The Police Chief Had To Call Backup For Them!

Go to buyraycon.com/... for 15% off your order, plus get free domestic or flat fee international shipping. Brought to you by Raycon.
Second Channel: / @johnlang6593
Spotify: spoti.fi/439TpHT
Patreon: / audittheaudit
Twitter: / audittheaudit
Submit your videos here: [e-mail]
Sponsorship inquiries: [e-mail]
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: • Morrow city Police. Vi...
​​Jesse Cortez’s channel: / @jessecortez3675
Sources:
Articles-
bit.ly/45Cv27k
bit.ly/45wMmdM
bit.ly/43h5ZVO
Adderly v. Florida- bit.ly/3uBDAZH
Ga. Code § 16-7-21- bit.ly/45xuzDf
Ga. Code § 16-1-3- bit.ly/3OEV2ZD
Strange v. Housing Authority- bit.ly/3BZVN7P
Rayburn v. State- bit.ly/3osq9wR
State v. Harper- bit.ly/3N2QZVS
Bowman v. State- bit.ly/3OHIHDO
District of Columbia v. Wesby- bit.ly/425L5rf
Michigan v. Long- bit.ly/3xeDiLW
Megesi v. State- bit.ly/3oCLcwM
Ga. Code § 16-10-24- bit.ly/3IJor0T
Bailey v. State- bit.ly/3xZ2Xsg
Gainor v. Douglas County-bit.ly/3MXFm2i
Ga. Code § 40-5-29- bit.ly/3orTibz
Morrow Code of Ord. § 11-1-1- bit.ly/429lehZ
The District Google Listing- bit.ly/43fDZSf

[@AuditTheAudit]

Go to buyraycon.com/audit for 15% off your order, plus get free domestic or flat fee international shipping. Brought to you by Raycon.

[@matthewbrooks8512]

So, was the entire area and entrances marked as "no trespassing?" Kind-of hard to tell from the video?

[@buckaroobanzai4055]

Once again the fact that the police officer said that he was the law and that you must follow every order that a policeman gives you should have learned them an F but, nice bootlicking audit the audit you're a new love sucking that but man.

[@Tijuanabill]

Why is it legal for cops to admit they have a policy that violates the 4th amendment? Why isn't that a crime? If it's not a crime to deny rights, then do we really have them?

[@matthewbrooks8512]

@Tijuana It's corruption, just like how insider trading is "illegal," but they do it anyway under a different name.

[@wickdclown]

Raycon is overpriced rubbish 😂

[@justwannasharevideo1058]

It's fishy when the cops say "you almost hit me" then the trespassing claim gets brought out much later. If they thought it was trespassing, then be professional, ID yourselves properly as officers, and clearly state what the problem is. These cops were just hung up on "give me the ID" and lacked the common sense to state any reasonable basis for the stop until well after they had lied, threatened, and behaved unprofessionally. They seem like children not community servants.

[@mcraig2237]

I agree. And yet, Audit the Audit awarded those cops a "B" and awarded the motorist a "C". Makes no sense.

[@catlord539]

@@mcraig2237 from what i understand his grades are based on their behavior in relation to the law rather than in relation to being nice or something , a cop could be hostile but following the law and they are technically in the right but the fact that they were hostile would not matter as much as the fact that they followed the law, the comments are for determining grades and opinions that are based on different things that what AtA uses to determine his grades

[@nerdjournal]

@@catlord539 Well, did he miss the part where one cop literally said he hadn't done anything wrong or broken any laws. That they just ID EVERYONE who goes back there? I wish ATA would show me where that's at in the constitution. Or how he could give the man a C when the LITERAL information he was receiving was there wasn't any crime. I guess he's strung a bit too thin doing the content farm thing on KZbin these days.

[@svenjorgensenn8418]

@nerd journal he just wants money he doesn't care about these people. That's why civil rights lawyer is better

[@utubepunk]

You don't have to ID. If you came back after being trespassed, THEN you must ID.

[@loganrenew4660]

It’s funny how the courts always say ignorance is no excuse for violating a law, except when it comes to cops and qualified immunity

[@sirslickrock]

Not even just ignorance either the fact that they lie and lie until something sticks is what gets me. If you are righteously the law well say what you mean, mean what you say and be honest!! Don’t lie like a dirtbag full of slimy worms 🪱

[@krazyjae56]

🙌 exactly!!!!!!!!!!

[@FosterMcTeague]

You're comparing apples and oranges. An officer fatally shooting a person to death is a homicide. It is always unlawful for one person to kill another person without due process. However, some homicides are excusable. For example, a soldier fatally shooting an enemy combatant during a war is excusable homicide. A soldier fatally shooting an innocent civilian is not. In both the cases of the soldier and the police officer, while a law may be violated those violations within the scope of their authority (or for self-defense where we are guilty of a crime but that crime is excused for self-defense) is excused. The apple, breaking the law, is not related or comparable to being excused for breaking the law. Qualified immunity is a doctrine that does not excuse violations of the law by government agents but shields them from litigation.

[@MagnificentMelkior]

​@@FosterMcTeaguehomicide isn't a crime dummy, and that undermines your whole post. Lmao

[@dicksherman284]

You don’t understand qualified immunity. You’re literally just using it as a buzzword

[@desisshadow314]

"You almost hit me" "Suspicious vehicle" Changed his story within 5 seconds

[@tozjesoir7190]

Agree with him, why would you buy an Altima? That's suspicious

[@pieswimmer1]

​@@tozjesoir7190because black people have bad credit.

[@IDaireYou]

For real though, I noticed that right off the hop too. It was NEVER mentioned again during the entire interaction, nor acknowledged by the other officers about him nearly "hitting" the chief with his car. That should be grounds for investigation when law enforcement lie like that regardless of intent.

[@samuelc.9686]

I don't get why some cops get so angry at citizens who aren't outright breaking laws. They should be taught anger management and dealing with emotions in the academy 🤦

[@stuff4812]

lets not pretend that being a cop is a high enough paying job/funded enough to remove the human element of anger.

[@garfieldcouch4443]

Because they're small-town snowflakes who demand deference 100% of the time.

[@TCR2025]

That’s how They treat their wives (or husbands) at home

[@mr_moodypants978]

​@stuff4812 yeah but when u have power over someone don't u agree that if the person abused that power there punishment should be the max and much more Sevier

[@eko4749]

​@@TCR2025 following that logic i could assume youre prejudiced in your home life because you make such sweeping generalizations of groups of people.

[@reefnrod7159]

Here's how this was supposed to go: -Chief see someone trespassing. He politely introduces himself and letsdriver know the area is not open to the public and trespass signs are posted -Driver say's he didn't see them. Small chat about why they are there if they want and leaves the area. -The end

[@Jphizzle96]

that would be too normal for them. Maybe it would have wen like that if he was white though?

[@Ragnarok0312]

​@@Jphizzle96that or if it was just that second officer.

[@buttonsf3293]

@@Jphizzle96bingo

[@ChaseDaPlaya]

@@buttonsf3293don’t agree with an idiot and make them feel correct

[@newzerozeroone]

According to the guys own words he refused to stop for the unmarked vehicle in the beginning. So there's a reason the chiefs already hostile. The rest of the behavior isn't good but 1 he's in an area he shouldn't be. 2 he refused to stop for a police officer. 3 he's refusing to identify. 4 he's refusing to obey a lawful command on a lawful traffic stop. Etc etc.

[@samael978]

I wish this channel had playlists organized by state, it'd make it much easier to learn some rights that people in each state have

[@kevintiba7195]

That would be actually great

[@fml861]

I like this idea

[@mikeluv42]

!

[@kingnastyyyyyy]

this is a fantastic idea

[@iancaldwell6349]

Yah can they do this? Thats a great idea man!

[@eazy-t4833]

He’s got a point though why would you believe someone not in uniform that they’re a cop? Not like people impersonate police or anything.

[@oxyfee6486]

Even in uniform, look what happened in Nova Scotia, guy had a uniform and a police car.

[@Hey_Jamie]

@@oxyfee6486 that’s Canada.

[@nottheone7269]

​@@Hey_Jamie does that matter when it comes to impersonating a cop?

[@TheZlimshady]

@@Hey_Jamie I was on a certain Island in Norway when a "police officer" killed almost 70 people.

[@oxyfee6486]

@@Hey_Jamie It happens everywhere, there’s videos all over KZbin of police impersonator.

[@jaycarrillojc]

Another example of police blowing a misunderstanding out of proportion and treating them like criminals.

[@mcraig2237]

I agree. And yet, Audit the Audit awarded them a "B" and penalized the motorist with a "C". How does THAT make any sense?

[@jaycarrillojc]

@@mcraig2237 I don't wholly agree with the grading either. I think both parties were ill-informed.

[@mcraig2237]

@@jaycarrillojc You're right. Both parties were ill-informed. In that case, the professionals, the cops, should be graded tougher than the citizen...NOT more lenient. This channel is not on our side.

[@jaycarrillojc]

@M Craig I agree with you. The chief and the aggressive cop should have been graded separately. The black cop seemed to be the only one trying to reason with the man, but he quickly got overrun by the other two officers. The cop had a blatant misunderstanding regarding the total scope of his power.

[@mcraig2237]

@@jaycarrillojc Good points! All the more reason that the "B-" is far too lenient.

[@Xaaaach]

Honestly props to Policeman #2. Actually explained what’s going on, and was calm about it.

[@raging_n00b50]

And the dude was about to hand over his ID, but Mr major attitude wanted to swing his law enforcement 🍆 around. 🤦🏼

[@andrewwebb-trezzi2422]

“You will be identified one way or another”……yeah great job. Not.

[@strafer8764]

That’s funny

[@justins8802]

@@andrewwebb-trezzi2422was that inaccurate?

[@MrSigmatico]

Yes I liked him as well, he seemed very understanding and was trying to de escalate the whole thing, they had no reason to demand to see his ID other than their own pointless egos and ego should be grounds for dismissal from the policeforce.

[@MarcoS-yp9qf]

What an embarrassment to their town.

[@mtkoslowski]

I very much doubt it. It looks to me as though these people all have the same mindset, the police and the citizens alike. Therefore, I don’t believe the citizens would be embarrassed in the slightest and it’s a crying shame.

[@dishonoredundead]

So childish the way the one cop approached. Like little children, you could tell he told his big bwother on the mean old man who asked to see his badge. So he comes up all aggressive "WHAT'S THIS I HEAR ABOUT YOU NOT BELIEVING MY LILL BRO IS A COP?" "Uh, well I just think you need more than to just say you are.." "NO, NO, THAT'S ALL YOU NEED TO DO. HE SAID HE WAS SO HE IS!". Recited in his big boy voice. Literally stuff children do. It would be cute if they weren't so vile and dangerous.

[@cathmar7394]

Poster boys and role models. I am god and you will obey me.

[@revolutioninprint8906]

This is what happens when right winger rural hicks get a little bit of power. Do what they want.. OR ELSE.

[@mcraig2237]

I agree, but ATA doesn't think they're an embarrassment. He awarded them a "B-" and awarded the motorist a "C". Ridiculous!

[@nintendokings]

The fact the court found him guilty of disorderly is the scariest thing here

[@sheldonconk9526]

This country died a while ago.

[@madtabby66]

Yep. Our society is fallen.

[@joemachine4714]

He was trespassing (signs posted) and refused to ID himself, counter to state law. No?

[@AH-bo5gb]

no it's not, cortez got a c- for a reason.

[@svenjorgensenn8418]

@Joe Machine lol he asked why and the cops refused to. Thanks for supporting tyrants bub

[@notatheist]

He declined to provide ID when they clearly stated that he had committed no crime. Once the Major said he was criminally Trespassing, he followed all commands and provided ID. It really was straight forward.

[@YerpDerp17]

This is not at all true. lol Yikes.

[@geowa3724]

You trespass you get asked to leave. Your not forced to ID. Not to mention the “chief” wasn’t in uniform. I totally understand why he didn’t believe he was a cop. Plus his story changed from you almost hit me to trespassing. Everyone after didn’t help and just said, because we are police you do what I say.

[@alexblackburn2247]

True but in this instance, there was a sign that warned him before talking to police. So he was already trespassing. The police still acted gross and negligent tho

[@madtabby66]

@@alexblackburn2247 there was also a for lease sign.

[@matthewharvey3556]

Thing is, the sign technically already constitutes that “ask to leave.” So he was still there after having been informed he wasn’t allowed. That is a crime, and so obviously they can detain you and ID you at that point. SHOULD they, though? Of course not. They freaked out for no reason. The signs were not clear or prominent, and he was clearly not aware he wasn’t allowed there.

[@neek1232]

​@matthewharvey3556 no trespass sign does not mean leave. It means if you have no business here you need to leave. For example, I've seen plenty of no trespassing signs st post offices or random facilities. I had purpose to be there. It doesn't mean you just pull me over because of a sign lol

[@matthewharvey3556]

@@neek1232 It’s right in the video. 7:30-8:40

[@lawrencecunningham8994]

Why is it so hard for cops to just explain what is going on? "Do you realize this is private property sir?"

[@KeeleTasume]

Thats the same thing I thought. The first cop after the chief seemed like he was going to be able to de-escalate the issue and get an ID and move things along until the major stepped in.

[@mcraig2237]

Why should they bother explaining when their unprofessional behavior earns a "B" from Audit the Audit? I'm beginning to wonder whose side they're on.

[@KeeleTasume]

@@mcraig2237 Audit the Audit has very much always been on the side of are the police violating rights of the people and in some situations has been very lenient on the grading of some of the people despite how disrespectful they speak.

[@YourKingJDG]

@@KeeleTasumeHe does it on a legal basis for the most part, then the behavior comes second.

[@mcraig2237]

@@KeeleTasume I agree. This channel pretends to be an unbiased umpire, but they consistently give cops high marks and penalize we the people.

[@Robot-Overlord]

How the situation shouldve gone Officer: Hey youre in a closed area. Guy: this is a public park how is it closed? Officer: Oh i apologize you mustve missed the no trespassing signs we have posted (points at sign) over there. Guy: Oh wow, then im sorry, ill be on my way. Officer: Have a good day sir.

[@jackburton2680]

If only Cops will rarely not ID someone every chance they fucking get

[@purdhupley7864]

The "I apologize" is the biggest hangup to this scenario

[@Smedley-gr3gm]

you are dreaming about a good Government... it doesn't exist

[@SquirrelDarling1]

Like that’ll ever happen with either parties.

[@bobbyslaton3737]

ALL parties involved in this are guilty of escalating this.

[@WindRipples-]

That 3rd idiot he spoke to that pretended to be a movie cop is so absurd. I would sue the crap out of him and them all

[@newsnownorthkorea3836]

Yes waste your money on a lawsuit you are surely to lose….

[@joshp8535]

Right? Fucking dude cosplaying Stone Cold Steve Austin.

[@tracyhaverstick5672]

They lost that opportunity when refusing to ID. If he had just shown his ID, nothing would have occured. The driver was a jerk from the start.

[@CoolHandLouis]

For what lol

[@dreamcoyote]

@@newsnownorthkorea3836 Nope. The second dog in charge told him to stop recording. That is a lawsuit right there. It's is legal to record officers doing their job. They can't order you not to record.. at least not legally. He can tell him to put it down but he can't tell him to turn it off.

[@101000102]

What defense does the average citizen have when dealing with Police Imposters or those who do not identify themselves properly?

[@mcraig2237]

Good point. And yet, Audit the Audit awarded those cops a "B" and awarded the motorist a "C". Go figure!

[@drumlineking07]

In another video (on a different channel) a similar situation occurred and it was suggested to call 911 and verify that a real cop was pulling you over if you are stopped by an unmarked car or are otherwise unsure.

[@YourKingJDG]

@@drumlineking07multiple people have had armed stops or pit maneuvers for doing that though. It’s not a safe option either.

[@trukeesey8715]

Why are you asking youtube viewers? Shouldn't you be asking The Law? And learning how to spell "impostors"? Listen to Prem Rawat!

[@Neotidus]

@@drumlineking07 that is what you do

[@12FU]

“Get the hell out of here” is exactly what that power tripping officer needed to do.

[@theknightikins9397]

I swear, cops need to learn to better communicate. All he had to do was pull up to him and say “hey, this area is actually not a public area. It’s currently under a no trespassing zone. Can I ask you to just leave this park, thank you.” I can almost guarantee that the driver would have been totally fine with that but instead he chose to aggravate the situation.

[@YouveBeenMiddled]

I mean they could also put up a gate, rope or barrels to block the entrance... But then they'd lose out on revenue opportunities including searches and arrests.

[@mcraig2237]

Why should they bother explaining when their unprofessional behavior earns a "B" from Audit the Audit? This channel consistently rewards the bad behavior of tyrant cops. And, by way of comparison, the motorist got a "C". 🤥

[@madtabby66]

@@mcraig2237 because ATA isn’t the God of police behaviour? He just runs a KZbin channel.

[@mcraig2237]

@@madtabby66 What?!? Of course he just runs a KZbin channel. That's what I'm commenting about...his You Tube channel. I never said ATA is the God of police behavior. But since he has anointed himself a judge of auditors and cops, he too is open to criticism. If you don't get that, then I can't help you.

[@ronniebuchanan6575]

The deputy about had that taken care of til Mr Macho walked up.

[@PepeToTheMooon]

The 3rd cop acted like the dude was a guy who just robbed his mama. Has anger issues

[@Laocoon283]

He ain't putting up with this guys ignorant nonsense

[@gramps24]

@@Laocoon283 imagine being a cop and not being able to put up with ignorance

[@Laocoon283]

@@gramps24 I think he put up with it just fine tho... yall are just so sensitive that whenever someone puts some base in their voice yall crumble

[@mcraig2237]

@@Laocoon283 Just like those tyrant cops crumbled, right?

[@daveblackman816]

@@Laocoon283that wasn’t base lol . That cop wined like a baby and embarrassed himself. He belongs in a nursery.

[@DEMONsDVS]

With all these vids, I've honestly lost all respect and trust in the police, I'm lucky I've never had to deal with the police

[@forallthestupidshit3550]

I watch Code Blue Cam to help remind myself that some cops are cool. Every Wisconsin cop seems like an extremely chill, law-abiding, non-power-tripping, professional employee. It helps not completely give up on an entire profession.

[@kekerosberg1654]

lol he was in The wrong, not them

[@Abraxis-Gnosis]

I feel the same way. The number of bad encounters is alarming. The number of good encounters is negligible. But 99% of people are not going to upload videos of uneventful encounters.

[@Rome__king]

@@forallthestupidshit3550 all cops are bad otherwise backup and units wouldn't stand by as things go down. There is a whole police chief making a illegal citizen stop out of sheer emotion.... imagine having to be on stand by because of a "what if" scenario.... if there were such things as good cops the amount of videos on this channel shouldn't dwarf all the "good cop" channels lmao if its a normal occurrence of them being good.... no it takes a special person to be a cop and watch things go down ... that's just as bad

[@mcraig2237]

Know who hasn't lost respect and trust in these tyrants? Audit the Audit hasn't. ATA gave those cops a "B-" and awarded the motorist a "C". Whose side is he on?

[@thesuperdingos]

It’s the unneeded anger that’s what makes the cops get a D, not a B. The one cop went ballistic because he didn’t think he was a chief.

[@UlimateWarriorz]

Cops are usually the face of the community they work in. If they're going to act like that over a nothing burger, it's only going to make their community look bad.

[@samuelc.9686]

maybe you should run the channel

[@rykehuss3435]

In civilized countries, de-escalation training is key part of police officer training. It literally saves money, lives, and health of all individuals involved.

[@herbalman6337]

"BINGO🎯" "BINGO🎯", "BINGO🎯" !!!!!!!!!!! These 🤮👮‍♂️🐲thugs have shot & killed a unlimited amounts of Black unarmed citizens on film & off👌, its their 🤧stinking thinking attitude of minor crap & approach that catches most grown men off guard & causes most of them to very naturally react in like kind, mean while it's the exact situation that the👉🤮👮‍♂️🐲thugs love to very slyly create to pull their murder weapon out & doing what they do to unarmed Black & Brown citizens, to date my research has uncovered bout 8 thousand deaths since 2016 that these racist unlawful 🤮👮‍♂️🐲 thugs have committed under this so call Justice ⚖️ System 🤮⚖️🤣; "🙄GIVE🐲ME🤪BREAK 🤥PLEASE🙏WHY🤧DON'T🤮YOU🎯!!! Amen & Amen & Amen 🙏!!!

[@NA-kr5uq]

​@@samuelc.9686they should, they'd give out more accurate grades to tyrannical cops

[@Useless22]

This right here is blatant legal tyranny. Tyranny legalized by the state. Gotta love America.

[@joeyd7728]

How disgusting. These scumbags are out of control! It’s so infuriating! WE NEED CHANGE!!

[@mcraig2237]

I agree. But why should they change their behavior when channels like this one reward them with a grade of "B-" when they deserve an "F"?

[@Harkeilla]

It doesn't help that you are just sitting there watching videos about this kind of thing. If you want change,then actively do something about it.

[@majormarketing6552]

The police leadership are power trippers and every new hire will adopt from there.

[@mcraig2237]

Apparently, Audit the Audit doesn't have a problem with that. They awarded those cops a "B" and awarded the motorist a "C". It's clear whose side they're on.

[@eriklambert3809]

Grading is about legal and illegal, not about good or bad attitude.

[@mcraig2237]

​@@eriklambert3809 Okay, that angry cop said that people have to "Do what the police say." Is that the law? No, it isn't. That cop is the professional. He's SUPPOSED to know the law. The motorist is not an expert. So, why does the professional who is supposed to know better get a higher grade than the misinformed citizen? BOTH of them were wrong about the law, and yet the cop, the professional, got a "B-" and the citizen got a "C". That's biased, unfair, and illogical. And THAT is the point. Bad attitudes have nothing to do with it.

[@matthewharvey3556]

@@eriklambert3809I don’t agree; I’ve watched at least a hundred of ATA’s videos, and poor attitude and unprofessional behavior is a commonly-cited part of the grades “awarded.”

[@nickobot1235]

@@matthewharvey3556facts, this ones a bit weird

[@pikarret5048]

This is a example of the chief and judge being friends and lawyers won't take it cause they know it.

[@hashbrown4781]

Thug behavior by a gang that we are forced to pay for, not only for their service but also their countless mistakes. When will enough be enough.

[@bigb63fsu]

Go to Brazil and try that stuff on their police. You’ll never be seen again.

[@mcraig2237]

Enough won't be enough until Audit the Audit stops giving lenient grades to those tyrants. They awarded those cops a "B" and awarded the motorist a "C". Crazy!

[@madtabby66]

@@bigb63fsu So? Just proof that cops are bad all over. I grew up with cops. Put a few beers in them at a bbq and they’re laughing about straight up murking & graping people.

[@hashbrown4781]

@The Baltimore Angler I get it. There are much worse places. How can we call ourselves a free nation when every time I leave my home, I must be worried I might run into one of these thugs having a bad day and a power trip.

[@hashbrown4781]

@M Craig in all reality, these thugs did everything within the law. It is a sad place that this behavior is lawful, and that is what needs to change. The "tough on crime" has not worked for over 2000 years. Look over in Northern European countries that help people who commit crimes back into society. Crime rates are low and same with recidivism. If we bully or criminals, it just creates more.

[@RM-kc6qk]

This is proof not everyone has the personality or knowledge to be a law enforcement agent

[@darkhumorfunnyasf4936]

Almost no one has what it takes to be a genuinely decent cop

[@bradg3906]

Wouldn't the "For Lease" sign implicitly be an invitation beyond the trespassing signs? A store can have a No Trespassing sign in its window but that its open for business negates the sign and wouldnt let them instantly arrest anyone who walked in.

[@matthewlewis1735]

Why he should take it to court

[@gary9346]

It's typical sleazy cop behavior. Conflicting signage.

[@madtabby66]

@@matthewlewis1735 he did and lost.

[@lilpenguin092]

​@@madtabby66source?

[@eragon2262]

@@lilpenguin092 Hey Said in the video he went to court on the obstruction charge. they didnt charge him with trespassing so he can't fight that one.

[@daveblackman816]

“You must obey law enforcement because we’re a nation of laws.” Sheesh their attitudes were unnecessary. Just explain to the guy what he did wrong in a professional and respectful manner.

[@batchest4084]

Nazi mindset on that cop for sure

[@NuffinsMcDindu]

'Hey fellow human, this area has a trespass warning and you can't be here and will have to leave" then IF they continue to see him or see him return THEN all this could be done to him I guess but even then its some retardation

[@Not_Ciel]

I mean, he kinda did that before he said that line. I don’t get why you guys think him saying that one off line negates everything he explained to them beforehand.

[@TarellHudson]

@@Not_Ciel He wasn’t trespassing. By displaying a for lease sign, you’re inviting individuals to contact the property owner for inquiry. That bypasses your no trespassing sign. I can’t post a sign saying all visitors welcome while also displaying a no trespassing sign then pick and choose who each one applies to.

[@kekerosberg1654]

lol they just matched hes energy 😂

[@thesaltysorbet]

‘Did you just humiliate the chief’s fragile ego? You’re under arrest because we can’t control our feelings and it’s the only way I know how to self-soothe’ 😫

[@Lamp37820]

"hey man, this area used to be open but due to some unfortunate arson a few months ago the city decided to close it for the public unless there are events. Sorry for the inconvenience, but we need you to leave." How long do you think that would have taken?

[@atticusseverus]

Less then 3 minutes and 5 at worst adding that he was clearly out of uniform and such.

[@patrickschoenhut162]

The leadership not de-escalating and demanding ID right away, the uniformed officer, he was calm, willing to speak with the man. The leadership lacked professionalism and anyone could tell, they are tyrants and don't care for laws. It is sad to see how they handled themselves and abused their power.

[@AaronBurr04]

Was looking for this comment, uniformed guy deserves some credit but god damn they shoved him out of the way to start yelling at him again.

[@DanielJohnson-ps4xv]

I’m blown away by the whole all we have to do is say we’re police and you have to believe us. That sounds incredibly dangerous.

[@chaddon7685]

This country is broken in so many ways.

[@rickquist3992]

Thuggish law enforcement has earned all of the disrespect that they receive.

[@WoodsmanHobo777]

Any sane or reasonable person has to know that law enforcement are domestic terrorists.

[@karlagarcia1851]

@@TheDogGoesWoof69 says who? You 😂

[@karlagarcia1851]

Your absolutely 💯

[@christopher3922]

@@TheDogGoesWoof69agree

[@KenPhillips-kq6ex]

Tyrants

[@tracyseymour6059]

The thuggish behavior of these pigs is typical SOP. More citizens are challenging this behavior, and the cops HATE to be held accountable

[@zantar04]

Literally, all they had to do was tell him there was a no trespassing sign, and he is currently trespassing.

[@TheKensei777]

exactly. Im a security guard and i know that much 😅

[@BenjaminRegen]

Another mark in favor of disbanding blue gang who won't convert into true officers of the law. The blue gang special: fragile ego and hyperescalation.

[@BenjaminRegen]

Also your comment cannot get enough likes.

[@naughtmeenaym869]

This is the correct answer.

[@FrankThaTankST]

When they told him it was closed to the public "you cant be here" he repeated tried to leave they forced him to stay because they wanted his ID and when they couldn't get it they trespassed him he did try to leave when he found out he was trespassing.

[@ronhoward121]

This would be accurate if 1) the signs were not clearly posted and 2) if he had not been driving a car. As the driver of the car he has to provide I.D. and the police COULD let him go but are well within their rights to arrest him if he won't identify himself.

[@Harkeilla]

@@ronhoward121 That would be accurate if: he was driving at the time and it WAS a traffic stop - there is NO indication that this is the case. As well as the car NOT being turned on - only if the keys are in the ignition and/or the engine is running, can he be legally held to be in control of a car. When the engine is off and stationary, you can do whatever you want in the car.

[@ronhoward121]

@@Harkeilla I rewatched the beginning and it says the cop "stopped him". This implies it was a traffic stop. I had to double check though. The victim's first line is "You can't pull somebody over for..." implying he was pulled over.

[@jackburton2680]

Depends how clear the signs were. Other vids posted elsewhere on this in identity make the claim that the signs were not posted in a location that any driver could easily see them depending where they were entering the area at

[@wazza33racer]

What a mess, the chief of police made a mountain of a mole hill and escalated the situation for no good reason. Another public relations disaster, they are not helping their own situation.

[@samuelting1876]

We need to start holding these judges accountable. The judge is the one who found him guilty.

[@reginaeiland3604]

@samuel1876 • Probably the same judges who set free, sex offenders, and domestic violence offenders, without the requirement of bail!! Even if these miscreants offend while out, it NEVER affects the judges!!!!

[@QuirkyView]

The officer in uniform was being so nice and polite and helpful and doing everything an officer should, listening to the guy's complaints that the police chief was rude to him, deescalating, and then the second shows up and just immediately starts being rude and undoing all of that. Also Jesse definitely gets at least a B+ in my book. He made it perfectly clear that he didn't trust the random man being rude to him was police, and was perfectly ok with giving his ID to them when he didn't think they had the right, so long as they made it clear he was under the threat of arrest if he refused. Citizens can't be expected to know all the laws, including the times a person must ID themselves or is in their right to refuse to ID themselves, so stating that he doesn't think it's correct but will do so anyway if they force him to is the right thing to do.

[@svenjorgensenn8418]

Ata has been bad recently.

[@matthewharvey3556]

Definitely the only cop acting reasonably was the most junior one on the scene.

[@krazyjae56]

@@svenjorgensenn8418 I literally just said the same thing!!! I’ve never not agreed, for what it’s worth, until the last 3 videos.

[@joshuadalton6063]

Yeah it was a backwards rating. Jesse might have been wrong about certain facts, but he's a citizen and was acting reasonably and in good faith. The chef and major on the other hand are supposed to be not just cops but senior ones who should know better and handle the encounter professionally, instead they did as most cops do and just act like the hammer who sees a nail.

[@A6Legit]

100% the patrolman handled himself better than the major and the chief.

[@hannamariewilson]

I wanna see a judge respond to those demands to "turn that off"

[@mcraig2237]

I want to see Audit the Audit respond to those demands. They awarded those cops a "B" and awarded the motorist a "C". ATA thinks those cops did a better job than the motorist. Ridiculous!

[@Arvord]

@@mcraig2237 they did do a better job. The motorist was wrong he was trespassing and refused to give his ID. He has even less rights since he was in his car driving but that doesn’t even matter because HE WAS TRESSPASSING. The officers cut him a break your take is way off

[@mcraig2237]

@@Arvord My friend, the angry cop didn't know what he was talking about, either. He claimed that people have to "Do what the police say." That cop is the professional. He's SUPPOSED to know the law. The motorist is not an expert. So, why does the professional who is supposed to know better get a higher grade than the misinformed citizen? BOTH of them were wrong about the law, and yet the cop got a "B-" and the citizen got a "C". That's biased, unfair, and illogical. And THAT is the point.

[@private2809]

​@mcraig2237 I agree. Weird ruling. ATA seems to feel the need to appear "unbiased" and in doing so cuts too much slack to officers. Bring back the bias. Cops have enough "neutral" media spinning for them.

[@mcraig2237]

@@private2809 👍

[@jackreacts6466]

12:17 the “chief” smiling with a grin on his face what a power trip

[@slowbird]

I noticed that too. What a tiny tiny person.

[@logwhitley]

Feels like this could have been very easily defused by a competent officer

[@diamondmx3076]

Or a half-way well trained child. Pretty sure you could teach a 10 year old to say "You're not supposed to be here, could you leave" without getting angry. But apparently not these highly trained cops.

[@I.____.....__...__]

Absolutely. A proper cop would have simply pointed out the no-trespassing signs and ask them to leave, and warn him about getting arrested for trespassing if they don't. Nice and simple, no fuss, no muss, no arrest, no ticket, no paperwork. But cops don't work like that, they WANT paperwork, they WANT to GET TO arrest people, they WANT to steal people's money. They WANT to force people to obey them. So they won't just let them go unmolested. 😠

[@A6Legit]

3:37 was doing just fine until the big wigs came and had to flex their egos

[@Barriotales]

Cop said it’s not a law just admitted they are harassing

[@PsychedOut..]

This is one of the best examples of the ‘big boy’s club” mentality I’ve seen in ages. That Major was so outraged and angry that someone didn’t believe his little mate, his manliness couldn’t be contained any longer. Just an embarrassing amount of power-mad jobsworthing.

[@MCLuviin]

So you are supposed to give your ID to not-in-uniform-driving-unmarked-car person

[@crimony3054]

And arsonists aren't usually male-female couples driving in the middle of the day. The smallest compelling interest to ID the driver didn't exist, especially since the license plate was clearly visible... saw a car with your tags a day before the big blaze happened again.

[@lf3541]

Right? Like THAT is going to make anyone safer. Nothing like having your name in a database identified as a "problem citizen" as the country teeters towards civil war. We should all run down to our local precinct and sign right up for that privilege.

[@Barriotales]

We investigated ourselves and cleared ourselves of any wrongdoing

[@eroseland]

Logic fallacy: IF 'When an officer is informed during a traffic stop that a weapon, licensed or otherwise, is in the vehicle, the officer may secure the weapon for his protection. [Regardless of whether this particular officer felt personally threatened,] a reasonably prudent man in the officer's position would be warranted in believing that, because of the weapon's presence, his safety was in danger while he executed the roadside stop.' Roadside stopping cops had guns. Ergo, each and every individual stopped MUST, if reasonably prudent, believe their life is in danger. Cops are not here to protect you. Even the Supreme Court agrees. Cops kill three people a day on average, they are paid to lie to you. Cops are not your friends. Smile at them, wave at them, but don't ever talk to them.

[@fhu07]

The officer said that he didn't care if the judge threw it out?!? Why would you want to jam up the legal system with frivolous cases?

[@madtabby66]

As long as the guy kissed his and the judges ass. If the guy was an obedient peasant, then he didn’t care. But this guy was acting like the cops equal so needed to be punished.

[@anthonyoer4778]

The racket still gets court fees, legal fees, another court case justifying their budget all while not being accountable to any wrongdoing...

[@karlagarcia1851]

Because it’s more of who has more power trip.

[@I.____.....__...__]

Because he knows he can still cause plenty of collateral harm from the ticket at all like his insurance rates going up. We've seen many cases of people being harmed despite the charges being dropped from at little as wasted time (read life), to as much as actual death.

[@Anubis2X]

@@I.____.....__...__Exactly!!! There are many people who just pay the fine instead of appearing in court simply due to not having time off work. “Justice System” is harder on the poor and innocent.

[@buckeyenative1365]

"Hasn't found an attorney to take the case." And the reason why cops can do whatever they want knowing the chance they will be held accountable is slim to none.

[@atticusseverus]

Force the issue to an actual court, most of these vermin fake cops won't show, they know they'll get roasted.

[@limprooster3253]

He can't find an attorney to take the case because he has no case. He was trespassing. The no trespassing signs were his warning. They had a right to ID him.

[@naughtmeenaym869]

@@limprooster3253 Also correct.

[@veramae4098]

You can phone / email the department to complain. I do that occasionally; although in this case I thought the young man jumped to hostility much too quickly. Anyhow ...

[@blurined5351]

@@limprooster3253 The only thing done wrong was when the chief first asked to see his ID for "being suspicious" at first. He was in the right to not give his ID being suspicious isn't cause to ID though the cause did exist to ID and once a less angry more rational officer arrived and actual explained he was trespassing. You can make an argument an officer tried to violate his rights but its very flimsy since hew was in the wrong and that officer didnt end up doing anything and called for the backup that sorted the situation out

[@Persanity]

So you can just post signage saying no trespassing, while simultaneously posting for rent inquire within signage and then trespass those looking to inquire about renting?

[@auklin7079]

That "No Trespassing" sign looks like it referred to the PROPERTY, not the road in which he as driving. Unless the road was blocked off via pylons or something else, It's hard to believe and entire public road can be considered off limits by a single 'No Trespassing" sign posted in the way it was.

[@svenjorgensenn8418]

If you can get to it by public roads you cannot be punished unless you made a moving violation

[@polocisneros]

This wasn't about a man potentially trespassing over private property. This was all about a man that didn't bow down to authority of a civilian dressed Chief of police! 😏😒

[@FLIPPER1439]

I have to agree with you. It sure appears to be true here, but Cortez guy needed to STOP TALKING 🤐

[@mshacochis]

Anybody that wears that thin blue line on the american flag after seeing this u need to reassess life

[@newshodgepodge6329]

Their claim that he had no legitimate reason for being on a property that was marked by signs posting it for lease went right out the window the moment that entered the conversation. The appropriate response would have been for the cops to turn tail and walk away at that moment. But instead they doubled down on their stupidity by claiming that the authoritay of anyone in plain clothes claiming to be a cop must be respected without question. The "Chief" could have been a rent-a-cop (security guard) on a power trip for all the driver he was harassing knew, or even just some groundskeeper trying to flex. Like the driver said, GTFOH!

[@charleslescoe6617]

That second cop was pretty chill and calm but then when Major Dog the bounty Hunter showed up it felt like I was watching some bullshit scene from the WWE Dude came in hot and angry and yelling at everything for no reason

[@intandemdj]

Lmao 😂

[@stolasJC]

"It's all on video from us just turn yours off." Yeah, fuck that.

[@Barriotales]

The major needs an attitude adjustment

[@hashbrown4781]

You mean manager. These guys are civillians playing dress up military. They have no rules of engagement and inadequate training. We need to call these "sergeants, majors, etc." For what they are shift managers and general managers. They are civilians.

[@turc9808]

Too many posts, take a step back from keyboard

[@mcraig2237]

The major doesn't need an attitude adjustment according to Audit the Audit. They gave the cops a grade of "B-" and punished the motorist with a "C". Go figure!

[@Barriotales]

@@mcraig2237 ATA turning into a bootlicker lately

[@QuantumRob-yt]

Geez I hope this cop doesn't have any kids. We might want to start a gofundme for them if he does. It will take years in therapy to recover. He clearly talks down to everyone with no respect. Not one of the officers tried to have an adult conversation and escalated immediately. This is the kind of guy that beats a person and then tells ya he was helping you the whole time.

[@samuelc.9686]

FR. "You'll understand when you're older" Type guy. That saying is a classic example of manipulation and gaslighting.

[@Internal_Investigation]

Deffinatley abuses his wife.

[@patl3443]

Tyrants have 40% d.v. rate...and that's supposedly ppl they love. They hate the Americans so just imagine what they will do to us

[@mcraig2237]

You're right. And yet, Audit the Audit awarded those cops a "B" and awarded the motorist a "C". Sigh!

[@Tar-Von]

​@@mcraig2237 His ratings are based on legality and efficient use of rights, among other things.. -- Not emotion. I get your point, I just think you misunderstood the reasoning behind the grades.

[@atmads]

When I was a teenager, a plainclothes man approached my boyfriend, showed him a badge, and said he had to go with him. The next day, my boyfriend's body was found in a pond a dozen miles away. The man who had approached him was a serial killer. There is no way in hell anyone is getting anything out of me unless they're in a uniform and a marked car. I'm not stopping unless I'm surrounded by the public and I'm damn sure not giving up ID or going with them. For better or for worse. They better send a uniform.

[@sergeantspeed5941]

This entire thing could've been avoided by the first sentence being " hey man this area is off limits, could you please leave?"

[@mcraig2237]

I agree. So, why did Audit the Audit award those tyrants with a "B-" while punishing the motorist with a "C"? It's because this is a bootlicker channel. They consistently reward the bad behavior of cops.

[@EveloGrave]

@@mcraig2237 Thanks for the comment. Gave me a good laugh.

[@mcraig2237]

@@EveloGrave 👍

[@thecalmgoat]

@@mcraig2237 AtA very rarely gives a higher grade to cops than the citizens.. I don't know what you're on about. Check out more of their vids. More often than not, I see more cops getting F's than A's compared to the citizen equivalent. In fact, I don't think I've seen a single citizen acquire an F on this channel. Maybe there's 1, but there's at least a huge handful of instances where the cops get an F. He was driving a vehicle, so technically that's one reason for asking to ID themselves. It was handled poorly on both sides.

[@tonyayoung7305]

Exactly!

[@davidkennedy3050]

The initial officer initially and directly stated he had no reasonable suspicion of a crime. This was escalated purely for the protection of the officers ego. This must end or they will loose all support.

[@tolstoy143]

His only ‘offense’ was contempt of cop. And a non-uniformed one at that.

[@BIGGYMIC63]

Trash tried to say the man almost hit him smh

[@TheAussieMericanShow]

Bro that Major is the physical embodiment of the reason people hate cops. This is what happens to the kids who get bullied and never stand up for themselves. Sad af. Stand up for yourself and others yall

[@karlagarcia1851]

He is a piece of 💩 💯 . I can’t imagine how many people he violated people rights

[@SGTSMOKEY8901]

I find it very interesting that the officers were so concerned about the Trespassing that they never even asked for an ID from the second trespasser/ passenger. -Retired LE SGT

[@jackburton2680]

She prob was white and this not deemed to be suspicious...even if she technically would have met their absurd bullshit claim of trespass as well

[@buttonsf3293]

I'm guessing she lacked the level of melanin that cops feel gives them the right of violent behavior

[@oinkytheink1228]

Don’t officers usually want to if the driver/owner of the vehicle over anyone else? (Idk if this is saying police are racist or anything I am just stating my thoughts’)

[@hemmojito]

Why do you always have to squeeze out of them what this is about? They're always immediately personally offended. Just say it. The law is on your side officer. Nothing to hide here. Just say what this is about. No we have to get personal, we have to get in your face, we have to threaten violence or arrest or worse, we have to escalate. SMH The aggression is the reason why we are reluctant: "If police says jump you say how high, sir?" That's their attitude. They were right but the escalation was unnecessary.

[@HurpMuhGurp]

The chief of police passed away last year, here's to the hope that the new chief can approach minor problems without excessive aggression

[@jerseyshoredroneservices225]

Hopefully that major will soon visit the chief

[@stickyoxtail]

Some good news. Thank you. 😅

[@danielseelye6005]

I've got the feeling they promoted from within and made the Major into the new Chief.

[@I.____.....__...__]

He did? I guess he doesn't have a s-eating grin on his face anymore. He doesn't even have a face. 😂

[@SasquatchChief]

So you’re saying there is justice in the world.

[@jefferykeeper9034]

When are they going to realize that one bad cop makes them all look bad, The chief could have handled this a lot better by saying you do know your breaking the law by being here please leave.

[@TommyJonesProductions]

Not all cops are bad. It's the 99% who give the rest a bad name.

[@jackburton2680]

Saw this covered on another channel months ago, can't remember where. Cops openly admit initially that they didn't stop or detain him for violating any law but based solely on him looking suspicious. Law enforcement had no legal justification to demand ID, and depending on where the trespass sign was posted and how visible it was, no right to stop him in the first place

[@nintendokings]

When people say ‘defund the police’, this is the shit they mean. Why do you need all these cops (on high salaries & pensions) driving around a bit of public property harassing passers-by

[@Sunny31310]

This and cops thinking they need armoured vehicles and to be kitted out like soldiers..

[@Keatongaming1]

A person who was pulled over that was inside a horrible arson incident and was trespassed out of the public and had a weapon does warrant a higher response especially if they aren’t cooperating with police officers. It really could of turned out differently if it was someone who was more on edge than this citizen and not for the better.

[@Not_Ciel]

You’re assuming they’re doing it to get lazy arrears but they clearly stated they had a lot of problems with people being in that area before. Without more context we don’t know if someone got stabbed to death there or just trespassed there before. Furthermore, only one cop was there until he called backup. Where is this “all these cops” you’re talking about?

[@unhingedgamin2706]

Yeah but who you gonna call when someone is trying to rob your home? Who you gonna call when someone is committing a crime. Removing money from the organization meant to uphold the law isn't the idea. We need more stringent ways of weeding out the bad cops.

[@nintendokings]

@@unhingedgamin2706 our house has been robbed twice and I called the police. Wanna guess what they did for me? Nothing. After the second time we invested in more deterrence like cameras etc and since then no problems. I’ve lived in both the US and Europe and can guarantee you the US is over-policed.

[@gregkasza1925]

Obedience! That’s what they demand of us. When we are not, the abuse starts.

[@jackburton2680]

There's Plenty of cases where cops trample the rights of the citizenry even when someone is complying and being "obedient"

[@veniagivenchy1532]

I don't like the one who walked up being aggressive, talking hard & loud, ways ! Like he's so bad & talking to a child . Chile... Y'all police officers be doing the most, ego tripping, & power tripping because of a job, title, & badge . Everyone isn't scared of y'all ! There's people who will stop you !

[@misshippi971]

These officers are out of control. The rudeness level is off the charts

[@mcraig2237]

And yet ATA gave them a grade of "B-". That tells you whose side this channel is on.

[@tomc.4860]

I'm sure this interaction with these police officers and the court system has taught this man to trust and respect the police and the courts.NOT!!

[@DocHammer-ep5zh]

"When Injustice becomes Justice resistance becomes every Americans Duty to throw off all oppressors foreign or domestic" Thomas Jefferson....

[@nathantripathy]

I love the backwards logic of simultaneously not letting someone leave and also charging them with trespassing.

[@antoniosanjurjo8442]

What is most annoying about them is how they feel the need to talk down to people.

[@atticusseverus]

Esp that trash 2nd. He clearly believes himself above anyone else and anyone that dares to question must be put down.

[@BIGGYMIC63]

Hope he sues the token also ijs

[@temporaryscars]

Wouldn't "for lease" and "no tresspassing" signs negate each other?

[@demaris2810]

You would think so, but No, they don’t be gay each other. I’m a real estate broker. It’s not unusual. Sometimes there are dangerous conditions on the property or animals.

[@pkennedy0219]

Just because something is for lease doesn’t mean it is open to the public to go view.

[@temporaryscars]

@@pkennedy0219 how else would they enquire about it or check it out?

[@seamusperkins2526]

​@@demaris2810 your auto correct betrayed you

[@brianrobinson9979]

What about the "Lease" sign that he spoke about in the beginning? I like how the police never responded to that aspect of his reason for being there. What if there was not a phone number on the property lease sign to call and he thought that there would be a building to check in at to inquire about leasing the area? I feel like this whole interaction could've been handled better by the police chief if he had just said: "Oh, you're interested in leasing an area of the park? Here's the phone number for _____" or "If you go to this place, you can set up an appointment to visit. But at this time, this location is closed to the general public without a permit." And sent him on his way. After all, he had verbalized that, because it wasn't gated/blocked off, he thought that it was still open and that with the knowledge that it wasn't, that he would leave. But when an officer starts barking orders without expressing a reason why (especially when said officer has no markings or badges showing that he's an officer), the "suspect" in question might not believe him and become defensive. Police are supposed to have "thicker skin", and when a citizen isn't showing any hostility towards an officer like this guy wasn't, this police "Chief" could've easily just made this a calm and cordial interaction. But he had to go and treat him as if he was a criminal right from the start. The old saying goes "In order to get respect, you have to give respect." And so many officers nowadays seem to feel entitled to receive respect no matter what because they have the uniform and badge.

[@JustNotIt9927]

Awesome video, but uh just a warning for anyone that sees this comment, DO NOT buy raycons. They may be cheap, but that's because they are absolute garbage. You would be better off buying earbuds for a similar price from Jabra, Sony, Bose, Samsung, etc. I bought Raycons myself, and I had many earbuds at that point, and Raycons by far had THE worst sound quality, watch any actual audiophile review on them, they all say Raycons are dogwater.

[@downhomesunset]

So cops can secure firearms for their safety. Can we secure their firearms for our safety? Cops certainly have shown how quickly they can become unhinged in a hurry!

[@vh2577]

Yes they can. They can terry frisk a vehicle.

[@oinkytheink1228]

There is a city in Georgia where you legally (this is not enforced in there anymore) must own a gun do to how bad the crime was there 42 years ago

[@oinkytheink1228]

Actually this doesn’t relate to the discussion so if you are interested by my statement go for it

[@Wild-Moonchild]

Yes! I do not so much fear the cops as I fear their itchy trigger finger.

[@HexproofAnarchist]

Somehow cops have more rights than us.

[@butch1dc]

How was he legally obligated? They were there to see something for lease. He should have been asked to leave and that should have been the end of it.

[@ronhoward121]

If he had provided his I.D. as legally required, that would likely have been the end of it. But I don't deny that the chief of police here was escalating things because he felt disrespected. However, he had the legal right to demand ID.

[@newsnowwyoming1757]

The only part i agree with the driver on is obeying the commands of the police chief. The chief had no identifying stuff saying he was a cop. I would hope no judge would uphold any arrest for refusing to obey a non uniformed officer without proof of a badge. That seems like VERY dangerous precedent.

[@kjvmsc]

B minus? Get outta here ATA. This man was shaken down because of the hurt pride of a police chief in plainclothes, a Major with an absolutely unacceptable temperament, and was told to "shut the f*** up." Grade public servants by more than how their conduct is within legal constraints.

[@mcraig2237]

ATA consistently rewards the behavior of tyrant cops. How can they give a HIGHER grade to those tyrants than they gave to the motorist? ATA isn't on our side.

[@svenjorgensenn8418]

Please unsub, do not award this behavior. The algorithm rewards positive and negative interaction

[@mcraig2237]

@@svenjorgensenn8418 Good point!

[@kjvmsc]

@@svenjorgensenn8418 done. I support both the auditing community and good policing, but have seen too many soft-ball cop ratings from ATA

[@ronhoward121]

The purpose of the channel is to discuss the legality of police/citizen interactions, but you want the final grade to be based not on the law, but personal perception. The grades are more useful as they are objectively defined. Ultimately, a grade can't fully encompass any interaction, so perhaps you should listen to the reasoning surrounding the grade and ignore the letter of it. Did you disagree with the summary of the interaction?

[@1966Heath]

This illustrates one of the biggest problems with law enforcement- these cops may well have been acting within their legal authority, but showed no judgment in escalating a situation where it was perfectly clear no real crime was being committed. How hard would it have been to simply tell their “suspect” he was ACCIDENTALLY trespassing and then send him on his way. If identifying him was so important they could easily have noted his plate number. Cops have too much power and too many of them don’t know how to exercise it.

[@phukyerpheefees]

I wouldn't have identified myself to the Chief either. I wouldn't have even acknowledged them. I would have immediately called 911 to report that a vehicle with no official markings and a man in plainclothes was claiming to be law enforcement. I would ask them to confirm whether this person was actually law enforcement or just impersonating them. It's fairly common for criminals to put flashing blue lights on a vehicle to impersonate officers for nefarious purposes, and this chief should have properly identified themselves with a badge, which would have cleared up the situation immediately. Instead, he got hotheaded and belligerent when asked to provide his credentials. I give the Morrow police a D- and ATA's grading an F.

[@yomamma.ismydaddy216]

Damn I wanna start a police agency that only polices the police

[@theaterinafire]

the younger officer, despite being incorrect about the law, was trying to be kind and respectful and seems to be aware that the behavior of his superiors is unacceptable and looks uncomfortable with them. hopefully this will serve as a lesson to him and the next generation of officers on how NOT to behave.

[@atticusseverus]

Or he'll get out while he's still young and leave those fith to burn.

[@I.____.....__...__]

Do you mean the one who said "they just tryna ID ya" as if that's not a problem? 🤔

[@A6Legit]

​@@I.____.....__...__Well according to ATA it wasn't a problem and they had that authority. Did you miss that part?

[@erkl8823]

In reference to your asking of citizens to better educate themselves on the law, how the hell does one go about that education??? With how long & drawn out the laws are, & with the sometimes ridiculous language used therein, how is any normal person supposed to have time to read the MILES & MILES of paperwork, let alone have the education necessary to understand it?? Laws should be plain languaged & as straightforward as possible, & also should stop using tes like "reasonable" that have to be *interpreted* .We need to hire some legal geniuses (such as yourself? Maybe..?) to sit down in groups & start scaling these things back so normal, public high school educated people can actually understand what the law is & how to deal with situations like the ones we see on this channel.

[@leodouskyron5671]

Disrespect of cop was what was being charged here. And the court was validating poor relationship with the public. This was a “D”. There is a reason people hate and are almost violent hateful of cops. This should have been handled totally differently.

[@colin6246]

No, absolutely not. The person in the wrong in each of these cases should by default have the lower letter grade. A “B” grade is fine. I don’t understand why people get so upset when cops raise their voices, I have a feeling most of you live sheltered lives.

[@jaisonjensen6209]

​@@colin6246if a Walmart employee yelled at me while I was there I would be upset. If you say you wouldn't be upset in that situation then I think you're lying. If employees of private companies are supposed to be professional then cops absolutely should be required to be professional. If you have the power to strip someone of their freedoms and even use force, then you have no business being in the role unless you can conduct yourself calmly and professionally at all times.

[@colin6246]

@@jaisonjensen6209 If I was destroying products, trespassing, or doing anything else that is outside the normal function (for lack of a better word) of Walmart, then no I wouldn’t be upset if they raised their voice. As they’d be justified, like the cops were in this particular situation.

[@jaisonjensen6209]

@@colin6246 destroying products is not the same as believing they are on public property when they are not. Your argument is flawed and baseless.

[@diamondmx3076]

@@colin6246 Because an angry, armed person is dangerous. If someone has self-control issues, then they're not fit to be a cop. Cops acting like out of control children is why people get hurt.

[@frank_bee]

cmon.. the cops were wrong. the couple didnt know about the new rules there.. and some old regular dude comes up, claims he is the chief

[@drewdude80]

Unlawful detainment, RAS and/or PC did not exist of Trespass. No opportunity was given to leave. AtA got this one blatantly wrong per the very law cited in video. Trespass is when someone who has been told to leave stays or comes back after being told to leave or signs are posted.

[@fuferito]

It's become an old saying on this channel, I know, but I am constantly amazed (but not surprised) how what ought to be a cordial and civil encounter instructing someone they're in a restricted area can be totally ruined and made worse by Law Enforcement and their contenptuos demeanor against law abiding citizens.

[@mcraig2237]

Yes, and yet this channel gifted the cops with a grade of "B-" and punished the motorist with a "C". 🤨

[@WeirdDiaperDonDraftDodger]

Why should anyone stop for, or open their window to an out of uniform cop? Just because they say they are a cop doesn't mean they are. Laws need to be written and be clear on that!

[@rugbyguitargod]

not defending the Chief of Police at all, but he was wearing a polo shirt with their department insignia and was also in an unmarked patrol vehicle which is quite common. I do believe that if they are dressed in that capacity, they should have their badge immediately visible to a driver upon a traffic stop. That being said, he still refused to provide ID when the other cops showed up and confirmed that the original officer was, in fact, the Chief of Police. This guy made shit 100x harder for himself and there's a reason that no attorney will pick up his civil case and that's because he was 100% in the wrong with how he conducted himself in the stop. The CoP and his 2nd In Command though were super aggro and escalating shit way more than was necessary for a simple trespassing stop.

[@Jimbo0341usmc]

@@rugbyguitargod also, you don’t have to provide an id unless you’ve committed a crime. It’s ignorant people like you that keeps us from moving forward when it comes to holding our Nazi police departments accountable. You are the problem

[@user-kk2ni8mt2d]

I thought he they said he was in his own personal car and had a light on top that can come off. I'm not stopping for an unmarked car

[@amandamaynard1839]

No all they have to say is “ I’m the police” didn’t you hear the tyrant in the video!!!!!

[@BenjaminRegen]

Massive window for abuse, not only by police but by anyone willing to CLAIM they are.

[@implokusmaximus]

This is why some people don't respect the police. The rude interaction is awful. A simple explanation would have been sufficient.

[@Idafireman]

B-? How does hostile activity by law enforcement justify an above average grade by this site? I enjoy the knowledge shared by this site, but must admit I don't agree with many of the grades you assign subjects.