Totally Irresponsible

The vast majority of our hunting, shooting and feral animal control work in Australia is done on the private freehold and leasehold land of landholders.
Time to make a personal decision people, do you go the full distance to protect your landholders and therefore your access to hunt/shoot or do you simply throw them under the bus?
For more information and to keep up to date with our up coming episodes visit www.australianwildcountryadven...

[@8marcrara11]

You are a good Man Clark and a Great custodian of the land and people of the land! ⚡️🇦🇺

[@peteacher52]

Well, Clark, you have taken the Clydesdale to water, but it will only drink if it has the brains to quench its thirst. With the possibility of decades in prison as a backdrop, your warning of entrapment was stunningly chilling.

[@DarrenBarrett-oy8yd]

Legend. This is world wide.

[@DarrenBarrett-oy8yd]

And all industries.

[@perigrine46]

As a WHS and OHS qualified person, what you are saying is absolutely 100% spot on. The chain of responsibility includes ALL parties involved, especially the Land owner, or lessee, to ensure all parties who access their property or properties, is up to speed with any dangerous activities that may be enacted whilst they are present on the property, and that also includes the conduct of the visiting party or parties while on that property. Its really so simple, conduct yourself in a safe manner, as you would on any industrial worksite. Don't drink while operating machinery, or shooting, no drugs, situational awareness, keep a safe distance from working machinery, etc, etc. An extremely valid and responsible video, thanks Clark. Just as a side note, the Govt Depts involved in these investigations after a death or serious injury has been recorded, have the ability to defy physics, and make shit flow UPHILL.

[@brainfreeze1925]

What is the rational for the land owner becoming criminally and civilly responsible for "visitors' " dumb behaviour? Going forward, why would any farmer allow hunters onto their land? Am I missing something?

[@ClarkMcGhiesWildCountry]

So well said. Those who will not listen, read this comment over and over.

[@perigrine46]

@@brainfreeze1925 I understand where you are coming from, but, and it’s a big but, the legislation has now changed through the “chain of responsibility “ so, as an example,if the land owner dug a trench out the back of woop woop and had someone come on the property and they drove into the trench and got injured or killed, the land owner would be charged because he did not erect warning signs or have flashing lights or some other precaution to stop someone from driving into the trench, even though the trench was on private property in the middle of nowhere. Someone would have to be held responsible. That’s just how it is all going these days. If the visitor to the property was killed, the property owner or manager would be facing Industrial Manslaughter charges for not ensuring the safety of the visitor. Crazy I know, but welcome to the reality of the law.

[@brianwalker1933]

What about trespassers and criminals actually being chased by police, either on foot or by a motorised vehicle? A "Pandora's Box" is being opened!! What a nightmare for the landholder.

[@65284]

Each person is responsible for what they do. That is not new. The farmer is not responsible for the wreckless conduct of a hunter

[@JT-py9lv]

Some people do not believe the iron is hot, until they burn their finger...

[@ozzyozzyozzyoioioi.7821]

Moral to the story some people are blind like the Ostrich with head in sand. You tried thats what counts. I Saw a farmer lose his farm through the legal fallout of a visitor getting run over and killed. Work safe found the farmer liable as he didnt have a desinated parking area for visitors even know the visitor WASNT invited onto the property.😢😢😢😢😢

[@mack1biz249]

Here's my understanding so far. If a person is accidently killed on a farm Work Cover will investigate and determine negligence. The farmer maybe assigned anywhere between 0-100% responsible. A farmer might be charged with industrial manslaughter, be fined or go to jail. Liability insurance company will be trying to minimise how much they have to pay out, which will be determined in court. A farmer is now by law a PCBU and must have the procedures in place to provide a safe work environment. They reduce their chance of negligence by providing Safe Work Methods, Emergency Response Plan etc The last line of defence for a farmer is their Farm Public Liability insurance (FPLI). There's only a couple of insurance companies that provide FPLI and I have recently confirmed via insurance broker they specifically exclude hunters. I love to hunt but would hate to see a farmer lose everything due to somebody else's negligence. Unfortunately the government is doing everything they can to abolish hunting and firearms. We must unite and fight this battle as one or it's all over.

[@ClarkMcGhiesWildCountry]

So well said. I wish some of the people who post on this comment section would read what you say, over and over until it sinks in.

[@dduckman1423]

Yep you are correct there is a lot of political ideology involved in this. I have let fox shooters onto my property for years it has now reached a point were I will say no admittance. What these clubs do not realize this is a way to stop hunting and what follows is hunting cannot be a reason to own firearms.

[@sierracharlie7293]

Rest assured the Insurance Companies will be across this. If their assessors find One Duck out of line, your claim will not be approved.

[@andrewprimmer3816]

Exactly right, farms are a work place , the same as factory in the city, or a coal mine. Times have changed . Farmer are liable for any person or persons who step foot on their property. The same as anyone entering your own private property.

[@martinward7239]

You can lead a fool to wisdom but you can't make them think

[@deanbrownq4650]

As a crane operator in construction and general hire the paperwork for both sides isnt that daunting... Once the landholder has their ducks in a row, and for the visiting hunter as simple as a brief induction to the workplace perhaps a short video of what you can and cant do and where you can and cant go.. Everyones credentials are checked, gun licence, car licence, proof of age, sign onto the swms, risk assessments... Each land holder will have specific rules about hunting in numbers and alot of site specific do's and dont's... I do this similarly everyday in my job... It will be the time before a hunt that everyone gets on the same page, meet the manager or land owner, show respect... These are all simple things that overtime will become normal and apart of the hunt..

[@mrpinify]

Spot on mate. There are a few conditions along the way to proving negligence.

[@fatherburning358]

Yep correct. As simple as that. The farmers just need to follow those simple things and boom arse covered. 👍

[@CraigSmith-yl8pg]

Good on you Clark! It blows my mind people are so ignorant to the facts/truth that is in front of them clear as day. Being a landholder and a hunter all of your information is very useful and people just need to have a bit more respect. That’s about all it boils down to. Don’t stop or give up Clark your a legend 👍

[@user-dz8wm8zh2o]

Well said Clark as a small land owner I agree with you and keep up the good work .love your weekly videos Al

[@rosemaryshepherdsmith5110]

This is another example of stupidity and greed. Not keen on the way this country is going. Good vid mate. 😊

[@peterlovett5841]

This is a flow-on from what happened about 30 years ago (possibly 40 years now) when property holders were told they were liable for injury to anyone on their property from hidden dangers. This led to the growth of hunters having to have personal liability insurance before being allowed to hunt on properties. Now the growth of personal injury litigation and some grievous examples of unsafe work practices it has led to the criminalisation of workplace injury. As a former safety manager for an aviation company we were required by the Federal Regulator to have a safety management plan in place. It was unfortunate that the regulator wanted a safety plan that was overly complicated and bureaucratic to make it easy for them to audit the company rather than have a useful asset. However, with the Commonwealth involved, they will ensure that all States come to the party; they did this with uniform traffic regulations and undoubtedly will do this with industrial safety legislation. Clarkie, the problem you describe is not so much on the hunter but on the property owner to have the necessary plans and notices in place. Unfortunately, what I see happening is for them to take the easy way out and just deny entry to the recreational hunter.

[@tony_cracka9851]

Exactly this

[@Pottz76]

Hello Clark, with regards to the video you shared on WHS. The upcoming investigation into the snake bite fatality in Townsville will surely be intriguing. The individual who tragically lost his life was not authorized as a snake catcher; however, he was reached out to by a family member and requested assistance in removing the snake from the premises of a childcare facility. My condolences to his family

[@matthewhanlon5556]

Great video clark so happy to be part of a group of self minded people thanks for all your hard work

[@ohmbre300]

Thank you for sharing Clark! Oh this is a very real thing.

[@maeleach3122]

Based on what youre saying the same risk applies to your mates coming over for a bbq. Magistrates and Judges have a common sense approach to ruling in these matters but at the same time have a wide reaching penalty to apply harshly when needed and not so when not needed.

[@michaelbrown6241]

No it doesnt unless it is a workplace social event organized by the employer, in that case the function does not even need to be on the property. If it was a family and friends get togther The WH&S act for the state would not apply, but if someone was being a D head and another got injured or died due to there neglegence I'm sure there will be a court case.

[@joshuabromilow9901]

Well done Clark for bringing this to light. This is important stuff

[@brettstevenson986]

Thanks 👍 Clarke mcghie very interesting..nice to get the heads up

[@rodgeorge7244]

Hi Clark over the years I've hunted a lot on private property doing feral reduction but there is no way I would do it now with all the Government bulltish I would rather just hunt on public land.

[@robsin2810]

There are none so blind, as those that will not see.

[@ZAN-THE-GOAT]

Clark is spot on. Love ya ❤

[@Mark-ew5jm]

Clark, both your passion and frustration regarding this subject is evident. I can hardly believe the energy some people waste trying to avoid rules and regulations….should the same energy be used for compliance, all would realise how well protected all could be regarding this new legislation. Thank you for caring so much about your industry Clark.

[@southerncross1941]

You are 1000% correct as I experienced in the early 90s almost losing my home; now, penalties today are are even more severe. I suggest all you add hock administrators take heed what Clark has expressed. Yes, there still some yobbos out there with firearms who have no concept of careless outcomes, and worse, are administrating shooting organizations with no knowledge of legal responsibilities which, does bring unwanted attention to our activities. Congratulations and thanks for raising this issue. However I do commend and express thanks those in shooting organizing roles that work hard to keep us safe.

[@jacktattis]

I was unaware that the land owner may be held responsible for something they are not involved in.

[@suntzuwarsword1964]

Thank you Clark for clarifying..handy information to have... sign of the times , noose is getting tighter...

[@brucetitchener9922]

Where does it stop, follow the money.

[@newto4361]

Go Clark,couple other points,redress was already available through common law and criminal codes in respective jurisdictions,and,"farmers can now receive penalties without an incident occurring",see story "Farm Safety: Ensuring a Secure Work Health & Safety Environment",plus,"some jurisdictions have re- examined the insurability of WHS penalties,and at least three jurisdictions have imposed prohibitions,including New South Wales, Western Australia and Victoria",from story "Industrial Manslaughter and the Heavy Responsibility for Business: The Path Forward".Cheers.

[@richardt.4224]

Well done and thank you for bring this to the peoples attention.

[@martywilson5522]

Great video Clark. Keep fighting the good fight. ❤😊 RTR

[@davidregazzoli1065]

Thank so much for the info mate your doing a great job people Need to know the facts. cheers

[@vincecarige4057]

Well said Clark. We at VET Centre (Qld) have been out working in the Pastural industry saying this in our training for a long time. The smart managers/CEOs of these Pastural companies have taken on board their WHS obligations. The Management that do not train/assess and certify staff and ensure that they have their compliance policies and procedures in place, will lose their houses and do time. As an ex law professor my wife writes these policies and procedures for SMEs.

[@ClarkMcGhiesWildCountry]

Thank you. It means a lot to get support like this after so many taking shots at me for speaking out. The fools who refuse to even listen, will bring us all down unless they change their ways.

[@jodiewalsh5682]

Unfortunately Clark even thou you are informing the people and clubs they will not do anything about it until it’s to late. Please keep doing what you’re doing. As for them dragging you name through the mud I would be looking at this really closely.

[@JamesBarker-pg6dx]

Thanks for the update allready sent to my lanndholder

[@sebastianhorbushko8703]

Well explained Clark, there's certainly a fare share of muppets out there.

[@hoyks1]

Its already in the WH&S law that if you are on a site where a business is being conducted that the business has a duty of care to ensure the safety of the people on that site, be the employees, customers or even trespassers. Someone visiting your farm and they flip a quad on a dodgy washout that you knew about, but didn't warn them about it, sign post it or have a traffic management plan, then its conceivable that someone will be held liable.

[@Sean-fb7cy]

Regards from IRELAND Long live common sense great content

[@EricaMTB]

Public liability insurance won't protect anyone from criminal charges. But a good safety system may not be enough to avoid charges too (although hopefully it avoids anything happening). It's pretty hard to say you provided and safe workplace when someone is dead.

[@jackdawg4579]

Oh, one fact you haven't mentioned - if you are found guilty of negligence, or under part of the WH&S legislation - any insurance is void. Insurance can not be provided for an illegal act

[@ClarkMcGhiesWildCountry]

Exactly. That was going in another clip

[@colinkarlson3829]

I am now retired, but for over 10 years I specialised in the Chain of Responsibility legislation. In respect to WHS a PCBU is responsible for workers and all visitors on property they control. Insurance is unlikely to cover you if there is reckless or negligence. A party can be prosecuted for what you do do and what you do not do. I repeat you can be guilty for what you do not do. In short there needs to be realistic risk assessments with appropriate actions. The actions are simply the policies and procedures. A policy is what you are going to do, a procedure is how you do it. with a proper Safe System there is no problem. Without one you are at risk. Simple -+=. Do the right thing.

[@ClarkMcGhiesWildCountry]

Spot on. The little volunteer group called RIDGE, has gone ahead and hacked out a path. SWMS, Emergency response procedures, Hazard risk register, inductions all within a very good admin system. They will make this available, hopefully at cost, to anyone interested in supporting them.

[@dduckman1423]

So basically if the farmer allows the hunters to use live ammo he will be responsible if someone gets shot.

[@anthonyburke5656]

You should point out, it’s NOT the activity of the victim that is the determinant, they could be a trespasser, it’s the action/inaction of the landholder

[@glenpierce777]

Ignoring health and safety legislation, and common sense in general, has led to the deaths of thousands over the years. Health and Safety is there to protect everyone, workers, employers, people enjoying recreational activities and landowners, the list is endless. People over the centuries have dies through lack of safety precautions because others just really don't give a feck or are trying to save a few quid. Like all workplace/environment legislation, it's not always perfect, but it's there for the protection of life in the main part. Good vid as always Clarkie mate. Stay safe and don't let the b'stards grind you down.

[@Moonbahmemories]

As a supervisor i was always conscious of my actions because of this legislation

[@dogman129]

Clarky, have you watched Hoody in the Senate for a future Royal Commission into you know what? Worth watching!!!

[@_Misso_]

Well said Clark, don’t back down mate!

[@user-ji2zb1vw6c]

Hey Clark! It is always said that you can’t fix stupid but keep trying you never know

[@1deerndingo]

Some people can't be told. Just because they don't agree with it then they ignore it.

[@vaughanellis7866]

In today's litigious society Landowners/Renters have to wallpaper their arses with the necessary legal paperwork to protect themselves and their business, Yes its a drain on time and money, but even if there is just one minor accident never mind God forbid a fatality, it is better to be prepared and ready to defend themselves, than do nothing and get run over by the 'Health & Safety' and Legal industries who are waiting to exploit any opportunity they called too.

[@edwardhaigh4249]

Good work Clark, even I can understand that.

[@tanner2stryker2]

Same in the uk there coming after farmers land owners and hunters full stop they want everyone off the land to either rewild or build across as in homes or windmill abd solar farms 🏡

[@dduckman1423]

That is the basis of it, to stop all hunting.

[@ObsidianKing]

Nothing wrong with rewilding.

[@silverlacedwyandotte6437]

Great informative video mate

[@65284]

Clark, As a former safety inspector, shooting association public officer and hunter, I see reason to take safety seriously but no reason for alarm. Insurance though useful will usually not cover wreckless conduct and will not protect a killer from time in jail. Paperwork procedures might be useful but these cannot paper over wreckless dangerous conduct by the manager of a business. Maybe you might like to communicate with me about what would be a reasonable degree of risk management.

[@andydickson6085]

Clarke I don’t know how it works in Australia but in the UK insurance does not cover you for criminal offences. Your insurance would cover you if someone claimed against you civilly, but if you’re taken to court for a criminal offence, then insurance counts for nought.

[@user-qi8ns1fo5d]

Both parties need PCBU plan for operation, then separate daily plan every time this take place. Not PCBU paperwork but training in firearms, first aid, other educational liking cert in agriculture as bases. First Aid kit, UHF, mobile phone, water, contact point sign are needed too for communication. I know this might be over top but there been cases. Just tick boxes, stay alert of your surroundings n hope you dont get F over.

[@davidperry640]

Hi Clarke, the is off topic for this video, but I saw an interesting thing being offer for trappers the other day. It's called PAPPUTTY. It is new and is a poison to replace the strichnine, which I thought was only used in WA on foot hold traps. I think this is being offered to other states and being listed as a better humane result for trapped animals...... Not so flash for the by catch animals that could normally be released without any harm. I hope the use of this doesn't become common practice!

[@timbrown8581]

Clark, thanks for your advice and wisdom. However mate, as you know, you can't educate idiots! Safety in the work place has far reaching effects. If you're on a working property, (no matter what your capacity) it's a work place! Plain and simple! The land owner not only has to have done something which may have contributed to the death but also by omitting to do something that would or could have prevented the death, they will be held accountable!

[@SMarkar14]

Thanks for this Clark. The only deer hunting group I will join when find the means will be the R.I.D.G.E group. Clark for PM. Regards Mark from Redlands.

[@longlowdog]

Here in the UK we are actually in the position where if someone is technically trespassing on your land and comes a cropper say by falling from a highseat the landowner is responsible for their welfare. The old trick of sawing halfway through one rung towards the top of the ladder to 'fix' thieves is now no longer an option. We'd be sued privately and punished criminally in such an event. Being hurt even in the commission of a crime gives you the right to sue the bloke you were trying to steal from. I'm far from convinced this is righteous law but it is the way the world is heading.7

[@AquaMarine1000]

Well said, Clark. Insurance can never make good a tragedy or indenify criminal negligence. Right or wrong, if someone dies, the full force of the law will be applied. Cheers

[@brucelonsdale8422]

Great work mate.

[@thebilboy6893]

Very interesting. I have had my concerns in the past about issues like this when talking with some shooters/hunters. Or even landholders. It will make access to property even rarer, and I can't blame the farmer. They have to look out for themselves. Can't risk idiots on their land saying all the right things to get their foot in the door. And once on, spending the night drinking and shooting. We all know it happens. Poor farmers end up up the creek because of idiots.

[@scobiesview5137]

So recreational fishing is also in the same situation as is walking your dog in the park?

[@glennllewellyn7369]

There’s a lot of mouthy Pitt Street hunters out there mate.

[@matthewryan2186]

Well said those land owners need to know the laws of the hunter's on their property as it needs to be addressed

[@calamarininjabeast5866]

Every employer has the obligation to provide a safe workplace. If a landowner is engaging you to control dogs, pigs, cats etc then you should be providing swms on how you’ll be undertaking the task in a safe manner

[@ClarkMcGhiesWildCountry]

If you are entering as an ABN feral control business maybe, however when you are entering as a volunteer recreational hunter, then the responsibility falls directly on the PCBU.

[@calamarininjabeast5866]

@@ClarkMcGhiesWildCountry sounds correct mate, if you don’t mind me asking what insurance policy do the farmers take out that covers this kind of activities?

[@JamesGreen-ud7di]

Cheers Clark

[@jamescarre6743]

As Tzu Sung said, " Time spent in reconnaissance is never wasted", so I would say Clark has done his and has issued a warning to the reckless, feckless and those who wish to deceive. As Vespasian said, " He who desires peace prepares for war". Clark, that was a very clear, "Heads up, the danger is out there" and how many other hunting clubs are unenlightened as well? Hopefully fewer after watching your video. Stay safe.

[@jacksrbetter1870]

I noticed no where is it mentioned that the use and implementation of common sense is essential, now these woke politicians, lawyers, and insurance companies feel that someone else HAS to be responsible for a individuals disregard of caution, common sense, and safety in whatever they are doing. You can't out think or fix stupid.. What ever happened to personal responsibility or accountability...By the proposed legislative logic, If I was to run naked and blindfolded on the highway during peak traffic hour and was struck and killed, the person who hit me, the automobile manufacturer, the builder of the highway and the people who actually installed the roadway would all be responsible for my ignorance and disregard for personnel safety? Brilliant..

[@paulsouth4794]

Stupid needs insurance like the rest of us . This is what you get with a user pays system. If You are hurt and in a wheel chair , is your family equipped to buy you a $20k mobility chair ? Or the nursing to bath and feed you ?

[@MarginalFarming]

Thanks Clark. I won't let any person onto my properties.. Anybody hurting themselves would be a trespasser. = Keep ya gates closed !

[@benjigray8690]

Our present government could be deemed "guilty" of causing harm, to millions of Australian citizens under this legislation. 1; They didn't warn us of the dangers of voting for them. 2; None of us have received any training about how to seal with this government. etc., etc.,etc.

[@charliepyle1626]

Just put up do not enter, or no unauthorised persons allowed. The same sign should go on city limits or western Sydney etc.

[@EgerGaming]

Well said mate

[@craigtomkinson2837]

Nice work

[@keithdixon3913]

well said

[@RandomRants525]

Howdy LEGEND! ISSHO is now in my vocabulary 👍. I am in SSAA for the insurance. My question is, could the land owner be covered under the THIRD PARTY component of the insurance. And would it have to be a shooting incident? Or are you covered as soon as you leave home and until guns are locked back up? Similar to workers comp, covered as soon as you go to then get back from work. Stay strong mate!

[@BenoniBen]

Clark...Those with the power want to lock in their power over you and me. It is their plan to create a system where we are their servants and own nothing.They will always be exempt from charges against themselves.

[@user-zt5if7vt8m]

Great now it will be even harder to access private property.

[@ClarkMcGhiesWildCountry]

Maybe not. Our small group has come up with a workable solution, which if accepted by hunters, would open up more land not close it off. www.theridgegroup.net

[@stevematalone2512]

Some people just don't get it. We went thru similar circumstances in the mines where if we didn't follow swms an a accident took place we could be held responsible in court aswell as managers and massive fines and or jail time

[@adammaddock453]

All over Oz we have to do swims and safe work introductions. Before any work can commence. We all love hunting so please do the Do the right thing by everyone.

[@ClarkMcGhiesWildCountry]

Well said. Plain and simple, do the right thing.

[@ProspectorswithParkinsons]

Thanks for sharing this Clarke, everyone has a right to return home to family uninjured.

[@rodmorris9690]

Looking forward is all well and good but one must follow through with forward action. If you are wicked smart and sharp as a tack with a college degree in law, a business opportunity has just landed at your feet, do not delay call Clark McGhie today. Farmers and ranchers (hunting guides and trappers as well) along with their insurance agents will need assistance with this new legislation. If that intelligent individual fails to contact you, seek him out immediately. Grandad always said, you fight fire with fire son. Good luck to you Sir, you will surely need it.

[@davidhandyman7571]

If that group wants to wait for a case to test the legality of what you are saying, do they want to be the one "to test it in court"? That could be expensive in many ways.

[@ClarkMcGhiesWildCountry]

What I have tried to tell them face to face and have been largely ignored, not by the guys in charge here in Qld but by those in other States who do not think our State exists.

[@davidhandyman7571]

@@ClarkMcGhiesWildCountry Hang in there Clark. People have learnt to "trust government" and do as they are told without thinking beyond the next meal. I am nearly 70 years young and have watched society disintegrate and dumb down. We can only do our bit. Blessings from NSW Central West.

[@mickwatson2177]

Well done trying to look after all parties in this world of legal minefields mate. Hate to see people being taken advantage of. It's not the individuals families that will go the landholder It's their insurance company so they're not the one's paying out. It's straightforward passing the buck. Cheers mate 👍 🐕 🤠

[@ClarkMcGhiesWildCountry]

Exactly. What the hunters sprucing about how good their insurance is simply do not get, is the once a serious accident or death occurs, it is out of their control. Only by protecting the landholders do we protect our hunting.

[@johnfranke9655]

Very sound advice, the know all's should take this on board and stop being smartarses, thanks Clark

[@maeleach3122]

If said farmer is paying you commercially to work on the property you would either be working under your company name or sole trader ABN. If a company or trust it would be your responsibility to have your own cover and the farmer should ask for current proof of insurance. If sole trader ABN, the employer/farmer must pay both your super and work cover... No ifs no buts. Both scenario's complete legal obligations. If someone drives in my driveway to the property and has an accident injuring or killing themselves, I would not be going to jail.

[@raylowry2505]

I suggest that this ONUS of responsibility might well extend to all landowners> Government reserves, duck swamps, State forests etc that allow hunting. Why should an individual farmer or a corporate body be any different to a State based access to hunting. In addition the State governments charge fees in the form of licenses and game stamps. Interested in any comments.

[@dduckman1423]

You are probably correct, the main reason is to stop hunting.

[@emp731]

Understood.. Thankyou for explaining that . Obviously the legislation that has been written that "unfairly" puts the property owners at risk legally is wrong..Do you agree?

[@ClarkMcGhiesWildCountry]

Not my place to say fair or not fair, just saying that it is. We all have a duty of care and the sooner hunters step up shoulder to shoulder with landholders the better we all will be. If we don't, landholders will shut the gate.

[@chrissamuel495]

Well that sucks. Why would landowners let us on to hunt then?

[@glennllewellyn7369]

Trust.

[@paulsouth4794]

They wont . Unless you sit down with them and complete a swims and rules and regulations.

[@dduckman1423]

I have let fox hunters onto my property for years but now I am at the point were I will have to refuse entry.

[@intimatespearfisher]

I wonder how the Matt Wright case will play out with this legislation

[@anthonyburke5656]

Not before Time

[@bishopkinlyside8477]

Hi Clark, thank you for informing with the truth I will say it again the truth someone needs people need to wake up and smell the roses. I work for a guy in 2018 and he forced all these documents which cost me $1 million and I lost a leg plus a lot of fuse back etc etc I won’t go into it but keep up the good work really your videos

[@ZEGOAT-pe6pp]

Well said Clark, it's unfortunate to think that their are still cowboys out there thinking their immune to the law.

[@tinytedy]

Wasnt this video put up before?

[@waynemorgan5017]

Keep up the Good Fight Clark, the Labor Government will Try Anything to get into our pockets. Stay Strong.

[@olivier8264]

are there no laws requiring to have roll bars on quads or tractors, they can/could help.

[@Bennie32831]

It benefits corporate to have a set price for you life they have the best ✌️

[@rupertmcnaughtdavis3649]

NANNY STATE.

[@ClarkMcGhiesWildCountry]

The message I am trying to spread is that the other States are following close behind with the same level of control.

[@jeaniepecats419]

Leave our dingoes alone.

[@wambatmqn3833]

How do i know if i have their great insurance if you dont tell me who they are 😂

[@dionboothby7085]

I'm confused by the comments of the insurance aswell, Clark has spoken several times on there been no insurance out there that covers recreational hunters and the land owners, but in this instance says its a great insurance.. confusing