"I know you probably haven't seen that video because it did terribly. It only partially worked and millions died through famine." Damn, I didn't realize your channel had that kind of influence
@Thatshistoryright3 жыл бұрын
"I really enjoyed making it!" -Simon or Stalin regarding the 5-year plan, who said it first?
@StrangerHappened3 жыл бұрын
*The industrialization project did not cause the 1933 famine, corruption within the government did.* Also, the project has worked like nothing else anywhere in the history of mankind. Over 9000 (literally, it is not a meme) factories were built in the 1930s in the USSR. In regards to famines, on the contrary, industrialization has allowed to dramatically increase agriculture production which has meant that the 1933 hunger was the last major one ever (even during WWII there was no famine except for Leningrad which was genocided by the Nazis and Finland). So Simon is not correct on this point.
@billd.iniowa22633 жыл бұрын
@@StrangerHappened You must be talking strictly about the Soviet Union regarding famine, right? Its my understanding that the the majority of the 60 million deaths in WWII were caused by hunger. Much of them in East and Southern Asia.
@StrangerHappened3 жыл бұрын
@@billd.iniowa2263 Yes, I was talking about the USSR since Simon's video mentioned was about the USSR's industrialization program.
@rinzo20093 жыл бұрын
Where's the link to this video that did so terribly?
@MrAktilos3 жыл бұрын
That Sound Effect at 7:53 got me good lol
@TheI3lacky3 жыл бұрын
It was the second time in that video... thought i had some over weird Tab open haha
@Rigby993 жыл бұрын
It's a guy saying in spanish "I'm going to kill myself woooooooo" in a funny way. I think that it was a meme and they use the clip without knowing
@genericscottishchannel16033 жыл бұрын
Imagine how the crew must've felt after that landing
@alklazaris37413 жыл бұрын
I laughed good, it was just unexpected.
@tboda26213 жыл бұрын
How about the sound effect of his voice starting phrases loud and clear, then many times fading away to almost nothing. I'm outta hear!!!
@cattibingo3 жыл бұрын
Simon really likes that jumping tank footage doesn't he?
@jsplicer93 жыл бұрын
Who doesnt love a tank designed by a race car driver
@sabotabby33723 жыл бұрын
BT-7 go wheeee
@shngsam87773 жыл бұрын
seems like a BT-5 or a BT-7
@Fish-kz8xw3 жыл бұрын
WEEEEEEE
@jthemagicrobot39603 жыл бұрын
He also likes jumping sharks
@amaccama32673 жыл бұрын
The Russian 5 year plan IS a great video. He's not paying me to say this. It's actually one of my favourite ones.
@TerenceClark3 жыл бұрын
Danny, is that you? Did he promise to let you out of the basement if you plug a video for him? ( it's a Business Blaze reference, if you're not a Business Blaze watcher)
@amaccama32673 жыл бұрын
@@TerenceClark Yo Bro. I'm OGBB. 😉✊
@BigGahmBoss3 жыл бұрын
Can't call myself OGBB if I skip any of fact boi's videos. I definitely gave that its watch time
@I_Have_The_Most_Japanese_Music3 жыл бұрын
I'm trying to decide whether or not I should watch it. Could you make a video about it?
@sabotabby33723 жыл бұрын
The T-35 transmission was actually remarkably reliable compared to other tanks of the time, however it was nearly always used for far longer than intended between maintenance cycles
@CZ350tuner3 жыл бұрын
The tank pictured at 6:08 is, in fact, the T-32 heavy tank prototype. It was much shorter and featured 6 bogie wheels per side.
@Batmans_Pet_Goldfish3 жыл бұрын
"... and some tanks that pretty much sucked." _Shows footage of a BT-7._ *DON'T YOU DARE.*
@tamlandipper293 жыл бұрын
BT7 in close combat 3 . If you train up the crew it was pretty good
@stephenlitten17893 жыл бұрын
@Pope Francis It was use them or the T-26, which was just as bad but s l o w e r
@BHuang923 жыл бұрын
Although the BT tanks were very fast and reasonably armed, they have some negative aspects such as poor crew layout and very thin armor. It didn't help much that the majority of those BT tanks were poorly deployed (although it did well abiet in some limited areas).
@stephenlitten17893 жыл бұрын
@@BHuang92 For the day, they weren't terrible. Armour was about the same as every early/mid '30s design, crew numbers about par too. Zhukov used them well at Khalkhin Gol. What hurt them was the USSR's pitiful electronics industry. When the Third Reich plus allies invaded in 1941, the BTs were in the process of being replaced. The other problem (apart from mobilisation issues) was the unbalanced nature of RKKA mechanised units (but only Germany had the balance right for much of the war).
@thepebblesexplore833 жыл бұрын
I’ve got the 5 year plan queued up after this one just for you. And because you make my morning routine easier.
@hanzup41173 жыл бұрын
I was about to give the comment section a fun fact, but Mega Projects beat me to it. Bravo.
@afrog26663 жыл бұрын
Fun Fact: Megaprojects beat you to it :p
@hanzup41173 жыл бұрын
@@afrog2666 Second time now lol.
@foxtrotcharlie54733 жыл бұрын
@@afrog2666 e
@alm59923 жыл бұрын
One of my favourite tanks! Not because it was good or practical but because it has flippin' five turrets!
@steeljawX3 жыл бұрын
Suggestion, you should look into covering the KV1 tank because of the pretty amazing story involving 5 of them and one Zinoviy Kolobanov at the Battle of Leningrad.
@alfredmarcos17613 жыл бұрын
I love how tank innovation was like throwing stuff at the wall and seeing which stuck.
@polarvortex3294 Жыл бұрын
In a way it's still happening. The world still isn't sure if the Russian Armata tank is any good. It's either a great leap forward or an engineering dead end, it seems. Probably, in light of your observation, the Russians should test some of 'em in Ukraine to see if they "stick." But there's no sign they're itching to do that.
@CR-xl7zu3 жыл бұрын
I like how the medic covers his patient as the beast rolls by at 14:55.
@suttonssuperstars76793 жыл бұрын
Simon releasing 5 videos on 6 different channels.., somehow.. or what we call Monday. Just an average day for the beloved Brit, who needs a bloody holiday!
@megaprojects96493 жыл бұрын
fact boy delivers the goods
@thomascampanelli34373 жыл бұрын
@@megaprojects9649 As a Business Blaze watcher (Your best channel), I get the fact boy part
@definitelynotjasonmomoa3 жыл бұрын
@opener of the world ..........huh?
@dannydetonator3 жыл бұрын
@opener of the world 🚫😭
@thomaslanguell72573 жыл бұрын
"Comrade Stalin, what is your command for glorious new Soviet tank?" "Go big or go gulag!"
@ironfelixfromkuban25803 жыл бұрын
Actually, in USSR created many unrealistic plannes. Projected many assault tanks, from 50 ton (T-35) to 600 ton (and, initiative - 1000 ton), T-35 was a "small brother" of 75-, 90-, 100-ton tanks (Sirken tank, TP-1, TG-5, T-42, T-39), but, these tanks also was a "small brothers" of 400-600 ton tanks (500-ton Danchenko tank, 400-600 ton tank with 8" main gun and with armour, "with protection of 150 mm guns", ~ more 200 mm). Also, projected huge airplanes (150-ton bomber with 200 m wingspan), huge ships (9x20" guns, 20" belt, 24-28 knots), and more crazy vehicles. But, Soviet industry wasn't a true powerful for this projects. Concept of T-35, in fact, was an old WW1 tank concept, created by engineer Gul'kevich in 1915. "We need a heavy assault machine, with 3" short-barrell main gun, two 37 mm light guns and 4 machine guns, on caterpillar base". Yes, Gul'kevich reckoned that 4 machine guns would be enough, not a 7 MGs :D
@alphaprawns3 жыл бұрын
The T-35 was only really deployed in Barbarossa because they already had them so they literally might as well use them. The Soviets had already stopped development of multi-turreted tanks (and they did indeed have a few protoype heavy tanks competing to replace the T-35) as combat experience in the Winter War had immediately proven that the concept of a multi-turret tank just doesn't work. This is why the KV-1 won out as its replacement, as the only conventional heavy tank it was by far the most effective.
@johnludmon74193 жыл бұрын
There was a reason that they only produced 60 of them in 10 years they had worked out that the tank was over weight and under armoured and just too big and clumsy. The tank had very marginal reliability the transmission regularly broke and the crews were perfectly aware of the tanks shortcomings. But the tank did look intimidating on parades and did show what the USSR was capable of as prior to 1930 they hadn’t made many tanks of any size and they made the first ones in 1933. It is easy to pick faults with the tank it was a logically designed bad idea that by 1940 was obsolete but I would argue that the T28 was one of the best tanks of the 1930s and the T26 and BT 7 were as good as all the other light tanks of the 1930s just that they were used very badly in the opening months of the German invasion.
@InvestmentJoy3 жыл бұрын
Who would have thought that a land battle ship would fare in ww2 as well as a sea battle ship.... Hmm.. Of course, at the onset of the war it was hard to understand what did and did not work. Almost everyone planned for a ww1 repeat in some way. What's interesting to me though is that Germany effectively positioned its military to be on the offense, everyone else on the defense.
@LockKey063 жыл бұрын
Never thought I'd see you here. Anyway everyone was ready but not expecting it so quickly except for Germany using the panzers 1, 2 and 3 they could out match most larger tanks with speed, numbers and airsupport.
@InvestmentJoy3 жыл бұрын
@@LockKey06 I'm a ww2 nut
@ericpear42053 жыл бұрын
Soviet Union pre-purge was poised for aggressive war, they were the first ones experimenting with massed tank and airborne offensives, big military manoeuvres in early to mid 30s, experiences of which were used extensively by the wehrmacht later on. Nobody else in Europe had a lebensraum to achieve or revolution to export, hence defensive posture.
@G60syncro3 жыл бұрын
Now if everybody got on board with land aircraft carriers, things would have gone down differently!!
@stevewhite40803 жыл бұрын
I have no idea what y'all saying but I'd still listen
@ferallion3546 Жыл бұрын
It’s interesting to see historical points when a weapons platform’s designation, landships in this case, is taken literally.
@lorinzylks42542 жыл бұрын
Funny about that last statement, Hutts are actually incredibly agile, strong, and mobile - years of indolence and indulgence as the heads of one of the largest crime syndicates in the galaxy was what turned them into the fat sluggos we know today. Make them exercise a bit, and they’ll actually become super effective soldiers.
@mcmoose643 жыл бұрын
Not the only production multi turret tank . Some variants of the British Cruiser mk1 tank were fitted with 2 machine gun turrets mounted on the front corners of the hull.
@chrisslky70183 жыл бұрын
I know someone that built a 1/16 RC T35. Custom build! I am still in awe of it's size next to other tanks. Cheers!
@christiangauthier7273 жыл бұрын
"[...] or rather, Jabba the Hutt, with plenty of guns." HILARIOUS! 😂
@DBurpees13 жыл бұрын
It’s more hilarious when you realize that he really doesn’t like Star Wars at all.
@JP-xg6ij3 жыл бұрын
"Bigger is not always better" Except when it is
@droopmasterflex28223 жыл бұрын
That's what she said
@JackTalyorD3 жыл бұрын
Especially when it's a KV- .....
@arnowisp62443 жыл бұрын
My Hard drive agrees!
@JackTalyorD3 жыл бұрын
@@arnowisp6244 so much porn online must download it all.
@larsivsi3 жыл бұрын
I think a video on the Soviet move of factories east during WW2 would be interesting. Nevermind the tanks, how do you even move the things producing them?
@jojofan37533 жыл бұрын
This literally sums up the soviet idea of big and scary. "Ivan new tank must have decent fire power. How do we increase combat capability?" "More gun!"
@cattibingo3 жыл бұрын
"Not enough gun. Still more gun"
@DefinitelyNotEmma3 жыл бұрын
Germans: more armor Soviets: more guns Americans: more sandbags British: more tea
@DefinitelyNotEmma3 жыл бұрын
@@cattibingo fun fact: the IS-7 heavy tank prototype had like 8 machine guns mounted on the tank, some even facing backwards lol
@USSAnimeNCC-3 жыл бұрын
Sound more like a stereotypical America than a Soviet XD
@michaelhowell23263 жыл бұрын
It's spelled tonk for Russians.
@alyssinwilliams45703 жыл бұрын
The first thing I see when I see this tank is, "This thing is going to be very easy to kill", thanks to all those flat surfaces. Learning later than they were barely more than 20 to 30 mm think just had me shaking my head.
@nickvanachthoven72523 жыл бұрын
we need a video on the sinking of the USS Indianapolis. lots of interesting things happened to it the day prior and right after the sinking.
@MrTarmonbarry3 жыл бұрын
There used to be a huge tank factory in Kharkiv, its closed now and the buildings are used for other things. There is a churchill tank in the city center next to the museum of culture
@thunderbird1921 Жыл бұрын
Bet they're regretting closing that factory now...
@CoolGobyFish Жыл бұрын
@@thunderbird1921 dude, it's Ukraine. back in the 90s, the "businessmen" would privatized sugar producing factories and scrapping all the machines because steel was expensive. they probably did the same with the tank factory. they simply don't care
@hitchedtohorsepower3 жыл бұрын
I watched the 5 year plan video when it first came out. I really enjoyed it, one of this channels best!!!
@hallstuart66043 жыл бұрын
Aside from everything mention in the video it would have been almost impossible for the crew to co-ordinate effectively in battle. The "fightabliltiy" of vehicels is often never mentioned but would play an enormous role in its battle field performance. More so than having all the guns and thickest armour.
@specialingu3 жыл бұрын
im gonna pressume it was intended for infantry support during a advance, ww1 style, so the little turrets would be working semi indepentantly, in the style of airfix kit model box art... all guns blazing :D. also nearly all ww2 tanks had that hull machine gun, which is just a poor (but cheap and easy) version of this multi turret idea
@jojonesjojo89193 жыл бұрын
9:20 the Battle of Brody involved more tanks than the Battle of Kursk.
@Khalrua3 жыл бұрын
simon didn't say
@peterlewerin42133 жыл бұрын
The numbers, as you probably know, looked different before the archives were opened when the Soviet Union fell.
@Blutgang3 жыл бұрын
That cutaway image at about 1:45 is a t34/85. 85 because a 85mm gun not 76. The t34/85 has a distinctive turret from the t34/76 you show just before.
@ignitionfrn22233 жыл бұрын
1:20 - Chapter 1 - Soviet Tanks 3:45 - Chapter 2 - Developments 6:30 - Chapter 3 - The T35 8:20 - Chapter 4 - Combat 12:20 - Chapter 5 - The strange case of the german T35 14:05 - Chapter 6 - A glorious failure
@andrewphillips8341 Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@wmarkwitherspoon3 жыл бұрын
You needed to coordinate with World-of-Tanks and their researcher "The Chieftain" on tanks as their setup is top notch on about every tank that has ever been produced.
@JamesPhieffer3 жыл бұрын
Regarding future episodes, you might want to consider one about the building of the Canadian Pacific Railway. Especially where it went through the Western Cordillera, and the Canadian Shield, it meant building through some of the most difficult terrain on the planet.
@singular93 жыл бұрын
You should check out the japanese O-I heavy tank...now that is a land battleship
@cattibingo3 жыл бұрын
My dumb brain read that as "oi tank"
@DefinitelyNotEmma3 жыл бұрын
@@cattibingo "oi mate, do you have a loicense for that tank? A bit rude to drive over some cars, innit?"
@ВикторФирсов-е9ф3 жыл бұрын
O-I is a bad idea for a video, there was only one prototype and there is close to none information about it. On the other hand, there were 60 t-35s and they participated in the war effort.
@richardaubrecht28223 жыл бұрын
How bout Char 2C? French giantt tank developed for WW1 and used in small numbers in WW2.
@mike76523 жыл бұрын
@@DefinitelyNotEmma "Quite right, apologies guvna! Just takin' me mum on 'oliday, I was."
@MrMan-zx6wm3 жыл бұрын
I’m so happy Danny decided to write a script for this!! And every video never ceases to amaze me and this video was no different!😁❤️
@michaelhowell23263 жыл бұрын
Shut up, Danny. Stop tooting g your own phone. Haha
@rasimeraj38253 жыл бұрын
Excuse me! The BT series of tanks were one of the most influential tanks post World War One and was a very effective tank so give it the RESPECT it DESERVES! Also sonic meme haha tank jump 1:27 I think.
@petergray27123 жыл бұрын
Except that the BT series was just a Christie tank design, and not an indigenous Russian design. And by 1941 it was obsolete due to thin armor.
@rasimeraj38253 жыл бұрын
Peter Gray, well Russia used a lot of BT's and i am pretty sure it was used in the Spanish civil war, and I never talked about where the BT series of tanks came from and I don't care about 1941 as it is during WW2, also of course it isn't that good during WW2 genius I said "post war" as it had a canon, ok armor, and amazing mobility, and In the POST WW1 era this was very modern for a tank design, thus a very influential way of making tanks after the old way of slow, lots of guns, and large tanks of ww1. Thus is the reason you should give the BT tanks respect.
@davidbrennan6603 жыл бұрын
“Any tank is better than no tank”..... a Red/Soviet Army formula..... the Wehrmacht 1945 understood that as well.
@mustafaemad36143 жыл бұрын
Mega Project suggestions: Benban Solar Park, Aswan High Dam, Bar Lev Line and Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam.
@TheRich4643 жыл бұрын
Thank you for all you do
@joeking42063 жыл бұрын
Another excellent video. Very professionally made, shot and edited. Have you ever done the TSR2? A fascinating story of engineering, politics and hubris.
@UlyssesSGrant-mc3lf3 жыл бұрын
I hope you were mistaken when you showed a T-34-85 at 1:46 because you said it had a 76mm instead of a 85mm gun
@jsplicer93 жыл бұрын
Another great tank video! You might want to consider making a video on the planned successor to the T35, the SMK (and its competitor, the T-100). Also, the Char 2C being the dimensionally largest tank ever put into production would be a great video for the channel. If you need any info/sources etc. I just wrote an article for the Tank Encyclopedia on the 2C.
@jsplicer93 жыл бұрын
Just to elaborate, the SMK was a 2 turreted behemoth designed to replace the T35, it was used in the Winter War against the Finns, but the single turreted version (the iconic KV tank) performed better and would go on to mass production.
@MostlyPennyCat3 жыл бұрын
You should have a look at the Sherman Crocodile tank, a flame tank. One of the set of tanks known as "Hobart's Funnies" These were a very important set of designs drawn up for D-day.
@jochannon3 жыл бұрын
The Crocodile was built on the Churchill, not the Sherman.
@MostlyPennyCat3 жыл бұрын
@@jochannon What a bizarre typo on my watch! Of course it's the Churchill, I see the Croc almost daily, it's outside the D-Day museum where I live in Portsmouth, England. We've also got a sunken Mulberry Harbour! Thanks for the catch
@jochannon3 жыл бұрын
@@MostlyPennyCat you've got a mulberry?! That's so cool!
@06colkurtz3 жыл бұрын
The T35 was based off the independent concept for a breakthrough tank to defeat trench warfare.
@samkanakkanatt57083 жыл бұрын
Could you do a video on the M1 Abrams? Or any modern day tank?
@reecedawson61133 жыл бұрын
Suggestions: chieftain, centurion and the English electric lightning or even the SMK soviet multi turreted tank
@awg63973 жыл бұрын
MAAAAAN I thought my wife was watching another insta reel when I heard that WHEEE, then realized she has her earbuds in. Well done,sir
@chrissilsby43123 жыл бұрын
Mr Simmon Whisler I have a tank for you to check out. A tank made in co-operation with Swiss Army and Imperial Germany, made in the mid 1920's. It "Road Wheels" were truck tires, in one type lifted and lowered into position by hydraulic pressure systems. There a few pictures of the tank and few remaining today. One is in the Swiss Military Museum. They were trying to rebuild it.
@KumiTheFolf3 жыл бұрын
1:44 a T-34-85 with a 76.2 mm gun... god job well done.....
@Tamburahk3 жыл бұрын
well what do you expect from some one who reffer about T34 in 1940 as "most modern"..........
@narellebenson30473 жыл бұрын
@@Tamburahk and the 70mm, uhh no it's 30. He must've read the smk ?
@Tamburahk3 жыл бұрын
@@narellebenson3047 yea, i just hate when some "influencer" presents history in such shit way
@mattevans43773 жыл бұрын
I know it wasn't a 'mega project', but could you do a video on the KV series of tanks? Some of the stories about the early battles are amazing, plus I genuinely believe the KV-1 was one of the reasons the Soviets ended up winning (or at least not losing).
@tomrichter2443 жыл бұрын
Have you ever done a video about how the Soviets pulled off the massive move of their factories further east?
@chrisemens4022 Жыл бұрын
I loved the 5 year plan video! Granted I fell asleep and therefore need to watch it again, but I really did like it.
@Tenkai9173 жыл бұрын
When you change all your officers and replace them with new people, the army is not very good. The US would do well to take note of this.
@whatbuttondoipush3 жыл бұрын
Your not screaming about how Danny is chained up to a radiator in your basement, and that's become kinda weird. OG Business Blaze!!!! Simon's best channel!~!!!!$%^&
@andregaupp18013 жыл бұрын
I lost it at 1:24 with the jump lol
@cattibingo3 жыл бұрын
Haha tank go "wooo"
@jackgibsxxx07503 жыл бұрын
Can you imagine what it was like in that tank when it landed?? Talk about hitting your head on the roof. 😵😵😵😂😂😂😂😂😂
@AndrewBaker-ym3mk3 жыл бұрын
BT5’s very insane
@stephenlitten17893 жыл бұрын
He hasn't shown film of the aerial deployment of a T-37 into a lake. Spectacular!
@sampilcher71963 жыл бұрын
I saw the video on the 5 year plan, it was super interesting and a great video!
@martinxy12913 жыл бұрын
Soviets march into berlin. "Hey Mark, I think I found Bertha" "BERTHA ITS BEEN SO LONG"
@TSmith-yy3cc3 жыл бұрын
I missed that Danny wrote this, but it all clicked when I heard beds and Mini Coopers used as units of measurement.
@phantomechelon3628 Жыл бұрын
Hey Simon, while we're on the subject of massive Soviet tanks, could you please do a video on the Object 279? It was an experimental tank developed in the mid-late 1950s (Cold War Era!) and only a couple of prototypes were built, but it was an absolute monster!
@liamparker99053 жыл бұрын
Another great video! I’d love to see a future Side Projects on Hitlers Flak Towers. The Nazi AA towers are a masterpiece, as is Flak. Unfortunately no good videos as of yet but this is the channel for the job.
@davudlastname25453 жыл бұрын
I think Simon really likes the bt-7
@neilwilson57853 жыл бұрын
I've seen the Independent tank at Bovingdon. It is amazing, and you can see how terrible it would be in combat (or even getting to the battlefield).
@thedungeondelver3 жыл бұрын
_>The Chieftain, Sofilein, and Potential History have entered the chat_
@thomasjones26113 жыл бұрын
Potential history 🙌🙌
@davidbrennan6603 жыл бұрын
The track tensioning system will be covered in detail.
@KentuckyFriedChildren3 жыл бұрын
Oh bugger, the tank is on fire.
@leopardone23863 жыл бұрын
Great video once more ! Simon I've gotta ask? Why not do the T 54/55? That tank while basic is the most mass produced tank in history and has seen war almost everywhere. .......Also Simon I have that same exact shirt.
@forthencholordofadmirals27633 жыл бұрын
"Jabba the Hutt with plenty of guns" 🤣🤣🤣 as a Star Wars fan that's a good one Simon
@gavinwhatley48103 жыл бұрын
The number Jelly Babies is the only valid unit of comparison.
@Drew707213 жыл бұрын
I really appreciate the effort you put into your videos ...on this channel and other ones ...very nice...
@danielhristov61753 жыл бұрын
Dear Simon, do not underestimate the big lumps mounted in tanks and other heavy vehicles. In heavy machinery Torque is key, not horsepower. My truck has “only” 470hp but it has well over 2000nm of torque. Result? It goes uphill at around 45mph while fully loaded... if you let those 4 minis tow the amount of weight my truck is capable of I don’t think they will get far... in fact I believe you would be able to overtake them by foot...
@DUDEWithDODGES3 жыл бұрын
You should make a video on the tiger tank. The most feared tank during WWll
@Dank-gb6jn3 жыл бұрын
Do a mega project on Mosin Nagant rifles. Soviet factories were masters at cranking out tanks; but they also were voracious gun manufacturers.
@vrod6653 жыл бұрын
Do another Five-Year Plan Video. I will watch the whole series of them. Promise. The first was excellent!
@numbr173 жыл бұрын
Thanks for another brilliant video, Simon! Wonderfully put together. As usual :)
@CommodoreFloopjack783 жыл бұрын
I love these military-related videos. Always good stuff.
@garyjust.johnson14363 жыл бұрын
Simon is the busiest man on youtube and perhaps even the galaxy if not the entire universe!
@harryhcroft3 жыл бұрын
That "Yahoo" easter egg at 7:55 - can confirm, it made me chuckle
@nickyblue48663 жыл бұрын
Weeeee!!!!
@Crimethoughtfull3 жыл бұрын
That T-35 is amazing! I thought I was a pretty big Dub-2 fan, but I've never heard of this one...wow, multi-turret, multi-caliber, like an old-school pre-dreadnaught battleship!
@polarvortex3294 Жыл бұрын
If you like this tank, there's a French tank that you aught to learn about. Like the T-35, it looked good in parades and made for great propaganda pictures, but it was even bigger -- some say the biggest tank of all time. It was an old design, and in some ways it was obsolete even as it was being produced, but the French were prepared to use it in WWII if they could. Unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately for its crews) it was caught up the debacle of that campaign and most were left stranded on a train and blown up to prevent their capture. Anyway, you should look it up: I think it was the Char Bis 1, but some tank nerd here can correct me if I'm wrong. 😉
@polarvortex3294 Жыл бұрын
I guess I'll be the nerd. It was the Char 2C and this channel already has a video on it.
@styx49472 жыл бұрын
That Soviet evacuation of industry to the Urals is a mega, Mega project. I'll have to check on one of the million channels you're on right now.lol
@Michael-fq4pi3 жыл бұрын
Love the star wars reference at the very end when we all know Simon has no idea what it even is
@KevinOConnell003 жыл бұрын
I watched it Simon, the whole thing . . . twice. Soviet era social industrial policies are really fascinating.
@insidesmells3 жыл бұрын
A video on the Harrier series would be great
@angelitabecerra2 жыл бұрын
Quite literally just watched your Soviet 5 Year Plan video a few videos back. I'd watch videos on the other 12 5 year plans
@danielvandersall6756 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, your vid on the Five Year Plan is very interesting. Thanks for recommending it, in fact.
@ArGeeAye3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the time and effort in making your content. :)
@jacobhuff37483 жыл бұрын
Simon if you find tanks with flamethrowers to be surprising than Hobart's Funnies might be a good subject for sideprojects. Funny to laugh at til u realize that they make sense.
@joeschmalhofer61093 жыл бұрын
Jabba the Hutt with guns? Perfect!
@otohikoamv3 жыл бұрын
One thing not mentioned in the video, which I think adds even more of an ironic twist, is the Treaty of Rapallo - a 1922 agreement between the newly-created USSR and the Weimar Republic-era Germany. On the surface, it was simply a treaty to normalize relations and renounce any German claims on Russian-controlled territory (which the Bolsheviks gave away vast swaths of in 1918's Treaty of Brest Litovsk). But there was a secret protocol to the Treaty of Rapallo: because post-WW I Germany was massively restricted in the size of the military and type of military equipment they were allowed to have, they secretly began sending personnel to Russia to train in the latest forms of warfare and cooperate on technology. The biggest focus of this clandestine cooperation by far was in tanks and armored warfare - and it lasted well into the mid-1930s. Long before Soviet and German tanks got to face each other in the Spanish Civil War, both sides were intimately aware of each other's ways of thinking about tanks, and each other's technological know-how. All of which makes the T-35 even more bizarre - the Soviets both trained with German tank warfare experts, and then faced off against them in Spain, and STILL made and kept this monstrosity!
@DarrylAdams3 жыл бұрын
The T-35 has been a minor obsession of mine. The two take away points I will raise: 1. This was the perfect Stalin tank. While there was a move for multiple turrets in the 30's, the main inspiration was rumours that the Germans where looking at a large tank and where dropping rumours around On hearing this, Stalin ordered the development and deployment on what ended up as the T-35 while the Germans really let the rumours out for a bit of trolling. 2. Three multiturrent tanks saw action in the Winter War with Finland. The results is even worse than you would expect....
@spookayitsme3 жыл бұрын
I'm surprised that Tank game wasn't a sponsor for this vid 😅
@danielm60493 жыл бұрын
"Jaba the Hutt with plenty of guns" That was an awesome line!
@tombstone10553 жыл бұрын
Love to see a dambusters bouncing bomb megaprojects. Operation Chastise was crazy
@5alm0n3 жыл бұрын
The 5 year plan video was great Simon !! Keep it up x
@2jz-boi3 жыл бұрын
bro how many channels does this guy have? he's putting in work
@definitelynotjasonmomoa3 жыл бұрын
I hardly ever remember to thumbs up on videos, but I make sure to give ALL your vids a thumbs up BEFORE I finish the vid, because OBVIOUSLY they will ALL be amazing.
@tonyennis17872 жыл бұрын
The reason tanks had multiple cannons in the 1930-era was that they didn't have one gun that was good for infantry support, and one that was good for anti-armor. You'd see a 75mm gun that fired low-velocity HE rounds and high-velocity 37mm guns that were intended for shooting armor.
@dcmbb33 жыл бұрын
1:22 did that tank say "oh god here we go whee!" have I imagined that in the background noise? Edit: 7:53 it did it again!
@jessclark20823 жыл бұрын
lol great isnt it, its the sound from a popular meme/tik tok
@TheN0odles3 жыл бұрын
Tanks for this!
@dominatorduck653 жыл бұрын
I'd love to see more of the 5 year plans and how they worked