We had a blast working with our friends at ExtraCredits! Go learn about the origin of dragons in their video, it's quite the fantastic *tail* : kzbin.info/www/bejne/qH2booacja6iaq8
@alina80145 жыл бұрын
good vid
@Spiceonthehill5 жыл бұрын
*hiccup*
@LordBloodySoul5 жыл бұрын
Just flew my Wyvern over here to get some realistic physics intake on the probability of Dragons existing for reals :D Thanks for pointing me the way, ExtraMythology/ExtraCredits :D
@Darasilverdragon5 жыл бұрын
You may actually want to have a looksee at the dragons in the old Discovery Channel special Dragons: A Fantasy Made Real. They used special 'flight bladders' that filled with hydrogen from fermenting meals in order to effectively reduce the mass their wings had to contend with, and could exhale the gas through their mouth - igniting it by a flint-and-steel like spark from minerals built up on their rear teeth
@zekelyness5 жыл бұрын
Except once you move down to 2 legs and wings they arent dragons. They're wyverns. So none won because you eliminated all the dragons.
@PRGME75 жыл бұрын
In defense of the enderdragon: it evolved in an entirely separate dimension
@thepacific29335 жыл бұрын
THİS MAN İS A GENİOUS
@korvix95365 жыл бұрын
PRGME7 HELL YAEH BROTHER
@idiotgoddess21145 жыл бұрын
That is true, so I think that would be a good defense
@newromanianmappernrm44205 жыл бұрын
Very True, also said dimension is made up of what is esentially thousands of giant rocks instead of a planet so în there gravity would be far lower, so the wingspan problem is also gone as long as we don't want it actually în The real world, as it's likely specifically due to what makes it able to fly în The end that it'd die în The real world, that being the far smaller gravity, which means it most likely would be too weak to hold it's own weight up and would be crushed by gravity irl
@thalmoragent93445 жыл бұрын
New Romanian Mapper /NRM Yep, makes the most sense honestly.
@Deepz0ne014 жыл бұрын
Harry: "Look Hagrid, im a dragon!" Hagrid: "No. You got no wings. You're a lizard, Harry."
@benjaminmiller36204 жыл бұрын
Gah!
@rubsidudes4 жыл бұрын
Shut up and take my like!
@khaos_theorem78424 жыл бұрын
You’re a hizard warry
@qdsw4 жыл бұрын
@@akshaysalekar7249 that was quite the ride
@wilag8er854 жыл бұрын
This should have more likes
@FioreFire5 жыл бұрын
came for dragon stuff, left desperately, DESPERATELY, wishing that ultra-fast flying penguins were real
@hkr6675 жыл бұрын
"Penguin Air 572-Tango, climb to flight level 2-7-0, heading 0-9-0, speed your discretion"
@valhalanguardsman25885 жыл бұрын
@@hkr667 AA penguin launcher
@theviniso5 жыл бұрын
"We have lost visual on penguin!"
@graveyardshift21005 жыл бұрын
You'll never catch me now, Batman!
@valhalanguardsman25885 жыл бұрын
@@graveyardshift2100 thats a good one
@dantegrandia19902 жыл бұрын
Fun fact about the 6 legged dragon. There is a lizard that glides big distances through the air with skin flaps that resemble very primitive wings. These wings are however entirely separate from any of its prior existing limbs. Pretty crazy.
@yourlocalreptileenthusiast2 жыл бұрын
species?
@yourlocalreptileenthusiast2 жыл бұрын
is it the draco lizard or flying gecko
@mancubwwa2 жыл бұрын
Exactly. The wings are actually modified ribs
@Rahul-Jain2 жыл бұрын
@@mancubwwa What if dinosaurs were dragon and we misunderstood their fossils as dinosaur. It is mentioned in Bible as well as in Chinese mythology about dragons but no where on earth dinosaur are recorded, now don't tell me dinosaur were 65 million years old, carbon dating method is already proved to give flawed results, it even sometimes give results like a thing would which is in front of us but will exist 1500 years from now. Radio carbon dating cannot show anything prior to 12000 years, as many catastrophe on Earth has happened which has changed the carbon sequence of nearly all fossil. By the way most of the dinosaur in your museum are just plastic and made up of cement, they are not real bones. Just think for moment how can someone imagine such a complex life form like dragons if it doesn't exist, how can something can come into tales, fables and stories. Most of our science is fabricated and mostly fake. geology is not what we are taught in school.
@TheMightyBattleSquid2 жыл бұрын
I was thinking about this as well when they said that. I saw it in a video about pre-bird flyers and something akin to an ancestor or simply a parallel evolution showed up.
@dbfr20175 жыл бұрын
I feel like calling Charizard a dragon is just rubbing salt in the wound
@microska26565 жыл бұрын
Mega X is tho
@beepborp58385 жыл бұрын
Swampertstill though
@zeppie_5 жыл бұрын
They should've put alolan exeggutor in there as well
@PHiLLy2c5 жыл бұрын
DBIYBIMWBIU it was
@rewrose28385 жыл бұрын
@@zeppie_ May I know what your profile pic is from?
@CallmeKeyiii5 жыл бұрын
Obviously the Enderdragon is the most realistic, just look at those cubes.
@Nikita.J-servantofgod5 жыл бұрын
Mudfossil university youtube now!
@in81872 жыл бұрын
Well you forgot to mention the dragon, that old serpent from the Bible, Genesis 3: 14, Revelation 12: 9 and Revelation 20: 2. There's a reason GOD said he will crawl on his belly for all the days of his life.
@pierre-samuelroux9364 Жыл бұрын
@@in8187..
@pierre-samuelroux9364 Жыл бұрын
@@in8187there's a reason bible not taken scientificly accurate😊
@in8187 Жыл бұрын
@pierre-samuelroux9364 only to close-minded individuals. There are many Christians who have their degrees from top institutions. Let me ask you a question: Do you believe everything you hear, or do you go and see what they say is true? Meaning dig deep for the truth.
@faizanmustafa1584 жыл бұрын
"dragons aren't real" *Sad Komodo dragon noises*
@atriox72214 жыл бұрын
Bearded dragon is actually called bearded dragon everywhere, in some places in Indonesia the Komodo dragon is just called Komodo, so rip bearded dragons everywhere
@AceofHearth4 жыл бұрын
@@atriox7221 Komodo is a place name- as in the name of the island. I doubt people call Komodo dragon as just komodo.
@567secret4 жыл бұрын
The tiny genus called "draco" is probably closer to real dragons.
@atriox72214 жыл бұрын
@@AceofHearth I am aware the island is called Komodo, but I have heard that people in that region call the Komodo dragons by Komodo and don't use the dragon part of the name, this may be wrong, could also be a small population altering the word kind of like slang. if the locals don't use the dragon part i just think a different lizards name could've been the joke, like bearded dragons.
@janssenlee32604 жыл бұрын
@@atriox7221 i'm from Indonesia. And confirm that you're right. We just call them Komodo without dragon. It's sound very weird when we add "Dragon" 😂. p. s. Dragon in Indonesian is "Naga".
@ptah9562 жыл бұрын
The Reign of Fire dragons had two-part bombardier style fire breath, four limbs, a keel, and massive wings. Really should have been on the list.
@thegoldentb75962 жыл бұрын
The ROF dragons are outrageously underrated.
@tubekulose2 жыл бұрын
True! The beast from "Dragonslayer" (1981) is a great example too.
@Just_A_Guy_Here. Жыл бұрын
I'm your 100th liker here & bye.
@analothor Жыл бұрын
so should the Wyverns of ark
@nailinthefashion Жыл бұрын
My favourite dragons, cuz they were also like a plague of rats. Really deadly, annoying ones
@gregorymckenzie75115 жыл бұрын
Humans: "Flying things need a keel to support their *HOOGE* muscles." Bats and Pterosaurs: "OH OKAY."
@shockthetoast5 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I found it hard to take this video serious when they immediately discounted a pokemon that is literally a giant bat because it somehow couldn't fly...
@VelociraptorsOfSkyrim5 жыл бұрын
1) Pterosaurs most likely had pretty big muscles in comparison to their weight. 2) Bats still have some pretty large muscles compared to their body size. And he was speaking specifically about dragons, and by extension reptiles, anyway.
@Kimikashimoo5 жыл бұрын
@@VelociraptorsOfSkyrim fun fact: "reptiles" arent really a thing. there's Lepidosauria (represented mainly by lizards, geckos and snakes), archosauria (the group represented mainly by crocs, pterodactyls, dinos and today's birds) and testudines (turtles) their relation isn't really that close and they aren't monophyletic so the group reptiles doesn't really exist same goes with fishes
@skaionex5 жыл бұрын
@@Kimikashimoo fun fact: nobody cares
@nedinnis67525 жыл бұрын
@@Kimikashimoo I knew about the reptiles, but never heard of the fish fact. I'll read up on it.
@TheNewsDepot5 жыл бұрын
Awe man, the Komodo is going to be so disappointed.
@Sarah-rf5rj5 жыл бұрын
Komodo is the OG dragon
@ZachariahMBaird5 жыл бұрын
And the bearded one.
@dirandrous76825 жыл бұрын
*K O M O D O T I ME!*
@ericsu06305 жыл бұрын
Just a lizard... Just a lizard... Just... lizard...
@dirandrous76825 жыл бұрын
A 10 foot long venomous lizard if i must add.
@jaredcristi55265 жыл бұрын
In defence of Charazard, he’s a fire and flying type not dragon type.
@kristopherblacklaw44045 жыл бұрын
The only time this has been used to defend Charizard
@Ahmadsaufi975 жыл бұрын
And the only dragon part of charizard is his claws.
@Silver198975 жыл бұрын
Jared Cristi and now we find he couldn’t even fly if he tried. Sad.
@justcommonvideos90385 жыл бұрын
Charizard X is a dragon type/flying
@mechatar10515 жыл бұрын
Yeah aint mega charizard x dragon type, and dont give me "but only in his mega form" bullshit, it is still charizard
@smc2783 жыл бұрын
For science, dragons would have an enzyme that would breakdown water in to hydrogen and oxygen in their gut. Their stomach or a separate bladder would contain the hydrogen. Hydrogen being lighter than air and highly flammable would help them fly with smaller wings and breathe fire, but the more they used the hydrogen for fire, the harder it would be for them to sustain flight until the could recoup their hydrogen supply.
@yueshijoorya6015 ай бұрын
Their cells should be full of water like all living things on Earth. That means the enzyme will constantly turn its body into gas. Bad design. Will never happen. 0/10. You suck. Dragons suck. This video sucks. Apple products suck. KZbin ads sucks. Your momma...is a good person. I suck. Black holes suck.
@chesterlai94445 ай бұрын
Think you forgot about the part where nothing can 1. Sustain that much heat 2. You need to light a fire to keep a fire, hydrogen doesn’t explode on its own. 3. Pretty sure no enzyme can break down water anyway. Science is cruel
@dadrako15813 ай бұрын
This. This. This. This is how dragons would work. It’s also why my drawings tend to keep this in mind.
@yueshijoorya6013 ай бұрын
@@smc278 Splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen takes energy. And whatever heat you'd put in to split them, is the amount of heat given off when burning hydrogen (which disperses into the surroundings more than it concentrates on the target). Inefficient. The chimera from Wrath of the Titans works best. A flammable oil that is set alight by a spark. So in the case of a classical dragon, it would spray a forceful mist of evolved venom, that is lit by clacking its ferrous tongue, as if striking a flint.
@natereath4966Ай бұрын
@@yueshijoorya601 makes a lot more sense to me, especially since that's a bit closer to how the bombardier beetle works, if I'm not mistaken
@44r0n-95 жыл бұрын
Now we know how Daenerys got north of the wall so fast. Drogon was flying at 470km/h.
@arocomisgamusclademork16035 жыл бұрын
Almost 1km per second?
@44r0n-95 жыл бұрын
@@arocomisgamusclademork1603 That would be 3600km/h
@ethantaylor83065 жыл бұрын
What? No Rathalos/Rathian? -4 limbs -A believable non-fire attack -A keel -A massive wingspan. That pretty well checks off all the boxes.
@thehiddenninja34285 жыл бұрын
Looks pretty plausible
@zerox84135 жыл бұрын
Yeah... I'm confused... Because Hungarian Horntail dragon exactly similar to Rathalos and Rathian but yet not mentioned 😅
@FENomadtrooper5 жыл бұрын
All true, but that doesn't answer the real question: WHERE'S MY DRAGONATOR?
@Aereto5 жыл бұрын
And on top of that, they do not just use their volatile fire breath (not a proper flamethrower like a Teostra, but a fireball that requires a special organ that holds hypergolic fluid that ignites in air contact), but Rathalos has venomous talons and the Rathian has venomous tail and body spikes.
@A.R.T.45 жыл бұрын
Capcom also takes real life biology into account when making monsters for monster hunter, so they did their research too
@itzflame55234 жыл бұрын
four legged dragons are just Lizards with wings Wyverns are just Dragons With no front legs
@tom-ment-Capybara4 жыл бұрын
YES
@coracorvus4 жыл бұрын
The mythological origin of dragons are serpents, not lizards
@Logan_The_GiraGoji4 жыл бұрын
Fire Wolf Girl FWG Yup👍
@oneforthegun71784 жыл бұрын
Yes
@alunaitor69574 жыл бұрын
since im welsh it made me sad that the red dragon aka the welsh dragon can never be real :(
@the_air_ocelot Жыл бұрын
You have to consider forward thrust though, too. I just watched the bit of the Harry Potter movies with the Hungarian Horntail and it actually pushes air forwards, rather than backwards, when it flies, so it would move backwards.
@browneyeofsauron124410 ай бұрын
If that is true I won't be able to unsee it or forgive you.
@AnteJuneholm5 жыл бұрын
This felt rushed. I would have liked to seen a more detailed analysis.
@culwin5 жыл бұрын
"MinuteEarth"
@catonfire50105 жыл бұрын
@@culwin um, no, we take our dragons very seriously around here
@Xrelent5 жыл бұрын
Yeah, dismissing all dragons with 6 limbs felt like a cop out. Longer to evolve ≠ physically impossible
@livid75255 жыл бұрын
About mythical creatures compared to logic? Keep dreaming hun
@culwin5 жыл бұрын
@@Xrelent #NotAll6LimbDragons
@marxiplier43225 жыл бұрын
MinuteEarth: No dragon is scientifically possible King Ghidorah: Laughs in ET
@user-td3ke9st9m5 жыл бұрын
Laughs in bidididi*
@ester1sk5 жыл бұрын
all eye santa he hanya
@laranjaghirga50585 жыл бұрын
BIDIBIDIBIDIBIDIBIDIBIDI
@tifluvsu805 жыл бұрын
*LAUGHS WITH ALPHA CALL,GRAVITY BEAMS,ON VOLCANO.*
@vincenttrigg45215 жыл бұрын
Dragons could technically evolve on another planet if they followed similar evolution but the first to evolve on land had 6 limbs.
@reaflor915 жыл бұрын
I cant believe you guys would remind me of Kiwi My heart is broken once more
@7head7metal75 жыл бұрын
Rea Flor All around me are familiar faces...
@lagle85 жыл бұрын
KIWI
@IdiotToonz5 жыл бұрын
I actually noticed that, I'm sad too
@dyanpanda78295 жыл бұрын
@@Magmafrost13 KZbin Kiwi! and you can cry with us too.
@HanoverrrFist5 жыл бұрын
@Magmafrost13 Kiwi is a cute and sad short film about the flight of a flightless bird.
@zappababe85772 жыл бұрын
I like Terry Pratchett's dragons. They were created by someone's imagination in the presence of magic. The better the person's imagination, the more realistic and elaborate was the dragon created. Twoflower was such a pure soul, he conjured up a fantastic dragon 🐉 !
@realah30012 жыл бұрын
This man must have had reptiles before
@wildcraftsw62842 жыл бұрын
In which book did this happen?
@sapateirovalentin3482 жыл бұрын
@@wildcraftsw6284 the eighth color i think
@AlexArthur942 жыл бұрын
@@wildcraftsw6284 That was in "The Colour of Magic."
@AlexArthur942 жыл бұрын
I actually read that book recently! It was hilarious!
@456MrPeople5 жыл бұрын
Minute Earth, you’re forgetting one important factor: buoyancy. If dragons can breathe fire, they have to naturally produce a flammable gas in their stomachs. Let’s assume that gas is hydrogen because there do exist bacteria that produce hydrogen as a metabolic byproduct. That hydrogen would be lighter than air so the buoyant force produced by it could be enough to offset the velocity requirements for flight.
@Fanatic_Foremem5 жыл бұрын
Saminul Haque yeah, disregarding the biggest factor of a dragon simply because there isn’t a real life example of it kindof defeats the purpose of looking into the plausibility of a fictional creatures existence. Obviously it hasn’t happened in nature, otherwise we’d be calling that creature a dragon, the whole point of the exercise is to figure out how that would work if it WAS real, and ruling out any example that’s absolutely impossible.
@deaansugee5 жыл бұрын
I'm... Amazed so many people are missing something so painfully obvious. RUMINANTS. Ask any biochemist with a brain for fantasy and they'll tell you that if dragons were real they'd absolutely have to be ruminants. Now I'll leave you to figure out why that is so.
@olymolly36375 жыл бұрын
@@deaansugee But dragons aren't herbivores... technically...
@deaansugee5 жыл бұрын
@@olymolly3637 An astute observation but we're going to have to make some compromises here... No other way around it. Omnivorous, at least.
@Fanatic_Foremem5 жыл бұрын
This video got me to look up the old mockumentry. About if dragons were real. Think it’s called.... The Last Dragon: A fanasty made real It’s surprisingly on KZbin for free, although the subtitles are about 5 seconds slow
@roset98355 жыл бұрын
Hearing that Drogon doesn’t have big enough wings, has me shook
@gatekeeping85285 жыл бұрын
Ikr and I thought that his wings were too big
@lorddinosaur98855 жыл бұрын
I too am skeptical about the conclusion of the video. The dragons look like pencils compared to their wings, in Game of Thrones. Plus, the Hungarian Horntail's wings are not really that big compared to its body. I feel like a reasonable factor for flight they could use would be mass as some of them might be too heavy to even take off.
@TheMisternono945 жыл бұрын
Take a bat, mutiply all it's dimensions by 2 (twice as long, twice as large...) and well... it won't fly... without going into complicated explanations, a good way to think of it is like when you double all dimensions of a cube its volume is actually 8 times bigger, meaning you would need to multiply the strenth needed to lift it up by 8. Another thing to take into consideration is that bat for example flap their wings really fast compared to what dragons usually do in movies, and dragons usually have a really heavy body (not covered in feathers like birds for example). So yes dragons being huge need to have gigantic wings to even have a small chance to fly for a short distance.
@roset98355 жыл бұрын
@@TheMisternono94 Yea that makes sense but his wings are SOO big, even bigger would make him even more intimidating
@kaibutsusennin5 жыл бұрын
@@roset9835 its not big enough
@Jess-pe8bq5 жыл бұрын
Not all dragons use fire though! There are dragons that use other weapons, such as Poison
@betsegg5 жыл бұрын
Komodo dragon!
@michaeldillah76005 жыл бұрын
Magical death spit
@kamatakun90555 жыл бұрын
Or hot plasma, maybe, lasers too
@NightMations5 жыл бұрын
They can spit acid too
@TimAquila5 жыл бұрын
or crystals that curse you
@NoResultFound3 жыл бұрын
I would say that the dragons in Reign of Fire are pretty realistic, which have some massive wings.
@eygon13302 жыл бұрын
YES!!
@FKyoutubeSERIOUSLY2 жыл бұрын
Reign of Fire dragons are fucking massive.
@ianamana2 ай бұрын
but they can't have just massive wings. They need to fly fast to.
@phoebeong69635 жыл бұрын
Minute Earth: Charizard is a dragon Pokémon Fans: Wait,that’s illegal
@tonyfalcon555555 жыл бұрын
I agree
@wookeattan395 жыл бұрын
*throws in a Charizardite X*
@Nekusa5 жыл бұрын
i read this joke so manytimes on almost every youtube video
@yuukovukovich99965 жыл бұрын
Galar officials: No, it actually is
@prosackmetheus54095 жыл бұрын
@@wookeattan39 Gen VI called, They want their Mega Stone back.
@b3rnardblack5 жыл бұрын
I feel like the dragons from "Reign of Fire" have been sorely overlooked here they have four limbs, a keel, a larger wingspan to body ratio than the Hungarian horntail, and even an explanation for their fire breathing
@RagingBlast2Fan5 жыл бұрын
Great movie!
@rainbowosprey16195 жыл бұрын
I second this
@Zaxares5 жыл бұрын
The Reign of Fire dragons might have been inspired by the dragons from the 1982 animated film "The Flight of Dragons" (which in turn was based on a 1979 book of the same name). In that movie, the dragons actually have fairly small wings, but the real reason behind how they can fly despite their massive size is because the dragons actually generate a lot of internal hydrogen gas (obtained from their diet), which gives them buoyancy like a blimp or dirigible. Their wings are mostly used for steering and propulsion, not to generate lift. That same hydrogen gas is what gives them their fiery breath; the gas is breathed out and ignited via an organ in the roof of their mouths that generates an electrical charge. The downside? Using up that hydrogen gas to breathe fire also robs the dragons of their lift until their bodies can generate more, so the dragons in that movie tend to use their flame breath sparingly unless truly needed (which explains why dragons didn't just roam around the countryside burning everything down willy-nilly.)
@RagingBlast2Fan5 жыл бұрын
@@Zaxares How did they come to exist? I remember in the movie that they were discovered while digging a mine or something. What is their origin story, or discovery to be more accurate.
@Zaxares5 жыл бұрын
@@RagingBlast2Fan The Reign of Fire dragons were buried (hibernating? I forget) in a mine shaft, yeah. The Flight of Dragons dragons took a different path; it says that once, magic truly existed in the world, and magical beasts like dragons and fairies and werewolves were all real. But then over time, humans started to "disbelieve", putting their faith in science and logic and reason. If there was no "reason" why something could exist, it would fade out of existence/die out. As more and more people started to turn away from the irrationality of magic and towards the logic of science, eventually the last magicians of the world banded together and created an alternate reality for all of the magical creatures to exist in, withdrawing there, and that is why we never see any magic, miracles, or strange beasts in our world anymore. Only in dreams do the two worlds occasionally touch.
@s0Iare4 жыл бұрын
In my defense of the dōv, in the elder scrolls lore it is said that it is impossible for the dragons to fly, so they use magic to fly
@ishashka4 жыл бұрын
I'd say being a magical creature is a defining aspect of dragons almost as much as flying and fire breath, so this could apply to all the other examples.
@cadend69254 жыл бұрын
@@ishashka I'd say whereas a lot of dragons are depicted as magical, it's a little hazier than calling it a defining aspect of the creature itself. On one hand, dragons like Elliot can use magic, but others like Charizard or Toothless cannot perform and aren't really associated with magic at all. I think Solare's defense is justified, since the Elder Scrolls' dragons don't just use magic to fly, they have an entire magic system built around them and also use it to resurrect, slow time, call storms and meteor showers, etc.
@EmperorRahem4 жыл бұрын
Gravity is definitely not the same on Nirn as it is on Earth. Gravity affects objects way too slowly. We'd have to study the effects of gravity and the square cube law on Nirn
@whatthefox74354 жыл бұрын
Is that mentioned in Skyrim or the Online? I think i've never heard or read that.
@EinhornBoy-qg9pm3 жыл бұрын
@@ishashka In lord of the rings there are 3 kinds of dragons. One can't fly but breathes fire, the second can fly but cannot breathe fire and the last one (which smaug is part of) can fly and breathe fire. So I think it's pretty much up to the author to define what dragons are...
@iPyromantic2 жыл бұрын
I never read the books, but as an avid fan of the How To Train Your Dragon films and shows, I feel like I should argue a few things. They actually go into detail in the special features of the second movie about how each dragon produces fire. (And in the show, Toothless' attacks are called "plasma blasts." They're more like cannon shot, damage-wise, than flames.) Hookfang has a massive wingspan and only four limbs by your qualifications. The sizes aren't necessarily easy to tell in the way they depict them visually, but all of the main dragons do have seemingly appropriately large wingspans for their bodies, or at least far larger than most would assume. Stormfly (the deadly nadder) is definitely far more birdlike than any of the others, with the most visually obvious keel, and again, only four limbs.
@argr4sh2 жыл бұрын
I also want to add that, despite the toothless being 6-limbed (which imo honestly isn't that crazy, as they very well might've come from a different ancestor seeing as the entire world is completely different) is the one I actually imagine being the closest to actually being able to fly, not only due to its relatively large wingspan. But moreover since it has been shown that these dragons actually do go at some very high speeds, justifying a smaller wingspan.
@samudralaanu3429 Жыл бұрын
Yeah. Stormfly and other Deadly Nadders or Barkthorn Nadders don't have wings in relation to their weight. However, considering the speed of a Barkthorn Nadder, they get a pass
@NBhanuPrakash-qo8zc6 ай бұрын
But Hookfang weighs 2200 pounds, 10 times the weight of the Quetzalcoatlus. He only has a 15 meter wingspan. But his ridiculous speeds could qualify. Give old Hooky some justice here, people!
@TheShankada5 ай бұрын
I personally think a timberjack could fly. Weighing 900 lbs and having a wingspan of around 90 ft it seems reasonable.
@STITCH_LOVER-h2i2 ай бұрын
Don't forget toothless has a keel petty decently sized wing and CAN BREAK THE SOUND BARRIER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Toothless would be able to fly, and the guy in the video is an idiot for putting toothless of JUST for having six limbs.
@nelsonfabianriosdeantonio62115 жыл бұрын
Charizard: looks like a dragon, breathes fire like a dragon, has wings like a dragon, tail like a dragon, horns like a dragon, but it's not a dragon.
@arocomisgamusclademork16035 жыл бұрын
Simply it's not actual Dragon DNA.
@Sle3plessNights5 жыл бұрын
Mate, they all look like dragons..
@javieralvarez27875 жыл бұрын
@@Sle3plessNights Yeah, but Charizard, without mega evolving, is not actually dragon type in Pokemon it's fire/flying type
@haruhirogrimgar60475 жыл бұрын
People have referenced this and joked about it for 20 years. Please stop, it is not funny or new information.
@SangerZonvolt5 жыл бұрын
Two words: Batesian Mimicry
@madmatt20244 жыл бұрын
The elephant or "dragon" in the room is that some of the dragons mentioned don't come from earth and therefore don't have to comply with most of those rules. Just figuring a planet with 1/2 or 1/4 of earth's gravity changes the game completely when it comes to flight.
@nargacugalover2 жыл бұрын
Ye
@anooslord6662 жыл бұрын
or if the air in which the atmosphere of the planet is made of could factor in like if it was a mostly helium atmosphere it would make flight very difficult
@skrubknight8842 жыл бұрын
i also wonder that if the dragons with more realistic proportions were scaled down in size and weight they would be more viable for flight. like say, Horntail from HP, Smaug from Hobbit, Rathalos from Monster Hunter, etc, but like the size of a mid-size dog instead.
@xandertheupriser86002 жыл бұрын
The most egregious example being the four limbs. Say that ddagons evolved from some other 6 limb bony creature ok that suddenly put a lot contenders for the rest of it but after that it mostly physics.
@Merilirem2 жыл бұрын
@@xandertheupriser8600 Make them insects.
@WishedWash5 жыл бұрын
Minute-Earth: Calls Charizard a dragon Every Pokémon fan: *IS THIS A JOKE TO YOU*
@amaledwards5 жыл бұрын
Lol
@vincenttrigg45215 жыл бұрын
Charizard X
@vincenttrigg45215 жыл бұрын
Wait nvm they showed regular charizard
@ccggenius5 жыл бұрын
I mean... it can learn Dragon Rage, Dragon Claw, etc. can't it? It's basically a bitch-ass dragon that gets it's ice vulnerability the hard way.
@WolforNuva5 жыл бұрын
Except the dragon type isn't really what makes something dragon or not. There are plenty of Dragon type pokemon that aren't really dragons, the most obvious example being Alolan Exegutor. Charazard is a winged, flying, fire breathing, horned, lizard monster; that is a dragon in everything but the typing; which is more or less likely a relic from Gen 1, where they were much pickier about handing out the dragon type.
@hobg57862 жыл бұрын
thank you so much i randomly got completely obsessed with dragons so now i need more dragon content to help feed it and this did wonders
@tadhgmcgrath14095 жыл бұрын
Your ignoring their is a prehistoric genus of fish that has 6 limbs
@AnimeShinigami135 жыл бұрын
yes but did it survive to evolve into other species is the question.
@darthrevan59765 жыл бұрын
Wow I knew about the beetle but 6 limbed fish! What are they called?
@elgatitodraven75015 жыл бұрын
but reptiles didn't evolve from them :p
@TheRedTigon5 жыл бұрын
Tadhg McGrath what was that called?
@Xrelent5 жыл бұрын
@@AnimeShinigami13 But we're talking about hypothetical evolution (of dragons)! Thus we can posit a hypothetical evolution from a 6-limbed fish.
@Velhiibl5 жыл бұрын
4 limbed dragons.. if only we a had term for those... OH YEAH WYVERNS.
@happieeyt5 жыл бұрын
Wyverns are more like birds while dragons are more like reptiles. Also some four limbed dragons use their wings as front legs, so you can’t really call those wyverns.
@cluckeryduckery2615 жыл бұрын
Aren't dragons with two wings and two hind legs called Wyrms?
@jordangarcia4655 жыл бұрын
No, dragons without legs and maybe no wings(maybe they can idk) are called wyrms since they're..Well worm-like. Probably not the actual reason but that's how I see it
MinuteEarth: All bony creatures have four limbs. Mutations: *_Laughs in evolution_*
@vincenttrigg45215 жыл бұрын
Dragons could technically evolve on another planet if they followed similar evolution but the first to evolve on land had 6 limbs.
@chromiakocosmos88885 жыл бұрын
@@vincenttrigg4521 I was talking about how cats and dogs (including us) can be born with more than one leg. In most cases it is natural chamarism, but in others it's a mutation of a gene due to bad breeding.
@fantasyhaven39005 жыл бұрын
Toothless is the best.
@chromiakocosmos88885 жыл бұрын
@@fantasyhaven3900 Definitely.
@alqaadi98585 жыл бұрын
I get the “keelesness”, and the wing length are realistic boundaries of science. But when did we let thoughts be bounded by “evolution theory”?
@Anawsomeplauge2 жыл бұрын
I was so glad to hear about the wings, so many depictions of dragons I see have wings that are too small and often don't have enough surface area to make sense
@@jurassician3725 you just made my day, i knew yi existed but not ambopteryx
@NueUzrnem4 жыл бұрын
Dragon fruit: am i a joke to you?
@movedchannels37254 жыл бұрын
@@NueUzrnem they're not reptiles. they're fruit
@jademonass29544 жыл бұрын
"a 4 legged dragon is just an iguana" **sad drake noises**
@Kr_Ma4 жыл бұрын
Sad Glaurung noices 😜
@sunnyluna50424 жыл бұрын
Ikr
@hush61494 жыл бұрын
Sad Komodo Dragon noises
@Attaxalotl4 жыл бұрын
Sad any kind of dragon noises. two legs + two wings = wyvern four legs + two wings =. actual dragon four legs + four wings = Ihavenohekin'idea
@marcovalencia1464 жыл бұрын
@@Attaxalotl dravern or the wygon
@sid12342133 жыл бұрын
I once watched a science show where they said that the dragons could produce concentrated Hydrochloric Acid in their stomach. Since they were always portrayed looting metallic treasures and eating armoured knights, there is a possibility that they could digest metal and produce Hydrogen gas. Hydrogen in the body could be the reason they could be lifted in air and they could breathe fire.
@RealRexRiplash2 жыл бұрын
Dragons: A Fantasy Made Real?
@sflux45932 жыл бұрын
That's a common misconception, dragons actually eat gold and treasure which is why they're always sitting in a big pile of it.
@Dan7132 жыл бұрын
@@sflux4593 don’t*.
@sflux45932 жыл бұрын
@@Dan713 don't what?
@Dan7132 жыл бұрын
@@sflux4593 Eat gold.
@happyhippoeaters42612 жыл бұрын
You left out the most realistic dragon, Fatalis from the monster hunter franchise.
@salvadortoscano2534 Жыл бұрын
Oh, I have yet to fight him in Iceborne. I hear he's a big boi. SwagAxe gonna go brrrrrrrrrrr :P
@leoperd34876 ай бұрын
I have a feeling there might be some better candidates to represent Monster Hunter, but I think that’s just me.
@teawrecks12435 жыл бұрын
The best dragon of all is Alolan Exeggutor.
@wadeconroy34675 жыл бұрын
@Matheus Fernandes exeggutor in Alola is grass and dragon type
@thelastcube.5 жыл бұрын
@Matheus Fernandes that is why he described it to you
@Albert_Herring5 жыл бұрын
Ancalagon the Dark...
@kyohan84325 жыл бұрын
Wahahahhahhaha so funny And some might dont get it
@Luiden5 жыл бұрын
If anyone is/was wondering what it looked like, just imagine a palm tree but instead of coconuts, it's eggs with derpy faces.
@cameronlapp93064 жыл бұрын
If you're interested in this, try to find "The Flight of Dragons" by Peter Dickinson. TLDR: hypothesises that dragons could use a hydrogen metabolism to fly like blimps, with small wings simply as controls. There's also a great movie from the 80's (same name) which talks through the basics.
@heatherheartless55322 жыл бұрын
Petes Dragon would definitely be able to fly this way
@TheRealGuywithoutaMustache4 жыл бұрын
Stealth rocks: Charizard (Is Fire and Flying): _Why do I hear boss music?_ Actual Dragon types without the Flying typing: *Tis just a flesh wound*
@humanbean99694 жыл бұрын
a fire dragon type would still take super effective damage
@frost944 жыл бұрын
Seriously? You’re here too?
@sarahstevens49314 жыл бұрын
Just a Snowflake we should be used to it at this point, shouldn’t we?
@frost944 жыл бұрын
Sarah Stevens Sigh yep. I thought I was everywhere already but this dude is just on another level
@Bee-l3i4 жыл бұрын
Why are you here too
@Zodiarche2 жыл бұрын
In games like the Monster Hunter Series, a dragon has always 6 limbs (4 legs, 2 wings) and wyvern are similar but with 4 limbs (2 legs, 2 wings). Did you researched dragons from these games aswell? Would be so interesting :D
@salvadortoscano2534 Жыл бұрын
And "dragons" are specifically *elder* dragons. They're all basically Godzilla-level threats, whereas wyverns are like oversized birds of prey that spit fire at you :D Plus use bif weapon to hit big monster. Fun times :P (Brought to you by a SwagAxe user)
@bradknightable5 жыл бұрын
"Don't want it to drag on" me not paying attention glares at my phone
@arjeanriparip79694 жыл бұрын
Him: *includes Charizard as dragon* Pokemon: he is not a dragon type, just a fire type badass
@tribiliter4 жыл бұрын
Fire and Flying
@ZWizard2.54 жыл бұрын
So true though 🤣
@unhodin4 жыл бұрын
Doesnt have to be a dragon-type to still be considered a dragon. Lance, the dragon master champion himself says so in that new Pokemon mobile game.
@flaredemon99594 жыл бұрын
@@unhodin Finally someone said it A man of culture, I see !!!
@gracefulgiant83643 жыл бұрын
Yet altaria is a dragon
@solumlupus90184 жыл бұрын
Plottwist: Dragons have 6 limbs because they are insects.
@benjaminmiller36204 жыл бұрын
If you are counting wings as limbs, insects have 10.
@Cam2Cat4 жыл бұрын
that would be the biggest plot twist I ever heard
@Oddity29944 жыл бұрын
Dragons have 7. Arms/front legs Wings Back legs Tail
@Jorji_FCS4 жыл бұрын
@@Oddity2994 Tail is not a limb. Most mammals have tails
@Oddity29944 жыл бұрын
@@Jorji_FCS in art it acts like a limb
@Christa-op6we8 ай бұрын
you always manage to cheer me up! thanks for the great video!
@johnwayne3875 жыл бұрын
-"The Best Dragon(According to SCIENCE)" -Not a single Flying Wyvern or even a flying Bird Wyvern from Monster Hunter but rather TWO pokemons *Cries in Khezu* Edit:Holy shit,thanks for the likes guys!!!
@Hyper_Drud5 жыл бұрын
Kushala Daora and Valstrax will always be the best dragons to me.
@saphiriathebluedragonknight3755 жыл бұрын
Why not anything from Monster Hunter? From what I've heard the devs do quite a bit of research into to scientific possibilities of their monsters.
@Lucivius275 жыл бұрын
@@saphiriathebluedragonknight375 Too much fanboyism on their favorite "Dragon"
@johnwayne3875 жыл бұрын
@@saphiriathebluedragonknight375 Rather than just mere fanboyism(which would probably be another lesser factor) the only monsters that could be considered for this video would be from those two categories because they are the only wyvern classes that fly(in Monster Hunter wyvern stands for lizard so you could say these two classes of monsters are the only true "dragons"[since this video treats dragons and wyverns the same]),you could also take the Elder Dragons but they aren't really that "realistic" since they are made to be basically the mythological creatures in a world where a living B-52(Bazelgeuse and Seething Bazelgeuse if you are curious) competes against a T-Rex that breaths the "Dragon Element"(Deviljho) that also competes against both the chicken version of Noivern(Yian Garuga) and a King Kong that can go Super Saiyan(Rajang) that also preys on an Elder Dragon especies which is a thunder unicorn(Kirin),so I don't really think the Elder Dragons could be considered for the video
@ryanhamilton86305 жыл бұрын
@@johnwayne387 So the rest of the wyverns on this list are ok and wyverns are dragons just like Chinese/Japanese.
@deemac34705 жыл бұрын
This guy: "Dragons dont exist" Gliding Lizard: "hold my flaps"
@NueUzrnem4 жыл бұрын
Ya man i was just thinking of it. It is the nearest and real version of dragon.
@Purr9994 жыл бұрын
Hi again kevin
@Purr9994 жыл бұрын
I saw you in another reply
@NueUzrnem4 жыл бұрын
@@Purr999 😀hi
@fawzanfawzi99934 жыл бұрын
Oh great. Another very original "Hold My Beer" comment.
@ericvilas5 жыл бұрын
The _pause_ after that pun. That was a solid 3 seconds of silence for it to sink in, even giving you time to roll your eyes. That was an _incredibly_ bold move and I love that you did that. Nice job.
@MilesToGo_5 жыл бұрын
Lol yeah they give us 3 seconds to question our lives
@Philosjutsu3 жыл бұрын
I'm a biologist and fantasy writer. Let me fact check/add my opinion this: Dragons can be sister tax starting with an ancestor of what is fairly commonly know as a coelacanth- which would give them more than 4 limbs. They can be set on a similar evolutionary path from that point, developing amniotic eggs, etc. Something we also see IRL. Dragons are often considered ancient creatures. Think crocodiles- which would fit temporally to dragons (200 million years ago). As far as firebreathing goes, you could picture something like a spitting cobra at first but also the beetle is pretty good for an idea as well. There are actually a few ways you can imagine "fire breathing". Though it might be better to say fire-spitting for the idea that comes to mind first. Simply think of pyrophoric chemicals that combusts upon the reaction. You need proper projection so compressor muscles in the dragon's head force glands to expel the liquids. The potential gasses could be from a special digestive system that retains methane in a highly concentrated/pressurized state until it's ready to go. The liquids could also be two separate liquids that being their combustion once combined. So two separate glands project the liquid, and in combination with the reacting to oxygen in the air ignite. Honestly the chemistry isn't that odd. I'll also add firebreathing might be an interesting mechanic to consider from other non-fantasy reasons. Like- what does firebreathing do for them? I'd imagine it could be used to help feed. Think like a spider turning their prey into goop. Dragons cook their food, making it easier to digest. Maybe they don't do that well with raw meat. :) I'd also imagine it'd be used for mating practices. Little displays of fire while flying to find a mate or scare off competitors. As far as flight, I wonder about your calculations. There are also things to consider like sustained flight and speed, how loud of flight, aerodynamics, gasses accumulated pre-flight ... flight gets complicated. You can factor bone structure being different in dragons. Not like lizards but more like birds, with lighter bones and more gasses to make it lighter. For your project, I'd have at least scaled the wings to fit my formula. Finally, the four limbed dragon (wings included) would definitely be better at flight. Perhaps in your fantasy world, that's what separates wyverns vs drakes.
@danabinghammclaughlin9195 жыл бұрын
*the flightless dragons in the crowd are VERY offended.*
@Battleship0095 жыл бұрын
Don't forget ones that don't have a breathe weapon.
@zedeighty5 жыл бұрын
Yeah! Where are my wyrms at?
@azazelreeds5 жыл бұрын
You think they're offended? The water dragons weren't even mentioned! The Leviathan is furious!
@hcox55955 жыл бұрын
And the lindworms
@danabinghammclaughlin9195 жыл бұрын
@@azazelreeds Oh wow, you're right! Poor dragons
@TortoiseBlaster5 жыл бұрын
Dragonite: Fat Dragon Charizard: Technically not a Dragon Gyarados: Technically not a Dragon
@arocomisgamusclademork16035 жыл бұрын
Judgement for Design only?
@aaronolson67365 жыл бұрын
By design, they are all Dragons. 1 is Dragon-Type but that doesn't mean the others aren't dragons.
@TortoiseBlaster5 жыл бұрын
@@aaronolson6736 it's a joke. And I said technically besides
@arocomisgamusclademork16035 жыл бұрын
@@aaronolson6736 Correct. Many Dragon type Pokémon aren't classified as Dragon species. Just much magical type of Pokémon.
@arocomisgamusclademork16035 жыл бұрын
@@TortoiseBlaster what joke? Many people spam comment Charizard isn't Dragon type Pokemon.
@Laurensvm5 жыл бұрын
Aren't the 2 legged 'dragons' actually called wyvern?
@loc47255 жыл бұрын
Yes, they are (usually) considered a different species, just like wingless dragons are called lizzards.
I totally understand that none of the dragon’s wings are big enough. However, they could’ve served a different purpose in life. Wings, although primary built for flight, don’t need to be just for flight. Penguins use theirs for swimming, some animals use them for display and communication. The possibilities are endless.
@GabAnimates6494 жыл бұрын
Video: ender dragons aren't realistic because it has 6 limbs me: "download 4 limb dragon texture pack" Also me: really?
@squibble3114 жыл бұрын
hehehehhehehehhehehehheh
@TankEngine_124 жыл бұрын
Lol
@purpal_theanimator93094 жыл бұрын
Ahh makes sense
@lemonnade46174 жыл бұрын
Me: download relistic calculated dragons mod
@anonymousstout47595 жыл бұрын
1:34 "Eastern dragon is basically lizard" whole China would love to talk about Kung Fu with you
@zionthedragon88665 жыл бұрын
Yeah, it's more of a snake with stubby limbs, and a few animal parts, and floats like a balloon.
@Ricardowieringa5 жыл бұрын
Zion The Dragon so like a skink with fur and horns
@zionthedragon88665 жыл бұрын
@@Ricardowieringa yep.
@aster33805 жыл бұрын
Knocks out all wingless (all eastern) dragons cos magic isn't real, yet a firebreathing dragon is top... At least say most realistic winged dragon if you wanted to focus on wings so much!
@zionthedragon88665 жыл бұрын
@@aster3380 you mean winged four limbs only "Dragon".
@Rubyshc5 жыл бұрын
Title: the best dragon Thumbnail: the most realistic dragon Me: *CONFUSED SCREAMING*
@thehiddenninja34285 жыл бұрын
Video: Most realistic What the title means is "the best representation"
@curseofgladstone49815 жыл бұрын
@@thehiddenninja3428 Of what a dragon would realisticlly be like and not even what it theoretically could be. (non 4 limbed but still large enough wing size. Don't know why they made that the first hurdle)
@thehiddenninja34285 жыл бұрын
@@curseofgladstone4981 Because these dragons exist on earth. And all vertebrates on land have 4 limbs. And dragons are vertebrates. The question is which dragon is most likely to have possibly evolved on earth. And I think the answer is mega-salamance: 4 limbs, 1 giant wing that is not a limb, so doesn't need a keel, that can be used for gliding, and lizards that glide in air are literally real. Salamance is literally a dragon that's literally just a big version of an animal that already exists.
@IshantAcharya-k3w2 ай бұрын
This was the first minuteearth video I had ever watched.
@junsantiago55425 жыл бұрын
"Dragons from the eastern world with no wings are lizards" East Dragon: AM I A JOKE TO YOU?!?!?!
@mohawk47595 жыл бұрын
jun santiago or drakes
@FortunePathVenerable5 жыл бұрын
They said western but ok
@ChaosPod5 жыл бұрын
No, he said dragons with no wings and no magical flight are just lizards. Eastern dragons fly on clouds.
@teawrecks12435 жыл бұрын
komodo dragons lmaoo
@aidanjanemcintosh69195 жыл бұрын
I CALL YOU O SHENRON-SAMA!!!
@ydnaslounge36515 жыл бұрын
We all clicked on this to say “charizard isn’t a dragon” didn’t we
@oddgodd25605 жыл бұрын
Nope. It is a dragon. It isn't dragon type. But it is a dragon
@shodai20545 жыл бұрын
YdnasLounge *screams in mega x*
@LyfSukz5 жыл бұрын
I really did lol
@tkamhara5 жыл бұрын
yes
@Nikita.J-servantofgod5 жыл бұрын
Mudfossil university youtube now!
@rysloth795 жыл бұрын
The closest thing to a dragon is shooting boiling water to burn its prey *Laughs in scauldron*
@MAK3L_5 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@exabyte6865 жыл бұрын
Through its butt
@sunnicivang10932 жыл бұрын
My defense for 4 limbs and 2 wings are that the wings aren't limbs in the normal sense, but instead hugely evolved/mutated skeletal shoulder blades; call it "false limbs" just like a panda has a false thumb which is actually its wrist bone.
@Cheez_yus2 жыл бұрын
Didn't wings come from arms?
@flysoup36072 жыл бұрын
@@Cheez_yus Insect wings don't seem to have but every other wing has
@Cheez_yus2 жыл бұрын
@@flysoup3607 Yeah I was talking about the vertebrate's wings
@TheTrueSpyroManRemixes5 жыл бұрын
I love how the best dragon is technically a wyvern.
@arocomisgamusclademork16035 жыл бұрын
Lacking battle.
@Renagale5 жыл бұрын
its not the best dragon is a wyvern for it to even have a chance of being the best dragon it has to be a wyvern the moment he said it cant have 6 limbs there is no longer a most realistic dragon.
@arocomisgamusclademork16035 жыл бұрын
@@Renagale what about Eragon? That show is live action movie. Second, is that why live action Filmmakers don't want 6 limbs dragon in the show instead 3d animation and 2d animation?
@arocomisgamusclademork16035 жыл бұрын
@Melkhiordarkblade expect lack.
@andrewhrusovsky94265 жыл бұрын
@Melkhiordarkblade Ok, BOOMER
@Praisethesunson4 жыл бұрын
Komodo Dragon: Am I a joke to you?
@MeelisMatt4 жыл бұрын
or Bruce Lee
@b00tt3r_54 жыл бұрын
Yest you are
@suratmansuratman91464 жыл бұрын
Yes, because here in indonesia we just call them "komodo" instead of "komodo dragon"
@jaschabull23654 жыл бұрын
Bearded Dragon: *crying in corner*
@kirara25165 жыл бұрын
Toothless wins. He's like a horse, a kitten and a dog all wrapped into one.
@naceandrea6865 жыл бұрын
whilst looking like an Axolotl
@PhoenixKnight7775 жыл бұрын
Damn science, he wins no matter what!
@GeoEstes5 жыл бұрын
Except neither horses, kittens, nor dogs can fly or breath fire.
@gordonfreeman73205 жыл бұрын
kirara2516 Book version is superior lol
@kirara25165 жыл бұрын
@@gordonfreeman7320 but.... you cant ride the book version. He's cat-sized, right? I'll stick with the movie version, thanks
@tonynewton99722 жыл бұрын
Great vid, made me subscribe... keep it up guys
@michaelwintermantel91274 жыл бұрын
I would love to know how weight was calculated. Ideally, a dragon would have adaptations to make itself lighter so that it can support its weight with non-clumsy wings. Examples of this might be hollow bones, reduction in fat storage, potentially a reduction in brain size, and (idk if this is possible) ways to reduce muscle weight without compromising much on strength. Just some ideas, mostly based on bird biology.
@FlyingHangman Жыл бұрын
I remember watching a BBC pseudodocumentary years ago that suggested they had a sack of hydrogen in their chest/stomach to help them reduce their weight, and they could regurgitate their stomach to lighten themselves also. The trade-off was, if they used too much of their hydrogen to breathe fire, they couldn't get off the ground... which apparently medieval knights figured out and was the reason they were hunted to extinction. It was actually a really well done film, making it almost like Walking With Dinosaurs
@syberfrost77315 жыл бұрын
Hold on where’s rathalos doesn’t he count since he is a wyvern
@someone-yv1bq5 жыл бұрын
Ya he disqualified all the real dragons at the very first
@VelociraptorsOfSkyrim5 жыл бұрын
@@someone-yv1bq Uh, no. In actual Mythology, there is no concrete definition of Dragon. Chinese Dragons only have four limbs and no wings at all. Dragons from North America are serpentine with feathery wings and no legs at all. How you classify a dragon is entirely dependent on the world it originates from. For example: In a Song of Ice and Fire (Game of Thrones) The only difference between a Dragon and a Wyvern is that Wyverns cannot breathe fire. In the Elder Scrolls universe, the Dragons don't even call themselves dragons, their true name are the Dov, it was the puny mortals that called them dragons.
@alexgray21105 жыл бұрын
Technically, all draconic creatures have different names and could all be considered dragons. Like the six limbed dragon is also considered a western dragon, and a dragon with four limbs and no wings is a drake, eastern dragons that fly without wings, etc. Personally I would refer to them with the more specific term that applies, but yeah it’s not wrong to call them all dragons
@Vinigomez5 жыл бұрын
Lol all the "dragons" that made over the bottom are "wyverns" bcz they r 4 limbed
@VelociraptorsOfSkyrim5 жыл бұрын
@@alexgray2110 Well, yeah, I feel like there should be exact definitions, but calling a Wyvern "not a dragon" wouldn't be accurate. Like, Dragons would be a term for the full group (Like Dinosaur) but specific types divided into regions and such.
@prosackmetheus54095 жыл бұрын
"We _could_ just remove the wings, but without a magical flight ability, they'd just be regular Lizards..." *Cries in Drake*
@EclipsethexplorerdragonАй бұрын
2:04 Making me remember of animation named “Kiwi!” made 14 years ago..
@AverageMiner5 жыл бұрын
No “Reign of Fire?” I know it’s an overlooked movie but the dragons in that follow all traits listed to a near T.
@shadowphoenix16965 жыл бұрын
I know right, still hands down the best dragon design. I mean literally nearly ever western movie/TV show has had there dragons based around that design since the film came out, weather they know it or not.
@masacross85515 жыл бұрын
AverageMiner Finally, someone who knows about it!
@steeleplays6695 жыл бұрын
It is still to this day the best dragon movie I've seen. I think they even went into detail how it would be possible for it to breath fire.
@Altron19925 жыл бұрын
Best Matt McConaughey movie ever.
@VelociraptorsOfSkyrim5 жыл бұрын
Just based on the size of the wings of the dragons in that movie, they'd be a great contender for the top spot.
@gwuhwhuh62485 жыл бұрын
why didn’t you look at monster hunter wyverns? They’re literally designed to be realistic
@Brendanvideos5 жыл бұрын
Because dauntless Is a better game ;)
@slimjimoil935 жыл бұрын
@@Brendanvideos no
@blackbird77815 жыл бұрын
I was wondering why they didnt look at monster hunter
@John_Carbajal5 жыл бұрын
Glad someone addressed this
@MCH-23.Quintus5 жыл бұрын
@@Brendanvideos Said no one ever.
@coracorvus4 жыл бұрын
1:34 "That's basically just a lizard." Glaurung: "Am I a joke to you?"
@ghostbucket3 жыл бұрын
Glaurung= giant angry stinky hypno-komodo dragon
@ghostbucket3 жыл бұрын
@philipp ii. Worm or wyrm is an archaic term for dragon. It doesn't normally refer to an earthworm.
@ghostbucket3 жыл бұрын
I prefer wyrm to cut down on confusion
@Amanecer4582 жыл бұрын
Kirins
@Dausuul2 жыл бұрын
There are quite a few fictional dragons that don't breathe fire, and thus trounce all other competitors in the first tier. Tolkien's cold-drakes, for example.
@attifiet5 жыл бұрын
Dragons may not be real. But one thing we know for sure: A dragon is not a slave.
@lea35985 жыл бұрын
Yeah, but a wyvern could be
@sergiovela76865 жыл бұрын
Dracarys!
@CricketTheHivewing5 жыл бұрын
Elder Fire u have a Qibli pfp, noice
@nova_vista5 жыл бұрын
except when it wants to be :3
@pivtriv55295 жыл бұрын
I got your 100th like
@EspeonMistress005 жыл бұрын
The amount of pop culture references in this is not helping my hyperactive brain. This is my favourite MinuteEarth video. 😘
@zyibesixdouze48635 жыл бұрын
"4-limbed dragons" Just say wyvern it hurts
@loc47255 жыл бұрын
I'm guessing they didn't research this very well. Also no mention of the movie "Flight of Dragons", which covers the same topic.
@tochinomasuta46005 жыл бұрын
@@loc4725 Wyverns are completely different from Dragons, God the Two leg shit has to stop, I'm sick of everyone thinking just because it lacks 6 limbs its a Wyvern, its dumb
@xkilla9115 жыл бұрын
@@tochinomasuta4600 Wyverns are dragons
@tochinomasuta46005 жыл бұрын
@@xkilla911 Wyverns are a class, they lack fire and have a stinger tail usually, they use venom instead
@j2dragon1095 жыл бұрын
The whole wyvern mess is what really hurts.
@FirstLieutenantOli Жыл бұрын
if typhomerang from httyd didn't breath fire it could actually exist. they have large enough keel, large wings and flight speed enough to fly and they are light enough to actually stay in the air
@rinkarako5 жыл бұрын
I say toothless is the most plausible. RIP TOOTHLESS he didnt even make it halfway..
@DPAE-xc4ph5 жыл бұрын
I think a young Drogon is the most realistic, when it was the size of a goat or smaller. Toothless is unlikely because he has four legs. Chest muscles can't control four major limbs, independently, at once. Plus, his wings are too small.
@VelociraptorsOfSkyrim5 жыл бұрын
@@unused3402 A Wyvern is still a dragon.
@python19725 жыл бұрын
Toothless may not have made it, but Stormfly has a chance.
@essencereaver74595 жыл бұрын
About the fire breathing factor, I always had this idea since highschool: Dragons exhale flammable gas, and thier teeth are like flint and steel.
@Hyper_Drud5 жыл бұрын
Like the Zippleback from How to Train Your Dragon. One head spews a flammable gas and the other ignites it with sparks.
@LordVader10945 жыл бұрын
@@Hyper_Drud The question is how the hell the other head creates sparks. Lol
@Hyper_Drud5 жыл бұрын
LordVader1094 breathes the sparks I guess. It’d make more sense if it gnashed its teeth to ignite the gas like Teostra from Monster Hunter.
@dinow2695 жыл бұрын
Watch The Last Dragon: A Fantasy Made Real. It's a docufiction that treats that as the way dragons breathe fire
@reanetsemoleleki82195 жыл бұрын
Flint requires friction to spark. Dragons usually have their moths wide open when they breath fire.
@zoharnakash73615 жыл бұрын
Love the Todd Howard with the arrow in the knee little detail 1:02
@sovietmarshmallow12835 жыл бұрын
I think your are the 69th comment!Cool
@zoharnakash73615 жыл бұрын
@@sovietmarshmallow1283 Niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice
@xSuperSS5 жыл бұрын
@DeSPoTNemanjaS It's nonut november so give them some slack xD
@matthewvanburen64155 жыл бұрын
"It just works,"
@HailNeatoBurrito5 жыл бұрын
*"It Just Works"*
@crimsonraen8 ай бұрын
This is a great video! :)
@WyWinner304 жыл бұрын
TFW the most realistic dragon is a wyvern
@doragonzx3 жыл бұрын
No its reign of fire bull dragon but they did not included him into the list
@NathanHorton-yq4uj3 жыл бұрын
@@doragonzx The reign of fire dragons are wyverns
@doragonzx3 жыл бұрын
@@NathanHorton-yq4uj this is biais since half of this liste f Dragon are wyverns
@checkyourwall3 жыл бұрын
I like wyvern better than dragons
@NathanHorton-yq4uj3 жыл бұрын
@@doragonzx But the most realistic ones are wyverns
@eminkilicaslan89453 жыл бұрын
"Which of these famous fantasy dragons has the best shot to be more than just a fantasy." Ah yes, Ender Dragon.
@ilovethelight7773 жыл бұрын
Well Minecraft isn't technically real, so it counts.
@eclecticsoffy3 жыл бұрын
Ah yes, a dragon that breathes magical fire (according to the death message of the Ender Dragon's breath) and lives in another dimension is the best candidate for a realistic dragon
@eminkilicaslan89453 жыл бұрын
@@eclecticsoffy Sure... and another small detail, she's pixelated.
@eclecticsoffy3 жыл бұрын
@@eminkilicaslan8945 I decided not to include that detail because if Ender Dragons are real, they'd probably not be pixelated
@toxicdino86763 жыл бұрын
@@eclecticsoffy if somehow the first fish divided into two, one is a tetrapod and the other is a hexapod, if four legged, two winged dragons existed, are their bodies just as mechanically possible (like would it make sense?) as wyverns? And are the reasons for a six limbed dragon not being able to fly the same as for a wyvern if they are the same size?
@LordHayabusa855 жыл бұрын
FOOLS! Have you never watched the Discovery Channel Documentary “Dragons: A Fantasy Made Real”? They explain the science of the Fire Breath, the Flight and the Six Limbs.
@Doralga5 жыл бұрын
Thought I was the only one who remember that show also theirs about a dozen bunch of creatures that emit pyrosis he found one bug huh
@satrioekowicaksono74525 жыл бұрын
What do you expect? Minute earth is more entertainment than science.
@anthonyanderson34485 жыл бұрын
@@satrioekowicaksono7452 but they want to bring in science.
@fleeplayTV5 жыл бұрын
@@Doralga what's the proper term to look up this information I tried to put pyrosis and all I got was some sort of nasty rash.
@Doralga5 жыл бұрын
@@fleeplayTV look up the ability to emit flame apparently the internet confuses pyrosis with a moth species of the same name and the one you got was the term (name escapes me) is type of cells that activate in the presence of extreme heating source i.e being burned but it overload with white cells causing extreme swelling
@gabrielh154113 күн бұрын
Part two PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE 🙏🏽
@Cp-715 жыл бұрын
I remember when my younger cousin asked me to draw a dragon. I thought out and drew one with its biological niche in mind and included a data sheet with its habitat, adaptation to it, behaviour, mating, and life cycle. As you can imagine, my cousin was pretty confused. Edit: I finally got a picture (I drew it in his notebook so I don't have it physically), here it is! cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/448016617360850946/744910368488423468/Dragon.jpg
@Jinxed_stunts4 жыл бұрын
Random question do you have a picture of that?
@Cp-714 жыл бұрын
@@Jinxed_stunts Unfortunately, no. I drew it in his notebook, so I don't have it in any way :( I was going to ask him for a photo though.
@UmbraMG4 жыл бұрын
@@Cp-71 any photo yet?
@Cp-714 жыл бұрын
@@UmbraMG I can't meet him because of the quarantine - I will do it as soon as I can
@CHO-zq2os4 жыл бұрын
If you do post the photo, please tag me. You've piqued my interest 🙂
@Buglin_Burger78785 жыл бұрын
What interests me about this, is in part the limitations we apply because of what we assume despite the fact it spits on things we know. Yet when you look at more common things (The entire how do bees fly.) Hot Air Balloons unravel the problem almost instantly. How do they function? All the dragon then needs is a way to re-create this. Animals have shown the ability to create boiling hot liquids and gases there in we get the loop we need to say based on science... it is possible via even a spark which is also possible since some creatures eat rocks so a dragon could even eat some to ignite stuff... like the rocks from their cave. That being said, everything coming from the fish, while nice and all doesn't stop something from getting 6 limbs via evolution. Insects should be considered non-existent except they aren't. Since we know genetic information exists... what is to stop natural evolution via a random mutation? If it is stable and dominant and the bearers survive... then in turn... You can argue based on science something shouldn't exist by stating it isn't impossible, not that creatures don't have that trait. There is nothing that is the exact same as a human so they can't exist... isn't logic. What we know about science often isn't reality but the reality we observe... which is constantly changing and being improved on as we observe more and more... while we know there are no 6 limbed mammals we have observed mutations which make more limbs possible. We only assume it is impossible because we don't actively have that trait but we scientifically don't have proof just what we see. Yet I have never seen anyone win the lottery so no one ever wins it. On science, we don't really have any counter points as there are gaps in flight that allow for a fire breathing entity to create that gap.
@rockybalboa19294 жыл бұрын
I love u...
@akhilvijendra20184 жыл бұрын
Hot air balloons aren't made of muscle tissue
@puppyplanet3004 жыл бұрын
Well said
@williamarcilla20174 жыл бұрын
Like meatlug
@BronyTimeProductions5 жыл бұрын
A better title would be "The Most Realistic Dragon (according to science)" While I enjoyed the video I felt a little misled.
@loremipsum22375 жыл бұрын
No it should be most realistic dragon according to Earth's rules and evolutionary process and we ignore a 6 limbed creature could exist is a bunch of mutations occurred and it turned out 6 limbs was better
@Antimatter_ray5 жыл бұрын
@@loremipsum2237 and change it to current earth rules since the rules change depending on the atmosphere (such as pre great oxygen catastrophe)
@MacElMasMancoDeTodos Жыл бұрын
Play some Minecraft and you'll see the Enderdragon doesn't fly, she levitates T-posing around the pillars doing the loudest noises your ears can stand
@limediamond45955 жыл бұрын
Ender Dragon: *gets stuck in the bottom tier* *Steve had never seen such bull***** *before*
@Sebby-oz3ve5 жыл бұрын
Yea , it only has 2 limbs anyway ...
@Titanic-wo6bq5 жыл бұрын
IKR!? Four legs seems like it would be better at stability!
@mateuszodrzywoek86585 жыл бұрын
Its realistic
@Cpt_John_Price5 жыл бұрын
*bullshit
@maxelleasgadrah39745 жыл бұрын
It’s from a dimension that is completely different
@Doylgaafs95 жыл бұрын
MinuteEarth: Searching for the most realistic dragon Also MinuteEarth: Rejects all the dragons and leaves only Wyverns after first round.
@rainbowmothraleo5 жыл бұрын
WYWERNS ARE DRAGONS!!
@eddiehunter18875 жыл бұрын
Wyverns arn’t dragons, they are wyverns, true dragons have 4 legs and 2 wings
@Equeon5 жыл бұрын
Doylgaafs: clearly passionate about dragons Also Doylgaafs: uses pop culture terminology that isn't even universally accurate to classify a mythical creature
@eduardolarrymarinsilva765 жыл бұрын
@@Equeon To be fair, conflicts like that are common amongst biologists.
@rainbowmothraleo5 жыл бұрын
@@eddiehunter1887 and that's the reason why most of Medieval age's Bestyars depicts dragons vs two legs
@deathwingthedestroyer36325 жыл бұрын
You forgot Ghidorah he’s now the most famous dragon Then yet again his entire existence defies everything we know
@josetolentino39655 жыл бұрын
Ghidorah weighs over 140000 metric tons, and has a wingspan of probably over 300 meters. Its arms/wings are clearly strong enough to support ghidorah's fat ass in a quadrupedal stance, not to mention, the flap of its wings is said to provoke hurricane winds. Given the fact that he's alien and most likely not carbon based like any creature on earth, so his composition could be different to what we've seen... yes. I think its safe to say Ghidorah can fly like he does in KOTM
@arocomisgamusclademork16035 жыл бұрын
@@josetolentino3965 not a Dragon?
@ajitivanmontemusahari36255 жыл бұрын
He's an Alien
@deathwingthedestroyer36325 жыл бұрын
Jose Tolentino Dragon like alien, better?
@arocomisgamusclademork16035 жыл бұрын
@@deathwingthedestroyer3632 not quite. Because it's not mix parts. Just look like Hyvern.
@thesaucylorax2 жыл бұрын
What about adolescent Drogon/Viserion/Rhaegal? When they're as big as a horse? Or the in between? Would any of those be realistic if you ignore how big they grow? What about other dragons, like if you kept similar proportions how small would you have to make it so that it can realistically fly
@Sandro_de_Vega4 жыл бұрын
Years ago, the discovery channel released a paradocument about the theoretical discovery of dragon remains frozen in the Czech Giant Mountains. For this purpose, they have come up with a solution to ALL the problems that you outclass dragons with. For example, the question of flight. The dragon's body was too big and heavy for its wingspan. But the third lung was "found" in his body. In which hydrogen accumulated as a by-product of digestion. This lung would reduce the weight of the dragon if it were full. It also played a part in breathing fire. This hydrogen was supposed to fuel the dragon's breath. Where does the ignition come from? From the spark that was created from the pieces of metal found in the teeth of the dragon (not the metal of the armor of the knights but of the ores in the ground) The corollary was that the dragon, which had used up all the hydrogen on the breath, could not fly for some time. And I'm pretty sure someone bit the same topic. I just don't remember if it was a movie, series or something else. The limb issue may be the result of a mutation. The 6 limbs make survival much easier. Because, for example, it allows you to fight in the air, or a diving attack without engaging the mouth or depriving yourself of the ability to quickly withdraw.
@sirpdubs4 жыл бұрын
A third lung filled with hydrogen would make literally no difference to the flight capabilities. Imagine a small balloon filled with helium inside of you. When you step on a scale your weight would be nearly the exact same as without it. Helium is twice heavy as hydrogen, but it would still be an imperceptibly small difference in weight.
@Sandro_de_Vega2 жыл бұрын
@@overhyped7439 Don't demean random people down to your own level. Just because reading is difficult for you, doesn't mean that everyone has that problem.
@InquisitorBoomBoom2 жыл бұрын
Yo, I saw that movie(?) and I thought it was real back when I'm just a kid.
@brandonvandegrift47292 жыл бұрын
That sounds very much Like the same information that was mentioned in the movie “The Flight of Dragons”.
@Designsmile2 жыл бұрын
bad quality, but it's this one I believe watch?v=NYY5ksNCjCY
@joebc714FTW5 жыл бұрын
Question, how did the movie Dragons: A Fantasy Made Real, do in explaining dragons in a scientific way?
@Adam-cq2yo5 жыл бұрын
Oh man, I remember that movie. Love it.
@mrslinkydragon99105 жыл бұрын
Actually rather well
@whathell6t5 жыл бұрын
joebc714 Okay! How would you explain King Ghidorah, a dragon from science fiction genre?
@tyberostheredwake80985 жыл бұрын
A second set of lungs to store hydrogen to make them lighter. Doubles as fuel for their fire breath. Don't remember where they get the hydrogen from.
@manospondylus5 жыл бұрын
Johny Marcial Ghidorah is an alien that looks like a dragon, not a real dragon
@imjustahuman92525 жыл бұрын
The most realistic dragon is... a wyvern. Thats what they said
@kamzalot35 жыл бұрын
Exactly
@HUNKragor5 жыл бұрын
Finally someone said it
@peeblekitty57805 жыл бұрын
A wyvern is a type of the overarching title of "dragon", exceptions are lore-specific. Sick of this nitpick
@WildArmACF5 жыл бұрын
Rathalos for the win
@danieltrujeque51845 жыл бұрын
@@peeblekitty5780 wyvern: a flying dragon like creature that of which has 4 limbs two of which are more closely resembling of a bat. Long story short a dragon has 6 limbs consisting of 4 legs and 2 wings with no claw like appendages protruding from out of the tip of the wing.