Roy Taylor: Nutritional management and prevention of type 2 diabetes

[@ketaninlit]

This man is pure genius.... Kudos to explain things so simply...

[@ImranKhan-pk5zq]

Dr Roy tailor is true legend and deserve for nobel prize also dr jason fung deserve nobel prize, these two doctors has change the whole world with their experiments. Hats off. They are saving the lives of thousands of the people.

[@hanshans4118]

and Dr. Sten Ekberg

[@ishanchaturvedi2]

@@hanshans4118 Everyone should get Nobel.

[@yesiownfrodo]

Dr Tailor is great, but Jason Fung is a HACK. Go on youtube, find his videos before he became famous, where he is making fun of fat people. I can't respect that. To each their own, but such unprofessional behavior should not be tolerated.

[@JaneFrost-v3c]

He should be knighted by King Charles.

[@yesiownfrodo]

I enjoyed this very much. I would like to say that in the USA, Optifast by Nestle is $150-175 a WEEK. That's a lot more than what is said by the proponents of the low calorie packet shakes that we used in Newcastle.

[@yosefsugi1808]

thanks prof taylor ❤❤❤❤❤

[@pluki1357]

Thank you for this great video! Would it be possible to allow for creation of subtitles in other languages? There are many people - especially of older generation - who do not speak English, yet they could greatly benefit from watching this. I believe it is simply a matter of settings, quick and easy to apply, so that subtitles in other languages could be created by any volunteering person (subject to your approval before actually visible under the video).

[@drgoldhealthcare]

Thanks for sharing your insights about Diabetes. Nothing has been mentioned about muscle insulin resistance. Sir do you mean in the phase of high insulin there is a shift towards DNL favoring fatty liver? Can you elaborate on that?

[@Mark4Jesus]

Amazing results. But... just tell me what do I need to do?

[@JohnCorrUK]

My take, go on the 900 calorie per day diet up to 8 weeks or your blood sugar normalise s. Ordering my food packs today ... I am both fit rhr of 49 and BMI of 22 ... Going to test the 'personal fat threshold' hypothesis for myself

[@trotskyite1]

Lose enough fat to rid yourself of type 2 diabetes. That's the take away

[@Mark4Jesus]

@@JohnCorrUK I did his caloric reduction and lost a lot of weight for and it stayed off for a long time (at least a couple months) even after I fell off the wagon and restarted eating with reckless abandon.

[@Mark4Jesus]

Oh and I saw AM blood sugar come down a lot too, I was at the low end of pre-diabetic then dropped well into the safe zone. I need to do it again.

[@chazwyman8951]

@@Mark4Jesus Until you figure out that it is the carbs that is driving your T2D and not being fat, not eating fat, and not eating protein. A High fat low carb diet is satiating, and sustainable. Calorie restriction alone always fails since your body slows down the metabolism and you end up tired and hungry. You need to be a fat burner.

[@rajeshtanwar2445]

Wow!!! Doctor Roy Taylor Sir; you are doing a great service to the humanity, especially the large number of people suffering from diabetes type II. Your research is in-depth covering various aspects of diabetes type II and it's remission and possibly reversal...❤🎉❤🎉

[@Davida121986]

Can this diet be performed by skinny type 2s?

[@LoboLynx]

My take is yes. It's the intra-abdominal fat (vs subQ) that we need to worry about most. Have you heard of TOFI? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOFI

[@SuzanneU]

This is my spouse's situation - BMI of 23, prediabetic with only 3 blood sugar points to go until he's officially T2. He has horrendous family history, and it's on both sides though more pronounced on his father's. His father and all his father's sibs died of diabetic complications. We've started Michael Mosley's 5:2 intermittent fasting programme. After only 2 cycles, my spouse has lost 2" off his waist; as he's lost only 2lb, I think this is likely to be visceral fat and not water weight. He'll request another HgbA1C test in 3 months. In the meantime, I'm looking into getting a DXA scan for both of us, so we can see where problem fat lies.

[@nonfictionone]

What diet exactly do you mean - if you could summarise this talk in one sentence it seems to be ‘eat less’?…

[@trotskyite1]

@@nonfictionone t2d is caused by excess calories over time. T2d is put in remission by fat loss to your own personal fat threshold. It may be easier to starve over a short period than try and lose slowly because ketosis blunts appetite

[@ishanchaturvedi2]

@@SuzanneU I am pre-diabetic with BMI of 20.5.

[@sorrykay3450]

Since that time Rod Taylor has come round to accepting the efficacy of a high-fat diet. Saturated fat is fine as long as it's quality stuff. Think ketogenic

[@jameshunt7884]

Top effort mate me from new Zealand

[@talalalwisabi8893]

Intermitting fasting and low to very low carb diet are the only way to reverse diabetes, basically, no snacks, no low-fat food. Low carb food should be a lifestyle, not just diet. We have been misled by the evidence and the formal dietary advice. For the healthy person in order to avoid metabolic syndrome, need to eat balanced food, containing the same amount of carbs, protein and fat including saturated fat, it means carbs around 33%. For diabetic, the best to reduce carbs under 100 hundred or around fifty. Long-term very low carb is durable and very safe. I would recommend Dr Jason Fung lectures as well.

[@viktorpecs]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/oaW0q4BofqZgp7c

[@chazwyman8951]

That is how I did it last year. 45lbs down, breathing better, no more heart pain, all blood markers in the right direction. The only thing you do not need is carbohydrate since the body knows how to make exactly the right amount of blood sugar you need from fatty acids and proteins. Some people can thrive on meat alone.

[@DennisNowland]

According to Roy Taylor, if you've got type two diabetes, you'll need to lose body fat, but if you're already slim and underweight and you develop type two diabetes if you then put yourself on a low calorie diet would you not become emaciated. Just a bit confused, that's all.

[@JWB671]

He basically says you can’t get type two unless you are over fat for your body. Problem for some people is that they only need to gain very little fat for this to happen. They look slim and aren’t overweight as such but they still have reached their own personal fat threshold and become diabetic. This is why places like China and India barely had any diabetes until the past 50 years when their calorie intake went up somewhat and their population became more sedentary. They didn’t get enormous like people in the USA for example but they got fat enough for their bodies to become diabetic.

[@gauravdesale9552]

Another reason a person might be underweight and also have type 2 diabetes is because they could have little to no lean muscle mass and high amounts of visceral fat. This in turn would place them in an underweight category even though they are carrying too much fat for their bodies.

[@chazwyman8951]

He's not all there. It's the carbs!!

[@trotskyite1]

​@@chazwyman8951 ridiculous comment

[@chazwyman8951]

@@trotskyite1 No one more absurd and stupid than a 21stC Trotskyite. Look out for those icepicks buddy.

[@desidesigning]

I was eating a toast with Lurpak and coffee ☕️ and this popped up!

[@richardfeinman6581]

It is good to hear appropriate strategy: in science, if you have a hypothesis, you have to try to destroy it. The statement “people only develop type 2 diabetes if they have been in positive calorie balance" would, in my view, bear on that. I thought people who are thin can also have type 2. I know a few myself. Also, the starting assumption is that all calorie balance is the same, but there is a lot of science questioning that. No? In any case, if you destroy a hypothesis, it is dead but if you don't destroy it -- especially if you sure you can't destroy it -- then all you have shown is consistency with your hypothesis and you have to consider alternatives that may be more precise or more effective and you then have to destroy those if you want your own hypothesis to stay alive. For example, you now have to show that the effect of the reduction in calories is not due to a de facto reduction in carbohydrate. After all, low carbohydrate diets almost always outperform isocaloric higher carbohydrate diets for weight loss. It is also important to understand that the hypothesis -- about origins of diabetes -- was not tested. The ability to treat diabetes was not tested. And, on that, ketogenic diets will do better than anything else. Remember, Taylor's results are in the ball park of 50 %. Hallberg (e.g doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0373-9) does way better than that . (Although Hallberg considers that Dr. Taylor's is one of the three methods -- surgery and the ketogenic diet are the other two -- for putting diabetes in remission). We don't know what causes diabetes but we do know that it presents as carbohydrate intolerance and almost every drug targets blood glucose, just like low-carbohydrate/ketogenic diets but when it comes to diet, establishment medicine says lose weight. Which brings us to the missing piece. Dr. Taylor doesn't mention what his protocol is for losing weight.

[@LoboLynx]

My understanding is that at 12 months the DiRECT trial had more people in remission than Virta's data; however, the definition's of remission were slightly different. I am concerned about the keto craze on a population level b/c I think people will take it as license to eat all the NY strips, bacon, and sausage they want. The Virta/Hallberg data demonstrate that people also lose a significant amount of weight on the order of 10% of body weight. We also know that some low-carb diets can allow you to naturally restrict your caloric intake. Virta/Hallberg didn't report caloric intake from what I've seen though perhaps I am missing something. Taken together, Virta/Hallberg's outcomes could simply be a result of calorie restriction and the resultant weight loss. Perhaps there is nothing special about ketosis in diabetes. What do you think, Richard?

[@trotskyite1]

Have you got shares in virta?

[@jameshunt7884]

Why dose your ldl level cholesterol go up when u cut out carbs.lost 15 kgs down to 70 kgs now any one help plz

[@ishanchaturvedi2]

When you cut carbs, you substitute it with something else. That substitution often has some saturated fat in it (even Avocados). So that is why the the LDL cholesterol goes up.

[@jameshunt7884]

Thanks very for your reply

[@olayemiolawoyin2386]

I don’t know what I would have done without your help. Thank you so much for curing my diabetes’s with your herbs Dr Igudia.

[@vimalkirti4845]

Mastering Diabetes - no fat/oil/animal food

[@gauravdesale9552]

Ok I'll eat 0 grams of fat! Let's see how long I survive! Thank you Mastering Diabetes for your infinite wisdom. 🙏

[@chazwyman8951]

@@gauravdesale9552 Yeah you will die.

[@chazwyman8951]

I reversed by diabetes by massively increasing meat, fish, eggs, and dairy. All I had to to was stop the refined carbs, root vegetables, wheat based products and anything with sugar. The satiation that gave me enabled me to do intermittent fasting too. I lost 45 lbs in 8 months, reverse NAFLD, reversed T2D, and improved blood markers. There are a range of health benefits I could list, including no more heart pain.

[@chazwyman8951]

Thin people miss the point again and again. His interpretation ignores the person. He looks like he ought to be hungry but I doubt he ever is. It's all very well having a short term calorie deficit, and it is all very well being part of a study that keeps you on track but you really need to understand why 99% of all calorie restrictive diets fail and people put all the weight back on to face yo-yo dieting for the rest of their lives. What you need to understand is the cycle of satiation and hunger; what happens to these when you restrict calories. And what is sustainable is high fat low carb because that gives maximal satiation enabling intermittent fasting and body fat burning. Sugar is the real criminal here, refined carbs are next. Refined foods have high impact on blood sugar and insulin cycles. Table sugar is 50% fructose which can only be turned into liver fat. Table sugar is added to everything to replace the bad low fat advice.

[@reason3581]

You don’t have to go low carb to avoid (added) sugar and refined carbs.

[@chazwyman8951]

@@reason3581 😜 Good luck with that.

[@reason3581]

@@chazwyman8951 It’s not rocket science. Fruits veggies whole grains beans lentils peas nuts seeds herbs spices, olive oil, fish.

[@chazwyman8951]

@@reason3581 What do they feed lifestock to fatten them up? Grains. What makes hibernating animals fat for the winter? Fruit. Aside from that I'd recommend the other stuff on your list avoidng to much carbohydrate and get some quality meat inside you so you don't go hungry.

[@reason3581]

@@chazwyman8951 well, I’m not a bear or a cow. I prefer to look at studies on humans. And they do not support your claims. It’s obvious that it’s the ultraprocessed foods that make us fat -not whole plant foods.