The best feature every framework needs

#javascript #typescript #react #qwik

[@doyouwantsli9680]

This is the worst idea I have seen in a while.

[@arshiagholami7611]

literally nextjs has the same thing but way more complicated to setup

[@arshiagholami7611]

this is Qwik btw

[@m12652]

Isn't this just a massive vulnerability waiting to happen? Could be bigger than internet Explorer 😳

[@doyouwantsli9680]

@@m12652 yeah pretty much.

[@rexfng]

Why?

[@Hacking-Kitten]

or just setup cors correctly??

[@yassinesafraoui]

Sometimes you can't if the api doesn't allow your website in the response headers, it's what happens when web scraping and that's one of the reasons it has to be on the server

[@justanaveragebalkan]

That requires thinking jabascript developers don't think.

[@louisant1817]

@@yassinesafraoui When do you ever make a POST request to something that doesn't belong to you ?

[@yassinesafraoui]

@@louisant1817 when doing web scraping for example

[@januariopinto_]

Isn't this basically use server in nextjs? 🤔

[@Kampouse]

no cause its ran inside of a handler and not on and server component only work without js

[@cyberkrypts]

​@@Kampouse you can trigger server action from client components and treat them like normal async functions

[@Martin-kt8sz]

this architecture makes literally no sense

[@aresstavropoulos916]

You wouldn’t build large scale apps with this thought right? I mean server/client management would be so difficult when you don’t have clearly defined endpoints forvthe client to talk to

[@82TheKnocKY]

I mean with this architecture you don't need to have neatly defined endpoints

[@PraiseYeezus]

...what about this makes it more difficult inherently?

[@aresstavropoulos916]

@@PraiseYeezus If you want to change how you use endpoints on the server, are you not just screwed? Adding logging, authentication would all be difficult to integrate, and there's no one location to view your endpoints, so certain endpoints can be unneccesarily redundant

[@PraiseYeezus]

@@aresstavropoulos916 how would it be difficult to integrate? the code you use for logging would go into the server action. such functions are meant for POST requests like submitting to a DB directly

[@landsman737]

but the syntax, and readability of the code in this example is bad for me

[@engageintellect]

Maybe I’m just used to Sveltekit. But it makes more sense to me to create an API route that runs on the server and then fetch from the client.

[@StCost]

on nextjs I made single [...slug].ts API file catching any request and proxying it to real backend

[@erickmoya1401]

Please no. Mixing everything like it doesnt matter makes it worse.

[@biiiiiimm]

Mhhh i am now used to next server actions, i don't really feel that it mix everything. And its much simpler, same feature at same place

[@brawlrob0]

​@@biiiiiimmserver actions are different from qwik

[@rexfng]

Mixing what together? Ajax call in the frontend by the same server. Server side would need to setup cors or whitelist you. The underlying stuff don't change. I think this demonstrate how easy it is to wrap your code to be code with your server instead of client side

[@bradyfractal6653]

Sveltekit server files is the best model I’ve found for readability, clarity, consistency, and ease of use. This pattern here would to easily create such a spaghettified minefield in large codebase. Nice for a super small personal project though.

[@m12652]

Agreed...

[@AndrewFloatrx]

nextjs server actions 😊

[@sirkato7751]

Am I the only one that thinks that a template and a double server call is a bad idea?

No sir please give up this shitty architecture , my eyes and ears are bleeding 😢

[@danteDeveloper]

Is this adding proxy somewhere in runtime?

[@justanaveragebalkan]

I am almost sure now that this is a meme account, trying to figure out which bad take becomes popular so it can become the next react.

[@chrikke]

Fuck React, me and my homies love HTMX or Sveltekit

[@otis3744]

Power feature, a lot of junior devs are about to mess up prod with this one

[@fueledbycoffee583]

inlining an api call is hurting my eyes so bad

[@thedelanyo]

Sveltekit makes more awesome

[@bereketsiyum74]

Server actions ?

[@chacs3801]

Only for guys that only can JavaScript

[@akshayrajput3875]

in svelte?

[@troooooper100]

I'm starting to think frontend devs are ill.. they want to write HTML CSS in JavaScript and now backend too lololol

[@kcin4206]

oh dear god no..

[@letsthinkforamoment8904]

What do you mean "run this on the server?"

[@FirstYokai]

Most of the time you don't need a framework. Pick a language and make a server side website with templates. That's so easy and fast

[@hamn_n1483]

Qwik being Qwik

[@chawkichalladia1812]

What are you smoking 😅

[@Miles-co5xm]

Best way to get your server fucked up

[@MegaTeckguy]

Eww

[@hasithapriyasad]

This make no sense

[@griffin8062]

WHY!?!?!

[@AlmightyPyro]

no

[@IStMl]

yeah no wtf

[@pythagoran]

Oooh I have a better idea for a feature missing from most frameworks... _remove the framework_ 🤯

[@npanuhin]

Don't use frameworks, use pure JavaScript, it's much easier

[@pituboy]

Terrible.....