Marco!! You’re spot on man with everything you said! I own aquanaut 5167A and paid over double retail for it as well as a few modern Cartiers. The Aquanaut is not worth the money although I love it. It’s just that I wanted a sports watch from Patek to add to the complication and grand complications that I have as well as a Calatrava and an Ellipse and couldn’t justify the price of a Nautilus. I love rubber straps and use after market ones for all my Rolex watches cuz it makes the wearing experience much nicer, therefore I bought that Aquanaut. I never got into the rabbit hole of vintage Cartier for the exact reason you mentioned, which is the quality of their movements and water resistance that makes the watch unwearable. I got into ordering those pieces from the new catalog that is not available for most people. I find the crash a hype watch and probably one of the least appealing designs from Cartier. RM prices are not justifiable and I don’t think it’s just the RM11, it’s just all not justifiable and I’m mind boggled about why these watches cost so much regardless of the innovation and material. Growing up in the Middle East and living for over a decade in Dubai, I still never understood why these Omani Khanjar stamped on a dial or engraved on the case back should make any difference at all in the price. Well I think the same concept applies to Tiffany or Gueblin stamps too. It’s just an excuse and a hype created by grey market dealers to maximise their profit. Roger Smith is overpriced and is not worth the money. I appreciate his art but I believe he is charging too much for it. Great content! I’m a big fan. Good luck.
@richardmorris63652 ай бұрын
Aquanaut is gorgeous, & agree a good rubber strap is a game changer.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you for the support brother I'm glad you enjoyed this. Agree and good to hear a lot of your points, thank you for sharing 🙏
@Nordic_Sky2 ай бұрын
An articulate and intelligent video. A pleasure to watch.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you! 🙏
@waynemoore99512 ай бұрын
The aquanot. 30m water resistance for a water themed watch.
@Sumerdini2 ай бұрын
👎
@davecorry77232 ай бұрын
But didn't Patek come out recently declaring their water-resistance to be *actual* water resistance, and not the pressurized equivalent? Meaning that their 30m means you can actually dive to 30m with it ...
@choyayahyah2 ай бұрын
No, it's 120m. 30m became the default standard for Patek but it's 120m
@LIONTAMER3D2 ай бұрын
@davecorry7723 who's diving with a bezel-less watch?
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Hard to disagree.. hope you enjoyed this 🙏
@decundiwatkins4395Ай бұрын
How does RM get a pass for using non in-house movements from renaud & papi and parmigani
@Iuckylukey2 ай бұрын
Your videos are full of wisdom, thanks!
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for the support and kind words! 🙏
@HilightedАй бұрын
Thank you very much! Liked, subscribed and shared. My absolute favorite KZbin channel by far.
@ListenToPowerViolence2 ай бұрын
I see a Marco video I upvote and comment. It's really a simple process.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for the continued support brother! 🙏
@theodorillerАй бұрын
I was at Leonard before and I am so glad that I found this.
@kaunas8882 ай бұрын
I agree completely. These are the absurd of the absurd in terms of pricing.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you! 🙏
@AJHall-y4z2 ай бұрын
Thank you for sharing your bold, honest and courageous opinion. I am so glad to hear that there is at least one more person who has similar opinion as mine:)
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you! Glad you enjoyed this video 🙏
@SallaLaurilaАй бұрын
I love watching your videos and MAMACOO to keep myself updated on the world of watches
@mhardy5448Ай бұрын
Rogers Smith made 18 watches last year (not 80-100)- up from around 12 a few years ago - he has a team and premises to pay for and my god the quality is terrific ! A watch takes utpo a year to make and the guy that makes it does everything
@Uriel7672 ай бұрын
goodjob son... totaly agree on the hyped watches, beter a nice complication, some extra difficulties ,thats nice 👍👍
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you! 🙏
@jemwatch1Ай бұрын
Couldn’t agree with you more Marco! Good luck at Burdeens !
@Crackers25492 ай бұрын
I couldn't agree more Marc ...! I never liked the look of a RM to begin with... AND yep that Patek way over priced... Spot on Marco and your presentation here is flawless, excellent video...! You're in my neck of the woods now LOL ... I need to drop in on you sometime... Greg
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Sure thing Greg! Feel free to stop in anytime I'm at the 120 E Oak St location. Glad you enjoyed this 🙏
@ok_littleharry88462 ай бұрын
Thanks Marco. Wishing you well.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you! 🙏
@Illinination532 ай бұрын
Agree here , 5167 worth retail value or a bit over all day . Nice video Marco !
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you brother 🙏
@josephwolf2256Ай бұрын
Dude, you have to stop apologizing. You undermine your own credibility when you keep saying "just my opinion," "for me personally," "you may see it differently," etc etc etc. We get it: it's YOUR opinion. Give it a rest...
@MrClaudeCrookАй бұрын
Canadians tend to do this lol
@blakeachesonАй бұрын
weird to be triggered by this
@josephwolf2256Ай бұрын
@@blakeacheson"triggered???" Is that really what you want to call it? Gee, tell me more about me. You seem to have keen insights into my psyche...
@choyayahyah2 ай бұрын
Marco, I couldn't agree more as a watch collector. Regarding the 5167A I never owned one but i have a 5168G in blue and i almost never wear it because it just doesn't do anything for me. Thankfully, i got it retail from my AD though.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Obviously you are very safe having bought it from your AD. 5168 is a great watch but I just don't see it being worth $70k+ on the secondary market. Just not my thing personally. Glad you enjoyed this 🙏
@choyayahyah2 ай бұрын
@MarcoFerranteWatches I agree 100%
@choyayahyah2 ай бұрын
@MarcoFerranteWatches fyi, I had purchased a few nice VCs from Burdeens including an overseas perpetual skeleton in rose with blue dial (or whatever dial is left)
@davecorry77232 ай бұрын
Wow, Marco, what a great, refreshing video! Full respect to Burdeens to allow you to speak your mind and treat your audience like thinking adults.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you! Burdeen's is amazing and gives me full autonomy (within reason of course) regarding my content. Glad you enjoyed this 🙏
@FJMBZ2 ай бұрын
Great video Marco, agree on Patek aquanaut and nautilus 100%
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you! 🙏
@leonardoluc6362Ай бұрын
Thanks for the review, appreciated and agree.
@NerlyBellasАй бұрын
Love your channel with so many stellar watches! For me the MAMACOO’ watch is my favorite. Keep the videos coming. Thanks.
@Brainiacmind2023Ай бұрын
Good work Marco !!!
@akcoop2 ай бұрын
Great vid. I totally agree with you. These watches are really all hype. Nice, but hyped
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you! 🙏
@Nobiggiesal2 ай бұрын
Completely agree with the 5167, coming from someone that owned it. A 3rd generation Overseas or an AP15300 is much more watch for the money. One in particular to me that I can't comprehend the secondary value is the Daytona LeMans. I've never handled one, but this piece goes for about triple retail. Great vid Marco.
@lv2932 ай бұрын
What made you sell it? Did you not like it overtime?
@troisk2 ай бұрын
The regular Daytona has the lowest supply out of the Rolex pro range, so the LM which is the rarest of Daytonas with a very limited production (the white gold 126529 was discontinued after less than a year, and the current yellow gold 126528 has only been around for less than 6 months and appears to be even more scarce), it's no surprise. And the celebration story, open caseback and revised 4132 movement all add to the hype. Completely agree with the 5167. I've tried one on and although it wears well and has amazing finishing on the movement and case as you'd expect from Patek, it still feels very underwhelming. I find it expensive for MSRP (basically the price of a pre-owned 126500...), let alone for twice MSRP. But with that said I don't think "value" is ever a valid point when it comes to luxury goods. They aren't necessities, you buy what you love at the price you can stomach. You will always find a watch with a better value proposition, all the way down to a Casio F91W.
@Iuckylukey2 ай бұрын
Apparently Genta hated the Aquanaut. That should tell you something.
@richardmorris63652 ай бұрын
Daytona is so well designed & feels & looks so iconic. It needs to be in the 18k range for steel.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you for the continued support brother! The Lemans is nice but definitely don't understand triple retail lol. But I guess it doesn't matter as I will never be able to afford one lol. Appreciate you 🙏
@John-yr8ep2 ай бұрын
Keep it up Marco! Loved the vid
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you! 🙏
@miabeatz802 ай бұрын
Another way of looking at the aquanaut and the Nautilus is comparing it to the sub vs gmt. The gmt is pretty much the same watch as the sub just different bezel and gmt hand yet sells almost double retail grey market with the Pepsi and batman. I look at the aquanaut like an alternative to the nautilus for folks who don't want an integrated bracelet but still want Patek prominence that's wearable everyday. That clearly comes with a cost. It's a great addition and alternative to all the dress watch only ethos that Patek have.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
I do feel this comparison is apt although I'd say the Sub is more iconic than the GMT while the Aquanaut is not more iconic than the Nautilus. But your point is not lost on me and I don't disagree. Hope you enjoyed this 🙏
@martinbishop2966Ай бұрын
Couldn't agree more, I do have a Studio Underdog Watermelon gen 3 on order for delivery in March 2025. Cost £550.00p, good value! 😁
@michaelchiu73172 ай бұрын
Totally agreed! Thanks.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you for the support 🙏
@inxs777Ай бұрын
I have a huge watch collection with very rare and expensive pieces BUT the Aquanaut 5167a is my absolute favorite watch BECAUSE it is so simple and easy to wear
@samplechannel2fiyd5idjfufjfud2 ай бұрын
Daytona is overrated as hell; an unusable chronograph with screw-down button, obnoxious look, overall 2 out 10 from me.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Totally fair, I personally would disagree but I respect your opinion. Hope you enjoyed this 🙏
@bertholdbach4959Ай бұрын
@@MarcoFerranteWatchesWhy do you disagree with him?
@emphasis20Ай бұрын
IMO, I don't like the over-polishing either.
@Tuneitupful2 ай бұрын
Great video Marco👍🏽
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you! 🙏
@musiclover431114 күн бұрын
Aquanaut 5670 IS my absolute favorite. I have many other high end pieces but I prefer it over 5712. Your taste and mine are diametrically opposite.
@billchan61802 ай бұрын
Thanks for being so brave to say what you feel. Khanjars are special but i agree without been stamped on the dial it looks just like any other rolex
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you for the support on the video 🙏
@billchan61802 ай бұрын
@ you are doing great, more believable than even your old company, who kinda do a know it all attitude.
Interesting choices. Totally agree on the Aquanaut. Valuations getting a free ride off of the Nautilus unavailability. It is a nicely molded rubber strap though 🤣
@richardmorris63652 ай бұрын
I like complications but on the Aquanaut it looks good as is on brown rubber but not for over 30k.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Lol yes comfortable watch no doubt. Hope you enjoyed this 🙏
@briannguyen6509Ай бұрын
Spot on video! I don’t understand the whole Cartier vintage Mike Nouveau scene. He’s a great salesman though. Free merch and business class flights to Swiss compliments of Cartier and Hermes. I’m sure these watches he pushes suffer in value post sale from the new owner.
@creditguy4922Ай бұрын
Where is burdeens located.
@Ben-yw8beАй бұрын
This is why I only shop underrated watches. I own a 37mm Yachtmaster and a two toned Rolex Explorer.
@Yellowtang12 ай бұрын
Great video.I couldn’t disagree with any of your comments and observations.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you! 🙏
@ThomEmDee2 ай бұрын
Cool to see you running your own page now
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you for the continued support 🙏
@gregsaga6822 ай бұрын
Hey Marco, Great video. Tiffany stamped watches, especially Patek? Future secondary prices on the Cubitus? Not the same hype as Nautilus secondary prices in a year or so? Keep up the good work.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Tiffany Stamp, Gubelin stamp and others are objectively rare and not done often so I understand the premium even if I wouldn't pay it. Hard to know future of Cubitus. Thank you for the continued support 🙏
@NoDrivingNoLifeАй бұрын
Great video, but are you not working with Roman anymore?
@katcrescent98562 ай бұрын
Another great video!
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you brother! 🙏
@grant_a_parker2 ай бұрын
Have to agree re: Cartier. Like there’s nothing wrong with them, but they’re so trendy it would hard for them not to be overrated. And, yeah, I don’t understand the Aquanaut secondary market prices. But I also don’t understand why grey market Daytona’s trade at roughly the same prices as VC Overseas Chronographs.
@keltecdan2 ай бұрын
I think the key takeaway would be to stick with the icons and classics within the brand. Cartier would be the Tank and Santos. Patek would be the Nautilus in a complication and any perpetual calendar chronograph or minute repeater. Rolex has quite a few icons but the best would be Daytona and Submariner. I could go on and on.
@michaelnissen43222 ай бұрын
@@grant_a_parker VC overseas Chronograph over Daytona always
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Totally agree with you. I'd take an Overseas over an aquanaut any day of the week and it comes with a bracelet, rubber and leather strap lol. Hope you enjoyed this 🙏
@goldcds2 ай бұрын
Another great video. I wholeheartedly agree with your analysis. The time only nautilus is insanely overpriced even at it's retail price. I basically dislike all Richard Mille watches, I think they are ugly as can be but do have some interesting technology but the 11 is really bad when a basic movement is used. I was a little shocked to hear that Roger Smith watches had reached that level of price. I am a huge fan of Roger Smith watches, the quality is as good as it gets but the last time I looked at prices, which was a couple years ago, the 3 hand watch with a date was in they $175k range. Now they are $400k+, that seems a little outrageous and also the last time I heard, they were making 12 watches a year, is it really 12 a month now? Anyway, another spot on video.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
I think my numbers were inaccurate in terms of production of Roger Smith. I know he expanded his workforce and is able to make more than 1 watch per month but supposedly it is no more than 3 watches per month. I think that solidifies my point even further despite me getting the figures incorrect in the video. And totally agree the price is simply outrageous now. Thank you for the support on the video 🙏
@marcosdoyter7460Ай бұрын
I thought you worked for Roman Sharf. What happened? Did he fire you?
@realdata862425 күн бұрын
You don’t work for the ruskis anymore?
@Tomb38612 ай бұрын
RW Smith makes 10-12 watches per year - and his order book is full for the remainder of his life. The prices kind of make sense when demand is that high...
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
That simply isn't the case. He produces multiple watches per month as he's expanded his atelier and his order book is open again as many customers have cancelled their order due to the price increases.
@Tomb38612 ай бұрын
@ fair points! I didn't realise this. I stand corrected!
@alberto556792 ай бұрын
That aquanaut is the best😊
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
It is a great watch, just overpriced for what it is. Hope you enjoyed this 🙏
@alberto556792 ай бұрын
@@MarcoFerranteWatchesif you buy on secondary market maybe yes. RM are all overrated
@laszlos48922 ай бұрын
The only think I can add regarding RM, when you are wearing other beautiful watches, people look at the watch, when you wear an RM, people look at the man. That’s the value. Personally I prefer my watches underrated and would rather that no one knows what I’m wearing, except for Cartier. Can’t help but love their designs. The Santos and the Tank are perfection.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Hard to disagree with what you have laid out. Love Cartier also! Hope you enjoyed this 🙏
@jameswestconsultantАй бұрын
Under rated and value priced pieces would include: 36mm Rolex Day-Date double quickset ref. 18238, 36mm DateJust pieces from mid-eighties to late nineties in steel or 18k/steel, 90’s-early 2000’s Omega Speedmasters and those years in Patek annual calendars ☝🏻😉
@shaifulothman74422 ай бұрын
Totally agree with you Marco. You can get a 5131/5231 for the price of 5711...my choice is obvious
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Could not agree more! 5170P I believe is now around the same price as a 5711 blue dial and that should flat out be a crime against humanity as I think the 5170P is one of the most beautiful Pateks ever made. Hope you enjoyed this 🙏
@petenrita2 ай бұрын
excellent presentation. will subscribe.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you! 🙏
@Nofold3Ай бұрын
Why don’t you work for LB anymore?
@EulahFellezsАй бұрын
I've recently began my obsession as a watch collector. And i must say- out of all the luxury brands I've been researching, for me the MAMACOO's watches are the most intriguing.
@RobertTaylor-ub6hv2 ай бұрын
I sure hope this drives the price of the 5968A down. I’d love to have one for my every day
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
It is an amazing watch no doubt! My point was specifically in reference to the 5167A. Regardless, hope you enjoyed this 🙏
@The_real_Mr_Ghost2 ай бұрын
Damn Marco…you will devalue my 5167a now 😂…..great video brother 💪
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Haha I doubt I have the ability to move the market like that. Thank you for the support brother I truly appreciate it! 🙏
@blh9402 ай бұрын
Excerpt from a watch magazine- a bit of a pushback on the anti outsourced movement view: “the aesthetics and materials of the RMCA4 are vastly different from its base - with largely skeletonised components, the usage of titanium for the bridges, and a plethora of custom components such as its variable geometry winding rotor. Nonetheless, the VMF 6710 is its foundation. So both the base and how Richard Mille ran with it, deserve huge props and offer a perfect example of how purely in-house can be overrated and how a manufacture can make a sourced design very much their own.”
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Regardless, the base movement - no matter how modified - is still a Parmigiani movement. I have no trouble using an off the shelf movement. I do have a problem paying $150k for such a watch. Just my opinion. Personally I do not care for the "In-House" movement craze. I think it is ridiculous. Hope my point is not lost on you and hope you enjoyed this video 🙏
@blh9402 ай бұрын
@@MarcoFerranteWatches I gotcha but isn’t a heavily reworked version of a high quality movement a high quality product? Just bought a current release of the RM 010 with the Vaucher movement. Feel like you do that the in house thing is overrated which I why I’m ok with this type of collaboration.
@blh9402 ай бұрын
I wonder if anyone here has ever seen an RM in person/ tried one on etc. Marco is astute enough to recognize the innovation they’ve brought to the industry. Only commenting on a small segment of their offerings negatively.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you! No doubt A LOT of their watches are seriously impressive and overlooked for the crazy innovation they showcase. Glad you enjoyed this 🙏
@JamalCarolina2 ай бұрын
What do u think about the Phillip plain?
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Not familiar with this brand
@WatchesCanBeFun2 ай бұрын
Great video, especially calling out Cartier on making a bunch of junk (and good stuff too)
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you! Tried to be fair and balanced, glad I was able to come across that way 🙏
@litan1142 ай бұрын
THIS IS A VIDEO WHICH HAS GOOD INFO SURE - WILL AVOID THESE WATCHES KEEP UP THESE GOOD VIDS
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you! 🙏
@MichaelMitchell-vk9lkАй бұрын
I love vintage watches and have a great watchmaker restore them for me. They’re so different from the hot new watches and are great values
@rxurph2 ай бұрын
Hey Marco, what do you think of the Odysseus?
@BobbyDazzler8882 ай бұрын
Lange after sales service and service quality is terrible. Look it up. So many people complaining
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Absolutely love the Odysseus! This may be surprising but my favorite is actually the white gold version on rubber. Cheaper and better than an Aquanaut!! Hope you enjoyed this 🙏
@rxurph2 ай бұрын
@ isn’t it still 50+?
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
@@rxurph I sold one recently for $48,000
@masterwatch2 ай бұрын
some good points.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you! 🙏
@javieralborna9511Ай бұрын
that patek philippe with rubber straps is just horrendous! looks like a watch you get as a gift for changing your car tires to Michelin tires!
@416jr2 ай бұрын
What happend to LB ? You don’t work there anymore ?
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
I joined the Burdeen's team in July and it has truly been a blessing 🙏
@Hartwell102 ай бұрын
some controversial choices. But this was a good video. You have good reasoning behind all your opinions. Even if a lot of these models collectors are very fond of.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you! 🙏
@Ferrucci_1666Ай бұрын
Great video
@jamesenglish102Ай бұрын
R M looks like a piece of lego on a strap,but love an aquanaut
@j.m.4444Ай бұрын
Totally agree!
@kaunas8882 ай бұрын
RM's claim to fame seems to be that they are really really expensive.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
It has definitely become an F U money watch for sure. Hope you enjoyed this 🙏
@remus20012 ай бұрын
I don’t understand why you think that the rarity of Roger W. Smith watches is somehow in tension with their prices climbing into the stratosphere. I would think those two facts are directly correlated.
@Greysprunkiyay2 ай бұрын
He talking about retail price, not market value. There’s no way you can justify $400,000 selling a Roger Smith considering the lackluster finishing.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
@@Greysprunkiyay You are correct, not talking market but rather current retail which is frankly absurd for a time only watch in my opinion
@reconteam912 ай бұрын
Great video, way to take a stand on these overrated pieces. I can add 5 more. Keep it up!
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you for the support! 🙏
@joannedrake601918 күн бұрын
I purchase an Stainless Steel Patek Philippe Aquanaut in 1997 for £5750.00 and I've worn it twice as the watch dial looks odds to the rubber strap, and the rubber strap dries out and shrinks. Also you cannot dive in it or go swimming as its only 30 metres and its no way worth more than a 18Kt gold Calatrava. The 1976 Submariner 1680 is a far superior watch in every form and has been a daily wearer and handles everything you can throw at it. Another watch company who makes nice watches is Cartier but their after sales service is absolutely rubbish. I have over the years sent my watches to Cartier service via the AD and they have come back with more scratches on the case than it was sent. The last one was a solid silver Tank which looks like they've given it to a blind apprentice who badly scratched the case and the screws are protruding. It has been sent back to Cartier with a complaint letter as they argued that its not solid silver and plated when its quite clear that it's Sterling silver.
@hatchegg80Ай бұрын
exactly right, no reason why aquanaut should trade over the complications
@gavinwhite97432 ай бұрын
Richard Mille look like watches off Temu, with thousands of Chinese me too examples. It does not ooze class. It’s intersting, I’m not as convinced by secondary prices. A friend of mine struggled to find a shop that was willing to buy his.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Haha fair enough. I totally disagree but respect your opinion. Richard Mille is still quite liquid on the secondary market, it just depends on pricepoints. There is a big range in terms of what most dealers feel comfortable stocking these watches at. Hope you enjoyed this video 🙏
@tictocbang74432 ай бұрын
Love Roger Smith watches, but at over $400K now is just insane.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
I could not agree more! 🙏
@watchGWW2 ай бұрын
Vintage Cartier is crazy over hyped, agreed.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Still love the content around that market though. Hope you enjoyed this 🙏
@watchGWW2 ай бұрын
@MarcoFerranteWatches Absolutely! I think it's great you tackle all sides of the trade
@keeno572 ай бұрын
My list of watches I would like to buy, is long, but it's not one Patek on it, they are simply NOT good looking.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Totally fair, I think they make some beautiful timepieces that are definitely worth your attention. Hope you enjoyed this 🙏
@rapsodicreaperАй бұрын
*do an underrated watches one*
@WorldsOkayestGuitarPlayerKinda2 ай бұрын
I own a 5167A and although I love it, I dont disagree with you. Its alot of money for a stainless watch with a rubber strap.
@o0MadHouse0o2 ай бұрын
The best value for money watch you can buy is the standard Rolex Sub Date. Hands down the greatest do it all watch ever made.
@Steve-cw1zo2 ай бұрын
Couldn’t have said it any better.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
It is hard for me to disagree although I would personally choose the GMT. I am just very biased towards it. Regardless I hope you enjoyed this video 🙏
@o0MadHouse0o2 ай бұрын
@@MarcoFerranteWatchesdon’t get me wrong, the GMT function definitely has a one up on the sub, but the monochrome look of the sub allows it to be worn with anything. The colourful bezel of the GMT does restrict it just a little.
@bertholdbach4959Ай бұрын
One of the most boring watches Rolex has to offer? So much money for an unelegant divewatch. Datejust beats the Sub in all aspects.
@o0MadHouse0oАй бұрын
@@bertholdbach4959You have no idea what you’re talking about. Sit back down and let the adults talk.
@Madeinlondon672 ай бұрын
I’ve owned a Cartier Tank Chronograph and Rolex Daytona for over 15 years and had never owned or tried on any other higher end brands until about 6 months ago. I was in a high end grey market dealer KK in Mayfair and I got to try on a Patek Philippe Aquanaut Chronograph in Rose gold with the brown dial and strap and was extremely impressed. I then went into AP in Harrods a couple of months ago and got to try on 2 Different Royal Oaks and got to register my interest in them (they may never arrive 😂) I have to say that the service that I received in the AP boutique there was 2nd to none.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
That's surprising regarding AP and I'm glad to hear it! The Aquanaut chronos are really nice. I've handled all of them except for the rose gold model and was always impressed. Hope you enjoyed this 🙏
@weezkidtube2 ай бұрын
Keep up the great work, Marco. Agree with your thoughts on the Patek pieces. I'd go with proper complications when getting this brand but not time only pieces.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Definitely agree regarding Patek complications. Thank you for the continued support! 🙏
@richardmorris63652 ай бұрын
Dont care for skeleton watches at all,exposed back case fine it is not even a watch at this pt. The hands are almost invisible. The Aquanaut is simple & gorgeous but not above 30k. My opinion
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Very fair assessment. Hope you enjoyed this 🙏
@tonys9923Ай бұрын
Aquanaut and Nautilus are both 1970’s designs that look almost like digital watches of the era. Not a pleasant shape, not elegant, don’t look sporty and if they didn’t have Patek Phillipe written on them, most people would think they looked very dated (in a bad way). Their only attractive watches are the calatrava range. All the rest look like a homage to the seventies!
@kevorknourian54422 ай бұрын
Agreed 100% finally someone speaks logically
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Thank you! 🙏
@Junaid_PatelАй бұрын
That Aquanaut doesnt even changes date instantaneous which is not acceptable by the brand which has a history of nearly 200 years and been the most prestigious watch brand
@DiegooJohnsenАй бұрын
I absolutely love watches, the high end watch brands are out of my budget but the MAMACOO has literally an almost duplicate of every single watch on the market . Always a great but no matter your budget.
@josh.4722 ай бұрын
I see a better case for RM011 than 11-03. Classic ti RM011 is such a cleaner design and has much stronger ties to the original design ethos than the 03. But then again those watches were $50k at one point while 5712's were also $20k-30k at the time. I don't think it's fair to criticize RM pricing and then praise the 5712 at it's current price since both have benefited from the same type of price action over the same period.
@OrlandoCorrea-k2i2 ай бұрын
Is the same tiffany letters i don't understan kanjar stamp and tiffany you have too pay a lot of money for the same watch😮
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
The Tiffany stamp I can understand more given the historical relationship, rarity and given it is stamped on the dial. Hope you enjoyed this 🙏
@keysersoze5032 ай бұрын
May I have a Campari on the rocks please.
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
Haha sure thing!
@bearclooneywatches4186Ай бұрын
I recently purchased PP Aquanaut 5167-A. I purposely purchased this time piece because it's Patek in steal, which makes jus so much more special. Also it gives me opportunity to enjoy this watch as a daily. To me this is a solidly built, multi-purpose and elegant piece. I also like simplicity of the watch, as it is very clear to me that luxury and refinement are hardest to achieve in simple forms. For example the dial which can look a bit simple and even boring on photos, shines with different lightings giving different appearances. At one point it is black, another moment it becomes grey or even silver. That's a real candy to the eyes. Polishing on the bezel is perfect. Movement is beautiful. This was and still is my favourite Patek and even though I understand your points, I think some of your justifications why this watch is overpriced are actually reasons why I chose this to be my first and possibly last Patek. Thanks for your video and keep the good work
@mikedonovan97832 ай бұрын
There are no watches offering value if they are sold above retail . I would even say that a lot of watches are not worth their retail price
@MarcoFerranteWatches2 ай бұрын
We all have different thresholds of what we are willing to pay so totally fair. Hope you enjoyed this video 🙏