Germany: Why do the French get to militrize the Rhineland? Belgium, and France: *Shut up slave!*
@Jack2094 жыл бұрын
Literally every "demilitarized" zone in history was one of the most heavily militarized places in the world.
@ApersonIguess-rb6fu4 жыл бұрын
@@Jack209 the irony
@getmeoutofsanfrancisco99173 жыл бұрын
They aren't. The *borders* around said DMZ are what are heavily militarized. A DMZ is just a zone typically around national borders where a mutual agreement is made in order to forbid military instillations within said zone. When you *approach* (but not enter) a DMZ on a hostile border, there will typically be many military instillations, but within said DMZ itself, there will (or should be) none. Unless it is violated which does happen. /Definitions
@scintillam_dei3 жыл бұрын
Why is it you can't say crap without rap?
@unclenogbad15093 жыл бұрын
I remember an interview with an old German lady who had been a young girl at the time of the inflation. She and her mother had gone shopping, struggling under the weight of their basket-load of money. They saw a crowd gathering at the baker's, so put down the load and rushed to see what was on sale. When they got back, the money was there, but somebody had stolen the basket.
@kaputtesrollo27562 жыл бұрын
Actually I still have a 5 Billion Reichsmark (only one banknote)
@zhouwu2 жыл бұрын
@@kaputtesrollo2756 How much is it worth?
@kaputtesrollo27562 жыл бұрын
@@zhouwu Today it's nothing
@charu20592 жыл бұрын
@@kaputtesrollo2756 You could use it as toilet paper or make an airplane.
@kaputtesrollo27562 жыл бұрын
@@charu2059 I could (due to its value) but I think its a historical item I should keep ^^
@Guns_Blazin5 жыл бұрын
“Every man a millionaire”- German Huey Long
@Marinealver5 жыл бұрын
A million pennies is still $10,000. A million Dongs on the other hand.
@bluefiregaming40375 жыл бұрын
Huey Long Dong***
@merrittanimation77215 жыл бұрын
And no one wears a Pickelhaube
@UnfairEnforcer5 жыл бұрын
A worthless millionaire is a millionaire nonetheless
@jonasb1045 жыл бұрын
@@HighFlyingOwlOfMinerva um, Gustav Stresemann would like to talk to you from his grave. ;)
@janpiorko38095 жыл бұрын
"France felt that any breach of the Treaty of Versailles should be met with firm action" Ohhh, the irony...
@marlonmoncrieffe07285 жыл бұрын
Actually, if the allies had been more rational about war reparations, the Ruhr Valley occupation AND the second World War could have been avoided.
@marlonmoncrieffe07285 жыл бұрын
@@atlasbailly5439 ...Or just being more rational about forcing one country to pay back everything. But alas, Britain and France wanted their pound of flesh... Then again, maybe you were right and should have dismantled Germany so they would no longer be on the hook for all those unfair payments.
@helmuthvonmoltke55185 жыл бұрын
@@atlasbailly5439 Well, we can argue in the same way about the congress of Vienna. If the coallition had ripped France apart than there would be no Napoleon III, no Franco - prussian war and no French revisionism that led - among others - to the outbreak of WW1. So no, if the allies had treated Germany more gentle than the western Integration of the country would had played out more accordingly. The peace treaty - and especially Frances behaviour - was more or less responsible for the rise of Hitler and his Nazi thugs. Incidently; Europe after the war needed a strong and peacefull Germany. Its a shame that France insisted on a weak and helpless Germany.
@atlasbailly54395 жыл бұрын
@Ivan Ricaña how in gods name is the french navy supposed to help in a war against germany. they share a massive common border and the germans were not very reliant on foreign supplies, as illustrated in the first and second world wars. in 1940 the definitive command of the sea held by the brits and french could not prevent the fall of france in the slightest. the tanks of the french were far inferior in number and organization to those of the germans. in addition, the germans had absolute command of the sky, which is incredibly important and made up a large portion of german military strength and strategy. you have made two points which completely ignore the simple fact that the germans completely dwarfed the french in terms of industrial output, population, and land based military power.
@NoahWeaverRacing5 жыл бұрын
Ivan Ricaña Naval Power is only so effective. The fact that France was drastically outnumbered in Air power, manpower, and equipment such as tanks meant they could not keep up. Not having Britain to cover a portion of the Belgian border would have made a bad situation worse.
@sakuraaaa1015 жыл бұрын
Debt: *exists* Germany: so anyway I started printing
@NoahWeaverRacing5 жыл бұрын
MarchBloxBoy theone this meme was getting old but this revived it a little for me 😂
@martinbernardino15 жыл бұрын
Venezuela: Are you challenging me
@garrettallen74275 жыл бұрын
Noah Weaver Argentina: *YOU DARE OPPOSE ME MORTAL?!*
@Joesolo134 жыл бұрын
If you have uncontrollable debt it's actually a pretty big brained move You destroy your own currency and go 'well that sucks guys!', adopt another country's currency for a few years and then start yours back up pegged to it until you're pretty sure things will be stable.
@legooperator84434 жыл бұрын
@bloxboy 1 Yeah lol
@Matty112uk5 жыл бұрын
love the writing scrawled over the picture of the former Kaiser: 'Unter neuer leitung' - 'Under new management' 😂
@breaderikthegreat32243 жыл бұрын
You have freed us
@beefyblom2 жыл бұрын
@@breaderikthegreat3224 Eher wie - unter neuer leitung
@TheRhysj55 жыл бұрын
I was super against you changing from 10 minute videos to this. But now I look forward to them
@Sim4oo5 жыл бұрын
I agreee with you,but do be fair,if videos were still 10 minutes long,uploads were to be for sure not so frequent.
@Wm7forthewin5 жыл бұрын
same
@gr33kwarrior5 жыл бұрын
When you say the German government did print money just to pay their bills you're at least oversimplifying. It's obvious from the beginning that it won't solve your problems even with the least economical knowledge. Or you're claiming that the people in charge were just idiots which is unlikely. So to me there's no question wether inflation was planned. You could still argue about the extent of inflation planned ofc since once started it was like an avalanche effect building up more and more.
@nathanielmorgan7324 жыл бұрын
It works well for making single event videos.
@receivedbeans85554 жыл бұрын
Erik Dorbandt never underestimate the stupidity of politicians
@icrushchildrensdreams45565 жыл бұрын
“State of Emergency” *how funny the FIRE ALARM JUST WENT OFF*
@tjb_62035 жыл бұрын
*HAHAHAHHAHAH LMAOOO*
@blazingfish84863 жыл бұрын
*I CANT BELIEVE IT*
@no1ofconsequence9363 жыл бұрын
This explains so much about how Nazi Germany was able to get away with so many early treaty violations. It's hard to believe this isn't in more discussions of the leadup to WWII. Edit: I refer to the French occupation, not the inflation. I knew about that. It's just that the actions of the French here make it understandable that some folks would let things slide if it would be good for Germany. Then they decided things were getting out of hand, but you know.
@looinrims3 жыл бұрын
It’s because no one understands seemingly how important economies are
@anonymouscausewhynot3 жыл бұрын
@@looinrims well, unless your country is in economic crisis.
@looinrims3 жыл бұрын
@@anonymouscausewhynot nah people still don’t get it, as they cry for social welfare programs that are the reason the coffers are dry (or a big reason in many cases), Argentina isn’t having fun for many reasons but the out of control spending doesn’t help
@divicarpe18443 жыл бұрын
@@looinrims I would say it's because it would expose the responsibility and passiveness of UK and US.
@looinrims3 жыл бұрын
@@divicarpe1844 you…are ridiculous That isn’t the case whatsoever both historically and presently
@icrushchildrensdreams45565 жыл бұрын
“A great plan” *inflation lvl.100*
@Snowfox4565 жыл бұрын
Since the reparations were set in Reichsmark, however, the plan kinda worked...
@icrushchildrensdreams45565 жыл бұрын
Dominic Jackman it sorta worked but they also got free bricks to build their houses with in germany.
@personaronthegreat13995 жыл бұрын
I8pT do you mean Inflation OVER 9000
@unowno1234 жыл бұрын
lmao coming from the man who invented the great leap forward
@trdrudedude60994 жыл бұрын
No its Inflation Inflation Inflation LV 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
@hfar_in_the_sky5 жыл бұрын
"And while it can be said no-one won the Ruhr valley crisis..." A certain future Chaneclor: "Oh, I don't know about that..."
@schroederscurrentevents38443 жыл бұрын
@Shadow Reptile it’s very obviously Hitler and also France does not and has never had chancellors
@nishav1018223 жыл бұрын
I would say ending up in a ditch, covered in petrol, on fire, is not "winning"
@nishav1018223 жыл бұрын
@Shadow Reptile I was replying to the original post by hfar, apparently KZbin got mixed up
@damedley752 жыл бұрын
I need a sad react
@jonasb1045 жыл бұрын
Very interesting topic indeed. Here in Germany we learn about the Ruhr-occupation in school, but I didn't knew it was so bad for British-French relations. We focused more on the hyper-inflation oopsie by our government...😅
@alexg47115 жыл бұрын
well if you consider the threat of france occupying you printing money doesnt seem like that bad of an idea
@jonasb1045 жыл бұрын
@@alexg4711 Military staff be like: *we drown the french in paper!* And then paper would have to be forbiden by the Genfer-convention...😨
@laisphinto63722 ай бұрын
They downplay also massively how disgusting the french troops behaves during the occupation because you can only BE a """"Friend"""" with france If you lick their Boots and only praise them as angels
@derhenri20025 жыл бұрын
It should be mentioned that this inflation crisis heavily effected the view of the Weimar Republic for a lot of Germans back then. It left a deep shock in the populance and there are still stories of the suffering German people endured in many German families.
@mikehunt34362 жыл бұрын
It also devoured much of the population's life savings
@jimtaylor29422 күн бұрын
It's almost like the only winners were German Bankers (whom lied through their teeth to the allies & the German population), whom still profited while ordinary people starved.
@navaryn29383 жыл бұрын
Small note on the whole "printing money" thing: Economists at the time believed that a quick injection of liquid capital into the economy could stimulate small buisnesses, a positive effect which was projected to counter the (well predicted) inflation such move would cause. They ended up doing it because several experts (german and foreign) agreed that it could work. Then the government got kinda carried away and just kept printing even when it was clear that it wasn't working
@SamWinchester0002 жыл бұрын
Injection of capital to stimulate the economy when it does not work anymore. That sounds a bit like Keynsian.
@damedley752 жыл бұрын
Like a distant mirror
@Aceshot-uu7yx2 жыл бұрын
That is still used to this day but only once and as a last resort.
@damedley752 жыл бұрын
@@Aceshot-uu7yx incorrect
@damedley752 жыл бұрын
@@Aceshot-uu7yx Sorry I shouldn't have jumped to a conclusion... What is the "that" that is still used to this day?
@blackpowderuser3735 жыл бұрын
France: Let's severely punish Germany. What could go wrong? Germany: Let's print MORE money. What could go wrong?
@martinfiedler43174 жыл бұрын
@@historyfan So printing money causes World War? A very daring Hypothesis.
@zejdland4 жыл бұрын
Germany say should've been dismantled like the ottoman empire or the Austrian empire
@alexschmidt4434 жыл бұрын
@@martinfiedler4317 Makes sense to me. -Printing Money -Money has less value -The money on your bank, for which you saved your entire life, is nothing but worthless up to 1921 -Same probably goes to the company you worked for -Your company closes because it can't produce or buy due to it being broke -You're unemployed -You have luck and find a nine-to-five job -You realize saving money is Bullshit because the Money you earned on Friday is worthless on Monday -You buy everything you need literally right after work, literally carying your cash in a wheelbarrow -You're fired because the company you worked for closes due to it being broke -You realize life sucks -You know it's the frenchies fault -You hate the frenchies now because they destroyed your life -You realize that democracy in Germany succs D -Nazis say that Democracy succs D -''Yeah, that makes sense'' -You like the Nazis -Nazis take power -Nationalism is cool again -You want to be cool, so you become a Nationalist -You don't like Poland controlling Germany Territory -You rekk Poland - *Looking westward* -''You thought i forget about you?'' -You rekk France -''Oh boi, nobody can stop me now, not even...'' -You rekk Russia -Russia rekks you back - ''Ah shit. It's ok, we can do this'' - USA walks in - ''Did somebody say war?'' - USA rekks you - British rekk you - French farmers with guns rekk you - ''Oh come on no! Fuck you guys, seriously!'' Succ my dicc history!
@fluff54 жыл бұрын
@@alexschmidt443 Venezuela is going to start the ww3
@rodrigogomes51124 жыл бұрын
@@zejdland you miss the point that while austria and the ottomans were already very divided internally, german peoples wanted to be unified
@karmo16295 жыл бұрын
This channel is just so great for history fans like me. It touches on these footnotes and small things in the bigger picture. I love it. I even watch the videos about the historical eras i dont care about
@SamWinchester0002 жыл бұрын
Oh, you're absolutely right, e. g. I don't give a shit about the Middle Ages or Chinese history, but videos here are always interesting and intrigue me to put an eye on other topics and eras.
@roflmywaffles13135 жыл бұрын
This probably affected the French foreign policy and why they hesitated on helping the Polish and condemning German aggression in the late 30s
@samarkand15852 жыл бұрын
Well in-between a certain Great Depression happened too
@danieleyre8913 Жыл бұрын
And intervening when Hitler marched into the Ruhr in 1936.
@mrbisshieАй бұрын
In hindsight, allowing your military to gun down civilians wasn't exactly a good idea. It just made you look like a dick.
@superbird43515 жыл бұрын
*German Nationalism Intensifies
@gyaps_da_best58355 жыл бұрын
Frenchies in the trenchies
@gyaps_da_best58355 жыл бұрын
@FBI - Federal Bureau of Investigation Not an original sadly but it is still funny just wanted to tell the joke to people who haven't seen them :)
@toreq11275 жыл бұрын
UH OHHHH
@zejdland4 жыл бұрын
Whole europe: simply dismantles germany.
@zejdland3 жыл бұрын
@mitsuki XD
@miguelmontenegro35205 жыл бұрын
Germans: Literally any problem. Weimar Governament: *Prints Money*
@TheOMGJames5 жыл бұрын
Tbf under Gustav Stresemann the Weimar Republic did see a short economic boom by not printing more money amongst other things
@Jthomas-gg9pi5 жыл бұрын
BMT yeah it might’ve worked but America wanted the money back after the Wall Street crash so the money that was fixing the economy was gone
@mrbrainbob53205 жыл бұрын
@@Jthomas-gg9pi well America was mainly the only nation who gave Germany any real help.
@fristnamelastname55494 жыл бұрын
@@mrbrainbob5320 We Americans are the best.
@tano10044 жыл бұрын
*it’s free real estate*
@CliffCardi5 жыл бұрын
*sees Industrious Ruhr Valley in demilitarized Germany* France: “It’s free real estate.”
@Cjnw3 жыл бұрын
Normie
@Cjnw2 ай бұрын
@@Bd-ng1zv az anyád!!
@StevenKluber4 жыл бұрын
I mean, that 20% boost to production and +1 Production for each Mine and Quarry in this city is good reason for anyone to capture the Ruhr.
@Delosian3 жыл бұрын
Only if you replace all the workers with your own, otherwise you have to pay an assimilation penalty to production for the first ten turns.
@jcxz9832 жыл бұрын
@@Delosian So that's where France went wrong....
@omeven5785 Жыл бұрын
game ?
@marjanp11 ай бұрын
@@omeven5785Civilization 6
@ДмитрийОсипов-м9д19 күн бұрын
@@omeven5785 Sid Meier's Civilization VI, the Ruhr Valley is a very powerful world wonder you can build
@pyrotechnick4205 жыл бұрын
2:44 If you pause here you can see a visual representation of the entire history of French and British relations lol
@marcmacdonald19655 жыл бұрын
I think an important omission here (probably understandable due to extreme time constraint) is the main reason the French wanted reparations was to *pay the UK and US for their war debts*. At Versailles the French were actually in favour of forgiving all monetary transfers - debts & reparations - excluding a more modest amount for repairs to infrastructure etc. (perhaps understandable as they maybe were the largest debtor nation). The UK & US - France's creditors - disagreed. Hence the French pushed for reparations to cover the war debt. This is discussed in detail in the scholarship of Margaret MacMillan (Paris 1919). The traditional view of France as the motor for large reparations payments is... somewhat problematic. That was perhaps more the anglo-saxons. France's overriding priority was security.
@shatter3823 жыл бұрын
I think this in and of itself is a little misleading. The British rarely provided direct credit to the French, and were not a net creditor at the end of the war after spending over 50% more than the French on the war. At points the French, and Russian empires had far higher borrowing costs than the British, so it was agreed that France and Russia could borrow money from the British, at British borrowing rates. What this meant was if the French needed a million dollrars, the British would borrow it from the markets (at this time mostly Americans), then load it to the french at the same interest rate, with the idea that France would pay off the loan at a lower interest rate than she would otherwise be offered. The best way to look at this is the British guaranteed a significant amount of French debt, with a few extra steps. What this meant in practice is at points the Germans would pay the French, who would pay the British, who would then pay the final American creditor. Every loan the British gave the French had a matching loan the British needed to pay off at the same rate. In the end the British would never Profit from the French loans, the only thing they got out of it was a good credit rating.
@Okxyd3 жыл бұрын
What is not added either are the "emprunts russe", aka loans given to russian that the communists simply refused to pay back once after seizing power in 1917 (that would be 100 billions euros today). Combined with the fact that the most industrialized part of France was completely ravaged by the war and the heavy demographic price paid by France (half of a generation of young men). The narrative is that french wanted the money to punish the germans but the reality is that France had 200% of its GDP as debt after the war.
@looinrims2 жыл бұрын
“Hey thanks for all that cash fighting this war we couldn’t win without it, can we just not pay 90% of it?” Fuck you
@danieleyre8913 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely wrong. The France wanted reparations first and foremost to rebuild the regions of France that had been destroyed or pillaged during the war & German occupation. That’s why they were called reparations (go and translate the word). Paying back the USA and the UK (who had also borrowed to the hilt from the USA) was a more long-term thing that would be resulting from the repairs.
@Tathagatchat Жыл бұрын
Didn't he say that in the video? (the first line, not the whole explanation)
@icrushchildrensdreams45565 жыл бұрын
Why didn’t you include the Bottleneck Free State? It could’ve been very interesting
@alanz48195 жыл бұрын
I8pT Ankther channel already made a video on it
@icrushchildrensdreams45565 жыл бұрын
alanz ik but i wanted to hear how History Matters would explain it in his perspective
@50shekels5 жыл бұрын
@@seamonster936 Yeah. The same reason you guys implemented mandatory school shootings every second Tuesday. It's too boring without the constant threat of being gunned down
@syrialak1015 жыл бұрын
@@50shekels Butthurt much?
@50shekels5 жыл бұрын
Mallyoo oh don’t worry, I don’t really care what you think. Honestly the world is just sick of Murica propaganda, just because they weigh the most doesn’t mean they have a lot to say
@Hazgamer645 жыл бұрын
I'm really liking all the WW1-related Germany content. Please continue doing more of these, as these detailed edge cases should be shared more, along with the rest of the first world war's history. thanks a bunch!
@cv990a4 Жыл бұрын
Story time: sometime in the 1980s or 1990s I went with my mother to visit the widow of a much older colleague of my father. Her (American) military father had been stationed, along with his family, in a French occupation zone in Germany, as some kind of liaison. Being young and vivacious and in her late teens, she, of course, was much in demand as a dance partner at the military balls. Among the French officers with whom she danced was a tall gentleman of the name De Gaulle. I just looked at her - holy smokes, you danced with Charles De Gaulle?! Yep. Before he was all that, too. And yes, I checked - De Gaulle was indeed stationed in Germany, in Trier.
@dewittbourchier71693 жыл бұрын
One problem with this video: The French actually did get their payments. Belgian and French soldiers forced German workers to produce at gunpoint if necessary and if that did not work they were not above seizing machinery and infrastructure and shipping it back to France. So while they occupied it they did get everything they wanted. The only trouble was the international condemnation they received made it all ultimately not worth their while.
@carlbrenner7078 Жыл бұрын
So basically the French and the Belgians did what they had been doing to half of the world: they stole everything they could.
@danieleyre8913 Жыл бұрын
This is absolute fiction. The French never got even half of what they needed from the Germans.
@nicholasm7822 Жыл бұрын
As was their right. They should've taken the whole country and saved the whole continent a lot of trouble.
@MyDemon32 Жыл бұрын
@@nicholasm7822then you'd get a second Napoleon in Europe and the cycle will continue.
@julien333111 ай бұрын
@@MyDemon32 I prefer this than WWII
@princekalender21545 жыл бұрын
ZImbabwe: great plan, what could go wrong
@nikolay4101-s7r5 жыл бұрын
Last time I was this early there were living hussars Well, there was one, at least. He was a bit old though
@miguelmontenegro35205 жыл бұрын
RIP von Mackensen
@miguelmontenegro35205 жыл бұрын
RIP von Mackensen.
@seneca9835 жыл бұрын
@@miguelmontenegro3520: His first name was August, not RIP. ;)
@sebathadah15595 жыл бұрын
His name: *A U G U S T V O N M A C K E N S E N*
@AverytheCubanAmerican5 жыл бұрын
2:17 El Presidente...he would be great for Tropico
@corymoon24394 жыл бұрын
Driving in Orlando I saw a grocery store today called Presidente. Instantly busted out laughing thinking of the El Presidente brand in Tropico.
@bluesaberproductions89915 жыл бұрын
Cool Alt Hist idea: France refuses to back down, and continue to aggressively challenge the European order. Napoleonic Wars 2.0 begins!
@akiamini40063 жыл бұрын
I wish there were dozens of people like you that would do such courses on all types of data such as medical types its so damn EZ learnin
@looinrims2 жыл бұрын
Because it’s all surface level stuff that doesn’t even come close to even referencing all of the important points let alone any detail Ie there’s barely any data to disseminate
@housefireflygaming78935 жыл бұрын
I wish that these were longer keep up the great work
@ifazwolf5 жыл бұрын
Germany: *exists* France: They’re a threat to our peace! I suggest we I n v a d e
@alioshax77975 жыл бұрын
One this one, I would say we were right ;) I'm not 100% sure, but I think that Germany was kind of a threat for peace in 1933 ^^
@g3k0n885 жыл бұрын
@@alioshax7797 germany was always a threat to the peace
@g3k0n885 жыл бұрын
@@alioshax7797 and i mean was cuz now they are fine
@maxx10145 жыл бұрын
@TheSatanicTicTac so was France from 1871 onwards being salty about the loss of Alsace Lorraine. And basically French kingdom was a threat to peace since Hugo Carpet and later the empire with Napoleon lol
@rjabrogar34925 жыл бұрын
Germany: *uno reverse card*
@BMC25 жыл бұрын
Nice use of the Fes hat on that Maghreb French soldier :D
@karmo16295 жыл бұрын
02:16 *oh that surely wont backfire and be one of the reasons for a second world war*
@houjisaifeddine55245 жыл бұрын
france is really getting away with no repercussion for basically setting the stage for another ww
@nicolas.p3315 жыл бұрын
@@dillonblair6491 I mean the french did pay their war reparations in 1870-80 , Germany never did, for WW1 or WW2.
@greibert14475 жыл бұрын
@@nicolas.p331 Yeah, because those reparations in 1870-1880 weren't through the roof and motivated by resentment towards the French. Unlike in treaty of Versailles, French were salty that they had lost in the Franco-Prussian war and lost many soldiers in WW1. The thing is, Germany wasn't even able to pay it in the first place, so it's rather senseless to demand the money they didn't have. Now, Germany IS paying reparation for both the world wars...
@breissnbierisnix99525 жыл бұрын
Nicolas .P We still pay war reparations...
@thezeitos4695 жыл бұрын
@@nicolas.p331 thats because we are still paying them to this day, which should show you how insane the amount of money is.
@______6084 жыл бұрын
Me when I find a history matters video with no James Bissonette comments:😱
@martinmarvinofsparta36565 жыл бұрын
France after WWII: What did I tell you. Allies: Well you certainly didn’t help the situ- France after WWII: WHAT DID I TELL YOU!
@pride21845 жыл бұрын
It's the french fault for starting ww2. They pissed off a already bitter Germany who didn't lose the fight on the battlefield just lost at home.
@nickmtp88245 жыл бұрын
@@pride2184 That's the propaganda made by generals. In reality, German lost their last massive attacks and then French succedely counterattack. They severely lost the fight.
@Highway-Hobo5 жыл бұрын
France in 1939: Where my country gone?
@martinmarvinofsparta36565 жыл бұрын
France: Mistakes were made
@grandinquisitor83355 жыл бұрын
@@pride2184 kind of true France wanted revenge after the France Prussian war but all the treaty of Versailles did was put Germany in the same position France was extremely bitter
@ronh26605 жыл бұрын
Someone dies...they tip over Someone celebrates..they float through a field of daisies Meanwhile Serious voice!
@EyebrowsGaming3 жыл бұрын
Germany: We have the Ruhr France: We have an army Iron Man: We have a Hulk HistoryMatters: We have James Bisanette
@flashmustache77025 жыл бұрын
he should do a video on how Germany got out of hyper inflation
@aqui1ifer5 жыл бұрын
Vindictiveness & France, name a more iconic duo.
@ChallisVenstra5 жыл бұрын
aqui1ifer Taco Bell and Charmin?
@Grafvollundr5 жыл бұрын
France and attempts to occupy the coal rich Saarland
@skiteufr5 жыл бұрын
Germany and losing world wars Or Britain and oppressing tribes around the world...
@ZenBallMaster425 жыл бұрын
Please remind us which country started WW2 out of spite again ?
@nickmtp88245 жыл бұрын
Germany invaded twice neutral Belgium. Even France never dare to do so.
@Vienna30805 жыл бұрын
We need a video on Napolean the 3rd
@nb2008nc5 жыл бұрын
Napo lean? More like Napo Fat. That's what happens when you misspell Napoleon...
@Zhentarim4 ай бұрын
I think it was missing the point that France not only occupied the industrial center, it also occupied the mines, officially taking 70% of the production of iron, coal and "one more" (I don't remember but I think it was copper), this for 2.5 years. Yes, Germany created its own inflation, taking the currency from 1 to 4 with the dollar (or pound) in 1917 to 1 to 10 thousand in 1922, but with the French invasion it went to 1 trillion. Germany used inflation as an excuse, yes, but France was undoubtedly the agent of chaos in this situation in 1923. Only with the USA completely paying off Germany's debt through the Dawes Plan (later replaced by the Young Plan), and the establishment of an independent BC that stabilization was possible. In 1921, the payment of compensation exceeded 8% of GDP, it would already be difficult for a normal country, even more so for a country immersed in the post-war effects (of its complete responsibility, making it clear) and suffering attempted communist coups. a little late but I wanted to comment
@LaRozzle20 күн бұрын
“The foolhardy economic policy of having more money” Surprised more governments haven’t tried having more money
@Nexxarian5 жыл бұрын
Germany: *has massive amounts of inflation* Venezuela: hold my beer
@thesmm23115 жыл бұрын
Hungary:Amateurs!
@redcap-t4t4 жыл бұрын
Zimbabwe: *Allow me to introduce myself.*
@antoniodavi53924 жыл бұрын
Brazil: Excuse me
@reds.victim10234 жыл бұрын
Italy: Am I joke to you?
@sirsayde41904 жыл бұрын
Venezuela's inflation does not even reach the heels of the German.
@mitchellmdl72785 жыл бұрын
Just joined you're Patreon as a modern supporter. Looking forward to seeing more excellent content 👍
@itaybron5 жыл бұрын
1920's France: WE MUST ENFORCE THE TREATY OF VERSAILLES 1930's France: Germany's building up their military and not living up to the treaty? who gives a shit.
@xenotypos3 жыл бұрын
It was already too late. They (the others powers (just my way to say Britain)) should have reacted right from the start, in 1920. When it was possible. After that, wether France wanted it or not didn't change much: they just couldn't do it anymore.
@andreleclerc72313 жыл бұрын
Actually even as soon as the sudeten crisis France was ready to make it a war over it if Britain was willing to do its part. Czech and Poles were ready to go too.
@looinrims3 жыл бұрын
@@xenotypos what a stupid notion “let’s punish them for violating something they...haven’t violated yet”
@looinrims3 жыл бұрын
@@andreleclerc7231 considering how the poles ended their conflict there’s no way they’d be able to go on the offensive Also the Czechs had little popular support for this supposed offensive Ignore how the French were completely incapable of offensive operations And Britain had little in ground forces due to decreased budgets “Gah we should attack before they’re ready, why didn’t we think of that?” What a historical insight
@xenotypos3 жыл бұрын
@@looinrims No idea what the fuck you're even talking about. Maybe you're replying to a post from another dimension or something.
@maxmustermann41495 жыл бұрын
Regarding Versailles and lost territories: Some territories such as Upper Silesia and Memel were annexed by other countries, while the people in those territories voted to stay a part of Germany. The referendums that took place were a part of the Versailles treaty, not the instant annexation.
@adrianatgaming86405 жыл бұрын
it's a great strategy if you ever consider building an empire: take someone else's land, then deport the local people and replace them with your own. bam, now it's ethnic *insert ethnicity* territory. side effects including creating a hellhole for nationalist ranting.
@antanassmetona40545 жыл бұрын
Not sure about Upper Silesia, but Memel was always inhabited by Lithuanian Germans. When Memel was taken by Lithuania none of the people living there complained, or even tried to revolt.
@grandinquisitor83355 жыл бұрын
@@antanassmetona4054 didn't Lithuania get memel from France from a Crimean style uprising?
@antanassmetona40545 жыл бұрын
@@grandinquisitor8335 Memel was at that time being set up to become a city state, which Lithuania kept on refusing to happen. The whole region of Memel was inhabitated by Lithuanians, and it had a port which Lithuania wanted. Those two things were the major facts that caused the incident. Lithuania was not getting a chance to speak up in the world press, so it felt pressured to take matter into it's own hands - knowing that no one will listen to Lithuania's wishes. So to safely put it: no, France wanted to create a state of it's own, just like the free city of Danzig.
@grandinquisitor83355 жыл бұрын
@@antanassmetona4054 I meant to say stole it from France sorry
@alexbalan_56233 жыл бұрын
0:47 "Let's just print more money!" Me: Wait, no! This is a bad idea!
@FredericGaillot5 жыл бұрын
What's missing in this presentation is what happened in 1914-1918 in French and Belgium occupied territories. In 4 years, Germany occupied most of Belgium and about 10% of France. In these areas, Germany systematically organized forced labor for men/boy above 9 years old. Women, men, kids were forced to work for free in France, but many were also deported in Germany to support war effort. As an example, 10,000 people were deported in Holzminden camp in Germany alone. About 100,000 people were brought by force into Germany to support the German economy. As a reminder, German prisonners in France, UK, and later in US were not asked to work. Food allowances were restricted to 1,300 calories per person. They seized 75% of all crops and harvest available. In order to compensate this food restrictions, rations were granted by the US Embassy in Bruxelles and the red cross which were funded by US (386,000,000 USD), France (205,000,000 USD) and UK (109,000,000 USD), so that Allied powers were supporting the financial burden Germany would not carry. On top of this, each occupied city had to pay for a fee to support the German troops stationned within their area (about 184,000,000 French Francs). Germany had also set up a administrative service called Schutzverwaltung to seize all machines, plants and services that could be transferred in Germany. When Germany troops had to evacuate the areas they occupied in 1918 they simply damaged everything they could not take; mines were flooded, plants were destroyed. In 1923, French territory alone (excl. Belgium) accounted for 620 villages and cities totally destroyed (Reims for example had only 12 buildings left !), 1,334 destroyed above 50%, 2,349 partially destroyed, 293,043 buildings had been totally destroyed, 148,948 severely damaged. Alfred Sauvy, an well reputated economist estimated that the cost of the war for France was 34,000,000,000 French Francs. German troops also executed without trials civilians, and in several occasions massacres were pertpetrated. After the war Germany refused to hand over the officers who gave the orders for such acts. It is estimated that 30,000 civilians had been killed in labor camps, fortress or in random military actions in occupied France, and 8,000 were simplied shot dead. Finally, France and Germany went at war in 1870-1871, and France lost. France repaid every single gold coin it had to pay to Germany, and German troops left France only in 1873 when the last coin was received. Germany benefited from special economical benefits over the trade on the Rhine river until .. 1914. So, France respected the first Versailles treaty dated 1871 in which the country was humiliated and punished. French troops in Ruhr sounds like a bad idea when looking back in 2019, but the decisions and actions taken in 1923 cannot be disconnected from what happened just right before, and considering that Germany did not suffer the war in its own territory, and that Germany imposed strict decisions over France in 1870-1871 until 1914.
@nicolasaudra87094 жыл бұрын
Excellent ! Très bien dit et résumé.
@louisg62964 жыл бұрын
Merci putain Ce qu'on peut voir dans les coms... y a même des mecs qui nous rendent responsables de la seconde guerre mondiale...
@zap32314 жыл бұрын
You're forgetting that the French didn't care. Like the video says.
@FredericGaillot4 жыл бұрын
@@zap3231 French always cared about Germany not to be too strong. German cared as well. They were shocked by the presence of black troops in the Ruhr area. During 1940 French campaign, German troops bluntly executed black soldiers like in Clamecy, Angivillers, Erquinvillers or Cressonsacq simply to take revenge over this 1923 occupation.
@zap32314 жыл бұрын
@@FredericGaillot Explain, then, why in the Treaty of Versailles was France against war reparations (except for a really modest infrastructure repaid fee)
@sebebse90943 жыл бұрын
3:04 **exists** History Matters enthusiasts: Impossible
@rusael3335 жыл бұрын
correction: France and Belgium (and the UK and the rest of the Entente) did not want reparations for the horrors of war they had endured. Basically, since the war waged for longer than people had expected and the destruction and human loss was way beyond what was known, the enemy (mainly Germany) started being demonized in the eyes of the masses, and the reason of the war slowly turned from "we're gonna defend ourselves" to "germans will have to pay for what they've done to us". Politicians of the time probably realized that asking Germany for reparations was useless since they couldn't possibly pay what they were asking, but they couldn't go against the expectations of the masses since they needed their votes after all.
@rusael3335 жыл бұрын
this combined with the fact that France and the UK didn't know how to keep Germany under control (and the fact that the UK didn't really want to get involved in mainland affairs) meant that reparations was the best solution they could come up with at the time, since the Versailles conference went less than optimal to say the least (way too many issues that needed to be resolved since a lot of small states with regional issues were present, and not enough time since the people on the victorious side were eager to get their reparations)
@fj16595 жыл бұрын
Just imagine WWI was mainly happening on American soil, lets say between the USA on one side and Mexico & the Commonwealth on the other. After some years of War the USA lost and the Winner take the land witch wars captured by the USA in the War against Spain. But the Winner want more - maybe because he have to take more. And the Canadian Army occupy the region around Detroit and kill several US civilians threre. Did you think the US People would say "oh, its ok we lost the War and have no rights to complain anyways"? with an economic crysis and a agressive neigborhood the US People would be easy to catch by some right-wing movements too.. thats for Sure..
@nestpascamillekazeyquiveut99845 жыл бұрын
The thing is that WW1 didn't happen on German soil but on Belgian and French soil. That is why France and Belgium were more rude against Germany compared to the US and GB who's countries had not been threatened and who didn't forced conscription.
@fj16595 жыл бұрын
@@nestpascamillekazeyquiveut9984 i think you know that the reason for all this Chaos and all the human pain wars not Germanys Offensive against France and Belgium. France want this "revengewar" more than any other Nation for the lost War from 1870-71. Of cause the Invasion in Belgium wars wrong. The German highcommand Made this Plans more than 10 years earlyer. And even in this Time the Plan wars obsolete
@11Survivor4 жыл бұрын
@@fj1659 WW1 happened on French and Belgian soil. The ardennes: French and Belgian soil. Lorraine: French soil. Alsace: The only part of the 2nd Reich that saw active combat but was then retaken by the French after the war so technically French soil. I could go on, and on, and on with how most of the battles were on French soil on the western front.
@fj16594 жыл бұрын
@@11Survivor it wars just an Exemple. I just want to say that every Country in the World would be an easy Catch for extreme political movements if the economic, social and political situation is the same like the situaion in Germany in the interwar years. The Anti-German politics of France, GB, and the USA wars the foundation for the rise of the Nazis in Germany.
@axelpatrickb.pingol32284 жыл бұрын
It's called the "Southern Victory" series by Harry Turtledove...
@karensmanager63404 жыл бұрын
"mommm, i want millionaire" "we already have millionaire at home sweetie" millionaire at home:
@romare87633 жыл бұрын
@@Cjnw this response seems normal so now the tables will now turn towards your area and you will now be titled "normie"
@NoahWeaverRacing5 жыл бұрын
France: *Where’s our MONEH* Weimar Republic: *I got a plan, this is a Good one*
@urmumgae42454 жыл бұрын
But first have some god damn faith
@JenniferinIllinois5 жыл бұрын
I laugh every time I see one of your square fellas bounding through the field of daisies. 🤣🤣🤣
@bobbyferg91735 жыл бұрын
1:12 France: Germany isn’t making their payments so let’s put economic sanctions on them! Britain: But wouldn’t that reduce their ability to make further payments to you? France: ...
@salviniusaugustus55415 жыл бұрын
Germany had the ability to pay. They didn't want to. That's what dumb British thinking they are so smart, still don't understand.
@bobbyferg91735 жыл бұрын
Salvinius Augustus I would like to point out that there is a difference between having money and being able to pay off a debt. Just as someone who is paying off a car loan wouldn’t give all of their money at once to pay the loan, as they wouldn’t have very much money for necessities like food or even gas, Germany wouldn’t give their entire treasury at once to pay off their debt, since they have to take care of their own country first. Considering that Germany was recovering from the massive loss that WW1 brought, I wouldn’t say they were in the best shape to be paying other countries. You also have to consider that from the perspective of the people in Germany that the Government giving so much money to a foreign power, who were previously at war nonetheless, looks like they are easily submitting. Basically diverting so much resources to pay of France’s (quite unfair) fine would only lead to the German people suffering more.
@1000eau5 жыл бұрын
France : I NEED TO PUNCH GERMANY !
@freewal4 жыл бұрын
In 1923 the German industry had excellent results when the French and the Belgian ones were destroyed by the German invasion. German factories were not destroyed by the war. All the German infrastructure was ok. Germany had the money. They just didn’t want to pay and repair.
@bobbyferg91734 жыл бұрын
Amazigh Blue Azul - Anti Mafia - Anti ANPD France: No you can’t have your own intact factories, it is unfair! Germany: Ha ha production lines go Vrrrrrrrrrr
@thejoojoo99995 жыл бұрын
I love your videos, which are funny and informative and overall great ! I think this short format is nice, but it would also be cool if we could still get 10min videos from time to time. Keep up the good work !
@mankytoes5 жыл бұрын
Bit disappointed that you went with the "Germany so dumb they printed lots of money" cliche. They knew hyperinflation was a risk, but were desperate. Printing money can actually be benefitial if you get quantities right. We call it "quantative easing" these days.
@luuchoo935 жыл бұрын
mankytoes Germany did suffer a lot from hyperinflation . No country in history has ever benefited from that insane level of inflation
@brandonlyon7305 жыл бұрын
If you literally have to have a wheelbarrow full of money out just to buy grocery’s you might need to rethink of printing out endless money.
@mankytoes5 жыл бұрын
@@brandonlyon730 Yes, and by that point obviously they knew that. The intention was to inflat the currency, but it ran out of control. Saying they decided to have hyperinflation is like saying we decided to have a recession.
@alanpennie80135 жыл бұрын
@Garviel Loken Revolutions and hyper inflation tend to go together. Revolutionary governments lack legitimacy and find it hard to collect taxes.
@seneca9835 жыл бұрын
@@mankytoes: It's clear they did way too much "QE". And I don't think comparing it to QE done by contemporary central banks is fair. Today QE is done when inflation (in addition to nominal interest rates) is too low and needs to be increased to boost aggregate demand. In the Weimar Republic, they printed more money to raise money through seigniorage with no regard for too high inflation which is just bonkers.
@AlekWheeler3 жыл бұрын
I mean, this plan of simply adding more money never failed me in Roller Coaster Tycoon…who knew it wouldn’t work for France?
@hydro07594 жыл бұрын
The Interwar Period, also known as Debt Simulator.
@BirdTurdMemes4 жыл бұрын
Hydro 07 Or debt collecter simulator if you’re American
@SirWilliamKidney3 жыл бұрын
I love the von Mackinsen hat in the beginning!
@orpheonkatakrosmortarchoft43324 жыл бұрын
Allies to France after WW1: Dividing Germany is a bad idea. Allies after WW2: Let's divide Germany ?
@samarkand15852 жыл бұрын
Russia was not the 'Allies' in WW2
@ixlnxs2 жыл бұрын
@@samarkand1585 😎 Correct. The Soviet Union was the biggest of the Allies. 🤩 EDIT: 1941-1945 that is
@llamaboxx2 жыл бұрын
@@samarkand1585 if I remember correctly they had their own faction called the Cominterm right?
@eleacy62312 жыл бұрын
@@llamaboxx Yes, but they were also in the Allies with the United Kingdom and the United States
@squarek123 Жыл бұрын
@@ixlnxs September 17 1939 moment
@erraticonteuse5 жыл бұрын
France: If we don't extract every centime the Germans owe us, who knows what other parts of the treaty they'll violate?? France: **exacerbates a German economic crisis and kills a few Germans** Germans: **suddenly a lot more willing to violate the rest of the treaty**
@mrbrainbob53205 жыл бұрын
@TheSatanicTicTac well it was a war that's what your are supposed to do
@HelmHammerhand17095 жыл бұрын
CommandoDude yes but the occupation was the reason why so many Germans would hate the french untilgbar 1957
@nickmtp88245 жыл бұрын
Germans killed much more civilians when they invaded North East part of France in 1914.
@salt_factory75665 жыл бұрын
So let's see. If you try to enforce the treaty, Germany violates it. But if you give the Germany lee way, they violate it, annex countries, and start ww2. If only there was a solution, oh yes, dismantle the German state into east and west with permanent occupation zones.
@freewal4 жыл бұрын
Alter Fritz1709 The occupation was fair and legal. Germany destroyed one fifth of France and 80% of Belgium whereas its own infrastructures suffered nothing. All the coal French industry was destroyed for instance. War reparations were normal. Germany agreed to pay and then refuse. So occupation was normal. Personally i think that a lot of Germans denied the defeat and its leaded to nazis. Civilians never saw any combat in their country whereas Thousands of cities and villages were destroyed in France.
@Fourbix4 жыл бұрын
France: we should strike while we can. Britain: Na it's fine there will be no drawbacks at all.
@ViriatoII3 жыл бұрын
That's funny because French love strikes ;p
@saguntum-iberian-greekkons70145 жыл бұрын
2:03 in the background there is a "El Presidente"
@somert1703 жыл бұрын
1:02 Subtitles : Due to the horrors they had to *enjoy* during the first world war
@justhere4637 Жыл бұрын
It's kind of the same. Subtitles: "because of the horrors they had to enjoy during the First World War" (17 Nov, 2023).
@adamraserovaquera3 жыл бұрын
0:13 Fun fact: germany seems like a dragon head
@5nafFNAFSquirrelsquirrel2 ай бұрын
Omg why have I never realized that before
@jonasaleksandras60335 жыл бұрын
Do a video about the Lithuanian revolts against communist occupation in 1941 June and the Partisan uprising beetwen 1944-1953.
@jonasaleksandras60335 жыл бұрын
@An unimpressed Rooster I do. It would make an interesting video for people who watch, if you dont like it thats your problem
@ecoper2105 жыл бұрын
I do too, it's always interesting to hear and learn about new stuff!
@jonasaleksandras60335 жыл бұрын
@@ecoper210 Well I am Lithuanian and these uprisings are barely known outside my country.
@brandonlyon7305 жыл бұрын
Honestly it be an interesting video if they talked about the Soviet Union occupy and quickly annexing the Baltic states and all of the politics that went on in them.
@OddCompass5 жыл бұрын
Big yikes -- France went from occupying the Ruhr to accepting reparations reforms (put forth by Britain and the US) just like that? Talk about a rollercoaster ride.
@kylemohs87285 жыл бұрын
It's only gonna get crazier from here. XD
@alanpennie80135 жыл бұрын
All their old allies sided with the Germans. Their only remaining friends were the Belgians.
@Joe1up2 жыл бұрын
Can you do a video on how Germany was able to build up such a large military after WW1?
@144digital11 ай бұрын
Don't know if you're willing to watch long form videos but TimeGhost history has some information about this
@liamburgess8044 жыл бұрын
Your videos teach me more about history then 12 years of school did
@robertjarczak57102 жыл бұрын
he makes the home front and 1920s in europe way better then any class i've been to
@VinceOliver045 жыл бұрын
Imagine trying to weaken an enemy into permanent submission but it instead came back stronger...
@brandonlyon7305 жыл бұрын
It was probably a better idea to have just split Germany up in a dozen smaller states, as they did to Austria-Hungary and the Ottomans.
@areulsois84115 жыл бұрын
@@brandonlyon730 but the people are still german, they cant be seperated by nationalism.
@mopmop95524 жыл бұрын
@Stephen Jenkins At the time they wanted. The Austrian Republic was named "German Austria" by it´s people and wanted to join Germany. But the allies forbade it in the Versailles Treaty (another case of that fucked up idea of "national self-determination", or at least the implementation of it).
@gobanito3 жыл бұрын
Moral of the story is, non violent resistance pays off.
@gimmethegepgun5 жыл бұрын
I think it's pretty reasonable to say that EVERYONE lost the Ruhr crisis. Except the MIC.
@gusbussolano037 ай бұрын
3:01 I like he kinda sounds pissed
@shemarjacobs61955 жыл бұрын
Can we get an episode about Poland during WWII? Like the resistance or the Polish armies in the East and West?
@mlszkw5 жыл бұрын
There basically was almost no resistance xd
@trlacr17815 жыл бұрын
@@mlszkw There was.
@trlacr17815 жыл бұрын
@Fabian Kirchgessner I mean during occupation, like in France, Yugoslavia...
@abdulmasaiev90245 жыл бұрын
@@mlszkw There was literally the biggest, most organised resistance movement of the whole war, spanning to an entire underground state robust enough that it ran actual underground universities. And while the regular Polish armies were defeated on the home soil (you try fighting the Nazi Germany and the USSR on two fronts at the same time), many were reformed elsewhere (like for example in Iran) and kept on fighting, while politically there never was a formal declaration of surrender. So no, there was plenty of resistance and plenty to do a video on.
@HogRidda2 жыл бұрын
almost 1 million views keep up the good work
@lillelille52564 жыл бұрын
I live in Dortmund cole, beer, and currywurst is our thing Ruhrgebiet 🥰
@saillok49235 жыл бұрын
Could you please do an episode about the Corfu crisis in 1923?
@Sweet_Pup_g5 жыл бұрын
The last time I was this early, the French was a competent empire.
@christiangaming-fy6rv5 жыл бұрын
So u were never early?
@abigweed18115 жыл бұрын
@@christiangaming-fy6rv oof
@efthymiosanagnostos74275 жыл бұрын
Projekt:Kobra the Greeks held out in ww2 for 6-7 months delaying Germans and getting the first allied victory. France barely could hold for a month with British help lol
@syrialak1015 жыл бұрын
@Projekt:Kobra Get your head out of your ass.
@frankgonzalezdelvalle81805 жыл бұрын
@Projekt:Kobra ok french boomer
@phosphoros604 жыл бұрын
Britain, in particular, was very critical of the French. Well, colour me surprised...
@TransformersBoss Жыл бұрын
USA: “hey guys, let’s take it easy on Germany’s war payments.” Also USA: [punches France in the face] “where’s my money? Huh? Where’s my money? You better have it by tomorrow morning!”
@oliversherman24142 жыл бұрын
I love your channel keep up the great stuff!!!!
@SiVlog19895 жыл бұрын
I think that the French were just out for a pound of flesh with the Ruhr crisis. It was just another step in the road that culminated in a second world war. Another sign that the Treaty of Versailles was a flawed peace treaty, far from stabilising Europe after a terrible war, it only sowed the seeds of yet more instability, yet more tension, yet more nationalistic feelings
@HerralemanZyG4 жыл бұрын
"Print more money, what could go wrong" - Argentina aproves this plan
@N11Productions5 жыл бұрын
I have relatives who were killed by french soldiers during the occupation.
@lsq78335 жыл бұрын
Good riddance
@N11Productions5 жыл бұрын
excuse me? Are you kidding? You are a horrible person to suggest that the death of innocents is warranted for ANY reason
@m.m69905 жыл бұрын
@@N11Productions its ok he must be like 10 years old ha
@N11Productions5 жыл бұрын
@@m.m6990 He's probably some 10 year old french nationalist.
@nestpascamillekazeyquiveut99845 жыл бұрын
@@Wiktor33 Hmm which Germany? France is by far the greatest western european army.
@krabistheisopod13765 жыл бұрын
Nobody Germany: *T I M E*
@Cjnw5 жыл бұрын
*N O R M I E*
@jameslawrie38073 жыл бұрын
People, usually English speakers I'm afraid, often have almost no idea just how badly France and Belgium suffered in The Great War. To start with it was fought primarily in those countries' industrial and resource zones and they were demolished in the process. Secondly, think for a minute the horrific casualties the British Empire took in The Somme Offensive. Now consider that in terms of casualties such as that of the battles of Verdun historians consider the British to have gotten off lightly. Finally, the reparations are actually comparable to those inflicted on France after the Franco-Prussian War. Now, I'm not arguing that Versailles was right or fair but it's not exactly what most people think.
@genericchannelname41103 жыл бұрын
I agree with your points, but punishing Germany to the point where it was in chaos just wasn’t a good way of repairing damage, though.
@ixlnxs2 жыл бұрын
@@genericchannelname4110 😎 I think James Lawrie's point is that Germany and the UK had been looking for a reason to fight a war against each other for decades and ended up fighting in neither of the two, but instead destroyed much of France and most of Belgium. 🤩
@todo12312 жыл бұрын
Did belgium pay congo? No. Did france pay for their colonies? No. Why should germany pay
@sasoriae5225 Жыл бұрын
@@todo1231 Did Uk or Germany pay for it too ? No… Why you speak about the colonies ? This has nothing to do with the point James is making That much than no colonized people fight in Franco-Prussian war
@tronus85862 жыл бұрын
History Matters: This upset the French and the Belgians who wanted their money because of the horrors that they had to endure in WWI. Subtitles: …the horrors they had to enjoy in WWI.
@Rieee1402 жыл бұрын
3:32 huh its james bisonnete
@wayneparker93315 жыл бұрын
I continue use to enjoy your videos immensely.
@beluwuga25734 жыл бұрын
France: we wanna avoid the repeat of the great war Also france: hiipity hoppity all your shit is my property.
@tictac2therevenge2913 жыл бұрын
French industry was wrecked by the fighting while German was left intact, and France owed lots of money to the US and UK Someone has to pay
@looinrims3 жыл бұрын
@@tictac2therevenge291 the innocents of France and Germany, obviously And they got sweet nothing from their occupation, oh accept to set the stage to lose THEIR ENTIRE COLONIAL EMPIRE Woooo, that’s quite the profit
@tictac2therevenge2913 жыл бұрын
@@looinrims What would you have suggested?
@looinrims3 жыл бұрын
@@tictac2therevenge291 suggested for what?
@tictac2therevenge2913 жыл бұрын
@@looinrims For the problem I just presented, how should France have dealt with the need for money that was caused its neighbor? Should they print it all? Wait for it to fall out of the sky?
@miwi98832 жыл бұрын
Printing money while production is shut is the perfect receipt for hyper inflation.
@peepoo97203 жыл бұрын
2:55 STOP *PRNTING* MONEY!
@sebathadah15595 жыл бұрын
I had no idea this even happened. THANK YOU!
@icrushchildrensdreams45565 жыл бұрын
0:34 napoleon be watching....
@warriorkid5 жыл бұрын
You got me straight away with "Can we stop?"
@Altazor-fh9of3 жыл бұрын
Until 3:09 I thought the French were just being paranoid bullies but then I remembered oh yeah, "that", "maybe they deserved to stay there".