Tamron SP 150-600mm G2 Final Review | Part 2

Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DI VC USD G2 Final Review | Part 2: Image Quality and AF Performance Upgrades. In this second part of the full review of the new Tamron 150-600 G2, Photographer Dustin Abbott breaks down how Tamron has addressed the optical and autofocus shortcomings from the first version of the lens in the G2 version. Get your questions answered here in the full text review: bit.ly/2eOHgmE | See the image gallery here: bit.ly/2dU7diG | Purchase the Lens Here: bhpho.to/2eeKZeG | You can look at the Cotton Carrier here: www.cottoncarrier.com
Want to support this channel? Use these affiliate links to shop at:
B&H Photo: bhpho.to/1TA0Xge
Amazon: www.amazon.com...
Ebay: bit.ly/DustineBay
Make a donation via Paypal: paypal.me/dustinTWI
Get a discount off all Skylum Editing Software (Luminar, Aurora HDR, AirMagic) by using code DUSTINHDR at checkout: bit.ly/LuminarDLA
Become a Patron: / dustinabbott | Check me out on: Personal Website: dustinabbott.net/ | Sign up for my Newsletter: bit.ly/1RHvUNp | Instagram: bit.ly/DLAinsta | Google+: bit.ly/24PjMzv | Facebook: on. 1nuUUeH | Twitter: bit.ly/1RyYxIH | Flickr: bit.ly/1UcnC0B | 500px: bit.ly/1Sy2Ngu
My filming setup: Sony a7R III: B&H Photo: bhpho.to/2D6ibNO or Amazon: amzn.to/2CNxOvH | or | Sony a9 @ B&H Photo: bhpho.to/2HyWIyt or Amazon: amzn.to/2s1vYE0
Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 RXD @B&H Photo: bhpho.to/2FA00la or Amazon amzn.to/2G2kaEr
Lights: Rotolight AEOS @B&H Photo bhpho.to/2IK7mqV | Genaray Contender @B&H Photo: bhpho.to/33HbGNM | and Aputure AL-MW: bhpho.to/2N3MtZV
DISCLAIMER: This video and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

[@rohanjoglekar6397]

Thanks Dustin for helping me...Finally bought a tamron 150-600 G2 today..nice performance and image quality...also the focussing is fast..just what i wanted..Thanks for the help again

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's a very nice upgrade!

[@scarmenl]

Thank you. Life stopped me from getting the version one but things are getting a little better so I think I see a version two in my future. Thanks for the reviews.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad to help out...and glad to hear that life is improving!

[@andIloveH]

Thanks for the review. I just played with the Tamron G2 and Nikkor 200-500 today at our local camera shop and liked them both. I took a few shots and felt that the image quality and AF were very pleasing. However the weight of the nikkor really puts me off. Your review really swing my decision to the G2. I will get it as budget allows.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Van Hung Le Weight is certainly a factor with these lenses

[@tomlee812]

I have had the "G1" since release in the Uk and use it on a Nikon D810. Having calibrated that with focal I'm really happy with the images I get, although you do need good light to get it performing at it's peak. Given the price point against the proprietary lenses I think it's fabulous value for money, especially at it's current price point. I really enjoyed your detailed analysis here and, for the moment at least, I'm sticking with the "G1". Sometimes you have to use what you have, after all, it's the photographer who takes the picture, not the lens. Thank you for another really good review.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You are absolutely right, Tom. I didn't move my own G1 in favor of the Canon 100-400L II because I was disappointed with the image quality at all. I liked the form factor of the 100-400L better and found that I wasn't often shooting long telephoto shots and didn't often miss the extra reach.

[@samuelserubiri9390]

I always love your reviews. Very helpful to me. Helped me choose the Tamron 150-600G2

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Great to hear!

[@Athiril]

In regards to short focus softness perhaps using a short extension tube to bring the focus closer while the lens' focus mechanism is set to a farther distance may improve things for that usage.

[@ahmedawad563]

Effort much appreciated. I enjoyed both parts.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thanks - glad to hear it!

[@alandeidrejones9422]

Thanks Mate (i'm from NZ !!) for a good rundown on the G2 ..i recently bought a G2 and sold my G1 i loved the G1 on my 7D2 and mine was a good very sharp copy and pretty sharp at 600 too (960MM) the main reason i got a G2 was i splashed out on a 5DIV so wanted the improvement for the 5DIV as every little improvement helps with 30 Mpx !! the G2 has slightly better colour, contrast and sharpness its not night and day but the improvment in IQ is there, i think more noticable on the 5DIV than the 7DII .My wife uses a Canon 100-400MK2 with her 7D2 so ive tried them both out on both 7dII and 5DIV i have seen quite a few say than the 100-400MkII with a 1.4tc mk3 outperforms the G2 i personally have not found this ! at 400mm yes the 100-400 II is a little better than the GI and G2 (and so it should be..its a great lens and costs a lot more !) but the Canon at 560mm(with 1.4T/c) compared to the G2 at 600 i still feel the G2 has a very very slight edge on both 7D2 and 5DIV (which in fact says a lot for the 100-400MKII with the 1.4T/c mk3 as its nothing short of excellent with the 1.4t/c ie very little loss of sharpness ) when i want 600 i will use the G2 !! up to 400 i would i flog my wifes 100-400 MK2 when shes not looking if i didnt have my 70-200 F2.8 MK2 with me !! thats my 2 cents worth !! blessings everyone Alan

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I'll directly compare those two in my next go-around. The difference may not be huge between the G1 and the G2, but just a little improvement makes it one of the best.

[@alandeidrejones9422]

I agree and thats why i upgraded without hesitation !! by the way i can handhold the G1 and G2 at 960mm on 7D2 with VC on quite satisfactorily mind you ive been a rifle shooter for 45 years that thats helps in squeezing of the shot at the right moment !!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Alan Deidre Jones Excellent!

[@ryangallagher3235]

Hi Alan, on the 7d MK II can you use all autofocus points when zoomed all the way in? I know that all AF points are available on f5.6 lenses, and only the center point on f8 lenses (like when using a teleconverter with the Canon 100-400mm f4-5.6). I'm having trouble finding clear information about what happens in between that range though like this lens where it is max f6.3 at the long end. Thanks for any info you can provide!

[@ajh5124]

Great review as always, Dustin! My G2 arrives tomorrow, 11/1/20. Excited to marry this new lens with my Nikon D500. I’ll let you know my thoughts after having an opportunity to use in the field. I am an amateur photographer who enjoys photography as a hobby and for relaxation benefit. Stay safe and well my neighbor to the North!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Enjoy!

[@ajh5124]

@@DustinAbbottTWI www.flickr.com/gp/ajh2009/qK5382

[@chrisannevogt1544]

in 1 you quickly showed charts where can they be found. great videos

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you

[@mykelphotography]

Fabulous review again Dustin, thank you very much for your time and effort in doing these reviews, top effort once more.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you

[@jairocruz-rua9079]

Great review! Really appreciate all the info you crammed into both videos. You are helping me make up my mind. Thanks Dustin!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad to help out. I'm about to take a second look at the lens and test it on APS-C along with the new Teleconverters.

[@jairocruz-rua9079]

I look forward to that review also! I ordered this lens today without the teleconverter. I did get the tap in console with it.

[@PrestigePhotog]

Well done Abbott! Looking to purchase this lens..

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Enjoy!

[@Powerstroke98]

I quite like the professionalism of you video's Dustin! Great job, and thanks for posting these video's. I too am a Nikon shooter, but suspect all you've shown would be similar especially with the many full frame Nikon's as well.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's true!

[@arutemu7329]

Awesome review Dustin, thank you! I really enjoy your presentations on lenses. I just got Tamron 150-600mm v.1, so I was curious to see how the G2 performs in comparison. Thank you again!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad to help out.

[@MjBummer]

Too bad you're not a Nikon shooter as I would have liked to see a comparison between this one and the 200-500. ☺️ Anyways, a really nice job as always. Thanx Dustin!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I suspect I'll hear that a lot over the next few weeks :)

[@jaimeduncan6167]

Yes; you will. You should create a gofundme page to get a Nikon D750 and a D500 :) Excellent review.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Jaime Duncan I'd also need a "GoTimeMe" to add a few hours to each day for me :)

[@jaimeduncan6167]

Dustin Abbott Touche, can argue against that :)

[@JanieP53]

Great info! Helps with my decision to purchase one of these babies! Well done too! Thanks a bunch!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad to help out.

[@areguly]

Thank you for another really good review, I very much enjoy your efforts and passion, I hope you feel appreciated...

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Comments like these certainly help :)

[@TMar066]

Wow, the G2 lens is blowing the G1 out of the water. Amazing the improvements in just a couple of years.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Here's hoping that they can do something similar with the 24-70 and 70-200.

[@johnvandenbroek9753]

Thank you for your excellent review Dustin. I have recently sold my Sigma Sports lens and was about to order the 100 to 400 canon lens for my 5d mark 4 body. After seeing your review I am having second thoughts. The Tamron 150-600 G2 has some great features that could work for me.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I think the big question to ask yourself is how many of your shots you are taking over 400mm. The 100-400L II (which I own) is a fantastic lens, but requires an extender to reach past 400mm. Your 5DIV works well with the 100-400L II + Canon 1.4x III combination, though. The G2 has a lot of the features of the Sport but at a much more manageable weight and balance. It's a nice lens. I haven't directly compared the two lenses yet, but will be doing so soon.

[@fotobum1952]

Great comparison Dustin. Although I've Only had my 1st generation for two years now, I think it's about time I trade it in for the new model.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Well, the lens has been out less than three years, so there are going to be a few in your situation for sure!

[@danielthomas7747]

Thank you for this excellent presentation again! I am waiting mine...

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hope you enjoy it!

[@danielthomas7747]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Hope so. I will have it on the 5D Mark IV. Do you have an Instagram account?

[@JaminTaylor]

Thanks for this. I found it very useful. I currently shoot with the version 1 Tamron 150-600 coupled with a Nikon D7200. I have considered upgrading my glass to the Nikkor 200-500mm but this lens looks like it easily competes with that lens for quality.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Another bonus is that it is quite a bit lighter than the 200-500

[@ravigulasekharam862]

Awesome, thank you 😊

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You’re welcome.

[@klackon1]

Top job Dustin: thanks a lot.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you

[@RowhiderRCRacing]

Thanks Dustin, you give me all I wanted in your review. Great job!

[@susy0360]

Thank you for that grear review...as usual! I know you don't test Nikon gear, but it would have been nice to know how it compares to the 200-500 f5.6

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I suspect that some Nikon reviewer will compare the two.

[@HHTV60]

Enjoyed the review. Very useful. Good information. Thanks!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

My pleasure.

[@pbomike]

Great thorough review. It seems like a winner for sure.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I think it will do well for them.

[@corrbox2]

Interesting and informative review. Thank you for your detailed review. 📷 🙏 😆

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad it was helpful!

[@thefarmingguy43]

Awesome review. i pray that your channel gets million subscribers soon

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That would be nice :)

[@alivenesscyclingroadcyclin2673]

Wow, this lens sounds very impressive. Thank you for really shining a light on the quite amazing new Tamron SP lenses. I am very much looking forward to your comparison with the Canon 100 - 400 L II. I wonder, how do these two lenses perform with and without extender and, can it make sense to own both? I'd really like the extra reach here, but can not imagine giving up my 100 - 400 L II. Thanks for another great video and I am very much looking froward to your 5d iv and 16 - 35 2.8 L III review. Enjoy! Greetings from Spain, Dirk

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I really, really like the 100-400L II. We'll see how they compare in a few weeks, but I like the form factor and behavior of the 100-400L II.

[@alivenesscyclingroadcyclin2673]

Yes, i totally agree with you: impossible to give up the 100 - 400 L II! It has superb build quality, amazing optics, can be hand-held all day and the MFD of 975mm also makes it a very nice complement to a macro lens when shooting details like flowers. Something that I did not expect when I first got the 100 - 400 L II. So it can not be a replacement. But, the extra reach would give capabilities that many of us could otherwise never afford. I would love to occasionally do some BIF photography with the Tamron 150 - 600 G2 - possibly even with an extender (does the Canon 1.4 III work with the Tamron?) and on an APC camera (How about the AF points with extender? 80d or 7d II - otherwise the 7d III will most probably be able to focus on all points with f8). Having this possibility on the horizon is exciting! Many regards, Dirk

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Canigou Cycling - Girona & Pyrenees Road Cycling I've asked Tamron to provide me their new 1.4x extender next time, too. I'll try the Canon on there as well.

[@SH1974]

I own the G2 since a few months (use it on a 7D MK1) and I don't regret to buy it. Having in mind that a professional 500mm or 600mm lens costs several times more than the Tamron, the preformance of the Tamron is really on a surprisingly high level. When I compare with my professional Canon 70-200 f/2,8 L IS2 Lens, of corse the contrast is not the same Level (it would have been utopical to expect that) but it's not that far - and it's nice even, so it's not a big deal to add a bit sharpness by Lightroom or Photoshop. I'm really surprised how good this Lens preforms.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's true - the level of image quality these type of lenses provide for the money is pretty exceptional.

[@kamilkp]

I have a Canon 70-300mm f/4-5.6L and I’m wondering about replacing it with this Tamron. How would you compare the image quality of them in the range of focal lengths that they overlap?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The Canon is a bit sharper, but not by any large margin.

[@Explodezor3]

Nice work! Would be great to compare it to Nikon 200-500 too.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I've heard that a few times. Unfortunately I don't shoot Nikon.

[@Explodezor3]

Oh, I see. Thank you for your reply!

[@andrew7a]

would really love one of these lenses, great review.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you. It is a nice option when you want affordable reach.

[@gerardferry3958]

stunning review and brave enough to give an opinion unlike others

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thanks for the feedback.

[@DavidPerrin-l9t]

Have just watched your review of the Tamron G2. About to buy one. Can you tell me if it will work fully correctly on my Sony A57 A mount? Thanks.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I can't really, as I don't have any experience on that platform.

[@lawtonc8900]

Nice review! However the 500mm moon image at 11:33 does look slightly crisper, especially looking at the right side.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Drawing too many conclusions from a moving target like the moon is tough. There are a lot of variables that could affect something like that.

[@gerardferry3958]

now my favourite lens that i prefer to the 70 200 is II and i use it sometimes too much but is now paying for itself due to more unusual pictures, it would be difficult to regret buying this though i have seen positives for the sigma 50 500

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's hard to beat the value of this lens for providing that kind of reach!

[@beltsazardaniel5590]

Great job! But I think darker light transmission is a big problem for me. Because it means a +1stop Exp compensation or ISO. What do you think about that, Dustin? Thanks for this awesome review..

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I don't think it is anywhere near a stop. They wouldn't be able to market it as f/6.3, otherwise. Maybe 1/3rd stop, max.

[@FrankyboyLegend]

At 600mm on my 760D/T6s I get quite a few soft images below 1/800 even at f8. It's only soft for distant objects. There's some occasional backfocusing (unfortunately no microadjustment for the 760D) but I think the main problem is the VC (the viewfinder image seems quite clear). Up to 500mm I get good images even wide open. I like the fact that I can still use f5.6 at around 400mm unlike my previous Sigma 150-500 which would change to f6.3 around 300mm. I think the Tamron is much sharper at the focal lengths of the Sigma which is quite soft even at f8. Do you know where I can get the Tap-In Console in Canada?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The Tap In is definitely what you need, as it won't matter whether your camera can do AFMA anyway. You can get the Tap In here: store.amplis.com/p/tamron-tap-in-console. Use code AMPLIS52016DA to get 5% off

[@FrankyboyLegend]

thanks for the info. It seems the discount code has expired though. What focal lengths can the focus be adjusted for using the Tap In? For the most part the autofocus seems to be fine but today it kept front-focusing on a target 10 meters at 600mm. Maybe the target (a hummingbird) was too small to focus accurately. Using the live view focus seems pretty accurate so I suspect it's my camera's phase detection acting up in certain scenes. Also it seems there's certain focus distances where the lens is softer at 600mm, even using a tripod and manual focus. Another quirk I noticed is that the VC sometimes turns off completely by itself unless I restart my camera.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I've been assured the the coupon code will still work (use the phone if necessary). You may benefit from a firmware update on the lens via the console.

[@FrankyboyLegend]

Is this code still active? I wasn't sure whether to buy from amplis or if a store close to my area (BC) would have it. I've had no luck as such. I was told Kerrisdale Cameras can ship it but they still get them from the east. Also, as I bought this lens overseas, I am not sure if Tamron Canada would honor its warranty. I'm not sure if its just me but the VC isn't quite as sharp as that of the Sigma and seems to leave fairly thick white edges. I know Tamron advised not to use regular VC for panning or high shutter speeds but these were not an issue with my Sigma. The main reason I changed it was because its VC started to jitter if I panned slowly diagonally upwards.

[@brajeshpilot]

Hi Is canon 80D compatible with Tamron 150-600mm G2 lens. Will it be possible to use all the autofocus AF features of camera on this lens for taking photos and videos ?

[@AllorNone23]

Awesome review. Thanks so much for putting in the leg work. I wished you had an Amazon link.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That I can do: amzn.to/2jgy1tG

[@AllorNone23]

Perfect, thanks!

[@misckicirina]

I have always been skeptical about these super zoom lenses because they do not deliver outstanding image quality, but your review is really tempting me to get one :)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

This isn't really a "superzoom" (it is only a 4x zoom range), but your point is valid. All of these 150-600mm variants are surprisingly good, though.

[@jaimeduncan6167]

Something to add: They are no match in terms of performance , subject isolation or image quality to one of the Super telephoto primes from Nikon or Canon at a comparable focal length, but we know how much that kind of lens costs and the lack of flexibility.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Jaime Duncan that's absolutely right.

[@graveey]

Out of curiosity are Tamron endorsing you at all for the video? Great video by the way but can never be sure of what's a genuine review and what's a subtle advert these days

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Fair enough. The answer is no, though. I get loaner equipment from retailers and distributors and do independent reviews.

[@graveey]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Great thanks a lot for the reply!

[@miguellopez-araus7020]

Thanks so much for this review. I will wait for the next review versus the Canon ef 100-400 version II. I am not sure yet what is the best of both lenses. May be the future review decide myself. Thanks Dustin!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

+Miguel Lopez-Araus it's a tough call. Hopefully I will be able to shed more light on the decision once I have done my secondary review

[@林雋庭-n8b]

Thanks for the review! Did the Tamron mark 2 had better image stabilizer than the sigma contemporary one? Opinions about this issue were controversial, what do you think about it?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It is controversial, isn’t it. I’m often surprised by that. In this case, though, I didn’t compare the lenses side by side, so I can’t say conclusively which one works better. The G2 will do a better job of stabilizing the viewfinder, but I’m not sure about the final image. It has the highest CIPA rating (5 stops), so it should be better, but....

[@MegaSasha500]

from the video you have convinced me that this is the lens I will be purchasing for a medium range telephoto. Need to know as to what software you use to tweak the autofocus on a dslr canon eos body lens as the 70d or maybe you can give a link to such a technique. Thanks!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Watch my video on the Tap In Console for a close look at my process.

[@kspec2001]

thanks for the comparison. i have been going back and forth between a few lenses ( 100-400, tamron, sigma 150-600 ) and even though I havent decided yet. your videos have helped me decide not to get the v1 from canon or tamron.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's a start! I do plan to compare the Tamron G2 with the Canon 100-400L II plus extender in a future episode.

[@kspec2001]

ok thanks! I will look out for that. also what made you come to toronto/scarborough to go to the zoo? im scarborough born and raised lol.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

kspec2001 I was attending a conference in TO and met up with the Tamron Canada people near the zoo so that I could do some shooting there.

[@kspec2001]

ah ok, was it pro fusion? if it was I gotta pay more attention to who shows up. cause i was there for both days. cant wait to see your next comparison

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

kspec2001 No, I was actually there for a missions conference (I'm also a minister/pastor).

[@peridot180]

Awesome review, as always. Trying to decide between this lens and the Sigma 150-600mm Contemporary for my Canon 7D Mark II and Canon 6D. I know you tested both lenses. Did you find the Tamron G2 sharper than the Sigma C? I'm leaning toward the Sigma currently because it's more affordable than the G2, but I'm still undecided.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I like the overall package of the G2 better, though I don't think there is a major difference in sharpness.

[@peridot180]

Thanks for the quick reply, Dustin. Going to have to think this over some more.

[@RomanCanas]

Definitely the best camera reviews on KZbin, subscribed! By any chance, have you tried the Fujifilm xf100-400 and how it compares to this one?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I'm afraid I have zero experience with Fuji gear.

[@garyleonard6820]

Dustin, just finished watching the 150-600 g2. Enjoyed, and got a lot of good information. Could you tell me how you are calibrating the lens with a camera body, In my, case a Canon 7d Mark 2?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I like to use Reikan FoCal software for calibration.

[@garyleonard6820]

Thanks for the quick response, and your informative video's.

[@Introverder]

Hello, I have Sigma S 150-600. Can you tell me which lens Sigma Sport 150-600 or Tamron 150-600 G2 has better IQ overall? And also better AF? I use C50D. Do you think that AF behaviour changes a lot if I buy Canon 7dmark2 cause now with my Sigma I have a really poor sharp images of BIF and a lot better result with more static situations. And also - adding 1.4 TC with C 7dm2 to S 150-600 Sport gives me still AF? When I was buying my Sigma there was no Tamron 150-600 G2, so I hope that this Tamron has at least a little less sharpness than my Sigma 150-600 Sport cause I will regret my extra weight even more now ;). I walk and shoot handheld and God Sigma S is a bit bulky and heavy. I went for Sigma S cause then it was the best deal if it comes to the sharpness at long end and also I've heard that with Tamron G1 there were some problems like with AF..

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I still think the Sigma Sport has the slight IQ edge, but it's not significant, and I do like the handling of the Tamron better (much easier on you!).

[@abhilawvlogs]

Hi Dustin please do a comparison between Tamron G2 with its all rounder lens 18-400mm.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I'm afraid I don't have either lens on hand, and that is not a reasonable comparison.

[@abhilawvlogs]

I am having at present Tamron 70-300mm DiVC lens SP lens. Recently saw your review of 18-400mm. Can you please suggest is it wise to sell Tamron 70-300 & go for 18-400mm lens. My camera is 80d.

[@aaron62688]

great video as always. I am very interested in seeing a comparison to canon 100-400 and the sigma sport.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I'll do a comparison to the 100-400L II in the future, but probably not the Sport.

[@tomlee812]

Thoroughly interesting and a top notch review. I bought the G1 in England when it was first released and it is my go to wildlife (my main interest) lens and I have been very pleased with it. I can live with the build quality of the G1, but the G2 does look a real step up in quality. When calibrating the G1 (with FoCal) I found the sweet spot was at F/14 which could be restrictive for an already slow lens. I'd be interested to know if you've any feel for the sweet spot on the G2 (accepting that different lenses may vary slightly) as if it were to be around f/8 or better then it may be time for me to upgrade as that extra gain could be a game changer. Thanks again for a great review. PS I still use the Tamron 90mm macro you recommended some time back and still love it). Kind regards from England.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

+Tom Lee Tom, I'm scheduled to take a second run at the G2 and do some comparisons that time didn't allow the first time (and I want to do a crop sensor specific review, too). I'll run a test and determine optimal aperture.

[@seanbond8075]

Dustin, I have the Tamron 35-150 EF currently using it on an RP and there are times I'm frustrated with shots that are clearly not in focus that I thought were. You mentioned about "Calibrating" your lens for the camera body. I'm wondering if that might solve my problem. What is the best way to calibrate your lens? Thanks, Sean

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You shouldn't have to calibrate focus on the RP. That's reserved for DSLRs. I'm a little surprised that you aren't getting accurate focus on the RP. Perhaps you should reach out to Tamron and see if there is a firmware update. Also, what adapter are using?

[@datragicprince]

Dustin, thanks for this. What in your opinion is the easiest way to calibrate autofocus for the 5D3? Particularly for my Canon 100-400 MK2.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I usually use Reikan FoCal. It works pretty well, and makes the process simpler.

[@jelewis43]

When you speak of calibration are you referring to the camera or the lens?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The camera to the lens via AFMA or the Tap In console

[@dfj555]

What camera and lens did you use to film this video? Looks great!

[@subhadeep_apd8320]

Wonderful review..!! Please compare it with sigma sport

[@KaiHinLkh]

But again, comparing the image quality at f/8, are there any noticeable differences between them? The first version wide open at 600 mm has always been mediocre, but stopping down to f/8 improves it significantly. Given the light transmission decrease, it seems that you get the exposure of G1's f/8 with G2's f/6.3 anyways...

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Stopping down to f/8 still provides a notable increase in sharpness. In fact, it is very sharp at f/8 - 600mm now.

[@tszkinyiu]

Hi Dustin, very nice review. Does the auto focus works on Canon 7D mii with Tamron 1.4X or 2X teleconverters?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I haven't tried that combination, but I suspect it would be very limited with the 1.4x and no AF with the 2.0x.

[@JamesKagelberg]

Thank you. I would like to ask that is this g2 version good enough for taking sharp videos and photos of airplanes that are flying 6-12 miles away? Cameras that I use are Nikon D7200 and D500.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I haven't tested that kind of application so I don't really know.

[@JamesKagelberg]

Ok, thank you. p.s. maybe you should try...there's a lot to film....if you haven't heard about ¨geo-engineering¨, check it out, it's very much real..

[@andrewscott743]

Thanks so much! I’m considering purchasing the G2. Do you know if it would work with the canon EOS RP if I use the EF to RF mount?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It should work, but I haven't specifically tested that combination.

[@andrewscott743]

Thanks for taking time to reply. I just found your channel yesterday and spent several hours going through your reviews. Really appreciate you sharing your expertise. You have a gift for teaching! I’m just getting into photography and learned a lot from you!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's great to hear.

[@barneygrube]

Excellent, love your reviews. Are you planning on looking at the converters at all for this lens?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I am, actually, Tamron is soon sending me the lens again along with the TCs.

[@barneygrube]

Great, can't wait. Thx

[@CoachKarthik.]

Funtastic review.... thanks a lot... Even after almost 4 years this review makes sense. I have a question though. How does it compare to the 100-400 is ii. I know they are both different. But a friend of mine told me that when shooting birds in flight the tamron 150-600 g2 is obsolete and we can always crop the image from 100-400 instead. Is it true. By the way I am going to use it on a 90D body for bird photography....

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I don't really agree with your friend. Why then buy a telephoto at all? Just deeply crop your 24-105mm... I always recommend that if you regularly shoot a certain focal length, buy the lens that covers that natively. I do think the Canon is the better lens overall, but it certainly isn't better at 600mm. Still, on a 90D you may find that the 400mm reach is enough, and you can always supplement that with a 1.4x TC when you need a bit more reach.

[@karthikr177]

@@DustinAbbottTWI wow...That's a fast and beautiful reply. Thanks a lot ... With the extender it will be more than doubles the cost of the tamron. Also the focus and sharpness also takes a hit. I am as of now using the 55-250 along with 18-55 and 50mm on my 80D and am finding the 250 as a bottle neck a lot of time. If you are saying the 150-600 is good for birds in flight then I think that's the lens i should pair with my next cam the 90D. Its coming next month. Hope the focus and sharpness is good. Again thanks a lot for the quick and detailed reply. Thanks a ton - Karthik from India

[@HotGates]

Great review, as a Nikon shooter I bought the G2 lens and I must say I like it better than my Nikon 200-500 I had, but wanted to ask I have the Nikon 1.4 III converter this should save me from buying the Tamron 1.4 don't you think? thanks.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Have you tested the combination? I don't shoot Nikon. I suspect it will work okay, though the Tamron TC may be slightly more tuned to the Tamron focus algorithms.

[@HotGates]

Dustin Abbott no I haven't tested it yet, but I think I'm going to trade in my nikon 1.4 III for the tamron, it may very well be that it'll focus better with the Tamron 1.4. Have you tried your Canon extender to see if you saw a difference with the Tamron? Thanks.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The Canon extender does work, but I haven't field tested them enough to see if there is a real difference.

[@HotGates]

Dustin Abbott Ok it's been raining non stop here in Seattle to give it a try but once the weather clears up I'll take it for a spin before I trade it in Thanks and keep those reviews coming ;)

[@godisgreatttttttttt]

Hi, i am planning to buy this lens for Wildlife photography, specially birds. I will be using it with a canon 7d mark2 body. Will it be a wise option for the same? i have a doubt about the focusing speed of this lens ?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Focus speed is actually quite good, and the 7D II has a good focus system. Should be a nice match.

[@spillebeenkenny7120]

What about low light conditions?Thx

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That is going to depend a lot on your camera. F6.3 isn't a ton of light, so a better camera will do a better job focusing in low light.

[@johnwayne9702]

Dustin. How would the Tamron perform for sporting events at night? Football / Baseball?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

There’s nothing wrong with the lens for that, other than the fact that a slower maximum aperture lens is usually not preferable in low light situations as you have to really crank the ISO to keep the shutter speed up.

[@davenapox5464]

Cool, thanks for the review and images. I’m really interested in your thoughts between the G2 and the canon 100-400mmL 2

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That will be covered in a future review. I only had a brief period of five days with the lens and focused on the comparison to the previous gen lens.

[@davenapox5464]

Awesome, can’t wait to see it! I’m on the fence on what to get to go with my 7D2.

[@phillipcolling]

may be a dumb question... but does the G2 still do good auto-focus with video for canon mark iii or mark iv? i just bought the 100-400 canon IS ii but found the g2 for 1100 and was curious if it may work better.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I doubt that it would work better than the Canon (it has fantastic focus!), but I do think the Tamron would work fine.

[@alr5376]

Great!. Thank you.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You are welcome!

[@maxfactor4209]

Dustin, I gonna 150-600 lens but I m not sure which one to get. I m using canon 80d currently and planning to move to 6dmk2 once it out. I heard tamron lenses are generally focus better on canon bodies (not sure). between sigma 150-600 C and tamron 150-600 G2, which one do u suggest? in terms on sharpness at the tele end as well as focus accuracy. thanks alot in advance.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I'd personally go with the 150-600 G2. It focuses better, yes, but also has a much nice build and better weather sealing. Image quality is roughly equal across the two.

[@stephanielauber4225]

Thank you for this great video review on this lens. : ) Your reviews are always so detailed and really help me make decisions on my lens and camera purchases. I'm really looking forward to a comparison between the Tamron 150-600mm G2 and the Canon 100-400mm mk II (especially with the 1.4tc mk 3 attached). I own the Canon and am wondering if it would make sense to purchase the G2 if I want the extra reach for small birds and other things. Thanks again!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

+Stephanie Lauber The G2 is my favourite of the various 150 to 600 mm lenses. If you need to reach, it is a great option

[@BB-ft6nd]

I'm getting a G2 for my A99II.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Enjoy! that should be a nice platform for that.

[@aqeelalnasseri3071]

Thanks A lot for the great video. Curently im using sigma 150 - 600mm sport version.. Could you please advise me whether to go for tamron or to stay with my curent lense, is it gud id i opt nikon 200-400 F4. 5.6. Could you please guve A detailed comparison of the three.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I can't comment on the Nikon (haven't used it). If you are happy with the Sport, then stay with it. The Tamron is close to your lens optically, but is quite a bit lighter and easier to handhold.

[@eggr17ify]

How would you go about calibrating the lens? I have it paired with a canon 80d. I always get somewhat soft images even at 1000+ shutter speed

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Take a look at Reikan FoCal. It's my preferred software for automating the calibration process.

[@eggr17ify]

Dustin Abbott thank you very much!

[@TheMrBennito]

if you're 'not a pro' at BIF work, where does that leave me?! :( (just kidding). Subscribed after absorbing the information in a couple of your excellent reviews.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

+TheMrBennito Hey, I’ve just got to be honest

[@TheMrBennito]

Dustin Abbott if you are, and you áre, you don't nééd to be :) thanks again mr Abbott, your extensive work is appreciated by me and so many others

[@Mrhukaka88]

i like the light of G1 and i am just doing research for canon 100-400 MKii,tamron 150-600 A011,G2,Sigma 150-600 C,Sport. Sigma 50-500,and tamron 100-400,sigma 100-400 to fit my 80D,hope i could find my answer here.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

If I were buying one for the 80D, I'd probably go with the Tamron or Sigma 100-400. Still a lot of reach, great price and IQ, and a nice fit weight and balance wide.

[@mohan16862]

Nice one. Can u please do similar comparison with sigma 150 - 600 sport? . Im looking more of image quality and af accuracy.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I'm afraid not. I don't have either lens in hand right now and have a long lineup of other reviews to do.

[@JonasKnutson91]

Did he make a compairison to the canon 100-400? Cant seem to find it

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

There is some limited comparison in this review, but I had the lens for a very brief window and didn't have a lot of time for comparisons.

[@JonasKnutson91]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Ok, i’m having some troubles choosing between these two. If you could choose one for wildlife, which one would you pick?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I've owned the 100-400L II and 1.4x for years and consider it to be a great combination.

[@JonasKnutson91]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Ok, thanks. I might go with the 100-400 then, I trust you'r opinion, you'r reviews are very thorough

[@fgb875]

IM HAVING PROBLEMS WITH THIS LENS, AFTER 450 mm THE AUTOFOCUS STARTS TO HUNT... AND CANT TAKE PICTURES IF IM TRYING TO GET WILDLIFE IN THE FRAME FAST, IS THERE A SOLUTION TO THIS PROBLEM? ALL READY TRIED THE TAP IN CONSOLE, UPDATED THE SOFTWARE, BUT STILL, IT STILL HUNTS AFTER 450mm. ANY IDEAS?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's more a question for Tamron. I never saw that behavior in my tests.

[@fgb875]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Thanks for your prompt response, I tried to call them, (a recording answers) and seems that they only now work through emails, cause of the virus, don't understand that part, the virus doesn't propagate through phones.. and people can actually work from their homes... weird... probably I am going to have to send it to them but I need more info and maybe a return number or something like that... or do you have a number where they actually answer? thanks! again!

[@fgb875]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Thanks, i found the webpage on how to send it for warranty. thanks, again.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad to hear it

[@darkftforce]

hi dustin, I bought 5dM4 in December with kit 24-105 f4L II lens (before I had Olympus omdem1, then moved to canon 7dmII and now I m on full frame and wont be going anywhere else!) I want to built my lens gear for full frame as I m a hobbyist and photography is my passion. I m not that rich to afford several similar lenses but yes I wanted to & can invest in a good quality lens that can last many years. I am considering to invest in telephoto category and am confused to go with either tamron 150-600G2 (sigma is too heavy for me) or with canon 100-400L II? I do photography for myself because I love to and I don't earn from it. I have tried these on Henry's store but still not able to decide. what would you suggest in my case? just wanted to have an expert opinion for a long term investment. thanks.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Keep watching over the next few weeks. I'm working (today actually) on a direct comparison between these lenses on both APS-C and full frame

[@cglasadventure8473]

dustin make a comparison of tamaron , sigma C & S video of birds close up 600mm which is super sharp...a lot of us want to know the video quality .thanks

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I'm afraid you'll have to look elsewhere. I don't have any of those lenses in hand anymore and have a full review schedule.

[@cglasadventure8473]

in your own openion which is more sharp in video of birds details of feathers..in your own idea or analysis..

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

brigz las I think the Sigma Sport has the absolute best sharpness at 600mm, though it has other issues (weight, light transmission). I'd personally go for the G2 out of those options, myself. It has the best mix of features, build, and image quality.

[@jenshid]

How does it compare to the sigma sport version in IQ??

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

They are very close now.

[@paulwilliams819]

Hi Dustin, would this lens work well on a APS-C like an 80D?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Yes. I'll be doing that review shortly on an 80D. The lens should be sent back to me in a week or so.

[@stansmits5742]

How does this lense work on a Canon EOS200D camera? Any experiences?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The 200D doesn't have a particularly robust focus system. It would work, but it definitely isn't going to give you your best performance

[@b.d0091]

which one is better for birding & wildlife Nikon 200-500 or the Tamron 150-600 g2.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I think the Nikon lens has better AF

[@harshad6489]

Compatible with 600D alongwith with 1x & 2x converters? or just lens is compatible?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Just the lens - not with the extenders.

[@harshad6489]

Dustin Abbott okk thank u for the info sir!! 😊

[@jameslarsen9814]

Great video, Looks really good. I have to say, although the 'light' transmission might be a little better on the G1, that extra light transmission almost seems like it was blowing out some of the detail. Looks like a real step up, definitely a consideration for me next year.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's definitely putting out some really nice image quality now.

[@jameslarsen9814]

For sure. Looks fantastic.

[@tomdunlap509]

Distinct, would you choose this over your Canon 100-400mm V2?

[@tomdunlap509]

Geez, spell correct changed your name😒

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Not for my personal use, no. I really like the size of the 100-400L II. It's easier to transport, and it's rare that I shoot really long telephoto, anyway. I throw an 1.4X extender (or an 80D) on it when I need more reach. This combo works really well on the 5D Mark IV, which I'm mostly shooting with now. If I didn't already own the 100-400L II, though, and was considering price, that might be a whole other discussion.

[@maxx3997]

Love the 100-400 II, would never consider a third party again, had the V1 twice it was not even close to the 100-400 II under any circumstance & can't imagine the V2 being that much better than the V1 as far as panning & focus speed compared to the MK II:) The MK II is it....enough said:)

[@Peterogen]

Thank you :)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You're welcome!

[@averageconsumer5283]

thank u for moon shots!! Go Leafs Go ;)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

+Average Consumer LOL. Thanks

[@amritkrishna970]

Will this work well with 77d

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Sure.

[@amritkrishna970]

Dustin Abbott okay thank u very much replying

[@paulmorris4792]

useful thanks

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

My pleasure.

[@snibushds]

Thank yoiu.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You're welcome.

[@souravpramanick2116]

Which is best to buy?? Canon 100 400 is ii Tamron 150 600 g2

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That depends on your needs. For me, I own the 100-400L II + 1.4x for the times I need more reach, but I also own a camera that supports an f/8 combination well (5D Mark IV). I prefer the smaller lens. For others, however, an f/8 combination doesn’t work well on their body, and they would prefer the native longer reach. The 150-600 is the better choice for them.

[@souravpramanick2116]

I have the canon 80d

[@souravpramanick2116]

For wild life purpose

[@bharatwasi7584]

Thanks Dustin, loved your review and comparison. i would love if you can compare Tamron 150-600mm G2 and Sigma 150-600mm Sports. Which one has better build and Optical quality

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The Sigma has a heavier build (perhaps a bit better), but it is a LOT heavier. If you want to mostly shoot handheld it is a serious workout. The Tamron has a nice build but is much easier to handhold. They have roughly equal image quality.

[@bharatwasi7584]

Thanks you for clearing my doubt.