The Quest to Reach ONE BILLION Points in 2,500 Rolls! - Roll

[@Aliensrock]

Exponential growth is so satisfying. Wouldn't it be cool if my scores could exponentially grow as well

[@danthiel8623]

Nice

[@alacer8878]

Hell yeah brother.

[@greentornadofx]

I like this game

[@zeo4391]

lol

[@suedempress]

Yeah if your sub count could as well that be cool to

[@xraidev]

Wow… amazing score! I am working on making the text descriptions clearer about what they mean, they can be pretty wordy and inconsistent, but I’m glad you are figuring it out. I am also working on lifting the integer limit, reducing lag, better leaderboard connectivity, new upgrades, and experimenting with some new game modes… as well as a mobile version!

[@klausklaus8092]

Reducing lag would be really appreciated! I'm currently on a run with over 600 dice and 500 rolls left, but I don't think my PC will handle rolling any further 😬

[@Xenos6666]

glad to hear there are still so many plans for the game, I want to play the game more but I'm scared of actually hitting the integer limit in a good run at some point and not having anything else to do afterwards

[@gamewarrior348]

Can you make a way to clear your high score? My game bugged and my “high score” was not achieved by me and the name is not my steam name

[@adeptmage2293]

Dude mobile? Sweet!

[@12-343]

Do you plan to make a Linux port? I'd guess it works okay with Wine, but it would still be appreciated.

[@shadowflamelightburst4503]

Addressing the “face multiplier” adding passive misconception, if we are being extremely picky we notice single face multipliers aren’t just basic face multipliers while the ones that actually do work say they replace other *face multipliers* in their description, as well as the fact the picture of the passive shows the multiplier in the top right, leading me originally to the assumption of it being those kinds of multipliers

[@Jimbobu76]

I love your pfp

[@spyresoblazx]

I feel like the game needs a glossary

[@Patashu]

Came here to comment this too

[@tsnthesilentninja6889]

Alpharad and this? Good taste

[@Skwerll]

What tipped me off is that the icon for the passive has the multiplier in the corner

[@RafaelHB]

The leaderboard's highest number is the 32 bit integer limit multiplied by 100,000,000. The counter probably starts ignoring the least significant bits of your score after a while for the sake of being able to store bigger numbers

[@wulf2623]

In other words, the maximum score you can get is two hundred fourteen quadrillion seven hundred forty-eight trillion three hundred sixty billion.

[@kalebanderson7483]

A fellow rotmg player

[@stephenhousman6975]

@@wulf2623 I think you are off by a factor of 2 roughly. What you wrote would be the 32nd digit (2^31) but to require 1 less than the overflow you need (2^32-1).

[@jessveness]

@@kalebanderson7483 I quit rotmg some while ago, but yas, rotmg fans rise up Will you play BTN when it comes out?

[@jetison333]

@@TexasRed75 considering that the score will never be negative, it could be an unsigned int.

[@whatd0605]

Can't wait for "Twitch Plays Roll" and everyone's just buying locks.

[@RubyPiec]

whats a lock

[@alfonzomyriandes3843]

@@RubyPiec Locks lock dice. they cant roll. and basically it multiplies die.

[@RubyPiec]

@@alfonzomyriandes3843 ohh

[@altituderaven3889]

@@RubyPiec die is not rolled for x amount of rolls, after x amount of rolls the die is copied and unlocked

[@Lance0]

nah, twitch plays roll and they're stuck at 1 dice rerolling shop to waste all their money/pips

[@brennanruiz1803]

Can confirm, 2,147,483,647 is the integer limit for signed 32 bit integers. Not sure why it'd store as a signed int, though, instead of unsigned, considering it can't go negative.

[@xRoGeSx]

long long unsigned int__64 all the way baby

[@henrymccoy2306]

I watched another guy sifd get to 5 trillion but I think the leaderboard broke. The dev commented on the video saying he was fixing it so its almost certainly not going to be stored that way now, assuming it ever was.

[@Ammar2009y]

A 32 Bit Game transforming into a 64 bit game? Mindblowing!

[@banzooiebooie]

Some strategies goes for all 99 dice and use the yatzee multiplier. You can level up one face to 99 and then copy that face to all faces and then copy that die multiple times. Another thing people apparently goes for are the passives. They level up the shop immediately to max and tries to get good passives.

[@grantdixon36]

Just tried a yahtzee run, I think it’s better to have incrementer passives than to try copying 1 die, that way you can add multiple 1 dice and they turn into 99s in several rolls

[@KaeraNeko]

Ayy, I got to make a cameo for a split second. That's me in 20th place on the leaderboard. A couple of the hacked scores were removed since when this video was recorded, so the last time I checked I was in 18th. I've never tried going for a weight strategy yet, so I'll have to try that out at some point. I usually just fill a die with single face multipliers so that they're always guaranteed to multiply _something._ Word of advice: Wilds and Total Roll Multipliers don't stack. It even says so in their respective descriptions, I think? Oh, and this might be kind of obvious, but there are ways to meet the conditions for a *LOT* of passive upgrades at the same time, which can end up netting you multiple trillions per roll.

[@thatonegooze]

It'd be cool if you could make a video on this game showing your strat

[@KaeraNeko]

@@thatonegooze I'm still learning how things work, really. The gist of my strategy is to try to only use 4 or 5 dies in total. if you have 5 or less, there's the passives that increase the value of all your dies if you have less than 6, and if you have 4 dies, you can also get the passive ability that increases the value of all dies when your total amount of dies is a square number. the drawback of stopping at 4 is that your shop isn't fully upgraded, so you're less likely to find powerful faces to use, and I'm still not entirely sure which number of dies is the optimal one. other passives that are helpful are the ones that increase the value of primes, and numbers divisible by 2 and/or 5. primes have the best score potential, and I believe 97 is the highest prime you can use, but having all numeric faces set to 80 is a good second best option since that's the highest number that's divisible by both 2 and 5. I'm still not entirely sure how this all is affected by the passive that massively increases the value of die faces below 13, but in that case 13 should be the highest prime number, and stacking that with things that increase the value of doubles, triples and yahtzees can probably end up being extremely broken as well, but I'll need to experiment more with this before I know for sure. needless to say, if you're going for a specific numeric strategy, you'll want to stay away from incrementors and passives that increment your dies, since you'll lose your bonuses. I try to stay away from them either way, since there are some passives that increase the value of all dies if no die is 99. another couple of immensely valuable dies are the total roll multipliers and previous roll multipliers. I usually try to get one previous roll multiplier on my single face multiplier dies, because those are usually the ones that generate the highest score. these stack with total roll multipliers and wilds, so if you get a x10 single face multiplier on your best numeric die, followed by a roll where both the x10 previous roll multiplier on the same die, as well as a x10 total roll multiplier land at the same time, the roll result approaches ludicrous. I'm pretty sure this can be broken even further by using void faces since they add an _additional_ multiplier on top of it all. another thing I try to do is that if there's a passive ability that's useless, but won't affect my strategy, I still buy it if I can afford it, just to have a greater chance to get different passives when I reroll the shop. I hope this made sense and is of any help. :) (I got some ideas for additional strategies to try out while writing this as well, so maybe I really should make a video on this, even though it would be a first for me :p)

[@PvPsFinests]

If you look in the description of "multiplier" it is technically a face multiplier. The thing you were mistaking as a face multiplier is a "single" face multiplier. Also in the description of the multiplier it says it doesn't stack with single or multi face multipliers.

[@trinityy-7]

this game really needs a freeplay mode so you can do stuff like “how fast can i reach a trillion”

[@toffer2696]

or just a gamemode where you can play without a roll limit and just see how insanly high the numbers could gey

[@UnaturalShadows]

Maybe the game just isn't prepared to deal with those numbers; it looks like it overflows in the trillions based on the leaderboard

[@aaaa-hj9vv]

@@UnaturalShadows maybe not yet but as a software developer myself, I don't think it would be too hard to have a mode that uses arbitrary size integers.

[@altituderaven3889]

Around 10 trillion the game lags so bad it takes forever to go through each individual roll my 50 trillion point run took 2 days to finish with an auto clicker because I eventually said screw it

[@bullshitman155]

@@aaaa-hj9vv yeah... Dynamically allocated VLQs should do the trick.

[@PopeMical]

Those high scores are the 32 bit integer limit, without the 0s, and I wouldn't be surprised if there was an infinite money machine you can make.

[@pvic6959]

just by the fact that you have a finite number of rolls, you will have a finite number of points (even if its insanely big)

[@TlalocTemporal]

@@pvic6959 -- It could be a combination of items allows a circle of multipliers that explodes to infinity in one roll. It could be some div by zero glitch or other NaN shenanigans. It could be cheese with getting negative 1 in the first few rolls to make the count rollover to the maximum. Or it could be possible to max out the count with normal play.

[@pvic6959]

@@TlalocTemporal ah yes that could work! but as for maxing out, it seems like they just add 0s if needed. once you get to the integer limit, they stop counting the least significant numbers

[@TlalocTemporal]

@@pvic6959 -- I'm not particularly familiar with data types, but it seems like some weird half implementation of floats.

[@Icanttstop]

The craziest run ive seen so far was like 6 breeder dice with the all faces reroll 6 times and all the runs passives. Hit like 200 dice, and 10 trillion points

[@drcgaming4195]

i feel like adding a weight onto the luck thing or the slot machine lottery thing would both be insane. 100% chance to get the 777 after hwever many rolls it was would be insane

[@thebigl321]

I don't think the clover permanently adds to the chance of a lottery face paying out, each clover increases the chance of a lottery paying out on that single roll by 1/2 the original chance per clover rolled. If it did, his 1% of 77777 would have been up to 100% with just that single clover being rolled about two hundred times.

[@mushryhuns1795]

really enjoying this game! i always end up on your channel around midnight, so such a chill, purely you and the strategy game is very nice. this and the alchemy are always great to see pop up

[@literallyjustapanda1068]

So, im a huge math nerd, and writing out all of your results, and graphing the total / average roll tickles a part of my brain that i havent had in years, please please please keep doing these

[@shadowflamelightburst4503]

I’m so sad, I got a great run and my game crashed at 250 rolls left with me having gained 250 billion in one roll ;-;

[@marteater19zz]

F o7

[@nihiluna]

Just curious, is there a wiki or anywhere to check how mechanics work? I've been struggling to fully grasp how some of the combos/synergies work and it's really hard to find information online because of the title of the game.

[@shadowflamelightburst4503]

Yeah I see a lot of if you have less than 6 dice abilities and wonder if they truly mean less than 6 or less than/equal to 6

[@xTheRadioStar]

@@shadowflamelightburst4503 Pretty sure it's strictly less than 6. You can always turn on the analytics mode to see what bonuses are being applied to each die when it rolls.

[@shirothefish9688]

The wording in the game is very literal.if it says less than 6 you need at most 5 die. If it talks about a numeric face, only faces with an explicit number or pips will work (I've yet to test lottery die though)

[@gamewarrior348]

Not that I’ve been able to find. I don’t even think there is a subreddit

[@xraidev]

@@shirothefish9688 lottery is not a numeric, only faces 1-99 are considered “numeric” I’m working on clearing these up though!

[@bobjhon7391]

“Let the big get bigger and just ignore the rest” - US tax laws rn

[@whydontyouhandledeez]

I wish. Instead of ignoring me they are taking a fourth of my money between income and sales tax. Makes you wonder why we ever overthrew the British.

[@captainclawlie239]

@@whydontyouhandledeez so that we could have dentisty and breakfast other than beans and toast

[@whydontyouhandledeez]

@@captainclawlie239 Alas, if only I could afford dental insurance.

[@XxVelocityxshot51xX]

13:45 brooo, that is one of the few things your niche content provides. we dont need to only see the insane runs, i like seeing you clue out the math and make strategies for the next time and stuff.

[@jamesmccaffrey9042]

Picked up this game when I saw you play it. I'm hooked

[@naisuyi]

Same, I'm even in the video, number 27. on the leaderboard :d

[@sjoerdglaser2794]

I played this game today after I saw your previous vid. It is really fun! I've 40 gotten trillion. My solution is to try to stack as many multipliers on top of each other as possible. Many passive effects give multipliers for every dice roll. I gained my biggest scores with the 'previous role time X die' (it has an arrow on it). If you put that on a die with many multiple face multipliers and add lots of passive multiplier effect you can gain insane scores! I also really enjoy adding rerolls to important dice. But for that to be usefull, you have to add a lot of bonusses on one die.

[@shadowflamelightburst4503]

I really love the top 3 passive mixed with passives that only work when you have less than 6 total dice, and this setup you have can more or less be made at less than 6 dice

[@grantdixon36]

I think that is the optimal strategy, my 5 dice runs are always my best

[@shadowflamelightburst4503]

@@grantdixon36 I had a great run that crashed and lost all progress that would’ve landed me top 20 at least

[@comphy22]

I got 101 on the leaderboard with the Top 3 passive and the Wild Adjacency passive early on. The other thing I had that was missing from your build was the face that multiplies the previous roll of its die (I forget what it's called but it looks like a white arrow in a black circle with a multiplier next to it, you can see one at 36:57). Those really break the game with exponential growth

[@sirex7498]

this game is actually so much more in depth and interesting than i expected

[@BadDrummerCarl]

I think the issue I have with games like Luck Be A Landlord and Roll is that they seem that 10 years ago they'd be released as a free flash game. While they're better developed and have updates which is where they are worth the value, as a standard premise I feel like these games aren't groundbreaking

[@TlalocTemporal]

Groundbreaking isn't necessary to have a fun or successful game. Lots of successful games are basically identical to last years version. * cough cough Madden F1 CoD cough * Erhm... And plenty of fun games are just good implementations of tried and true ideas.

[@laeman7774]

i just finished watching your other one and thought "hopefully he has more than one episode"

[@pvic6959]

same I want more than 5 :P

[@dylanjohnson254]

a 40 minute video is just what i needed right now🤝

[@altituderaven3889]

A good build you should try is do 5 buy any dice (only get the ones from shop upgrade so 5 total allowing you to make use of less than 6 dice passives), get every as many die faces to 10 as possible (stacks with multiple of 2 passives, multiple of 5 passives, no 99 passives, and less than 13 passives on top of this yahtzees are amazing), and also ignoring single face multipliers which allows you to get the passive that multiply the value of all numbers by x amount but makes non number die useless. Also you should get the reroll upgrades that add 3 rerolls to a die of your choice which then allows that die to roll 3 times for the cost of 1 roll. Also if you do try this build don't get weights because this allows you to get the no weight passive as well. You likely won't be able to get everything but this is essentially a God run. Just when you get 10 on a die early get leave that face alone and make the other faces as big as possible until you start getting some passives rolling then get the upgrade that makes every face of a die the same and those big number become the 10 that is the piggest number that works with the ×2, ×5, and >13 passives

[@shirothefish9688]

God i can't wait until he learns more of this game. Side note i don't think it's the most efficient to have a bunch of die that are only good 1/6 of the time. Better to have less dice that are useful half or more of the time. Least that's my experience

[@maxevans5611]

when all his good rolls have weights on it its clearly favouring having many dices with few good faces. But its tough. also as an example lets say he has a dice full of 99's and then 9 extra dice full of ones. if you could only change 9 faces to even a 2 pip face it is still always better to put it on different dice, as the first change increases its average the most kind of. its weird and id say dont fuss too much, the game having stuff like sticky and reroll and weight makes it tough to put to peak efficiency without being as boring as molasses

[@Demaculus]

That's my experience top 100 run with only 9 die.

[@NStripleseven]

You know what, it’s a good game, but it has no sense of urgency, no difficulty really. If there were something like the rent in LBaL, it would add this need to move at a certain pace in order to not lose, which would make the game more interesting in my opinion.

[@Aliensrock]

Hard agree, though I also don't mind setting hard goals for myself and making that the challenge for the time being. Trillion point run anyone?

[@melting_gaming4773]

@@Aliensrock Trillion seems like you would need some really good rng, but if you want to do it I’ll gladly watch it!

[@andrewqi6695]

@@Aliensrock There was a person who got a 5 trillion point run a few months back, so it's definitely possible.

[@vAmmonite]

@@Aliensrock someone did a 7 trillion run

[@plebobliterator]

one of the selling points of this game is a relaxing experience and adding a goal you are required to reach isn’t very relaxing to most.

[@bananavapor8063]

Me: Please realize that duplicating wild is just worse than duping your main dice Tyler: Duplicates wild Me: *mild frustration*

[@NichDevRumble]

Dev of this game i love the simplicity and addictivness of this good job ik you are here man.

[@1JTGaming]

6:05 "it's still really good when you hit the nuts like that" - Aliensrock 2021

[@ricewind1]

Downloaded this game yesterday because of your videos - managed to place 98th on the leaderboard today :)

[@amundamund]

Got a 16 digit score today with 5 dice. Ended on 15th place. Strategy is face multipliers and reroll multipliers in the middle die and numbers on the one to the left or right. You want the numbers to be

[@cinnamonjam9173]

if you place an "add multiplier" on another "add multiplier", the multipliers will add together normally. if you use any multiplier on a "face multiplier" normally, a "face multiplier" will not stack with any other multiplier. with the item you purchased, if you place an "add multiplier" on a "face multiplier", they stack. or if you place any other type of multiplier on top of a current "face multiplier", they will also stack.

[@cinnamonjam9173]

the "attached multiplier stack" does something similar, "face multipliers" now take into consideration the x10 from your 99x10 face, where before a "face multiplier" will only consider the 99 value, and after it will consider the 99*10 value

[@hellbowe.]

If you place multiplier (x10) on a numeric dice(99), it will not be affected by face multipliers (▣x10). it will be like 990+990. BUT If you place multiplier (x10) on a face multiplier (▣x10), it will be x100 out of best die (99) equals 9900. I really want Tyler to read this.

[@xTheRadioStar]

That's only if you have the passive (which he bought this run)

[@HORTN8R]

When u only understand about 50% of whats going on and still enjoy the video, u know the youtuber is god tier

[@HORTN8R]

A yo how am i just finding out u can still read comments with ur phone sideways

[@Sea_bear_42]

@@HORTN8R I think it was added in an update like a week ago or sum

[@Oxygen1004]

@@HORTN8R tbh I kinda wish it was something you could toggle bc I have comments up all the time and I keep having to close them when I go full screen

[@zaxtonhong3958]

You might say he’s On a roll

[@wingedfish1175]

I'm not judging because it Was confusing as hell but it hurt when he misunderstood the combine multiplier upgrade

[@appolleros1597]

I’m pretty sure the like multiplier stack thing literally was “all multipliers now stack up to x99” like it not longer takes the highest multiplier it takes them all at once, so that 990 could get a like x5

[@Jedib87]

Your last video on this game made me reinstall steam just to buy it, love this game

[@APerson-14]

That person who got 5 trillion points and gets 1 billion: *failed run*

[@NStripleseven]

lol

[@iantaakalla8180]

I mean, when you have gotten 5 trillion a billion really is not much, either literally or logarithmically like how we expect stuff to be.

[@dasancostandi3161]

I instantly bought the game after your first video! It’s seriously addicting and amazing that a dev combined the best of deck building and “cookie clicker” style games. I managed to get around 1.2M in my first run and broke 100B in the second by abusing dice adders, a stack of passive multipliers, and the perk that allows all single face multipliers to apply to dice # multipliers. I think it needs some rebalancing though… seems that only a few strategies are viable, especially since the shop scales up in cost so darn fast!

[@xraidev]

I am constantly working on balance! Please leave any balance suggestions in the game forums on Steam so I can better know what needs buffed/nerfed!

[@Lavoye]

Go in the options and turn on "Analitics". When that's on, after a roll, you put your cursor on a die to see all the meanings behing what it did. Helps understand certain concepts.

[@rendomstranger8698]

Just so you know, shop prices are based on total earnings. Because of this, you want to go for the big multipliers as early as possible. From what I've seen, don't even bother buying anything from the level 1 shop and refresh the store as much as possible. Also, safe up for a few refreshes before buying anything that makes you score snowball so shop prices stay low.

[@bumiy1]

I love the longer vids and I love this game!!!!

[@itsnottylor4011]

Bruh The ×2 and the ×3 die are the same type of multiplier. They are both the type that multiplies your total roll. The part where you were trying to figure out where to put the ×3 was tearing me apart

[@EmberBlaze99]

I feel like an adjacency reroller with lottery combo could be an interesting combo. Add some clovers and glue and it could be highly lucrative

[@briancsobor7476]

Would love to see more of this game

[@chickentim8505]

Love your videos! Keep up the good work!

[@littlelunastra878]

Aliensrock has made me fall in love with random indie games.

[@RoderickEtheria]

The key to winning is to upgrade your shop quickly to unlock the passives.

[@hados1853]

Something you should try is to get the biggest single roll score possible. So you play through all of your rolls and spend all your points how you choose, then whatever you get on your last roll is your score

[@nataliesantiago7964]

I was happy that my first round of roll was better than Tyler's first, and now my best is 300 mil.... Now he's shooting for 1 bil. It was good while it lasted Edit: lol just got 9 bil as a high score, and am at 274 on the leaderboards

[@georgestweeter]

Im only at 7:15, so idk if you do this later. But in my playing i found the 6 side reroll×2 to be very very good. Just excessive rerolls to be good, as the dice get rolled 1-3 extra times, and all of thise rerolls get added to the current roll. Example, i had a die with 5 99s and 1 die breeder, ×2reroll on every face, and ×4 or ×5 on every 99, and then on all 4 adjacent sides i had dice with weighted faces for rerolling adjacent dice.

[@angelthomas7925]

Love watching the misunderstandings of rules in this tho

[@LiterallySoup]

My understanding is that having a single face multiplier multiply a face with a multiplier already on it isn't useless. A single face multiplier ignores the multiplier on the face it applies to, but it also puts the value it gets on the die with the single face multiplier, meaning the multiplier will still apply to the face with the big number and its effects would not be negated by the single face multiplier. For example, if you had a 99 with a X10 multiplier that would be worth 990. If you had a 99 without a multiplier but also had a different face with a X10 single face multiplier, that would be worth 99 from the face + 990 from the single face multiplier. A X10 single face multiplier and a face worth 99 with a X10 multiplier would be worth 990+990. This was badly worded, but the important thing is that having a multiplier on your big number and a different single face multiplier is still good.

[@LiterallySoup]

When I say multiplier what I mean is face multiplier

[@hammer_ttk]

I can confirm that yes, the top scores all hit the integer limit, or rather the long limit.longs are stored in 4 bytes, or 32 bits, which gives them the ability to represent numbers between -2,147,483,648 and 2,147,483,647. Looking familiar? I assume that they did some trickery, storing only the first 7 digits and tacking on zeroes to the end, giving them the ability to store numbers technically too large to fit into a long. what i don't understand though is why they limited themselves to only 8 digits in the rear?! With that trick,they could increase the displayed value by over 700 million orders of magnitude. If I'm missing something totally obvious here, please let me know

[@gmoney6935]

I can't wait to see what they will add in future updates!

[@georgestweeter]

I got this game after your first video. My first game i got ~5.2mil. Havent had time to play it since. But i did find some of the item descriptions confusing, so i ended up wasting a few purchases.

[@tomp6762]

Try the dice breeder adder, its hilarious. It spawns dice that spawn more dice, and it stacks with rerollers. By the end, I had several hundred dice. I had to grind the shop for it, however.

[@reee2754]

these are really fun to watch

[@mr-glitch1566]

I love these kind of videos can you do more?(please?)

[@JediJess1]

Enjoying your videos. impressive games. I even ended up buying some of them on steam to play myself, and I'm now considering this one. Just a heads up though, "Dice" is the plural. You have either one "die" or many "dice". Hope to see you get another Personal Best

[@CliveAtFive]

Dang! This is absolutely a blessed run.

[@NoHeros247]

I am so happy you decided to play this game again ^.^ I was bummed when you said it might be a one and done.

[@SendyTheEndless]

I used to play Cookie Clicker and then felt bad for wasting my time... this is very relaxing to play and quite fun too.

[@toast99bubbles]

Glue on the lottery and/or 4 leaf clover would have been a good strat. EDIT: If you went for the +800% to the lottery stuff too, that would have been crazy powerful of a strat.

[@cn-ml]

You could have used the "Set all die faces" to make your 10x multiplier dice multiply on every die roll

[@dougdaddy732]

Just bought the game because of this video... gotta say its worth every penny. Especially if you like games that involve thinking or math, its only 5$ for alot of enjoyment 10/10 game

[@shalimarlake7852]

I wish you had weighted / put the x10 multiplier on some of the face multipliers. I definitely think that's the way to go.

[@prich0382]

77777 lottery reminds me of that thing chat users send to streamers, xQc was one of those and it would puss him off so much sometimes

[@kalialiah346]

So I was confused in the difference between 13:15 's result and 13:25 's result. So you start at 28 and then it goes to 1,441 so removing the previous amount gets us 1,413. The only way this number is achievable with the current rolls, 10, 17(just changed from 15), 99×10, and a x4, is if you take the numerics and add the smallest first and then take the multipliers and add them together and then multiply them with the 99 So 10+17=27 1413-27=1,386 X10+X4=X14 99 x 14 =1,386 Next it goes from 1,441 to 4,136 4,136-1,441= 2,695 To get 2,695 you have the 5 rolls of 99x10, x10, x2, x5, 18(just changed from 17), and 5. If you assume the same order as last time then you have 18+5=23 2,695-23=2,672 X10 +X2 +X5 +X10=X27 99 x27 = 2,673 1 more than it should but if we take into account the change of 18 from 17 and go down by one then its 22 for the total value of the lower faces and therefore 2,673. What I don't get is why this version applies the before incrementation number instead of the after like the previous situation. Now this makes sense if you do it another way where you separate 99x10, and 5 as their own things and consider the next highest number 17(changing to 18) as the one that will be multiplied but before it can increment. Like this. 17x2 x5 x10 =1,700 2,695-1,700=995 995=990+5 990=99x10 The fact that it resolves it self if you used a separate calculation order so as to make sense of the mis-application of the rules, is extremely worrying so much so that I begin to wonder if the results are just in and of themselves a arbitrary roll of the dice. Instead of a consistent set of rules that are followed the same way to a T no matter the situation as simple math and therefore computational logic should be.

[@ipkandskill]

i hope you put out some more of this game, it's pretty interesting. kinda seems an ideal game for mods.

[@sunnymaster6968]

“That’s insane and really cheap” says Tyler on the most expensive shop item

[@chookennooget]

Thank you I love your videos especially the roll videos i loved the first 1

[@noahstevenmeyer]

There is a setting that lets you see the math behind each die and how much it’s worth

[@michaelklein2129]

I think the clover dice must be on the same dice as the lottery it is affecting. I never noticed the lottery odds going up.

[@Frank_DS]

Edit: ignore this comment, aliensrock figured it out ^^ You can turn on analytic mode in the settings, when hovering over for example a multiplier it will show you which number is being multiplied for example 71 x 4

[@danisob3633]

there should be a speedrun category for certain score milestones. maybe there is. im lazy to check

[@quentincosic8687]

Every time you reroll the shop, everything becomes more expensive.

[@polill00]

Looks like shop prices are based off of your current income, and those only reset after refreshing the shop. It might be beneficial to get the cheapest prices for the most upgrades if you fully buy out a shop.

[@sagoot]

the rigged machine is amazing if you have a high% and 1% lottery on the same dye

[@danielyuan9862]

Oh that is smart why didn't I think of that lol.

[@AlphaSquadZero]

Curious that the high scores would use integers if the developer is just going to be rounding the values instead of using n-precision floating-point numbers.

[@victor_e_dafeet8218]

Can weights stack? Like cuz adding a weights don’t seem to always guarantee, so wasn’t sure if that would be a good investment to make sure the faces you roll are the ones you want

[@grantdixon36]

Weights can’t stack, but if you have a reroll passive and glue on your weighted die you will almost always hit it

[@MaskMcGee]

Maybe it was a glitch, but I got my 'reduce shop prices by 80%" die with about 1400 rolls to go. You've fallen into the trap, dice values are basically worthless, the number of dies times x is killer. You want as many dice as possible.

[@dirtinator]

I would gladly watch a stream were you are trying to go for a bigger goal!

[@lonelyPorterCH]

Thats a huge improvement^^

[@Banana8D910]

Make another one soon! I LOVE THIS! :) also do you know when you would do more baba is you

[@Silentsouls]

FYI tab is the same as clicking on the dot

[@nickbeckstead6618]

more of this please

[@TheRealPress_Start]

Imagine a channel where they only play Roll.

[@GothicLordUK]

39:19 that's me in 60th place!!!

[@altituderaven3889]

Glad to know I'm still 33 on the leaderboard FYI the top whatever that all have the same number are hacked

[@ButRedman]

Seeing as the copied die also copies any upgrades it had, wouldn't it have made more sense to multiply the 99 die? That would make massive points

[@GimX3]

But hey, that was 2 million in the blink of an google phone. *hm yes, perfect*

[@i_schrott]

Please more of thise game!

[@ColePenner]

Take a drink every time Tyler says this is insane or that’s so good

[@hezecut7342]

YESSS! I WAS HOPING FOR THIS GAME AGAIN!