Actually, I think this show is a RESPONSE to Sarte. Remember Chidi's book is "What We Owe Each Other." Which is about social obligation being the key to good behavior and improvement. It's by dealing with other people that the group escapes the bad place to become "better." It's directly contradicting the conclusions of Sarte. It's saying his hell won't work because other people are also how we are inspired to grow and become better people.
@multilevelintelligence6 жыл бұрын
good point.
@spencerkoelle1846 жыл бұрын
Also backed up by Eleanor's backstory, where we see that what really set her down her dark path of evil and misery was a deliberate withdraw from the people around her and any mutual ties to them.
@seth51436 жыл бұрын
Haven't seen the Good Place, but I noticed while reading your comment how perfectly well what you're saying lines up with the themes of Schur's other series.
@tusharg84526 жыл бұрын
This is spot on.
@rubenzavala20846 жыл бұрын
A +
@reaunamaughon5 жыл бұрын
My question is how the hell did chidi choose a major in the first place and how long did it take him?
@aleandrian4 жыл бұрын
Just finished it... same question here.. But he kinda choose the major OF choices itself...
@PranayVaidya4 жыл бұрын
Cause if you are lit enough to think like a philosopher, you know that other majors don't really matter. So, there was no choice.
@finding_aether4 жыл бұрын
Chidi is actually 45 years old. He took 13 years to pick his major
@fatuousinnovatorofsadness46404 жыл бұрын
They answered that in the flashback in the second to last episode. Chidi gave a lecture to his parents, (professor) about the overall reasons they should stay together, and he used a philosophy book to base his argument. It was pretty clear to me that this had the double effect of destroying his ability to make choices, but also giving him a passion - to find the toughest shit to answer in life, which is moral philosophy. His girlfriend argues theoretical physics at one point, but those do have answers that we haven't yet found. Moral philosophy allows for exploration of the values of daily life, which is where his origins of both a shitty choice maker and a professor came into being. He chose his major because it was a core part of his personality, as much as being indecisive was.
@francomuscellini17444 жыл бұрын
Like, 3 Beramys
@novelmartinez61546 жыл бұрын
"Dear frozen yogurt, you are the celery of desserts. Be ice cream or be nothing." - Ron Swanson
@AxelQC6 жыл бұрын
But celery adds a lot of flavor to food. The mirepoix is the base of most soups, stews and many sauces. It's diced onions, carrots, and celery that is sauteed to release its flavor, and then the rest of the ingredients are added.
@RickReasonnz6 жыл бұрын
Yoghurt>Ice cream
@lizx90126 жыл бұрын
Karth38 what the fuck is wrong with you
@void-xt8pw5 жыл бұрын
I'm sorry but frozen yogurt is better then icecream.
@dumbsquaredgirl57095 жыл бұрын
The
@hbaldinr4 жыл бұрын
I cried a lot on the finale, seeing they passing through the portal was so touching
@Wolfsbane9092 жыл бұрын
can we reboot this series because its generating way more buzz now then it did in the before times. the networks might want to replace chidi with an white power puff guy. >.
@user-yz4jg7xl7u10 ай бұрын
@@Wolfsbane909what.?
@tagcoriolis102916 күн бұрын
Yeah Chidi choosing to end his existence rather than spending eternity with Eleanor proving that he is the selfish one is really touching if not ineptly written by Hollywood elites who claim the moral high ground while supporting genocide in Palestine.
@capt.anxiety95026 жыл бұрын
best line of the good place Eleanor: clam chowder is just hot ocean milk with dead animal croutons
@bazzfromthebackground36966 жыл бұрын
Ew, no seasonings? lol
@ofirstroh6 жыл бұрын
Counterargument: I'm gonna grab some Camus!
@InYourWallsAndSink6 жыл бұрын
Yes
@291577th6 жыл бұрын
HOT DIGGITY DOG
@hectorarredondo69296 жыл бұрын
Best part was when jason of all people figured out that they are in the bsd place and Michael feels offended that his simulation didn't work
@mahmodeissa91726 жыл бұрын
Finally a show that puts the trolly dilemma in action
@bazzfromthebackground36966 жыл бұрын
The correct answer is to grind on both sets of tracks. -insert heavy euro beat-
@peterDcontact6 жыл бұрын
Mind field, the youtube red series has a "real life" application of this theory
@mahmodeissa91726 жыл бұрын
@@peterDcontact thanks a lot
@DaSquareful6 жыл бұрын
Idk what I was expecting Mr. indecision to do, I mean, its pretty obvious in hindsight.
@jsveterans69496 жыл бұрын
Kirk it! I don't believe in no win scenario's...
@mirashakti3806 жыл бұрын
I think something you didn't mention but that the show demonstrates is that you don't need friends who are better than you that you emulate, you need people you genuinely CARE about. Genuinely caring is more likely to make you act ethically than anything else, especially since the show points out that if you do good for the sake of being good it doesn't really count. For the most part, none of the characters had that before the Good/Bad Place, and developed the relations with each other there. Somewhere in their consciousness, those connections still exist even with memory loss, something in them has been changed by knowing that there is something worth being good for. A small example of this is that even back when Eleanor was alive she took her niece to the mall for a snack, because she cared. Caring is important. Micheal didn't predict that the people who torture us most are the people we are most likely to be able to form real relationships with, and thus grow with. Caring IS torture. Also, he grows to care for them as he gets to know them intimately, and is basically their god for years.
@danielarossi54376 жыл бұрын
I love this. Just a question, was it being good for the sake of being good or being good for the rewards of being good? or both of those, and both are just as bad?
@mirashakti3806 жыл бұрын
@@danielarossi5437 I think maybe being good for the rewards is worse, but I'm not sure the show makes a distinction. Either way, neither is really authentic, which is why they don't count. For example, look at Chidi, he was always trying to be good for the sake of being good, and that attitude hurt him mostly because all his decisions, or non-decisions, were convoluted and hurt people. Like when he missed his mom's surgery because he didn't think it was right to break promises, even though he had only promised to help someone figure out how to use their phone, and they definitely would have understood and could have rescheduled. But he was so caught up in "being good" that he was actually bad. Probably a lot of times in his life if he'd just been more selfish he would have been better, ironically. Another example could be really out there, like you volunteer to do something just to be good, but your heart really isn't in it, you could accidentally taken a spot away from someone who was truly passionate, so in the greater scheme of things your efforts are never going to be as much of a benefit to the project as that person's would have been, so you inadvertently actually did something bad. Of course, if they're under-staffed, all hands are welcome, but it's just a possibility. Everything is very complicated. I won't be surprised if in the end the show reveals there is no real good and bad place, and it's all some bigger scheme than that, because the whole idea of being able to label people intrinsically good or bad without taking into account everything that went into forming them and their decision processes is silly. Really, all four of them died without anyone to really look forward to being great companions with, aka soul mates, in heaven, so maybe the show is a giant match-making device lols. Not only match you up with a soul mate, but help teach you to actually have a successful relationship and meaningful existence. Just a thought. (Sorry my answer is long-winded, this is one of my favorite shows and topics ever.)
@danielarossi54376 жыл бұрын
No, I really appreciate the long answer! It's so unusual to have a nice chat in the comments section. The four of them are so interesting characters, the part of the heart not being there is what sent Tahani to the bad place, and the lack of empathy and caring sent Chidi there. Jason maybe the controversial one? because he's basically a walking hydrangea (you know: pretty, decorative, useless, and potentially toxic if ingested); so being an absolute dumbass that can't fully grip the difference between good and bad is enough to send somebody to the bad place?
@mirashakti3806 жыл бұрын
@@danielarossi5437 I agree, it is very unusual to have a nice chat in comments, usually my comments all get ignored lols! This is awesome. A walking hydrangea, that's hilarious =) If we are to believe the show's premise, he's there simply on a point based system. However, to me he's one of the best examples of potentially it being more of a learning opportunity. Plus he and Tahani are kinda perfect for each other. He's simple enough to basically worship her, while also kinda bringing her down a few notches to reality. I think they can really help each other grow, she's over-educated and he's under-educated, but when it comes to having a good time he's more educated then she is! And he wants to be a DJ, and she loves to throw parties, it's great. Also, his childlike way of seeing everything is a great foil for all the character's, because it kind of tests their goodness by giving them opportunities to react. Sometimes I think maybe the show is also a metaphor for the fact that if you're living a "bad" life, you are already in a bad place. I mean, for example, Jason's stupidity repeatedly landed him in bad and painful scenarios, such as suffocating in a safe. So he doesn't need to become that much smarter really, he just needs to have better friends who've got his back and will help him keep from "shooting himself in the foot." The natural reward for this is that they get to enjoy his spontaneous excitement about reality, and his great knowledge of hot-wings and music. Thus, being "truly good" is a natural reward, not in big mansions or magical rewards like the "good place," but in meaningful moments that genuinely feel good to have experienced with the people you were with. No matter how nice a life you have, it can still turn to dust in your mouth if you don't spend it with the right people, which is evidenced by Tahani. She had everything anyone could reasonably wish for, but since she had no concept of true love or friendship she tried to fill that hole by competing with her sister, falsely believing that somehow being more and more "successful" would bring her fulfillment. She always name dropped, or number dropped, or achievement dropped, but she never had any really poignant memories of a moment spent with another person that was just special. I mean, maybe there are portions of hell filled with butt spiders that are reserved for the truly evil (if they can't be deleted, I sometimes find it hard to imagine the universe wasting space on the truly irredeemable, but since I'm not God and can't see the entirety of anyone's existence who knows what they can do with people's souls), but I think since this show focuses on four fairly benign characters I can safely suppose that they aren't truly destined for the "bad place" and potentially never were. They just didn't have anyone to hang out with, and had a lot of growing left to do in order to be able to have happy existences.
@oof-rr5nf6 жыл бұрын
Awesome comment, OP!
@basedbattledroid35076 жыл бұрын
The Philosophy of The Good Place is that Blake Bortles is Dope.
@oswaldosaenz20836 жыл бұрын
Vegetarian Soylent-Green Jake Jortles XD
@maysings18754 жыл бұрын
Jason--is that you?
@sass200014 жыл бұрын
FOOOOOLLLLLLLEEEESSSSS
@netclips4k4 жыл бұрын
Go Jags!!!
@ParanormalEncyclopedia3 жыл бұрын
It's also "throw a molotov cocktail"
@nachoviking6 жыл бұрын
Haven’t seen this show? Ya Basic!
@coyfish46106 жыл бұрын
Ive just listened to the Good Place podcast and D'arcy Carden says that she went with one of the writers to a Beyoncé concert and this guy kept criticizing Beyoncé all the time, till they confronted him and he turned to them and said: Ya basic! That's how that line ended up in the show. So funny.
@Momo-bu3le6 жыл бұрын
Adrian Perez Ya basic!
@joseluissantillanbravo776 жыл бұрын
That's devastating, i'm devastated now.
@aesannie29526 жыл бұрын
I’ve seen it does that mean I’m cool cool cool cool cool
@Dyieg06 жыл бұрын
No adrian, ya basic
@Maria-fz8km6 жыл бұрын
The idea of Chidis philosophy lessons still sticking with Eleanor despite the memory wipes seems to parallel the way that Janet is constantly evolving with every reboot and still having emotions for Jason despite not remembering any of it
@SgtAntsy98196 жыл бұрын
On a meta-ethical note, all that learning about philosophy did for me was drastically increase my existential despair. Seriously, each system of philosophy I learnt about only increased my conviction that no system of beliefs or understanding of existence is ultimately reliable and we are doomed to ambiguity, unable to grasp a tangible meaning on any level. Even better, there's a philosophy describing that very thing; it's called Phyrricism (if I'm remembering correctly) and it's core tenet is "Nothing can be known, not even this." so I'm denied even the brief joy of having had an original thought.
@McSenkel6 жыл бұрын
And?
@SgtAntsy98196 жыл бұрын
What I can't just wax lyrical about my existential dread on a youtube video?? Unless that was extremely dry humour in which case bravo
@cisalzlman6 жыл бұрын
Chidi is that you
@laumay73646 жыл бұрын
"Despair, doomed, denied even the brief joy,". Why does "is" make you unhappy. Philosophically, you have made a choice to interpret everything as "bad." As Peter Griffin would say, "Stop it, just stop it!"
@kitthornton23366 жыл бұрын
"...doomed to ambiguity..." There's the problem. Ambiguity isn't necessarily a source of despair. To be human is to live in ambiguity like a fish lives in water. It has limits, but within it, you are free. Life has the meaning you give it. There is no giver of meaning out there that you must conform to. Ambiguity is just another way of saying "Liberty."
@samrecio23136 жыл бұрын
This is literally on my top ten favorite shows ever
@mifhadi6 жыл бұрын
HypeR BF Hey could you list the other 9 shows? Thanks
@TuanNguyen-ko9wz6 жыл бұрын
I expect at least another Michael Schur-run show, The Office or Nine-Nine, on your list.
@quranmccoy56725 жыл бұрын
Same
@alyssalelis10845 жыл бұрын
@@TuanNguyen-ko9wz Well it's on my list lol
@eperke29335 жыл бұрын
i noticed that anyone who ever watched the good place says that its a masterpiece/ its one of the best shows ever. Its a shame that many people don't even know it.
@taojingwu63305 жыл бұрын
can we also talk about how Janet is one of the funniest characters ever written?
@saloni.sharma4 жыл бұрын
and how amazingly D'arcy handled the character!
@spiderscurry56143 жыл бұрын
true
@satan_from_hell2 жыл бұрын
“not a girl :)”
@Wolfsbane9092 жыл бұрын
yeah but the bad place people will just simply rip it off like an common peasant pilgerist, so they deserve to be in the bad place. u seen bad janet, its pretty much non functioning
@Wolfsbane9092 жыл бұрын
I can relate to Jason because he has an dance group called dance dance resolution.
@jordangreggs5886 жыл бұрын
Not a girl, not a robot I’m Janet
@D.M.S.6 жыл бұрын
Actually you are Jordan.
@MrJuanjo7956 жыл бұрын
Hi I'm elfo
@BARALover966 жыл бұрын
I'm Aigis
@UsenameTakenWasTaken6 жыл бұрын
I am Spartacus!
@danielarossi54376 жыл бұрын
Not just a Janet anymore :)
@stephg08832 жыл бұрын
I feel like there are more lessons in this show that are hidden. That living on earth is torture but your perspective and your actions are what turns it into "the good place". Also that you may take different paths in your life but it will always end up at the same destination. That you won't cherish anything in your life unless it has an end date. And there are so many more lessons. Such a well written show
@TofuTeo2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this comment :-)
@intellectually_lazy Жыл бұрын
what kinda fucked up place turns away refugees? there's one
@MidniteMagus6 жыл бұрын
I feel like especially in season 2 there's also a conversation to be had about whether or not it's fair to judge a person's actions without taking their environment into context. Eleanor learns to be good in the Good/Bad place because all of her external problems have been taken care of (food, shelter, etc) and she has the time to focus on learning to be a better person. The last episode of season 2 shows us that in real life she struggles and falters a few times because the trials and pressures of life make her journey of self-improvement incredibly difficult. I also think the fact that Michael's character goes from being a demon to a crusader against the system is another add-on to this argument. A demon who simply lives to torture people might never question his/her role, but a demon who learns to know those people as human and gets to know them personally might suddenly have a change of heart. The fact that he calls out the system as unfair is (I think) the show's big philosophical reveal this season and might be the best commentary it has made on religion and ethics so far.
@ScarletDeath6 жыл бұрын
I took an Ethics in Journalism class. Studied a bunch of stuff....and then at the very end the professor was like, "ultimately, you have to decide what you're going to do." What I gained from that, is that ethics can be flexible. Like having to know the rules in order to break them properly. Understanding the consequences, as well.
@VanNessy974 жыл бұрын
Pick your battles
@Aras4834 жыл бұрын
Great explanation and perspective on this topic, well done.
@sophiejones77276 жыл бұрын
"there's something so human about taking something great and ruining it a little so you can have more of it"-omigawd now I need to watch this so bad. Is this on Netflix?
@kriz11dc4 жыл бұрын
yes
@intellectually_lazy Жыл бұрын
and i thought my metaphor for capitalism was apt
@smol_chilli_pepper6 жыл бұрын
I love this show a lot. It's clever, funny and thought-provoking with actually good comedy. Not to mention hella unique. If you haven't seen it yet I highly recommend it
@DanteYewToob5 жыл бұрын
The way I saw it, they got better and improved because they were so different. They each had flaws, and strengths that helped eachother grow. Chidi had the smarts, but was too indecisive to put them to use, while Eleanor was direct and quick at making decisions and could go with the flow. Tahani was obsessed with self image, while Jason didn't care what anyone thinks. There are many examples like these of how the group fits together and improves eachother based on the strengths and flaws of each of them. Sure there was no single good person for then to learn from as an example, but combined they all make for one great person! They didn't need a single good person to learn from. I think, had they all been similar and had similar flaws, it never would have worked and they wouldn't have improved.
@LEFT4BASS4 жыл бұрын
When I learned about ethical theories in school I realized that you can justify nearly any action with at least one moral theory. Utilitarianism alone could be used to justify a ton of terrible things.
@romanski58113 жыл бұрын
Only poor understandings of utilitarianism could be used to justify a ton of terrible things.
@jjescorpiso212 жыл бұрын
@@romanski5811 Poor understanding doesn't deter people from doing bad things 🤷🏻♀️
@romanski58112 жыл бұрын
@@jjescorpiso21 Yeah, but that's exactly _my_ point.
@RaquelSantos-hj1mq2 жыл бұрын
And it was!
@invincibleimage37136 жыл бұрын
i literarally just finished binge watching this 5 mins ago
@multilevelintelligence6 жыл бұрын
2
@DouglasBelt6 жыл бұрын
Never thought Jason belonged in the bad place, he seemed so innocent and stupid but genuinely cared about folks.
@cjboyo6 жыл бұрын
Okay, but the points system only counts positive actions taken with no exterior motives, and Jason did a ton of bad shit no matter where his heart was.
@El_Rey_2476 жыл бұрын
Clara Kolterman, The points system could be entirely made up since we don't know exactly how the real good place works. We do know that intention matters, though, since Tahani's positive actions weren't counted because she was doing it for the wrong reasons.
@nellnee726 жыл бұрын
When someone is just so ... simple? ... is it wrong to condemn them to the bad place?
@timbeaton50456 жыл бұрын
Doug Belt...as Clara points out "... but the points system only counts positive actions taken with no exterior motives.." which is in itself a meta critique of Utilitarianism. So essentially the determination of of destination i..e. Good Place or Bad Place is only contingent on the outcome of your actions. However, this is undercut when Eleanor only gains points on that stopwatch thingy, when she realises that her motives ARE being taken into account. This is a bit of "Having your frozen yoghurt and eating it"
@soumyaranjankanr3065 жыл бұрын
@@cjboyo Yeah, obliviously and without thinking of consequences
@yusefendure3 жыл бұрын
The impact of the show was enormous. Unlike the cold, mechanical approach of learning ethics in a classroom or from reading books, The Good Place hooks you with emotional bonding. Every character was on the hero's journey. That's why it's easy to love the characters. Watching people fall then rise again stronger can motivate people to change for the better.
@Ben-rz9cf6 жыл бұрын
So heres my theory. Throughout the show based on their time on earth, we only ever have examples of what disqualifies someone to get into the good place, but never examples of what must be done to qualify. And we are also given competing moral philosophies, which we can most certainly RULE OUT as the "right" philosophy based on what we've seen. On one hand, if pure utilitarianism were the "right" way, then Tahani would be in the good place based on the sheer volume of good her philanthropy had done for humanity, which would outweigh her impure intentions in doing so. On the other hand, we see Chidi constantly in a quandry about competing moral philosophies, but the only one we ever see him follow to a T is the Kantian method, so much so that it actually tore him up inside the select 1 or 2 times he violated the Kantian philosophy in his entire life (or afterlife, for that matter). In fact, the inner turmoil that causes so much pain for him and the people around him is the sheer incompatibility of the Kantian approach which he follows, and the competing moral philosophies he is in consideration of. So we can rule Kant out. (also, Michael confirmed Kant is in the bad place, although he might have been forking with him.) The one time in the show we see a moral philosophy that actually might work is when we see Elenor announce her self identification as a moral particularist, which convinces Chidi to abandon his purely Kantian approach, and save his friends in the process. In fact, it is her ability to balance these philosophies, that unites the gang and pushes them towards their best selves. She's also the one that best sees the absurdity of creating an entire reality to torture and punish people who weren't amazingly benevolent in real life--however, no one has of yet, pointed out the sheer hypocrisy of using a supposedly "objective and absolute" moral standard to STRAIGHT UP TORTURE PEOPLE as if torture itself is somehow more ethical when done by higher dimensional beings. The way i see it, if there is a hell, its an insane load of bullshit because how the fuck is torturing people any more morally superior than anything they could have done to deserve torture? And how is MORE power something that entitles you to be the torturer, rather than having a greater responsibility not to abuse that power like any other human evaluation of ethical standards? Why the fuck shouldn't we hold god to the same OR HIGHER moral standard as we hold ourselves?
@twinscythezone50435 жыл бұрын
Word. You should come to the Good place discord and we can talk philosophy XD
@af-ptheace10855 жыл бұрын
Damn I just watched the show cause Kristen Bell is hot
@UOweMe5 жыл бұрын
They started to get into that at the end of last season, going to the accounting department and disputing how the point system works. I think we'll see more in the season to come!
@twinscythezone50435 жыл бұрын
@@UOweMe I'm quite excited to see how it all wraps up
@Cristian-sn5ow2 жыл бұрын
I hope the ending of the show was enjoyable for you i had similar questions wondering how could the system be so hypocritical. I loved the ending and how they gave everyone the benefit of the doubt allowing them to retest over and over until everyone finally belonged in the good place. If there is an afterlife/creator of some sort I really hope this is the most accurate depiction of it.
@ajavisk6 жыл бұрын
I love that show. Extremely funny, relatable characters and actually makes me think
@batgurrl5 жыл бұрын
Ajavisk totally agreed. It’s a real gem
@FilmFightFanatic6 жыл бұрын
Asking whether learning about ethics makes you a more ethical person seems like a very loaded question. What is "ethical" even supposed to be in this case? Following any moral philosophy and sticking with it regardless of how valid it is? I wonder what the definition of "moral" actually was in the study cited in the video. What formed the basis of what is considered "ethical behavior" in it? Because the study may just reveal the moral biases of the philosopher more than it does the ethical nature of the participants' actions.
@Ansatz666 жыл бұрын
"What is 'ethical' even supposed to be in this case?" That question is the very concept of metaethics. It's not about how to be a good person, but rather it's about trying to decide what it would even mean to be a good person. There is a wide variety of answers and people will probably be arguing about it for as long as at least two people exist. "Following any moral philosophy and sticking with it regardless of how valid it is?" That's probably not what they were going for in the study. It's hard to believe anyone would take a metaethical theory like that seriously. "I wonder what the definition of moral actually was in the study cited in the video." All the important metaethical theories have much in common. Any theory that said it was good to steal or murder would be fairly rejected by almost everyone. You don't necessarily need to pick a favorite theory in order to determine whether people are behaving morally. The more difficult question is how they measured which people were behaving morally. People aren't usually open and honest about their immoral decisions.
@FilmFightFanatic6 жыл бұрын
But they can't measure how people behave ethically when the very concept of ethics is the unanswered question itself. You can teach someone any ethical theory but you can't say whether they act ethically because we haven't even established what "ethical" is in the first place. Let's say we teach someone utilitarianism and how to apply that to the trolley problem by sacrificing one person to save the larger group on the other track. Sacrificing one for the many is "ethical" in the utilitarian sense but also not in the deontological sense. Deontology (like the categorical imperative) might be the next ethical theory they learn. So if that same person were to go out and behave in whatever way, any of their actions could be justified by any ethical theory. So you can't really say whether they behaved more ethically or not after learning ethics because it hasn't been decided what constitutes an "ethical" action. Therefore if the philosopher conducting the survey were to say people didn't act more ethically after learning ethics it would either assume that one ethical theory is more "ethical" than the other, or that the the person was only taught one ethical theory and their actions were only considered "ethical" if they only acted according to that specific ethical theory. Either way the study is biased. Once again, I'm not talking about metaethics as a whole. I'm talking about the study that was cited and how its design may have some problems (only because the video didn't clarify).
@josen956 жыл бұрын
@Jamyang Pelsang YES. THANK YOU!!!
@AspLode6 жыл бұрын
Well this problem was actually confronted in the bad-place-museum-opening scene (S2E10), where Eleanor pokes holes in Chidi's adherence to Kant's strict prohibition of dishonesty by bringing up Johnathan Dancy's Moral Particularism which is the vehicle by which Chidi temporarily escapes the Kantian prison to which he sentenced himself to, and had been the foil to every convenient choice he had turned down up until then. It suggests that what is ethical is a fluid concept that takes into account the happiness and preferences of others, even demons, and by consequence the integrity of their joint plan to get through the bad place to reach the Judge.
@jaytay2234 жыл бұрын
I think it's important to remember that Eleanor became a good person when she went back to Earth because she survived a near death experience. That's how all of them were. It was basically the point of sending them back.
@midoribushi53313 жыл бұрын
I binge watched this show recently and fell in love. Great ending. Great cast /w amazing chemistry, excellent writing, directing, etc. Fork yeah!
@iloveyoufor10000years3 жыл бұрын
I'm in a philosophy class because of this show and i'm slowly learning that i actually really love philosophy
@rashelhernandez53963 жыл бұрын
This show changed the way I see the after life and I am constantly self conscious about my good actions and whether I’m doing it for the sake of being good or for my future like I had a full on break down after watching this show about if I’m actually a good person or not
@DodgeWatt6 жыл бұрын
Thank you wisecrack, i never heard of this till your video, binge watched the first two seasons and now season three has started. Thank you for showing me this existed!
@DodgeWatt6 жыл бұрын
Just an FYI i binged before watching this(watched about 1min) and your video is on point.
@JWilkinsonYIF6 жыл бұрын
I’m so glad you examined The Good Place! Awesome viddy!
@thetruthbetweenthelines85216 жыл бұрын
This was so much fun! Excellent work!
@johnsnow92106 жыл бұрын
Agreed, she killed it.
@GogiRegion5 жыл бұрын
One of my favorite parts of the show, is that they not only have the brief philosophy lessons in the show, but the rest of the show actually subtly covers those same lessons (or in episodes without lessons, other philosophy concepts), increasing your knowledge on the concepts.
@sheepybreaker6 жыл бұрын
THIS IS THE WISECRACK I BEEN WAITING FOR!
@griffinroberts65186 жыл бұрын
I was going to request this on patreon, thank god y’all read my mind. This is why I love wisecrack!
@vampireknight10036 жыл бұрын
and i was just re-visiting another video essay on The Good Place when the notification bell rang! wisecrack is the best.
@ojiverdeconfleco6 жыл бұрын
Loved this video! And still you didn't expand on the "why act well? Because we owe it to each other", which I think is the actual moral stance the show takes. It is because of our relationships (in the broad sense but also in the particular) that we owe each other acts of goodness and love. And yes, this could also be a very Catholic read on moral dilemas, but there you have it.
@Personal_Chizo6 жыл бұрын
You *REALLY* couldn't figure out whether the almost-robot that learns to love has a philosophical/moral relevance to the the show? ...REALLY?!
@Beatness1216 жыл бұрын
explain
@danielarossi54376 жыл бұрын
Yeah, explain. Also, not an almost robot.
@gato82256 жыл бұрын
and then created another of her own but inferior for reasons she cannot understand
@kaztros25956 жыл бұрын
Not Hermes Bouza, but there's a lot of good writing going on with the almost-robot: Janet is an embodiment of The Objective Lens, through which any quantitative question can be answered. But she's limited (as is that lens) to which questions she can answer. The show asks us, while considering meta-ethics, about which questions can't be answered objectively. E.g. "Why do I find this beautiful?" is a question Janet shouldn't be able to ask: she shouldn't carry a bias. And it's a question that people struggle with in rational objective terms. If what's beautiful to us cannot be explained in rational objectivism, then how we pursue beauty may not be visible through The Objective Lens. The Good Place is asking us to consider the limitations of quantitative analysis for the characters: Janet's memory is reset, and her memories with Jason are removed. Yet she's irrationally sad when Jason is set to marry Tahani. Michael and Janet can objectively correlate her glitches to that relationship, but there's no rational reason for this to happen -- unless only quantitative memories removed every wipe. Janet, with subjective memories and tastes, is now more human-like. And Janet's process is the same as the humans: Eleanor isn't behaving differently because she, pre-wipe, could recite Kierkegaard and Kant. It's because she learned to love Chidi, and what he loves.
@619Gotenks6 жыл бұрын
You could also not be a dick and just say it and be helpful instead of essentially not saying anything at all.
@Gavgoyle6 жыл бұрын
Great forking coverage of a great forking show!! The Trolley Dilemma episode had me in stitches when I first saw it. Excellent job, Helen, you knocked that shirt out of the park!
@batgurrl5 жыл бұрын
The best network comedy on TV currently. Clever and deep and silly. Thanks so much for this video
@kentmiller77426 жыл бұрын
I've been watching your videos for quite some time, and this one was utterly exceptional! I have two requests: 1. Wish Jared some love! - I'm so so glad he's taking some time for himself (Force knows he needs it) and this also allows us to see more of the Wisecrack team presenting videos (all the while living up to Jared's legendary standard!) 2. Philosophy of Crazy Ex-girlfriend! - it's probably my favorite show right now, and it explores some great themes of mental health, tolerance, and romance narratives. Thank you all for everything you do! Peace! ✌✌✌
@gyrozeppeli89406 жыл бұрын
Just finished two seasons of this show in the last two days and now this. Ayyyo.
@sussanroads420394 ай бұрын
You've really nailed it with this video.
@andromedasmoons36475 жыл бұрын
The reason Eleanor behaves more ethically and begins trying to become a good person at the end of S2 is because Michael alters the moment of her death and the near-death experience makes her reevaluate her life. She had absolutely no memories of dying and being in the "Good Place" because it happened in a different time line, so those experiences couldn't have altered her moral intuitions because they didn't happen to her. This also explains why she still behaved how she did in the grocery store and treated the environmental activist the same exact way. The change began after her near death experience.
@Pillbughug57426 жыл бұрын
Helen, I’m so glad that you’re on the channel. Thanks for carrying us through the episode!
@ultraatari92986 жыл бұрын
An interesting meta action would be for a hardcore fan to compile the good point score data like I saw using Facebook as a verb is -5 and staying loyal to the Cleveland browns +50 and see what a person would be like if they did everything either defined as good or bad by this list.
@jsveterans69496 жыл бұрын
Like China? Or the Orville?
@affanshaikh8492 Жыл бұрын
I know I'm late to the "trolley" but this was such a good show! I had difficulty finishing the last episode because I had that empty feeling inside me of "what I'm gonna do after this is over?" So I kept delaying the episode but while watching it I realised Eleanor was feeling the same... The sense of being alone was scary but as Michael said... "Not knowing what's gonna happen next is the beauty of being human"
@allnaturalfigjam3103 жыл бұрын
The Good Place is one of only three shows I've ever watched where after every scene I've said "Oh wow, [different main character] is my absolute favourite!!" because they're all so well-written and interesting. The other two shows are Brooklyn Nine-Nine and Bojack Horseman ^_^
@Ryangubbs4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for showing us where the idea for the show came from and nicely sum up the characters and the parts they play. Great talk for those unfamiliar with the show and its themes.
@Notrealmang6 жыл бұрын
When y'all doing bojack season 5 my dudes
@IanCookUS6 жыл бұрын
plz
@epsorks6 жыл бұрын
Need Jared back first my dude.
@supertigik6 жыл бұрын
holy shit its out, thank you for reminding
@marcuscarcus1596 жыл бұрын
bill nyen Calm does it just came out.
@CrypticBore6 жыл бұрын
Miss read the comments as the the wise crack video came out but you all meant bojack I binged that as soon as it came out.I loved it
@stevegovea16 жыл бұрын
This is how good this show has got in my head.... I woke up this morning and realized the connection between this show and The Wizard of OZ !!!!!
@philosophywithanirishaccen48493 жыл бұрын
This show sounds incredible! I can't believe I hadn't heard of it before now! Thanks so much for making this video
@lordfuture16 жыл бұрын
I love wisecracks return to deep philosophical quandries and examples. I always feel like I'm learning something when I watch this channel. And in the good place, bad place, or here on Earth which is probably the worst place LOL that makes me happy!
@Tabby34565 жыл бұрын
Show: has a point system based on ethics of individual China: this is the best thing!
@Yatukih_0013 жыл бұрын
The Good Place does not have a point system based on ethics of individual behaviour but rather results in a decision to introduce a system of reward for ethical behaviour which is actually the opposite. This makes the show bad for communist countries now. Sorry mate.
@elbruces3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for making the "No Exit" connection. That was something they never talked about in the show, even though it was the most obvious. "I'm not a literal hell monster." That is exactly something a literal hell monster would say...
@munjee26 жыл бұрын
But did micheal lie about the college kid who got everything right ?
@justlurkingat86 жыл бұрын
Munjee Syed damn! Now i wanna know too... Is Doug Forcett a real person? Or just a play on our feelings?
@camdensparks5246 жыл бұрын
Did he predict the good place being the bad place
@c.lawnmower_6 жыл бұрын
It would be pretty random if he was made up. I think he existed.
@casualpotato446 жыл бұрын
@@camdensparks524 Probably not. If we are to assume that Doug Forcett's predictions are real and not something that Michael just made up, he couldn't have predicted something that isn't a thing yet. Michael's good place switcheroo is first of its kind. And there's probably a million of good place neighborhood that is not secretly the bad place. If Forcett predicted it, Michael would be just copying Forcett's idea. When Michael was pitching the idea to other demons, there's no mention of Forcett. Could go either way tbh, there's plenty of ways to go around it coz there's not much to go on. But my bet is Forcett didn't predict it and switcheroo is solely Michael's idea.
@camdensparks5246 жыл бұрын
@@casualpotato44 I'm worried for your health
@steelbulwark80946 жыл бұрын
I'd like to point out that there is a flaw in the philosophy of presenting moral philosophers as successful. The more we think about how to think, the less we think about how to move forward. Just a bit of Solomon's Lamentations, think what you will :) I love this series, and I was glad you brought meta-ethics into this one. Keep up the good work.
@Tori.f.1166 жыл бұрын
I’m a fairly simple person. I see anything “The Good Place”, I click.
@netclips4k4 жыл бұрын
This video was actually the reason I started watching the show. Thank you so much!
@charlimorris15454 жыл бұрын
I think that it wasn't just the fact that Chidi was teaching Eleanor ethecs that made her a better it was also the fact that Chidi cared about her as that is the element that was missing in her human life and as she made more good choices she realised the impact the had on the world. Some times I think she also just found it hard to find a Reason. Is that really her fault though???
@danduhlion4 жыл бұрын
You just got me to start watching it. I was presumptuously assuming it was corny and putting off giving it a try. It still a tiny bit but I like corny too and I like the stuff you dug into. Thank you!! You just got a subscriber.
@SoniaSephia6 жыл бұрын
CHIDI! CHHHIIIDDDIII!! CCCCHHHHIIIIIDDDDIII!!!
@oof-rr5nf6 жыл бұрын
my dude my main guy the indecisive love of my life
@tishlinda6 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video; this is one of my favorites shows, I think it has been underrated for so long.
@TheOneTrueChad6 жыл бұрын
It's about forkin' time! First thing I thought watching this show was "why hasn't Wisecrack done like 50 episodes on this already?"
@lordfuture16 жыл бұрын
Brava Brava! I love the good place when it came out and I love wisecracks return to deep philosophical laundries and examples. I always feel like I'm learning something when I watch this channel. And in the good place, bad place, or here on Earth which is probably the worst place LOL that makes me happy!
@Grizabeebles6 жыл бұрын
Here's my take on what gets you into _The Good Place:_ "God does not play dice with the universe; He plays an ineffable game of His own devising, which might be compared, from the perspective of any of the other players [i.e. everybody], to being involved in an obscure and complex variant of poker in a pitch-dark room, with blank cards, for infinite stakes, with a Dealer who won't tell you the rules, and who smiles all the time.” -- Terry Pratchett That's the end result of consequentialism folks. Morality is so much shooting in the dark. Sometimes you kill someone, sometimes you show some doctors where to find some cancer. You just don't know.
@megelizabeth94924 жыл бұрын
Speaking of Good Omens, am I the only one who thinks that Crowley and Micheal would really get each other? The whole idea of “The Good Place”, is exactly Crowley’s style of evil.
@Grizabeebles4 жыл бұрын
@@megelizabeth9492 -- As soon as I realized that Michael's big idea was "hell is other people" the show never told another joke that made me laugh harder. I think the Crowley from Good Omens and the Crowley from Supernatural would BOTH get along great with Michael.
@colinmiller66496 жыл бұрын
Finally. I have been waiting so long for you guys to do this. I love this show and I your show. Keep up the fantastic work.
@BernardoPatino6 жыл бұрын
13:54 Why is no one talking about the mouthfeel?
@prashantmodia42192 жыл бұрын
Previously whenever someone who was mean to me earlier suddenly treated me right, I would just go cold on them thinking they'll always be like they were before and are presently faking it ! But now every time I think it, Michael comes to my mind n I feel like if a demon could believe that people can get better and can even help them in every way possible then I as a human must definitely give a try to what Michael believes in ....
@OninRuns6 жыл бұрын
Finally, someone talking about the mouthfeel!
@mfits5 жыл бұрын
This show definitely helped me because I am almost identical to Chidi in decision-not-making and seeing myself in this particular mirror made me work harder on myself. As Samuel Beckett said: "All of old. Nothing else ever. Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better".
@eliseweusthuis6 жыл бұрын
Isn’t “moral intuitionism” just empathy?
@kitthornton23366 жыл бұрын
You're half-right (which puts you way ahead of most.) Moral intuitionism is more than empathy, but moral intuitionism is impossible without empathy.
@lloydy2726 жыл бұрын
I'm not educated in philosophy but I think you're right. Maybe empathy with action, specifically action that helps. Not sure how unintended consequences get counted. Goodness me this is complex, I'll stick to science for now.
@laffy72046 жыл бұрын
No, the Golden means is an intuitive theory and it doesn't require empathy, but empathy helps. However, in some cases, too much empathy can end up supporting and tolerating jerks who will take advantage of your empathy by taking power or trolling you, or you might just end up trying to help through others struggle even when they clearly don't need your help, or worst, they might be worst off by not confronting their struggles. Empathy has limits too
@jsveterans69496 жыл бұрын
Brony Philosopher -Neato, good to know. Moral of the story? Everything and anything in an extreme is bad?
@note4note8046 жыл бұрын
Technically moral intuitionism can actually be better without empathy, as empathy is restricted in many ways to a concern for the individual whereas grand acts of moral right may sacrifice the individual for the greater good. At the same time a restricted empathy can actually help you prioritize your actions to act morally to those you value more, and as a result decrease how empathetic you are in order to be a better person.
@DamnQuilty6 жыл бұрын
This is amazing! I love the metaethics and the connection with No exit. Plus the very thing you pointed out about philosophy and practice. Which apart from the obvious discrepancies between theories and actions and the funny as hell rl trolley problem...it also manages to put ethical theory in subtler ways without the need of guiding the audience. Also this comes in time for season 3. I know it is not a popular series and thus not really profitable, but I would love to hear your take on Person of Interest. It is my favorite series after a wholeton of rewatchs and noticing stuff about the plot (the structure the story, the changes, narrative)the many characters(how they are presented, how they change, and their relations with others), and the many views and ideas shown and confronting or supporting one and other during the duration of the series.
@SgtAntsy98196 жыл бұрын
Why is no-one talking about the mouthfeel? ;)
@mhawang82046 жыл бұрын
I was looking for this comment and was not disappointed. Thank you ;)
@Beatness1216 жыл бұрын
Yup, that is the only thing I think of when I hear "mouthfeel" now
@jsveterans69496 жыл бұрын
Question: WTF is a mouthfeel? I can take a few guesses, but I would bank on missing the mark...
@DreamsDragon986 жыл бұрын
I might be a fool, but personally, my first exposure to the word "mouthfeel" was in a documentary about traditional Chinese cuisine, especially how it differs from what you might get from, say, a "Chinese take-out" restaurant here in the west. One of the things mentioned was that, in contrast to the west, where most of our interest is on the flavor and presentation of food, China traditionally has a larger focus on interesting "mouthfeel," basically referring to different textures, many of which are unpopular in the west. This was used an explanation for why more traditional Chinese cooking isn't as popular in the west, with what we do get being severely westernized. The documentary is on Netflix, I think it's the first episode of a Netflix Original series of food-based documentaries, but I forget the name. The quote, however, is about the difference between masculine and feminine penises.
@jsveterans69496 жыл бұрын
DreamsDragon98 -First, TY. Well defined. Second, I definitely was off the mark...
@buppy72826 жыл бұрын
I really think this opened a lot of windows for me. I've always thought that faith was believing in doing the right thing because I _wanted_ to do the right thing. Yet was always stumped from the love circles I got myself into, and dumb decisions I made. Angry decisions, and lustful confusion led me to believe maybe I was just a bad person. I didn't know that faith was perhaps wanting to do a bad thing, but then forcing yourself not to because that was _right_ ... I'm not sure how I feel about this realization, but I'm a bit shocked.
@512TheWolf5126 жыл бұрын
5:54 that's DEATH PARADE, that is for sure
@android19willpwn6 жыл бұрын
they really need to do Death Parade. It's so good.
@Oxcarthor266 жыл бұрын
This video got me into The Good Place and I love it haha thanks Wisecrack!
@rynegreen79026 жыл бұрын
Hey can you do a video of The Venture Bros?
@ctrouble23096 жыл бұрын
That would be fantastic
@AK907guy6 жыл бұрын
Go Team Venture!
@rynegreen79026 жыл бұрын
C Trouble I mean they do a video for every freakin Rick and Morty episode.
@Ignasimp4 жыл бұрын
Learing ethics is not going to work for everyone to become a better person, but it worked for Eleanor. Specially since she already had a predisposition towards getting better in the first place.
@lautaromedina90566 жыл бұрын
the philosophy of doctor who!
@jhnshep5 жыл бұрын
10:28 also the same demon that plays micheal also plays Sam from cheers, so you know, picked up a few things
@alfonsopayan096 жыл бұрын
Helen pass this comment to Jared “So how’s that cowboy bebop video going?” Love you kisses hope to see you more on wisecrack videos Take care
@oof-rr5nf6 жыл бұрын
I love it when people frame comments like letters, it is so forking cute
@JasonT4046 жыл бұрын
Please do more on this. I binged this show after watching this video. I need more wisecracks!!!
@aaronjohn61526 жыл бұрын
Predestination reminds me,can you do a philosophy on predestination
@fangal126 жыл бұрын
That movie is already a mind f, I'm pretty sure Wisecrack's philosophical breakdown of it would turn my brain into a warm gelatinous puddle of goo
@kierstengusler87593 жыл бұрын
The trolly delemia was used in another show I watched called the greenhouse academy, in that show they talked about emotions and how to be a leader and teamwork it's on Netflix
@edabakb6 жыл бұрын
I want Philosophy of Maniac, the new Netflix show.
@phissure30816 жыл бұрын
Awesome vid. I love this show. I would love it if you did a "The Philosophy of GLOW" video. That series has way more to unpack than I was expecting.
@MrTonyman796 жыл бұрын
Watching this video has made me want to watch this show, yet I won't because the twists were revealed. This is called a conundrum...or irony.
@BadBloodwillout6 жыл бұрын
it's still funny though, you should give it a try. Plus noone knows what's going to happen in the new season
@kevincarter20206 жыл бұрын
The bad place reveal kicked my ass
@markkoehr50036 жыл бұрын
You should still watch the show. The show is a lot more than just these twists.
@MrTonyman796 жыл бұрын
Ok, I will try it.
@jsveterans69496 жыл бұрын
Ikr, in the search to find out if you would like it you realize you would, had you not pursued the search..
@edwardrichards89476 жыл бұрын
YES! Thank you Wisecrack, I’ve been waiting for this!!
@thiagosimoes956 жыл бұрын
the philosophy of eric andre
@bella-tt9hk6 жыл бұрын
thiago s bird up
@patrickbateman42726 жыл бұрын
That calls for some RANCHHHHHHH
@trentrossdale6385 жыл бұрын
Yes Eric Andre's philosophy would be wild!
@schizophonic14795 жыл бұрын
I'll drink to that
@diegocamilo11225 жыл бұрын
My favorite video of this channel so far.
@cbishop414836 жыл бұрын
I like this show, especially that they're ACTUALLY in the BAD place!! Awesome!
@PapaSmurf11182nd6 жыл бұрын
Spoiler alert bruh
@wildcatste4 жыл бұрын
Never saw the parallels with No Exit-but now we can see that the show was really a rebuttal of Satre - what makes them better and makes their life/after life worth while is each other. The instruments of torture (each other) or also the instruments of improvement, feeling worthwhile and loved, and finding meaning.
@ModestMouseTrap6 жыл бұрын
mouthfeel.... Was this a reference to Contrapoints?
@plinioamaral67366 жыл бұрын
@Wisecrack, the philosophy of an oldie, but goodie: the games of "The Legend of Zelda". My feeling of Nostalgia would appreciate it. You're the best!
@tobinbones85776 жыл бұрын
hi random person “How you doin’?”
@uncomfortablecat6 жыл бұрын
I want to punch your face because you typed that line. You ruined my day.
@niggajuicextr46236 жыл бұрын
Alexander Ham- Wait that’s overused fuck you
@tobinbones85776 жыл бұрын
Everyone hates me 😁
@r.2826 жыл бұрын
Im killing myself today
@hayinka76916 жыл бұрын
Thinking whether to commit suicide or get high and masturbate.
@Wkumar076 жыл бұрын
The Good Place is a rare of example of how good the medium of television can be for telling interesting stories.
@Jingles64666 жыл бұрын
YES YES YES YES YES YEEEEEEEEES
@jsveterans69496 жыл бұрын
Great video! Might actually watch the show now... Thanks!