This EPIC Sacrifice Broke Stockfish...

[@sebdoesntreply]

Jokes on you, I constantly play moves that the engine doesn’t see as good

[@thebest-red]

@Jignesh Gupta true engine does not know how to play chess correctly

[@DrinkTeaBro]

@Jignesh Gupta na man you were just brilliant for the queen-pawn trade, engine was right about that

[@potatobake2707]

@@DrinkTeaBro he said the engine called it a blunder

[@greatestclips6428]

@Jignesh Gupta 😂 nice trade!

[@Diamidov11]

Wellll Gotham did say to play moves that the engine doesn’t understand “for better or for worse “ …. ;)

[@bobing1752]

I'm kind of impressed by MVL's defensive skills. After these alien looking sacrifices by Wesley, he played almost perfectly and found every best idea, but it was still not enough.

[@greatmnn3868]

Yes it was double Brilliant Ideas... Commentators were saying he is gonna resign soon... But his Defence was Amazing... And obviously kudus to Weasley.. He attack at first place was Undefendable .

[@stevethetrucker3140]

I agree but I don’t think the attack was that crazy.

[@greatmnn3868]

@@stevethetrucker3140 that attack was not something that was Visible.. It was Silent Suffocating Attacking... That's why It was very beautiful for me

[@philippetarnier9026]

There is very few theory about chess 960 but Nf6 appears very thematic. It put black in such an awful situation....

[@heeronheeron1348]

That goes to show how strong the sac is.

[@notnullnotvoid]

I ran Stockfish 12 for a few hours unattended and it found the move somewhere between depth 41 and depth 52. That's how much it REALLY doesn't want to see this move. Absolutely crazy.

[@0wnpk1]

@MorTobXD On my computer latest Stockfish on 32 threads finds the move in 150-500 million nodes (5 to 15 seconds), lc0 with latest T78 net finds it in 300 nodes (instantly).

[@thanoskyritsis7926]

‘’There is a river nearby, you could jump in’’ *~Eric, Rosen~*

[@chinteshwarbabu9165]

lol

[@franshendrix1404]

Not "oh no, my knight!"?

[@RFxSukhoi]

I love this quote, do you have the larger context to it?

[@GtmNayan]

@@RFxSukhoi He was playing Belankaya in Sochi and they were ”trash talking” each other.

[@RFxSukhoi]

@@GtmNayan Thanks.

[@SomeRandomDevOpsGuy]

Hey man, GREAT showing at the tournament. Being so far rated below the others, competing with 2 IMs who are now GMs, and the grind of being a youtube/twitch entrepreneur... all that and still won 1, lost 2*, and drew the rest. I am as proud of you as a stranger could be. Seriously, those games were so fun to watch just knowing who was making the moves.

[@izakjacob1763]

Couldn't agree more

[@unnamedperson8619]

Not to downplay levy's performance, but didnt he lose 2 games?

[@mihailcirlig8187]

@@unnamedperson8619 yes, against the two GMs I think

[@bsm1114]

@@unnamedperson8619 yeah but he never lost against a super GM (apart from Hikaru XDDDDDDD)

[@kbk239]

@@unnamedperson8619 Yes but the goal of the tournament was not really to perform, it was to learn, improve and then perform and become a GM.

[@secretzzs3630]

"go play some moves the engine doesn't understand" levy hard baiting for guess the elo content

[@jobinsreji9971]

😂😂😂

[@rabailey10]

I liked the subtle strike at Naka “Wesley is No. 2 in America behind Fabiano.” Naka is arguably now at most No. 4 in classical also behind Aronian. Naka can’t stand that lol.

[@osamaounallahkhamis2077]

How is that a strike lol, he just stated something factual

[@whocares2277]

I play so well the engine is always confused and writes "??".

[@narutoshippuden473]

for better or for worse XD

[@lambsaucethejedi1596]

When i play chess, the engine doesnt understand a single move. That bishop "sacrifice" 23 moves ago was crucial to getting a past pawn and sacrificing the past pawn for a queen promotion on the other side, winning my game against my 600 rated opponent

[@chimp9465]

That bishop sacrifice was clearly a brilliant move, perhaps even rivaling bobby fischers legendary queen sacrifice.. also its pass pawn btw cuz it means ur pawn has a free pass to the end and isnt opposed by a pawn on their side

[@exodusdonley77]

@@chimp9465 Actually, it's "past" pawn here because in the present the pawn is now a queen, aren't you paying attention

[@Schaschaki]

@@chimp9465 I'm pretty sure it's passed pawn though? ;)

[@ymirtheymir2403]

Martin Kra its actually pest pawn, bc the pawn is a pest to your opponent

[@chimp9465]

@@ymirtheymir2403 hm thats a fair take on it lol ill give you that, im pretty sure its actually passed pawn tho, which honestly makes thinking it could be past pawn make alot more sense

[@YourPhysicsSimulator]

Wesley wanted to get featured on a Guess the Elo episode so badly that he ended up being featured on an episode where Levy shows a brilliant game. Well played, my friend

[@miguelangelowong6786]

gothamchess is god in flesh form

[@bomboid]

Can't believe I stumbled upon you here! I watch your vids lol

[@YourPhysicsSimulator]

@@bomboid Really?, thank you so much

[@davoodoh3137]

@@miguelangelowong6786 nah

[@ajlassick5982]

Levy: “Wesley plays a move the engine doesn’t see!!!” Me: I do that all the time! *laughs in Botez Gambit*

[@dageneral7708]

I dont get it botez gambit?

[@macmadness5932]

@@dageneral7708 its a queen sacrafice, and i dont feel like explaining the joke

[@lamepotato3407]

@@dageneral7708 blundering a queen

[@Stien58_]

LOL

[@dageneral7708]

@@lamepotato3407 Oh. OOOOOOOOOOOOH

[@dannybeast6660]

Only this man could be putting out so much great content whilst still trying to get the gm title RESPECT

[@LovelyDuck]

Pin of truth when?

[@Aerowind]

On the one hand yeah, on the other hand, him analyzing a bunch of games like this is probably helping him on that road. Not to mention the million man cheer squad.

[@aidenhayes7153]

Stock fish had a stroke

[@sriracha9729]

bruh... he doesn't really care about gm title, it is just another topic for "content".

[@x0cx102]

@@sriracha9729 not necessarily. if he only cared about content and didn't matter the gm title he probably wouldn't have gone back to otb tournaments anyway since it's more stressful for him and he's already got a good gig on youtube and twitch

[@AviansEnthusiast]

One of those rare moments when Stockfish is out of stock.

[@joshuapunzalan8380]

Lmao

[@pontusl1421]

Stock overflow

[@whamer100]

@@pontusl1421 Stock overfish

[@SylarisYT]

@@whamer100 Overfish stock

[@crimsonitacilunarnebula]

non-stock-fish

[@superbrawl8391]

The one time Levy can say ‘computers don’t understand chess’ and the one episode he doesn’t say it

[@itsdifficulttocreateaperfe9850]

But he basically said it

[@johnchessant3012]

My games also confuse Stockfish. It does not understand how anyone could play such dumb moves.

[@infra_Gray]

??

[@shawnakshivakumar]

lmaooo

[@saltypineapples998]

Felt that

[@nicky2coats]

Hahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahah great comment

[@buttonfire6663]

@@infra_Gray ??,?!,?

[@TheBrainiac12]

"You never try to destroy an entire castle with one horse"- Levy Rozman, Guess the Elo 18 9:09

[@sebastianholzl4668]

YO I ran all the moves from the knight sac on to the queen trade through my Stockfish 14 and gave it like 3 minutes in every position. Not only did Wesley attack with only top-engine moves, MVL defended in the most engine-perfect way. Like, even when Levy said that h5 was the most precise defense, Stockfish 14 discards this move after about 30 seconds and suggests bishop takes b5. And MVL found this defense over the board. That is INSANE. And even the continuation, sliding the rook over and trading queens is top engine-level stuff. Unbelievable.

[@SizeableTroutGameing]

I wish we could get an openings video occasionally like the ones he used to do.

[@NotKiramisu]

He could plug his courses after an opening video if he wants to as well. It could hook him some customers who want a more of a deeper dive into some lines rather than just a quick overview.

[@kws7725]

Does a 10 min opening video really accomplish alot though.... theres books with 1500 variations for 1c4. Theres alot of better ways to make educational content. But tbh levy is more for entertainment, his training games have been the most instructive videos he has put out.

[@samhatts5601]

Watch hanging pawns he does great opening videos

[@manawearblack]

@@kws7725 his opening videos are usually 30 minutes or so now, and his Vienna one almost single handedly got me to 1200.

[@kws7725]

@@manawearblack yea i will admit i watched the vienna one a couple time a while back, i guess there good for introducing some possibilities to people then we can go explore them in more detail. But tactics everyday is where we start to farm rating points.

[@matijabanjan3960]

Wesley is such a beast in Fisher random, love it. I honestly would love to see him in the future against Carlsen for the World Chess Championship title, I think that would be amazing match!

[@mariosandiego76]

he could hardly join the candidates.WCC is just too far fetched.

[@matijabanjan3960]

So is world number 6 if I'm not mistaken, if he tries a bit he can reach candidates :)

[@VegetaPixel]

@@matijabanjan3960 He's reached the Candidates before, but he came 7th out of 8. Still, you never know.

[@kaythia-s9h]

I've thought this myself! He beat Magnus 13.5 to 2.5 in the World Fischer Random Championship - I think if he played him in classical it would be a real war. All about if Wesley could complicate the board enough since he tends to win in those positions more often.

[@anteeklund4159]

Nf6+ feels just like the kind of move I would play in a bullet game

[@peep2268]

Let's be honest man we'd probably hang our queen on the long diagonal

[@Asr.-]

@@peep2268 yeah man the long diagonals always screws up my 3 minute blitz games

[@isavenewspapers8890]

@@Asr.- Let me guess, triple digits?

[@Werdna12345]

Wesley: Nf6 Computer: “Man! Humans are nasty! We are so bad at chess!” 😉

[@evavirydova5919]

"Humans are scumbags!"

[@saharshluthra6492]

Computer: "Shut up human, you don't know anything about chess"

[@snappingbear]

Wrong. Stockfish would easily beat anyone including So or Carlson. BTW, Nf6 doesn't provide any advantage over a3 because both result in draws.

[@isavenewspapers8890]

@@snappingbear Yes, engines are stronger than humans. Looks like the joke went over your head. As for the second part... well, I don’t know why you included the second part, because it’s not relevant to anything. Edit: It’s also wrong. Straight-up.

[@snappingbear]

@@isavenewspapers8890 The second part refers to comments made in the video. Looks like that obviously went over your head, but that it did wouldn't surprise anyone.

[@rockyjforay]

I have a hard enough time learning to play with the pieces in their original position

[@suezuccati304]

The point of 960 is that you know less how to play it

[@johnstevenson9956]

@@suezuccati304 I certainly do.

[@dragonbane44]

@@suezuccati304 I certainly know less, you got that part right.

[@granthdhir7491]

@@dragonbane44 my rating is rapid 1700

[@alvarohigino]

It's hard for you and for your oponent, it's more fun, try it.

[@matsr_2279]

Left it on a bit longer, stock 14 finds it after about 30 minutes on my pc at depth 31!!

[@greengoblin9567]

Wesley probably got a bit lucky that the tactics worked. It would be computationally intensive to be confident that the tactics work, so the computer is a pussy and writes the move off

[@bobjoe8182]

i let lichess's stockfish 14 run, left computer, and came back to depth 38 to find that nf6+ was the top engine move, so no, that sacrifice didn't break stockfish, you just had to increase the depth

[@softwarelivre2389]

Infinity depth stockfish never makes a mistake, though. Just like infinite minimax.

[@Isthatthegrimreaper170]

It broke stockfish 13

[@bobjoe8182]

@@loganashby2695 title was not misleading. title was false information, regardless of what he said in the video

[@naymorningstar]

@@bobjoe8182 Not necessarily: 13 can't see it.

[@bobjoe8182]

@@naymorningstar lmfao. so i could play a move that stockfish 1 cant see and say i broke stockfish. ofc latest version is only one worth mentioning

[@Nosikas]

I’m gonna guess this is Wesley So’s Nf6 before the video even loads

[@MikeyFromClashOfClans]

Probably, yeah

[@Auroraisvibing21]

Funny seeing you around here.

[@adibalabharat8247]

prophet

[@speedyx3493]

That's why I like Fisher's chess. You don't have to know lots of theory, the player that played better wins

[@elias-ioanrasca7808]

Wesley So: makes a brilliant move that stockfish did not see Stockfish after the move: of course i saw it, i just didnt like it

[@Maxx61]

Over the years, I've discovered after an opponent's King side castle, getting that middle pawn protecting the big fella away from that second square was worth many a sacrifice. Credit to So for seeing it in a position and time format that doesn't give the players much time for deep levels of thought. That's why I love Bobby's creation. It brings out the visionaries. On a related note, I was watching this live down the cyber hall at "the club" and Maurice nearly coughed up a hairball after seeing it. LOL

[@anamoyeee]

Gotham: rooks dont jump over the pieces welcome to gotham chess recaps Meanwhile: 3:03 (i know castling normally makes rook jump over the kin but this one looks like the castling didn't happen because the king didn't move)

[@chimp9465]

In shogi (japanese chess), the rooks can jump pieces i think, maybe theyre playing that

[@anamoyeee]

@@chimp9465 no that's just a rule in chess960 i think not in japanese variation chess

[@chimp9465]

@@anamoyeee chess960 plays like regular chess, the only rules is that the king must start between your two rooks for castling and your bishops cant be on the same colour, other than this its the same mechanically though

[@anamoyeee]

@@chimp9465 i mean if the rook starts in the corner and the king next to the rook the king doesn't move, the rook just phases through the king 2 squares

[@chimp9465]

@@anamoyeee o i see now lol thats so weird

[@bernardocarneiro4169]

You didn't talk about some engines saying Qh6 was a blunder

[@Johnsli]

When going through analysis in a line after one of my games, one move was shown as giving the best advantage, but having actually played it stockfish concidered it a blunder.

[@Drawfill]

I feel like 960 is breeding grounds for brilliant moves. I wish more people played it.

[@jaredcarter1165]

I feel so proud of myself for actually considering the first two moves of the tactic, i admit I didn't fully theorize but weakening the kingside pawns for a crushing attack is a big point I've taken from many of Levy's videos

[@DjVortex-w]

I let Stockfish 12 to mull on that position for quite a while. After 4.5 billion nodes, depth 46/60, it considers Bc2 the best move, at +2.8. At no point did it suggest Nf6. I then made the Nf6 move and let it analyze that position, and after 1 billion nodes, depth 42/69 , it ended up on +3.8.

[@_APV_]

Thank you for your CPU time sacrifice, lol. I stopped mine at depth 36 with same result.

[@tonywo2735]

The funny thing is that stockfish not only cant see Nf6, it cant see the following Qh6 neither. It gives Bc2 as the best follow up with +2 eval but after it sees Qh6 it says +5 eval.

[@bernardocarneiro4169]

It says Qh6 was a blunder xD

[@ilyasergeev8634]

However, the new Stockfish 15 finds the move almost instantly

[@12magner05]

You should do more videos on chess 960! I like it when high level chess games don’t have any abstract theory to confuse me.

[@user-cv2uf1yy1f]

The KZbin “bell” has changed my life. Much love Levy.

[@windows7821]

lately i always got the notification from his discord, also works.

[@THEpicND]

I watch so much of gotham that youtube shows me every video immediately without the bell

[@teruras]

@@windows7821 Nah sometimes there is much delay. It‘s like Google Chrome vs. Edge

[@hormigatomic1]

@@teruras i dont understand the it’s chrome vs edge part, like are you saying edge it’s slower than chrome? Or what

[@windows7821]

@@hormigatomic1 Isnt that like the typical joke/sterotype?

[@clausable6328]

I tested out the position at 7:10 where the sacrifice was played with a beta version of Stockfish 15. It found Nf6+ in under a second. Just goes to show how much chess engines still need to improve despite being 3600 ELO.

[@khy6330]

Love the reaction of the commentators, shows how true genius leaves mere mortals dumbfounded.

[@scanver1355]

Engines often can’t understand my moves, sometimes I even win after that

[@orbyfied]

stockfish maybe doesnt see it because with optimal play there is no threat?

[@Hanyamanusiabiasa]

Stockfish 15 : Sacrificing queen at the 5th move, and somehow win the game at the 34th move.

[@anthonym1880]

I like that engines still work in 960, because only the setup is different , but all the same rules apply after that

[@deanvanzelst5011]

I actually found knight f6. Exept i didnt know what to do after, i just thought when you said its an insane move that it would be some sort of check sacrifice and the only available piece was the knight. Lol.

[@riluna3695]

I did exactly the same thing. Would never have been able to follow it up, but when given enough hints I can find clever things :D

[@Isthatthegrimreaper170]

The worst part about finding a ridiculous engine move Trying to find the continuation

[@parzingtheasian]

@@riluna3695 even when i get hints i still don't understand anything, sadge

[@hq5485]

When you predict Nf6 when levy asks even though u have no idea why: Maybe I am a grandmaster

[@isasophieful]

Once I saw it, Nf6 actually made sense at first sight, because I was used to giving up pieces to try to exploit dark-square weaknesses with Qh6.

[@viktor5910]

12:02 is typical GM talk, give this man GM already

[@trondeg74]

Fun fact: Wesley So is actually the Fischer Random world champion (also called Chess 960 - or 9LX if you create an unholy union of Roman and Arabic numerals). He beat Magnus Carlsen in the finals in 2019, making it the only championship Magnus doesn't currently hold.

[@ethandarbourne8045]

Massive trade occurs, “so material is completely equal” HOW IS IT ALWAYS COMPLETELY EQUAL IT PISSES ME OFF

[@Someone25948]

Because they wouldn't trade if it wasn't equal

[@greengoblin9567]

Otherwise it would be a serious blunder and one player would lose the game.

[@Isthatthegrimreaper170]

They're super gms for a reason

[@parasyadav6849]

I do a massive trade and suddenly I am down a rook , 😂😂

[@stoutlager6325]

You don't enter the trade if it's losing. That's why.

[@mkwilson1394]

That Nf6 reminds me of Byrne - Fischer 1963. You expect the knight to go after material in the form of a rook, but instead it collapses the enemy position. Really beautiful.

[@artsenor254]

I know of another great example of a sacrifice that Stockfish has a lot of trouble seeing or even understanding, but I can't seem to find the game in which it was played (I know it was Leela as white and she won, but I couldn't find it). It goes as a bishop sacrifice in the Ruy Lopez opening ; the game went 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Bc5 (i believe this was the pre-arranged position) 4. c3 Bb6 5. d4 exd4 6. cxd4 Nce7 7. O-O c6 (maybe the move order isn't perfectly right, but you get to that position), in which Leela played 8. d5 with the idea to follow 8... cxb5 with 9. d6 and completely paralyze black's position. If anyone remembers that game, I'd be glad if you could share the reference.

[@BigBigFlo]

I was gonna comment on your Rorschach impression in your previous video (because it was so on point) but boy do I like you Stockfish impressions in that one!! Great energy and vibe in that video!

[@omegadeadpool2947]

I break the Engine on the regular, half the time the Engine is probably having an Aneurysm attack when I play

[@nahimislam749]

Can't wait till Levy becomes a grandmaster

[@RockClimberAlex]

7:48 5th of January 2022 here. If you put the position in lichess today it immediately gives Nf6, it shows "cloud depth 36". Some positions are in a database, I suspect, looks like this one made it in.

[@clausable6328]

What is so crazy is that I tested out a beta version of the upcoming Stockfish 15. I ran it locally on my machine, and it found the move legit under a second, with no cloud help!

[@FunnyMemes-dr3se]

Wesley So be making stockfish rethink. I wonder if the engine can even spot it as brilliant.

[@c1ph9r]

Wesley: * *made A MOVE that engines doesn't understand* * Levy: "What a brilliant move!!!n :POGFACE* Guess the Elo submitters: * *Plays MOVES that engines doesn't not understand* * Levy: "What the hell was that, you 600, Bozo???"

[@itscominghome1209]

“so, wesley begins with the move b4” unintentional but brilliant

[@DrZaius3141]

I am already disappointed this game didn't begin with: 1. O-O

[@noahtetreault3859]

The engine saw Nf6, he just didn’t like it

[@musicforsoul9922]

I played a move that engine tells is a blunder, but on the very next move I checkmated the opponent, and that “blunder” move was necessary.

[@lookdiogenes]

I would love to see showcase spotlights of the top 50 active players to get a better sense of the stakes and better engage with the sport.

[@AndrewBeveridge461]

Levy a few days ago when a position never seen arose: "Chess is hard." Levy today: "Here's some stuff where the rules were put in a blender."

[@tentop1234]

I make moves that engines don’t understand everyday. I think the technical term for them is “blunders”

[@erenjaeger3598]

GMs * plays the moves that engines could not understand me, 400Elo * plays one move threat that actually hung a piece.

[@prayagchawla1603]

grt job levy, pls post recaps of the fide chess olympiad since the format is very confusing and no one does it better than you!! Keep up the gud work, luv your videos

[@AntiTheory]

I actually saw the move in question, figuring that opening up the space after the pawn takes the knight would allow for some kind of tricky mating trap, which is funny because I don't usually see those sorts of plays.

[@alinerizo.]

Never clicked this fast in my life... actually, I have, that was Levy's win in the Round Robin event

[@DrinkTeaBro]

trueeee

[@potatobake2707]

love how the commentators are that much worse than these guys, that if the engine doesnt agree, they assume the player is wrong

[@carlhedgins]

The commentators are gms btw

[@potatobake2707]

@@carlhedgins thanks will edit comment

[@haleysettembre]

7th day of translating Levy's titles into Neapolitan: "Stu sacrific epic ha rutt Stockfish"

[@Vlad_the_Implier]

*ruba la corona al re prima di andarsene*

[@vignusky]

lu cavall ha scassat ù stocco, uagliù!

[@Darkness3827]

I wonder if there's ever been a case of the reverse where Stockfish thought a move was super winning but didn't see a counter to it.

[@emmettdja]

OMG I GOT IT! KNIGHT F6 CHECK! I knew it! Big brain. 7:48

[@NightmareToast9]

holy moly, i actually guessed it right, the knight sacrifice move lol, i didnt know this game or anything, but tbh i just see it as ooo, lets ruin the structure then i have no idea what to mvoe next kek

[@detectivemarkseven]

8:30 "dont copy strike me" then nervous laughter 😅 lol

[@steelistheunworthy6534]

chess 960? didnt know they made tournaments at my elo lvl

[@MohammedKHan-eu6hz]

What about 690 should be close to my level

[@byzantines2000]

The engine never understands my moves, always for worse.

[@dysonsphere2394]

Tal is smiling from heaven

[@Seanderson3]

"I like the preposterous like pan to the camera and there's just a knight on f6" *_this description paired with the camera footage made me laugh_*

[@innesm5963]

*New video idea for Levy:* Create three or five games (with players of increasing ranks i.e. 700s, 900s, 1200, 1800s etc...) and put them all in move 20 (or any particular move) of a very famous chess game and see how the players play the position! I think it would be really interesting to see the comparisons between playstlyes and the development and implementation of certain tactics and ideas of specific ranks. Then when you've recapped the new games, explain how the original game was played and why it was so famous! I love your content Levy, really enjoying recent videos and going back and watching the old ones (your energy has been off the charts lately). Appreciation and support from the UK 🇬🇧 !

[@wardsmith2542]

Fun fact, Bobby Fisher was pushing for the back row change 60 years ago. He said chess had become too "predictable"

[@schizoframia4874]

This should be a youtube series

[@sonicast5631]

I tested the position on my computer and Stockfish 14 finds Nf6+ at depth 34, however the reply after gxf6 is Nc3 in the PV until depth 41, and when playing Nf6+ gxf6 it finds very quickly Qh6. So technically Stockfish can find the sacrify, it just takes time

[@fogtim]

MVL busted like 10 minutes off his clock in a 15 minute game or something trying to play f5. I remember watching live how shocked the commentators slowly became from the knight sac

[@bims4575]

Wow. Gothamchess is so close to overtaking agadmator

[@1.4142]

they are tied right now, but soon he will be the biggest chess youtuber

[@DekritGampamole]

Legend says that Stockfish was hospitalized after this game.

[@nothingspecial8968]

To be honest, I saw that because that is the only move that opens the king too much with the bishop pair and forces to take

[@salient9935]

Props to MVL for holding that position for a while.

[@The22Century]

This game is incredible. I love chess.

[@duartista]

I play quite a lot of moves that engines don't understand, that's how how I roll baby

[@TheChameleon64]

Fascinating to see how levy's analysis is on the spot even in another chess variant

[@santinomozzarella4270]

1:00 i see what you did there rozman levy

[@loganpaulwastakenwastaken]

I'm constantly playing moves that the engine doesn't understand

[@lyssalud6781]

my wife in the background: "shut up chessguy, chess is not gangster." 🥲

[@lyssalud6781]

@Eric Lee i guess the way i wrote it you can interpret it toxic or jokingly either way. Not every corner of life is toxic and looking for it seems like a terrible life choice. I have the best wife. _Sie passt wie die Faust aufs Auge_ (btw a specific phrase that can only be determined whether it fits perfectly or not at all when you hear *how* I say it.)

[@OutstandinglySteve]

Lmao Levy trying not to get copyright striked was quite entertaining

[@JuanPablodelaTorre]

When So plays it is a masterful move, but when I play it is a rookie blunder... not fair

[@Eggemeyers]

11:55 actually what MVL played with Bxb5 is by far better than h5. At depth 38, h5 is +10.49, while Bxb5 is +5.64.

[@kellynolen498]

I want a engine that plays for an en passent checkmate or draw with as much depth as needed

[@Doupis]

Saw it live the commentators said it was not a good move at first. They were like “what?” 😂

[@therightway15]

I can't believe it but I actually found it. The dark square weakness in the position gave it away for me.

[@Karn0010]

I always play moves the engine doesn't see. That is how I blunder all my pieces in 2 moves.

[@violetsapphire952]

Holy shit. Wesley's really out here living in 3020 while I'm still just looking at the board like Confused Unga Bunga