Mazda CX-5 vs. CX-50: Definitely Buy THIS One!

[@Walksomemore]

I have tested both cars. The 50 is a really cool-looking, low-slung car with the right buttons (a la Subaru Outback) to make it feel outdoorsy - and while it's not a Jeep or Isuzu Trooper, it is pretty outdoorsy - but for my money, the CX5 intelligence, feature set, and suspension wins. Unless something really jumps out, I'm leaning toward a CX5.

[@NoHypebeastZay]

Any update?

[@alexferrara9287]

Intelligence and feature set is the same for the most part. Trim for trim their options are very similar. CX-5 rear suspension is superior in everyday use but, the CX-50 has a more modern interior with panoramic roof, something that isn’t an option on a CX-5 trim. Both have the same engine/trans and they have the same performance numbers. CX-50 feels more stable in unidirectional changes and swift turns due to the lower stance. The CX-50 feels more comfortable driving around town cause it’s not as stiff.

[@lennartengel1971]

Best selling point for the cx5 is that it is assembled in Japan where the work ethic and quality controle is like nothing else. So the cx5 instead of the cx50 for me.

[@franciscovasquez9781]

One of the few Japanese vehicles still made in Japan with Japanese components.

[@xxstealerxx]

"work ethic" i.e. where they're worked to the bone and commit suicide

[@vindictiv6880]

​@@xxstealerxxthat and a LOT of models from reliable brands (ie: Honda, Acura, Lexus and Toyota) are actually made in NA and you don't hear ppl snob them because "not made in Japan". They are still considered as reliable.

[@alexferrara9287]

@@vindictiv6880True but the fit and finish is still superior generally speaking. That said, since the CX-50 is being manufactured in collaboration with Toyota, it’s still very high quality. Both are excellent vehicles.

[@daveg.4862]

What I love about Mazda is they drive Great, have real transmissions with gears, and are very reliable. While never the cutting edge, they are among the best long term buy. As Subaru has fallen with leaky engines, crappy CVT's and even weak AWD systems, Mazda had risen with real engineering, reliability, and design.

[@richeyrich2203]

Can you link me to some write ups about Subarus lacking longevity? I’m trying to make this decision now and really like the modern Subaru but am torn between it and a choice of Mazda/Toyota/Honda models.

[@scottlowell493]

My subaru tribeca was a lemon. Horrible car.

[@RobbDzzz]

My humble opinion, having been living with a Mazda 3 the last 6 months, I enjoy the command knob and buttons to control the infotainment system, it becomes very intuitive and it’s nice to not have to aim your finger at the screen. I wish I could add it to my Tacoma rather than the touch screen.

[@rafars2246]

That's what I was thinking and I don't even own a Mazda yet lol

[@joannelower9554]

U0m

[@oness1334]

Yup I love mine too but I always hear reviewers knocking it yet they only get to drive the car for a short period. Living with one is different.

[@iamtheuse6321]

I find the real plus is you don't have a screen center of the dash covered in finger prints.

[@peterjordan2738]

@@oness1334 U bet.

[@bac0n_b1tz]

I just bought a 2023 CX-50 in soul red in April. I love it. Smooth, comfortable driving in the city, on the highway, and even on poorly maintained roads. The sports mode really makes it feel like a V6 when it’s only a 4 cylinder. Don’t see myself wanting to drive anything else anytime soon. I plan on taking good care of it and having it for at least 100k miles, granted it stays reliable.

[@TheMeanmarine13]

While my truck was being serviced, I borrowed my mother's CX5 and I have to say I was impressed with it. Not only was it a comfortable, fun little car for zipping around town, it's not hard to look at either 🤷‍♂️. Sharp little car for sure. 😁

[@Painting_Inspiration]

Tough little cars for sure!

[@scottcalhoun5524]

I think the CX30’s look much better than the CX5’s.

[@stevedickson3037]

@@scottcalhoun5524, interesting how people view cars. The CX30 is probably the ugliest car out there. Across all the manufacturers.

[@scottcalhoun5524]

@@stevedickson3037 🤣

[@nood1ez]

A supra is little, the cx5 is definitely not little. im slowing transitioning into suvs, but the cx5 is just too big for me. im digging the new hyundai kona N.

[@fixitforyou]

Just test drove both cars today! I have to say that I enjoyed driving the CX-5 more than the CX-50 and also liked the CX-5's interior cabin and dash design better.. I don't live on a ranch and don't do much off roading but from your video it seems that the CX-5 did just as well as the CX-50 in the off road test? However I can see why some people would be drawn towards the CX-50 because of it's rugged and probably sporty look )

[@josehuertas2441]

Soo which way were u swayed..?

[@fixitforyou]

@@josehuertas2441 my personal favorite is the CX-5

[@peterjordan2738]

Rugged CX-50 for the guys, CX-5 for the ladies? Although, being a guy I prefer be the CX-5. Come on add a hybrid to this🙂

[@thetechlibrarian]

It’s it’s a pair and as soon as you open the door, the CX five is made better, they really did a good job on that platform especially considering it’s 6 years old it feels just as good or better than a lot of cars

[@smoke05s]

I got the 5 yesterday. It will be driven on road like 95% of its life so that's where I want it tuned. We were actually looking at the 30 vs the 5, not the 50. The 5 handles much better. Stays flat when cornering yet still eats up pot holes nicely. The 30 was more cushy, a lot more body roll when you were casually driving than the 5. That kind of thing makes my wife seasick so that was the deal breaker. I was going in expecting the smaller 30 to have better handling and acceleration but the 5 blew me away. We also test drive a 5 with 50K miles on it and I think it handled better than the new one so that is something to look forward to.

[@Rich_G22]

I have the base model CX-5. Handles like a dream. Doesn’t have all the fancy cells and whistles but still super fun to drive. Mazda gives all their models and price points something to love and more.

[@sassouusasoo3607]

Do you have a family?

[@jimmy5634]

I have a 2024 “S Select” which is now the base model. Mazda has added a lot of goodies that used to be unavailable unless you moved up a notch. I love it. It’s not designed to be the proverbial “family SUV”. It’s more of an urban errand machine that is fun to drive. The current CX5 probably won’t be around much longer, but who knows, it seems to still be a unique vehicle and the sales are still there.

[@randyp6370]

I just purchased the same CX-5 in Blue Mica Signature, Mazda has really stepped up the interior quality, and it is very carlike in ride. Love it, it replaced an Audi which grenaded itself at 121K miles.

[@V8orNoCar]

Oh yeah, most mechanics have told me that no matter how much you take care of a Audi or bmw it’s gonna blow at some point. I heard Mercedes is still more reliable than those two.

[@meesr]

Was it a Q5?

[@randyp6370]

@@meesr No, it was an A4 with the 2.0,

[@eleanormassaro5195]

@@randyp6370 my friend had a 2008 Audi A4 that she had owned since new. I don’t even think she had 90,000 miles on it and she had to trade it in last year because It had a coolant leak that I understand is an expensive fix. But unfortunately she traded it in for a used 2017 Audi A3. I guess some people never learn🤷‍♀️

[@sassouusasoo3607]

How long did you have to wait for the car?

[@b9bot148]

The non turbo motor is the same as what I have in my Mazda 3 with the 2.5 liter non turbo. Has enough power to get out of its own way for sure.

[@Layinglow4412]

Just bought my first Mazda cx5 and love it smooth ride , has a banging bose speaker system that sounds amazing, and a beautiful interior. Very happy with the vehicle so far let's hope it stays that way

[@alexshraib]

The best part is the acceleration comparison: "very good and not bad" ... very informative and objective...

[@savethisforlater]

Don't forget "torquey"

[@jimmy5634]

The naturally aspirated 4 cylinder is very quick, it just isn’t ballsy from 60 mph on up. I’m happy with the performance. I’ve been burning 93 octane in it just for fun. I swear it makes a difference.

[@eleanormassaro5195]

I don’t know about this one. I still think the CX5 is a beautiful vehicle

[@davidwalker7945]

Drove both cars 2 weeks ago. Instantly loved the drive and steering feel of the CX-50 as compared to the 5. Yes it is progressively firm like a sports care steering, but I like road feel and feedback like that. And I fell its curb appeal is superior to the 5. That said, I don't think one could go wrong with either vehicle.

[@STRIKER520]

It's a outdated torsion vs independent in the 5. They cheaped out instead of using quality springs and struts that would of made it great on and off road. Not it's not good at any of them.

[@matsudakodo]

@@STRIKER520 I think you should test drive them both. Yes there are differences, but IMO KZbin commenters who haven't driven the CX-50 are blowing it out of proportion.

[@thesjkexperience]

I’d never driven a Mazda before. Two months ago I demoed the CX-9 and liked it, but a 50 had just become available and we tested that too. I preferred the interior of the 50 and the performance wasn’t that different. I had two other people in the vehicles, and I try and be kind to the new engine, but they were similar on the highway and general noise was similar. I’m waiting to see how the CX-90 turns out before deciding. I’m looking at a used 5 for my soon to be 15 year old son. Fun cars.

[@eleanormassaro5195]

I don’t know about this one. I still think the CX5 is a beautiful vehicle!

[@stevep8773]

Except from the back. Boooooring :-)

[@eleanormassaro5195]

@@stevep8773 no, I don’t think it’s boring at all. I like the new design on the tail lights in the back

[@jonwoodworker]

As a Signature owner, I may be bias. But the CX5 is still a better looking vehicle. I do wish I had the lighter brown seats though. I only notice I have brown seats on very bright sunny days.

[@kickyadick]

I have the same trim same super dark brown leather so I agree with you 100%. Wish it was a lighter brown.

[@peterjordan2738]

agree

[@danielrioux6410]

I find the CX 50 looks better - love that wide body stance. seems more planted

[@edgarcruz4034]

My cx5 is made in Japan 😎 that’s all I gotta say

[@Kevin-hp5fk]

Please don't use music over your videos in the future. It's very distracting, and for people such as myself with some hearing issues it makes it very difficult to actually here anything else.

[@sassouusasoo3607]

We dont care for your opinion.Dont like it go somewhere else.

[@Kevin-hp5fk]

@@sassouusasoo3607 yeah, asking for some better accessibility options makes me a total monster Right? I love people like you, I love that I can stress you out just by existing. Fortunately, not a soul alive gives a shit about your opinion but we do care about bothering you.

[@propagandada]

& if you insist on keeping the music bed, at least pick music that doesn't suck.

[@Cyberman86]

I agree music is very distracting and tiring when watching car reviews. Some of the Top car reviewers don’t use background music and its amazing.

[@SilverScarletSpider]

18:00 “Definitely buy the Mazda CX-50 Turbo instead of the CX-5 Turbo because it looks more rugged and is made in the usa”

[@bobbyrollins3207]

I was having trouble with your CX5/50 shifting at 5k WOT. Mine will go full redline (62/6300). Then I realized Mazda has a built in “hard” detent! Most likely, you were stopping at that detent. Just press a little firmer and it will pop past it and go WOT… I think you’ll be more impressed 😊

[@inctru]

I chose the smaller CX-30 over both. Personal preference. I'm also not a fan of turbo engines, as they are just another likely problem waiting to happen.

[@alanj7306]

Case did a great job! I would really like to see him doing more vehicle reviews. His review, thoughts, and opinions seemed spot on and unbiased. I’ve always liked the Mazda vehicles. They always look pretty nice and have decent price points. They’re nothing too special, but they’re definitely quality vehicles, dependable, stylish, and affordable, with good performing motors. The off-road test was just right here. That’s probably as far off the pavement as 99% of people will ever take them. Great video here. Just average priced vehicles that most anyone can afford. Even for being the upper tier models, $40k isn’t too bad these days and the starting prices are darn good. Fuel efficiency is solid for a vehicle this size. Haha 😆, my mom is in need of a new car and after watching this and posting nothing but positive comments, I’ll have to tell her to take a look at these.

[@jdfleetguy28]

​@@WW-wf8tu Kase is my Favorite TFL journalist. I agree 100% with Alanj, would like to see Kase review more vehicles. TFL really should use him in their videos way more then they do. Tommy and Andre are really good too. Roman runs a great channel, my favorite automotive channel, I just have a hard time watching him anymore, Roman just comes off unprepared and seems so goofy trying way to hard to be clever or comical, not sure what it is, I have to fast forward through some of Romans BS, I just can't take it anymore. Andre, Kase, and Tommy are by far the more polished presenters on TFL. Would really love to see more of Kase in the future.

[@peetfj]

I am very tired of the plastic cladding it seems nearly all manufactures are putting on. I prefer the cleaner lines with color match and think the CX 5 Signature looks very classy. Hopefully this will be a trend that other manufactures return to producing as at least an option.

[@eighteeneleven1744]

Agree 💯

[@Grooverski]

Drove both and bought CX5 Turbo.

[@kamikaze4928]

The turbo in the CX-5 is so nice to have. And by having it means, we don't have cylinder deactivation.

[@1976theenforcer]

That CX-5 sure looks nice. Not sure what I will buy when I wear out my Mazda 6 GTR. I'm sad they killed the 6 off.

[@SokemRokemRobot]

I'd like to see them come back with a Mazda6 Turbo w/ AWD., but not jack the suspension up. Or, even a RWD Mazda6 w/ a limited-slip differential would be a superior move.

[@El_ReyJ]

I test drove a CX-50 and I was not a fan. The height of the rear hatch is way too low. I sat in the drivers seat and there isn’t any side to side leg room so you knee rubs against the thick console. The rear seats are comfortable but that roof is too low I am 6’1” and I have to slouch otherwise my head touches the headliner. I wanted to like this vehicles but it’s too small, the CX-5 is better in my opinion.

[@davidwayne9982]

SARAH -N-Tuned took one of these up a hill that would make a jeep strain and it did it perfectly-- and on STREET TREADS... so STOP telling people you can't do it.

[@052188joseph]

The CX-50 is one that we might be looking into. My wife currently drives a cx3 and I really like the look of hers and the cx5 but the cx50 does look awesome.

[@peterjordan2738]

all subjective

[@Ram14250]

I actually feel sorry for the manufacturers sometimes. The Auto Journalists (TFL not included so much) are always pushing for "Handling Suspension" stiffer ride and road feeling steering and off-road prowess. Then the public get these vehicles and hate them. Too harsh, too stiff, tiring to drive. As an day-to-day vehicle, most of us (me included) would rather have easy steering, soft ride and quiet interior. 98% will never drive their vehicles off the pavement. For the most part unless it's a Corvette or Hell Cat, these are family haulers.

[@Suction_]

Absolutely nailed it

[@panzer_TZ]

Especially since most roads in the US are in crap condition. Pot holes, expansion joins, uneven pavement, etc. I don't know how people put up with cars with stiff suspensions as a daily driver. This is not even taking into account low profile tires and huge wheels. (God, why did they put 20" wheels on the new CX-50)

[@mxmerce]

I commented and said the same thing on multiple car reviews. The other thing is complaining about interior material quality. I think the review industry is why there are no longer cheap vehicles.

[@alanj7306]

Ram, I agree. I’d much rather give up a little handling performance to have a softer and more comfortable ride.

[@stuartaaron613]

Very nice video, excellent comparison. I currently have my second CX-5, a 2020 FWD Touring. I love it, but when the lease expires in June 2023 the CX-50 is on my radar, mainly because while the CX-5 has slightly more cargo volume (60 cu ft vs 56 cut ft in the CX-50), the CX-50's cargo area is longer and wider than that on the CX-5. The CX-50 sacrifices some headroom compared to the CX-5, which is why the CX-5 has more cargo room, but I need the greater length and width over the height. Either way both are great vehicles, and a credit to Mazda.

[@jackiekupper4972]

I just test drive the cx 50, I have the cx5, and there is NO headroom!! Very little leg space to

[@matsudakodo]

Hey, also have a 2020 CX-5 lease expiring in June and looking at the 50. Will need to take a test drive to get a feel for it. Not a big fan of the plastic cladding but other things about it are attractive. I won't trade up though-used prices are really good and you'll want to look at your contract to see what they valued your car at. It's likely you can buy it much cheaper than current prices.

[@stuartaaron613]

@@matsudakodo I went and leased on 11/28/2022 a CX-50 Preferred Plus. I test drove the Premium Plus, and found the leather seats uncomfortable. The cloth seats in the Preferred Plus I find better. I have just over 4300 miles, and I'm very pleased with it.

[@matsudakodo]

@@stuartaaron613 so it's an upgrade over the 2020 CX-5?

[@stuartaaron613]

@@matsudakodo not really an upgrade, more an alternate vehicle in that size. Mazda aims the CX-50 towards the Subaru Outback market.

[@gregnote771]

CX50, no matter how good it may be, the seats are rock hard. Can't enjoy the ride when your butt hurts.

[@mohammedaminebentaibi6777]

The cx5 needs the cx50's steering wheel and infotainment sys

[@wattheheck6010]

I am on my 4th Mazda, starting with the CX3 hatchback, and now my 3rd CX5, which my wife picked out. Mazda is an innovative and reliable manufacturer. Their AWD handles snowy weather well, but it's best to pay attention and not become a tow truck driver's customer (as with any vehicle). I would not take it 4-wheeling, but I do take it fishing. I like a little technology, mostly for safety, but not a distraction. The visibility is great in the CX5. My attitude is to pay attention to the road and my driving. A fighter pilot friend told me years ago, look 1/2 - 3/4 mile ahead of you as you drive. Then if something happens in front of you, you have time to react. Your eyes will focus immediately on the hazard, compared to looking up from your dash and/or no farther than one car length ahead. Did I mention keeping your hands off your cell phone? These days I'm looking at the CX90, but not the PEHV or turbo. I prefer better gas mileage. My POV. I wish Mazda would build a small pickup truck using their amazing styling and engines. Thanks for the post.

[@matrix-fh9tn]

Wheel size should be optional. I would take 17" on AT tires over more expensive and heavy yet less capable 20" on a "rugged"(not fancy) SUV.

[@hustler539]

Would like to see this CX 50 go on the rollers to really test out that awd system. As it is I don't really see too much difference other than the styling compared to the CX 5.

[@digitaldoc100]

The CX5 and CX50 have the same AWD system, so they should perform the same on the rollers.

[@stevep8773]

@@digitaldoc100 But the CX-50 has a cheap twist-beam rear axle? Hard to imagine the driveline is identical

[@digitaldoc100]

@@stevep8773 was thinking about how the AWD systems works at shifting the power around should be the same as afaik Mazda only has one system.

[@WARnTEA]

@@stevep8773 This is actually a benefit. Torsion beams are inherently worse than multilink conceptually, but with a lot of R&D it is possible to tune a Torsion Beam so it feels nearly identical to multilink outside of extreme edge cases that you’d primarily only find on a race track with highspeed turns. By doing this, you get added benefits from Torsion Beams, they are mechanically simpler so its easier to maintain, its cheaper and quieter due to less parts. Torsion beams are also lighter because they don’t need a subframe. They also allow for more cargo room/AWD room since they take up less space. In terms of speed Torsion is still good. The Civic Type R had a Torsion Beam suspension. They said they went to Torsion Beam because it provides an improved rear roll rigidity saving extra weight by not needing an anti-roll bar. I personally don’t think its a coincidence that Toyota bought 5% of Mazda and agreed to a partnership right around the same time that Mazda released their patented Torsion Beam and Skyactiv high power/efficiency engines. Then all of a sudden the first car Mazda and Toyota produce as partners at the Alabama plant just happens to have a Torsion Beam suspension even though Toyota hasn’t used Torsion Beams for something like 25years. It just doesn’t make sense for Toyota to partner with a small company like Mazda and give their Hybrid technology to Mazda unless there is something valuable they wanted to learn from Mazda.

[@stevep8773]

@@WARnTEA Well, I agree to a point but I think we can agree torsion beam is considered "cheap & cheerful". Good value for money and as we agree better packaging - esp for an EV. But no luxury car ever touted its torsion beam suspension and no one ever "upgraded" a model to TB. And if you look at this new "U" configuration, it appears the coils are doing a huge bend when they actuate. Obviously I trust the engineers, but the spring rates have to be weird as a result. Typically, a TB coil operates almost perfectly linearly and vertically. Testers have pointed out the CX-50 ride is not as good - despite them glossing over a lot (like the uglier exterior and interior) which means it must really be bad, I suspect. But it will improve with 800 lbs of battery in the back, I bet :-)

[@alexanderperry7821]

I think this is a bit of a missed opportunity for Mazda. They have the more street oriented CX5 so why not take the CX-50 a bit further to actually compete with the Subaru Wilderness line up? I would have used those as a benchmark - 9.2/9.5 " clearance and 20 degree + approach angles, comprehensive under-body protection. I have an Outback Wilderness and have taken it on some technical trails - it's very capable. I don't think the Mazda CX-50 would really compete outside of rougher dirt roads. But then that begs the question - how much more capability than the CX5 is this really providing? If you wanted additional off-road capability an Outback Wilderness is probably the better choice, as I really think the regular CX5 will do almost everything this would do.

[@SokemRokemRobot]

All the CX-5 needs is to take off the street tires to do better off-road.

[@alexanderperry7821]

@@SokemRokemRobot That doesn't help the approach/departure angles or ground clearance though.

[@PsyhoBelka]

guys, please, when speaking about numbers - like hp, torque, size and so on - bring this numbers on the screen with some text, please!) and thanks for comparing this two perfect cars)

[@WRDW_OKC]

Own a 2021 CX-5 Grand Touring Reserve in white. Oh daddy. My wife has a 2015 6, and it's her baby. But, I've noticed she finds reasons to drive the CX-5 more often of late. I have driven both in Colorado. The 6 is awesome, and with the paddle shifters, it can dance. The CX-5 is just a terrific road warrior. Great seats and effortless to drive. Didn't think I would like the radar cruise control, but it's excellent. Our family, kids and grandkids, own 8 Mazdas currently, BTW.

[@Papolucho702]

We took our CX 50 on a 100 mile windy road and I disagree that it doesn’t “handle” well. That thing hugs the road and has zero issues cornering. Stop comparing this thing to a sports car, they drive completely different. The 2@ inch wheels do make vibrations more apparent but nothing to really comparing too much about, 18 inch wheels are more appropriate though.

[@Notheretoagree]

I've had 2 CX-5s and am looking at a 3rd. While browsing at the dealer I noticed the CX-50. The CX-50 looks great and has a huge cargo area and a better center console than the CX-5. What I didn't like about the CX-50 is the small sideview mirrors and I felt a bit cramped in the cabin. I love the CX-50s panoramic sunroof but again, being cramped in the cabin I couldn't fully enjoy it. I am leaning toward another CX-5. Overall I am disappointed with Mazda for making EIGHT different model levels. Also, no remote start on the keyfob. It's almost 2023, all vehicles should have remote starts.

[@paulh6517]

CX-5 no doubt. Nice rear end and no ugly cladding.

[@walkerl.9402]

My only wish was that specs of the other car were noted when the other was stated so it was more of a side-by-side comparison!

[@kc510]

They’re identical as far as engine power and transmission.

[@walkerl.9402]

@@kc510 all specs from dimensions to wheel size and price would have been nice to see side by side on screen.

[@davisflyer]

Recently had a CX-5 for a rental with the base engine. I really liked the way it drove and even though it was only a mid-range trim, it felt very high quality. Only two gripes were that power was a little on the weak side (go for the turbo!) and my wife and I found the front seats to feel a little too narrow.

[@dylanhughes5944]

Mazda turbos burn oil. Stay NA all the way. Honda 1.5LT have oil dilution. Turbos seem to screw things up

[@kamikaze4928]

@@dylanhughes5944 My 2021 Mazda CX-5 CE Turbo w/ AWD doesn't burn oil, and I even change my own oil and filter. Maybe, people shouldn't beat their turbos to death.

[@matsudakodo]

The CX-50 seats are a little wider.

[@destinyreturns4885]

Very informative review. I've been looking at both cars and between reading some of the comments that CX50 owners have made I'm leaning towards the CX5. I'm 62 and that comfort level is something that I do desire.

[@nosefirst]

I have a Mazda MX-5, maybe when I grow up I will look into a CX-50.

[@rougecat4762]

I got a 2019 fully loaded cx5 in machine gun grey with the light cream interior and I love it. ❤️

[@MidniteSan]

Cx5 turbo awd signature or carbon edition is still the best bang for the bucks, u get all what u pay for, no fake air vent.

[@SokemRokemRobot]

Unfortunately, the 2022 CX-5 Carbon Edition doesn't have the turbo option. In 2021, the CX-5 could be bought with a turbo for $32k. Now, you need to spend $38k to get a turbo on a 2022 CX-5. I'm glad I bought a 2021 CX-5 CE Turbo when I did. I'm gonna hate to see the 2023 prices. It's still a great vehicle.

[@SifuBang]

Will stay with the cx5 vs 50 due rear suspension and being built in Japan, unfortunately will say makes a difference in quality overall.

[@HS-lz8jg]

Would the cx 50 have a made in Japan sticker tho ?

[@ryanyomomma]

Just bought the CX-50 Preferred after leasing a CX-30 for a couple years. I love it. Been thinking about replacing the tires with the Wildpeak A/T's but still sitting on that. The 50 is certainly a step up from the 30 I previously drove.

[@etme1000]

Could you explain a bit how exactly? I've been looking for comparison vids between CX30 and CX50, couldn't find any. Thanks!

[@ryanyomomma]

@@etme1000 It's probably because the 50 is better compared with the 5. For starters, the 50 is bigger, yet I don't feel like I sacrificed performance for weight. It's also built for more offroad terrains (but more like offroad-lite) and the potential for aftermarket accessories tailored to offroad is better for the 50 than the 30. Among other things, the ride is more comfortable, quieter, and the creature comforts are a step up from the 30 I had. As I assume that you know everyone's preferences are different, this is just my experience between both vehicles. I wanted more out of my Mazda and my lease for the 30 was almost up. The 50 has what I want so I bought it. Plain and simple.

[@etme1000]

@@ryanyomomma Cool, thanks! I assumed (from reviews) that the 50 is noisier than the 30. Of course, the proof is in the pudding - ie one needs to test drive both, which I have not. How did the driving experience compare - I also assumed that the 30, being closer to Mazda 3, than the 50, would feel better. For me, the pleasure of driving is what I like the most in the Mazdas - after all, that is their guiding philosophy, and you can feel it.

[@albertatundra]

I am really struggling to see the difference between the two vehicles.

[@jakes5530]

They laid out the differences pretty clearly in the video…the rear suspension is different which makes the cx50 ride harsher, the cx50 can tow 3500 lbs with the turbo vs 2000 lbs with the cx5 turbo. Interior and exterior designs are obviously different. The CX50 is more expensive and built in America vs. the cx5 which is less expensive and built in Japan.

[@romeotrinh6415]

So you don’t see the difference maybe you are not interested to see the difference between the 2 young man try to show you! The only thing I agreed with you no difference between the 2 is the engine and Mazda logo ok

[@11aaf]

There are two obvious differences that I can see, which are the square fenders on the CX-50, compared to the round fenders on the CX-5. And the CX-5 has more interior head room.

[@vasiliosangelopoulos5199]

Both are super nice.. Depends on what you want. I like the sportier cx 5.

[@Its_Me0000]

Good job Tommy. I must admit, I would probably buy the CX-50.

[@lonnieberkheimer7575]

CX-5 all the way !

[@plohish1337]

well, if you check online prices, turbo trim on cx-5 is about 38k USD, while cx-50 us about 43k USD. Even i prefer cx-50 as most of the people do, 5k difference is not justified, you are not getting anything out of it except better look and touch display, while seats are even less comfortable.

[@EastMontana1]

I guess the guy driving the CX 50 wasn’t very impressed with it. I don’t know what he was expecting. Maybe an X 5 BMW sport feeling.

[@mycoyz8416]

CX5 is made in Japan which means better quality. Moreover, the first year model of a new generation probably means many potential issues.

[@imdone1967]

The 21 cx5 turbo models had engine issues , oil consumption. So it has had issues as well.

[@rockyboy401]

Would like to see Mazda to produce a Santa Cruz / Maverick CX-50 styled compact pickup built off the new CX-70 platform but doubt they ever would.

[@stevep8773]

They have some interesting stuff in the pipeline, but I don't think they will dive into that niche again in the US

[@robsrave8156]

It’s sad because they would sell like hot cakes in the cx-5 price range

[@hanzhenry5818]

Would be interested to see octane drags.. Low, mid, hi,.. this variable could be interesting.

[@bryanclark3739]

Gas mileage as well.

[@alanj7306]

That would be a great video to see if they could get these for a month or so.

[@SokemRokemRobot]

I bought that one in 2021, not the other one!

[@danielrogers4072]

No mention of the heated cup holders under the hood of the CX50😊

[@michaelbrown5980]

Haha I thought the exact same thing. Glad someone else thought it too!

[@christopherstraka849]

If they just added panoramic roof on cx 5. Whooeee... I would be in heaven. And some extra colors. Bonus. Japanese are minimalists. Quality, performance. All there. But we Americans like to stand out. Have something a little different than everyone else :}. Than again streamlined models a less options may be what keeps production costs down. Don't know. LOVE my Mazdas. Lease, but last 5 vehicles have all been Mazdas. Only bummer. Not too many people bought them. Now you see them everywhere. People are catchin on :}. Zoom Zoom. Love you Mazda...

[@kamikaze4928]

I've never been in a CX-50, and I love my 2021 CX-5 CE Turbo w/ AWD, but it looks like the interior head clearance is less in the CX-50.

[@matsudakodo]

Yes, it is shorter.

[@kevinstarski1598]

Interesting he mentioned the turbo lag, at least in Mazda 6 there's virtually none, so I doubt there is one here. Of course it's not going to feel like a electric car with instant torque...you want some unpredictable turbo lags and behaviour, check out Korean cars...

[@jonwoodworker]

Yes, my turbo Signature has NO lag.

[@luvinsweetlife]

Which year and used Mazda models would you recommend for beginner drivers for adults?

[@srikanthvijaykumar9617]

I test drove a CX 50 and I could hear a lot of engine and road noise . I never owned a Mazda but I liked the way CX 5 handled the corners compared to cx50 however I don’t remember if both had similar road and engine noise .. can someone let me know?

[@sunsgettingreallow8318]

Get smaller rims

[@matsudakodo]

My test drive of the CX-50 revealed a quieter engine than the CX-5 (same engine). For road noise, nothing really stood out to me.

[@cgmiddle]

Great review, great SUV. However, now in March 2022 is NOT the time to be buying anything new or used...unless you can get a good deal. From what I have been reading in all news sources, this is very hard to do.

[@richeyrich2203]

When will be a good time?

[@GenXer333]

@Richey Rich It's going to be like this for a long time! I'm going to get screwed with pricing, but have no choice because I received a full buyback offer on my current car. Will have to surrender current car to get my check. Timing couldn't be worse. Got a full buyback from a constant failing CVT. I'll never get any car that has those again....which is why I'm looking at this one. The seats seem too narrow, but I'm running out of options here..

[@regsparkes6507]

Nice to show two models of one brand. This was an interesting and informative 18 plus minutes Gentlemen, Thanks for this!

[@MVRWC]

Would love to hear an interior dimension comparison especially the rear seat.

[@samthecarguy1143]

I actually bought a Cx-50 last week. I haven’t been able to do much off roady type things, but I’ve put 800 miles on it already. It’s comfortable on road trips, and I would love to go find some light trails and go drive down those.

[@karenandrearamos7226]

Last week and already 800 miles?! Damn 😂😂 how are you liking it, I’m thinking of getting one myself :)

[@samthecarguy1143]

@@karenandrearamos7226 yeah, 800 miles in a week and a day 😂. About 50 miles a day for work not including grocery runs, or runs to go see friends, and I took a weekend trip that put about 250-300 on it. I had a 19 CX-9 GT I traded in for it because the numbers worked out and the dealer didn’t mark it up at all, so with trade in, my cost went up only $60 a month. My other car is a 2007 FX45 and the Cx-50 to me feels somewhere between the CX-9 and FX45. Space wise, I’m getting used to the smaller crossover, but it’s the same size as my FX45 so it’s not too hard to get used to since I’ve road tripped the Infiniti in the past and been fine space wise. I love it personally. It does have a few hard plastics around the interior, but it’s not bad, they give it a more rugged type vehicle feel so to me they don’t bother me. It has this weird feel driving it where you feel like you’re driving a car and an suv at the same time, it’s unlike anything I’ve ever experienced in a crossover which adds to the fun for me 😂. The road my neighborhood is on is terrible with so many hard bumps, and the 50 feels good driving on it, it’s a rough ride on that road because of how bad it is, but it’s still comfortable on it. If you don’t mind a little rougher ride over a CX-5, and love the agressive style of the 50, I’d say it’s definitely something worth looking into. My friend/coworker says it reminds him of a Subaru Forrester. I’m curious to see how the Meridian does since that will be a little more off road based. mine is a Turbo Premium Plus, kind of like the one reviewed here, but in Poly Metal Grey with the black interior.

[@karenandrearamos7226]

@@samthecarguy1143 yeah I definitely need something I can go on long drives in, also the space is a must, some of the reasons I can’t do sedans, I’m a 5’11 woman and that leg space is a necessity. I drove a CX5 a while back and remember how smooth the drive was. Thanks for all the details!

[@samthecarguy1143]

@@karenandrearamos7226 i’m 5’-10” and fit with room to spare. Definitely check out a Cx50. It might be good for you. If it’s too small, the 9 is probably the next size up until they release the Cx-70 and CX-90. The 5 and 50 are similar in interior size.

[@karenandrearamos7226]

@@samthecarguy1143 cool! I think the CX9 might be a tad too bit for me. Thanks for the insiders!

[@EastMontana1]

OMG 😱 I thought the CX 50 was made in Japan 🇯🇵 That really killed it for me.

[@stevengraham185]

Love my New CX 5 Sig Turbo. Both cars look GREAT !!! Just like the looks of the CX5 better…Hey, that’s just me 😃

[@haze1123]

The CX-50 offers a touchscreen when you're using Android Auto or CarPlay. Big change and you guys didn't even mention it.

[@ILOVEBACONBOY2018]

Thanks for the videos! Love mazda. Have a 3 and 6 series and they have been excellent excellent vehicles.

[@peterjordan2738]

BB, I really love the 3 but have had a problem getting in and out in trial runs. Tough for a 74-year-old. Still love the car

[@jakes5530]

I like the looks of the CX50 better, but Id choose the CX5. The harsh ride of the cx50 is a huge turnoff. The cx50 also costs more. The only real advantage of the cx50 is the 3500 lb towing capacity, that’s a nice upgrade to see.

[@naughtysauce4323]

I would test drive them both, I've heard the opposite where the CX-5 was a rougher ride and the CX-50 was more compliant

[@jakes5530]

@@naughtysauce4323 yup good point, would always test drive before buying any vehicle. But just based off this video, seems like the cx50 rides more sporty/harsh especially with the 20” wheels

[@naughtysauce4323]

@@jakes5530 Yeah, I would personally go for a lower trim with 18's or 19's tops. My days of 20" rims are long behind me

[@SokemRokemRobot]

@@jakes5530 I have a 2021 CX-5 Turbo w/ AWD, and the ride is comfortable and quiet, unless you hit every pot hole along the way. I have no complaints.

[@jakes5530]

@@SokemRokemRobot yup my brother has a ‘21 grand touring… even with 20” wheels, it’s comfy

[@machfive916]

The CX-5 or CX-50 just may be the replacement for our 2016 Forester XT Touring. Great video comparison.

[@lukeg5051]

They should add suspension setting the driver can choose

[@ShiftyS550]

Apparently the wireless apple car play is touch screen as well. But only the ACP, not the native Mazda software. You’ll still have to use the turn knobs in the center console.

[@Anothertruecomment]

Personally I would recommend the 5 over the 50. It's Mazda's flagship vehicle and has been improved every year since it was introduced in 2012. The 50 just feels wider and lower to the ground, while the 5 feels more nimble with better handling.

[@matsudakodo]

Have you driven both? I think there is something to the 5 feeling more "nimble", but it has a little more body roll and a softer suspension overall in my experience.

[@mindspinn311]

10:05 you missed that the TFT middle screen changes styles. It’s multifunction information as well.

[@stewartbrands]

Only people like you are interested in speed and red line RPM. Most people are sensible and do not speed around or even think about 0 to 60. The norm is a quiet productive life, not needy anxiety driven attitudes which you illustrate.

[@roadtripmitch]

Have to love the 2 cup holders on the top of the engine, have a brew and tune the car! Why is there a red mark at 35 mph on the CX5, 10:03? Nice video, Safe Travels!

[@davidwalker7945]

The red mark is part of the "Navigation" system. It comes from the car's camera recognizing speed limit signs, then actively puts the red mark on the digital speedometer.

[@MrGuitarfreak132]

I got the CX-50. I liked the way it drove and felt sitting in it better than the CX-5. I think for people who like the more traditional SUV feel, the CX-5 will probably be preferred but if you are coming from a car like me the CX-50 wins in my opinion.

[@whatroads4x4]

My wife has the cx5. Its nice car all around. Not overly expensice either. Deffinately more comfieer than my wrangler.

[@WOOF95]

I want to know if the seats are stiff and firm. I rode in a 5 before and I thought I was sitting on a wooden bench. Great reviews from both of you.

[@kc510]

Speaking from a ‘21, they’re still on the firm side.

[@kickyadick]

@@kc510 I can also confirm this

[@girlperson1]

I bought the CX-50 Select Model which has the naturally aspirated engine. Love it!

[@jake9854]

but girls hated the CX50 though

[@donato777]

Do you find that the NA engine produces enough power for highway driving and passing ?

[@girlperson1]

@@donato777 Easily!

[@girlperson1]

@@jake9854I'm starting to see more "girls" driving the CX-50 so I'm guessing that "girls" are liking it.

[@jake9854]

@@girlperson1no way but girls think its too manly n masculine looking n too chiseled tho

[@tijdbederver]

I have that cx5 model, test drive the cx 60 definitly my cx 5 is much more fun to drive

[@cold02rex]

Similar mountain bike path performance. CX50 favorited because of looking "off-roadie". While having slightly less refinement and slightly more price. Hmmm

[@SokemRokemRobot]

Isn't that the same trick the Rav4 has been playing? Just looking 'off-roadie' must make it true.

[@perdidoatlantic]

5 is assembled in Japan. 50 is assembled in Alabama. 🤔

[@CaliAAA72]

One made in Japan and one made in the US

[@dyango111]

Do keep in mind that CX-5s are assembled in Japan while CX-50s are assembled in Alabama. You can't ignore the Japanese craftsmanship

[@roostersideburns3440]

thr cx 50 is made in the same facility toyota uses for the corolla cross over

[@b9bot148]

I prefer painted fenders and zero plastic. Plastic will warp and fade as it ages. Suburu did this to their WRX and I'm not a fan.

[@11aaf]

Plastic doesn't rust. And Mazda does things differently than Subaru does. Maybe, even use better plastic.

[@jamesa6272]

I have a 23 n/a cx5 grand touring or whatever the model is. The only thing I can’t stand is the delay when trying to accelerate quickly.

[@TheSlickpt]

I like the cx5 better

[@mindspinn311]

I have a 2022 Mazda3 Premium AWD (not turbo) and it’s a great car. I love the look and the amazing stereo. Sadly, my previous Mazda3 was much more fun to drive. I wish I had gotten a CX-5. I would’ve had to sacrifice most of the luxuries of the Premium trim Mazda3 for an equally priced CX-5 Select or Preferred, but it would have been so much better to drive. At least the grip of the AWD makes up for some of the ride quality and handling drawbacks inherent in the new Mazda3. Also, swap the tires. The OE ones are trash. DWS06 Plus was my choice and it was a dramatic improvement.

[@Just-a-guy926]

That sound track sounds like a 1970’s porn movie.

[@kc510]

Laughed out loud hard at this one! Too true.

[@chucktran5160]

😊

[@alexanderle239]

Tommy great as always! I’m really excited to see more young talent with this new(er) guy. Great job. More videos with you both!

[@alanj7306]

Ha, Tommy is my least favorite. He’s a douche.

[@oldshowfanatic77]

Kase has actually been around for awhile. He's been behind the camera a lot more lately though.

[@alexanderle239]

@@oldshowfanatic77 ah good to know. I listen to TFL talk and all that but I don’t know everyone’s faces/names. Also other guy: idk how you think tommy is a douche. Maybe when he argues with his dad but…if he’s a douche for that then so am I

[@rightwingsafetysquad9872]

Did y'all get to hang out with Mr. Goose at the press event?

[@davidwollpert5276]

I’d take the independent rear suspension of the CX-5 over the plastic cladding of the CX-50.

[@justinyost3627]

Assembled in Japan definatly sways me towards cx-5

[@dogsarefun2]

CX-50 built in USA at toyota plant (joint venture).

[@kamikaze4928]

@@dogsarefun2 That doesn't make it better.

[@imdone1967]

​@@kamikaze4928whatever makes you fell better about purchasing a smaller cx5... Lmao