There Are NO Su-57s in China!

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Go Fund Me for my first book! gofund.me/11d58d68 Join this channel to support it: kzbin.info/door/VDkfkGRzo0qcZ8AkB4TMuwjoin Support me on Patreon www.patreon.com/Millennium7 One off donation with PayPal www.paypal.com/paypalme/Millennium7star Join the Discord server discord.gg/kvuFyrxDez AFFILIATE LINK: Buy an Aircraft Model at Air Models! airmodels.net/?aff=173 ---------------------------- Ask me anything! Take part to the community Q&A clicking the link below! forms.office.com/r/LNPQtf3Tc0 -------------------- Visit the subreddit! www.reddit.com/r/Millennium7Lounge/ --------------------- All images and additional video segments contained in the Thumbnails and/or B-roll segments are used in strict compliance with the appropriate permissions and licenses required from the source and in accordance with the KZbin Partner Program, Community guidelines & KZbin terms of service.

[@LoveStoryMew]

Chinese journalists were shown a mock-up of the aircraft, which was delivered there disassembled on a cargo plane. There are videos and photos of how it was unloaded, and how journalists examined the layout. Everyone knows this except you - you have democracy in the West - you should only know what your propaganda tells you.

[@archangel7052]

They should make the mock up look immaculate if it's meant for close up viewing. They aren't doing a great job at it.

[@mustafakamalaaziz3021]

Please cover the Russian, Chinese & other Asian planes extensively. They are enough books on western aviation.

[@wahajhassan7307]

j35A and J20S review video please

[@alexandrebelinge8996]

I'm sorry ;-) I won't do it again

[@ДжонниДепп-к4о]

Самые страшные войны идут в чатах интернета. Убитых нет. Но все ранены в голову

[@ЕгорЕгоров-о1р]

😂👍

[@romanovvitaliy1731]

🤣🤣🤣👌

[@phunkracy]

😂

[@dandang182]

😆🤣🤣👍👍👍

[@pashapasovski5860]

I was late to Internet! I lived in NYC,spending every night Downtown, getting high like there's no tomorrow 😅 I moved Upstate with my new wife into a new house and discovered that things are different from what I remembered! I met some idiots during 20 years of drugs sex and alcohol 😅but I have never seen more morons than people sharing stupidity on KZbin!

[@yoppindia]

Those days are gone when news outlets can be trusted. each and every news has to be scrutinized for source, motive and target.

[@yoppindia]

@brucebaxter6923 I trust no one

[@urosjovanovic3142]

The problem is, those are all the info us, regular people, can get. And, obviously, they all lie 😂

[@arsic094]

@@brucebaxter6923 More than news outlets, for sure.

[@brucebaxter6923]

@@yoppindia You all must be trump supporters

[@gregmasters8558]

Its not surprising at all that the west weaponizes social media which they own almost all of it.

[@ernestoherreralegorreta137]

You're quite ostensibly an informed and unbiased professional. A rarity these days. Respect, and many thanks.

[@petep8828]

ostensibly?

[@ernestoherreralegorreta137]

@@petep8828 hahaha your comment made me check the english definition of ostensibly and I've just noticed that from the way it is worded (the 3 examples I got made use of the phrase "from appearances alone") it likely carries a different connotation from the one that its spanish analog ("ostensiblemente") carries, which is I believe the original one, that is, "ostensive" means to demostrate something by directly and openly showing it in an unequivocal manner. So, in spansih it has no bad connotations at all, and I assumed that would be the case for english too.

[@bjorntorlarsson]

There are actually quite a few of them in many different fields of knowledge. Never in Western MSM, of course, which is much more censored than "news" was in the 3rd Reich during WW2, if one compares Wochenschau (government's weekly news shown in cinemas back then) with MSM's reporting on the Ukraine war.

[@ernestoherreralegorreta137]

@@bjorntorlarsson IMO, Ward Carroll, who comes to mind, frequently has superb guests to his podcast, but he's certainly far from unbiased.

[@petep8828]

@@ernestoherreralegorreta137 yeah! this happens to me all the time, I can speak/ write Spanish but every now and then I like to check just in case.

[@solidsinek14]

Its crazy that people thought that a top-secret military plane would be open to view from up close to the public just like that. Thanks for the unbiased review

[@user-di5rm9ee1p]

It is funny because everyone is talking about rivets and so on but nobody noticed how Russians are hiding view of air intake.

[@NSAUSA]

Considering it's China that's well known for nicking plans and reverse engineer pretty much everything.

[@愛を込めてロシアから]

Do the Chinese really think that it is possible to assemble an airplane without rivets or screws?

[@林振华-t4v]

​@@愛を込めてロシアからyes, newer generation aircraft like 787 and A350 are glue together at some location, especially for carbon fibre Parts. And those newer generation aircraft dont use rivet as often, they use fasters look like rivet, but actually called hi-lite. Which using interference fit holes instead of clearance holes.

[@CarlSöderquist]

Well, normally in airshows it is the serial ones that are displayed.

[@yasvirid]

For a plane, that was made of Russian shovels and Ukrainian washing machine parts, it looks quite nice.

[@Tigr_Rus]

Лучше чем F-35!🤭

[@olexp9017]

Don't forget that the landing gear of Su-57 is using the tires stolen from Maidan!

[@Укрыниксы]

​@@olexp9017так Майдан создала Россия, чтобы добыть шины!?

[@pasha_gascogne]

​@@Tigr_Rus даже если он и был лучше что конечно же не так, то ф35 построили уже больше тысячи а Су 57... Ну он "существует" )

[@carlosandleon]

I mean the seams are kinda fucked but yeah it’s pretty

[@WTclips001]

Finally, someone who explains it, Glad other people got informed, instead of watching the "propaganda" nowadays. Earned a subscriber for that!

[@sinocare]

I saw that beast in the air dancing against gravity today.

[@commercio3564]

So it WAS in China?

[@ghulamanbia1486]

US pilot= Oh Mayday Mayday damn that plan is stalling and going down. Russian Pilot= Relax Comrade its just warming up.....❤❤❤❤

[@dianayu4453]

We have RT operating directly in China, they also call those prototypes Su-57s, because, well, nobody knows what a T-50 is, someone might even think that's a tank.

[@heyno3306]

lol

[@chenghu9911]

T50. Yeah, a world ii light tank with a small production number.

[@longshanks7157]

Anyone interested in aviation knows what a T-50 is

[@adillakandi.r]

Tbh Sukhoi naming for prototype aircraft is always started with T which many people confused over Russian tank which have same naming designation

[@ghosthunter806]

Basically… it’s almost Su-57. But a prototype.

[@ghostwhite1479]

Су-57 запрещено вывозить из страны. Даже самолет Путина в международных поездках сопровождают Су-35. И Россия сразу сказала, что в Китай направят всего лишь прототип. Реальный Су-57 можно увидеть только на авиашоу MAKS в Жуковском, или 9 мая над Москвой (но не всегда). Иногда они атакуют Украину с Черного моря, но на высоте 12000 метров его с моря не увидеть.

[@Пень1Бук1]

Да, потому что есть что скрывать, особенно систему стелс от РЭБ. Но! А как же его сопровождение и сбитие с-70? Он не высоко был и недалеко от фронта. И участие в Сирии?

[@cujbaion1]

Mulțumim! Au căzut două drone mici și se ceartă lumea că fiind atît de mici n-ar avea autonomie pentru a ajunge pînă în Moldova. 🤔

[@ghostwhite1479]

@@Пень1Бук1 В Сирии Су-57 не был. У страха глаза велики!

[@ghostwhite1479]

@@cujbaion1 Tu esti moldovian sau roman?

[@ВМФ_СУ-57М]

​@@ghostwhite1479был, даже видео есть

[@lagrangewei]

anyway the 2nd plane that is delivered by cargo plane is for static display. this way the plane is always available for display and VIP can check them out.

[@Rusich945]

the second su57 is a mock-up

[@pinocleen]

You have better information or just haven't been paying any attention what Millennium 7 has said?

[@The_Prince_Of_Crows]

Yes the second was one of three non flying prototypes from the T-50 series

[@НиколайНикакоюс-л2ь]

Этот мужик - редкий алмаз аналитики. Снимаю шляпу перед этим джентльменом.

[@Атланти-ш9и]

Я там был рядом.Там гвоздями все прибито и на саморезах.Двигатели от стиралки,а сверху крышка от унитаза.Но как летает.Чудо!😊😊😊

[@VladK-1]

Секрет в стиральной машине в сердце самолёта. В режиме отжима на 1200 оборотах в минуту она работает как антигравитационное устройство, позволяющее совершать самолёту все эти немыслимые манёвры. Можете проверить дома - если попробуете сесть на стиралку во время отжима, почувствуете небывалую лёгкость!

[@Пень1Бук1]

Забыли упомянуть кондиционеры для задува воздуха...ой, или это нельзя было разглашать

[@nameless1010100]

👍😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@AlexanderBasov]

@@VladK-1 Всё СВО для того чтобы украсть секретные Украинские антигравитационные стиралки.

[@jet-nx1me]

哈哈哈😂

[@murgel2006]

Frankly, I don't care if the plane is truly stealth, a Gen 5 or a Gen 4,5 aircraft. What I care about is that this is, in my eyes, the sexiest plane the Russians have built so far. It's the Su-57's looks I care about, not so much the tech. Sure I love tech as well and it is more important than looks in combat, but IMO aircraft should be good-looking 😉

[@zetareticulan321]

"If it looks good, it will fly good" -Bill Lear

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Wasn't it Marcel Dassault?

[@olexp9017]

It was Tupolev: "Хорошо летать могут только красивые самолёты". Doesn't matter who said it first, it makes sense.

[@ObjectiveAnalysis]

Did you see what it can do in the air? I’ve never seen an F-35 do that 😅

[@Vanyushka88]

Мне нравится как выглядят русские самолеты, мне нравятся как выглядят американские самолёты, но не нравятся китайские, скопированные с русских и американских, да простят меня китайцы 😊

[@NewAgeRanger]

People need to understand that at some of these public military displays they will only show you what they want to show you. If anybody is to deny Russian engineering, technology, and capabilities they are in denial.

[@MultiVeeta]

People need to understand that west and east technology have been fighting for real in the Middle east for over half a century with Israel v Syria and Iran v Iraq etc. and the Russian aircraft have had their ass kicked over and over.

[@JohnFrumFromAmerica]

Yet Russia a much bigger country than Ukraine has been only making marginal gains for over a year.

[@markoivanisevic2168]

@@JohnFrumFromAmerica, tell me my friend how many gains did US have in Vietnam? Oh wait, US lost war in Vietnam. :) Now go and check how big was Vietnam in 1960s and 70s. Dont write stupid things.

[@ariel_kuznetsova_]

​@@markoivanisevic2168not to mention the US dropped around 7.6 million tons of bombs in Vietnam, which is more than the 2.7 million tons dropped during World War II across all theaters.. 2 million tons into a country next door.. Laos I'm surprised the US didn't win, if anything that alone should have won the war but apparently not?

[@vasilije94]

@@JohnFrumFromAmerica That is so unrealistic to say. What did USA do in Vietnam against people with barely any aviation? What did USA do in Afganistan? Country with literally no planes and basically no antiair weapons? Oh that is right, they run away. Ukraine is modern and big country with decent airforce at the start of the war and great air defence in general. Also lets not forget that entire NATO is sending all the possible new weapons to them monthly, including information support which is the most important in war. So lets not talk bullshit here. They are progressing at a slower rate. That is modern warfare for you especially in Ukraine where its just flatland. You go ahead and push a open field with mines and drones on every step and where a single soldier can take out the most advanced tanks. This is not talibans with shitty rpgs and no info, hiding in caves from which USA lost btw. This is a modern army with every possible support from NATO.

[@ЕгорЕгоров-о1р]

господа специалисты , на выставке учавствовал не серийный истребитель а один из прототипов т-50 соответственго у него видны все винты которые многих веселят , что умеет ,какое покрытие самолёта и как выглядит настоящий серийный су 57 никогда не покажут

[@Im4x4]

пусть поумничают.

[@ОбычныйЧеловек-щ7м]

Ты видос вообще смотрел? Ровно про это в видео прямым текстом и говорится.

[@ЕгорЕгоров-о1р]

@ОбычныйЧеловек-щ7м вы это расскажите тем кто в комментариях эту тему обсасывают

[@weaselgunsru]

Ну на самом деле и F-22, и F-35 все в винтах и заклёпках, есть много фотографий на тему того, как винты на них техники крутят высокотехнологичным коловоротом за 1000 долларов.

[@mustafakamalaaziz3021]

The Russians are aware of Chinese replication ability and they're sensible. You're right on.

[@juliap.5375]

Russia never aware about this. Few examples: - Russia for free built for China over 600 of heavy industrial factories, the roots of modern Chinese industry; - Russia helped to China to get nuclear weapons; - Russia send own MiG team to China where they helped to develop J-20 (former MiG 1.44 project); - Russia helped to China with space program, from space ship to rockers and space station; - in 2019 Putin confirmed, that Russia building for China early warning system about missiles attack. Such kind of system have in whole world only US and Russia. - in 2017 China joined to Russian lunar program and Russia opened for China the most classified own project - nuclear reactor for space and space tug; exactly from China sources was leaked photos of prototype of that tug which Russia demonstrated to China (Russia not demonstrated it even for own internal auditory). - China was first nation which got just developed and secret S-400, for decade before of rest.

[@SometimesIamNot]

China has J-20 and J-35, which are both better than Su-57, you live in the past

[@SometimesIamNot]

@@juliap.5375and China expended half a million Chinese soldiers in Korea war to get those awareness, during Cold War . Do you consider that?

[@deauthorsadeptus6920]

​@@SometimesIamNotYeah, these things got long arms. In theory at least. We don't know how capable all of them are however, just an educated guess at best.

[@LP18888]

@@juliap.5375 Stop spreading lies, Russia only helped China to build the factories was at the cost of half a million Chinese lives lost in Korea. The Soviet experts pulled out within a very short time too. Soviets never helped the Chinese with nuclear weapons, Mao asked Stalin and Stalin simply laughed at him. The Chinese nuclear program was started by an American trained scientist. Russia never helped the Chinese with the space program either stop taking credit on everything. Plus the J20 is way more superior than any of Russian shitty migs.

[@chadbernard2641]

Thanks for video. The second fighter is static mock up it was numbered 50-6-2 originally and was mock up of second 5 prototypes for static testing. The second 5 have different dimensions improved structure were +9G as first 5 were 6G limited,and made with different materials. Only 50-11 was brought close to serial production level. It makes sense to send early prototype as the intelligence ablel to be gathered is next to nothing.

[@Diocilis]

50-11 стал эталоном для серии. Основное отличие его от 50-6 - полный комплекс бортовой электроники. По планеру самолеты идентичные. А вот 50-1, 50-4 и 50-6 (11) отличаются внутри очень сильно.

[@WJV9]

I love your conversations with Otis, your knowledge of aircraft and weapon systems is top notch. BTW I am a former McDonnel Aircraft engineer who worked on F4's decades ago.

[@marcgatto9675]

The flying 'Mule' version was the perfect jet to send to the airshow. Brilliant strategy tbh.

[@joeblack5393]

Am i the only one who loves/arppreciates the Otis bits? Otis is cool 😎

[@cbhlde]

Same here! ;)

[@NJ-wb1cz]

Otis confuses me because Otis is supposed tobe an elevator, not a vacuum cleaner

[@lavenderlilacproductions]

I wish my robot vacuum would call me. :(

[@olexp9017]

For me personally today's Otis was the most entertaining 😅

[@danwelterweight4137]

He is the star of the show🤣

[@ahmedberrebha]

حقيقة لو كانت السوخوي 57خردة لما خاف منها الخبراء الأوروبيون والأمريكيين

[@IamnotShawn777]

In a nutshell: It's a T-50 and a static model Edit: There is a god damn flying T-50 and a another static model

[@Coyote27981]

Not a model, cause it was a real T-50 prototype. Just not an active plane.

[@IamnotShawn777]

@Coyote27981 I said T-50 AND A MODEL

[@tonykriss1594]

@@IamnotShawn777 That model is a static prototype. Not every prototype flies.

[@IamnotShawn777]

@@tonykriss1594 bro, there are 2 T-50s, one is the static model, and the other is the flyable version......

[@toxickilljoy9037]

​​@@IamnotShawn777 pretty sure there's more than that. There were several pair of t50s all over the web a long time ago that people thought were su57 but were actually t50s, because the operational su57 was still a baby and they had maybe 5. So they built more t50 because it's easier to test the test plane and update the real one accordingly so you dont accidentally crash one of the few models that will take years to replace lol their supply chain might suck but they still try to mitigate that

[@cannonfodder4376]

It's a shame that a KZbinr has better journalistic rigor and ethics these days than actual news media. All the more reason to support you instead of these propaganda outlets. A most succinct explainer video.

[@Hyperionid]

Thanks for clarifying these details, it is mindbogling to see how respectable news outlets distort things to fit "the narrative".

[@Iliya117]

US is the last country who should point out problems with 5th gen plane production. Given the whole F35 debucle. Remember russia is at war and has most sanctions in history and still manages to build planes.

[@FloofyMinari]

Debacle?

[@bjorntorlarsson]

And nuclear submarines, and destroyers, and surveillance satellites, and hypersonic missiles and so on. You know, Russia is just Nigeria with nukes. (And the EU is Nigeria without nukes, and without oil). And US Generals' IQ is so low that they call it HQ.

[@M16_Akula-III]

They have over 1000 F-35s already produced.

[@denxero]

@@M16_Akula-III lol

[@mah_daddy]

@@M16_Akula-III lmao. 1.5 trillion dollar fancy toy. nothing else.

[@martinabowm1786]

Crazy how many details you know and what the differences are!

[@nilswedin8480]

Yes it is strange.

[@Burboss]

Its called "common sense" and "unbiased approach".

[@jachtk893]

​@@nilswedin8480 there are full of those information about how T50 prototype and production are different on Chinese social media (which is rarely seen on X Facebook or something)

[@vincenttay2812]

Empty tin

[@Roar-nq2th]

I hope your health keep you flying for years to come..

[@mohammadalam9936]

Yah, there is no su 35 either. No no no, Russia doesn't have any flying jets either, only shovels.

[@M16_Akula-III]

To be fair, China has like 24 already

[@olexp9017]

​@@M16_Akula-III I would put it the other way "At least the F-35 is not made in China" 😂

[@M16_Akula-III]

@@olexp9017 I don't get this context. What I was referring to is that there's already 24 Su-35S (Su-35SM, or Su-35, usually that's what the Chinese media call them) in PLAAF inventory.

[@olexp9017]

​@@M16_Akula-III The context is very simple. No wonder China built more of something than Russia did when China makes 90% of stuff sold in the USA. On a contrary Russia went a British way of a "service" economy.

[@M16_Akula-III]

@@olexp9017 I... see..?

[@Mirpurmad]

armchair warriors and Internet generals will never lose a chance to mock other countries when they get a chance. specially when its anon Western country they dont like,. so the controversy of rivets and screws was never going to be ignored on the social media battle space. but Millennium 7 is not one of those internet generals he is an unbiased but well educated and well informed presenter who discusses modern aviation in such easy manner that it makes me believe that I know modern aviation stuff. lol

[@tigerpjm]

Well... not really. Anyone with a moderate understanding of the aircraft on display can see that it is poorly built. It takes someone with deeper knowledge to clarify why that aircraft is on display and how it doesn't reflect the final production version. Basically, chill out. Not everyone has bad intentions...

[@koskok2965]

@@tigerpjm Well, if you think about it a little harder, you'll realize you're wrong, provided we're both referring to the segment of the population with the following attributes: -> Have successfully undergone basic education ( didn't just scratch their balls from pre-school to high-school, graduated high school, have a healthy interest in learning ) -> Have undergone no formal education on engineering, aeronautics, military tech, military science and geopolitics. -> Have particular Interest in the above fields and read up on them on their own ( through news articles, technical reports/documents, forums, YT ,etc ). -> Practice critical thinking and are able to mute their emotions and biases when analyzing/digesting information. -> Are well aware of the existence of propaganda, the motivations for its spread and understand the principles/methods behind its operation. So, for the kind of people described above, the process of proof-reading of any material contains plenty of "failsafes" against disinformation, in the form of questions and anti-arguments and it's mostly in the search for contradictions. In our case, Here's a very simple line of reasoning one would follow to reach the conclusion that he may be reading pure BS when coming across the kind of article mentioned in the video: -> I've read a plethora of accounts of both its designer/manufacturer and the client/end user saying this thing was explicitly designed as a top-of-the-line, VLO multirole fast jet. -> I've seen a lot of material ( photos/footage ) of other Russian aircraft in production, not even VLO, from the same manufacturer, that have a higher build quality than this one. -> I've read that these particular specimen I'm looking at are prototypes, one of which is not even operational at this point ( it's a static display model ). -> I've consumed enough miltech content to know that initial prototypes can just serve as throwaway platforms to perform unit or system-wide tests on. -> I've seen a popular clip of one of these things flying casually high over Ukrainian territory and nothing happened to it. No way UA has no long range AD left to even spook it . -> I've also consumed enough military affairs content to know that nations generally don't like serving intel on their latest and greatest to the enemy on a silver platter, and may even go so far as to present neutered/botched specimens of that stuff to avoid exposing the true state of their tech. -> So since this model is meant to be an expensive, high-tech VLO and is produced by a corporation that has a lot of other, cheaper and lower-tech good aircraft to show, how can a specimen of it be that poorly built, especially when I've seen one of them perform as intended with my own eyes? -> What's more likely? The manufacturer conning their client to the point of self-humiliation while their track record and public evidence suggests otherwise, or could it be that the Russians wouldn't like to expose a serial production specimen of their best fast jet to everyone in public, including their greatest adversaries? In that case, would I put it above the notoriously sensationalistic, politically biased and unreliable media to wrongly accuse the manufacturer of poor quality standards? Are there any hints within the article suggesting the author is heavily biased ( e.g. extensive negative coverage of the political side of things, affiliations to political adversaries and competitors of the manufacturer and country of origin of the machine )? Is the journal itself politically biased ( high percentage of previous articles have similar bias and similarly biased authors, journal is affiliated to political entities )? So that's part of the reasoning of the previously described skeptical miltech enthusiast, that takes place in their mind in fractions of a second contrary to the time it takes one to read their thought process out loud, because you know, habit and adeptness at the vetting of information.

[@tigerpjm]

@@koskok2965 TL;DR

[@fredmdbud]

Um - this guy is an armchair warrior and internet general.

[@tigerpjm]

@@koskok2965 TL;DR

[@aquilarossa5191]

One thing is certain. The pilot executed a stunning display flight. "But airshow tricks are no use in combat!" BVR rules? Is the West really going to make that mistake again? The mistake of thinking the merge is a thing of the past, i.e., only BVR matters. There's an ex US fighter pilot with a channel. Lemone or something. He managed to be more or less honest about it and explained why that extreme agility is useful in combat. There's another reason he did not mention. The recent Su-34 evading a Patriot missile recording. Any other fighter bomber probably would've been shot down, but the Su-34 retains some of the Su-27's agility, so he managed to outfox the fox. The point being that a Su-57 being chased by a missile launched BVR or from ground would have a better chance of evading than most, so the maneuvers should not be dismissed as not being effective in combat. P.S. It would not surprise me if the instigators of the 'rivets' talk were sock puppets having a stir. The sock puppets have form playing that game.

[@LeonardTavast]

CW Lemoine is the youtuber you're thinking of.

[@robertsneddon731]

Lemoine was an RIO, the back-seat weapons and systems officer in F/A-18s (aka Talking Baggage). He was pilot-trained but not a command pilot. As for the Su-34 evasion of Patriots, that's the newsworthy survivor bias recording of an aircraft that didn't get shot down when engaged by ground-based air defences. The pilot was warned of the Patriot launches by EW aircraft flying overwatch, aborted the mission, dropped his external weapons and fuel tanks and turned around and ran away full throttle without any airshow tricks and split-S cobras to slow him down and allow the missiles to catch up. A missile can turn at 40g and more, always able to get inside the envelope of a manned aircraft limited to manoeuver at 9gs or less. They don't fly missiles at airshows though.

[@AmericanDiscord]

​@@robertsneddon731 Not true. Pilot engaged in evasive maneuvers pulling high G during evasion as indicated by the released audio.

[@shaider1982]

​@@robertsneddon731 I think you are thinkung of Ward Caroll: a former F14 RIO. CW (Mover) was a F16 pilot.

[@Cor_Netto]

You don’t defeat bvr missiles with supermanouverability. You defeat them by running away and dragging the missile from its flight path, eating its kinetic energy. Doing a cobra against a patriot missile is the dumbest thing a pilot could do.

[@lagrangewei]

0:44 the Su-57 is so advanced it has optic camouflage led panel that can project your forehead into the plane, given its enemy a heart attack. 10/10 best fighter!

[@randomwarehouse4702]

Oh my god I think I've witnessed a murder

[@imepriimek398]

You must have realy good INSIDER nformation.. probably even better than Americans?!? Right?? Right?? No, you just fantasizing about this useless piece of crap.

[@TwoThreeRight]

Can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic. Su57 is behind the Chinese and western technology

[@kilosierraalpha]

Never clicked play so fast. Thank you M7. Your coverage of combat air planes is the best on YT!

[@jawad_kazmi]

This is one of very few channels where i know that I can hit like on a video as soon as I start watching

[@nevidimka6353]

My thought is that, the russians didnt want to fly in a production quality finish aircarft thorugh china airspace to allow the sneaky chinese to train all thier Low frequency radar and whatever anti stealth radar to learn the radar signature or how to track the SU 57. so they brought in a prototype with poor quality stealth. They brought the better quality one via air transport so the chinese cant train thier radars on it .Genius move from Russia!. 🙂

[@daimonlord79]

It has no stealth" finish" no coating no absorption panels on the engine covers it is the 4th of about 9 prototypes

[@hudojnyck2117]

Да. Это не полноценная версия СУ-57 и об у нас, в России уже сообщалось. Тем не менее даже эта версия самолёта - лучшее, что когда-либо поднималось в воздух за пределами России

[@Sovoko65]

What's the new ?West has been fighting pr war with Russian since 1st century 😂 Su 57 is brilliant fifth generation fighter. Lots of improvement has been made since 2022, and next year with new engine will be even better.

[@bamakoo]

I was sure that something was off with this plane at the airshow... Russian aircraft manufacturers are usually good at making planes. Now I have the explanation, thanks ! You have my subscription

[@MrXperx]

We want more videos about the Su 57.

[@professorjackalope]

Seriously informative and the return of Otis! My man! Thank you as always and we all hope you're feeling better. Best aviation channel on the platform(sorry Alex)

[@AtomicKepler]

The serial number on the SU-67 was 054, and was blue. Blue were pre-production models, and from the serial number it is shown that it is a T-50, 4th flying prototype. T-50 is the prototype designation of the Su-57.

[@user-pl7ed6ci6l]

Quick frankly, there is nothing wrong with Russian weapons being seen as "rough", their stuffs are always known to be rough and tough, just like their AK47, rough, tough, simple to produce, use and maintain, those are great qualities for those that know how to appreciate them.

[@catadoxas]

whats rough about a russian phased array radar though? an infantery rifle has different requirements

[@ijoseluis]

You are not an amateur, Sir.

[@the_black_douglas9041]

the Otis bit at the start had me laughing so hard 😂😂😂😂

[@Tigr_Rus]

Первый самолет - прототип для участия в авиашоу, второй самолет - для демонстрации зрителям на выставке!😉

[@Sanga_boy]

That’s how far off these media and critics are, analyzing a raccoon as a lion 😂😂😂

[@charlieperaltaf]

Funny that the people making this articles, are from countries that are 100 years away from making their own stealth fighter, or from countries that are worsening their debts, by buying american ones.

[@mr.anonymous1087]

Su-57 is so beautiful!!

[@mitkoliondar1]

I was waiting for your view on the topic ^.^

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Thank you!

[@grasworxTTGameplan]

Sometimes I question @millennium7historytech bias and leanings...but this is yet another video that proves his sources and analysis are always based on the most up to date FACTS.

[@golmgolm]

Everyone says that your videos are informative, balanced, and generally awesome, but I want to mention a specific detail: the intro music, I like it very much

[@Jack2Japan]

Sorry we had to “twist your arm” to get another Su-57 video. Nonetheless, very informative. (Good work Otis!)

[@alessiosem2238]

It was clearly a prototype and whoever pointed out the bad assembly quality of the aircraft present at the Chinese Airshow is both a western propagandist or an utter incompent. Btw subscribed because i like that you inform instead of putting fake news. Well done sir.

[@rogerthat4545]

😆 our prototype is stealth, "trust me bro"

[@alessiosem2238]

@@rogerthat4545 I don't answer trolls so pi$$ off.

[@alessiosem2238]

@@rogerthat4545 Go back to your cave troll.

[@alessiosem2238]

@@rogerthat4545 i don't trust any of you.

[@rogerthat4545]

@@alessiosem2238 I'm not the one pretending to have built a "stealth" fighter

[@jtkrpm1]

At least it's a real jet. Unlike the Ghost of kiev

[@hudojnyck2117]

😆😆😆😆😆👍

[@CROM-on1bz]

I don't know where you do your daily walk but it seems like a very nice place. Walking is a great exercise for your health, keep it up.

[@MarkVrem]

let us be real; its an airport, LOL

[@CROM-on1bz]

@@MarkVrem Dying of laughter, it seemed so calm.🤣🤣

[@houssamassila6274]

This time the intro is extremely well done. This is something I can get behind. Excellent video as usual! Bravissimo!

[@StrictlyDrift]

Great research and explanation! Thanks for setting the record straight! Military bits or not, it's such a beautiful aircraft.

[@SilentioMortus]

Thank for breaking down such mediocre and stupid propaganda.

[@ailinofaolin8897]

People banging on about rivets and build quality I was more interested in the skill of the T-50 pilot at the Chinese airshow it was incredible to watch.

[@92HazelMocha]

Iirc that was Sukhoi's main test pilot, there's pictures of him at the giftshop buying models of the J20 and J35

[@Пень1Бук1]

62 year old pilot

[@ChrisZ901]

And the Chinese audience were super impressed when they saw the falling leaf maneuver.

[@omarsv9047]

Resulta muy agradable y esperanzador, ver que hay divulgadores (aunque muy pocos) que se apegan estrictamente a publicar solo informaciones objetivas e imparciales. Lo felicito. Usted es uno de los pocos que lo hacen.

[@Brocambro1]

Why are you wasting all this energy trying to explain to these haters, down inside in their soul after watching that aircraft fly and demonstrate what it could do, it was clear that there is no fighter plane out there in the world that could fly and pull off the kind of stunt that the Su 57 did, just looking at how the crowd was rushing to collect autographs from that skilled pilot was a plebicite in itself on who is the real boss.

[@kenwu6174]

The Chinese internet is also filled with admiration for the Su-57’s flight performance. I find it hard to understand Russia's approach. They sent their top pilot to showcase their most advanced fighter abroad, yet provided him with an unrefined prototype. They could have reduced public scrutiny of the details by refusing close-up displays, but instead, they chose to allow it.

[@92HazelMocha]

It wasn't their "top pilot" it was Sukhoi's main test pilot who has probably had more time in the T50 than anyone else.

[@OcelotSF]

so chinese wouldn't read it's radar spectre

[@daimonlord79]

LIke they care what some morons that cannot even tell a T 50 from a SU-57 they care about nobody being able to scan and check up close and try to copy the real one they are in war not parades and shows like the chinese.

[@BlackMetalVengeance]

I've heard speculations that the due to it being a prototype, the T50 has less safety restrictions compared to serial production units that allow stunts like what was shown at Zhuhai. Take that with a grain of MSG though.

[@daimonlord79]

@@BlackMetalVengeance No it most certainly not, it has no combat modules on and only 3 of the 5 radars the front and 2 side view ones. This is 70% at most of the abilities of the combat ready in manauvering and climb rate and even thrust ratio.

[@nonsequitor]

When it's abbreviated to Su, it's *an* Su-57 not *a* Su-57. One of the rare cases of English following the French rule of "whatever sounds right" (although I'm sure there's an actual rule somewhere). If you're saying Sukhoi though, it would indeed be *a* Sukhoi. Anyway, thanks for yet another insightful and interesting video delivered with near flawless English grammar. Most Americans could learn a lot from your content 🙌

[@fredmdbud]

If you speak each letter - "ess yu", then it's "an", yeah. If you pronounce the abbreviation "Su" (which is the Russian practice), it is "a". Similar to the French liaison - l'homme vs le garcon.

[@olexp9017]

A Su-57 but an An-24.

[@NickZhukov]

I saw this exact jet at MAKS airshow 10+yrs ago, in time of its very first open public flight. It is T-50-04. I have videos with it

[@basilhanas8453]

I bet these bloggers would also rant why taxidermy of an animal looks nothing like real one...

[@JoJo-vm8vk]

4:13 Bro, the standard practice for a demo team is that the spare aircraft is also flying, it doesn't come as spare parts in cargo aircraft!

[@UfoManiacs.]

Muitas fontes de notícias ocidentais e mesmo o público anti-Rússia acham que a realidade se alterará com notícias falsas. Isso é muito infantil.

[@Vito_Tuxedo]

I'm sorry that I'm not currently in a position to support this channel financially, but the content certainly deserves it. Always first-rate, well-researched material. Thanks for continuing the great work! - Vito 😎

[@russellk.bonney8534]

The Russians trolled y'all. They sent an early version prototype.😂😂😂😂

[@manganim197]

Thanks for the updates

[@jamesmandahl444]

Why didn't you mention the engines shown? Some controversy as many at first thought it was izd30 but was a new 177s1 as opposed to the 117s1. Still has the same thrust but 6000 hours between major overhauls. Supposedly the 177s for native su-35 upgrades will have maximum thrust boosted to something like 15000 kg of thrust as opposed to 14500 kg of thrust. Also the 177s1 has some izd30 internals as well as the izd30 nozzle.

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Correct.

[@Rek1emMScar]

Do you have a link? i want to read more about it.

[@tunisiandom9318]

@@Rek1emMScar there's nothing official to read. UEC (conglomerate in Russia making aircraft engines) announced they will display a 5th gen engine in China and everybody though it will be the izd. 30 (it is the only known 5th gen engine in development in Russia). when they displayed it they gave it the designation 177S. there are 3 speculations: 177S is the izd. 30 Very unlikely since, it's not ready yet for Russia itself. 177S is a new design from scratch. more likely but still unlikely, because Russia doesn't have a competing 5th gen design to develop a new engine for. but a new design could be interesting for export (China ndia and Turkey are planning to build new aircraft and a ready powerful engine may interest them). Most likely is the 177S is an intermediate design based on 117 (AL-41F1) with some sprincles of izd. 30 magic, that is made for export and upgrading Russian 4th gen fighters in the future.

[@Rek1emMScar]

@@tunisiandom9318 did you mess up in the middle? Why would Russian want a new engine when Al41 its already really powerful for Su-27/su35 Aircraft. Its around 35k Thrust.. Unless they want more efficiency engine it don't make sense. Ftr Last time i read about Al-51 it was making around 40k thrust. i know that they bring 3 engine to China. A new variant of the engine on Yak130 and AL51 with and old al31 for comparation. Also are you trying to imply that Su-57 its not good enough? Seriously?

[@daimonlord79]

It is the new engine variant of the upgraded SU-35S tsame engine less fuel consumption more thrust better climb rate and range with less heat signature.

[@10percenttrue]

Loved this. Humour, insight, and entertainment.

[@Rek1emMScar]

For what i know.. T-50-7 has never flew. Its was a System integration mock up.

[@audas]

Thanks for this - great video. Learned a lot.

[@borism4629]

You never disappoint .

[@TheCokoll]

Those engines belong to the same family. I think it is pretty easy to deliver the new variant temporarily fitted with a old engines. For example, in soviet times last production runs of Tu-16 badger were to be fitted with rd-16-15 engines instead of older am-3. Engines never got to mass productions, and the last Badgers were built with enlarged air intakes, but delivered with the old engines

[@chosen7127]

If truly they ridicule the russian plane they are not a good host. You don't ridicule your guest. That's a sign of bad manners.

[@bromazepam781]

No one argues against the fact that Chinese are uncultured. Scratch that fake politeness on the surface and you'll find a really nasty nation. Trust me, as a Serbian I know how arrogant and rude they can be.

[@ChrisZ901]

uh you gotta understand that it is comments on the Internet, not any official statement,right?

[@finderskeepers7293]

Thank you for the video & telling us which aircraft actually went to China. This is a very important piece of information that clarifies a lot of doubts that arose from online discussions about the Russian jet and its quality.

[@martinabowm1786]

Otis on the phone! Love the idea! Has your mobile also got a name? 😅

[@anes1240]

The best aviation Channel I seen keep it up

[@tildarusso]

Excellent as always!

[@yunusemreselcuk2128]

Yes sir, I have found the video interesting and informative. Thanks for your effort and always being objective.

[@mcal27]

Fantastic Gus!! Put your tin hat on.. no doubt NAFO comments inbound.. even though they are quieter and abit sullen these days in my experience 😉

[@markyuresko1346]

MiG-29, similar experience for attending first U.S. flight display/showing (Kalamazoo, Michigan) in 1990. Two USSR MiG-29 ( one single seat and one dual KUB) along with a loaded up Il-76(?). Was allowed to inspect from about 2 or 3 meters away and talk to crew and support. The aircraft looked either worn from flight displays (I believe they came in by Alaska) or early builds and build quality was not up to western appearance standards but, they did present a (hate to say it) dazzling display but, later to my dismay had been informed that all “control limiters” were removed and those maneuvers were “reportedly” banned in the pilots syllabus.

[@Rusich945]

su57 is superior to f22, it is a ready-made base for 6th generation.

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

I am not so sure of the 1, definitely it is not the case for 2

[@Rusich945]

@@Millennium7HistoryTech your opinion in this case does not coincide with reality. 1 Su57 exceeds the F22 in range, the Su57 radar sees 2 times further, and 360 degrees, the Su57 simultaneously fires up to 16 missiles, its missiles fly further (up to 400 km), it takes off from the ground (large wheels). 2 the su57 already has elements of the 6th generation. Su57 works with a flight of S-70 UAVs, AI performs anti-missile maneuvers (super maneuverability), identifies priority targets and can attack them, Su57 can fly without a pilot, it returns to base and lands. the su57 has a defense complex (lasers and digital electronic warfare), the su57 navigates without reference to navigation satellites, the range of encrypted toposphere communications is more than a thousand kilometers, the engine is multi-mode without an afterburner. su57 only lacks a photon radar, which the Russians are now successfully developing, a working prototype has been created

[@davidwood2205]

The Felon has an RCS as large as an F-18. How is that superior to the Raptor?

[@m16-a2]

@@davidwood2205 according to whom?

[@Darkmouse20001]

​@@Rusich945A little bit like the T-14, most of that is BS and will be discovered soon enough.

[@MyTakeOnLife001]

Very informative video as always

[@shaider1982]

Ok, so it was really a prototype that the Chinese were picking on.

[@deauthorsadeptus6920]

Eh, as if they didn't have to rework the entire plane to fit their components anyway. Su57 airframe isn't really worth much, but electronics...oh they sure want to take a loooooong look at those. And receive inspiration. And i doubt early prototype got anything, but weight imitators or outdated components at best.

[@RoyHobbs-f4v]

... the exceptional-level of interest in the performance of the SU-57 by the Chinese... tells you a considerable amount about the performance of the J-35.

[@frommordorwithlove4844]

Yes, and also chips from a washing machine and shovels😊

[@gheaflorin]

even if it's not the lot with the new engines... imo (i could be wrong) it makes sense to have more Su57 platform up and running for training the new pilots on the equipment

[@JustinTanKH]

please dont do propaganda.... please... just the facts else we'll loose all respect otherwise, much respect and much thanks for the info n vid!!!!!

[@termorey]

You always can create airplane now, use it if extremely need it, and swap engine after in a short time

[@soothsayer2406]

Please do another Su57 video...Feed us!

[@draskodrasko2519]

Maaaate! Fascinating content. I didn't ask for it..loved it 🎉

[@militarymadness9133]

legit channel

[@Dankas10]

Thank you for this informative video.

[@alessiobaccetti2235]

interesting as usaual

[@dexlab7539]

Intro was hilarious 😂😂. Well done

[@aboaiub]

Su-57 demo reaction maybe? please?

[@shashwatshukla-430d5]

THIS SU57 IS PROTOTYPE VERSION IN CHINA

[@hoghogwild]

T-50.