Chevy 1500 2.7L TURBO MAX 4 cylinder (L3B) **Heavy Mechanic Review** | How Does it TOW??

I review the Chevy/GMC 1500 2.7L Inline 4 cylinder TURBO L3B engine as a Heavy Duty Mechanic. This 4 cylinder turbo charged engine produced 310 hp and 430lb-ft of torque. I test out this engines towing performance and review the engines acceleration, fuel economy (mpg), engine braking and general towing experience.
Old North Co Discount Code - "GETTY10"
Website - www.oldnorthco...
Instagram - / oldnorthcompany
Facebook - / oldnorthcompany
What I Use:
Engine Oil - amzn.to/3sVnAoX
Engine Oil Filter - amzn.to/44Vk3nG
Engine Air Filter - amzn.to/3JMmMVV
Cabin Air Filter - amzn.to/3JMZAHh
Gear Oil - amzn.to/3PoIcxa
Penetrating fluid - amzn.to/3EOclkx
Rust protection - amzn.to/3Zo0Rh6
Towing Gear:
10 ton Pintle hitch (2.5" receiver) - amzn.to/3r7Axvm
7 Ton Adjustable hitch (2" receiver) - amzn.to/46i2iAf
Adjustable Pintle hitch mount (2.5" receiver) - amzn.to/3RqHGS3
15 Ton Pintle hitch - amzn.to/45SaCqv
10,000lbs Tie Down Straps - amzn.to/3ZBnxeh
My Camera Gear:
Go Pro Hero 10 - amzn.to/3ObZdJJ
Go Pro Hero 8 - amzn.to/36grzkM
Go Pro Accessories - amzn.to/3JLhlXo
Sony A6400 - amzn.to/3vkqzob
So I was actually very surprised by this 2.7L turbo charged inline 4 towing experience. this engines is actually very capable when it comes to towing. This engine is not the fastest in comparison to other engines in the 1500 truck segmant but this engines shines when it comes to torque delivery.
rarely did this 2.7L turbo charged engine go over 2500 RPM with this 8000lb load which is remarkable. I thought foresure this engine would be revving very high but the high torque figures kept those wheel turning under load
the main reason why this engines can create such good torque comes from the massive stroke which naturally allows engines to build torque from the naturally large crank throw.
another reason why this engine was so unexpectagly good at towing has to do with the turbo. turbo's are great when towing because they can simply supply more engine power on demand without having to downshift the transmissions and get into higher RPM's
overall this 2.7L turbo charged 4 cylinder engine was impressive for such a small package. I felt very comfortable towing 8,000lbs.
the one issues or downside of this engine was fuel economy, fuel economy was actually pretty high at around 11.7mpg for only a 4 cylinder engine. if you are expecting great fuel economy go buy a diesel because this engine when towing will drink lots of fuel.
hope you guys liked the video!

[@TheGettyAdventures]

Many people saying there is NOT enough wind resistance and.. I agree. So, I re-tested this 2.7L with a much larger enclosed trailer and well as you guys will see its a different story!! Check it out - kzbin.info/www/bejne/rpPGp4KeiLh6o80

[@ericj810]

Ya camper tend to cut the wind better then a Vnose enclosed trailer. With a 8000lbs enclosed trailer i would hang in the 96 to 100kmh range on speed. When towing anything I stay in that range. The 2.7 has pulled a 7800lbs enclosed for me at those speeds fine in the mountains of north carolina with about 3800rpm range not highet unless i started pushing the gas down then it started going faster but trailer was wind debt crazy and sway sometimes. Id go 3/4 ton for loads that heavy.

[@Erik-jp7kk]

Because your comparing these trucks with the exact same trailer setup is why I’ll keep coming back…unlike other reviewers constantly changing trailer setups. Keeping a similar rear end ratio is also golden! Fantastic breakdowns also. I would definitely like to see the 2.7 ecoboost. Subscribed!

[@TheGettyAdventures]

Thank you sir! That is the idea behind all these towing tests to try and eliminate as many variables to really only compare the engines and trucks to each other. It would be very nice to have my choice of gearing but usually thats tough to get lol

[@kevinburton5323]

I own one, it has mud tires on all four corners and this engine will light those tires up on the asphalt, I kid you not. If someone asked me if I would consider buying another truck with this engine my answer would be in a heartbeat. I'm sold.

[@Floorguy1985]

I hear they require premium gas which is more expensive than 87 octane. What is your thoughts 🤔

[@chriscarter1026]

@@Floorguy1985I recently got one. Takes 87. Checked the owners manual when I got it to be sure

[@thejudge3132]

@@Floorguy1985 That's recommended for all turbo motors. It'll run on regular. It has a knock sensor..lol.

[@BellaRosaCaneCorso]

I have the same engine, I cut the exhaust from 2 inches to 3 inches and shortened it to head of rear wheel, deleted all resonators, flapper valves, and put on a cold air intake, it’s a completely different animal

[@RFRUS]

I love my 2023 that is now ~2 years old. After a breakin period I took it out and beat on it a bit. Yes, it will light all four tires from a dead stop in 4X4. On a long trip the truck went from 50ish mph behind three semi's and when floored it was up to 100mph very quickly (didn't time it) but my wife was like WOW, this thing is fast!!!!

[@jockosboy17]

I would like to see this tow a 8000lbs travel trailer with all of its wind resistance. This motor seems to work hard getting up to speed because HP is down but it holds speed well because of the turbo low end torque. Pretty impressive. It reminds me of older turbo diesels.

[@twmayo714]

Ive towed a 32 foot travel trailer with a slide out on the interstate for about 3 hours. Was a breeze. Only problem is no trailer brake from factory

[@jockosboy17]

@@twmayo714 Good to know! Crazy it didn't come with a controller.

[@markmaryquinsey]

I am impressed with the sewing machine. Interested in seeing matching test on 5.3L. I steered away from the 4 cyl. and purchased the 5.3. When towing with the 5.3 I get about 11 MPG over short distances and 12+ over longer distances. Ten speed transmission is fabulous for Sunday driving as well as heavy towing. Thank you for this review.

[@TheGettyAdventures]

I think the 5.3L is a solid engine option. it will probably outperformance the 2.7L in towing but for such a small displacement I was impressed.

[@waynepeterson8881]

I have had 3 Silverados with the 5.3 engine. Was very happy with them, but I just bought a replacement truck with the 2.7 engine. My towing is occasional with a max of about 5000 lbs. The new truck pulls the trailer well. The real positive for me at this point is the mileage overall. At just over 2000 miles, with 5 or 6 trips towing my trailer, my average mpg is 20.4. The 5.3 would never do that well even empty on flat ground.

[@jordangiesbrecht05]

​@@TheGettyAdventureswat do u think as far as 3.0 Duramax vs 5.3 for towing? I had a 2014 5.3 for awhile that I really liked but it needed a 10 speed behind it too get it's full potential.

[@clayster89]

5.3 is a dog compared to the 2.7......the numbers don't lie. As far as quick it completely destroys a 5.3 in a drag race. Yes it's thirsty when pulling...I guess I'm one of the few that do not care what mpg I get while dragging a 7500 pound camper

[@JDC129]

The 5.3 is a solid motor for longevity but pretty low on torque compared to the competition at 383 ft/lbs. It also needs to be above 2300 or so RPMs to make it. I have a 2018 Sierra with the 5.3 and the difference between it and the 6.2 is remarkable. I continue to be impressed with this new 2.7L!

[@JohnSmith-ev1sm]

I think it's a myth that GM wanted max fuel efficiency. This engine was designed to replace the 4.3 v6, not the v8's. It's designed to be cheap to build, cheap to maintain (durable), and most importantly be better in emissions. It absolutely thrashes the v6 in every metric, the fact that everyone compares it against the v8's (5.3) shows how impressive it is and how much GM succeeded. It was never meant to be a gas sipper, though it still does much better against the 5.3 in the city unloaded (which everyone fails to mention). TFL Truck has talked to the chief designer, and they go through a tear down of this engine, I think we're going to see how strong and reliable this engine is in another 5 years. Basically it's built just as tough as a diesel, only it runs gas instead. I believe it's an absolute winner given what they designed it for. I personally have a hard time buying one though, my 5.7 ram is just so smooth and linear and sounds amazing too. Hard to find a bad truck these days, they're all winners in one area or another.

[@TheGettyAdventures]

Ya completely agree this 2.7 is a MASSIVE step up from the previous V6 option. Hopefully the reliability is there because if so this is a really cool engine option

[@ajmedeiros77]

Eco beast. Blows this away. Dual fuels injection, 2 more cylinders, over a decade of real world use and improvement. As usual gm is at late to the party and half assed it

[@JohnSmith-ev1sm]

​@@ajmedeiros77 This 2.7 is a BASE engine. What does Ford use as their base engine? Oh yeah, the worst v6 in the segment lol. If I'm paying for an upgraded engine, I'm getting a v8 or (more than likely) a diesel. And the 3.5 EB is ok, but then you're still unfortunately flogging a ford. Eww.

[@JHuffPhoto]

Totally agree about the 5.7 in the RAM. Love the sound and the smooth linear power. It's a very good fit for a light duty truck. My 3.5 eb was a better towing machine but I love my RAM Limited

[@holmes1956O]

My opinion is they are all garbage. I say that because of the canbuss and all the modules that have no place in any vehicle and most all the maintenance problems will be with the electrical system

[@Slane583]

I love my 2020 Silverado with the 2.7 in it, though mine isn't rated to haul as much as these newer versions. Mine also has extremely low miles because it was/is a lease vehicle so I can't speak for longevity. But the lease is now over and we're going through the motions to continue paying on it. So I'll be able to put more miles on it without worrying about going over. We don't own a trailer ourselves so I can't say about its' towing ability but we fill the bed full with material and it hauls it just fine. It drives like there's nothing in the bed imo. While shopping around for oil filters when I was buying supplies to do an oil change I noticed the new 3.0l Duramax uses the same model of oil filter as my Turbo-4. There's a brand who makes an extended length oil filter for the Duramax as an upgrade from the stock unit. They're a few more dollars over stock, but I'll be buying some of those to keep on hand for when oil changes are needed. More oil capacity is never a bad thing especially when it comes to hauling and towing. :)

[@agerardomp]

Greetings Alex. I think the engine 2.7 l. It is a great option for light and medium work. I still think that the best option for medium to super heavy duty work is a diesel. But the best decision and convenience is for each of the users and the size of our wallet. I really enjoyed your video and more your analysis and comments. Without a doubt, it is a great GMC option and its Professional Grade. 😮 BIG HUG from CDMX! 😊

[@dsammy7762]

I just bought the 2024 GMC Sierra with that engine. I was skeptical about it, but when I test drove it. I was super surprised on the get up and go not towing. I’m only going to tow a utility trailer with a gulf cart on it at most. Being that it’s an economical option you don’t get some of the luxuries as the 5.7 version. Really though GMC has a pretty decent base model on them. So my opinion this truck is great, definitely worth checking out for the personal who is skeptical like I was. The only thing I miss is the sounds of a 5.7, they sound beastly compared to this model.

[@jmart3605]

Thank you for the great towing video! I want to add my recent experience. 10/16/23: Completed a 240mile camper tow from Frankfort KY to Central Ohio. Camper = 2015 Jayco Jayflight 32 BHDS, 8680 lbs on the Cat scale. Bumper pull. Equal-i-zer weight distribution bars. Vehicle = 2023 GMC Sierra Evolution 2.7l turbo 4x4. Tow rating 8,900 lbs. No factory trailer package. Installed Prodigy P2 after market break controller. Front squat without load 36.5". With load 36 3/4". Camper trailer completely leveled. Payload without trailer 610lbs. Weather cloudy 55 degrees no rain. Little wind. Old truck broke down but this almost new (5,000 miles) GMC towed really well. But, mostly small inclines (truck at ~3,200 rpm). Ohio flatter and the truck easily held top gear at ~2,300rpm. Fuel mileage 9mpg. This week I've done ~200 miles averaging 25.2mpg (as indicated on the dash). My opinion: it will handle 9,000lbs camper but is heavy for this truck and if it is windy outside then a drive would be 'interesting' - leveling bars a must. Will downgrade my camper to a smaller unit (empty nesters now). Hope this info is helpful to some☘️

[@Long-nd8bq]

That unloaded gas mileage is impressive. I agree that while it will pull almost 9000 lbs, that's a lot of weight to tow regularly with a half ton and if you live in the mountains like me it would make the truck struggle even more. For even monthly frequency of pulling that kind of weight I'd recommend a gas 3/4 ton truck. If you had a 6000 lb camper you'd probably be fine.

[@justdiveitne4115]

I have this motor in my 23 Canyon. Love it so far.

[@TheGettyAdventures]

Wow, this engine would probably nice a quick in those lighter trucks

[@thunderbolt5354]

Key two words ? SO FAR !

[@fscottgray9784]

Engine braking is lacking for sure. If you have the guages switched on for the oil pressure it is interesting to watch this engine increase the oil pressure as the engine is put under load. A GM engineer that TFL interviewed said the engine was tuned more for drivability than for gas mileage. My other truck is a Power Wagon.

[@davefornit6235]

The engine braking in tow mode down steep hills actually was really good at least on the model.i have

[@karlschauff7989]

The amount of engine braking an engine is set up to provide is a balance that manufacturers choose. If you close the throttle body too much to give max engine breaking, you're far more likely to have oil consumption issues. The vacuum will suck oil up past the rings. Ford found that out when they started putting the 3rd gen Coyote in the F-150 and the engine braking was so aggressive that the oil consumption was terrible. I think that's why in recent years GM has been less aggressive on engine braking even though TFL dogs them for the extra brake applications. The oil pressure is due to the variable flow vane-style oil pump GM has been using. I'm just impressed they give an actual oil pressure. Too many manufacturers just give a fake oil pressure gauge that's always at 50% if they give anything at all.

[@zacharyohare2118]

There's one locally for $36k new looks really similarly equipped... I'm tempted. Considering used value will hold almost that for 2 years

[@carterxiong5045]

I’ll keep my 3.5 ecoboost v6. Great power plant despite missing the sound of a v8 but could never beat the power of it stock to stock.

[@wayneowens4761]

we own several 3.5 ecoboost's and they are spendy motors to keep up with, the 5.0 is solid and cheaper in the long run. But I do love the down low grunt of a turbo. I did by the Chevy 2.7 turbo a few months back, took it on 2 long trips with lots of mountains, ran perfect, climbs hills good, fuel economy is ok. Happy with the over all cost and technology of this new engine, and Chevy was dealing ( i have no allegiances here, even Toyota would do ) Well off to the beach today. Peace out.

[@Baranello102]

Your videos are great I appreciate your honesty and your knowledge and for keeping it real

[@jagwrenchstudios1065]

Yes I have one of these trucks and no I haven’t had the chance to towed yet with my truck so I’m glad that I got the chance to watch your video thank you. And yes it is not a swooning machine engine lol .

[@anthonymanzi5298]

I have a '21 2.7 without the max trailering or the upgraded engine, however it has a 9100lb towing capacity.

[@Otownbassin]

That hill between Woodstock and meductic is no joke, my 5.3L use to scream towing up it.

[@karlschauff7989]

It's good for it. Gets the carbon out and keeps the rings happy.

[@marksullivan8200]

Put a pedal monster on it & wake it up it's tuned down to reduce emissions & max mpg while not towing throw a pedal monster on it set it on high level of city driving & maybe some adjustable leaf spring helpers on the rear as many people that intend to tow often would & them compare it to the larger engines to counter the no replacement for displacement argument as the playing field becomes level it'll be a great video with potential unexpected gains across the board just saying not a prediction it's a spoiler

[@marksullivan8200]

It's overbuilt like a diesel on the bottom end & is also has a strong top end & it's responsive like a gas engine from what I was told that said why didn't we get this sooner if it's as good as the say

[@sebitroncycling]

I have a 2023 2.7 6 cylinder twin turbo f150 for my work truck and a 2024 Chevy Silverado Z71 Trail Boss 2.7 4 cylinder turbo max. I prefer my 4cyl turbo max over my Ford.

[@chrisreynolds6520]

My SBC 383 tows my 6,000 lbs brick of a travel trailer behind a 7,000 lbs van tows along at 2,200 rpm and seldom has to drop to 3rd, where it turns 2,800.

[@HolmesProspecting]

Everytime he says "Sewing Machine" take a shot.

[@Truroben]

I'd be more apt to consider the 2.7 if a low range transfer case was an option for it.

[@cj7fun579]

This is a very good combo for the everyday driver that might tow 25-30 % of the time. And when they need the the power, they have it, Plus when not towing, get decent Economy. The only real question I have, is how good the turbo and the dual cam setup is going be when it reaches the 200,000 mile mark (US miles). I've got 210,000 miles on my 2013 5.3, and tow about 7000 Lbs. a 3rd of the time and it still has good pick up when getting onto the Hwy. I can get 18 mpg average between city and hwy if I drive normal, Towing I get around 10.5 Mpg. If this new 2.7 engine can live up to the same standards of the 5.3, It's a huge winner. Thank You for the video 👍

[@SWATT101]

Might be great in the Colorado/Canyon hmmm

[@adammcdowell4128]

Do a 2.7 Ecoboost

[@TheGettyAdventures]

I would really like to!!

[@chanoleyva8584]

The 2.7 ecoboost will do better I bet

[@redline455]

​@@chanoleyva8584I've towed with them both, and they are very comparable to each other. The Ford pulls better at higher RPM but the GM feels significantly stronger in low RPM power and definitely doesn't shift as much on hills. Both do very well though for what they are and are miles better than what we used to have for the 'cheap' powertrain options in 1500's.

[@chanoleyva8584]

@redline455 the fact that they were able to make more torque down low with a 4 banger over a v 6 is pretty impressive

[@redline455]

@@chanoleyva8584 Totaly is, and I give GM major kudos for that. Feels like a little diesel when towing actually. Quite impressive, but like I said before, both Ford and GM have made impressive budget powertrains for the 1500/150 series of trucks. Hard to choose a 'best' out of the two because they have very different characteristics.

[@88corinutza]

i have a 2015 Silverado 4 door dually 6.0 gas rated for 13,800 that will BARELY move my 10k travel trailer lmao

[@burkepete110]

Towing capacity claimed by manufacturers is nearly useless information. Others point out the unknown durability of small displacement, high pressure gas engines. But experienced trailer owners know that truck suspensions and towing stability underway as well as brake control are more important to towing safety than trailer weight ratings. Connect a 10k lb trailer to a well equipped F150 and travel I-80 over the Continental Divide in a 30 mph crosswind. You'll learn much about towing safety. Chevy's new small gasser may prove to be durable but as all farmers know, there's no substitute for weight, horsepower and torque.

[@jasonbrushett2005]

Alex I have to ask why you seem so shocked with the great performance of this engine? Being a heavy duty mechanic, you know the importance of good torque numbers for towing.I've never tried this engine,but given its stats on paper ,I'm not shocked at all by how well it did😊

[@TheGettyAdventures]

Very valid question lol I think I was almost questioning the torque figure and I wanted to see the real world performance and GM is not joking around this engine is full of torque.

[@ryanneenan8472]

Didnt chevy bash ford bach in 2011 when they came out with the 3.5? Now they have there own small turbo engine

[@barrymantei7795]

I've heard that GM is now offering a 7 yr. 160,000km. Warranty on the 2.7 engine, not sure if it is true or not.

[@karlschauff7989]

The 3.0 Dmax has a longer warranty for sure. Not sure about the 2.7 turbo gas engine.

[@calb0]

it is true

[@jamesbroughton9900]

Why can’t my 2.7l Tacoma have numbers like that 😢😢

[@ReflectedMiles]

Show me the transmission at 150k. And the little bicycle-style timing chain with plastic guides that has done so well in small GM cars (not!) at around that same mileage.

[@matthewm3912]

There’s nothing wrong with these motors. I had the 2.7 ecoboost in my F150. I used it for occasional load carrying and towing. Most times it was empty and a family hauler. It was quick as hell, I got 27mpg highway, and super quiet to drive. It also handled and drove better because the front end was much lighter.

[@avz46]

I think you would get much better economy if you slowed to between 90 and 100km/h

[@jefffixesit60]

430 ft-lbs and still you called it a "sewing machine". Towing 8,000lbs @ 110kph, getting just slightly less fuel economy than a 5L V8... How about the 99% of trips made towing nothing? Does the V8 still consume less fuel than the 2.7L I4? Enquiring minds want to know 😊

[@jaredmeche6325]

I was scratching my head when I found out Chevy didn't make it so the 2.7L could take advantage of 91 and 93oct. Then I realized... they couldn't upcharge for the 5.3 V8 if the 2.7L was matching HP and over 100 more torque.

[@karlschauff7989]

It probably has the ability to get some advantage from higher octane fuel, they just don't require 89 or 91. Almost all modern engines are tuned to advance spark timing until it's "bouncing off the knock sensors". That's where peak fuel efficiency and power is. But when they rate the engine's power output, it will always be done with the fuel used to get the EPA fuel economy estimates.

[@tonymartinez6798]

How was the breaking?

[@EGGINFOOLS]

I imagine that if the truck wouldnt have downshifted to 3100 on the downhill it may have made it up at 2500 in a lower gear

[@JeffFoster-s5v]

Great review!

[@TheGettyAdventures]

Thank you sir!

[@jakewade7388]

The ‘99-‘06 Gen 3 V8’s were fine engines. GM messed up after that. Not going for a boosted 4 cyl in a truck.

[@joedoakes8307]

What rear axle ratio's are available , and WHAT ratio did this truck come with ?

[@toddstewart1052]

I don't care about speed.. most pragmatic people only care about efficiency and durability with minimum maintenance.

[@jerryowensjr.5440]

We got one of these at work I still prefer the 5.3.

[@rafaelcassalicamozzato8335]

Its a good culture transition, this engine, due to being turbocharged, with focus on the lower rev band, would perform much better with the 10 speed transmission.

[@RPS13DRlFT]

they should of just put a 4jj1 in them, too bad they probably don't meet emissions standards

[@Sam-j4p1t]

Cummins made a 6.6 liter td?

[@sketchyssk8shop]

Is it me or did the rear tires squish way down

[@neiljuedes1661]

You are pulling a trailer with very little wind resistance. Hook up a an enclosed trailer with the same weight or a 22 ft triple pontoon when it’s windy out and you’ll be talking a different story !

[@thomasmoshier3920]

I bought a 2019 GMC Sierra with the 2.7 L turbo when they first came out. It replaced my 2005 with the 5.3. While I haven’t done a lot of towing, I can say when I have it’s handled it without difficulty. Having owned both the 2.7 and the 5.3, I can tell you I’d buy another 2.7 without hesitation. For my application I simply don’t need the V8.

[@tonymartucci7097]

What was your mileage like?

[@DKLabs99]

I appreciate your comment. I had a 6.2 in 2020 and I no longer feel like I need it. Looking at a truck again I wasn’t even considering another GM but I of course have GM points to use and I almost said forget it, was looking elsewhere. But I will surely test drive one of these soon

[@BradyReading]

Own this engine in the Colorado. Towed 6000lbs of car and trailer from Florida to Colorado averaging 70-75mph the whole way. Rpm’s sat at 2300 the whole way including up mild grades. Engine oil temps never got higher than 225 going over the Appalachians and stayed at around 215 the rest of the time. For a mid size truck application, it’s an excellent engine. Pulls hard, revs low, love it.

[@thomasmoshier3920]

@@BradyReading I can’t imagine anything else in the Colorado/Canyon but the 2.7 L turbo. You can see why they eliminated the diesel and V6 options.

[@snakehead5444]

If I took a shot every time you referred to the 2.7 as a sowing machine I would have forgotten my name.

[@Montana270]

Yea he really was beating a dead horse with that

[@mikebellofatto3023]

I agree seeing machine this that I mean dude 4 cylinder turbos have pulling loads for over 8 years I had 2.7 twin turbo and I could put a pallet of wet sod down in south Florida 100 degrees in summer yeah she would squat but that’s a pallet 500 square feet ways way over 2000 never had prom blend towing enclosed trailers with 2 73 inch zt mowers plus alll the other equipped and 4-5 people inside it always pulled everything you just have to take care of your maintenance

[@robertpulliam9973]

Sewing machine not sowing machine.

[@snakehead5444]

@@robertpulliam9973 tru

[@BradyReading]

Yep. Got old after the 8th time.

[@captinhoop]

I know guys that are using these trucks as fleet vehicles. Over 100k miles on them and no major issues

[@markwiebner7806]

The numbers are impressive. I'd like to see one with over 150k (miles) It's really tough to compete with the good old Chevy push-rod small-blocks. They just run, and run.... I have had 3, 5.3's and they were awesome.

[@cj7fun579]

Yeah, It's really hard to beat the 5.3, they are a solid proven engine for the most part. People have neglected to do maintenance on these engines over the years that I've seen and they just keep going.

[@BS-uf3ww]

I’m @89k currently with zero issues

[@brettloo7588]

Longevity is what anyone cares about. I want to know how it does after 100k of hard work life! My guess is not good

[@henryclark5486]

I have a 2009 with the 5.3, 245,000 miles. I don't believe it has lost a single HP! It will still haul a##! ,and still pull a boat very good.

[@danderson1937]

I had a 5.3 with cylinder shut off. GM sucks. At 189k motor was trash. All proper maintenance was performed. This will not last 150k.

[@mikeriv60]

These engines will be fine since they are way over built and i just laugh at all the people talking crap when most of the other 1/2 ton truck engines have had horrendous problems throughtbout their life of production. I havent really heard of any major issues with these little 4 bangers.

[@jessaphillips2846]

Overall I feel like the Turbomax engine is great. You get enough torque to work with pretty heavy loads and get roughly the same fuel economy as a v8, and roughly the same pulling power as a v8, but when it’s empty you get far better fuel economy.

[@blackericdenice]

You burn more fuel than a v8 towing because it is make more low end torque than they are. I don't have a problem with that.

[@heyscott73]

He compares this engine to a V6? Seems like it is competing with the 5.3L V8. 5.3 vs 2.7 seems like the 2.7 will hold its own against the 5.3.

[@tm12productions5]

Nice towing review but maybe try towing with a RV or enclosed trailer vs a flat bed. The air resistance on those trailers is much greater and has a massive effect on towing, mpg, truck transmission downshifting, etc.

[@kylemj13]

I got 10.2MPG towing my 32' 7400lb travel trailer from Michigan to Wisconin and back. Downshifts were few and far between, much less than when I had my 5.3L with the 10 speed. I got 8.9MPG with my 5.3 on the same trip last year.

[@TheGettyAdventures]

In the future I would like to use an enclosed trailer for the 1500's. I bought that trailer primary to test the HD trucks. tough to find an enclosed trailer that can haul 20,000lbs without paying big money.

[@edgrigsby8610]

I was thinking the same.

[@wayneowens4761]

your doing great, Like the snap on boots, mans man. LOL@@TheGettyAdventures

[@MarkM-xd2zo]

Here's my updated review. I've had the 2023 GMC Sierra Evolution with the 2.7 engine for 10 months, and I've been towing a 5000-pound travel trailer. I live in Colorado, where there are many mountain passes and steep grades. I'm pleasantly surprised by how well this engine performs, even at higher elevations. I'm convinced that it pulls the trailer better than my 98 Silverado with the 5.7 Vortec engine. Like others, I'm sold on this motor and would buy another one. The fuel efficiency is similar to a V8, but I'm okay with that. On empty highways, I'm getting 23-24 mpg, which works great for me.

[@myopiniongoodyouropinionbad]

I didn't realize your speedometer was in kmh at first and was like "HOLY SHIT WHAT A BEAST!"

[@cactneir]

Oh thank you so much. I thought it was strange for a 4 cylinder towing. He must be a dealership worker.

[@johnclements8549]

We just purchased this engine in a new 1500 Chevy Silverado 2023 while coming home from a vacation with our 5.3 2006 Chevy Avalanche that lost the top end on the transmission. We had our Lance travel trailer with us. I too was pleasantly surprised with this powerful little four banger engine!

[@shawnphillips6203]

Thank you for this comment as I’m looking to purchase a Silverado with this engine and I have a keystone bowl of travel trailer

[@fodder_time]

No doubt it performs well for such a small powerplant, but what about the longevity of the engine, especially if you will tow often with it?

[@sly9263]

if you're towing often (and around this much weight or more) you should probably consider a 2500/250 anyway... just my 2cents

[@matthew7972]

@@sly9263ya but that’s about $50k more haha

[@TheGettyAdventures]

Ya I agree the longevity is something that would concern me with this engine.

[@sly9263]

@@matthew7972 no way- maybe $3-5k more tops for a 250/2500 V8 gas (which is why half tons will never make sense to me unless you are OCD about MPG)

[@matthew7972]

@@sly9263 I don’t get why people obsess over MPG when considering a truck. The only truck I think that’s actually impressive when it comes to MPG is the 3.0 Duramax in the 1500 class. Prices of trucks right now are still sky high when it comes to used or new. This Chevy 2.7 L sounds great but longevity is gonna be an issue.

[@mattdagger1480]

I love my 2.7 LT. Didn’t want to deal with lifter problems. Mines lifted 3.5” on true actual 33” rt tires. Still get 21mpg and I’ve towed with it that way across the country moving for the military. I’m a ase master tech and just was sick of the lifter issues in the 5.3. Only thing Chevy needs to do is put the 10speed behind the 2.7

[@mattdagger1480]

Also got 27.1 mpg calculated at the pump on 2 100mile loops when it was bone stock.

[@kevinburton5323]

the 8 speed is a pretty good transmission behind these engines also

[@karlschauff7989]

@@kevinburton5323 After GM and Mobil 1 reformulated the transmission fluid in 2019 and addressed some design issues, the 8-speed greatly improved IMO. I prefer it to the 6L80. The big thing is having it serviced. GM insists it's fine to go 100k before service but don't follow that service schedule. Have the fluid and filter changed by 45k.

[@bobcook8576]

If they last 200k miles I will be a believer. It's a nice entry level step above a work truck.

[@TheGettyAdventures]

only time will tell! but I agree it is a nice step on the N/A v6's

[@kwt2000trucker]

It will last that long if you change the oil regularly, and the most difficult thing in the majority of people, NEVER accelerate the engine over 2000 RPMs, NEVER-EVER! Everyone except me, wants to arrive 4 seconds earlier to the next red light, stop sign or traffic backup, revving the engines too bad, 3000-4000 RPMs every stop and go. Let the vehicle speed up and shift gradually, no need to rush for a few seconds, the vehicle will last longer and of course, you will save gas

[@ericj810]

Buddys is at 209k. Pulls a 7400lbs camper 90% of the time. 2021 2.7 no issues, except for a brake sensor that was fixed around 80k.

[@dawsongranger4940]

@@kwt2000truckerrevving high on occasion is good for the engine because it prevents carbon buildup. And revs really don’t matter much so long as you aren’t flooring it. But you don’t have to slow traffic and drive it like a granny

[@cooshington5975]

@@ericj810 I was looking at a truck with this engine was kind of scared.

[@adamcrouch]

This would be a good comparison to the Ford Ecoboost 2.7L.

[@Cultofpersonality09129]

That engine wouldn’t last long enough to compare.

[@ajmedeiros77]

@@Cultofpersonality09129seriously! The 2.7 eco beast is so much better. And tuned, forget it!

[@TheGettyAdventures]

I'm trying to get my hands on one. would be an awesome comparison!

[@brettradecki]

@@ajmedeiros77eco boost 2.7 is such a dated motor in comparison. It’s not even close, the GM engine is vastly superior and makes more torque with 1 less turbo and 2 less cylinders. Easy choice.

[@jaylee8542]

Manufacturers install an inline, turbo 6 in semi and nobody bats an eye. Nobody ever says they can't believe its not a naturally aspirated v10, or implies the rig is less than. Gm introduces what is essentially the same concept in their half tons and guys shit their pants. Its a sewing machine and you aren't a real man because you didn't get a V8.

[@TheGettyAdventures]

I mean I was surprised how well it towed lol

[@jaylee8542]

@@TheGettyAdventures Haha It's fine. I really wasn't directing that comment at you personally becasue your reviews are always great. It's why I watch everyone you do. I said that because down here in the Midwest US where I live these guys would never be caught dead in a truck with that engine. And they make fun of you if even try to explain why it might be a nice drivetrain.

[@PapiDoesIt]

I've owned exactly one turbocharged engine and that was enough. Sure, it had V8 power, but it also had V8 fuel economy. Repair parts were a nightmare; my exhaust manifold cracked and a new one was $1500, not including labor. I'll just stick to a V8 for reliability.

[@filup7419]

I used to tow my RV with my 5.0 Coyote and while at the parks talking to other Ford owners with EcoBoosts, I always got better gas mileage. If we were racing up a hill, they'd smoke me but I'd get the better mileage. I feel that is the same with this little 2.7. With turbo's, you either get "eco" or "boost", not both. When towing, it's always under boost whereas the 5.0 is just cruising along. By comparison, I used to have a 3.0 LM2 Chevy diesel and while towing another car, I got 17 MPG. Currently, I have a Chevy with the LZ0 diesel but haven't towed with it yet (still get 30 MPG on the highway though). I'm curious to your thoughts and potential video on the eco vs. boost when it comes to the 3.0 diesel.

[@paulhunter9613]

Cruising along with the five oh screaming at 4000 rpm’s? That sounds relaxing..

[@webman1956]

I have a 2022 Silverado Custom with the 2.7 and 310 HP and before it I had a 2008 Ram 1500 with the 4.7 @310 HP and the Chevy would just bury that Ram easily in any test and then get 20 MPG average aposed to 15 MPG for the Ram. I only have 26000 miles on it and so far so good but will it go 250k plus miles? Only time will tell that.

[@sunmanav8]

I am an engineer (at GM) and have a 2022 Silverado with the L3B. I am preparing to purchase a travel trailer and a big consideration in that decision is the ability of this truck to tow whatever I end up buying. However, after speaking with an engineer who did the calibration on this engine and watching several KZbin videos, including yours, I'm convinced this thing is very capable of towing RVs up to at least 7500 LB. If it doesn't perform as expected I may move to the 3.0L LZ0 I6 diesel next year. The no-brainer solution is to just buy a 2500 with a Duramax but that's a completely different level of expense, and not a vehicle I would necessarily want as a daily driver. Thanks for reporting on your test.

[@BellaRosaCaneCorso]

If you’re an engineer for GM, you might wanna know that expanding the exhaust from the cat back to 3 inches, and putting in a KNN cold air intake, raises the horse, and torque A LOT. Your exhaust systems are so restrictive and with turbo charged engines, that’s a no no, but why did you guys make this without an intercooler?

[@dkaz974]

Honestly, guys this truck is sufficient enough for over 75% of the public.

[@Glipsnarp]

I have so many people try and compare it with the larger v8 trucks. "It wont tow my 5th wheel" This is a light duty truck.

[@porcupinepunch6893]

​@@Glipsnarp It's a 1500 not a semi truck 😂

[@toshayonguard4253]

Small engine’s that are turbocharged live very short lifespan……Master Mechanic here making Bank fixing all these baby turbo engines in all these pickups…..Turbo’s are for Racing engine’s not Street Vech’s because they have no Longevity. 🙄🙄🙄

[@dan43213]

I had a 2019 and now have the refreshed 2023 2.7. It's amazing what this motor will do. I've owned hemis and Ford's too

[@cmiles97x38]

Great review. I have a 2020 Silverado with the 2.7L 4 turbo which has less torque (348ft-lbs) that replaced a 2016 GMC 1500 with 4.3L v-6 work truck. I don't tow and drive in terrible traffic and was surprised to get the same 19.5 mpg as the V-6. The 4 turbo feels (not sounds) like a v-8. I am glad to see a tow test with the higher output version. These are built to save money when you don't tow which is like 90% of 1500 trucks these days. If you tow quite often why are you even in a 1500 instead of a 2500? For me going from v-6 to turbo 4 getting the same mpg while having similar to v-8 power is impressive. I also own a ford 2.7L twin turbo Edge. I tell folks it is eco or boost your choice. The mpg savings come under normal driving vs a V-8. The faster you drive or more you tow the less mpg. Also don't discount how much better the turbo forced air motors do at high elevations. Lastly V-8s are simple motors anymore. I was looking at Chevy's V-8, it is adversting something 15 different fuel modes going from 2 cylinder to 8 cylinder operation as required. Nope not simple anymore. Look for these used if they turn out to be reliable at higher mileage because most folks won't even consider a 4 cylinder turbo in a "full" sized truck. They should be much cheaper and great if you don't tow or carry heavy loads all the time.

[@MotionScientific]

The eco diesel 3.0 v6 gives you almost 30mpg those are real gas savings and much more torque not these dumb 2.7 liter turbos.

[@BVN-TEXAS]

For a second I I forgot you used KPH instead of MPH and was like 110 with that trailer,,, he is a madman.

[@markwitkop7022]

Actually, 10mpg is between 1 and 2mpg better than a v8 5.3. It is getting very GOOD mileage for that much weight. With no load it would be comparable to any 4banger. I tow a 6800 pound camper with my 5.3, and would be happy to average over 10mpg

[@sebastianpoe3799]

My 5.3 averages about 12-13mpg towing the boat.

[@LindsayPeters987]

This was a lot of fun to watch. The only guy i trust for my truck reviews

[@TheGettyAdventures]

Well thank you Lindsay!

[@frederickburns1739]

As a retired CAT&CUMMINGS KNUCKLE BUSTER little engines when BOOSTED generally are short lived. To many moving parts in that engine; translates to engine failure!?!?!?

[@tpangle85]

Im sorry but this thing is a ticking time bomb. Turbo, VVT, Sliding Cam. All just extra failure points. Overcomplicated never spells reliability. Simplicity is 100% reliability

[@gregktm8907]

I have put 5,000 miles on my 23 2.7 and love it. It tows my box trailer / 4,000 lbs with ease. If you can deal with the lack of v8 noise you will not be disappointed. I have read numerous complaints about the 8 speed trans. Mine however is very smooth and no matter what kind of driving I am doing seems to always be in the correct gear. Also does not hunt back and forth for gears. Tends to pick a gear and stay there. Even in hilly terrain. I can honestly say I do not regret purchasing the 2.7.

[@4vinylsound]

count and many times this guy says sewing machine.

[@kellycutler621]

Load up a small engine like that with Turbo's. How long do you think it was last? The Turbo's gonna never make a 100000 but that's just my opinion. That's just my opinion..

[@kgobey]

I just purchased a 2021 Silverado 1500 with the 2.7L Turbo to tow my 3000lb trailer and my 3000lb car with tools and spare wheels (just under 6800lbs) around the midwest and into KY, MO, OH, WI, IN, and MI... I live near the Chicago area. I don't have to worry about mountains, but there are plenty of massive long slope tows and lots and lots of traffic, poor roads, and shitastic weather. So far, I am blown away.

[@Stopvotingdemocrat]

have u done anything to the engine like installing a catch can ? i keep hearing the engine is gonna fill up with carbon. i have the same truck as u

[@johnnyBqwazy]

Great Vid!! U being a mechanic is the the heavier oil weight 5w 30 due it being a turbo 4 cylinder or other?

[@larrybarnett5910]

Funny how gm guys bashed ford for turboing a gas engine. Now look

[@bryanroof4031]

I have this motor in a 2023 Colorado, a huge improvement over the v6 That was in my 2019 Colorado. Pulls 4000 lb dump trailer much better. Runs like a diesel, best freeway driving is 31 mpg, usual mixed driving is 22-25. Hope it holds up for the long haul👍🏻

[@eddie95ee]

Hope you're still enjoying...I was thinking of doing the same. I'm still rolling the '19 no problems other than cosmetics but was flirting with a new one ?

[@davetrepse83]

Just bought one last week and boy im impressed !!! This small engine is incredible

[@Noslime]

I don’t care how it performs. If it doesn’t last me, it’s not worth anything. I just don’t see how it can have the longevity of the 5.3. It’s impossible, there is no replacement for displacement.

[@TheGettyAdventures]

I would agree the reliability would certainly be my #1 concern if I was going to buy it

[@RK-nr8qf]

I'd be more concerned with the cam and lifter problems of the v8 gas engines in the half-ton's than the longevity of this turbo 4. Only gas v8 in a gm truck that seems to be doing well is the 6.6 in the HD's.

[@Malachor8091]

I've always owned eight and six cylinder Chevy trucks and was reluctant to buy a four banger. But after watching a lot of reviews, I bought a 2024 Silverado with the 2.7 liter turbo. Im very pleasantly surprised at the power band. I didn't buy it for towing, but now I'm thinking of buying a small trailer for camping.

[@rogerramjet7567]

Just to let you know, FORD has had their version of this power plant for years !!! And it’s AMAZING!! About time GM woke up!! Pun intended 😀😀

[@mikedawson2158]

Fords 2,7 eco-boost will run rings around this engine. Also it will last twice as long. Watch his review of the 2.7 liter ford before you buy.

[@Solo-_-..]

Id buy the small engine turbo.. Owned a 2000 excursion V10 for 15 yrs 250,000 miles.. i do not tow or floor it everywhere i go..Should work fine for me

[@Warmachine-tu5zo]

Just don't buy a chevy unless you want lifter failure. Simple as that..

[@ridynh7923]

No doubt. I am living proof. Lifter and piston issues are one of GMs best kept secrets.

[@TheGettyAdventures]

Yaa they are certainly an issues for newer chevy engines

[@Warmachine-tu5zo]

@@ridynh7923 I had a 2021 trailboss 6.2 that had the lifter failure at 16k miles. What is mind blowing is they know its a major problem and they don't fix it. Like wtf is that? Thats horrible business practice.

[@waynejohnstone3685]

I have the 2020 version of this with 113k/km on it. I have a 14’ cargo trailer with a quad, dirt bike, snowmobile, one snowmobile in the bed one in the trailer etc. It performs well - tows better than my 2.7 f150 - but the Chevy is heavier so that might have something to do with it. Speaking just about the engine - it’s not as fast as my 2.7 f150 was but it’s super impressive and fun - like it’s alive! No problems passing even with loads. I average 19-21L/100km towing the trailer, and as good as 9 on the highway - average about 11.5 between fillups. It’s been flawless so far - but the caveat is that it does burn oil - about a litre every 10k. It’s on an oil watch thing with the dealer now, thankfully it’s a fleet truck plus I just ordered another. The 8 speed trans is absolutely horrible btw - between 1st and 3rd it misses shifts, clunky, slams into gears, etc. I’m told this is normal lol. FWIW the ford burned a little oil but the big thing (engine only) was all the seals on the engine needed to be replaced, they were weeping oil. This is getting long but the most annoying thing about the Ford was the drivers door refusing to close in cold weather. Even after the TSB and several repair attempts. That was unforgivable - cars have been around with doors over 100 years lol.

[@jaykanngiesser3454]

I can imagine the cylinder pressure, piston pin and rod bearing load at that power level and RPM..

[@ALMX5DP]

Would it be much different to other turbocharged engines? How would it compare to say the 3.0 Duramax?

[@rxwhat33]

On top of gm's already poor build quality and longevity.

[@troyg3439]

Forged internals, just send it.

[@mikestowe6136]

nope dont care ill take a non turbo gas engine anyday vs a ticking time bomb turbo 4cyl dont care what anyone says ill take a little less torque and keep the reliability

[@TheGettyAdventures]

I hear ya. the performance is certainly cool to see out of such a small engine but is it going to last.

[@cedriclorittssr4361]

I’m impressed! However, I still like my 5.7 liter Hemi Ram Classic 4x4😎👍🏾.

[@couleehiker403]

Thanks for this video! I came looking for a video on this motor, hoping to find something which showed a real world tow of a trailer. I wanted to see exactly what your were showing. What kinda RPM you'd get and how much shifting goes on during your tow. Your video was huge for me! I'm looking to replace my 2010 f150 5.4L. Which, going 110kph on cruise will downshift twice with every slight incline towing a trailer, which weighs less than the one your pulling. Can you tell me what octane you were running in that 2.7L. Thanks! Good timing too, I see you put this video out on 57min ago.

[@kylemj13]

The manual states to just use regular 87 octane, and that's all I've ever used in mine. I pull a 32' 7400lb travel trailer with mine, and it works flawlessly. We just did a trip from Michigan to Wisconsin and back, and averaged just over 10MPG, well over 1MPG better than when I had my 5.3. The "get up and go" while towing isn't quite there like the 5.3, but if I had to choose between the ability to get to speed faster, or the consistency of keeping speed while towing, I much prefer the 2.7 over the 5.3 that I had. Think of this engine like a mini diesel, it's made to make low end torque, not beat everything on the road at 0-60, and for that it does amazingly well. I've come to find that everyone bashing this engine has never even driven it.

[@davefornit6235]

I use the engine in my colorado .Regular 87 all the time 18 city /25 highway averages.I tow about 3000lb trailer with the redesign 8 speed when in tow mode at 70mph stays in 2200 rpm range all day maybe uses 2 gears going.up and down smaller hills,very few shifts about 13mpg while towing

[@larryw5429]

If I am paying 50 grand for a truck it better have v-8 with turbo lol!

[@realcdcruze3558]

The V8s will hit 250,000 miles east and this thing will need a new turbo every 50,000 miles.

[@TheGettyAdventures]

That is the golden question I think. will this engine hold up as the miles get put on it. so far people seem happy but only time will tell!

[@danielstrakos4774]

I’ve got a 2019 double cab with the 2.7 and I’m at 80k miles without a hiccup and I’ve seen more that a couple of my peers need engine replacements in their 5.3 engines so I’d say this little engine is built pretty well

[@erictownsend4236]

I would like to see you do the same run with a Ford 2.7 twin turbo v6 for comparison. You kept comparing it to the Ford 3.5 twin turbo v6, not a fair comparison.

[@TheGettyAdventures]

I'd love to do that. I just personally have not ran the 2.7 ecoboost on my route yet so I couldn't compare the 2!

[@ridewot]

What about the transmission temperature?? I know you can bring it up in the display 😊