@@ScorchZane8:06 this is one of the reasons why I decided to change Hiro, Hank, Connor and Caitlin’s designs in my au Since I mentioned Hiro, Conner and Caitlin to you earlier, I’ll just tell you that Hank’s an LNER O7 in my au
@dylanlyles9453Ай бұрын
I don't mind Edward and James having Fowler tenders, and I like your idea for Gordon and Henry's tenders
@WanderleyProductions60533Ай бұрын
4:15Well, I guess that henry will be very cursed with a fowler tender. 5:12 But gordon with a stanier tender.... That IS lovely.
@chavopatyfanstudios2005Ай бұрын
Thank god the tvs changed the desgin of Gordon's tender
@ARandomThomasFanАй бұрын
I’d say they’re custom built tenders or something, sort of as a mark of distinction from other railways (despite similar tenders existing)
@westinbridges7321Ай бұрын
In my alternate Sodor universe, the only engine who has a Fowler Tender (at least currently, I've only done up to the first 7, maybe 8, books) is Edward. He was given a Fowler tender after his exploit in 1965. While he was being rebuilt, he got the LMS Fowler tender (which taken from an already withdrawn LMS Fowler 4F) to replace his original one (in my head AU, Edward is a Furness 120/K1 class), which at this point was almost completely worn out. As for Henry, Gordon, and James: Henry is a pure Black 5 in my AU (so he keeps his Black 5 tender with the rest of his Black 5 components), Gordon was sent back to Doncaster to receive LNER A3 modifications at some point after January 1947 (so he got the LNER group standard 6-wheeled tender), and James (being a G&SWR 403 in my AU), keeps his original G&SWR tender. I may update this comment later on, but for now, this is where the tender engines currently stand in my AU.
@user-bx6tl3dx9mАй бұрын
I like here peoples au's :)
@LBSC70Ай бұрын
In the books and show Gordon's Fowler/maunsell styled tender is comparably bigger in size that Edward or James' tender
@Lookoutforthetrain2010Ай бұрын
In my headcanon during the time where Henry was at crew after his crash the LMS who ran the trains to the island thanks to the agreement the LMS sent a black five tender to the island and it would be used for Gordon…
@jaanshersaeed4541Ай бұрын
Wasn’t thinking about the other big tender engines in the show with larger tenders (Murdoch Neville Hank and Hiro) but I guess later on Sir Topham Hatt would be like “eh screw it they can keep their tenders and I don’t wanna bother with getting replacements as it’s too time consuming and they’re already there” and he wouldn’t need to replace every tender type while with Spencer Connor and Caitlin as they’re already on the Mainland and not NWR-owned this wouldn’t apply to them and it’s much bigger there anyways.
@monarchvh8593Ай бұрын
I like to think Edward and James were given fowlers for longer trips and to stop less frequently on the mainline. Gordon and Henry already got larger tenders so they didn’t need fowlers, and when Donald and Douglas joined the railway, BR didn’t have many fowlers as for spares due to them being mostly used as storage or being scrapped
@tjmfarming9584Ай бұрын
I've found not only does the physical size for a tender such as the fowler and Maunsell tenders play a role, but also the height and width of the footplate for such tenders can make it fit, look dinky, or in some instances with little 2-6-0, 4-4-0, and 0-6-0's with low footplates, make the engine look as though it's got a turtle shell on its back. Hence why when I make head canons for my fictional lines in Trainz, I set it up so that when it comes time to set a standard tender, I pick out 2 or 3 I like with the same footplate height and capacity etc and put it behind the locos with that footplate height. if that particular tender fits all the locos, I test it with, it goes through to the next round, so on and so forth until I find a tender that suits these engines as standard. After which I'd go and reskin that tender or loco accordingly to suit the livery I'm after. E.g. Running a M&SWJR 2-6-0 with a GER Holden 2640-gallon tender, or a Gresley D49 with the tender off a Highland Clan class.
@marcust5327Ай бұрын
they leave a fouler taste in my mouth
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
oh damn nice
@johnathonmcjohn3Ай бұрын
*i see what you did there*
@therailwaymen2203Ай бұрын
8:23 The NWR is pretty accident prone, if the tender Gordon came with got damaged, it would be a bit harder to repair, my guess is that they created their own tenders in the Fowler tender style, (since both Edward and James both had Fowler tenders) this would probably fix the issue with the tenders being too short. Henry’s tender could have been an experiment, its result were mostly positive, but the NWR never got around to change every single tender engines’ tender When all those newer, bigger engine came along, the North Western probably had a lot more money, which is why they never bothered to change the tenders from then on out, that would explain why Henry’s tender still hasn’t changed much even after the newer engines came to Sodor.
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
@@therailwaymen2203 honestly love the idea you presented.
@keldeostudies149Ай бұрын
My idea of the fowler tender is that their simply backup tenders. Lemme explain... The fowler tenders are a back up for in a tender engine is damaged or involved in a accident where the tender engine is lightly damage but the tender engine is heavily damage, this is why sir topham hatt brought a few spare fowler tenders from the scrapyard during the early days of dieselization. This is where the 6 "lovely" tenders originally came from and why they look run down, they weren't in use yet and in my head cannon series three of the fowler tenders are painted and have 2, 9, and 10 which are made for edward, donald, and Douglas if they ever have a accident, donald would even receive one in my rough adaption of twin troubles after his accident at the start of the episode In a way it's like a wheelchair, a cast, or a prosthetic arm for engines and it's even more truer to the point sense the engines in question using them are given lighter work (in the early days) either from the fowler tender or it was because of the tender engine accident after math. For a time the tender engines would say it was like wearing a cast, they couldn't do as much work in the early days because how the tenders were pretty much patched together and not properly maintain due to sodor adapting to mordenization and the now rising expense to repair engines let alone a single tender out of the tons sir topham hatt brought A engine couldn't do as much work and the time they need a tender one or maybe at rare times two of them were being worked on or finished but in use so they had to use one of the spare tenders from the yard itself... "Oh man it itches!" One would say "it's very clunky and cumbersome" said another "I rather wait on the sidelines then go another inch with this tender!" He would continued Some ghost stories would be spread on the tenders being haunted as a nodding reference the creepy fan story "six lovely tenders" but its not true only a silly story made to scare the daylights out of people and engines Over the years and some decades and the more money sir topham hatt gain he managed to earn enough money to repair the tenders at a much faster rate things to a collab with the sodor ironworks, now the tenders were fully restored and no engine would complain about them and they could do any work they would do without much issue or complaint... well not much anyway~ "This tender looks so dinky on me...?!" Said Murdock
@delticproductionsАй бұрын
In my AU, Sodor is jointly owned by the LMS (not that different from the S&DJR). Tenders, therefore, were commissioned by the LMS, and the Sudrian region of LMS were presented with Fowler tenders. Sodor was a small island and most tender engines on the line at this point were mostly 0-6-0s, such as 4Fs. Later on though these tenders were fazed out by Stanier tenders and later some BR tenders. Also yes this means that in my headcanon, Sodor is under BR and is victim to the modernisation plan. Only a lucky handful of engines were saved for preservation.
@RicardoGaming09Ай бұрын
My takes on edward, henry, gordon, james, Donald/Douglas' tenders Edward: LMS Fowler tender- he got it after Rescuing james his old one was scrapped Henry- LMS 4000 Stanier tender- he got it after his final rebuild by Stanier Gordon- LNER Peperccon tender- he got it after his Peperccon rebuild James- SR Maunsell tender- he got after the war (the second one) Donald/Douglas- CR tender- they got it when they were built
@Max_The_LNER_C1Ай бұрын
I like to think in my head cannon that they keep their original tenders, let’s say Gordon had the tender or tenders used on the a1 form of great northern and other A1s and A3s, the only change I would make is that Edward would have a maunsell tender
@lennyzagara460022 сағат бұрын
Personally it’s extremely simple for me both Edward & James have Fowler tenders simple. As for Henry he has a Stanier tender also simple. In my head canon (my favorite character) Gordon is an A3 basically what the Unlucky Tug did with one minor difference but yeah my version of Gordon is an A3 with a Group Standard tender easy.
@elygennari4435Ай бұрын
The reason why we later see tender engines with big tenders is because they are visitors.
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
Then Henry shouldn’t be on Sodor then going by that logic
@chavopatyfanstudios2005Ай бұрын
@@ScorchZanetbh i hate that logic in the rws
@SabhiyaAnsari-f3wАй бұрын
I really agree that sodor is small island that the NWR don't need bigger tenders due to because the mainline short distance that's why engines in the north western railway would allow them to wear fowler tenders
@jaanshersaeed4541Ай бұрын
Huh, guess it’s possible Payne based the tenders of the Maunsell tenders but I wonder why Henry had a full block for a tender instead of one as well but lets look back; After William Middleton, there was Payne who illustrated book 2 published in 1946 and then Dalby who published books 3 in 1948 and 4 (where Henry did have a Fowler tender this time) in 1949 where he used the designs of Payne. In books 2 and 3 Henry did not appear fully yet and was obscured more in the sheds while Edward Gordon and James appeared fully. Dalby was then commissioned to re-illustrate both books TTTE in 1950 and TTRE in 1949 with Henry fully appearing and as Dalby was just redoing the illustrations of Middleton’s work he figured as Henry had a regular block tender there he’d still be illustrated with one and it’s also possible as there were already issues with Henry looking almost exactly like Gordon Dalby figured a different tender design could be something to at least help there be slightly less confusion.
@FlyingFoxProductions8995Ай бұрын
Honestly James and Edward have Maunsell tenders, Gordon has the 4000 gallon tender and Henry has a normal black 5 tender
@bennickssАй бұрын
Stanier 4000 gallon tender, not "a normal black 5 tender"
@FictionalADDONАй бұрын
Donald and Douglas also gained Fowler tenders in the RWS. To me I don’t think they’re compatible with larger engines.
@ZainsTrains15 күн бұрын
I believe that since Gordon’s an experimental engine by the LNER. The LNER gave him an experimental tender. Later at crewe since they’re a scrapyard they took an old tender off a scrap engine and put it on Gordon. Scrap engine in question? An LNER B1 class engine. This engine caused mayhem on the LNER until, in 1930 Harvley ( not a typo that’s literally the name 😂, btw is the scrap engine ) crashed two female teak coaches into Doncaster works at 45 MPH. Both coaches died leaving the D16 (Liam) in depression. Liam was later sold for scrap in 1956. So Gordon’s tender was an experimental now a B1, Henry was his experimental one now stanier black 5 one, and James & Edward have Fowler tenders. That’s my head canon. (Sorry for the long story 😅)
@ScorchZane15 күн бұрын
@@ZainsTrains interesting explaination makes sense to give him an experimental tender
@user-bx6tl3dx9mАй бұрын
in my au, Edward is a Lner d40 and does have a Fowler tender, but only after Old Iron happens. And James also has a Fowler tender after being repaired after his first day crash. But in my au, Henry and Gordon both have Stanier Tenders, Henry has one cuz of his rebuild, and Gordon has one cuz of him getting his Stanier cylinders and motion, and he needed a new tender instead of the old Gnr one, so he got a Stanier tender.
@user-ii6df9ei1gКүн бұрын
Edward should have a Fowler tender after The Flying kipper happens
@user-ii6df9ei1gАй бұрын
7:11 we finally found The real Old Shape Henry
@mrjollyschoctanker3926Ай бұрын
8:18 when Sir Topham hat bought them they had their big tenders and it wouldn't make sense just to change it since it would be a waste of money. Not only that engines might need bigger tender for more coal and water incase they take in more fuel since they are bigger and/or heavy freight or passenger engines
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
honestly good point I actually agree
@ryleeculla5570Ай бұрын
Railway series Edward is just a K2 with a raised boiler
@keanes8608Ай бұрын
Henry’s tender isn’t even a fowler one, following his rebuild into a black 5 he’s drawn with the right type of tender. I’d say it’s a bit more hard to notice at some angles though. In the later books I’d boil it down to illustration differences.
@BlockedUser420Ай бұрын
I always imagined the engines would've kept their original tenders like gordon would've kept his GNR gresley tender instead of using a fowler or stannier tender, james keeps his L&YR hughes tender, etc. However henry does change tender as he was completely rebuilt into a Black 5.
@slowcoachstudios_2021Ай бұрын
How I see it for the TVs, Murdoch, Hank and Hiro are like heavy haulers so they would need more fuel to account for the weight of their fright. And Neville’s tender is big, but it is also stubby in length, meaning it would fit the needs of his work. With Conner and Caitlin, seeing as they are American built, it would look really weird if the crew slapped a Fowler tender on them and since they’re American, they may not be able to use English tenders due to their size with out major modifications.
@BrentSudricАй бұрын
With digital scaling, I try to line up the buffers of both images to be as accurate as possible.
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
tbh I more or less try to line with the wheels but not a bad idea tbh
@TaG.189Ай бұрын
I personally like the fact that the tvs used bigger tenders for gordon and henry, more coal and water for multiple journeys after all sodor isnt that big that it needs it's engines to fuel at each station so the engine doesnt risk running dry, you could fuel up at the top station do two journeys or so and then refuel for the next ones, also i personally like idea of gordon having a unrebulit stanier tender.
@DennisLora2001Ай бұрын
I'm impressed with this one well done Scorch 1:00
@MSCPictures64Ай бұрын
Well I prefer Henry with a Stanier tender, because it’s the right size for him, and he also has one in my headcannon too, and may I ask you this, when are you going to get back to Your ideal videos? (I hadn’t seen you make one of these since February)
@greenturtlgaming2554Ай бұрын
You forgot to point out the fact that Gordon’s tender is larger than an actual Fowler tender.
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
@@greenturtlgaming2554 well real life that wouldn’t be the case so there’s that
@greenturtlgaming2554Ай бұрын
@@ScorchZane True. BTW: Idea for next video: Basis of faceless road vehicles. I narrowed down STH’s car in Season 1 to be a Rover P3.
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
@@greenturtlgaming2554 good idea but I mostly interested on rails (but I can try)
@greenturtlgaming2554Ай бұрын
@@ScorchZane Thank you.
@CandleheadandGregoryFanАй бұрын
Gordon has a Fowler Tender in my AU And so do James and Donald But Edward Henry and Douglas don't
@lindseypapakirk97Ай бұрын
So I do have a headcannon for this and it goes like this. If the engine is small or medium say for example Edward and pulls shorter trains than it doesn't need a tender that's massive but for engines that are larger like Hank and pull larger trains than they do need larger tenders. Now this explanation does have holes like why does Neville have a bigger tender? Also obviously this is just my headcannon.
@BANANAsuit231Ай бұрын
Henry didn’t have a Fowler tender, he had a normal lms tender
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
@@BANANAsuit231 the illustrations spoke otherwise (I know some of the illustrations are inaccurate, but I don’t fully take it 100% at face value, due to Awdry justifying Henry looking similar to Gordon.)
@ryanlee5512Ай бұрын
I personally follow the headcanon made by RhysBDavies is that Gordon and Henry uses the SUPER fowler tenders aka 4000 gallons version as its bigger and fits their heights, conveniently there were 2 of them and they were scrapped in 1935 (the same year of the kipper crash).
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
custom built variants of the Fowler tenders, interesting
@newobanproductions999Ай бұрын
@@ScorchZane There were also high-sided Fowler tenders which have the outline of the Stanier tenders we all know and love. And you couldn't think the Fowler tenders couldn't get any stranger.
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
American tenders: are we jokes to you?
@Kenzo171325 күн бұрын
If the flowler tender is far to small than just resized it
@ScorchZane25 күн бұрын
@@Kenzo1713 or maybe have other tenders on Sodor, there.
@pootispow0Ай бұрын
8:20 and how would a fowler tender even be attached to murdoch
@sunnygappy9717Ай бұрын
7:57 Fuel consumption yeah Some are eater some not
@mattevans4377Ай бұрын
Let's be honest, the illustrations are really inconsistent (even with the illustrations used in this image), and we have no clue what their actual tenders are.
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
well it didn’t stop Awdry from justifying some. (I might make a on video in the illustrations topic one day, but idk)
@RoomsAdventurerАй бұрын
Here is what I think So first let me just say that Henry has his black 5 tender so he wont be included But for the others, I dont think they have tenders from other railways, but ones built by the NWR So they would have 2 tender types, the first is Gordon's tender, and the second is what James and Edward have I think this because well, I dont feel that the engine's tenders really look like the fowler tenders, they look too short, or for Gordon, too big
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
hmmm interesting assessment
@GARILENAАй бұрын
I feel like gordon fits with a streamlined lner non corridor tender
@TheSudrianTerrier653Ай бұрын
1:28 *YOOOOOOO!!!** *THATS ME*
@chavopatyfanstudios2005Ай бұрын
Can the maunsell tender work on Gordon and henry
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
I mean sort of can
@chavopatyfanstudios2005Ай бұрын
@@ScorchZane in my universe Gordon's tender is a hybrid of lner group standard tender and mansuell tender but resembles a fowler tender
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
@@chavopatyfanstudios2005 oh nice
@chavopatyfanstudios2005Ай бұрын
@@ScorchZane also his tender (which is in its tvs design) looks bigger than James and Edwards tenders
@TheSudrianGraceАй бұрын
i headcanon that henrys full name would be henry stanier fouler gresly yes he has 2 middle names
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
hmmm interesting
@ryleeculla5570Ай бұрын
Dinky? DINKY MORE LIKE UN DIGNIFIED
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
@@ryleeculla5570 damn nice joke
@ryleeculla5570Ай бұрын
@@ScorchZaneI meant it genuinely but eh you can call it by that
@SomeGuynamedOttoАй бұрын
Hooray!
@jonathanperez2320Ай бұрын
You have to use a b1 tender or green arrow tender to make it the perfect height
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
@@jonathanperez2320 i mean works too
@FictionalADDON22 күн бұрын
A Fowler tender for Henry to me is a bit off because I seen a LMS Jubilee class with said Fowler tender and it fits. Also could you do a topic about Henry being a Stanier Black 5 or a Jubilee.
@ScorchZane22 күн бұрын
@@FictionalADDON oh hell yeah imma do that
@dappertrainsАй бұрын
Ngl for me IDC which tender is for who, the tenders are fine atleast if it’s not on a tank engine with coal bunker WITH A TENDER. if it’s a tender it’s a tender for a tender engine (my opinion)
@Wik94Ай бұрын
for me, henry with stanier tender is better. That makes him 96% Stanier black five. As for gordon, i think A3 tender.
@ryleeculla5570Ай бұрын
Are you sure that the NWR didn’t just modify their fouler tenders the railway is pretty small for a A3 an a black 5 so they wouldn’t need to have their normal tenders you see in real life that would be a pit overkill
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
@@ryleeculla5570 there’s no information that suggest that in the offical lore, tho it does make for a good head canon or I guess Alternate Universe
@ryleeculla5570Ай бұрын
@@ScorchZane still it’s an idea Gordon was given modifications Edward Henry (Henry isn’t a black five he’s just built like one)
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
@@ryleeculla5570 then again so was any other engine, James and even Thomas. (Ok so doesn’t stop me from using it for Henry)
@user-ii6df9ei1gАй бұрын
My james is an lms 4f so he uses a fowler tender
@user-en9xn2pt5iАй бұрын
Nice
@Swag_K1RBYАй бұрын
I thought Henry had the actual black 5 tender???
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
In christoper’s books and even in later Wilbert books, he was later illustrated with a Fowler Tender.
@keanes8608Ай бұрын
@@ScorchZane I think for Clive’s illustrations it’s due to inconsistency. As his tender style switches often (like how Thomas had the running board dip in some illustrations). And Edwards illustrations are more about the angle. You look at the lining, overall it’s less exaggerated in some illustrations.
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
@@keanes8608then again Awdry did justify a few illustrations
@Dominic_812Ай бұрын
Personally I prefer Edward and James to have there original tenders as well as Gordon and Henry because I never liked the Fowler tender look and thought they looked to cartoonish.
@user-ii6df9ei1g11 күн бұрын
I prefer Edward and James to have Maunsell tenders because they fowler tenders look to standard gauge
@colinlayton9114Ай бұрын
This is a little question. What is your thought on the half engine and its adaptations? I just wanted to know.
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
@@colinlayton9114 honestly not a bad idea, it’s actually an interesting idea there is one adaptation I remember that was really well done (I believe one by the user “bogie” because he went all out with his adaptation of the creepy story. However the others feel like they were very toned down)
@colinlayton9114Ай бұрын
@@ScorchZane Glad to give you an idea buddy.
@user-ii6df9ei1g25 күн бұрын
5:15 i don't think Gordon looks good with a stanier tender, he has a Group Standard LNER Tender or a V2 tender
@ScorchZane25 күн бұрын
@@user-ii6df9ei1g In canon (at least.. according to the official IOS Book it was said he was somehow fitted with a Fowler tender. Like it or not he would’ve been given one or the other at Crewe.)
@user-kf8yx1mm8cАй бұрын
Good good
@chavopatyfanstudios2005Ай бұрын
Hey can the fowler tenders work For the b12s B16s Lner k1s And the b4s
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
idk, I recommend getting any drawings of those classes put them into an editing software, slap the Fowler style behind them and see how I would go.
@shinythomas8856Ай бұрын
Scorch, About One Of My Comments, Scorch, You Know That Comment That Said That Henry was Rebuilt in 1935, Not 1992, Well He Got A Double Chimney In 1992 So Yea
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
@@shinythomas8856 well I’m at least you acknowledge it. Otherwise I didn’t know he got a double chimney in 1992.
@shinythomas8856Ай бұрын
Thx 😊
@andreiemanueltudose2445Ай бұрын
To be honest i don't really care about engines tenders how they look to be honest
@Pro_gamer236Ай бұрын
My gordon uses a corridor tender and my henry use his black five tender and edward and james keep they original tender
@user-ii6df9ei1gАй бұрын
Gordon does not use a corridor tender nowadays. your Gordon should use a group standard tender and Edward and James should have fowler tenders
@user-ii6df9ei1gАй бұрын
@@Pro_gamer236 that looks weird because Gordon with a Corridor tender looks 100% and A1/A3 and James and Edward with their original tenders look 100% a l&YR Class 28 and a furness railway k2, SO i think Gordon James and Edward should use A fowler tenders. And Henry has a 4000 Gallon Stanier tender
@Pro_gamer236Ай бұрын
@@user-ii6df9ei1g i know that just so used to them like because when I did drawing of them first time I got so used of them looking like that why I drawn them like that
@chavopatyfanstudios2005Ай бұрын
@@user-ii6df9ei1gfowler tender for Gordon is small
@user-ii6df9ei1g29 күн бұрын
@@Pro_gamer236 i think Gordon does not have fowler tenders nor corridor tenders, i think Gordon fits with a group standard tender because in My alternate sodor universe James and Edward have Fowler tenders and My take On Gordon's tender Is the group standard tender in 1939 Gordon had a rebuilt and His tender was replaced with a group standard tender because he couldn't need an 8 wheels corridor tender and please your drawing replaced gordon's tender with a group standard tender and replaced Edward and James's tenders with Maunsell tenders
@elygennari4435Ай бұрын
Gordon with a black 5 tender looks ugly. The v1 tender suits him a bit more.
@user-ii6df9ei1g2 күн бұрын
The Stanier tender looks good behind tender a little bit*
@jgfm8330Ай бұрын
Can you shoutout me in your next episode
@E2TankengineFr19 күн бұрын
Never gonna give you up Never gonna Let you down
@chavopatyfanstudios2005Ай бұрын
Can a b16 wore a b12 tender
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
@@chavopatyfanstudios2005 maybe
@chavopatyfanstudios2005Ай бұрын
@@ScorchZane is there a picture of that
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
@@chavopatyfanstudios2005 idk you tell me you’re one with the idea
@chavopatyfanstudios2005Ай бұрын
@@ScorchZane well you used one when you made your alfred is not 98462 video
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
@@chavopatyfanstudios2005 I don’t recall doing that (I only recall using A1 Henry with the B16 tender)
@user-ii6df9ei1gАй бұрын
#SecondHandGNRTender
@BombyJoinedDaFightАй бұрын
I’m fine the fowler tenders.. why are ppl making such a big deal about it.. like my god y’all are overreacting..
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
Ok doesn’t mean I like them, and I do have one reason. When I was making my Alternate Universe some of my takes on characters (like on Gordon or even Edward) don’t have Fowler tenders, there one user who bothering me a lot about whether my ideal tender engine characters do get Fowler tenders. Which is frustrating because I made it clear in my AU not every engine aside from my ideal Henry MK2 won’t have Fowler tenders.) Well it’s not overreacting when others have perspective (unless they don’t give a reason for why, or are overplaying one aspect.) besides how am I overreacting
@BombyJoinedDaFightАй бұрын
@@ScorchZane You made a whole ass video where you talk only about the fowler tenders 💀
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
@@BombyJoinedDaFight so I’m not allowed to speak topics or anything in my videos? Not even calmly? Tbh this argument is kinda weak, because this same comment can apply to any Thomas video as a whole. Like whether Topham is right or not in a certain film… or if this film was horrible or not.
@BombyJoinedDaFightАй бұрын
@@ScorchZane wait we were arguing? And even if we were we’re just arguing over tenders of all things so what’s the big deal 🤦♂️
@ScorchZaneАй бұрын
@@BombyJoinedDaFight you tell me you said “I’m overreacting”. Yet… I didn’t even shout or speak like a rang a tang… Like… allow me to ask you again… how is me talking about something or sharing my opinion is considered overreacting? And nothing I’m not saying it’s a big deal I’m just speaking for my perception, you’re speaking like I’m not allowed to share my point of view. Honestly you’re sounding like your getting defensive by saying “I’m over reacting”, that’s what I can argue with you.