Hello, Tank Nuts! Here is your latest instalment of Tank Chats from David Fletcher, let us know what you thought of it!
@jansenart03 жыл бұрын
For the ads, I think it'd be very entertaining and endearing to open the ads using the traditional British apologetics of "Terribly sorry to interrupt in the middle of the video..."
@MB5rider813 жыл бұрын
I hit the like button before that mustache starts moving.
@GeremiasVi3 жыл бұрын
I enjoyed it
@davidhanson88263 жыл бұрын
Fletcher rulz
@1981krka3 жыл бұрын
@@jansenart0 and a few others are doing it is not the
@christophermarsh64372 жыл бұрын
I read an article saying that AEC weren't contracted or asked to design and build an armoured car by the British War Office; they just went ahead and did it (which is why the mk.1 used an existing turret and gun). They then placed the prototype where they knew Churchill would see it; he did, and ordered AEC to build more.
@shatbad29603 жыл бұрын
'The engine won't fit' 'Just put it in wonky, no one will notice' A very British solution.
@JohnyG293 жыл бұрын
Its just an engineering solution for that particular vehicle. I don't think nationality has anything to do with it.
@pipandbenji2 жыл бұрын
@@JohnyG29 for some, everything seems to hinge on nationality
@FrogWalrus2 жыл бұрын
@@pipandbenji it’s also a joke, and when it comes to ww2 “humor” it’s all based around the nations and their stereotypes.
@pipandbenji2 жыл бұрын
@@FrogWalrus better I go back to my drunkeness so
@scrubsrc40842 жыл бұрын
@@JohnyG29 17 pounder in the firefly, jam it in sideways..... ee lightning.... engine jammed in sideways.
@Chiller013 жыл бұрын
David Fletcher star of the interweb, the knowledge, the charisma, the facial hair.
@pluemas3 жыл бұрын
Always loved the aesthetics of this little car. Very unique with that big wedge front and it's boxy form. Always seemed like quite a potent armoured car with the 6 pounder and it's heavier armour
@Boric783 жыл бұрын
Not exactly little is it - I am amazed how big it is.
@adopipiska68283 жыл бұрын
Its prettymuch an alternative tank.
@AtheistOrphan3 жыл бұрын
Little? It’s bloody enormous!
@gusgone45273 жыл бұрын
I fully agree with it's aesthetic appeal. Just out of interest, what do you think of the FV601 Saladin? David has a video on that too. kzbin.info/www/bejne/foDKepyhrqt_ba8
@88porpoise2 жыл бұрын
In comparison to an M5 Light Tank it had comparable armour and a much better anti-armour gun. The big problem was that the majority of the time you would be shooting at infantry and the lack of an available and effective HE round meant that the American 37mm would generally be better (with its canister and HE rounds, combined with more available ammo and a higher rate of fire). The 75mm would solve that so long as it carried enough ammo and had room to operate it effectively. Would be interesting to mix a few of these into Staghound equipped units similar to give them some extra firepower, similar to the use of Firefly. I suspect its off-road performance also left much to be desired, a 13 ton four wheeled vehicle in the 1940s does not inspire much confidence off-road.
@maxkronader52253 жыл бұрын
A nice cup of coffee, Mr. David Fletcher, and a new armored car video from the Tank Museum. What a top notch way to start the day!
@russwoodward82512 жыл бұрын
David Fletcher is a national treasure. Thanks.
@2serveand2protect3 жыл бұрын
I never even knew this thing ever existed! :D ...that's why I come here! - you can learn something new and interesting each time a video appears, but - MOST OF ALL! - I LOVE to listen to David Fletcher and his "tank chats"! :) :) You could listen to this guy for hours without getting bored for 5 seconds.
@F4Wildcat3 жыл бұрын
I have waited...so frikking long for this video. The AEC has been one of my favorite armoured cars ever since i first photos in a book about it when i was 5. There is something just "right' about the looks of this unit
@sadwingsraging30443 жыл бұрын
Can we _please_ get Richard Smith to do more videos on some of the artifacts hidden away?!!? Those were great!
@ptonpc3 жыл бұрын
Agreed.
@richieb76923 жыл бұрын
Yes Please.!! His video of the helmet with the bullet lodged in it was Fantastic. It aslo has one of my favourite lines ever, ' Unfortunately the man didn't have the good grace, or common decency to miss' Beautiful British Understatement
@MrRunner3 жыл бұрын
AEC, Windmill Lane, Southall. Maker of the Routmaster double decker buses. I used to pass it every day as a schoolboy and sat alongside some of their Apprentices at Southall Tech. All gone now.
@alamore50843 жыл бұрын
I could listen to David Fletcher all day. Love these Tank Chats❤
@jimaltergott93262 жыл бұрын
I love this! I have found the "Holy Grail" of armour history and profiles of individual vehicles.
@darkninjacorporation2 жыл бұрын
I never realized how massive this armored “car” actually was
@kaiserwillhelm12 жыл бұрын
Same
@Ben-cn4hm3 жыл бұрын
I like to imagine David drives to work in one of these! 😂
@samholdsworth4203 жыл бұрын
He doesn't live at the tank museum?!
@MikaelKKarlsson3 жыл бұрын
@@samholdsworth420 yes, but he doesn't work there. ☺️
@AyebeeMk23 жыл бұрын
No; he uses it as his golf trolley!
@samholdsworth4203 жыл бұрын
@@MikaelKKarlsson 😝
@PalleRasmussen3 жыл бұрын
He is back, the Legend, the moustache!
@JamesAlexander143 жыл бұрын
You learn something new, every time a video is posted. Much appreciated. Thank you.
@martentrudeau69483 жыл бұрын
David's explanation the AEC engineering is very interesting, it seems very different from other armored cars and innovative. And a serious threat to enemy armor.
@michaelguerin563 жыл бұрын
Another great video. Thank you. Huge amount of relevant history in a very short time. A classic history lesson masterclass from Mr Fletcher.
@knutboehnert31633 жыл бұрын
Honestly any Tank Chat without advertising ain't good anymore! I would like a blooper reel of the advertising sequences.
@loupiscanis94493 жыл бұрын
Thank you , Mr Fletcher .
@gorazdvahen4922 жыл бұрын
Superbly presented, as always, by the Tank Santa Himself! Love this thing in WarThunder, earned Mark of Distinction right away, back in the day.
@KnifeChatswithTobias3 жыл бұрын
I'd like to see a side by side comparison with a Sherman Tank! Seems to me it would've been great for convoy protection.
@jansenart03 жыл бұрын
I bought some plushies from the Tank Museum and they were very reasonably priced, of high quality, and shipped POST HASTE to New York.
@danielryan66043 жыл бұрын
A company of heroes clasic, realy good for dealing with anything armored exept medium and heavy tanks
@1337flite3 жыл бұрын
Ooh the green on white flash is the same as the 2nd Cav Reg RAAC - which was the Australian divisional recon regiment from around the late 60s/early 70s to just a few years ago, when they re-organised all the bridages to have more or less the same establishment and made the division more or less obsolete as a tactical formation.
@cryhavoc9993 жыл бұрын
One of my favourite Armoured cars - a tank in all but name.
@peppermill71633 жыл бұрын
"Effective target" made me chuckle
@Tonys-Hobby-Room3 жыл бұрын
Absolutely love these little features.
@theroyalaustralian Жыл бұрын
This video has been listed twice in this playlist, but what a lovely bunch of vehicles.
@Gnurftl3 жыл бұрын
That bridge at 2:45 is the Levensauer Hochbrücke (Levensau high bridge) crossing the Kiel Canal near Kiel, carrying the road and railway to Flensburg.
@stevewindisch74003 жыл бұрын
Very nice catch. I was wondering though, why they passed armed German troops. It's obviously after the war ended, but I did not think the Allies were using them for local security for quite a while (the "de-nazification" vetting taking a long time). Must be 1947 or later?
@brittakriep29383 жыл бұрын
@@stevewindisch7400 : The german soldiers seem to be Feldpolizei/ Feldgendarmerie ( Military Police) , but i , german, also don' t know , what happens in this old clip.
@Gnurftl3 жыл бұрын
@@stevewindisch7400 All I can say is, that this is post-war, and pre-1954 when the bridge was refurbished and lost the towers.
@Splodge5423 жыл бұрын
Excellent. Never heard of it before. Or even very much of armoured car regiments except after El Alamein when they used their speed for pursuit.
@Zehnuss3 жыл бұрын
Wow that drive system of predominantly front wheel drive and four wheel kicks in when needed sounds like the grandfather of Haldex, this is like an armored audi TT
@perotekku3 жыл бұрын
Fingers crossed we'll get to see a Staghound on the channel someday!
@kaymarx96773 жыл бұрын
Skew-whiff you say? Thanks Gavin; your preemptive translation was a life saver.
@kiwicory1003 жыл бұрын
Happy Holidays to the Tank Museum....love the content be safe and well...and keep that content coming it is loved by the community!!!!! And a special hug to Mr Fletcher...a cup of tea and a biscuit for you sir....LOL.
@PE1JAS3 жыл бұрын
Very nice to show the exploded view of the engine, go on!
@tyronrossouw443 жыл бұрын
Fletcher is a gem.
@langbaobao2 жыл бұрын
The 1st Armored Brigade of the National Liberation Army of Yugoslavia, which was formed in 1944 in Italy and then moved to Croatia to join the partisan forces there, was equipped with M3A1/A3 Stuart tanks and AEC Mk.II armored cars. According to what I have heard, the AEC Mk.II was very well regarded and preferred to the Stuarts by the crews, not the least because of the gun which was more potent than the one on the M3 Stuart and could deal better with most of the rag-tag armor that the Germans and their various collaborators used in Yugoslavia. Apparently, the AEC crews managed to even knock out several 'Panthers' and 'Tigers' during the war. The Axis forces, of course, didn't have such equipment in Yugoslavia, they mostly had just obsolete German and captured Allied armor, but apparently the British instructors that trained the crews and personnel didn't pass up teaching them about the existence of Panthers and Tigers and told stories about how powerful they were. So, just like in other Allied armies, the Yugoslav tankers started seeing Panthers and Tigers everywhere as well. Hence why they created PAK 75mm armed tank destroyers on the M3 Stuart chassis...
@jasonz77883 жыл бұрын
Great work Sir thank you
@parrot8492 жыл бұрын
Very interesting and informative David, as usual. Delivered with your usual dash, suave style, and English panache. But please correct me if I am wrong, but there’s was never any mention of a date or time period this vehicle was in service; When was it first conceived and put into production? Where and how was it employed And how long did it stay a part of the Royal Army’s armoured force? Other than these and a few other very minor nick picky unanswered questions concerning this fascinating vehicle, this was another one of your marvelous videos! 👏🏻
@military-vehicles2 жыл бұрын
It's still a crazy vehicle :-)
@PakBallandSami3 жыл бұрын
ww2 tanks are so interesting and amazing because they were really first time in use after being invented in ww1
@aaronleverton42213 жыл бұрын
Spanish Civil War says "hello".
@alexrennison80703 жыл бұрын
@@aaronleverton4221 You know what he meant.
@aaronleverton42213 жыл бұрын
@@alexrennison8070 Did I?
@alexrennison80703 жыл бұрын
@@aaronleverton4221 Did you?🤨
@aaronleverton42212 жыл бұрын
@@alexrennison8070 You seemed to think so, now you're not so sure. Maybe you're not as much of a mind reader as you think you are.
@huwtindall70963 жыл бұрын
Waiting for a decent priced 1/35 scale model of the AEC! Love the aesthetics. Think Miniart are doing a full interior job which is far too detailed and pricey for a cut price modeller like me.
@coling39572 жыл бұрын
David looks like an old fella who'd wandered in of the street to tell you about his antique lawn-mower... :D
@kayb99792 жыл бұрын
I imagine that anything he had to say about his lawnmower would be very interesting.
@PakBallandSami3 жыл бұрын
AEC Armoured Car is the name of a series of British heavy armoured cars built by the Associated Equipment Company (AEC) during the Second World War.
@9r33ks3 жыл бұрын
Love your videos, guys!
@ataxpayer7233 жыл бұрын
Toyota USA's offroad racing team, used a similar fold up screen for their driver, to supplement the driver's goggles!
@nasmi14092 жыл бұрын
Those vids are already legend 😀
@jerryjeromehawkins17123 жыл бұрын
Zipping around behind enemy lines with a 6 pounder?? Seems like the perfect machine. 👍🏾🍻
@ptonpc3 жыл бұрын
I can imagine most things it comes across would suddenly have a bad day.
@Bornst3ll3r3 жыл бұрын
@@ptonpc rifle rounds go through that pube thick armour
@lavrentivs98913 жыл бұрын
@@Bornst3ll3r Not 13 mm of sloped armour and certainly not at ranges where you're unlikely to be hit by the armament of the armoured car.
@Treblaine3 жыл бұрын
It's like it was built war War Thunder.
@chaz87583 жыл бұрын
@@Bornst3ll3r 30mm sloped, no rifle rounds are going to go through that
@andrebartels16903 жыл бұрын
I like armoured cars 👌
@Daniel-S12 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@2serveand2protect3 жыл бұрын
I recently some footages of the "Legion Etrangére" - i.e: "The French Foreign Legion" fighting in Mali and..."surrounding ares"...but I rember they had vehicles that were oddly similar! (to say the LEAST, actually). They wre referred by the tropps as "Panhard's" (or in many other ways!) - but there was plenty of similarities (though correct me if I'm wrong). PS. It's always a PRIVILEDGE to be here! :) :) Thank you guys for this work!
@Lykas_mitts3 жыл бұрын
the Panhard 178 is a completely different vehicle; the 178B has a similar looking turret so that might be the one you saw.
@paulosborne65172 жыл бұрын
A beautiful brute of an armoured car. I also like the AEC Mk.II that was tested with the twin Oerlikon armed Crusader AA turret, which seemed to be pretty potent but was mothballed after the shift in air superiority.
@josephahner30312 жыл бұрын
Shame it was mothballed, it would have done excellent service as a fire support platform similar to how the M42 duster was used in Vietnam. Infantry would have found a twin Oerlikon in a fully enclosed turret on a relatively quick platform an absolute nightmare.
@mikesmithg0rfd3563 жыл бұрын
thank you
@b2tall2393 жыл бұрын
Each of these videos should include a comprehensive test drive by Clarkson, Hammond, and May.
@Cancun7713 жыл бұрын
I'd like to second that. Some sacrifices just have to be made.
@SteveSmith-wk9dx3 жыл бұрын
I'd settle for a test drive over Clarkson, Hammond, and... give May a running start to get away.
@christophermarsh64372 жыл бұрын
Hammond would crash it, break it, then have to be taken away in an air ambulance with paramedics cutting his trousers off.
@SteveSmith-wk9dx3 жыл бұрын
If I'd been crewing a Panzer II, I'd have been very glad to spot one of these before it spotted me.
@teamidris3 жыл бұрын
That’s not an armoured car! That’s an armoured truck :o) I wonder what the transfer box clutch was? One way ratchet?
@michaelbevan3285 Жыл бұрын
His comment about the height being a problem is well made. There is a photo of three of them knocked out by German paras with Panzerfausts and they were all visible above the hedgerows.
@theromanorder3 жыл бұрын
I remember reading about this tank and didn't have this much info and i already thought it was very weird
@benb33063 жыл бұрын
loved the look of the mark I. It would have been cool to have compared it with the Puma or Greyhound.
@WozWozEre3 жыл бұрын
Mark 1 would be at home in a Mad Max movie
@ataxpayer7233 жыл бұрын
Skew-whiff, my favourite British stew.
@Bojan_Kavedzic3 жыл бұрын
In the single engagement on the approach to Trieste "major" armor to armor engagement in Yugoslavia was fought. Germans had variety of armor, including three captured T-34. After initial loses to Yugoslav Stuarts, 4 AEC Mk.II have made an ambush into which Germans were drawn in. Fire from those hit the flanks and they KOd all 3 T-34s and at least 4 other vehicles, including SdKfz 250 or 251, some Marder variant and two light tanks of unknown type, probably ex-Italian. One T-34 burned down, other was heavily damaged (engine and transmission destroyed by multiple penetrations), and 3rd had turret heavily damaged with two penetrations. So they have used turret from tank no.2 to repair no.3 and rolled into Trieste on the T-34, among other hodge-podge of the armor they had. Repairing No.3: elektron.tmf.bg.ac.rs/bojan/armor/tanks/t-34-76/t-34-76_m43_03.jpg No.3 in Trieste, operational again: elektron.tmf.bg.ac.rs/bojan/armor/tanks/t-34-76/t-34-76_m43_02.jpg
@josephahner30312 жыл бұрын
I enjoyed this vehicle in company of heroes 2. It was cheap and had a solid gun
@gunner6783 жыл бұрын
Wonderful as usual. Didn't the Irish Army use these for a time?
@tonyjedioftheforest13643 жыл бұрын
As usual an extremely interesting video. What is the difference between an armoured car and a tank, is it just the wheels?
@pedroperez66763 жыл бұрын
Not the only difference, but yeah it's the most basic one. All tanks are tracked, and all armored cars are wheeled. Tanks are also always much more heavily armored and have bigger guns. They also have very different roles in the battlefield (armored cars for scouting, tanks for spearheading attacks).
@CGM_683 жыл бұрын
The major difference between the two is the role they play on the battlefield. A tank is specifically used to break the enemy line. Most armored cars in WWII performed reconnaissance missions, whereas this heavy AEC had more clout. So it could defend itself, when any other scout car would have to skidaddle. As David Fletcher alluded to, the AEC had an infantry support role, blurring the line between armoured fighting vehicles even more. It seems a total of 629 were built, all variants told, according to Tanks Encyclopedia. The Lynx (1990) is an CVR(T) Combat Vehicle Reconnaissance (Tracked), so the tracks can be used in a scouting role. The Lorraine 40t (prototype only) had tyres, although it led to the tracked AMX-50, somebody, somewhen, thought a tank could go without tracks from time to time. All terrain wheeled vehicles are getting heavier, if airless tyres existed which dealt with ground pressure issues, would they be any more vulnerable than tracks? Who knows.
@PitFriend13 жыл бұрын
Pretty much yes. Armored cars tend to have thinner armor than all but the lightest of tanks as well. The advantage to having wheels and the lighter weight is that they’re usually faster, easier to maintain, and don’t chew up roads like tracks do. The drawback they have is that they generally don’t have as good cross country mobility as tracked vehicles do, particularly over soft or very rough ground.
@chaz87583 жыл бұрын
The British did toy with the idea of "Wheeled Tanks" for a while - the Guy Armoured Car was originally called a Wheeled Tank. In more recent times the Italians we had in Sarajevo in 1995 called their Centauros "Wheeled Tanks"
@Rynhelms2 жыл бұрын
It may not be the best but, it has character!
@kenbrown28083 жыл бұрын
I'm guessing it wasn't all that quiet, either. I suppose the reason it was front drive is because most vehicles with transfer boxes have the engine shaft coming in the front and the main drive shaft coming out the back, and they just reversed one.
@charleswade25142 жыл бұрын
Tanks, the ultimate Off road vehicle
@Crash-zm2qd2 жыл бұрын
They had those in North Africa and Italy during WW2 my great grandad was in Kings Dragoon Guards and they had some.
@tasman0063 жыл бұрын
My favourite British armoured car. I mean the mark 3 version a 75mm gun. What other armies had a armoured car with a turret armed with a 75mm gun during WW2.
@tamlandipper293 жыл бұрын
I double checked and the answer is a few. Wehrmacht and French for starters.
@shanevanorder26443 жыл бұрын
Germans had the puma
@konnigkratz3 жыл бұрын
But the 75mm was meh in terms of armour penetration compared to the 6 pndr
@aaronleverton42213 жыл бұрын
@@killdizzle Yes, but once you count how many Tigers and Panthers there were you come to realise that the actual backbone of the Wehrmacht's Panzer force was "etc": Mk 3 and Mk 4s, Likelihood of an AEC finding a Tiger or Panther? Low. Likelihood of finding a Mk 3 or Mk 4? Rather higher. Also, any number of German AFVs which were not limited edition sports specials.
@Niitroxyde3 жыл бұрын
Very fine looking
@ericgrace99953 жыл бұрын
The German approach to armoured reconnaissance. Fight for intelligence? A big vehicle with a big gun that can look after itself and slug it out with enemy recon. vehicles.
@paintnamer64032 жыл бұрын
There was the slant six, I think this could be the crooked six.
@pedroperez66763 жыл бұрын
AEC Diesel sounds a lot like AC/DC
@MililaniJag2 жыл бұрын
Photo @ 4:45? Are those captured Germans (no guards?) or is the AEC captured? Great info! Cheers!
@antonyborlase39653 жыл бұрын
Heres one for the Tank Museum crew, why so many BESA"S rather than Vickers mg's on Brit tanks?
@builder3962 жыл бұрын
British: *Make an absolute unit of an armored car with light tank levels of armor and whats essentially a Cromwell turret* Also British: "Great, now its too tall for recce."
@KARLMARX563 ай бұрын
Monstrous
@matthaught47073 жыл бұрын
Mr. Fletcher could read the back of a cereal box and make it snarky and interesting.
@michaelmiller6412 жыл бұрын
Great!
@aymanayad72303 жыл бұрын
Still kinda feels weird how these small armored cars are practically obsolete nowadays
@tamlandipper293 жыл бұрын
Depends where you are and who you're fighting. Plenty of wheeled fighting vehicles out there.
@pavarottiaardvark34313 жыл бұрын
Still are. The Panard AML is still in service in europe, the mid east, central america, south america and all over africa
@sebastiannicolaikaupe51753 жыл бұрын
Russia's go the BRDM 2 in all its glorious variants. Germany and the Netherlands are using the Fennek recon vehicle. The French have the Panhard. Armored cars are still around, they simply no longer mount big cannons.
@BillKermanKSP3 жыл бұрын
@@sebastiannicolaikaupe5175 Well, the Panhard has a huge gun
@sebastiannicolaikaupe51753 жыл бұрын
@@BillKermanKSP You're right, sorry, forgot about that. French armed forces aren't exactly what I know most about. Didn't they plan to replace those with the VBL, though, or am I mistaken?
@IrishTechnicalThinker3 жыл бұрын
AEC in company of heroes 2.
@dynaflow6663 жыл бұрын
This thing looks quite brutal.
@jured.79763 жыл бұрын
Maybe the last armoured combat during WW2 in ex. Yugoslavia was between Yugoslav AEC AC and German Beute T34 during race to Trieste . After few shots, Germans fled in terror, leaving their tank behind.
@rogerbond78113 жыл бұрын
I think AEC built a bus where the engine axies did not line up. I think it was canted, twisted and tipped fore and aft. AEC was a well respected company when I started work in 1970 at BOAC.
@pvtmalo32173 жыл бұрын
Woho! I love these vids
@walt_man Жыл бұрын
That turret instantly reminded me of a Cruiser Mk8 tank and a Cromwell! Too big.
@yereverluvinuncleber3 жыл бұрын
Automatic LIKE. It is big, it has character, it looks British, it is British, it is unique, it looks functional but mad at the same time but most of all it has a moustache.
@Stribog13372 жыл бұрын
2:48 Anyone knows what is going on in this picture? How are the Germans and the British so nonchalantly on the same picture?
@randyhavard60843 жыл бұрын
A tank in all but name
@V8_screw_electric_cars3 жыл бұрын
Front wheel drive, interesting.
@fosty.2 жыл бұрын
My grandfather crewed these in the war.
@ZurLuften3 жыл бұрын
I bet the tank museum is starting to run out of vehicles by now :D ... Seriously, how many are there in the collection?
@tasman0063 жыл бұрын
Plenty more where that came from.
@diestormlie3 жыл бұрын
*Glances at the Restoration Building* Ehh, they'll manage for a while longer yet!
@jonwingfieldhill61433 жыл бұрын
if you ever have a chance to go id highly recommend going when the conservation centre is open they have a large collection of rare and one of a kind vehicles in storage there and they have an interactive touch screen system so you can look at each vehicles specifications etc. they are barely scratching the surface with these videos.
@zxbzxbzxb13 жыл бұрын
I read they had 297 vehicles but that was a very long time ago. Think they'll be able to keep it up for a bit longer yet :)
@jamieslingsby99072 жыл бұрын
Love this vehicle in the tabletop game 'bolt action' has killed more tanks in the games i've used it than pretty much all of my actual tanks and tank destroyers.
@ironseabeelost11403 жыл бұрын
This vehicle with a 75mm and its armour could be used today in limited roles!
@terrysparrow21802 жыл бұрын
Maybe, but in this day and age anti-tank missiles can probably do the job better and at longer ranges than a gun. Also you don't need such a large vehicle to mount ATGMs
@scoutdogfsr3 жыл бұрын
In many ways I find armored cars and non tracked fighting vehicles more interesting than tanks.
@zoranocokoljic89272 жыл бұрын
@ 1:55 those two AC seem to have Yugoslav flag painted on. Were they delivered to the allies during or after wWII (as unneded junk, probably)?
@gusgone45272 жыл бұрын
You can see where the idea came from for the much later Fox. The British army did like their armoured cars. I wonder when they will "give in to the urge" after being without one for so long? Panther is the closest thing in the current inventory. It's just not "British" enough. We need a quirky homegrown design.
@timsweet32243 жыл бұрын
they had just as god armour than valentine .them matador are brill lookin trucks they can go any where aggressive lookin aswell like most british trucks and armoured cars fromww2 i thank you .says arfer.