307]

It is not made in india , it is copy paste india 😂😢.

[@Mikey14742]

where tf is opposition Indi alliance? they should raise this issue. India got a strong opposition but this strong opposition does not oppose BJP it opposes India

[@aruunmenon]

First