The WORST thing I've done to my 911 Turbo S!

[@AlzhinSon]

One interesting test would have been to have just the two people adding 158 kg in the back seats on one run and another run with no one in the back seats but 150 kgs of ballast in the front trunk to see how the position of the extra weight affects the car

[@Linda-jm2ez]

They do have friends and families that they gotta get back home to, you know😅

[@ninoloso]

I think with more weight in the back seat and no one in the front passenger seat, the 0-60 will be quicker than with only the driver

[@justinbocchino5141]

I think the conclusion would be what you think it would be. adding weight to rear will improve 0-60 slightly and adding 150kg to the front only will hurt 0-60 slighlty. but adding weight anywhere will hurt the quarter mile time either way

[@AlzhinSon]

@@justinbocchino5141 yes we do have a general and probably fairly accurate idea of how things would go but we'd be able to quantify that gap

[@MonicaHolly143]

@@justinbocchino5141 i dont think adding weight will improve the speed since the turbo s dont really need any weight to grip better

[@epicclips3284]

This car's legacy gonna stay for decades what a fine piece of engineering 👌

[@watch2446]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/jKmzgJudYpuKe6s

[@mmmdawe]

and in decades you still won't be able to afford it, fanboy 😅

[@purwantiallan5089]

@@mmmdawe Mateusz W, i belive adding weight only lose 7bhp to the 911 TURBO S. The 911 Turbo S has 591PP. With adding weight, it brought down to 590.

[@rdmz135]

@@mmmdawe nah it will definitely become cheaper in a few years

[@zakelwe]

Best lanching car of the early 2020s...

[@Francisandlili]

I’m shocked about 7l/100km. Incredible for a super car.

[@purwantiallan5089]

The car seems to stood the test of everything.

[@anonym3017]

it's just wrong. it gets 33.5 imperial mpg which is 8.5L/100km. their conversion is with US gallons

[@JStryker7]

It’s not a supercar

[@David-wp6gj]

@@JStryker7 it just is

[@abderrahmanelbakkali190]

@@JStryker7 it smokes 90% of real supercars on all aspects, so it's definitely a supercar.

[@jameswillard1]

I’m shocked at how little effect that extra weight has on the Turbo S, 150kg is roughly 330lbs(!) which is sure to change the weight balance significantly as is adding rear 2 passengers. What an amazing car 👍🏻

[@thabzmad7265]

The test lack the urban cycle test, aka, stop go for at least 7 minutes and freeway cruise for another 7 minutes... This will be a better representation for fuel consumption.

[@purwantiallan5089]

@@thabzmad7265 adding weight only deducts 1 PP to the 911 TURBO S.

[@rdmz135]

It's only a 9% increase in weight.

[@helipeek2736]

Wow, thanks for doing the conversion! 🙄🤦‍♂️

[@geemy9675]

I'm more shocked that adding passengers makes the 0-60 quicker even though the car is AWD...the only explanation I can see is the AWD system is not properly tuned and doesn't know how to take advantage of the front grip as well as the rear grip. more weight cant improve acceleration unless it's more weight on driven wheels. let's say on a RWD , you add 10% of the total weight, but in the back m, resulting in 15% more weight on the rear wheels m, 15% more grip/wheel torque actually transfered to the road. but if AWD is properly implemented, AWD should always be quicker with less weight. I don't know how the torque is actually split, I've read that the torque split is continuously adjusted but even weirder, I'd expect the launch control to be more optimized for 2 people than 4. how often are you likely to drive your turbo S with 4 adults inside, and use launch control?? good thing is that it means there are still small improvements/performance gains to be made on the next gen. otherwise it's getting so close to perfect supercar+daily driver. it feels like hybridization/electrification will come at a good time when they have almost exhausted what they can do with the traditional design gas 911. pdk is already close to as good as it gets. straight line performance is insane. how far can you go with wheel size before it stops looking like a 911 or even a sports car I would have loved to see a lightweight non hybrid 911 with a boxer free valve engine. of you put 2 Koenigsegg TFG 2l inline 3 together, you have a stock 4l flat 6 1200hp engine, up to 1200Nm from 2000rpm or a even 600hp NA GT3 RS with turbos they could still donwsize to 3.0l ...and also WAY better mileage/emissions

[@miguelmsilva16]

Quite impressed by the fuel economy in motorway. Never thought that a car of that kind of performance was capable of less than 25

[@talltrini10]

Gets better economy than my Lexus that has less than half the power, truly impressive

[@salmon4o4]

@@talltrini10 Keep in mind that resetting the MPG tracker while moving at freeway speeds is considered "cheating". I do it all the time for the short term satisfaction in my RC after filling up, and it will inevitably settle down to around 20-22

[@badenwheeler6890]

@@talltrini10 fuel economy isn't based on power its based on wind resistance, rolling resistance and weight in stop-start traffic

[@oskarskalski2982]

33.7 mpg imperial is 8.38 l/100km. Still very impressive for such powerful car but a little more than 6.98.

[@vibingwithvinyl]

Yes. For some reason they converted using US MPG instead of imperial MPG. Maybe Porsche uses that? Didn't notice any mention of it but meh.

[@GraveUypo]

i like how none of those is helpful to me. what's that in km/l? i guess around 12 which is bonkers since my car only does like 9 @ 120kph

[@anonym3017]

@@GraveUypo it's 8.5l/100km.

[@Danse_Macabre_125]

@@GraveUypo Why do you use km/l? I'm curious

[@TheSuperBoyProject]

@@anonym3017 such a shame. My car gets 4 l /100 km.

[@urbanjungle9600]

This video just confirmed what we already knew - it’s an awesome piece of engineering and performs well above its already exceptional spec sheet.

[@razerone49]

I never expected click bait from this channel but that title is the definition of click bait. It wouldn’t be as bad if the thumbnail didn’t say “ruined” which implying he modified the car in a way that purists would label it as ruined. Doing some weight tests on the car doesn’t qualify as ruined or even remotely relate to the title.

[@danzen6246]

There's a question mark like a lot of their videos

[@ashy_gee6]

Another reason why 911 is an amazing sportscar.

[@chillout1109]

4 adults and 150 kilos of ballast! The 992 Turbo S is a proper beast. To think that its performance is not phased by so much extra weight is just insane.

[@fabianoteixeiragoncalves]

The passenger's face in the back left is hilarious... 😂😂😂 like what am I doing here??

[@JaredTopG]

Oh oooooooo ohhh 😎🤣😆😂😂 he is embarresd Coz he was thinking of how can I fit in this small car😎🤣🤣🔫✅

[@JaredTopG]

@Eight8 strong as 5 kg with harsd skin

[@ruhaan6216]

This information can be used in future drag races when the 911 goes against heavier cars

[@alsatch_]

Just make sure you take a dump before going on track next time 🙂

[@PhilbyFavourites]

You old smoothie you…

[@idek_man007]

that fuel economy on the motorway is absolutely insane!!!

[@oskarskalski2982]

That fuel economy is wrong. Matt used conversion from US mpg, not imperial. Correct amount would be 8.38 l/100. Still very impressive for such powerful car.

[@MrCosmin94]

@@oskarskalski2982as you said still good fuel economy. From a 650hp car !!!!!

[@JonBecker81]

Imperial gallon UK = 4.546 L. US gallon = 3.785 L

[@purwantiallan5089]

@@MrCosmin94 👍👍👍

[@purwantiallan5089]

@@JonBecker81 Japanese Galloon: 5555L?

[@theofiloschamalis161]

These weight comparison videos have been epic! Can't wait to see more like this, especially when changing more trivial-ish factors like tyres and drag! Keep it up Mat and team :)

[@Onewheelordeal]

Tires are the single biggest difference you can make to any cars performance, certainly not trivial

[@povilasrikteris]

Would be interesting to see the same tests, but what's happening when you change tires pressure, i.e. from 1.8 Bar to 2.8 Bar every 0.2 Bar or something similar and see how that affects 0-60, 60-0, fuel economy, etc.

[@purwantiallan5089]

@@povilasrikteris what about increasing the downforce on both sides?

[@purwantiallan5089]

@@Onewheelordeal increasing downforce by 4 percent on both sides may do the trick.

[@BoazAfful]

Anyone else fells a spark of happiness when mat uploads a new video 😉?

[@labanmaribii268]

What this test/review did is make me fall in love more with the 911 Turbo S

[@fonexchange8185]

a very good video for education purposes, now do the same test with a 2.0 hot hatch and lets see the major differences in performance in tests when you don't have a big power plant under the bonnet

[@thabihotboy9376]

Check out the same test done on the Dacia Jogger 1.0

[@purwantiallan5089]

@@thabihotboy9376 yep. I already saw it. Hope carwow also uploaded the one with Nissan R33GT-R.

[@AosIma123]

*under the boot

[@chir0pter]

Yes, the 911 has a ton of power and inherently great weight distribution for acceleration, but also and a very powerful and well-tuned active suspension system

[@Falco_e46]

4 carwow adds within 6 mins, and then advertising your own vids afterwards? Seriously?

[@VetteMaro86]

Trap speeds at the quarter mile would've been a good indicator of performance degradation with the added weight

[@Theo5555]

Porsche 911 Turbos is the best all-round super sports car out there. One of the 'cheapest', one of the most reliable, and most everyday usable sports cars. Also at the absolute top in acceleration .

[@rastkodimitrijevic8397]

As a big Mercedes fanboy, I must say, apart from Mercedes cars, this one is my favorite. It's just perfect in so many ways. Beautiful, fast, elegant, sleek, eye catching, just everything. Pure perfection

[@MichaelsOpinion]

Thanks for listening to my slalom suggestion!! ❤️

[@RubberDino]

This is a great video! Would love to see the differences on a small, economy car as well. I have a Kia Picanto (Australia) and I know the difference with a extra 100kg on board is huge!

[@geemy9675]

there is another video with a cheap underpowered three row Dacia with up to 7 passengers.

[@saganworshipper6062]

JFC this car just impresses time after time. If reliability holds, dare I say this is the greatest production car ever? This is coming from a major BMW fanboi! Hats of to Porsche on this masterpiece. Just blown away.....again.

[@nickloong]

What a car this 911 Turbo S, and a practical one too.👍

[@georgespalding7640]

Practical but expensive. $300,000 Plus in the US right now.

[@rohitbishoyi1095]

@@georgespalding7640 6+ months wanting period!!

[@purwantiallan5089]

@@georgespalding7640 2023 may reach $500000.

[@purwantiallan5089]

@@rohitbishoyi1095 more like 17.

[@georgespalding7640]

@@rohitbishoyi1095 I don't think you can even order one now. Porsche is sending just so many to each dealership and when they're just about to get to the dealership they go up for bids. There are NO new 911 Turbos at any dealership in California on display. I did a search the other day and could not find one dealership with one on the floor. It just said here's two that's on the way and dealer will set the price.

[@tharindugamage9730]

Those passengers are like gta npc's they have no soul. They had 0 reaction throughout the video 😂

[@okithdesilva129]

I love these scientific weight vs speed videos! Mat make more videos like this one with more cars and SUVs!

[@rasherbasher8203]

Is there anything you don't love about these videos!?!!! If Mat was having a shit would you love that?

[@tima9790]

scientific? 🤣

[@rdmz135]

It's far from scientific. Way too many uncontrolled variables and not enough trials. Still an entertaining video though.

[@rogerpayne5336]

No matter how much weight you add to a 992 turbo s, it will always be fast as f%^k!......The undisputed king of Turbo Coupes......Great car.

[@ActingTanka]

What an extraordinary car. Would be interested to see the same experiment with a cheap 100hp hatch

[@johnm3907]

I had a 180 bhp glanza v years ago. With 5 in it a 2 litre diesel would pull on you!

[@mohammadhoseinkhatami9703]

Please review the Landcruiser LC300 in depth

[@Conneck_Mhike]

Porsche is just that good . Stuttgart ❤️

[@TonyKimtheamusementparkfan]

This just shows us just how immaculate Porsche is with their engineering ~~ This car is not affected at all when you do all of this and still has effective performance and fuel economy.

[@15sese]

RIP QUEEN ELIZABETH II

[@elms350z]

Finally! A slalom on Carwow!

[@quandaledingle69]

man the 911 its such a technological marvel, it perfectly blends the lines between a mind boggingly quick supercar with a gt daily driver

[@ilyakhlybov6446]

and this technological marvel has broken rear lights 0:37

[@diggernick8628]

@@ilyakhlybov6446 Broken? they work just fine lmao

[@diggernick8628]

@@ilyakhlybov6446 I think youre talking about the split light in the rear light bar? Thats not broken, thats just split in the middle because of UK car regulations.

[@ilyakhlybov6446]

@@diggernick8628 the spot in the middle isn't bright

[@ilyakhlybov6446]

@@diggernick8628 damn

[@ItsDaniPlays]

Nice to see a supercar is being put to the test as well, really enjoyed the Dacia test previously!

[@purwantiallan5089]

What about a test on R390GT1?

[@neokgatla]

The two people in the back help with the weight on the rear.

[@rockdblock1034]

I think all of this is a testament to how awesome the car really is. I would bet doing these same tests to a lesser vehicle would yield severely diminishing results.

[@Andrewzwyatt]

I was gonna say this test only works for a porsche, especially the braking side of things😂

[@Galatzo]

0:43 It's a cone tip

[@okithdesilva129]

We all know that the Porsche 911 Turbo S is a legendary sports car with a cool looking design and ultimate performance! But it's not a legendary truck with lots of torque!

[@18T220]

Do a MPG / weight comparison.

[@dylandiaas]

good video, it would be nice to add the temperature of the breaks before and after breaking so that the comparison is even more accurate 👍

[@wytewizzard]

Brakes goddammit

[@Vartazian360]

Honestly this makes manufacturers look stupid when they say oh 1 lb weight saving on this part as an option for $5000 when this video shows that even huge amounts of weight do very little to slow down a car of this caliber

[@Havanu81]

It's the handling that's affected most when engines are this powerful, not the acceleration. These cars are mostly limited by traction/tires and gears more than power output. And all the extra weight is centered in the middle of the car, so even the balance stays pretty much the same.

[@Vartazian360]

@@Havanu81 its a good point but there is a handling test in this video and it only slowed the car down .2 with 3 extra people in the car

[@Havanu81]

@@Vartazian360 0.2 adds up when you're in say a 24 hour endurance race :). Which this car will of course never be used for. I also believe that 4WD is less suseptible to the extra weight vs handling than 2WD would be, although I could be wrong about that one.

[@AudreyH48]

I'm blown away at the mpg cruising! I have the 3.0T Diesel Cayenne and I can manage about 38mpg cruising like that but it's nowhere near the level of a Turbo S! Wow! The Turbo S is truly a daily driver supercar.

[@badenwheeler6890]

how are you getting better fuel economy in a Cayenne, what speed were you going at?

[@chir0pter]

You have to mention the adaptive suspension and active anti-roll. Most cars, even sporty or performance ones, do not have Porsche 911 Turbo levels of active suspension.

[@BeamNG.Gaming]

Great job First I love Porsche! And Matt and Carwow videos.

[@watch2446]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/jKmzgJudYpuKe6s

[@purwantiallan5089]

Porsche and LoveLive fan here.

[@Soulrollsdeep]

Blows my mind that people think cars capable of incredible acceleration and top speeds will somehow be fucking woeful on fuel when using cruise control.

[@David-xc4us]

Is it wrong that the sped up Mario Carts music was the best part of this vid

[@mrleloscarlet]

Keep up with great work Matt...for some of us it's crazy out here for me....things are just not working out. This is the last year for me on Carwow, social media, etc love & light Matt and Carwow team I've also been praying for ages but nothing is working out for me....see you on the other side people!

[@watch2446]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/jKmzgJudYpuKe6s

[@yuckf0094]

Hang in there mate

[@mrleloscarlet]

@@yuckf0094 Its crazy bro, really dead ass crazy and it's been for ages...at least if I'm getting glimpses of great things for I to believe the is good for me in earth...and I love , respect people I don't do bad towards them but I always get crushed. God is quiet!

[@chasegilmore7158]

Huh?

[@shavy9655]

When i was a kid, i was racing in karts professionaly and it was clear that when puberty kicked in, all the giants kids (including me) had to stop because there was no chance to win competitions when you weigh 20 KG more than another driver who drives as good as you on this level. At the age of 15, i started to race cars at slalom races with a Opel Corsa. The Car was built up and weight was around 1000KG + driver and it had 100hp. You might think now: Well it doesn't make a difference. Let me tell you something: When we were in training for races on the slalom courses and we had a beginner girl (~ 50KG) as a passenger to show her how to drive fast, the times dropped consistantly around !!!!!HALF A SECOND!!!!! (times were always around 50 seconds on those 1km slalom tracks). So even there it was quiet hard to keep up, if you are really tall or really fat.

[@okithdesilva129]

Mat can you drag race a Tesla Model S Plaid against a Lucid Air with The Stig?

[@rayyanali009]

Mat can you make a video where the VW Amarok V6 vs New Ford Ranger V6 race

[@HarshiLLmusic]

Old is gold E46 style ❤️🐐

[@watch2446]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/jKmzgJudYpuKe6s

[@ci4396]

They should add two big chambers in the front and back, which are connected by a hydraulic system. If you accelerate, the weights are distributed to the back, if you break, they are distributed to the front 😝

[@md-detailing]

Love your work Matt,keep up the good work! Please do more videos like these :D

[@smokkeG80]

And Matt said he ain’t rich 🤑 😂😂😂☠️☠️☠️

[@abdouyasser8397]

Keep up with your great videos

[@watch2446]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/jKmzgJudYpuKe6s

[@abdouyasser8397]

How do I get the prize

[@kshark7934]

I love these new type of test 😍

[@povilasrikteris]

Would be interesting to see the same tests, but what's happening when you change tires pressure, i.e. from 1.8 Bar to 2.8 Bar every 0.2 Bar or something similar and see how that affects 0-60, 60-0, fuel economy, etc.

[@purwantiallan5089]

Yep. Add also on both downforces by 6 percent.

[@julescg]

I just can't get over how astonishingly capable this car is.

[@okithdesilva129]

I love the Porsche 911 Turbo S! The Porsche 911 Turbo S have a cool and sporty looking design with absolutely insane performance from that insane 3.83.8-litre twin-turbo flat-six engine! The Porsche 911 Turbo S is one of my ultimate dream car!

[@PushyPawn]

Who says this car is not practical? I heard that the sand bags were very comfortable.

[@makk2042]

Very interesting. 911 HUL (factory supplied vehicle/press car) was a consistent 10.1 second car. Suddenly we are seeing times consistently north of 10.4 on Matt's personal car. What happened to the 2.1 second 0-60 thats repeatable over and over again. The surface seemed pretty dry to me so no excuse there.

[@nobot3560]

he have older modle

[@lee328sport]

There’s more to it than surface conditions. How about air temp, how much fuel was in the car? Is Matts car a different spec with extras that weigh a bit more…. So many variables, but the difference is only a blink of an eye.

[@abderrahmanelbakkali190]

BTW, it had never done 2.1,the fastest time it did to 100 was 2.5 And the reason for the decrease is probably the fact that it's a press car and it has undergone some tough use before it was handed to Matt and also the tires are probably used a lot. So you can understand why it is slower.

[@ak6587]

@@abderrahmanelbakkali190 This is his personal car

[@andryfrancior7662]

Please do more of these videos, they make a huge difference in addition to your car reviews.

[@LearningFast]

Very informative test. I would like to see this test done with an Electric car like a Tesla Model 3. However, you should change the weight of the wheels 🛞 too. Since the EV doesn’t have a flywheel changing the rotational inertia affects it considerably. Also at higher speeds the single speed transmission limits the power of the motors. Adding or removing weight would affect high speed performance greatly.

[@purwantiallan5089]

What about a test on power limiter? Might be interesting if 911 has a 50 percent power limit.

[@goredknight3017]

MY OLD VW PASSAT ESTATE 1.9 TDI 130 BHP B5.5 ( 2003 ) JUST AMAZING WITH THE 508LTR ROOF BOX FULLY LOADED, PLUS THE TRAILER, PLUS BIKES,AND A FULL BOOT LOAD WITH THE DOG GUARD UP TO STOP STUFF FLYING AT THE 3 KIDS. SHE JUST EATS UP THE MILES AND DISTANCE IS NEVER A PROBLEM. THE ONLY THING I DO NOT LIKE ABOUT MY OLD VW IS THE 15” ALLOY WHEELS THAT NEED TO BE SENT AWAY TO HAVE THEM REFURBISHED. BUT SAYING THAT IVE NOT EVER BOTHERED TO UPGRADE THEM, BECAUSE IF IT NOT BROKEN WHY CHANGE IT.

[@Mustbepapz]

"Only people who didn't come from Instagram and TikTok are worthy of liking this.."

[@freddiejones4598]

Tik Tok is literally cancer. The Chinese government created it. In china it’s all educational videos and you can access it after 10pm. The rest of the world it’s created to dumb the world down with utter crap. Very clever from china

[@fluefox7733]

You didnt sub me

[@andrejdestradi7414]

💀💀💀🌹💣👊

[@vojinvujadinovic4184]

I dont even have instagram

[@machaimiloais]

@@vojinvujadinovic4184 why?

[@maxmpuru8616]

When is KZbin gonna flag these guys for false advertising 🙄

[@IM_ROZZ_YT.O1]

Let's w a moment to appreciate how much effort he puts into his contact to entertain., ♥️☺️

[@purwantiallan5089]

👍

[@JaredTopG]

He he he he!!

[@m3tek44]

Another great comparison! Whomever is your vid. Editor is doing great job!! Love it

[@steves5382]

Good old Millbrook, I knew the test drivers of years ago used to take their hands off the wheel in the bowl to do paperwork. Funny how they used to cover crashes up and we repaired them

[@fazer12779]

It has 800NM of torque, what do you expect!

[@nickharalampopoulos]

If your 911 has the ceramic brakes that is the reason you got better breaking every time you do it.

[@tangodrizzle]

0 to 60 in 3.2 while weighing 4627.5lbs is damn quick for a car with "650"hp

[@chantimangi8848]

Nice series keep going very interesting

[@kissgergo5202]

I asked for this test with a high performance car in the previous video comment section and you delivered, thanks!

[@Astro-M0]

“My” turbo S says the leaser 💀💀

[@RedDotChiliPepper96]

What this showed is that weight alone is an important factor, but weight distribution is also really important.

[@razorr_o]

Mat, thanks for listening to your subscribers and making videos they ask you to make. P.S. Will you make a running video of you against Yianni?

[@throwback19841]

Extra weight in the back increases grip: this is why when driving my Jaaaaag XKR I like to keep a lot of heavy things in the trunk. Oil paintings, gold bullion, shotguns, marble statues, priceless artifacts, the koh I noor diamond etc

[@Jeremy-mc2ut]

"Always go for more power is the simple answer to almost everything" Jeremy Clarkson liked this video.

[@kanedg]

Saw you at at Salon Privè Matt, made my day meeting you 😅

[@abderrahmanelbakkali190]

33.7mpg or 7l/100km for a supercar performaning vehicle? Wow that's economic! I'm astonished.

[@seanpaul3050]

Do a video showing the effect of heavier or lighter ROTATING MASS. Meaning the effect of heavier or lighter road wheels. Also bigger or smaller brake discs. The 0-60 times would be interesting. Rotating mass makes a bigger difference than people realise/expect.

[@adrianburcea8282]

this video is just matt explaining that porsche has no excuses. it is just good in any circumstances

[@nikolasb2933]

I think launching the car from the back seat then moving to front to crash stop would be the best of both worlds.

[@Lotus9166]

When calculating the factory weight of the vehicles, 75kg of the driver, full tank of gasoline and a bag weight are included. Adding driver weight is wrong.

[@courtneyburnett6232]

These cars are equipped with alot of things we are not told like altimeters and load sensors which adjust the power output without telling you. So performance is determined but more than just a sticky track.

[@GGMan]

👍 was wondering if you were going to do uphill test again 🤔

[@dragosradici7500]

I would love for this to turn into a series.

[@rafaelh.reynoso4594]

I didn't expect the mpg to change much because your speed was constant. Fuel economy is affected by weight when speeding up. There's more mass to accelerate which requires more energy than accelerating a lighter car.

[@jonathan102]

i think the biggest takeaway here is that weight doesnt matter as much as WHERE you put that weight. Balance is everything

[@Okrainskie_peremoXi]

⚠️AND NOW , MAT , THE BEST ACCELERATION PERFORMANCE TO YOU... - FROM ME❗THE ONE YOU FORGOT ⚠️❗ ⛔THIS TIME , WITHOUT ALL THE BAGS AND PASSENGERS... - ONLY YOU... >>> - " *ON THE BACKSEAT* "⚠️

[@ljmzdev]

I cant concentrate in what you say Matt with the faces from those NPCs lmao

[@clintcowan9424]

AWD, low center gravity and mid engine balance. Now do it with a truck or SUV

[@geoffreyaugust0]

The 911 Turbo S will always be the best daily supercar....and they 100% ARE proper supercars now. Getting almost 34mpg while being able to run a 10.1 sec 1/4 mile is incredible engineering. This car just keeps on amazing me.

[@denokl8604]

Hello, record a video with a review of Reno Scenik 3 improved version

[@3n3ly7m9]

Disappointed. How come you didn't test it with no one in the car? How full was the gas tank? Were the brakes worn out? Did you have the car clayed recently? How many miles are on the car? Can you verify that the friends in the back didn't take extra items to sabotage the experiment? Why did you use sand bags and not a metal cube? Why didn't you use a ballast in the rear? Why didn't you put someone in the front trunk? Was it wet out? How hot was it? What elevation were you testing this at? Was the road grade 0%? Did you give adequate cooling time for the turbos? How long in-between runs? Did you have the spoiler manual down or up? Was there any cross winds or head wind? Can you verify the road was clean and dirt free with no loose materials? When's the last time you blew out the air filter? Did you have the A/C on? Did you have the blower motor on? What octane fuel were you using? What was the exact weight of the car distributed on all 4 corners? Why did you only do 1 test of each? Would you go back again and retry all this? Besides all these questions, I think it was a decent comparison, but was a bit rushed. 7.3/10

[@okithdesilva129]

It's amazing how that Porsche 911 Turbo S handled 400kg of more weight without any problem!