This is so incredibly valuable to those of us who will likely never be able to visit this stone, much less have a subject matter expert like Prof. Williams join us to explain in detail every cut made into it. Thank you for this.
@GustavSvard2 жыл бұрын
I've been to the Rök stone, and live in the runestone-densest area of the world (greater Stockholm), and I heartily agree on this being a very valuable video. Thank you to both Jackson & Henrik!
@aggemcquack97262 жыл бұрын
The preschool I went to is located across the street from the rök stone, even though I was young I remember the feeling the texture of the stone ( it was oddly smooth )
@nicolajlund2781 Жыл бұрын
@@GustavSvard
@listonheinz91033 ай бұрын
I was at the Rök stone as a kid in 1988, my dad took a picture of me and my brother which I still have! I was there again just a couple of years ago and photographed my own kids at the same spot almost 35 years later…
@Sviareik Жыл бұрын
As a swedish person, listening to Henrik going through this over a thousand year old ancient runic inscription from my ancestors depicting history and the norse spirituality and beliefs sends chills down my spine. Thank you Crawford and Williams for this enlightening content!
@cerdic6305 Жыл бұрын
To be fair, if the people who wrote this still have descendants then they are probably the ancestors of most currently living humans
@ur-inannak9565 Жыл бұрын
@@cerdic6305 Not enough time depth for the whole world, though very likely all of Europe. Of course the OP probably had more than just the guys carving the runes in mind.
@asburycollins91823 ай бұрын
@@cerdic6305 ofc they do. Royal genealogies go this far back aswell. Bot uncommon
@mabs5032 жыл бұрын
Tack så mycket! Det var väldigt intressant att få djupare insikt i vad riksklenoden Rökstenen betyder. Tack Henrik och tack Jackson.
@maggan822 жыл бұрын
Note the clip differs from the established interpretation found on the Riksantikvariet's sign at the Rökstenen: The segment raiþiaurikʀ hin þurmuþi has in previous interpretations been read as rēð Þiōðrīkʀ hinn þurmōði with the meaning 'then Tjodrik the bold ruled'. Tjodrik has been assumed to be the Gothic king Theoderic the Great. In Bo Ralph's evaluation of Rökstenen's text from 2007, the segment is instead interpreted as rēð iau rinkʀ hinn þurmōði with the meaning 'rode on the horse the huge warrior'. Inspired by Bo Ralph's interpretation, including that it is not about Teoderik at all, but a warrior on horseback and that the inscription consists of riddles, the linguist Per Holmberg put together an interdisciplinary group consisting of himself, the rune researcher Henrik Williams, the religious scholar Olof Sundqvist, the archaeologist Bo Grass grove. In January 2020, they presented the result, that the text consists of nine riddles, where four have the answer Odin and five have the answer Sun. The riddles are about Ragnarök, and they suggest that it may be a spell or a call to battle when it comes. They believe that the riddles refer to a strong climate deviation five hundred years earlier (nine generations according to the interpretation) which Gräslund previously connected with the fimbul winter that precedes Ragnarök.
@JakeDoubleyoo2 жыл бұрын
If Dr Williams's interpretation is on-point, it would pretty much confirm that the post-Ragnarok rebirth was part of pagan tradition and not a product of later christianization. Super neat.
@jonathanryals99342 жыл бұрын
If you are on a horse you can see the top.
@TzOn792 жыл бұрын
The horses we had in Sweden was very small thou.
@idkkdi86202 жыл бұрын
Did we even ride horses that much?
@varangjar15442 жыл бұрын
Or wooden stool..?
@TzOn79 Жыл бұрын
@@GratDuForloradeArgumentet just read what the scientist say, im born and raised in Sweden and know my history. The Viking hade small horses.
@who5729 Жыл бұрын
Maybe that was around the time where they started to breed them taller? There probably dates and stuff to check that
@katepalmer7472 жыл бұрын
Dr. Williams' interpretation of the Rök stone is Insightful and convincing. Thank you so much 🌷
@ChristofferOrrmalmUtsi2 жыл бұрын
It is factual yes. /Lived under that era too
@rogerolovsson64392 жыл бұрын
Well i agree most with the explanation that format historia give to this stone and other professors that give a more logic explanation on what is written on the stone too. But i must say im not a expert in the futhark so i can only go after what my logic leads me when listen to different people make their explanationon the runes. My english is not perfect so i hope this make any sense what i try to say in words here.
@Braapncamp Жыл бұрын
Thanks Craford and Henrik for this episode, i was standing infront of Rökstenen for the second time this summer with a Norwegian friend (Tjommi). Very impressive and remarkable cultural remain from our ancestors and Henriks interpretation is also very impressive and makes sense. Thanks to all of You who works with this to get us a better understanding. /Mattias
@Lorehouse2 жыл бұрын
A captivating topic. Riddles and secrets seem to be an intrinsic part of the Germanic written tradition, which makes its study all the more interesting. Thank you for sharing.
@heges16062 жыл бұрын
Tusen takk,dr.Crawford,for at du år etter år prøver å tette mine kunnskapshull😊Er glad for at jeg kan være med på å gi deg en liten påskjønnelse tilbake….
@alinapopescu8729 ай бұрын
Many thanks to our exceptional guide, Dr. Williams. Your kindness is much appreciated.
@阳明子2 жыл бұрын
Dr. Henrik Williams is so intelligent and eloquent. Thank you for this video!!
@bjarnitryggvason78662 жыл бұрын
Man, what a great lecture. 👍
@General_Popo2 жыл бұрын
Ancient Scandinavian: "Oh, nice rock... Imma write some absolute fire on it!"
@pyrothem2 жыл бұрын
Incredible. Thank you for all the hard work you went through to let us all find out more about this.
@danneeddi19952 жыл бұрын
I actually live an hour away from Rök, was there this summer. Really cool piece of history! There are many old norse and older carvings around this area.
@magisterhermonius3 ай бұрын
I just visited this stone last week. My favourite runic inscription of all time! An interesting and fresh interpretation by prof. Williams (reading his book at the moment) although the stone is cloaked in mysticism still I feel.
@ivanradstrom99392 жыл бұрын
Cool to see you coming to Sweden and visiting Rökstenen. I live not too far from it and remember clearly when my school class went to see it back in elementary school. Have not been back since then but would love to go back again. Östergötland (the cultural and historical region) where Rökstenen is has many other locations and old scriptures and such, dating back to the iron age.
@stefansoder69032 жыл бұрын
Driven past it so many times and never bothered to stop and have o look. Next I will! Thank you Henrik and Jackson.
@OriginalPuro4 ай бұрын
How can you even live in Scandinavia without being amazed by our ancient culture? Skam deg. Tilbake til Vikingtiden vi skal! :D
@stefansoder69034 ай бұрын
@@OriginalPuro I AM AMAZED! Seen it now a month ago!
@rationsofrationality25102 жыл бұрын
what an amazing video. you can tell this guy both knows what he's talking about and loves to talk about it. and great job to Jackson for letting him speak uninterrupted. all around interesting and informative!
@robertahlen41992 жыл бұрын
I noticed this as well - a time to every purpose…a time to speak and a time to listen.
@addealmen2 жыл бұрын
This is amazing. I grew up approx 40 km from Rökstenen and went there many many times with my grandparents in the late 70’s early 80’s. Who could think I would Watch a video about it +40 years later explaining what was a total enigma to us back then :-)
@Crecganford2 жыл бұрын
Fascinating
@hannayoung96572 жыл бұрын
When I was little and visit Rökstenen, it was said to be random runes with no meaning... So much has change in 40 years.
@matthewlawrenson27342 жыл бұрын
Thank you Dr Henrik, what an exciting animated, ceremonial puzzle...a myth-journey around a 5 sided monolith. A veritable written ritual performance in the text-ure of rock itself.. I thought rubics cubes were tricky. There should be more cyphers and stories on gravestones then your children would conceivable turn up to work out the puzzles....Mmmmmm
@PeterJessenDK2 жыл бұрын
This enigmatic stone always remind me of how deep our forefathers were. And now that you were there, it would only be a 5 hour ride by train or car to Hleiðra/Lejre, the seat of Danish kings since ca. year 500 and the probable scene of the Beowulf Drape. There could be some very intriguing parallels between the apocalyptic theme on the Rök stone and the Grendel monster in Beowulf. Could that be a metamorphosis of the Fenris Wulf and maybe the 536 cataclysm? And from Lejre it's just a couple of hours to Jelling, one of the two gigantic gigantic monuments devoted to the Asa worship.
@Ca11mero2 жыл бұрын
That's a very interesting point. Simply that different areas/cultures (depending on location) made up their own stories upon the visions of the cataclysm. And in combination with their believes and fantasy they created a new tale, with new characters, inspired by what they already have knowledge of. More or less a metamorphosis, just like you said.
@Deodrix2 жыл бұрын
Also interesting how it flips from one to twelve as statements said to Odin. After speaking about Day/night, I'd also say year but were there even 12 months in Old Norse cosmology/time keeping at the time? And to be fair I'm ignorant if time was even measured in a day by 24 hours then. In any case an interesting structure for the messages.
@gadpivs2 жыл бұрын
The Ostrogoths being mentioned also lines up with the fact that there are place names in the region of Gotaland for both the Visigoths and Ostrogoths, with the name Gautigoths also cited by Jordanes, another name for the Geats of Beowulf. So it is likely that Beowulf himself, as a Geat, was a kind of Goth.
@maggan822 жыл бұрын
They called thenselves Götar and still does, Geat is the anglified version and Goth originally latin.
@lornalong64682 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much & also to Prof Williams for this wonderful understanding & broader historical context that this runestone illuminates in Norse history & mythology. It is interesting to see again in ancient religions & belief systems the concepts of self-sacrifice, afterlife, a final struggle and ultimately a hope for a meaningful end to life & eternal purpose after life. Wonderful stuff.
@Holly-ro3yq2 жыл бұрын
Very informative and interesting. Thank you very much!
@netaen2 жыл бұрын
Runestones are truly fascinating. My wife and always try to look up stones when traveling in Sweden. I have a friend in Israel who is fond of runes to say the least. The Rök stone stands not to far from my place of birth!
@authormichellefranklin2 жыл бұрын
Fantastic 😍 Thank you for the in-depth look!
@ailenepace8262 Жыл бұрын
Very good. I really enjoyed listening to this man. He is very knowledgeable Bruce Howard, MG.
@Fujihoffmann2 жыл бұрын
I grew up in the region, so I have been to the Rök stone sk many times. After this video I wanna go there again :)
@tommygigg35002 жыл бұрын
21:07 They're all named after the oldest brother. So like the Mario Brothers. Got it.
@sarahmcgregor60062 жыл бұрын
Or George Foreman the boxer! Named all his sons George too!!
@baskoning98962 жыл бұрын
Some questions I have by just looking at the stone: Why are the lines not spaced out evenly? Since carving runes would be a daunting task, would it not be relatively easy to have straighter and more evenly spaced out lines? Why is one line broken? The second line from the left has a gap in it? What does that mean? My major question is this: if the left bottom corner has a piece broken off, that took some letters, how come the bottom line has letters starting inside the broken piece: while the line above it is gone? Was it restored at an earlier age, perhaps very early?
@fugithegreat Жыл бұрын
I was watching this and thinking that I could read a whole book about this stone! Can't wait for the English version to come available.
@ONLINESWEDISHCOURSE2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this great video. I have Professor William's book in my collection. I had honor to have it signed by him in one of seminars in Uppsala.
@getstarted71682 жыл бұрын
Östergötland, Crawford hope you saw Omberg and Hjässan, the views over Vättern. Dr Henrik, proffsig.
@watcherofthewest8597 Жыл бұрын
Great stuf! Thank you. What a magnificent piece of history and culture. And a beautiful valley in the background!
@flickerbasob66962 жыл бұрын
Incredible stuff!!
@lhulugren53092 жыл бұрын
There is a better interpretation of the run text at the YT site ”Format historia”. According to this the Rök stone is a legal document for administration of the early Sweden and especially the county Östergötland. I believe this is more correct. Unfortunetly this is only in Swedish.
@viktorgruvegard13437 ай бұрын
Vet att jag är sent ute med detta. Men varför anser du den tolkningen som "bättre"? Alla Format Historia videor om rökstenen klagar jämt på klimat aspekten av Henriks tolkning. Hela hans kanal ryker av bitterhet (pun intended). Tycker Henriks förklaring av "þór" som "våga/kamp" är mer trolig än av att stenen slumpmässigt nämner Tor.
@gamergirlmars Жыл бұрын
This is so cool to actually see this stone! You always hear of them but to see it really is perplexing and intriguing! :D
@Pompelipom332 жыл бұрын
Very interesting! Thanks Henrik for a very interesting reading of the stone!
@emom358 Жыл бұрын
Wonderful! Thank you both.
@gerardvila46852 жыл бұрын
This is deeply fascinating, but I got confused - when is he talking about the SON and when is he talking about the SUN? If I understand correctly: It's the SUN gets eaten by Fenris Wolf (eclipsed) but whose daughter lights up Gimli the new paradise. It's the SON who dies in battle and is taken to Valhalla.
@troelspeterroland69982 жыл бұрын
I'm confused as well. I will have to rewatch the video. So annoying that they are homophones in English.
@awetaiwan2 жыл бұрын
wonderful video Henrik and Jackson!
@championgoatherd2 жыл бұрын
Wow! This was truly awesome!
@ManuelPerezUS2 жыл бұрын
This was amazing; thank you for sharing this moment with us.
@iwantlee95102 жыл бұрын
It’s weird that these stones are such a rarity. We translated these in primary school, visited them on school trips, and I could even see one looking out of my window while growing up. To me these rune stones aren’t rare, but to non-Scandinavians I guess they are.
@coranova2 жыл бұрын
This was wonderful, thank you for your time!
@woofisfloppis11252 жыл бұрын
Really interesting! I'm fairly sure I saw you filming this when I drove by! Tack så mycket för denna inblick!
@drakekay65772 жыл бұрын
18:19 The pillars were lined up in a row. One side is the low half, the other side is the high half. I would say 1 through 10, and 11 through 20.
@zmudilago2 жыл бұрын
I live 2 km from th Rök-stone. It is truly an amazing piece of history and mythology.
@elixexo40112 жыл бұрын
8:20 Interesting, the Japanese have a similar story about the sun going into hiding, could it be the same event?
@Movetheproduct2 жыл бұрын
What and when is that Japanese story? really interested :)
@elixexo40112 жыл бұрын
@@Movetheproduct It's the story of Amatarasu the sun goddess (8th century in the "Kojiki" and "Nihon Shoki"), the story goes that Susano the god of storms was playing around in heaven and accidentally destroyed some of Amatarasu's things. Saddened she hid in her room and withheld her light from the world. For this Susano was cast down to the earth for a time.
@Bjowolf22 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: Many Vikings got severe neck and back pains, while trying to read all these rune stones 😂
@NiclasAsp2 жыл бұрын
yes I actually think that you are right
@uncle_moose2 жыл бұрын
Yes, thank god we have books now
@ChristofferOrrmalmUtsi2 жыл бұрын
Only reading? Probably the least exhausting thing to do, not even writing them or drawing images could not have been as severe as cutting them out or even getting them out of the soil, let alone to transport them to where they was heading to loot, burn religious buildings or settle down and trading with wares or something else of some value.
@uncle_moose2 жыл бұрын
@@ChristofferOrrmalmUtsi the vikingseceetary had it's work cut out for him.
@roarprawn2 жыл бұрын
Awesome video. Thank you Dr Crawford, and Prof Williams :)
@VanaheimrUllr2 жыл бұрын
Great videos lately sir, love the actualt sight-seeing approach. Fun with the slightly confused younger/elder futhark-inscription, treasure! Thank you!
@eherlitz2 жыл бұрын
Holy moly, I live nearby Rökstenen, fantastic place, hope you enjoyed your stay.
@gabrielprado2659 Жыл бұрын
Thank you Dr Jackson
@nonamenola332 жыл бұрын
I live pretty close by and every time we have relatives or friends visiting we go to places like Omberg, Vadstena, Alvastra and, of course, Rökstenen (and so on, there are many places to visit, depending on your interests). Edit: I forgot, this was a really interesting video!
@thedamnyankee12 жыл бұрын
You had an interesting trip to Northern Europe. some work, some play, some kettlebells.
@olivere.2352 жыл бұрын
They keep on coming! Love your videos. Have you read Harald Bjorvands and Fredrik Otto Lindemans Våre arveord? It deserves a video of its own!
@pw58032 жыл бұрын
Mycket intressant, very interesting. Love these explanations of what these stones actually says. Thank you.
@Ehzkaton Жыл бұрын
The discussion at ~40:05 could also be interpreted in terms of the climate crisis of 536. Because of the excess aerosol in the atmosphere, a lunar eclipse will not be as red, even becoming grey or disappearing all together. So the "wolf doesn't redden" could be referring to the lack of red color in a lunar eclipse, as Dr.Henrik Williams points out the next line about "lady in waters of the holy" is likely in reference to the Sun or Moon. So one possible interpretation is that the wolf doesn't make the moon red when the Sun is reborn, which might make sense because of how lunar eclipses would have appeared when the Sun disappeared / came back.
@carlsefni2 жыл бұрын
I suppose it will inevitably sound churlish if I say that I am not _really_ on board with the interpretation of the Rök inscription given here (or as published in the paper in "Futhark" from Williams and others in 2019), but I should emphasize that although I have issues with this _particular_ argument, in general I hold the work of Henrik Williams and his colleagues in the highest respect. 👍
@sailonstellarwinds2 жыл бұрын
Disagreeing is always allowed, this is science.
@carlsefni2 жыл бұрын
For what it is worth, here is a post on the 2019 Rök article I put on Facebook back when the article had first been published. I hope it shows that I'm open the re-interpretations, though I'm still fully on board with this one: It’s interesting [the article's argument], but I’m having trouble being convinced. There really seem to be several things going on in the article: it wants to link the “536 AD climate event” to the author’s interpretation of the early 9th-century Rök inscription. Firstly, the authors want to emphasize that the “536 AD climate event” had a significant impact on contemporary Scandinavian economics and society, and hence culture - and I think many are sympathetic to this understanding. They also want it to be understood that the effects of the “536 event” had a long afterlife in Scandinavian culture, still present even in the apocalyptic Ragnarök mythology of the Viking Age as reflected in medieval Icelandic sources. This is not entirely unreasonable, but it has to be fairly speculative, given the relative lack of earlier written (or comparative) sources. Then, the authors have a particular interpretation of the Rök stone, which is essentially that the father Varinn wishes to place the untimely death of his son VāmōðR in the context of the Norse myth of Ragnarök. This is not unreasonable; it reminds me of Joe Harris’s arguments that the death of Varinn is being placed in the context of a Baldr-type myth. However, I feel like their argument glosses very rapidly over some of the complicated philological problems of the inscription. To pick just one example, they accept Nordenstreng’s 1912 reading of “sakumukmini” as “Sagum Ygg minni”, noting that this is not “the standard linguistic interpretation” but not really providing an argument in support of their preferred “alternative” linguistic interpretation. I kind of feel like I want to see that argument. There are other similar issues of this kind, too, though this one is certainly a key element in their overall interpretation of the presence of the Ragnarök myth in the inscription. Overall, I think it’s one thing to argue that Scandinavian society and culture was affected by the “536 event”, or even that this effect might have had a lasting impact on the mythology, but then quite another to suggest an early 9th-century inscription is making fairly explicit reference to that event. Also, I think it’s one thing to argue that the Rök stone seeks to place the untimely death of the memorialized son within a mythic context (as others have done), but I think that the particular interpretation that the authors put forward would (potentially) benefit from more detailed philological support, especially where they choose to depart from more “familiar” interpretations. So, this is all fun and interesting, and very far indeed from the craziest things written about the Rök stone (some of which are quite crazy!), though I think the arguments should be stronger (especially on the linguistic/philological side). If that could be done, I think those arguments themselves would carry more weight than the interesting though inevitably speculative effort to link the inscription to the “536 event”.
@carlsefni2 жыл бұрын
I would acknowledge that it's quite possible (perhaps even probable) that the space available in a single journal article would not have been sufficient to allow the (probably detailed and complicated) philological arguments that might more fully support the overall argument.
@Erkynar2 жыл бұрын
Thank you Jackson (Professor? Mr? What is the man's title these days? Expert? Dr! Probably doctor Crawford) for sharing this distilled version of the interpretation! Having read the book, getting to listen to it gave a great review of the matter. Having said that, the book is good. If you can get hold of it in english (unless you read swedish, of course), I highly recommend it. Tack Henrik! Kul att äntligen få lite mer grepp om Rökstenen. Den har funnits i min mentala fatabur sedan 80-talet och boken landade mycket lägligt. Min stackars son lär utsättas för en biltur till Rök i sommar...
@goatboy150 Жыл бұрын
This was fantastic. Thank you.
@anderskristoffersson65872 жыл бұрын
A local myself, I should go look at it again.
@bjorn_moren2 жыл бұрын
I've been there several times to see the stone, and it is really majestic. Since it has such a mix of styles and alphabets, maybe there wasn't just one author of the stone. Maybe a few different people over several generations.
@germanicgems2 жыл бұрын
(svarar på engelska så fler kan läsa) We can tell that it was made by one carver from its uniformity. While it employs several ciphers, including a form of elder futhark, they are all carved by the same steady hand and follow a clearly designed layout.
@bjorn_moren2 жыл бұрын
@@germanicgems Thanks Mårten.
@sosteve91132 жыл бұрын
I had the luck to visit it myself,very impressive
@Migul0112 жыл бұрын
Love these videos! Thank you!
@robertl61962 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I'm getting that book.
@maggan822 жыл бұрын
The Old Norse word raukr which became røk in Old Swedish roughly means "stack" or "pointed object",
@Eulemunin2 жыл бұрын
Only 45 minutes long? More please.
@LEGOWENTV2 жыл бұрын
Great episode…thank you!
@yaseinbrat94 Жыл бұрын
Fantastic!! I hope the english version for us American Heathens will be available soon and in hard bound cover with a nice dust jacket.
@gavinrogers52462 жыл бұрын
Another great video. If I could ask for a special request though, could you do something on Alexanders Saga?
@aronjanssonnordberg3072 жыл бұрын
Very good! I think his interpretation of it is very cool.
@islaannisainsworth44432 жыл бұрын
Amazing video. Ty both. Stay curious & open to interpretations. IMHO I really dislike the word "heathen". 🙄 It's ugly. Everyone has some form of belief system. Who is to say what is correct. There are a million systems. Which is right?
@cernunnos_lives6 ай бұрын
Even though we can read the Stone, we still miss it's total meaning. It has important references that you & i don't understand. I'm hoping our new age can preserve as much possible. Context is everything. I'm hoping we look around these areas to find more of our forefathers.
@charlottahogrelius70552 жыл бұрын
Tusen tack. Väldigt intressant.
@carlinberg Жыл бұрын
Amazing video! Thanks to you both for this! At 41:02, has Henrik become influenced by Jackson's pronunciation of "why"?
@Walle30002 жыл бұрын
Interesting clip, close to home for me, lots of runstenar around lake Mälaren and Roslagen.
@end0skeleton4042 жыл бұрын
I'd buy a copy of that book.
@Sandlund932 жыл бұрын
So it doesn´t say anything about Erik, Björn or the formation of a sea route that ultimately lead to the founding of Sweden? I mean, if we are missing 500 years of our history it could be quite significant. Especially if it was hidden on purpose by say the aristocracy. Why would anyone do this unless they intended "to act, not to seem to be"?
@FlickFreaks2 жыл бұрын
The part I am having difficult understanding (most likely my own limited capacity) is this. I get how a story could be told on several stones. What I don’t get is the lack of linearity. Why skip parts 3-11 & immediately pick back up on part 12 in the exact same stone.
@jonathanryals99342 жыл бұрын
I speculate they wanted a "finished" product and intended to put it all on there but realized they didn't have room so they skipped to the end.
@Reikianolla2 жыл бұрын
The thing is just that it's just a theory. There is so little to go on.
@troelspeterroland69982 жыл бұрын
Maybe, as a kind of funeral formula the poetry was so well known by everybody that it was perfectly fine to quote a bit from the beginning and a bit from the end.
@jonathanryals99342 жыл бұрын
@@Reikianolla yes, speculating about history is crucial to the discovery process but there are definite pitfalls. Having "pet theories" is a no-no.
@germanicgems2 жыл бұрын
@@samsonsoturian6013 Compared to any other runestone it is definitely not sloppily written. The orthography is extremely consistent and there are basically no errors.
@explodingmonad45352 жыл бұрын
Good video Jackson!
@gianninodibiase3092 жыл бұрын
Beautiful products, congratulations
@kimfleury Жыл бұрын
Interesting puzzle. I'd have to hear the argument for the interpretation that the runes are a memorial to the ascendency of a Swedish king to the throne, and even then I'm nowhere near knowledgeable enough to take a side. I do find it interesting that so many of the comments are dead set on the Swedish king interpretation.
@GustavSvard2 жыл бұрын
I can hear you're both comfortable with the Old Norse language, but there's still a clear hint of English in Jackson's pronunciation and of Swedish in Henrik's. I'd say that Swedish is much more obvious in Henrik's Norse than in his English. Which is neither strange nor bad in any way, more just fun to notice.
@jonnyueland7790 Жыл бұрын
The first part of the Rune-stone could be a description of the start of the dark ages, as the moon and sun would dim down (maybe for 12 moons/months). And that many people died . The back side, the one about the brothers could well be they had the same lastname, like Olafsøn and there sons would be called Olafsøn also.
@alexandriadesrameaux7208 Жыл бұрын
Hi sir. I just got curious about the runic language. I have a question. Is it possible the ancient people didn’t make a mistake. Could the used both forms of writing interchangeable? Can it be it’s like sling in English language? I am sorry if I don’t know anything about this subject but the video is soooo interesting.
@MrBarborosa Жыл бұрын
Fully earned lifestyle. You are top notch dude
@theoldfart86322 жыл бұрын
I used to live 500 meters from that stone
@anglosaxonking2 жыл бұрын
Do you often see elder Futhark and younger Futhark, mix-matched in popular culture, for example on t shirts or in movies? Are they often mix-matched on rune stones?
@daniellac.75882 жыл бұрын
From what my teacher told us when we studied that runestone it's actually very rare to find both elder and younger futhark as well as secret runes (actually might be the only one so far). That's one of the main reasons why the rök stone is so famous.
@tylerdillon37452 жыл бұрын
I'll buy an English copy of Dr. William's book!
@sadddee2 ай бұрын
Did George RR Martin base The song of Ice and Fire on this story, about Valhalla, Gimli and the last battle?
@richardwoodard9240 Жыл бұрын
Sounds like there’s a lot of guesswork to figure it out what they say
@blainelanders236110 ай бұрын
Who added the highlight pigment to the stone's runes?
@jkoperski99252 жыл бұрын
Very enjoyable and interesting presentation and information. Thank you very much! A former Northern Europe student. Keep up the good work!
@belliott538 Жыл бұрын
George Foreman comes to mind… he named his Boys George… Five of them I believe?
@thesparkypilot3 ай бұрын
Oh cool! I’ve been to this stone before!
@noahriding57802 жыл бұрын
The numbers could be other stones that link the story maybe buried near the area, couldn't they? Did anyone ever check for this?
@martinlund95242 жыл бұрын
@@СусаннаСергеевна THe sad part is that we don´t know how many stones that is missing or have been destroyed. How many stones are still in churches or foundations. Some was maybe destroyed of the "new era" and everything old, must be destroyed. There is quite a lot of small stones here and there in Sweden. But most of then does not say much more than someone make this stone/writhing over there father or son that died eg. There is quite a lot of small hills here and there. But most places does missing stones. why? How could a small hill survive but not a small stone? Sadly most places was just visited long time ago and not much time or money to do some rediscover if there is more hills or stones close by.