Рет қаралды 1,062
The final of four behind the scenes videos I released to Patreon in 2016. Never did end up making that Q&A. Maybe I'll do one after the rewrite is out.
Anyway... I think a lot can be said about the approach I had to literary analysis at the time. Probably most obviously that I was wrong at the very least about the motivations of the writers in this show. And perhaps that I was turning analysis into something way too personal.
I think I've relaxed quite a bit on this in the years since (in no small part to this approach going so badly for me here). I do still enjoy analysis as a way to try to figure out the author, but almost all of the time I approach it with the assumption that I'm probably wrong.
I don't know, I guess this shows that if the approach I had to TJLC Explained was a mistake, it was an earnest one. I still do think it would have been very cool if the writers HAD intended M Theory as a commentary on the history of Holmes adaptations and Sherlockians. And hey, some people still think that's what they're doing, But More.
But in general I wish I had framed things more as "hey here's an interesting way to view these parts of the text which I think are intentional" and less as "this is what is DEFINITELY happening."
Social Media:
Twitter: / victorianpining
Tumblr: / victorianpining
AO3: archiveofourow...
Main Twitter: / legendofrebekah