The BIGGEST Disbelief about IVERMECTIN and COVID

The BIGGEST Disbelief about IVERMECTIN and COVID
Ivermectin is used to treat head lice and certain parasitic infections.
But for COVID?
The WHO, CDC, FDA, and IDSA say it should not be used for COVID.
UNLESS it's in a clinical trial.
But that didn’t stop this guy, who chose ivermectin over the vaccine. Captain Joe Manning, 57, A Georgia police officer who frequently posted anti-vax messages on Facebook, died of COVID.
Why would some people want a drug that is not FDA approved for COVID?
Because it has not been proven to be effective and has not been proven to be safe.
Why would someone choose that over something that has been proven safe and effective in preventing COVID?
---------------------------------------------------------
Doctor Mike Hansen's Programs ⏩
FULL Course for MORE ENERGY:
learn.doctormikehansen.com/pr...
FREE Course for MORE ENERGY:
doctormikehansen.com/6-days-t...
---------------------------------------------------------
Dexamethasone video:
• Dexamethasone for COVI...
Well, we do kind of have that with dexamethasone. AKA decadron, which is a steroid that is very similar to prednisone. It’s the one drug with the most solid evidence for reducing the severity of COVID illness, including reducing mortality. And it's cheap too. But it's not a miracle drug.
So how do we know if ivermectin
1) works
2) if so, what dose is required for it to work
3) is that dose safe for ingestion???
The ivermectin hype train left the station back in April of 2020.
It all started with this study that looked at the virus in a test tube when scientists suffocated it with massive doses of ivermectin.
And surprise, surprise, guess what the results showed?
There was a major drop in viral replication. And that’s great, right? It’s a starting point. It's saying, hey, we might have something here. But there's a problem. The inhibitory concentration of the drug, around 2.5 micromolar, is not achievable in real live humans. In fact, standard ivermectin dosing achieves blood concentrations of about 25 nanomolar, 100-fold less than needed in vitro. Lung concentrations are slightly higher than blood concentrations but still 50-fold less than what is needed to inhibit the virus in cells in culture.
But ok, maybe it works not necessarily by inhibiting viral replication; maybe it can help suppress inflammation from COVID.So you start doing some observational studies. Observational studies are not great, but they serve a purpose because you want to see if there is any correlation between ivermectin and its potential to help against COVID. If you see a correlation, that warrants spending more time and money to do a bigger, higher-quality study to prove or disprove that the drug is safe and effective. And the best studies for that are double-blinded, randomized placebo control trials. The more people in the study, the more you can rely on the results. That is how you prove cause and effect.
So you take 30,000 people, give half of them a placebo, and the other half the medicine. Then you look at your results, and that is how you get your answer if it's safe and effective. That’s the process that was done with the vaccines. The same can not be said for Ivermectin.
Generally speaking, when given doses used to treat parasitic infections in humans, ivermectin is very safe. So we’re talking about 200 mcg per kilogram, so for a 75 kg person, around 165 pounds, you’re looking at a 15 mg dose. Before the pandemic, prescriptions for ivermectin in this country were 3,600 per week. Now they are more than 88,000 per week.
But even more concerning is people getting the drug from livestock supply centers, which can come in a highly concentrated paste or liquid forms?
Sometimes 10 to 15 times the amount that we give people.
Well, guess what?
Mississippi’s health department said that 70% of recent calls to the state poison control center had come from people who ingested ivermectin from livestock supply stores. Same thing going on in Alabama.
What are the common symptoms?
Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea. But there’s also nerve damage, seizures, and sometimes death.
Doctor Mike Hansen, MD
Internal Medicine | Pulmonary Disease | Critical Care Medicine
Website: doctormikehansen.com/
Doctor Hansen's Courses: doctormikehansen.com/courses/
Contact and Social Media Links: doctormikehansen.com/contact/
#covid #ivermectin #vaccine

[@DoctorMikeHansen]

Doctor Mike Hansen's Programs ⏩ FULL Course for MORE ENERGY: learn.doctormikehansen.com/products/increase-energy-course/ FREE Course for MORE ENERGY: doctormikehansen.com/6-days-to-more-energy/

[@TheProkurora]

Could you comment, that a new study shows Fenofibrate could reduce COVID Infection by 70 %! Thank You!

[@syrainwar2994]

cbd is more of vaso dilator then stroids and a anti-inflamoty mabey a one-two ischemia blocking blood flow iverment or nictoine withdral while sick could up the viral load logicly ace2

[@gregoryraven3213]

I was in ICU five days treated with ivermectin n colchicine cocktail skipped normal room back home? My wife has COPD took ivermectin colchicine early after testing positive for Covid n 7 days later still no symptoms? Using livestock meds is dangerous but people are desperate! They didn’t ask dr Death aka Fauci to do gain of function research in communist labs to give them Covid?

[@6VISIX]

Seems to me you are pretty knowledgeable with trials and statistics, when are you going to start your own trials using what really works and stop going by what other health organizations have to say!

[@williamroberts2478]

You’re a doctor which to me is the equivalent of a mechanic looking for issues to fix, I’d love to see a pathologist rip you to shreds on your “theories”

[@danemiller4852]

Worked for my co-worker. He was getting worse and worse with covid. He told me he couldn't stand because he was so weak and couldn't catch his breath. Then started using ivermectin that his cousin shipped him (yes the human kind) and got better in 3 days. This is why doctors shouldn't dictate what people are allowed to take. Let the patient choose what they want. Whether it be a vaccine, natural immunity, or even ivermectin. Doctors should advise and recommend with professional opinion. But in the end the patients are the ones who should choose whats best for them and they should be granted access to it.

[@grandma27or8]

All I know is that I could barely stand with my breathing extremely labored for two days. I took IVM (prescribed with proper dosage) and 2 hours later all symptoms were gone. They did not return.

[@swampfoxtaylor5728]

Yes, it works extremely well. During spring of last year 2020, it was administered to eight hundred elderly patients in France, all diagnosed with Covid. All of them recovered within two-three days. Full recovery. The story was squashed by the media. It was also used in India recently and the so called cases went to nearly zero.

[@midsayap2012]

I was well with ivm period.

[@heliusuniverse7460]

@@swampfoxtaylor5728 get out of here with your anecdotal evidence, please.

[@rap3208]

@@heliusuniverse7460 It's not even an anecdote. He is lying.

[@lingo2025]

@@swampfoxtaylor5728 you completely made that up. Are the aliens paying you to post on KZbin?

[@russelljohnston4256]

Dr Hanson, can you explain why covid deaths dropped by 97% in India 5 weeks after making ivermectin available?

[@officialspock]

cause correlation equals causation? lol

[@crapObear2323]

Correlation / Causation fallacy.

[@officialspock]

@Compatible Nourishment by Red Cottage Creams how does dewormer cure covid?

[@kofativ3205]

@@officialspock My colleague was tested positive, he started to use the vet I.V_ M, along, food first, with Vitamin C, D, Zinc and Quercetin. After 3 days the fever was gone, on day 4 the fast test done at home was negative.

[@mr.2cents.846]

No he can't. And wouldn't want to.

[@jmarty1000]

Your next video should be about all the people who died but could have been saved with Ivermectin. I'll wait.

[@osonegro8924]

Approved or not, it worked wonderfully for me, I am 64 and I was hit hard. But chloroquine and ivermectin worked wonderfully.

[@arreyes4658]

My brother was infected by covid19 after first shot of astrazenica, and got severe. He was monitored to take 8 caps of ivermectin for 3 days due to his weight.. also with steaming and sodium ascorbate...So happy cause now he is recovering w/o being hospitalized... just sharing the true to life experience...

[@CaliforniaEBRDude]

How did things turn out for the control version of your brother who had the exact same situation but did not take ivermectin?

[@fifun8479]

When he get admitted to hospital.i mean how many days back?

[@arreyes4658]

@@fifun8479 he wasn’t hospitalized. But he was tested positive of Covid 19 after a week of being vaccinated by astrazenica.

[@catfarrow1474]

Ivermectin has been around the block and is safe if used correctly but you'd rather have people take vaccines that haven't been tested long term yet. Something is wrong with this scenario.

[@toby9999]

That's ridiculous. Vaccines have been shown to work effectivelly while ivermectin hasn't. That's the bottom line.

[@catfarrow1474]

@@toby9999 No, not true. They won't prescribe Ivermectin because if there were a cure for Covid, they wouldn't be able to use their untested "vaccine" on millions of people under the EUA. It's dishonest and hurting a lot people that can be helped. They're trying to make it look like it doesn't work and suppress any info on it as disinformation. Any one who says it works gets deleted off whatever platform they use.

[@markrobinowitz8473]

@@catfarrow1474 Our hospitals are now full of fools who think "vaccine" needs scare quotes and deny facts.

[@catfarrow1474]

@@markrobinowitz8473 I put it quotes because a normal vaccine could take years and years to be developed and tested in all of its stages. This was done in 6 months by people who are just as bad as street dealers. Half of them have no idea how it works. It's gene therapy and not really a vaccine. It also only lasts for a short time and doesn't even work on all the different strains so who knows where this is all going. Let's use the cures and quit pretending there aren't any.

[@freder8569]

The question should not be, "Should I take Ivermectin, or get a vaccine?" It should be, "Why can't people who are infected, or can't get a vaccine, participate in an Ivermectin trial?" 🤔

[@anteeko]

Well vaccinated people get sick too and end up in hospital too, ivermectin can be usefull to them too. treatment matters

[@flagmichael]

There are very few adequate ivermectin trials because there is no money for a large enough one. There is a process to be followed, just as with the vaccines. Trials, reports, FDA submissions, request for fast track.... All of it costs money - quite a bit of money. Ivermectin is approved for various antiparasitic roles but antiviral use is off-label. To get it added to the list of uses takes money. That is the rub. Ivermectin is also off-patent. Nobody wants to spend the money to go through all the requirements because everybody can continue to make as much ivermectin as they are already making for veterinary purposes. It is not greed but the absence of greed that is holding it back.

[@ilikefreespeech3565]

Ssshh, what do you think you’re doing thinking like that. That’s a thought crime ya know.

[@CoinsBand]

I think globally we should be heading towards narratives around preventions and therapeutics, even for folks who've been vaccinated.

[@Adyen11234]

@@flagmichael This comment... Isn't this literally ignoring all the studies that were listed by Dr. Hansen after 6:30?

[@pingpongballz5998]

My friend was very sick with covid he was in Mexico. He took ivermectin and felt better.

[@elementaesthetique]

The study I saw when I googled it was from Argentina. It was given to a placebo group vs ivermectin group of a few hundred covid+ patients each. The ivermectin group cleared sars-cov-2 viral load on average 5 days, placebo group average 10 or 12 days. Like the first 3 results are studies that confirm ivermectin helps? What am I missing

[@adamrak7560]

Which study are you referring to? The studies I found were all over place (NCT04529525 NCT04701710). Those studies have very low accuracy, they prove that ivermectin does not significantly worsen the covid cases, and _may_ help. Basically those studies mean that it would be good idea to make bigger studies for statistically significant results. But even if ivermectin works, according to those studies we have an upper limit on its effectiveness.

[@cindyblaylock67]

Nothing. You aren’t drinking the koolaid.

[@elementaesthetique]

@@adamrak7560 why wouldn't you take it if it may help?

[@zoomskiller]

You aren't missing anything. When you actually review the evidence it's obvious that it is effective in prophylaxis and early treatment.

[@Nick-kb5ob]

@@adamrak7560 you have to be carefull when looking at studies, it's easy to achieve a desired result by altering the protocol.. for instance there's over 60 trials (all relatively small) on ivermectin from all around the world incuding a meta-analysis with the majority being positive, yet the ones they recite as evidence use a relatively small, insignificant dose and stop the treatment after a couple days. There's a research study done by Yale where they supposedly disproved that the unemployment benefits were contributing to nobody going back to work and places being severly understaffed, they conveniently left part-time employee's and people who worked a job for less then 5 years out off the study.... basically only leaving the people who were invested in their jobs. In doing this they took something that was obviously true and made it appear to be false according to their desires, this is also a common occurrence in the pharmaceutical and medical industries.

[@fishslab]

Now, also talk about the failures of Remdesivir...

[@MR..181]

Why, would they want to kill people.?

[@mhbrazda]

And that’s the price of Remd

[@imagrandpa]

@@mhbrazda And... WHO owns it?

[@thepope2412]

ivermectin ironically has a better track record of covid treatment but it's the drug that's not proven to work...

[@jwquantum3901]

@@thepope2412 false

[@lmatic8two]

Government Chronie!!! Lol. Pathetic!

[@Ann10999]

Don’t know about everyone , but it worked for my Niece and her family, 🤷‍♀️

[@rnbham39]

These kinds of videos are just comical at this point. Ivermectin’s success has gone way beyond anecdotal at this point. But like all drugs they must be used correctly. 🙄

[@PendeltonWhiskey]

Oh do tell DOCTOR, what dosage of horse worming medicine do you reccomend?

[@georgeboros263]

If you look at the limitations of the study to which you referred at 6:30 the conclusions are very limited in scope and population. It appears to be a very poor study with minimal useful results It certainly doesn't address whether ivermectin reduces death in those patients most likely to suffer that result. To extend these conclusions to say that ivermectin is not an effective treatment is premature to say the least.

[@Lionforaday]

Thoughtfully reasoned and well said

[@dray4238]

Ya he let's that slide but critizes the studies showing positive effects

[@stupidas9466]

There is NO GOOD EVIDENCE at this point. When (if) there becomes good evidence, then all public health officials, groups, and regulatory agencies will recommend it. Period.

[@dray4238]

@@stupidas9466 its proven safe and cheap and there's enough evidence to show promise...which is why thousands of Drs around the world already include it in their covid protocols

[@DavidIstre]

I would like to see you interact with the statements made by Dr. Peter McCullough's testimony before the Texas Senate HHS Committee.

[@deborahmccall711]

So would I!

[@mangos2888]

Who? What testimony?

[@tjworker5482]

@@mangos2888 some people know more than you. They dig deep and go against the grain, for logical reason. I’ll find the link for you and send it

[@agnieszkasawicka3600]

@@tjworker5482 please add me in my friend 🙏

[@bigbulls6562]

Me as well

[@woodyshoemaker168]

I do not think the use of dramatics in this video gives ivermectin a fair hearing. Remember, it has been given to humans 3.7 billion times and it is being used very effectively in the treatment of COVID-19 both in this country and all over the world.

[@MITsolar]

Not true at all....even the manufacturer of Ivermectin which is Merck says NOT to use it for Covid...period

[@DrRickKellyCrossroadHealthDPC]

@@MITsolar Merck has multiple Billion dollar drugs in the pipeline that they need EUA for.

[@sirrathersplendid4825]

@@MITsolar - If it makes no money for them why promote it? Especially if you have your own expensive proprietary drug in the pipeline.

[@raywalker4656]

@Steve Sheldon Forget about studies. We are in the middle of a pandemic, doctors are on the front line trying to put a fire out, and the good ones, the clinicians, do what ever they can, with whatever tools they have around that are SAFE, to extinguish the flames. Doctors who work in hospitals are NOT front line doctors in most countries. If you want to hear what a front line doctor has to say, look for videos on Dr Darrell Demello.

[@johanndeale9365]

@@MITsolar Then, why did they sponsor 3,7 billion doses over 35 years ??? Surely they are then guilty of a crime against humanity ???

[@BB-qp9ri]

Have these jabs been proved to be “ safe and effective “ ? Long term, nobody knows

[@pre-jordanbasketballfan7429]

Actually long term they are fine. No modern Vaccine has ever had long term side effects show up after 2 months. Millions of people have had the vaccine for longer then that.

[@grassCrow]

Has water been approved by the FDA? If not, why would you put it in your body?

[@mamaknows1062]

We just had 2 friends non vaccinated get covid. One tested positive his 4th day of feeling sick. He took prescription human grade ivermectin and 4 days later feeling like new, tested negative. His wife thought she was having mild covid, awoke on her 5fh day struggling to breath was in hospital 2 days. Both recovered it took her a week longer to feel okay while he had no symptoms went back to work.

[@stnrodriguez]

I dont believe you..

[@mamaknows1062]

@@stnrodriguez that's your prerogative. I share only truthful information I think helpful. I'm 63, devout believer in the Lord, Him I have to answer to. .We have other friends that used same protocol after losing their 41 yr old niece just 2 weeks ago. Day before hospital was to release her, she suddenly went into total organ failure leaving her 12 yr daughter and husband. Do some research on last 10 yrs of ivermectin. Proving effective at stopping virus replicating from common cold to hiv. It does have to be taken early within first few days. This works well on fully vaccinated breakthrough cases as well as unvaccinated. Happy researching.

[@stnrodriguez]

@@mamaknows1062 you believe and god, which means you dont believe in facts And go ahead and state you sources, cause i still don't believe you.

[@stnrodriguez]

@@mamaknows1062 how can it have 10 years of being affected on this strain of covid if this strain has only been around for 2 years?

[@mamaknows1062]

@@stnrodriguez Did you read my response? They've been studying its effects on common colds to hiv. Do continue to believe what you want.

[@dr.luisgo3169]

Can you look at Utter Pradesh and explain what's happening there?

[@mm-zw1zc]

Dr. Mike, beside dose considerations, another important consideration is the timing of the drug. Giving steroids early in the disease doesn't work. Vaccines only work if they are given well ahead of the disease. But when someone gets acute COVID we are telling people to stay at home and do nothing. Vaccines don't help at that point. Steroids don't help at that point. Beyond the meta-analysis' there are just countless personal testimonies of dramatic recovery with Ivermectin. And AFAIK in the meta-analysis people have shown that even removing the individual studies you are concerned with there are several others and on the whole, there is benefit. You are making an argument that in early disease sitting home and doing NOTHING is a better risk/reward for patients than prescribing Ivermectin dosing as advised by the FLCCC (which is higher than the dose you describe but still well within safety tolerances). So I just don't buy your arguments. IMO the debate is legit but we should not be suppressing the discussion. I second the vote for you calling Dr. Kory and having a debate where both of you present your evidence.

[@oswaldjames6295]

Did You notice he slipped in the Dosage You should use!? You gotta "read between the lines"!😂👍💉🌍

[@iamisaid2295]

what's concerning here in this vid was no mention of FLCCC. and that debunked lopez-medina piece.

[@Jaifreeman]

That debate will never happen my friend. I can’t figure out whether all these doctors are corrupt or just to indoctrinated to see the truth…

[@charlesx1957]

Yes he will not debate the FLCCC Alliance, they are the group of ICU Doctors on the front line fighting covid and researchers promoting not just ivermectin but a cocktail of measures to treat covid. Not one is a silver bullet but together seems to help . They say yes get the vaccine but for people that can't or won't it's next best option than doing nothing. These ICU Doctors are the ones that came up with steroids to treat covid in the hospital setting only against dead virus causing inflation, do not use steroids in early covid when virus is still replicating. Game changer for treatment in hospital setting.

[@jkumar8714]

I know... he is clearly not digging deep enough.

[@dids_lfc4113]

Can you and Dr Kory do a live debate on this topic? That would be gold

[@sheilamohammed8306]

Dr. Kory would destroy him. This video is click bait. He mentioned the officer from Georgia. That officer used an animal form if Ivermectin not prescribed by a Doctor. Also Hydroxychloroquine as managed care does work. Dr. Chetty treated with it and published on its dosage and efficacy.

[@aka10gu]

Never happen. Dr. Kory would never waste his time on this guy.

[@rozanchawla3240]

That would be classic

[@4everyoung24]

@@sheilamohammed8306 if he’s so awful, why you watching this channel?

[@fredp2172]

@@sheilamohammed8306 yeah except hydroxycloroquine didnt actually work when you really look at the clinical trial but its Nice to see you know so Little about this stuff that you are posting inaccurate informations

[@krishnansm438]

What is the number of people who were on trial for Remdisiver before it was used for Covid ?

[@magsb3]

Or indeed any of the drugs currently being used for SARS CoV2 and who funded the trial?

[@krishnansm438]

@@slanginmangos8106 In short Ebola drug was repurposed for Covid. Even in the first lot of patients with Covid , doctors used a cocktail of drugs. Efficacy of Remdisivier is not proven !

[@amarie1454]

I think around 1000

[@jeff_in_ok]

So how's the vaccine really been proven to be safe and effective? It's only been in use for a few months. Do we have an idea of the long-term effects?

[@Kowalski301]

A few months? The first human trails started March 2020, that is 18 months ago, or 1,5 year. So yeah, I think we have a pretty good picture on long term effects.

[@rawdi111]

@Shawn S yeah, I am old enough to remember back in the 1960s seeing babies born without arms and legs from mothers taking morning sickness pills. Not cought by the FDA.

[@markrobinowitz8473]

@@rawdi111 Wrong. Thalidomide was NOT approved by the FDA. It was approved in a couple European countries, though, never here in USA.

[@michaelward1341]

I'm glad you started by saying it was a good drug for certain things instead of pretending it's just a horse dewormer like everyone else.

[@retromancer1739]

I wholeheartedly second this. This video will do more to convince those that think Ivermectin is a good treatment for covid than all the MSM calling the drug "horse dewormer" combined

[@davelawson2564]

But he still uses a half baked example which will make Dr fauchi proud of him . Ivermectin is not miracle drug but it works as part of protocol. clearly this nutcase doctor has no clue. And if you have comorbidities and no effort to address that even the hyped up vaccines cannot save you. I've seen many doctors who promoted vaccines as life saver die of covid even after 2 doses.

[@arturoaguilar6002]

It's their own fault for exhausting the pharmacies' supply of the version made for humans, going for the livestock dewormer and ending up poisoning themselves for overdose.

[@swanurine]

@@davelawson2564 how many doctors? What data? Breakthrough infections are real, just as you can still die in a car accident while wearing seatbelt. However data from the CDC and many hospitals show that vaccines are effective in reducing risk of infection and serious symptoms in case of infection. If you want anecdotal evidence, nearly everyone in my office is vaccinated. One guy got a breakthrough, and he experienced mild symptoms.

[@kikiob3628]

And who believes the cdc and fda for ANYTHING??

[@thedroneguyfl5410]

I frequently watch your videos because you explain things very well that even a lay person can understand. I just want to say that I personally know people who contracted COVID-19 and their physicians prescribed them Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine for their treatment protocol at early onset and everyone recovered without having to go to the hospital or requiring vent treatment. I also know that in at least one hospital, Ivermectin can't even be brought up in the hospital's system to prescribe and neither drug is available or in the treatment protocol.

[@nosuchthing8]

Yes, this is how faith healers work. In any affliction, there are some people that mysteriously get better. Those few are used as evidence and everyone else is ignored.

[@spacetoast7783]

Personal stories of two events occurring in sequence are not evidence of the efficacy of anything.

[@F.o.s.t.e.r.]

I also know people that can jump off of buildings and fly, that doesn't mean we should all try. or does it?

[@WBKimmons]

@@nosuchthing8 this isn’t faith healing.

[@spacetoast7783]

@@WBKimmons Yes it is. The same amount of high quality evidence exists for both.

[@louisejoel]

I read Ivermectin may have some anti-viral properties. Any potential medicine that might be therapeutic was denied funding for trials here, but that is likely because the response is investor-driven and a particular deal has been made to exclude competition. I haven't seen the contract myself and don't know if it's available for public view.

[@codytherottweiler3369]

In 2015, the Nobel Committee for Physiology or Medicine, in its only award for treatments of infectious diseases since six decades prior, honoured the discovery of ivermectin (IVM), a multifaceted drug deployed against some of the world’s most devastating tropical diseases

[@anjilala]

Ivermectin works for parasite based diseases. The doses are very low. The high doses people have been taking are not safe

[@janyenyo]

@@anjilala Most people I know are taking the amount listed on the protocol on FLCCC, 2mg/Kg body weight and the dose is higher 4-6mg/Kg bw for severe disease

[@timbookedtwo2375]

@@anjilala You could consider a virus a kind of parasite.

[@Lawman212]

@@janyenyo I wouldn't trust the FLCCC demon sperm from aliens doctor lady. She legit believes that demon sperm is a problem.

[@markrobinowitz8473]

@@timbookedtwo2375 I recommend taking a biology class.

[@richardjeffery1473]

Please have a look at the FLCCC. And the studies .

[@WildSanative]

What about the multiple cases when it worked? This is one case. How about the patients suffering side effects from the vaccine. Use critical thinking people when it comes to your own health.

[@petertromp8786]

"Critical thinking" when it comes to your own health can lead to your death. That's why there are medical experts - people who trained in that arena - to help you. They don't always get it right, because they're not wizards, but they're the best we got.

[@WildSanative]

Just because they call themselves experts doesn’t make them the end all be all. Critical thinking could save a life . Ask the people who are suffering from the side effects . More and more stories of serous side effects, even death stories are surfacing. Maybe if the read the warning labels and practices critical thinking they wouldn’t be worse off than before the vaccine they took. Their are alternative treatments and every human being has a right to decide what’s best for their body. It doesn’t stop anyone from getting covid or spreading it either the vaccine. So critical thinking is absolutely in order. No "expert “ can control nature. Only arrogant human beings believe that. So spreading fear and bullying people into a vaccine that clearly is NOT a cure shouldn’t be pushed. Parents raise their children not the government. The government doesn’t own anyone. How about some integrity? Their are alternative treatments that are successful. It’s dishonest and bad medicine practices to speak so arrogantly and hold a position of authority. Many "experts” speak of alternatives as well. It’s up to the individual what they chose to put in their body. These mandates is bullying.

[@javierpatag3609]

I see 2,800 Ivermectin takers here, at the time of this posting.

[@lancekidwell5729]

We had a vaccine for a year without FDA approval. I treated my Covid with a anti viral from Mexico.

[@mikemcmullin149]

How odd, Ivermectin is being used as a prophylaxis in some countries, granted mostly for parasites, but such a broad range of use seems to never have been deeply studied for unintended issues and benefits.

[@Maxtastic101]

But if a medicine is safe, why try to restrict anything when we are desperate?

[@jackbartzen9133]

Bc there’s a much safer, free alternative…

[@flagmichael]

Because it is not that safe. The calls to poison control cited at 4:45 are a huge red flag.

[@jerseytony1]

@@flagmichael They were FORCED to take the Animal paste without using correct dosage probably.. BECAUSE we cannot buy the one for us.. They have BLOOD on their hands for prohibiting this which would have prevented at least 80% pf so called Covid Deaths!

[@stuntcountry8488]

09/01/2021 Head of Tokyo Medical Association says “now is the time” for all covid patients to get ivermectin, not vaccines. Haruo Ozaki, chairman of the Tokyo Metropolitan Medical Association. Ivermectin has been medically prescribed to humans for around 30 years. Ivermectin won the Nobel Prize for medications in 2015 and is on the World Health Organization's list of essential medicines.

[@amjadsiddig2085]

This is only relevant if you're a doctor/researcher in the field who knows what you're talking about

[@HP-qm2ku]

He didn't say that 😂😂😂 link the source then.

[@stuntcountry8488]

@@amjadsiddig2085 I am just quoting the researcher and the WHO website. It is the Head of Tokyo Medical Association he has done all the research.

[@stuntcountry8488]

@@HP-qm2ku Here is the source.

[@HP-qm2ku]

@@stuntcountry8488 umm where?

[@jayson6750]

India cases plummeted though vaccination rate was low because their doctors prescribing Ivermectin as one of the cocktail drugs for early treatment. Now Indonesia cases plummeted after their hospitals prescribed this drug. While countries with high vaccination experiencing high surge of cases and deaths. Explain that.

[@robinconnelly6079]

Well said.

[@plav032]

Perhaps the virus ran out of new hosts to infect, given that those countries had massive rates of infection, poor testing, and were also giving a cocktail of drugs under "sympathetic care" (as in a last ditch effort to save their life) some of those people will recover on their own, some not, if the ones that got drugs survived, is that concrete evidence the drug worked? If so which ones? If the science is sound we will find out, but so far, all of these studies have came up with nothing substantial.

[@paulak9871]

India, really? The same India that ran our of Oxygen?

[@robinconnelly6079]

@@plav032 Ivermectin was already established as effective by the end of 2020. Tons of trials. Google Dr Tess Laurie who mike Hanson strangely omits. Many people think that trials only started recently but they have, in fact been going on since the pandemic began. Solid, established, peer reviewed data. But the FDA and the WHO ignored it. Fact. And I can prove it. And mike Hanson ignores it also. Strange, that. Sometimes dose adjustments are needed for the new variants but, other than that, nothing has changed

[@dmac7128]

Could it be that the delta variant ran out of hosts to infect? Just a thought. Perhaps that should be studied. Aside from that, the data on the number of reported cases and deaths is probably grossly underreported due to local conditions where extremely high population densities exist which would allow for it to spread incredibly quickly. So it stands to reason that the supply of hosts rapidly ran out.

[@Cherokee800]

Magic words “safe and effective”.

[@invictusinmoralis6953]

I'm from Colombia, where the JAMA study was conducted. NYT and other media took it like gospel while here everyone in Cali knew the study was flawed from the beggining. The study was underpowered (478 patients) , poorly randomized (the populations in each arm were inconsistent by age, gender and comorbidities) and have severe protocol breaches, For example : - in the middle of the study they discarded 78 patients, and switched placebo people with ivermectin. The paper mentions that no affectation to the protocol, but they dont say how they know that. - The assesment was subjective, they didn't do viral load test determine the severity of the infection. They didn't even do a PCR at the 21 days to determine clearance of the virus. - They didn't control for when it was administered, the initiation of the protocol was arbitrary - Placebo patient did take ivermectin as it's very easy to get in Colombia over the counter, and the doctors give them recipes. In Cali a lot of people were self administering it when the study was done, the study only give ivermectin per 1 person per household. What people did was go pharmacist and buy extra with the same recipe and give both the placebo and the extra doses to the whole household. Also there was a significant reduction in symptoms in the ivermectin arm, but they didn't mention that because they just evaluated "clearance at 21 days". Under the subjective criteria. Other misc things: - The study said they need to take the ivermectin on empty stomach, that doesn't make any sense, all the other procotols and normal usages say it take it with meals, because the excipients tend to cause stomach ache on an empty stomach (and this is true of many things like vitamin excipients). Given their protocol they reported stomach ache as adverse effect, like no joke, you told them wrong. - Other protocols use 0.4-0.6 mg/kg injected subcutaneous per dose 5 days or until the symptoms clear. This study used 0.3 mg/kg oral, given the bioavailabity is around 50% oral, that is the equivalent of 0.15mg/kg. They are way below the safe dosage as is used for malaria (up to 2mg/kg) so i don't see a toxicological concern.

[@MrStingie]

Dr. What really happened in Mexico? In Utah Pradesh, India? Tell us about the two different Ivermectin. One for livestock. One for Humans. A liquid and a tablet. Bring better facts please.

[@Baard2000]

Dont bring that up ...its annoying... I was just being very sarcastic ..... That province in India reinstalled the covid treatment protocol . The others that didnt...thete cases skyrocketed and that was shownin MSM. So what is going on in the province where cases are dropping fast?

[@sirrathersplendid4825]

There were also several successful studies in South America. Apparently a few counties that adopted Ivermectin had very good outcomes compared to neighbouring counties that didn’t.

[@sirrathersplendid4825]

I believe its exactly the same Ivermectin for humans and livestock, just very different dosages.

[@Baard2000]

@@sirrathersplendid4825 Those using horsepaste in too high dose end up calling the CDC, whatever agency records drug poisening. Read one comment where a man told he used the complete dose for a 1250 lbs horse.....he had no side effects the only one getting rid of all symptons within 1 day.... But others might not be so lucky...

[@3lgring0]

Can someone show me the peer reviewed studies proving Ivermectin DOES NOT work? Because to my knowledge, there are more than 50 showing that in some cases it's extremely beneficial to the patients.

[@pianokat1]

Listen at 6:50. It answers your question.

[@blaireofhylia1572]

Wut? That's not how it works though. Maybe it DOES work, and if you're dying of covid coz you didn't get vaccinated why not try it out? But there's no reason to assume it does before those studies are complete

[@EllariaSand]

My brother and sister-in-law were down to 90% oxygen couldn't eat and were too weak to get out of bed. After two pharmacy-compounded Ivermectin doses, one returned to work and the other will go back Monday. TWO DOSES! IT WORKS!

[@Stephanie-ul6lq]

Don’t use anecdotal evidence.

[@EllariaSand]

@@Stephanie-ul6lq Dr. Rafael Cruz in Louisville has saved hundreds of lives this year. He prescribed IVM, and, subsequently, his patients VERY quickly recover. That's not antidotal, that's fact!

[@kofativ3205]

@@Stephanie-ul6lq My colleague was tested positive, in home quarantine he used Ivermectin, Vitamin C, D, Zinc and Qercetin, on day 3 the fever was gone, on day 4 the fast test at home, was negative. So... that's the reality, no one can beat that.

[@Stephanie-ul6lq]

@@kofativ3205 lol no, likely he would have recovered without ivermectin or any of the medications. Most healthy people recover within a week or so anyway. Knowing one person who recovered with use of that medication is not a scientific study. That is the problem with people not actually looking at the studies and just referring to someone they know who took it

[@Stephanie-ul6lq]

@@EllariaSand do you need me to show you all the studies showing no benefit of ivermectin? Or do you just pick and choose which information to listen to? Sounds like you just find information to support what you already think than really looking at the evidence. Majority of doctors do not prescribe this medication because the fda has advised against using it due to the several studies showing no benefit.

[@preciousissah7395]

Ivermectin is in the website of NIH and it's safe

[@bababa4275]

Terrible things happen when science is not science anymore but becomes politics or conspiracy theory.

[@meb480]

It also depends on how long he waited to be treated. More have died from the vaccine than ivermectin...with the other medications. American frontline drs have successfully treated HUMANS with ivermectin along with the other medications

[@yesplease9021]

Wait a minute… “proven safe and effective”, you mean, emergency authorization for the jab which limits corporate liability… oh yeah, that’s what I thought.

[@DondeCake]

I know right? The vaccine has been injected over 5.52 billion times so far and almost none of them died or got sick. It's almost like he's using "statistics" to try and explain why it's "proven safe and effective". Typical liberals.

[@grospipo20]

@@DondeCake lol lmao..you kill me with this one

[@jcrewjem5394]

Pfizer has full FDA approval.

[@grospipo20]

@@jcrewjem5394 don’t waste your time…these people are in a cult. It is sad

[@mikedi7850]

@@jcrewjem5394 no it doesn't the emergency use got re approved, nowhere on the FDAs website does it say the Pfizer shot is fully approved somebody is lying to us i already looked into it

[@rickbaker261]

You wish you wish you wish. How about you look outside our walls (India - which has been using it effectively, Mexico City…) Maybe look at FLCCC for protocols.

[@Visualxposed]

Let’s talk about that remdesivir…

[@knuftobor]

Why would someone want take a drug the FDA says is safe & effective? How many foods & drugs currently available are unsafe that perhaps cause heart disease, cancer, diabetes, inflammation have been approved by the FDA? How is a drug for certain conditions suddenly unsafe for COVID? In a pandemic, shouldn't anything be aloud if the patient wants it. As for these studies for or against certain foods or drugs are still just for marketing a product. Just like a commercial is targeted at the end user, the drug studies are targeted at those prescribe them. With a TV commercial, you can expect your experience with the product, will not be the same as the commercial. Millions are spent on deceptive marketing because it's profitable. How profitable is the food & drug industry?

[@Tas0228]

Nailed it. If they let you buy cancerous cigarettes or eat garbage food that causes inflammation that leads to autoimmune disease then nothing they say has validity. The FDA is funded by Pharm. They work for Pharm. I love how they picked Jason to be the token doctor to speak about this. It’s all theatrics at this point

[@richardmalinowski2698]

Also posted on YT today "UT Health San Antonio is launching a COVID-19 treatment study involving ivermectin"

[@ajs11201]

Great. We'll look forward to seeing the results of the study. No one is against studies--the problem is that a great many people are thinking they somehow have superior intelligence to the scientists and doctors who actually study these things.

[@ms.jessadventures]

Duke University also just started one

[@ms.jessadventures]

A clinical study

[@NoMoreBsPlease]

@@ajs11201 The problem is it's being used to fight COVID-19 in a hospital setting. Guess where Joe Rogan took it? Guess who's still shitting on Joe Rogan because they have conservative followers? Their doctor is a hack.

[@fredp2172]

@@NoMoreBsPlease yeah jo Rogan took like 6 other médication with it if you bother Watching is video including some very expensive one so how you Do you know ivermectin is the one that helped him ?

[@moonglum1015]

If Ivermectin was still under patent do you think Merck would be extolling its virtues or would they be saying don't use it? Edit: corrected typo.

[@Adyen11234]

As far as I can tell, Ivermectin was patented in 2008, and an average patent lasts at least 20 years... So yes, it's still under patent. Thus everyone who is buying it is paying the patent owner.

[@moonglum1015]

@@Adyen11234 unless Google is lying, which is not in and of itself unheard of, Merck's patent expired in 1996. I think there is a company called Gates that may have a patent on an injectable form of it. I only had a quick hunt around so I could easily be wrong about that. What got you thinking that the patent was as recent as 2008 given that ivermectin was discovered many decades ago?

[@jennifermobley250]

@@Adyen11234 No. Merck lost its patents around 2008. I'm a veterinarian, and generic have been available for years.

[@Adyen11234]

@@jennifermobley250 You say this, but the government patent registry says otherwise. Look it up. KZbin don't allow links to be placed in comments.

[@kapdolkim1914]

You mean like Remdesivir? $10,000 a treatment even though 'the science' was clear it was useless against Covid. But a lot of bozo doctors prescribed it! You bet they would.

[@rare6319]

Can you explain uttar Pradeshs covid stats for the last month then. What has changed if not ivemectum.

[@katherinesmith8591]

The doctor who went Washington n got FDA to give the steroids for COVID last year, is the same doctor that went back after studies another country etc. with ivermectin as a drug for COVID. But the government chose to chose the vaccines.

[@amykruse6887]

Dangers of dihydrogen monoxide - Thanks for the smile today on that one.

[@flagmichael]

Here in Arizona, we are proud of our success in ridding several streams of dihydrogen monoxide entirely (barring some natural events... we are working on that.)

[@missano3856]

Dihydrogen monoxide is used in enormous quantities in such places as factory farms and nuclear power plants...enough said.

[@ToxicGreenClipz]

I live next to the border, in Mexico this is what people are taking. I got covid, tried for about 1 pill a day for 5 days and tested negative in 10 days, did it work? I honestly don't know.

[@indianmilitary]

It does work. There is dose dependent effect on covid.

[@ToxicGreenClipz]

@@indianmilitary my symptoms where minor. Cough for a 3 days. Loss of taste and smell for 5 days, fatigue all 10 days. Never lost appetite though. I do have muscle aches, headaches 14 days later. I guess it wasn't to bad compared to others.

[@rap3208]

Probably you would have gotten well without it. You do know that only a very small percentage gets severe enough to need hospitalization, and only about 2% dies from it, right?

[@Northdallasguy00]

Three days of ivermectin helped me get over my long-haul symptoms.

[@cele8910]

What kind of long hauler symptoms did you have?

[@nocheesable2345]

@@cele8910 good question

[@brinjoness3386]

You could have taken cocain, got drunk and smoked some weed and have felt better. They are drugs that have some benefit and are researched. Taking vet medication is great way to look like a dick if you have to go to a hospital.

[@verasimmons9940]

Why are you being nasty ? @@brinjoness3386

[@steve0ne11]

It helped me tremendously with my long haul as well. After 5 months of trying everything and seeing dozens of specialists, it was literally the only thing that helped. I thought I should add this. I really don’t care whether people believe me or not. Also, my long haul symptoms were triggered by the vaccine. First dose of Pfizer (April 2). Yes, it is a thing. You can find support groups with thousands of members.

[@iamisaid2295]

did you want to mention that the EUA precludes the use of any other adequate alternatives for treatment?

[@BuddhishMusic]

did you mention that Merck came out to say the drug may be unsafe? after they lost the patent and already admitted millions of doses safely? this is why people aren’t getting the vaccine. our public health institutions are captured by pharma (see gottlieb and Hahn FDA officials being hired at pfizer and moderna after approving the vaccines)

[@thepope2412]

@@BuddhishMusic People are not getting the vaccine because there is reasonable doubt to it's saftey and effectiveness

[@jimleland181]

Why don't you report on how many people that you saw in the hospital for COVID-19 and had taken ivermectin and said that it didn't work.

[@juanaguilar37]

Exactly. I know I cant be the only one who has treated large numbers of ivermectin users in the ICU.

[@brinjoness3386]

Our government did in Australia. Well it did do it with one person, he overdosed so the right wing will probably want his hospital visit listed as covid and not his idiotic decision to take cow meds to treat his covid.

[@SloanR2502]

So how about what flccc shows about ivermectin???

[@iamisaid2295]

haha, how dare you bring this up? did he even mention Dr Kory?

[@minispinakins2034]

Google some more you apparently need practice.

[@charlesx1957]

@@peterstoops5683 FLCCC Alliance

[@Mommathatsmyname]

And what about the data from Mexico, Peru, and India. Yes, I know, they’re not RTCs, but shouldn’t these VERY LARGE numbers that demonstrate significant reduction in rates of hospital admission be considered given the current state of hospital bed shortages?!? Especially since this med already has a demonstrated safety profile for YEARS.

[@robertcooper5308]

This vaccine hasn't had a 5 years study yet...

[@lorihamlin3604]

Neither has Ivermectin for treatment of Covid.

[@nayadedecumbe7407]

Not true. Moderna has spent more than a decade working on this novel approach to vaccinate people.

[@thepope2412]

@@DanLyndon Yes there is don't be ignorant. Maybe try to look for the studies instead of reading headlines.

[@kofativ3205]

@@nayadedecumbe7407 So, are you saying that Moderna did prepared a decade ago for such a Covid event? Intresting, tell me more.

[@fredp2172]

@@thepope2412 There is zero studies that even concluded that ivermectin is useful for treating covid the best they could come up with is that it was promising but more research was needed.

[@zwerrell]

Should I call the FDA if I see my dad eating horse feed? He often eats it as oatmeal, but its the same formulation that horses eat... just with water and heat.

[@benjammin1001]

Probably not. I'd be surprised if he can get past the first bowl full. I've tried the awesome smelling oat treats from Purina -- especially the Berry flavored ones. So aromatic. They smell so good. But, they taste like gravel. I don't know why my horse likes them so much. If your dad is diabetic, make sure to avoid the sweet feeds... lots of molasses and sugar added as cheap calories. :D

[@REG3305]

Wait.. what is the 5 year results of the safety of the vaccine again? Wait... you don't know. Got it. Good talk....

[@KrikitKaos]

Why five years? That is arbitrary. Why don't you want 80 year safety data? Plus multi-generational safety data so you can protect any future offspring? So you might be able to decide several lifetimes too late whether or not to protect yourself from a virus circulating through society right now cause you have Such Great Big Brain.

[@miguelvaranda7377]

We could say the same for Ivermectin or any other drug treatment. If you want to suffer from long COVID, which actually has been observed to exist then go ahead I guess. Krikit said it perfectly as well.

[@moobiemaykker9639]

... more importantly, you should ask what the 18 month safety of widespread COVID... the answer is 630K Americans have died. take the vaccine.

[@Wow-673]

@@KrikitKaos nah man we gotta wait for the 1000 year trials before even thinking about taking any new drugs. That’s the only way to know for sure. It’s called the Millenium safety protocol.

[@K-bob_45]

@@KrikitKaos 4 years is the average time it takes for long term side effects to show up according the the FDA.

[@ryandugal]

Unsubscribe. Dishonesty about ivermectin.

[@tjb5588]

Show the trials out of India and Brazil! They show excellent results with Ivermectin as part of the treatment... I guess that wouldn't support the narrative though... right? Why would you pick an Iranian study to highlight? Doesn't make any sense?

[@indianmilitary]

Obviously, he is a doctor who blindly supports vaccines.

[@scottmccord7552]

Financial Incentive over lives.

[@janyenyo]

and Zimbabwe

[@donarmstrong5804]

@@janyenyo and slovakia

[@Adyen11234]

Oh, what trials is that? Where can I find the papers for those studies (and I don't mean meta-analysis or any non-official "trials" that can't even list actual numbers of participants+number of people actually taking ivermectin vs not taking it).

[@drunkenoctopus6311]

Ladies and Gentlemen and Others in no particular order.....I give you the future Director of NIAD. Doing what it takes to get to the top. 🙄

[@vietmddds]

What is NIAD?

[@crycry9785]

Well, here in the Philippines. They're using it to treat COVID-19

[@GeoffreyFeldmanMA]

Who are "they" - what medical doctors with what degree? NOTHING AT ALL.

[@sherkirkpatrick8060]

And kits being handed out in India and Mexico City.

[@robinconnelly6079]

@@GeoffreyFeldmanMA incorrect. Google Dr Tess Lawrie. Peer reviewed proof of the efficacy of ivermectin. It is safe and effective

[@robinconnelly6079]

Awesome. Keep talking about it. It works. Here in South Africa too.

[@crycry9785]

@@GeoffreyFeldmanMA a crazy senator here in the Philippines pursued it to be used. And you need to sign a consent letter if your going to use it, so that the responsibility and accountability if chances that you die because of ivermectin won't be shouldered by that dumbass senator.

[@pandadad88]

Hey Dr. Mike. I have to say, I get a little depressed looking at the comments of this video. It's very difficult to get this kind of information on your own, even if it is available. I really appreciate the work that goes into both finding and explaining these studies. I would even be in favor of longer videos that delve deeper. I think what I appreciate most is the unbiased presentation with you preceding what is your opinion with "I think" or "My interpretation of this is-" which prepares us for what's not purely factual, something you don't see from most professional media outlets. So when you see the negative comments from people who treat your information with a tribal mentality, who are upset because you aren't on their side, I really hope you don't get discouraged. I have come to rely on your videos quite a lot and, although you don't owe me anything, I would hate to lose what I consider a vital source of information.

[@beyondspace4088]

Japan's government is now recommending all doctors to treat all covid patients with ivermectin due to high success rate.

[@beyondspace4088]

This has happened after Japan suspended millions of moderna vaccines due to finding melted metals that were attracted using magnets.

[@charleneg.4053]

I don’t think he’ll get discouraged, if anything I think those people encourage him to do his videos

[@guywithjeep]

@@beyondspace4088 lol, melted metals

[@beyondspace4088]

@@guywithjeep TOKYO/ NEW YORK -- About 1.6 million doses of Moderna's coronavirus vaccine have been taken out of use in Japan because of contamination reported in some vials, the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare said early Thursday. Several vaccination centers have reported that vaccine vials contained foreign matter, according to an announcement from the ministry,

[@exhibitD79]

Great video, but I have an issue with one part. Why keep saying ''Not saying it doesn't happen, but I personally haven't seen it"?. Isn't the point of having access to data that we don't need to rely on anecdotal evidence? We DO have data showing people that have taken vaccines have been hospitalized. Why even mention that you have not seen it?

[@delindahess-sump4388]

Also, if the government would allow funding for research on Ivermectin, people wouldn't feel so desperate to take ANIMAL,horse, doses and hurt themselves. We need ALL the tools we can muster.

[@scottypalmer2158]

I smell a rat and the wind is blowing from social media.

[@chaotickreg7024]

9:53 Skip here for the conclusion. You should watch the whole video, but most of it has uncertain language which can be tiring to sit through so there you go.

[@catherinesyme901]

👏👏👏👏

[@Rihardololz]

His standing on fence but leans heavy on shilling vaccines.

[@pyrholorange]

if the government started pushing ivm, there would be ivm hesitancy instead.

[@howardtheduck780]

It won a Nobel prize. It’s not horse paste. It has the ability to pull apart fuzed cells. When you are trying to understand something it helps to break it down to charged particles

[@EnwardSnowman]

That's probably true to some degree. Still... It's been available this whole time, so I'd imagine there were some people who would have jumped at the chance to try it

[@conrad989]

You are certainly correct, but to what magnitude? Ivermectin has been around for four decades, how long has the vaccine been around?

[@Adyen11234]

@@conrad989 Vaccines has been around since the 1800s, so just 2 centuries. Or did you mean the covid vaccine? Cause if you're going to go that far, how long as Ivermectin been used to treat Covid? Either way it's much shorter than vaccines.

[@flurglhinge3051]

@@howardtheduck780 Penicillin also won a Nobel prize. Doesn't mean it's effective in treating Covid.

[@johnact9134]

India had great results in lowering hospitalizations by using a cocktail of Doxycycline, Ivormectin, zinc and vitamin C in widely distributed home kits.

[@BeInCouraged45]

That’s what I got when I got covid plus Vitamin C and D2

[@Tas0228]

The funny thing is two doctors in my clinic (I am a DNP) got it and prescribed this cocktail to themselves and were back to work in a week.

[@acejohnson81]

@@Tas0228 Yeah bs, if they are doctors, and had covid, and returned within one week of testing positive, regardless of how they felt, they should be fired.

[@BthechangeUwishtoC]

@@Tas0228 they got themselves monoclonal antibody treatment, & probebly had been vaccinated, thus mild case. I call bull.

[@johnnypastrana6727]

@@BthechangeUwishtoC aren't you overdue for your third clot shot?

[@joshlineback7761]

there are 44 published, peer-reviewed studies of IVM in COVID - 11 Double blind RCT's, 12 open RCT's, 1 single blind RCT, 2 PSM OCT's- nearly all showing MASSIVE benefits..+ >30 non-RCT's show the exact same. NIH could give a weak/cautious rec.. but wont. Insane.

[@flagmichael]

Yet you don't link to any of them.

[@tuzaguilar4201]

@@flagmichael Fairly easy to find even in the context of YT censorship. Search Dr Been, Dr Campbell, FLCCC, Dr Lawrie. Many videos showing what's included in the meta analysis, what's the confidence level etc. WHO via Andrew Hill actually had more test data early on and his official WHO report showed positive results but with unexpectedly inconsistent conclusion which turned out to be due to UNITAID (research funder) writing the conclusion instead of Dr Hill.

[@Adyen11234]

@@tuzaguilar4201 Videos are not proof of anything other than someone being able to make a video. Please don't take videos as proof of ANYTHING health related. Even those of Dr. Mike should not be taken on face value (but you could search for the studies he noted in 6:30 onwards and make your own decision). Meta analysis are also not scientific papers that should be taken at face value, as they do not need to list their funding and any conflicts of interests. Please only trust actual scientific papers that lists all the required information for it to be an actual scientific paper.

[@skinnygumbo2700]

The number of studies is irrelevant. The most important issue is the quality of those studies. One hundred poor designed experiments published in some obscure journals doesn't equal 2-3 very good articles published in Cell, Nature or Science.

[@jerseytony1]

@@Adyen11234 Right.. Millions of real life testimonials of real people healing with Ivermectin are way way more accurate than Big Pharms trials

[@janemoffitt8078]

Every doctor has their own opinion.. I asked my doctor what he would give me if I got Covid and he told me hydroxychloroquine ivermectin and prednisone. He said he’s been having great success with that combination in his patients. So who do I go with, this doctor or my doctor???

[@cindyblaylock67]

You are going to a good doctor

[@beyondspace4088]

Japan's government is now recommending all doctors to treat all covid patients with ivermectin due to high success rate.

[@beyondspace4088]

This has happened after Japan suspended millions of moderna vaccines due to finding melted metals that were attracted using magnets.

[@janemoffitt8078]

@@beyondspace4088 yikes!! 😬

[@spacetoast7783]

@@beyondspace4088 You're literally just making this up. The government of Japan absolutely does not advise treating covid with ivermectin.

[@cryptomomz8199]

MIKE,I can show you pictures of my best friends husband lying in hospital barely alive after getting to covid shots in April he walked in hospital and now is barely alive on ventilator and feeding tube they placed him on stomach for 2 weeks covid probing which doesn't make sense I feel is extremely dangerous, They place him after 2 weeks on his back like he should've been from the beginning then liver started to fail probably from covid shot as you should know our liver produces hormones for cogualtion regulation.He flat lined 3 days ago...he has a 16 year daughter he is in his early 40s his profession is a correction officers.Personaly from what I've seen ill take ivermectim have 3 tubes of gel paste safer than the jab and covid probing.

[@ChasonBourne78]

So the main risk in taking Ivermectin is overdosage. So does it follow that taking Ivermectin at the right dose should be of no concern since it is a relatively safe drug?

[@osamasyed409]

Yeah if you take it at the correct dose you won't have toxicity. But I'd like to ask you what's the point of taking it anyways? The data shows it doesn't work unless you're treating COVID in a test tube.

[@ChasonBourne78]

@@osamasyed409 But there are also studies that show it works. When you live in a third world country with hospitals at full capacity and little access to vaccines, you need to get your hands on any medicine that can possibly save you.

[@rap3208]

@@ChasonBourne78 The doctor just showed you the studies weren't really done in a scientific and controlled manner, too small to tell the big picture, and wasn't even peer reviewed. You weren't really listening to what was being said, were you? Or you just tuned out as soon as you found out you did not like what he was saying.

[@andyarellanoChannel]

Have you read either the FLCCC treatment guide or that of the AAPS? Do they seem like credible advice coming from known experts in their field. I have a feeling the answers will be no and yes. Given that yes, they are credible, why do you think they have all but been shutdown by their peers many of which work for big business or the government. Why are these alternative treatments so widely used in other countries, which all have lower death rates than the US, and somehow they are not "good enough" for the the CDC and NIH?

[@andyarellanoChannel]

@larry lawrence stay on topic. Have you read either one, I have a feeling the answer is no for you as well. Just take a few minutes to see what the rest of the world is doing and why their results are so much better than ours when we know we literally sink billions into our healthcare.

[@ronarubin]

Yes! They are credible and doing amazing work. For some reason the government agencies don’t want to treat the disease, just prevent. You know what guys, we can do both at the same time!

[@rosalindr4975]

@@ronarubin they want us living in fear and they are profiting from vax .

[@rosalindr4975]

Doesn’t fit the agenda. Fauci should be in jail. Kennedy is writing a book on his treachery. Our soon.

[@andyarellanoChannel]

@larry lawrence please don't read into my comments so deeply. I never said our healthcare system sucks, I did say that it is odd that our death rate is so high given that we literally spend billions on health care and I tried to allude to the fact that it is equally odd that the larger part of organized medicine is completely against anything to help combat covid besides a vaccine. Now what country are you from, let's put your comment about ivermectin and hydroxychlorquine to the test. I'll look around it may be that you just haven't done any serious looking, why? Only you can answer that question.

[@ChaiJung]

The JAMA paper you referenced has had multiple calls for retraction because of its faulty methodology. The 30% PCR study had a control arm of 50% because they used CT based diagnosis which was appropriate early in the pandemic and still is. The meta-analysis you used isn't the one that's being discussed because of the flaws you mentioned; please refer to the Bryant et al one in Am J Ther June 2021 that, when they addressed the problems of Elgazzar, still maintained prophylactic and treatment significance.

[@bryanduchane2371]

Thx for pointing this out. These people all have an agenda. This is their Super Bowl and they are taking full advantage of it!!

[@petitio_principii]

CT diagnosis will give a lot of false positives, so part of an apparent benefit cannot be known to have been really against covid. At the same time, if it came to that point (CT diagnosis), then the window of opportunity for the immune boosting effect would have passed already, the viral load is in sharp decline, the problem is inflammation, to which ivermectin is not known to help, unlike dexamethasone.

[@politicalfoolishness7491]

There is something seriously wrong with the information being given to the people from the beginning. You'd think that they would start with the protocols used for MERS and SARS since they were other respiratory viruses and assume it is airborne. But instead they wanted to start from scratch as if they deliberately wanted to make this worse than it needs to be.

[@einstein6905]

@@petitio_principii treatment involves a multi-pronged approach.

[@EricTheDane]

@@bryanduchane2371 Like the Anti-Vaxx agenda?

[@j.obrien4990]

I know you're a doctor with years of training and great concern for the health of your patients, but I prefer to get my recommendations for health care from politicians that probably own stock in the Ivermectin company and are mostly worried about their next election.

[@wafflesmomforlife9215]

Lol, exactly!

[@dnmurphy48]

Beautifully cynical

[@N8N-Soccer]

I personally would recommend a random celebrity. They tend to know their stuff

[@nosuchthing8]

Best. Comment. Ever. Please fix the your to you're, the grammar nazis will try to use that against you.

[@einstein6905]

@@nosuchthing8 thanks, i was going to do that if you didn't. thanks for having a brain.

[@grahamatsea3575]

How did India crash it's spike in delta case's back in April, IVM is the answer as only about 5% were vaccinated then....

[@ChaiLatte13]

They are estimating 3-5 million folks died during their Delta spike, so it didn't do that good of a job.

[@rosalindr4975]

The government was providing home kits with vitamin c, d, and zinc as well as ivermectin. They stopped when the vaccine became available.

[@grahamatsea3575]

@@ChaiLatte13 that's only slightly up on their normal dealth rate .......in 2017 6.5million died .....that's about 18,000 people per day die in India from all causes. Look away from the toxic main media headlines. India actually has one of the lowest dealth rates for covid as a percentage of their population, leagues ahead of the UK and USA

[@grahamatsea3575]

@@rosalindr4975 they didn't stop when the vaccine became available as roll out wasn't fast enough. The media headlines inferred the vaccine was the saviour, it wasn't .

[@ChaiLatte13]

@@grahamatsea3575 No it is excess deaths or on top of what they normally see. The official C0VID deaths did not capture all of the deaths. That's why researchers look to excess mortality numbers.

[@kennithminnich]

The CDC has just approved Ivermectin... for Afghan refugees!!

[@BREEZEMAYES]

I retired last year after 47 years of MICU nursing at University based centers. Although I still peruse NEJM, JAMA, LANCET, BMJ every week for their articles on Covid, I subscribed to your channel because you remind me of the best of grand rounds and the excellent Pulmonary/Critical Care physicians I have worked with. I look forward for your intelligent articulate yet simplified explanations of current data. Thank you.

[@roberts2364]

If one fully vaccinated individual dies of COVID does that mean the vaccine is ineffective? Help me with the association here

[@frankie3591]

That is why no one Vaccine claims it's 100% effective. Pfizer is 90% against Alpha. We are now on Delta...which I think makes it 70%. Think of Vaccines as Shock absorbers. They help take the shock. Does not mean you can throw the car from Empire State.

[@victoriabarclay3556]

In my opinion, no, because that would be one person out of millions. we'd have to know more about why the person died. we are all biological individuals- that's why covid effects everyone differently.

[@eip3232]

He forgot to mention that Captain Joe Manning used the Horse Ivermectin. Probably bc apparently Ivermectin is "out of stock" everywhere. Which is mathematically impossible. Its been out of stock or nearly impossible to get for months.

[@natalie8NB]

Any updated perspective/reviewed data from TOGETHER trial from McGill/Canada?

[@nnr2dm243]

A one size fits all pharmaceuticals that's safe for everyone slightly alien to the body that will need processing through the liver and kidney in an never-ending cycle simply doesn't exist, for this reason all options should be exhaustively pursued.

[@BigHenFor]

That's the whole point. The studies so far are low grade observational studies. But the shills on social media won't have any of that, and that is frankly suspicious.

[@lingo2025]

Maybe not all options…if you pursue all options, you never accomplish anything. Generally people make educated guesses and pursue options on that basis. For instance, should we spend 10 million dollars to do studies to examine whether intravenous carrots ingestion can cure malaria? It an option that can be classified under the umbrella of all options. You see the logic problem with pursuing all options?

[@MultiSciGeek]

Glad you made an update! I was watching your other Ivermectin video yesterday and there are brand new comments on it saying stuff like "thank god I got it" or "thanks doc for speaking the truth" (both implying that it definitely works for COVID).

[@timbookedtwo2375]

Given the close association of and financial dependency of many researchers with the pharma industry the term "peer reviewed" has lost much of its credibility.

[@user-pr5tx9ep4m]

It essentially means the opposite of what many believe it to mean.

[@auaticamazon]

Why dont you interview Pierre Kory MD please

[@fionasmom6254]

AND Dr. Paul Marik

[@steve0ne11]

Yes exactly! Put your knowledge (bias) to the test.

[@InvestIQ_Keith]

This will NEVER happen.

[@artpatronforever]

Be sure to school India about what works against the Delta Variant. India needs to hear all about it from a slow learner.

[@ryandugal]

Nice.

[@rudolf6547]

Certain states in India like Utar Pradesh now have zero Covid cases after aggressively applying Iverm.

[@Axiomatic75]

I've ordered some anyway, it's a safe drug that's been used for decades so if/when I get Covid, worst case it won't help. What _definitely_ helps is Vitamin C, D and zinc to boost the immune system.

[@johnmaher9462]

It is safe. It is cheap. Why the big push to not at least try it. In many country's it was available over the counter. If people had access to it they could take it at the first sign of symptoms or even exposure. The fight against it makes me think there are ulterior motives at work. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$.

[@gudspellar3605]

Did you watch the video at all? There are two options... a free vaccination or a cheap Ivermectin. The vaccination has been peer reviewed and passed clinical trials... while the Ivermectin is being warned against by the big media with their agenda.

[@Melanie____]

People are trying it anyway. And I think the video said people are not being safe with it. Doctors don’t prescribe things to just try without verification either way (thank goodness!) they would then be responsible for deaths of something not working at their advice. There isn’t any ulterior motive. (I think maybe people who say this watch too many movies or something) everyone is just trying to manage the pandemic the best they know how. And so far vax is proven most effective. There are better easier less dramatic ways to make $$$$$$$$$ than to start a pandemic and try and make people not take horse paste.

[@philbrutsche8928]

You've missed the point of the video. They HAVE tried it. It didn't work.

[@ckit6_fitness]

@@Melanie____ I know like pharma companies have way more effective ways to make money like drugs to treat diseases that cost millions per year

[@Illusionboi0721]

@@philbrutsche8928 Ivermectin is made by a different pharmaceutical, they don't want to invest money on clinical trials on a drug already patented by someone else.

[@Phil58Liew]

What about the success cases in Mexico, Argentina and Uttar Pradesh in India. Surely, the cases of success cannot be pushed under the carpet or ignored

[@klondike444]

Apparently they can, especially with a controlled and now censored media.

[@derekowusu-frimpong2086]

Who would like to see this doctor have a discussion with another doctor who has actually used Ivermectin/Hydroxychloroquine to successfully treat patients?

[@jasonmathias5343]

Here he used peer reviewed studies. You are going to equate peer revered studies with large sample sizes over someones anecdotal opinions?

[@sheilamohammed8306]

This was click bait. I don't know who is clicking thumbs up for this video but he is clearly not educated on Ivermectin nor Hydroxychloroquine. If this is what new young Doctors sound like they can keep them. Where is his critical thinking skills? Did he even research the officer from Georgia? The man used an animal dosage. The FLCCC would buried the guy so Yes I'd love to see him back track this video.

[@timmyburden5701]

Hydroxychloquine shouldn't be used to treat covid. It doesn't work. Per the cdc report on their website. Not to mention the study done in the usa when they used a placebo against Hydroxychloquine. The placebo did just as well. Any doctor recommending that as treatment should be avoided.

[@sheilamohammed8306]

@@timmyburden5701 Yes it does work pull up the interview Dr. Been did with Dr. Chetty for more information. Also, there is nothing the CDC can say at this point I would trust. You do know about their debacle approving an Alzheimer medication that does not work. Look into that and the fact that it did not pass trials it's ultra expensive and board members tops in their fields reigned their seats after voting against it efficacy. Now the CDC is under investigation.

[@timmyburden5701]

@@sheilamohammed8306 The fda approves drugs not the cdc. Dr Been needs to read up on hydroxychloquine because it's been proven not to work as a treatment for covid. I would hope as a dr he reads up on the latest effective treatments for covid.

[@charlesburkhart800]

Doctor Mike Hansen, you have changed your tune over the few months I have listened to you. Someone leaning on you?

[@coryament]

he doesn't want to be canceled

[@pugilist102]

Evidence is leaning on him.

[@Miami1991]

@Doctorpilotspy in the last 12 month we have witnessed things that years ago we would call ludicrious unlikely . Your still calling people conspiracy theorists ?

[@desmondholmes34]

@@Miami1991 another conspiracy theory is how people will be seeing all events said to be conspiracy come to pass and still won't realize it......oh wait 👀😳😂

[@lingo2025]

@@Miami1991 I saw a deer pass by my window at 12:01 am which is clear evidence that Joe Biden is a robot. That deer passed by my window. Can’t you understand that?

[@cscheatum]

Joe Rogan should have you on his show. Too soon?

[@paulak9871]

Joe Rogan took monoclonal antibodies second day of symptoms. Those are shown to help when people take them very early. Same thing Trump and Abbott took, not Ivermectin.

[@williamroberts2478]

@@paulak9871 I heard joe rogan brushed up with a triple vaxxed guy with the shots in his anus and that’s why he’s ok,

[@plav032]

@@paulak9871 Exactly. Those antibody injections give you the antibodies artificially that the vaccine teaches your body to make on its own. Funny how they don't "know" what is an antibody injection, but will take it anyway.

[@paulak9871]

@@plav032 well the worse part is that news headlines focus on the Ivermectin he took, so most ppl will think it is “proof” it works. When they should all be saying rich dude gets covid and immediately gets treated with monoclonal antibody infusions together with vitamin and other care IV infusions and gets better. That’s not the case for his unvaxxed followers. ETA I also guarantee you he didn’t take the horse presentation of Ivermectin.

[@doctorv9336]

@@paulak9871 you wont change any of these peoples minds. Cuz they chose to believe some influencer doctor who is most likely putting his political views first.

[@janeferreira5717]

Check out data on Africa as posted by Johns Hopkins University comparing iver countries deaths with non-iver countries.

[@peterverbeke1383]

would be great if you shared the study

[@janeferreira5717]

@@peterverbeke1383 tried to post johns hopkins graph and another study but won't work

[@m3528i]

Shows a big swath of nations that have very low COVID case counts and they all administer Ivermectin. The surrounding countries that do not provide the drug are all in stark contrast in cases and deaths. Not proof but not one of these horsepaste people will address it.

[@davelawson2564]

@@m3528i But the doc still uses a half baked example which will make Dr fauchi proud of him . Ivermectin is not miracle drug but it works as part of protocol. clearly this nutcase doctor has no clue. And if you have comorbidities and make no effort to address that even the hyped up vaccines cannot save you. I've seen many doctors who promoted vaccines as life saver die of covid even after 2 doses.

[@scarletr.7753]

There is SO much scientific and independent information right now about the efficiency of ivermectin (the pills, NOT the horse paste) in covid19. SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES ABOUT SUCCESSFUL IVERMECTIN USE FOR COVID19 -'Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines ' Conclusions: "Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease". -'Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of adding ivermectin to treatment in severe COVID-19 patients' Conclusions: "According to the findings obtained, ivermectin can provide an increase in clinical recovery, improvement in prognostic laboratory parameters and a decrease in mortality rates even when used in patients with severe COVID-19. Consequently, ivermectin should be considered as an alternative drug that can be used in the treatment of COVID-19 disease or as an additional option to existing protocols". -'A five-day course of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 may reduce the duration of illness' Conclusions: "Virological clearance was earlier in the 5-day ivermectin treatment arm when compared to the placebo group, but this was not the case for the ivermectin + doxycycline arm. There were no severe adverse drug events recorded in the study. A 5-day course of ivermectin was found to be safe and effective in treating adult patients with mild COVID-19." -'Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis' Conclusions: "These findings suggest low to moderate-certainty evidence showing a survival benefit without harm of ivermectin for treatment against covid-19. Low certainty evidence on improvement and deterioration support the possibility of clinical benefit with ivermectin. Low certainty evidence also suggest it could be a useful prophylaxis. Overall, therefore, the evidence suggests that early use of ivermectin may reduce morbidity and mortality from covid-19, based on reductions in covid-19 infections when ivermectin was used as post-exposure prophylaxis, more favourable point estimates for mild to moderate disease compared with severe disease for death due to any cause, and on the evidence demonstrating reductions in the number of patients deteriorating. The evidence on severe adverse events in this review was graded as low certainty, partly because there were too few events to reach statistical significance. However, evidence from a recent systematic review of ivermectin use among people with parasitic infections suggests that ivermectin administered at the usual doses (0.2mg/kg or 0.4mg/kg) is safe and could be safe at higher doses.7,112 A recent World Health Organization document on ivermectin use for scabies found that adverse events with ivermectin were primarily minor and transient." -'Prophylactic Role of Ivermectin in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection Among Healthcare Workers' Conclusion: "Two doses of oral ivermectin (300 μg/kg/dose given 72 hours apart) as chemoprophylaxis among HCWs reduced the risk of COVID-19 infection by 83% in the following month. Safe, effective, and low-cost chemoprophylaxis has relevance in the containment of pandemic alongside vaccine". -'Medical Safety of Ivermectin- comprehensive review of safety' Conclusion: “Ivermectin human toxicity cannot be claimed to be a serious cause for concern.” -'Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 63 studies' Conclusions: "Meta analysis using the most serious outcome reported shows 69% [54‑79%] and 86% [75‑92%] improvement for early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results after exclusion based sensitivity analysis and restriction to peer-reviewed studies or Randomized Controlled Trials. Statistically significant improvements are seen for mortality, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. 29 studies show statistically significant improvements in isolation". -'Exploring the binding efficacy of ivermectin against the key proteins of SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis: an in silico approach' Conclusions: "The present study depicts comparative binding efficacy of a promising FDA-approved drug, ivermectin, against major pathogenic proteins of SARS-CoV-2 and their human counterparts involved in host-pathogen interaction. Herein, our in silico data have indicated that ivermectin efficiently utilizes viral spike protein, main protease, replicase and human TMPRSS2 receptors as the most possible targets for executing its antiviral efficiency. Therefore, ivermectin exploits protein targets from both virus and human, which could be the reason behind its excellent in vitro efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 as reported by Caly et al. In this context, ivermectin could be an effective option as well. Considering all these facts, the present study explores the therapeutic targets of ivermectin against SARS-CoV-2 and enlightens the possibility of using this drug in COVID-19 clinical trials shortly". -'The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro' Conclusions: The results showed that this drug is a potent inhibitor of SARS-Cov-2. Ivermectin causes 5000x reduction in viral RNA during two days, which requires future clinical investigation in humans "We report here that Ivermectin, an FDA-approved anti-parasitic previously shown to have broad-spectrum anti-viral activity in vitro, is an inhibitor of the causative virus (SARS-CoV-2), with a single addition to Vero-hSLAM cells 2 h post infection with SARS-CoV-2 able to effect ~5000-fold reduction in viral RNA at 48 h. Ivermectin therefore warrants further investigation for possible benefits in humans". -'The mechanisms of action of Ivermectin against SARS-CoV-2: An evidence-based clinical review article' Conclusions: "Considering the urgency of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, simultaneous detection of various new mutant strains and future potential re-emergence of novel coronaviruses, repurposing of approved drugs such as Ivermectin could be worthy of attention". (1/2)