Thank you for the shoutout! And I wish you the best of luck when it comes to making your videos in the future!
@StarlingHKАй бұрын
yeah! i know you need the clout because im definately so much more popular than you XD
@Yourbuddy_HollyАй бұрын
Smaller KZbinr with absolute banger videos that appeal to my tism appearing randomly on my feed????? I’m overjoyed
@StarlingHKАй бұрын
tism pals 😎
@ObsTho-100Ай бұрын
shut up.
@Blobby01101Ай бұрын
Damn first stumblng across messir and now you? thats two amazing flyout creaters in a month. I hope I can learn more about this community because these videos are fascinating.
@desk-kunАй бұрын
Looking forward for future videos!
@GamingGremlin21Ай бұрын
Bro I'm so glad there's more flyout creators
@GamingGremlin21Ай бұрын
Even more unhinged messier it's amazing
@StarlingHKАй бұрын
@@GamingGremlin21 youre the second person whoes said thatr and i love it XD
@thecolonel7524Ай бұрын
This looks amazing, I wish I could build in this game at all since I do not wish to acquire an aerospace degree to play my precious nerdy plane game. All around great video and hope to see more content like this.
@StarlingHKАй бұрын
im a 17 year old highschool dropout, if i can do this trhan you can XD
@thecolonel7524Ай бұрын
@ oh I honestly expected this to be from someone with some sort of background in it from how high fidelity it is. (Also my building may or may not be due to my lack of a think called patience :))
@keks5547Ай бұрын
tbh i didnt actually really care abt the plane, i was just kind of listening to his voice, its so amazingg!!
@StarlingHKАй бұрын
*her
@ickschreiber3493Ай бұрын
this reminds me of the su 34. nice build
@kazakhstanisastate4614Ай бұрын
wobnam that builds planes!!!. subscribed
@StarlingHKАй бұрын
yes, i am wobnam :3
@kiliandrilltzsch8272Ай бұрын
Unironically when you explained the knigge bein system i though "thats briliant why didnt i think of that" for soem reason😂
@StarlingHKАй бұрын
its Knickebein but allso real XD
@Falling_planeАй бұрын
It is, Acceptable. You live to see another day.
@StarlingHKАй бұрын
hoo. thank fuck :3
@Falling_planeАй бұрын
@@StarlingHKI’ve been waiting for another video tick tock
@StarlingHKАй бұрын
@@Falling_plane im having a block rn, idk wtf is up with me XD
@Falling_planeАй бұрын
@@StarlingHK time is ticking, for you
@senioravocado1864Ай бұрын
The sponsor convinced me, so henlo
@StarlingHKАй бұрын
henlo :3
@senioravocado1864Ай бұрын
@@StarlingHK Btw, i love your design, it's unique, I also think this'd be a great fighter bomber like the vietnam era jets
@senioravocado1864Ай бұрын
@@StarlingHK also, OUCH MY EYES, I WAS WATCHING IN PITCH BLACK DARKNESS, AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
@Firew0rkАй бұрын
subscribed!!! 2nd best messier82 hahahaha
@einbaerchen2995Ай бұрын
6:13 did she say "ice cream systems" or am I tripping? 😂
@StarlingHKАй бұрын
*she
@einbaerchen2995Ай бұрын
@StarlingHK woopsi.
@DwoopyNxvaАй бұрын
messier 82 but a bit more unhinged 🤑🤑🤑 (just found your channel and i like what im seeing so far keep it up!!!! :3)
@StarlingHKАй бұрын
a bit more unhinged? your definitrion of "a bit" and my definition of a bit are very different XD
@alanartamonov9236Ай бұрын
damn, realy cool video!😄
@StarlingHKАй бұрын
Let me know how you feel about this different style of video!
@iamarizonaball2642Ай бұрын
odd request, but a supersonic passenger flying boat. i.e the P192 on steroids.
@ObsTho-100Ай бұрын
absolute budcheeks
@soulmangaming6689Ай бұрын
Maybe something like a jet Specifically made to shoot down satellites I know there’s no satellites and fly out but I mean like something that was designed to do it would be sick
@soulmangaming6689Ай бұрын
Subscribe because of this video
@kaisraeАй бұрын
Ooh, on the information part though. I'm no plane goddess, but both MiG-29 and Su-27 lack trust vectoring. The Flanker did get the technology much later on an upgrade, the Su-35, but that is not how they achieve their supermaneuverability - they do so through aerodynamic instability. The blue side of the curtain focused tremendously on BVR, beyond visual range combat. Their aircraft were, save for the F-16, not built with dogfighting at the forefront of their capacities (though it was very much still a requirement; but you will hear most US pilots tell you today that "if you got to the merge, something went wrong".) The MTD Eagle was, I believe, a test bed for the technology we find today on the F-22 Raptor, which does feature thrust vectoring. On the other hand, the red side of the curtain ABSOLUTELY focused on dogfighting and WVR, within visual range combat. Both of their post cold-war workhorses, the Flanker and Fulcrum, as you did mention, are supermaneuverable, but simply by design- They are built like the F-16 was: intentionally aerodynamically unstable, meaning that separation of airflow over the wings is easier (that is how they can achieve angles of attack of 70+ degrees). The doctrine is also observed in their experimental aircraft too, notably the Su-47 Berkut, the forward-swept wing prototype which was another step in favor of supermaneuverability.
@kaisraeАй бұрын
You did mention the difference between aerodynamic maneuverability and supermaneuverability - but the issue is that the later term is pretty muddy. A proper compassion would have been aerodynamic maneuverability and post-stall maneuverability, as the term "supermaneuverability" has been used extensively by aircraft manufacturers yet has no concrete definition. (There is no single statistic you can reach to declare your aircraft "officially" supermaneuverable. Though being able to perform high-aoa maneuvers such as the Kvochur Bell, or it's simpler version, the Cobra, is generally a pretty good starting point - Making the J-35 Draken a supermaneuverable aircraft too, despite very much lacking thrust vectoring.)
@kaisraeАй бұрын
I will however note that fighter aircraft designed today with supermaneuverability in mind absolutely include thrust-vectoring. It is just vastly superior than to simply relying on aerodynamic instability (and I believe both methods are used anyway, as the Raptor, I believe, has low/relaxed stability too.) All in all it's just a small mistake, but I like nerding about things I love 💜
@StarlingHKАй бұрын
wikipedia lied to me than XD
@Fightre_FlighteАй бұрын
@@kaisrae IIRC, the F-22 is also aerodynamically unstable. You didn't ask, but I saw the question.
@kaisraeАй бұрын
@@Fightre_Flighte I researched a bit, and sources kinda contradict. Some say it has low/neutral stability, others mention a very slight unstability. The term "relaxed stability" is thrown around a lot when describing it so it's the one I used
@CutestDeadRatАй бұрын
Are we getting more videos? (This is a threat😳)
@StarlingHKАй бұрын
i- fuck, i guess i have to now
@Apollo___S5Ай бұрын
Here after wanting more M-82.
@crandydandyАй бұрын
"Fuck ass words" Will live rent free in my head until the end of time
@DragonFires-bc2xmАй бұрын
Messiar 82 Ah Ah vibes
@ill3260Ай бұрын
Yup, youre condemned to be a flyout creator now :) I has subscrib The timelapse is neat, though I think you could use more on screen references to the topic you're covering, and make the timelapse a dedicated part of the video, seperate from the narration
@Asimkhan-ei3zbАй бұрын
brother good work brother just upload the vidos faster then messier82 brother by brother
@StarlingHKАй бұрын
i dont know wether to feel flattered or insulted by being called brother XD
@mutingpАй бұрын
Feel like it turned into more of a air superiority plane lol
@MarcePitoАй бұрын
0:36 😂
@factor3290Ай бұрын
101st sub :)
@StarlingHKАй бұрын
WHAT???? IM AT 100 SUBS?????
@kaisraeАй бұрын
N-no way... Another sister??... Into milsims??? 💜💜💜💜💜
@StarlingHKАй бұрын
YES!?!?!?!? HOW YOU KNOW????
@kaisraeАй бұрын
@@StarlingHK I WASN'T SURE SO I CHECKED YOUR TWITCH BIO 💜💜
@devoncampbell3607Ай бұрын
why does your multirole strike aircraft need supermaneuvrability?
@StarlingHKАй бұрын
ill alswer your question with another question. why does it need to be non supermanuverable?