Thank you for the correction. I will pin the comment
@MorningNapalm11 ай бұрын
The description also says 100mm :) Did you own the Hasselblad H 100mm by any chance? @@JacquesGaines
@borromine Жыл бұрын
I have been photographing since the late 1940s. First camera was 127 Ansco. Used every thing from Rollei 6x6 Pentax 67, Canons, Nikons etc. This lens is truly one of a kind. I did not realize what a great photographer I was still I started to use it. 😂😂😂 seriously, it’s great. I tried the GF 80mm f1.7. Nice but the 110 is just some how better. Very heavy. But when you look at the images its weight seems to fall away.
@JacquesGaines Жыл бұрын
I totally agree
@RichardSilvius4 жыл бұрын
Great review! Speaking of portrait lenses, I would love to see what the Pentax 67 105 f2.4 looks like on GFX - with a focal reducer.
@timpriestley8997Ай бұрын
So I have the 80mm 1.7, I've watched heaps of reviews for eachother, I dont think i need both, donypu think the 110mm f2 is better than the 80mm 1.7 Im definitely keen on one, but tossing up whether o really need both ....
@dan-le-brun2 жыл бұрын
I never put the lens hood on it, never had a problem even in bright daylight. Some seriously good coatings on it.
@JacquesGaines Жыл бұрын
Ahh
@JohnCross-rz5uq2 ай бұрын
That 110mm Lens can be used for many other kind of photography than just portrait ! I would fx use it for Landscape, Nature, Architecture, Street and more !
@JacquesGaines2 ай бұрын
It is a focal length that is very useful.
@borromine4 жыл бұрын
For people wondering if they should go for this, I want to echo this review. I have this lens and it surprises you. It is so so stunning. All of a sudden you realize what a great photographer you are. Jokes aside, it produces wonderful images and makes you want to do more portraits work. And yes, you feel like you are actually there when the images come up on screen. And for those people that simply do not want to spend this much, there is a solution that is not as good but still not so bad: the Canon 85mm f1.8; yes, it vignettes but you can just shoot square format at f1.8 while using a smart adapter. Very light very cheap. Still if you shout portraits or fashion, you’ll never look back once you have the 110.
@JacquesGaines4 жыл бұрын
I totally agree. The equivalent in the X mount is the 90mm. Stunning and amazing lenses.
@dannyli94242 ай бұрын
I actually feel opposite coming from Nikon 85 1.2S and 135 Plena.
@mauricerijnders35079 ай бұрын
Nice review👍🏼 I cannot remember though that is said “portrait lens” on the box. It is a great lens for creatives how want to use that focal length (and aperture) to make any subject magical. Landscape, street, portret, … ☺️
@JacquesGaines9 ай бұрын
Totally agree. It's just that that focal length tends toward portrait photos.
@mauricerijnders35079 ай бұрын
Yes, when you're a portrait photographer this is a no brainer. For other stuff this is a creativity machine 😃😅👍🏼
@RagingBubuli4 жыл бұрын
7:32 That buttery smooth bokeh!
@JacquesGaines4 жыл бұрын
Like buttaaa!!
@ryans_life4 жыл бұрын
Lovely review as always jack and gorgeous lens from Fuji. One day I hope to get a used R and get into the system
@JacquesGaines4 жыл бұрын
Thank you Ryan. One little question though. Do you find yourself in a workflow, on any of what you do, where snappiness and agility are a concern? If so, you might want to re think your strategy. If not, it is a beautifully capable and striking way to get into either corporate, portrait or fine art photography. Cheers and thank you for the support.
@ryans_life4 жыл бұрын
@@JacquesGaines Excellent post mate. Indeed. I have heard that medium format poses many unique challenges from a performance perspective which is why I don't mind waiting to see how the landscape will change In the next few years. Cheers for your great content and engagement.
@beronbeorn29843 ай бұрын
@@JacquesGaines would you recommend him for marriage or not? the gfx 100 system
@bikerdash27 Жыл бұрын
Fab Video ! Thank You.
@JacquesGaines Жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@Anarki2U3 жыл бұрын
How do the 110mm perform for landcape photography if you are going to make large prints ? I do not agree with you about the lens hood, I have Hasselblad with "plastic" lens hood which do a very good job and being light weight a the same time very strong and solid, metal hoods are heavy and if a metal hood gets a big beating of fx a drop it might not function any more, so I have a very good experience with strong "plastic" lens hood´s :)
@NoahStephens3 жыл бұрын
Agreed. Plastic doesn’t necessarily mean cheap
@algordon67964 жыл бұрын
I purchase the 50R with the 50 mm lens and can't decide to go with the primes or the 45-100 with ibis which will cover most usable focal lengths, of course expense is a factor...
@JacquesGaines4 жыл бұрын
The GF line are all excellent lenses. However, I am a fixed focal length maniac. To me, the added image quality is too significant to ignore. IMHO get the 110mm
@tianxing77954 жыл бұрын
After get the new firmware update (4.0), the autofocus will improve. Great review! Hope to see more!
@JacquesGaines4 жыл бұрын
Also Fuji just announced updates for the GFX cameras also. I believe this will also help.
@karimnasser92262 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video Jacques. This is a great lens and I've seen large prints from it, simply amazing. Your video however was recorded in 1080P, essentially 2MP, so it doesn't surprise me that the images in the video don't begin to give the lens justice. I have a GFX 50S II with a 50mm F/3.5, do you recommend me getting the 110 for portrait, or do you think the 50mm is enough? I shoot portraits in a city environment and I often don't have the space to move far from my subject. Thanks!
@JacquesGaines2 жыл бұрын
Yes the 1080 sort of puts a damper on the whole thing. That 110 is crazy crazy crazy sharp. If you are looking to make large prints, dont think twice. The 110 is a beast!
@JacquesGaines2 жыл бұрын
However it is a .80 crop so it is like having an 85mm full frame. You have to be far from the subject. I wouls suggest the 80mm f/1.7
@Mattytube183 жыл бұрын
Everyone always goes on the the generic. I’m a landscape photographer and this is my favorite focal length for that genre. All is subject. I shoot portraits with a 200mm 35mm.
@JacquesGaines3 жыл бұрын
Thank you. I love to hear about different approaches. 110 for landscape. Who would've thought.
@Canaaninc3 жыл бұрын
How is this GF100mm compared to the new Fuji GF80mm lense? Can you also use Fuji 2X converter for both?
@larryroccostudio3 жыл бұрын
Now that the GF80mm 1.7 is here, would you prefer it over the 110mm? Is the a test link to that? Thank you! You are the most professional I’ve viewed. Please review the 100s.
@JacquesGaines3 жыл бұрын
Gee thanks. I have not had the oportunity to test the GF80. However, remember that when a new model comes out, the older model goes down in price. So the coming of the 80mm might be good but might also be an oportunity to get the 110 at a lower price. Cheers
@tomislavmiletic_4 жыл бұрын
I'm drooling right now 😜
@JacquesGaines4 жыл бұрын
If ever you get the chance Thomas message me via my website. I have a few reflections and comments about the GFX system.
@JuanLopez-oz9kh4 жыл бұрын
Beautiful, would love to see you try some FF lenses on the GFX. I am a manual shooter, so auto-focus not a big deal and peeking has changed everything for me.
@JacquesGaines4 жыл бұрын
Hey Juan. Unfortunately, I find myself neglecting my APS-c collection and my XT3 and XT30 bodies these days and giving a great deal of time to lens testing. Question for you though: Have you been using the GFX system with FF lenses via an adaptor these days?
@JuanLopez-oz9kh4 жыл бұрын
@@JacquesGaines have not, looking at a used one for $2300 to use with my nikon ff lenses, gfx lenses are very expensive, now.
@JacquesGaines4 жыл бұрын
Agreed. 2300 sounds like a good price
@andrepoon3 жыл бұрын
Ohhhh… I was going to buy a Leica Q2… and now I’ve gone down this rabbit hole!
@JacquesGaines3 жыл бұрын
Trust me. It's a nice hole. 😋
@dakotaxu47923 жыл бұрын
Yes there is another lens that can replace and maybe even exceed it, but on a different camera system because it’s not a Fuji lens and it’s not for the GFX system. It’s the Sigma 135mm Art lens.
@JacquesGaines3 жыл бұрын
True. It is an excellent lens. But we need to compare apples with oranges no?
@cleverghostcinema4 жыл бұрын
Wonder how the 50mm f1 xf would compare
@JacquesGaines4 жыл бұрын
Hmm interesting proposal
@xof1123 жыл бұрын
@@JacquesGaines ... exactly what i was looking for, when i got to your video - especially separation from the background, smoothness of the bokeh ... is this worth the extra money if i own a Fuji-X Camera for Portraits?
@00_Ryan_004 жыл бұрын
Nice Vid Jacques. I dont shoot people, only landscapes, but I'm curious of your opinion....Fuji 200 F/2 or the 110 in this vid? Which is the better portrait lens? I know...completely different formats, but still, if space constraints of the 200 are not an issue which would you want as the only one to use?
@JacquesGaines4 жыл бұрын
Well maybe not the same formats but if you just look at focal range, the 110 (an 85mm ff equivalent) vs 200mm (300mm) ff equivalent because it is mounted on APS-C) is just going to be better. I tested the 200 and my God was I ever always way too far away from the subject to get something decent. My two cents
@jimmyhill95914 жыл бұрын
I have to agree with Jacques on this one. Almost all I do is portraits(corporate headshots/online dating shoots). The 110 or 120 would serve better for 𝙢𝙤𝙨𝙩 portrait needs. Of course there are times the longer focal length comes in handy such as photographing performers where you can't get close, weddings where you want to capture the emotions of a bride without interfering in the moment or just portraits where you want to really compress the background for artistic/composition purposes. For typical portraits though, between 85 and 135(in 35mm terms) is great. The XF90(135 equivalent) is my main lens for corporate headshots because it gives enough breathing room between myself and my 'non-model' clients(realtors/lawyers/etc) without being so long that I can't use it in a typical office. Half/three quarter shots are done with my XF56(85 equivalent). A 200, particularly on a crop sensor(300mm equivalent), would not only put me too far from my clients to communicate well with them, it would add no real value to the shot just because of some extra 'perspective compression'. It would more likely take away from the shot. For those online dating shoots I actually tend to use my X100F with the TCL most. A 50mm equivalent focal length, despite so many saying it is unflattering because they read so on a forum, makes the images more personal/intimate and also adds some context/a story which works perfect for the purpose of those images. What focal length you use should be based on the purpose of the photo. No matter how you slice it, a long telephoto is going to produce an image that looks like it was taken from far away. Fine for paparazzi or sports/action photographers...Not always(rarely) ideal for anyone else. Medium telephotos(in that 85-135 range) serve a different role and the 50 or even 35 another. Any of them can be used for 'portraits'. Portrait has many meanings and focal length is a tool not an answer.
@nelsonclub77224 жыл бұрын
I am the same - with a GFX100 - I didn't like the 110, I didn't like the 250 - however I love the 120 Macro
@filibertkraxner3054 жыл бұрын
@@jimmyhill9591 You make some very good points. I too find that a 50mm (35mm eq.) lens gives a more intimate feel to portraits, which is what I probably even prefer over an 85/90 (35mm eq.) lens. I think the key is the perspective you get from simply being closer to your subject. The typical 50mm distance corresponding to the distance for an intimate conversation. Anyway, that's what I feel. I'm very much looking forward to the GF80mm/1.7 that's announced, but today I'm checking out the 110. I think they might even complement eachother nicely (if the 80 focuses close enough).
@dannyli94242 ай бұрын
Close down to F32, and you like the image quality ?
@JacquesGaines2 ай бұрын
Did I say that?
@johnnygilroy5213 Жыл бұрын
Can I do Macro photos with this lens?
@JacquesGaines Жыл бұрын
I do not believe that it has Macro capabilities. You might want to check out the Fuji site. Their specs tab on the product page is excellent
@lawrencelam18204 жыл бұрын
Hi Jacques, just an amateur player as I am, I start to try the GFX system. I'm now putting my Canon 85L II on GFX 50R and the result is stunning with an exception of the focusing speed of course. I just wonder if GF110/2 can rise the image quality to another horizon, any view please?
@JacquesGaines4 жыл бұрын
I believe so. As I am aware that the 85 is a great lens, always remember that native GF lenses have to resolve to at least 100mpixels
@jlove244 жыл бұрын
Would you say this is the best gfx 100 portrait lens??
@JacquesGaines4 жыл бұрын
Yes. By far.
@jlove244 жыл бұрын
@@JacquesGaines thank you!
@muehlemannfilms4 жыл бұрын
on the shot in the park bridge says 16bit... is there a secret to get 16bit out of the 50S? thought it was 14...?!?
@JacquesGaines4 жыл бұрын
If there is, I am unaware. I simply took tghe photos. But suffice to say that I shoot exclusively in RAW. The RAW factor might be the difference
@MichaelLaing714 жыл бұрын
Nikon 85mm f/1.8 Bokah king? Its a good lens for the price but I wouldn't put it up their as one of the great bokah lenses for Nikon.
@JacquesGaines4 жыл бұрын
Oh yes? Which Nikon lens would it be?
@MichaelLaing714 жыл бұрын
@@JacquesGaines Well the Nikkor 85mm f/1.4D and G are both better, then either the 1.8D and G, when it comes to bokah, Also the Nikkor 105mm f/1.4e is better. Looking outside of Nikon I prefer the Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 Planar T, Milvus and Otus, as well as the Tamron 85mm f/1.8 VC and I haven't even mentioned the Sigma. So, whilst I think both the Nikkor 85mm f/1.8 D and G are good lenses (and some where in the house I probably have a 85mm f/1.8D (though I may have lent it out)), I do think they fall a bit behind in the bokah department (the G is very sharp though).
@MichaelLaing714 жыл бұрын
@@JacquesGaines I just thought it odd that the video calls the Nikkor 85mm f/1.8 asking of bokah. The only lens I can think of that I haven't tried is the new Nikkor 85mm f/1.8s?
@ricksatterwhite57903 жыл бұрын
Best Nikon lens for OUTSTANDING bokeh is of course the 200mm f2
@Rob06087011 ай бұрын
How about the canon 85mm f1.2L using an EF- GF adapter?
@JeffDietzphoto3 жыл бұрын
I was this years old when I learned that somehow you can't shoot a 110mm lens outside without the lens hood? huh?
@joejojo59664 жыл бұрын
THIS IS The sharpest most beautiful lens ive ever used. But i cant afford it lol
@JacquesGaines4 жыл бұрын
I feel ya. Neither can I. Fuji let me use it for 3 weeks.
@dannyli94242 ай бұрын
It's funny people always try to use good words to describe its AF system , as good as it can be.... it's pretty good ... ...LOL. i call it not just frustrating but painful experience with the AF on GFX 50S II + 110 when compare to my Z9 + 85 1.2s and A1 with a 3rd party Sigma 85 1.4 dg dn.
@JacquesGaines2 ай бұрын
Point taken. The GFX line in general is very clunky to say the least
@EugeneMaynard4 жыл бұрын
🙏🏾
@ricksatterwhite57903 жыл бұрын
Need to include raw files
@JacquesGaines3 жыл бұрын
Hmm I have been thinking of having adownload link. Is that something you think might be useful? If so, please tell me why,