Trust These Three Translations!

[@MatthewEverhard]

Hey everyone, I would be very honored if you would please check out my new book Souls: How Jesus Saves Sinners - amzn.to/3A31Bgb

[@edbeckerich3737]

The pre-orders are shipping, mine has come in. My favorite translation is the one God uses in my life

[@LittleLouieLagazza]

Just ordered it using the provided link

[@Praise___YaH]

Guys, HERE is The Savior YaH The Heavenly FATHER HIMSELF was Who they Crucified/Pierced for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF” From the Ancient Egyptian Semitic: "Yad He Vav He" is what Moshe (Moses) wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3) Ancient Egyptian Semitic Direct Translation Yad - "Behold The Hand" He - "Behold the Breath" Vav - "Behold The NAIL"

[@PastorJeremyCollins]

Excited to dig into it. 👍🏻

[@nicholasgeorge7825]

Shameless self promotion. Go bro.

[@billkunert7281]

I found the KJV a bit hard to understand prior to being saved. Since then it is much easier to understand. I got saved in 1977 and started reading the Bible every day. I've read the Bible through every year for at least 30 years and it's very comfortable and understandable. I really believe the Holy Spirit gives understanding.

[@InterdimensionalCabal]

what does it mean to be saved?

[@helgapenzhorn796]

​@@InterdimensionalCabalto be saved is to repent from your sins and to believe in Jesus Christ as your Saviour and Lord. Then you have been saved from your sins and from satan and hell. Jesus says: He who believes in Me has eternal life which means he will live forever in the delightful presence of God. When we are saved God makes us new. We are born-again.

[@bridonbutcher8845]

@@helgapenzhorn796 Acts 2:38-39,46-47 KJV Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. **[39] For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.** [46] And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart, [47] Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily **such as should be saved.** the plan of salvation hasn't changed, it is only through repentance and baptism in Jesus Christ name.

[@Rev22-21]

You might recall in 1 Corinthians it mentions that the word of God is spiritually discerned and it is the Holy Spirit that helps us understand it. 😊

[@soybeanzzzz]

@@InterdimensionalCabal 1 John 1:9 KJV If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. You see, Jesus Christ is the only one who has the credentials to meet God's requirement that we must be perfect, or that a perfect man die in our place, in order to live with God and actually "do life' with God for eternity. Salvation is truly a gift from God. Even the faith to believe in Him is a gift from God, lest anyone should boast about the good decision they made. Just asking the question: "What does it mean to be saved?" is an indication that God is presently working on your heart; preparing it for salvation. And I hope that is a wonderful comfort to you. And how is it that Jesus Christ is qualified? How is it that he meets the stringent requirements set forth by God? Well, first off, the Bible says that the sins of the fathers are passed on from generation to generation through the (earhtly) father. So the original sin from Adam and Eve forward is passed on through the man. And since no man can be perfect, God himself condescended himself to somehow miraculously be the seed that impregnated Mary(a virgin with a pure heart) so that she could give birth to a sinless man, Jesus Christ. So Jesus Christ was fully man while remaining fully God when he died on the cross to pay for the sins of those who believe that he died a substitutionary death for those of us who believe in Him. Romans 10:9 declares: That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.

[@CruxSacraApologetics]

0:00 Introduction 1:49 Credentials 5:48 Translation #1 9:51 Translation #2 13:39 Translation #3 16:06 Other Translations 20:34 Closing Remarks

[@Edward-b3r]

VERY HELPFUL! Thank you!

[@andrewasante1164]

God Bless You

[@muzzammilpervaiz5296]

Thankyou so much, dear.

[@Josephamac]

Thank you! Hero 🫡

[@Srinivas7]

Thank you Brother

[@richardlively1666]

Whats important is not just reading it, but living it....dare I say a harder but more rewarding task

[@BMEULTRAMAGA24]

Well said 🙂

[@vainot4u]

Wow! Such power in that short statement!!

[@8thMusketeer]

What's with the 666 in your name?

[@richardlively1666]

@@8thMusketeer I dont know you tube just assigned it to me... BUT I DONT LIKE IT

[@8thMusketeer]

@@richardlively1666 Weird. It won't go away? Even if you change you're username?

[@lmsiv5829]

1. King James Version 2. New King James Version 3. English Standard Version

[@Yeshua_Ha_Mashiac]

Below, are some of the verses I've discovered are deleted / missing from ESV and NIV. Side note: A "real" modernization of the KJV is the MEV. Modern English Version. That doesn't have the below verses deleted. "Philip said, “If you believe with all your heart, you may.” He answered, “I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.” Acts 8:37 MEV "in whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins:" Colossians 1:14 MEV "But this kind does not go out except by prayer and fasting.” Matthew 17:21 MEV Altered: "Study to show yourself approved by God, a workman who need not be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth." 2 Timothy 2:15 MEV

[@zakstarkiller1850]

@@Yeshua_Ha_MashiacPlease learn more about Bible scholarship before you speak on this matter. The KJV is not the only correct Bible

[@jovannyrivera1506]

@@Yeshua_Ha_MashiacNKJV have them all what you talking about bro

[@carolbattle8010]

thanks

[@SR-iy4gg]

The KJV is notorious for having translation errors.

[@sharonshoop495]

For me as an 81 year old widow, I memorized so much as a child and adult from the KJV. I read from the others but I go back to the KJV so as not to mess up my memorization.!!!!!!

[@glennpesti6519]

Same here

[@scottsprowl7484]

KJV all the way for me too. Too many changes in other versions

[@deanarjones9114]

Me too

[@nicholasgeorge7825]

Me too, and then I go back to it, and find out what's in my head isn't really King James, but something close.

[@daveneh8047]

KJV is the WORST.

[@SusanRichardsDay]

I got born again reading King James . Holy Spirit is our teacher and leads us into all truth .

[@joshuacrosby8176]

It was the HS that convicted and converted you, not the particular translation you were holding when He did it.

[@SusanRichardsDay]

@@joshuacrosby8176 I agree , just kinda amazing how God makes His Word alive in us and Holy Spirit interprets it for our soul.

[@oshea2300]

@@joshuacrosby8176 those modern perversions are not quick powerful and sharper than any two-edged sword. Their butter knives and they're dead. Yes you can get saved reading one, but they have no power.

[@chevyyyyyyy]

You know that KJ was gay, right?

[@therookiefisherman5234]

Who was king James and why is there a bible with the name of a king?

[@sk-un5jq]

Psalms and the Gospel of John are incredible in KJV. Nothing else comes close to the majesty, beauty, and power for those two books.

[@lymphomasurvive]

Douay-Rheims

[@STROND]

Apart from the fact that it REMOVES Gods name from nearly all the places where it was in the first place !

[@nigelmcculloch3746]

Yes, very true, and it uses a language not in use today, Jesus never spoke like that, and he used God's name Jehovah when quoting scripture

[@slightlyopinionated8107]

No Hebrew speaker uses Yahweh or Jehovah when they read the text. Yahweh is the Tetragrammaton of the name of God which has been lost because they never said it.

[@nigelmcculloch3746]

@@slightlyopinionated8107 it's good that you recognize that the name Jehovah is referring to God, but before we launch into a debate remember that the name Jesus is accepted as meaning God's son even though most people know that his disciples never called him that, even the name yeshua would of been pronounced differently then than what we would say it. Do you think the ancient nation of Israel could be trusted to preserve God's name after having his son put to death?

[@oshea2300]

I was a junkie and I learned how to use/apply/ read a King James Bible in jail. The Holy Ghost taught me. The Holy Spirit will show you what peradventure means. And wot not means. That's why back in the day they used to use the King James Bible to teach people how to read. When they teach you to read, they teach you to use context clues. We know how important Bible context is. If God's word is important and preserved, why would you change it and update it. Why wouldn't you update your minds to learn it instead of looking for perversions, and watered down paraphrases.

[@miketatreau2347]

I don't know what other influences you've had, but you managed to get sucked into the cultish mindset of King James Onlyism. What you don't seem to understand is that the original writings of Scripture are what God inspired-not the King James translation or any other translation for that matter. But if you want the most accurate English translation, you should read the 1995 NASB.

[@greatbriton8425]

@@miketatreau2347 The NASB is based on the corrupted Critical Text, see "THE WORDS OF GOD: KJB or Modern Bibles?"

[@greatbriton8425]

100% agreed. The Lord led me to the King James and it changed my life. After a few months my sister asked me, are you reading the Bible a lot? You've changed. Of course I had to get used to the thees and thous but it was so easy, and the spirit that arose from the KJV was like a drink of water I had to keep coming back to. BTW Thou thee thy thine are just the singular form of You ye your yours, like I me my mine are the singular of Us we our ours. The T words fell into disuse because the King used to use the royal 'we' (the people) and his courtiers started calling him 'you' instead of 'thou'. This spread as a politeness to lords and ladies and finally down to all folk, until thee and thou became an insult to use, as we see in Shakespeare where one character says to the other, "Dost thou 'thou' me, thou dog!" When I next read my old Bible, the NIV, it was cold and in fact snake-like. I am not joking. The King James Version 1769 is God's ordained translation, his perfect word, preserved for us today. See "Irrefutable Proof in 60 min: The KJB Superseded Hebrew and Greek" and many others from Truth is Christ

[@michelletidler6773]

@@miketatreau2347 whats the NASB? Is that short for New American Standard Bible?

[@miketatreau2347]

@@michelletidler6773 Yes

[@CornerTalker]

0:00 Intro Material 1:50 Credentials 5:25 The Three 16:07 Other Good Choices

[@chickensauce85]

thank you so much

[@fredmcmurray6308]

thanks for doing this

[@bartleby1807]

Very helpfull. Thanks.

[@danniequesenberry9951]

Well buddy l like how discuss the choices of different bible's.........up front with everybody and to me you got it exactly right when brought out the choice of the King James Bible........ to me that is the one and only Holy Bible......... for my opinion we don't any updated Bible and we don't need any add on Bible or book's or literature of any kind.,........ the King James Bible has all the information all True and all the Truth that any and everybody needs to get saved and to stay saved and to me that's the main purpose of having the Bible to begin with.........

[@danniequesenberry9951]

And further more my Bible ........The King James Bible tells about what could happen to you if you add to or take away from the words of this book......and believe me God is not talking about a walk in the park........or not getting a cocoa cola and chocolate cake.........God is very serious.......... people go to messing around with The Holy Bible.........King James.........lt could cause a lot of souls to go to hell........in my opinion.........ln my opinion .......lm proned to believe that a lot of people in this world just want to change things in this world.......l don't believe that everything in this world needs changing......lf you change everything in this world then l believe that you take away the stability of and from this world.........

[@jenniferwoodville2552]

It's aways been funny to me when people say the KJV is too hard to read/understand. I can remember being four years old, sitting in my dad's lap as he taught me to read using the KJV. It's been my bible for 39 years and continually amazes me with the beauty and simplicity with which is was written. I'd encourage anyone to give it a chance. You'll be surprised at how easy it is to read.

[@eclipsesonic]

I love and grew up with the KJV like you did, but I totally get where people are coming from when they say that it's not the easiest to understand. It's not just the thee's, thou's and thine's (which would throw anyone off, who's not familiar with Shakespearean English), but also the occasional sentence structure, the archaic words and the false friends present (words that we still use today, but they have a completely different meaning than what they had back in 1611).

[@grantsmythe8625]

@@eclipsesonic Agreed. I also grew up with the KJV but prefer the RSV or NRSV but to each their own.

[@Dwayneff]

the only issue I have with the KJV is that some words had a different meaning back in 1611. For example Hebrew 4 verse 12: For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two edge sword, piercing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of thoughts and intents of the heart. Now, I thought quick meant fast, but doing research it actually means alive. Which is why I was thinking for buying the NIV version but found some very interesting information that made me second guess it so I'm looking to buy a New King James Version with updated english language.

[@VRcation]

It’s also inaccurate and has opened the door for things like Calvinism to exist for augments 1 Corinthians 1:18 from “being saved” to “been saved” Also in John 1:18, changes the word God to Son. Without context, crazy to not call Jesus God when it literally does in the original Greek. Craziest example is 1 Corinthians 1:18 though which now opens the debate of “can you lose your salvation?” The verse literally says “being saved” meaning that you that salvation in a verb not an adjective. - someone who went to a KJV only college and absolutely destroyed professors. I can’t tell you how many times my questions in class were answered with just “ask me about that after class”

[@SuperKvlogs]

Easy to read, but doesn’t mean it’s easy to understand and comprehend.

[@monstertruckfan8450]

The NKJV is the only one that I've found that capitalizes He, Him, His, etc. which I find very respectful.

[@dank4254]

NASB does, too

[@Peaches-ym9ws]

Provides clarity, too, when the passage is of the "he said / He said" type.

[@edcarson3113]

And you lose out on dual applications of the verse. The King James Holy Bible has it right.

[@sk-un5jq]

I like that too. There are newer KJV versions that do it as well.

[@Lost_n_Found_1]

@@edcarson3113 No, it doesn't.

[@Jesusismyonething]

I grew up KJV and started memorizing with that translation as a child. Now, at 60+, my go to translations are NKJV & ESV. I tried to love the NASB but keep coming back to my tried and true. Every year I switch to a different version for my annual reading plan and this year is the NIVUK. It’s refreshing but I can’t wait to get back to my NKJV.

[@RonaldJohnson-zr8vh]

I appreciate your comments on this. People often need a simple approach. I did take a couple semesters of Biblical Hebrew. Certainly not nearly enough, but it did give me a great appreciation for the challenge translators face. My normal reading version is NASB - I have become accustomed to reading the portions that use the "thee-s and thou-s" instead as modernized words. I use the Key Word Study Bible because it contains Hebrew and Greek dictionaries. What I recommend for others - who will not be studying Hebrew and Greek, is this ... Fundamentally, recognize there is a big difference between READING the Bible and STUDYING the Bible. Bible STUDY will get us blessing after blessing. But even for serious Bible students, we should not forget we all need at times to put the study versions and tools down and just pick up the Bible and READ and READ and READ. You will fall in love with reading the Bible and NOT want to stop! For reading - find a mainline version that is readable for you. Sounds simplistic, but it is truly important. So the version for reading is not so technically important as it may be for studying. Now, for studying, My advice is different. FIRST, start with an interlinear seriously!. I know of one available free online: Interlinear Scripture Analyzer from Scripture4all.org is freely downloadable. They tell you what original sources they use. But I find the greatest benefit to me is it makes me very aware of words in the original language. You get to see how the syntax and grammar is very different from English. Sometimes the words are similar enough the meaning is recognizable to me as an English speaker. But keep at it and you will come across some verses where you will shake your head and be very thankful there were translators to turn it into readable English. Hopefully you will join me is thinking that bickering over the ENGLISH words is futile. Then consider the element of copyright restrictions. There is a limit to how many English words can be used in the same order before a publishing house would be guilty of plagiarism. SECOND, compare the translations of several versions. Use BibleGateway.com's parallel function. Since there is no perfect "Word for word" translation of Biblical Hebrew or Biblical Greek into English, by comparing many, we are more likely to be exposed to the alternate shades of meaning these languages contain. Revealing alternate shades of meaning was a goal of "The Amplified Bible". And it is a worthy alternate to consider. Try it in BibleGateway.com to see how your favorite passages would look. THIRD, for Old Testament passages, be sure to also consider the Septuagint (LXX). The Septuagint is a Greek version of the Hebrew Scriptures which was translated a few hundred years before Jesus. As a new believer (a long time ago) when I saw the OT being quoted by NT authors, I would look up the cross- referenced OT passage and read it in the OT. But many times there were significant differences between the OT passage and the NT quote. For example, look at Acts 2:25-28 and compare to Psalms 16:18-11. OK, they are quite similar, but why the differences? NT Authors were usually already writing in Greek. So the OT they used was not the Hebrew Scriptures, but the LXX. FOURTH, Our brains absorb information differently when we READ versus when we HEAR. I had the Bible on CD for listening as I drove. There were times I would HEAR something that I felt was different from what I was familiar to having READ. Later when I would look up the passage to read it I would see the audio recording was accurate after all. So there is a benefit to listening to the Bible in the car AS WELL AS reading our Bibles. FIFTH, Regardless of which version we choose, the most important thing of all is to Read and Read and to keep Reading!

[@brendamoore1190]

@RonaldJohnson-zr8vh: “Read, read, and keep reading” is key! Your notes are interesting and helpful. Thx!

[@World_So_Cold]

Thank you very much!

[@MyPhilemon6site]

KJV vs ESV A simple test on how a translation treats the deity of Jesus Christ…. 1 Timothy 3:16 ESV- “Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness: He was manifested in the flesh, vindicated by the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.” KJV- “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. “ Notice the ESV and may I add NASB, NIV, New World Translation (JW’s Bible) Omitted “God” for “He”! “He” could be anyone , me, you, or anyone else! (Example: I was manifested in the flesh when I came into this world; I was vindicated in the spirit when I was born again; I am seen of angels then and now, etc) The King James Version specifically states that Jesus is God! Now the “Spirit of truth” would not testify otherwise!

[@user-lf4kf9oh4s]

Great post in addition to the video, thanks! I agree listening to the Bible and reading it are quite different experiences! I often listen to a version on Audible as I have young children and don’t have much peace to sit down and read. It has been a God-send 😁🙏

[@GrahamL-v8d]

Acts 2:25-28 quotes Psalm 16:8-11 (18-11 is simply a typo)

[@robertmcvicar5824]

Christian for 40years and am a King Jimmy man. It's slows us down when we read it. We have to think about what we're reading also when we quote it most will know it's the bible. Also displays the glorious doctrines of grace crystal clear.

[@Hyvelez]

King Jimmy man. Love it XD

[@robertmcvicar5824]

KJ it's magnificent Ptl.

[@Aaron-hype]

I’ve heard from the Lord so much in the KJV. The Amplified original (classic) explains what the meaning behind what the KJV describes in single words. I.e. “love.” What kind of love? Agape? Romantic? Brotherly? “ Peter, do you ‘love’ me?” That word the KJV and NKJV as “love,” isn’t the same in all three occurrences, as they would portrait. The Greek proves this. “The third time, He uses “phileō,” whereas the first two, “agape.” Both King James will NEVER open your eyes to this. Amplified is a good version that gives the context where single word usages fail. Be blessed saints. 🙏

[@robertmcvicar5824]

@@Aaron-hype Hi Aaron that was interesting what you said and will take it on board and I knew about the different kinds of love in the Greek. I'm not against other versions but I'll always be a mainly a king Jimmy man. I love God's word it's my daily bread. God bless

[@Aaron-hype]

@@robertmcvicar5824 funny thing about bread when Jesus is tempted in the wilderness, and quotes the OT where “Man my not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.” Many think this “word” He mentions is the Scriptures? It’s not. That’s the “logos,” not the “rhema.” (One is the written word ‘logos’ the other a spoken word ‘rhema’). KJV and NKJV will NEVER reveal this to us. It would be more accurately said as, “Man may not live by bread alone but by every freshly spoken word of God.” I use fresh loosely to emphasize a spoken word ‘in the moment.’ This is from my own research and study in His Word. I believe the Spirit guides us and prompts us when we run across things like this. They aren’t heretical, but it really brings things alive and is food for our souls. Bless you brother

[@bear-headstudios1212]

I was gifted a KJV Bible from the 1920s , I just love reading it.

[@DonnaStevens-hs4uv]

cool

[@marcusburnettsr8911]

I had hard time with KJV coming to christianity late in life. So I came across the NASB and truly like it. Since then the NKJV was released so I’ve been using it. These are my 3!

[@teresafarrell6457]

Agree on the NASB! Great stuff. 👍 I was brought up on KJV, so that's the only reason I enjoy it and I keep a Webster's Collegiate handy too. 😄

[@cryptojihadi265]

The NASB is the most literal translation and the most Christian vs Secular translation.

[@greatbriton8425]

The NASB is based on the corrupted Critical Text, see "THE WORDS OF GOD: KJB or Modern Bibles?" The King James Version 1769 is God's ordained translation, his perfect word, preserved for us today. See "Irrefutable Proof in 60 min: The KJB Superseded Hebrew and Greek" and many others from Truth is Christ

[@umarae27]

I like the 1995 a lot.

[@marcusburnettsr8911]

@@umarae27 Got the 2020 recently. Still adapting.

[@caleb5498]

I just started reading NLT I’m new Christian I have found god

[@ubyy1]

Okay number one.... He was educated by fools, graduates an educated fool. If you're learning from someone who doesn't know what they're talking about they're going to pollute your brain. Number two, not all bibles are translated from the same text. There is a text that comes out of Alexandria Egypt, and one that came out of the church of antioch. If you want to find out if your Bible is a fake.... Find it online and do a search for morning star. Read all of those verses and tell me who each one is talking about.... God is not the author of confusion.... Jesus Christ and Satan are not the same.... Go to First John 5:7.... Is your Bible talking about the Holy trinity of God? Or is it talking about some blood water and whatever. Does Bible teaches Christ is God and that he created all things? If not you have a Fake Bible regardless of how or who you learn to translate from. If you want to learn god's real word all you need is God's real word and the Holy Spirit of God to teach you.

[@tracyannpardue1530]

Welcome! Welcome! I myself can find the Bible overwhelming. Like it takes time.

[@frugal9065]

The bible is a collection of stories its not actually true

[@mikeortiz9664]

@@frugal9065listen to your self

[@angeldotel5786]

@@frugal9065you’ll find out sooner than later that it is :)

[@ladybugmom10]

I’ve always used the KJV. For me it feels the most authentic and not modernized or watered down.

[@jwatson181]

Agreed. It is the same English the apostle Paul used.

[@vanmamawannabe6360]

@@jwatson181Oh wow, I’ve never heard that before. Where did you learn that?

[@jwatson181]

@@vanmamawannabe6360 I was reading Paul's letters in the KJV. Paul used old English.

[@vanmamawannabe6360]

@@jwatson181 sorry, I must have stated my question stupidly. I’m asking where you learned that Paul spoke old English, not just a restatement that he did. Can you show me a scholarly study on languages that shows that some form of English was used in the first century, because I can’t find one. Most will say that old English came into use in the fifth century. So again, my question is: who told you or where did you read that Paul spoke old English?

[@jwatson181]

@@vanmamawannabe6360 I had a dream.

[@robchesley4591]

I like to "feel" like I'm reading the word.. I like reading the KJV in firelight. It's like spiritual therapy ..

[@MrThatWatchman]

Holy Ghost Grief, You have grieved God I felt the grief of the Holy Spirit, it was deep and sorrowful. God is sad because people have replaced Him with the bible and reject the Living Christ. kzbin.info/www/bejne/o5qZk4x6a6l7fdk

[@VRcation]

It’s also inaccurate and has opened the door for things like Calvinism to exist for augments 1 Corinthians 1:18 from “being saved” to “been saved” Also in John 1:18, changes the word God to Son. Without context, crazy to not call Jesus God when it literally does in the original Greek. Craziest example is 1 Corinthians 1:18 though which now opens the debate of “can you lose your salvation?” The verse literally says “being saved” meaning that you that salvation in a verb not an adjective. - someone who went to a KJV only college and absolutely destroyed professors. I can’t tell you how many times my questions in class were answered with just “ask me about that after class”

[@captainandrew016]

@@VRcation right, because you have some 'authority' on these things. In what way is the KJV inaccurate? You give me a verse and I will PROVE to you that you are wrong. The greatest failings that can happen to Christians is misreading the Word in order to exalt yourself. So you go back to the 'original' Greek and Hebrew, and tell me God made a mistake in the english translations. I'll tell you He didn't. Or you can save yourself the trouble and burn Wescott and Hort's modern garbage.

[@dulls8475]

@@captainandrew016 Westcott and Hort the fathers of the poor modern wretched translations.

[@kevincourtney7312]

@@captainandrew016 Are you aware that the KJV came from the Catholic church and the later translations came from ancient manuscripts found in the North African desert that were untouched by the Catholic church? Textus receptus doesn't mean that it was transmitted directly from God, it means received text provided by a priest named Erasmus of Rotterdam. Calvin was using the same texts that the KJV translators used as he also came out of the Roman church.

[@victoryak86]

Finally a modern Christian pastor/scholar who does not dismiss the KJV. I absolutely love it for all of the reasons he lists, though I do not say it is the only one we should use as he also is not saying. But for me it is the best.

[@DianeBianchi_MnWx]

I love my KJV. There are times when I pull out the NKJV to read, but within a couple of chapters I go back to the KJV, for the beauty and movement and the three-dimensional feeling I get from the sentence structure, if that makes sense.

[@deniss2623]

Interestingly described, Diane!

[@michaelsburger665]

Why in the world would these 2 bibles call Jesus as God's servant, this is wrong, so you do not know about this???? we as Christians know that Jesus is the Son of God, can anyone deny this fact, no, Jesus is God's Son, now you call out the NKJB precise translation, sorry you are wrong then why do the NKJB and the NIV state the following they are both corrupt NKJB Acts 3:13 The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the God of our fathers, glorified His Servant Jesus, whom you delivered up and denied in the presence of Pilate, when he was determined to let Him go. Acts 3:26 To you first, God, having raised up His Servant Jesus, sent Him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from your iniquities." NIV Acts 3:13 The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the God of our fathers, has glorified his servant Jesus. You handed him over to be killed, and you disowned him before Pilate, though he had decided to let him go. Acts 3:26 When God raised up his servant, he sent him first to you to bless you by turning each of you from your wicked ways.”

[@Daegdon]

KJV is a very deep experience which connects with my soul most profoundly.

[@tmactable]

The best Bible is the one you’re reading and studying every day.

[@jamesbarksdale978]

Amen! As long as it falls within Orthodox Christianity. There are some heretical versions out there that intentionally skew the Christian Faith.

[@tuvoca825]

Except for the CCP revision. It's a blatant and willful corruption. Very disturbing... and entertaining to people who know better. What a shameful corruption! Communist leadership should never be in charge of any church ever. They can't seem not to corrupt it.

[@ubyy1]

if it is real and accurate....most are not. Remember Satan is The Great Deceiver. Remember what Satan did in the Garden of Eden? He took God's word and he twisted it. And he caused man to fall into sin. Satan has not changed his tactics at all. He's a liar and a Deceiver there is no truth in him. Not all bibles are translated from the same text. One text came out of any of the church at Antioch. Mini Bibles of translated from a text that came from Alexandria Egypt. Egypt was a picture of sin and worldliness through the Bible. God had Moses lead his people out of Egypt. Satan is trying to lead people back into Egypt. Search your Bible for the words Morningstar. Find out Who each of those verses are talking about. Some of them were talking about Satan and later on they're talking about Jesus Christ. You have a fake Bible. The first John 5:7 about the Holy Trinity. God the Father God the word / son, and God the Holy Spirit. You have a fake Bible.

[@ronwilliams329]

@@sqearly That reasoning does work when one uses the New World Translation :)

[@seanobrien2306]

@@ronwilliams329 Hi, Everyone..., A ( CULT ) Bible, known as the Jehovah's Witnesses, and their own writing titled: "New World Translation". * It is ( NOT ) a real Holy Bible and many scriptures have been altered or changed and or omitted. * Please..., stay away from this dangerous ( CULT ) and you won't be hurt by their many punishments' and rules and regulations. Sincerely in Christ.., "Semper Fi" Mike in Montana :)

[@Gospelmama1940]

I am not Reformed nor Presbyterian (Southern Baptist born and bred1) but I really enjoy your videos! I have so many different translations and a few paraphases but I didn't know there was anything other than KJV until probably 10 years after I was born again. And I find that I feel so "at home" with my KJV and the NKJ helps me with places that are not so easily processed these days. Thank you for being God's faithful servant!

[@marcovau4902]

Well you can be Southern Baptist and kind of Reformed, just like Albert Mohler, f.e. I highly appriciate him.

[@Foggybottom45543]

Are you still SBA?

[@AmyC-o3p]

Thank you Pastor Matthew, those are my translations too!I memorized the Psalms from KJV, beautiful flow and understanding!!! Praise The Lord Jesus Christ 🙏

[@mattblackburn3791]

Thank you for this enlightening video. I have grown up reading mostly the NKJV, NIV, and NRSV, but have found the KJV and ESV later in life and enjoy them both for different reasons. I did what you said and just read Psalm 90 from the King James out loud, slowly, and meditatively. I am 11 days away from the one year anniversary of my mother's death at the age of 78 and the threescore and 10 and fourscore verse really teared me up. As someone who has struggled with the church for the past 5 years or so but still remaining faithful in private devotion, I really needed that reminder from our Lord in Psalm 90 about using my time here on Earth wisely. God's peace my brother in Christ.

[@helenakinnunen3070]

Try Complete jewish Boble

[@carolynenochs9139]

I am sorry for your loss. I do have a question about the ESV. It is one I was considering for my study Bible. What do you like about it that translation and what makes it different than the rest.

[@c0rndog748]

@@carolynenochs9139I have the ESV thinline and ESV study heirloom Bible from crossway, the Esv is very very good since its word for word translation. That makes it true to original text, and makes it great for study material as it’s more text book like than poetry like as some other thought for thought translations or the KJV for instance. (Those bibles are still great, just harder to use and understand from a study point of view)

[@938quilt]

I like the KJV as it makes me slow down and 'explain' passages as i go along. plus it's beautiful and helps me keep it reverent and I love the connection to the saints it has - for centuries it's all people used

[@LittleLouieLagazza]

Hadn't thought of approaching the KJV that way before. Thank you!

[@glorifythyname7777]

It's God's pure words

[@leonardhunt7241]

Oftentimes I think the KJV was put together with more prayer than some others, but I continue to use the Interlinear Bible and Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance with Hebrew and Greek dictionaries.

[@resetsetmefree478]

@@LittleLouieLagazza yes the older English versions like that really make you pause and study it more in depth. I can see why many churches use the KJV for services , people like the sound of the old Thee and Thou

[@dkgrace6743]

@@resetsetmefree478 It's not the sounds of the thou's and thee's, it's their meanigs. kzbin.info/www/bejne/mZmwfKmGnNOMqbs&ab_channel=BelieveTheBible

[@jameswallace-ls2fc]

December 2021, my wife I decided we needed to strengthen our weak Bible knowledge. We read Bible in a year, every day in 2022. It was the NIV, which while glad we read it, wasn’t what we were looking for. This year we are both reading Bible in a year NKJV. Love it. My hunger for more word grew ferocious last fall & I bought a nice KJV, had never spent extensive time in it, it’s amazing. In January I added David Nortons New Cambridge Paragraph Bible. Love them both. Using the Bible in a year format I felt the room for one more a day; earlier this month I added my 2001 ESV. I was pleasantly surprised when I watched your video by the triangle. My wife added an NASB 95, I might add an NASB 77 to my mix. When I die I want to go to Heaven with a solid grasp on The Word. God bless you.

[@rebeccaherron3789]

I use all three also. I am slow, lol, repetition helps so much.. Thank you for your input.

[@karenboyd6293]

I am one of the souls that Jesus saved, when I was a 22yo married college student!! It still brings tears to my eyes. It was 1973 and KJV was the MAIN Bible in the church I attended. I taught in a Christian School and that was the version we used. I believe that learning to read KJV really helps with brain vebal developement of the brain. In fact when I was in elementary school and Bible reading was included we memorized things from the KJV. However I was always confused by Psalm 23, but as a 1st grader I wondered why the three girls:Shirley, Goodness, and Mercy, were following him around. As as a very new Christian I began trying to read a new translation/paraphrase, every year. Most of them have faded into obscurity. But then the NIV came out and I still love the 1984 version, whiich is falling apart. My next favorite was ESV. As a young woman, even in the 60's and 70's, the masculine language in Bibles did not bother me, one I started actually reading them. I am a mild feminist, but I hate when people ruin great writing in an attempt to be PC. Such as rewording the Carol, Let Chrisian folks rejoice instead of men. Which ruins the poetry. I am considering goint to the NKYV, because my ESV and are literally falling apart. But I don't like the actual book I just bought. So I am not sure.

[@peacefulsoul77]

wow a Christian feminist... how can there be such a thing if you follow the world of God... makes no sense..

[@BMEULTRAMAGA24]

😂 good 1 😅

[@vipnetworker]

I agree with each of these points. For ease of reading, especially for those new to the faith, I like the NLT. There is a lot of excellent scholarship behind the translation as well as many excellent study Bibles and tools done in NLT. I am currently reading cover to cover in NKJV, also an NLT chronological study Bible, and using an ESV study Bible for extra reference. I also love using the YouVersion Bible app to easily switch between translations for extra clarity.

[@DesignInNature]

After many years of using modern translations, I recently fell in love with the authorized KJV. I can't seem to connect with my NASB as much anymore for my devotional study. The KJV just hits me differently at a deeper level. I still enjoy my NASB for comparison when diving deeper into certain passages. Mainly because my large study bible with commentary is the NASB. But again, the authorized version has just been a huge blessing to my life lately.

[@WordMadeFlesh777]

Yea I’m no KJV only, but yea….there is just something special about the KJV. Has a flow and is actually easier to read than the others when you get used to it.

[@smpittsburgh264]

I can relate! After many years in the modern versions, I came to read in the KJV. Comparisons among them lead me to leave the modern versions behind. Memorization and retention are easier, I find, in the KJV--surely a help with the 'belt of truth' and the 'sword of the Spirit.'

[@LittleLouieLagazza]

It's majestic. = D

[@glorifythyname7777]

It's because the KJV is inspired and preserved words.

[@Praise___YaH]

Guys, HERE is The Savior YaH The Heavenly FATHER HIMSELF was Who they Crucified/Pierced for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF” From the Ancient Egyptian Semitic: "Yad He Vav He" is what Moshe (Moses) wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3) Ancient Egyptian Semitic Direct Translation Yad - "Behold The Hand" He - "Behold the Breath" Vav - "Behold The NAIL"

[@lierox9]

CSB is legitimately great, we adopted it at our church plant in rough area. Makes great translation choices, and isn't afraid to drop well known phraseology to do good translation (see Psalm 23). Perfect for unchurched new Christians in my opinion.

[@strikeanywhere2981]

I agree. Give the CSB a fair shake.

[@larrylogan2485]

Strongly agree

[@MyPhilemon6site]

KJV vs ESV & CSB A simple test on how a translation treats the deity of Jesus Christ…. 1 Timothy 3:16 ESV- “Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness: He was manifested in the flesh, vindicated by the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.” KJV- “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. “ Notice the ESV and may I add CSB, NASB, NIV, New World Translation (JW’s Bible) Omitted “God” for “He”! “He” could be anyone , me, you, or anyone else! (Example: I was manifested in the flesh when I came into this world; I was vindicated in the spirit when I was born again; I am seen of angels then and now, etc) The King James Version specifically states that Jesus is God! Now the “Spirit of truth” would not testify otherwise!

[@PiperAlilahLandon]

I don't care for CSB. I guess we all have different choices.

[@jeremythomas1777]

Holman Christian Standard Bible is the choice for those who want a bold Bible.

[@SMElder-iy6fl]

I grew up in the Southern Presbyterian church which remained conservative. I grew up with the KJV and still think of memorized verses in the King James of my childhood.

[@michaelsburger665]

stay with the KJV

[@callieflanagan3310]

I feel like the nkjv and the esv are so balanced to use together. This confirms my thinking there. Thanks.😊

[@abba2me]

In 1980 I began my journey with the KJV, and used it for about 5 years. Then switched to the NKJV, which I very much enjoyed and used in the first years of Bible College. While in Bible college I adopted the 1977 NASB, and used it for many years until the ‘95 NASB came out. My preference was to use the most literal precise translation of the most evidenced manuscripts available. Although I have bought and referenced other translations, the NASB ‘95 remained my number one translation for about 23 years. When the Legacy Standard Bible became available in 2021, I was immediately smitten by the refinements and improvements to the NASB. The translators have done an amazing and thorough job in making revisions to the ‘95 NASB, while avoiding the more “politically correct” liberal leanings of the NASB 2020. As of today, the LSB is my preferred translation, although I often read from my old NASB ‘95 Bible with 20 years of notes. It’s like “home” to me. Maybe after my LSB editions get well worn and full of notes, I’ll feel at home with them. You are someone who will understand that sentimentality I’m sure. Anyway, thanks for the video, it was really interesting.

[@BrianJHilliard]

The reason I continue to read the KJV transition, is because I enjoy studying and exegeting God’s Word. Many modern English translations are easier to read, but it’s not necessarily better. I love to go beyond the surface of scripture and go into the deep waters. Studying Hebrew and Greek to help me understand the Word of God, keeps me in-tuned with the KJV.

[@jwatson181]

I read it in Latin because that is even better. Harder = better

[@jasonbryan3135]

Great video. The Geneva Bible (1599) is great! If reading it you'll notice the definite article "the" is replaced with "that" which is jarring at first but you get used to it. What I have found with the Geneva is that it reads more "modern" than the KJV, like if the ESV and KJV had a baby. Plus it has the Reformers study notes which is a great help. Matt, your videos actually helped me leave my Baptist background and become reformed. Thank you! There isn't a Presbyterian Church around me that isn't liberal but I found a Reformed Church that uses the three forms of unity with its roots in the Dutch Church and it's been a blessing.

[@ronlanter6906]

I belong to a reformed Baptist church. We are *Particular* Baptists!

[@ronlanter6906]

I used to be with a PCUSA (only because there where no PCA/OPC churches around but thank God Almighty that He brought me to a solidly Reformed Baptist (Particular Baptist) church. Praise God the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit!

[@eriq54321]

I noticed the "begotten Son" at john 1:14 was removed from the kjv that was originally posted in the 1599 geneva Bible

[@ronlanter6906]

@@eriq54321 Very interesting! Reminiscing of the *filioque controversy*

[@mkshffr4936]

1599 is my go to as well.

[@kahrenthriscutt3269]

I love KJV, but have just bought the Legacy Standard Bible, which I'm enjoying very much.

[@Sin_Brings_Death]

I've read the KJV, NRSV, and NLT cover to cover multiple times each. I respect the KJV and use it as a reference Bible. The NRSV is useful as a non-denominational ecumenical text when speaking with Christians from other denominations, but when I read the Bible for pleasure my favorite is the NLT.

[@Daegdon]

I like the NLT and the Jewish JPS old testament.

[@ronlewis9374]

Thank you for your videos. You are bringing Biblical Theology in a straight forward no nonsense way that is easy to understand. I can't quite call myself reformed but I find that reformed pastors, such as you are really speaking to my spirit. R. C. Sproul is one of my favorite authors / Teachers and I'm looking forward to getting your new book. Thank you again.

[@Yeoman1346]

I am a Missouri Synod Lutheran and I love reading the ESV. I have a lot of King James given to me by relatives. Nothing like psalm 23 or Luke chapter 2 in King James. I like the NASB as I have know a few seminary professors who used it until ESV came out. That’s my take.

[@WordAboveAll]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/d4LbgIZsqb2Zfpo

[@amazinggodchannel3513]

Amazing! God is so good! Thank you so much for great revelation about King James Version. I love it translation! I used it for a long time. I was 41 years in serving God. Keep up the good works! Our labour is not in vain. God bless you, your family and ministry. It's me, Rev. Ricardo Gayo from Philippines. #Godfirst01

[@faith_and_Jesus]

I always use KJV Bible and NIV study bible but I always use KJV first and foremost because it is the truest text thankyou for your time sharing this information with everyone 😊

[@annodomini7250]

truest text? and how do you come to that conclusion? Have you read the translator's introduction? Which translation of the KJV, the Oxford or Cambridge the 1769 or the original 1611 (find out by looking at the 'copyright' page)?

[@timnicely1579]

I’m right there with you, came out of a KJV only tradition, but now in my studies i rely on the KJV and ESV mainly for the reason you sited. When doing my daily devotional reading, I still love the flow and language of the KJV. Thanks for the great content of this video.

[@Praise___YaH]

HERE is The Savior YaH The Heavenly FATHER HIMSELF was Who they Crucified/Pierced for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF” From the Ancient Egyptian Semitic: "Yad He Vav He" is what Moshe (Moses) wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3) Ancient Egyptian Semitic Direct Translation Yad - "Behold The Hand" He - "Behold the Breath" Vav - "Behold The NAIL"

[@davidemme2344]

@@Praise___YaH So when Jesus was dying on the cross, who was he praying to when he prayed, "My God, My God, why have you forsaken me"? By the way, you gave no proof of anything. You asserted a translation that is not the same text the scriptures were given in. On the other hand, you havee not detailed where one could gind this, "Ancient Egyptian Semitic" Where do I find this and can it be read by a non speaker of the language you say it is in? I don't think I saw anything like that in all I have available to me and when it is 30,000 resources with Logos, why could I not find it in Logos? So you are what? A oneness Pentecostal of some soort?

[@Praise___YaH]

@@davidemme2344 - 2 Things 1. Revelation 22:16 jesus is the “offspring of David”, jesus, The “Bright Morning STAR”, IS LUCIFER, the “son STAR of Morning/Dawn” (Isaiah 14) 2. Moshe (Moses), was born in Egypt, raised by the Egyptian Pharaohs daughter and Egyptian Semitic was his language, NOT Hebrew. The Hebrew language did not exist until 300 years after Moshe’s death Isaiah 19:25 “Blessed be Egypt my people...”

[@Praise___YaH]

@@davidemme2344 Salvation is Simple sir HalleluYAH translates “Praise ye YaH” YaH is The Heavenly Father YaH arrives via the TENT OF MEETING YaH was Who they Crucified for our sins ** NO FEMALE INVOLVED WHATSOEVER ** - Hebrew Book of Isaiah Isaiah 42:8 "I am YaH; that is my Name! I will not yield my glory to another or my praise to idols. Isaiah 43:11 I, I am YAH, and there is no other Savior but Me. Isaiah 45:5 I am YaH, and there is none else.

[@MrThatWatchman]

All that bible worshipers can see and believe is “all scripture was given by inspiration of God”. They search the scriptures for in them they THINK they have eternal life but they never come to the Living Christ that they might actually have life (John 5:39-40). Bible worshipers are covenant breakers, because they reject the Holy Spirit (New Covenant)

[@edbrown5665]

I use kjv. My wife uses niv and we keep a nkjv in the house so we often cross-reference between the 3. I've found that this helps to get a closer understanding of the meaning as originally intended.

[@jeanenelatique]

That is great because you get to study together and understand more with all the versions. ❤

[@michaelsburger665]

Why in the world would these 2 bibles call Jesus as God's servant, this is wrong, ???? we as Christians know that Jesus is the Son of God, can anyone deny this fact, no, Jesus is God's Son, now they say NKJB precise translation, then why do the NKJB and the NIV state the following they are both corrupt NKJB Acts 3:13 The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the God of our fathers, glorified His Servant Jesus, whom you delivered up and denied in the presence of Pilate, when he was determined to let Him go. Acts 3:26 To you first, God, having raised up His Servant Jesus, sent Him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from your iniquities." NIV Acts 3:13 The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the God of our fathers, has glorified his servant Jesus. You handed him over to be killed, and you disowned him before Pilate, though he had decided to let him go. Acts 3:26 When God raised up his servant, he sent him first to you to bless you by turning each of you from your wicked ways.”

[@paulklenknyc]

KJV 5:48 • NKJV 9:52 • ESV 13:40 Great video, Matthew!

[@avondalemama470]

Two of my ancestors were King James translators. Lancelot Andrews and his brother, Roger, I believe it was. The KJV is my favorite, and I go from there.

[@jamesottaway3212]

If you have KJV translators in the family tree I would strongly encourage you to be definite about names and as much else as you can possibly find out. What a neat thing!!!

[@oceansams5886]

Awesome 👌

[@flowerlass]

My husband and I were in a small Bible study when we were in our 30s, and most of the other members were above 65. If anyone read a verse from a Bible other than the KJV, a woman in her 80s would say, "OK. Now I will read the verse from the real Bible." I will never forget how much I loved hearing her read from the KJV. I agree with you that it is much easier to memorize Scripture from the KJV. I use the ESV.

[@grantsmythe8625]

Yes, for many nostalgia plays a large part, if not the major part in their choice of versions.

[@louisaccardi2268]

Hogwash @@grantsmythe8625

[@michaelsburger665]

the ESV is corrupt please find Matthew 12:47 removed Matthew 23:14 removed Mark 6:11 removed last 23 words Mark 7:8 removed last 15 words Mark 7:16 removed there are many more I found the following bibles to be corrupt NIV, NKJV. NRS, NC, ESV, NAS, RS, LB, GNB, RV

[@MyPhilemon6site]

KJV vs ESV A simple test on how a translation treats the deity of Jesus Christ…. 1 Timothy 3:16 ESV- “Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness: He was manifested in the flesh, vindicated by the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.” KJV- “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. “ Notice the ESV and may I add NASB, NIV, New World Translation (JW’s Bible) Omitted “God” for “He”! “He” could be anyone , me, you, or anyone else! (Example: I was manifested in the flesh when I came into this world; I was vindicated in the spirit when I was born again; I am seen of angels then and now, etc) The King James Version specifically states that Jesus is God! Now the “Spirit of truth” would not testify otherwise!

[@keithmussey9635]

Respectfully, you may want to use another example to prove your point. The previous verses immediately before 3:16 clearly state that God indeed is the main subject matter (ESV): “14 I hope to come to you soon, but I am writing these things to you so that, 15 if I delay, you may know how one ought to behave in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, a pillar and buttress of the truth.” Remember, context matters. What is written verses, even chapters before or after a verse helps define God’s Word. 😊

[@wycheholt1902]

I have always read the KJV ( I’m 22) and will always.

[@TouchTheUniverse]

Why?

[@bw2442]

The beauty of the KJs is, it is keyed to the strongs concordance, otherwise I enjoy the different translations to bring out depth and width of meaning in the word. The KJ is not perfect as many proclaim. It has some weak and outright wrong translations in very important areas, Calling the body of Christ “the Church” instead of the called out ones has focused generations on a building instead of people. And the translations about hell and everlasting punishment are wrong when compared to original texts.

[@tallswede80]

@@TouchTheUniverse it was used during the expansion period of christianity. the fruit of the modern translations, has been the decline of christianity and the west, and the rise of the extreme perversions that we see today.

[@tallswede80]

@@bw2442 You don't have and have never read the "original texts".

[@lyndam6640]

KJV ONLY

[@MH-nh2yz]

I’m just learning about the different translations, but one thing I noticed was that the NASB, NKJV, and KJV all translate in Genesis 35:18 regarding Rachel’s death that her soul was departing because she was dying: “Now it came to pass, as her soul was in departing, (for she died) that she called his name Ben-oni…” I love that the verse describes for us here that our soul departs from our body when we die. It’s a comfort! I was disappointed to read the NIV and ESV left out the soul departing, and I assumed then that they must not be as accurate in translation as the others. I wasn’t going to get a new NIV or ESV because of that. What do you think, Pastor, about the difference in translation there?

[@michaelarmstrong7300]

I grew up kjv, preached from it for years. Still has a huge place in my heart, as well as nkjv. But most recently I'm preaching from nasb. In my personal devotions I'm reading from the lsb. Good call on your top three.....

[@Praise___YaH]

HERE is The Savior YaH The Heavenly FATHER HIMSELF was Who they Crucified/Pierced for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF” From the Ancient Egyptian Semitic: "Yad He Vav He" is what Moshe (Moses) wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3) Ancient Egyptian Semitic Direct Translation Yad - "Behold The Hand" He - "Behold the Breath" Vav - "Behold The NAIL"

[@rmviv4rmviv443]

You all should also check out the analytical literal translations (alt3) of the bible by gary f zeolla its a bible set so and has concordance and companion and (why these books are in the bible) books so to me it's more trustworthy when an author can back up what he did also you can add and take away books that you think is canonical and have a place in the bible or not. Also check out the third testament spirit of truth I hope to hear more people conversate and debat it but as far as can tell it's scriptural and the knowledge of it has been proven based of my experience the only thing is that I can't find much research about it so I'm hoping to see videos of research. Plus based on my research god seems to be calling an Era every 2000 years and has been releasing a book around every Era. In around 2000bc he released the old testament around 400ad he released 2nd testament and about 1900 he released the third testament spirit of truth. I know things are done in cycles to. And I know people miss out on understanding and seeing his miracles because they aren't truly following him that's what happens to the people who knew about Jesus but weren't truly following the made the mistake of crucifying him..

[@heyjace7213]

We use kjv at church. I really enjoy John McArthur’s Legacy Standard Bible for personal reading at home. I too was surprised by the message. I learned so much reading thru it. It’s almost like an explanation of the bible. Very helpful read.

[@MrThatWatchman]

*Come out of Babylon's churches (confusion), and put away your bible Idols (Bible = Babel = Confusion)* All that bible worshipers can see and believe is “all scripture was given by inspiration of God”. They search the scriptures for in them they THINK they have eternal life but they never come to the Living Christ that they might actually have life (John 5:39-40). Bible worshipers are covenant breakers, because they reject the Holy Spirit (New Covenant)

[@donnachap7249]

KJV NKJV and the legacy are the best The rest are getting to liberal in their theology! ESV has some issues as well by Changing some meanings to words!! Have a blessed day all!

[@respectingthewordpodcast]

​@@MrThatWatchman what are you talking about???

[@nathansmith8241]

Interesting philosophy! I personally love the CSB, but could easily use the ESV and do use the NKJV in my church where I’m a youth pastor. My only pet peeve is that I end up spending a considerable amount of my teaching time just explaining terms that reach over my teens & pre-teens. But all in all we have a plethora of good translations that make God’s word accessible!

[@MrNanonen]

Teaching the meaning of words seems very much needed nowadays, since many people don’t even know what a woman is.

[@scottbrandon6244]

I find that too. I had a tough time explaining to youth what a covenant was. They just did not get it. Teens also seem to have a problem with much of the Old Testament and taking those stories and applying them to their own life.

[@Noah-rv9uj]

@@MrNanonen unfortunately :(

[@MrThatWatchman]

The GOSPEL is NOT written with ink, nor on tablets of stone, but on our hearts by the Spirit of the Living God. Under the New Covenant we are to be led by the Holy Spirit, not the bible.

[@MrThatWatchman]

All that bible worshipers can see and believe is “all scripture was given by inspiration of God”. They search the scriptures for in them they THINK they have eternal life but they never come to the Living Christ that they might actually have life (John 5:39-40). Bible worshipers are covenant breakers, because they reject the Holy Spirit (New Covenant)

[@ugenegareth9339]

I answered and said, "If I have found favor in thy sight, O Lord, show this also to thy servant: whether after death, as soon as every one of us yields up his soul, we shall be kept in rest until those times come when thou wilt renew the creation, or whether we shall be tormented at once?" 76 He answered me and said, "I will show you that also, but do not be associated with those who have shown scorn, nor number yourself among those who are tormented. 77 For you have a treasure of works laid up with the Most High; but it will not be shown to you until the last times. 78 Now, concerning death, the teaching is: When the decisive decree has gone forth from the Most High that a man shall die, as the spirit leaves the body to return again to him who gave it, first of all it adores the glory of the Most High. 79 And if it is one of those who have shown scorn and have not kept the way of the Most High, and who have despised his law, and who have hated those who fear the Most High -- 80 such spirits shall not enter into habitations, but shall immediately wander about in torments, ever grieving and sad, in seven ways. 81 The first way, because they have scorned the law of the Most High. 82 The second way, because they cannot now make a good repentance that they may live. 83 The third way, they shall see the reward laid up for those who have trusted the covenants of the Most High. 84 The fourth way, they shall consider the torment laid up for themselves in the last days. 85 The fifth way, they shall see how the habitations of the others are guarded by angels in profound quiet. 86 The sixth way, they shall see how some of them will pass over into torments. 87 The seventh way, which is worse than all the ways that have been mentioned, because they shall utterly waste away in confusion and be consumed with shame, and shall wither with fear at seeing the glory of the Most High before whom they sinned while they were alive, and before whom they are to be judged in the last times. 88 "Now this is the order of those who have kept the ways of the Most High, when they shall be separated from their mortal body. 89 During the time that they lived in it, they laboriously served the Most High, and withstood danger every hour, that they might keep the law of the Lawgiver perfectly. 90 Therefore this is the teaching concerning them: 91 First of all, they shall see with great joy the glory of him who receives them, for they shall have rest in seven orders. 92 The first order, because they have striven with great effort to overcome the evil thought which was formed with them, that it might not lead them astray from life into death. 93 The second order, because they see the perplexity in which the souls of the unrighteous wander, and the punishment that awaits them. 94 The third order, they see the witness which he who formed them bears concerning them, that while they were alive they kept the law which was given them in trust. 95 The fourth order, they understand the rest which they now enjoy, being gathered into their chambers and guarded by angels in profound quiet, and the glory which awaits them in the last days. 96 The fifth order, they rejoice that they have now escaped what is corruptible, and shall inherit what is to come; and besides they see the straits and toil from which they have been delivered, and the spacious liberty which they are to receive and enjoy in immortality. 97 The sixth order, when it is shown to them how their face is to shine like the sun, and how they are to be made like the light of the stars, being incorruptible from then on. 98 The seventh order, which is greater than all that have been mentioned, because they shall rejoice with boldness, and shall be confident without confusion, and shall be glad without fear, for they hasten to behold the face of him whom they served in life and from whom they are to receive their reward when glorified. 99 This is the order of the souls of the righteous, as henceforth is announced; and the aforesaid are the ways of torment which those who would not give heed shall suffer hereafter." 100 I answered and said, "Will time therefore be given to the souls, after they have been separated from the bodies, to see what you have described to me?" 101 He said to me, "They shall have freedom for seven days, so that during these seven days they may see the things of which you have been told, and afterwards they shall be gathered in their habitations." 102 I answered and said, "If I have found favor in thy sight, show further to me, thy servant, whether on the day of judgment the righteous will be able to intercede for the unrighteous or to entreat the Most High for them, 103 fathers for sons or sons for parents, brothers for brothers, relatives for their kinsmen, or friends for those who are most dear." 104 He answered me and said, "Since you have found favor in my sight, I will show you this also. The day of judgment is decisive and displays to all the seal of truth. Just as now a father does not send his son, or a son his father, or a master his servant, or a friend his dearest friend, to be ill or sleep or eat or be healed in his stead, 105 so no one shall ever pray for another on that day, neither shall any one lay a burden on another; for then every one shall bear his own righteousness and unrighteousness." 2 Esdras 7:75 /////////////////////

[@richiejourney1840]

Interesting…

[@echos9396]

The NIV is my preferred version to read as its the easiest for me to understand.

[@michaelsburger665]

Why in the world would these 2 bibles call Jesus as God's servant, this is wrong, ???? we as Christians know that Jesus is the Son of God, can anyone deny this fact, no, Jesus is God's Son, now they say NKJB precise translation, then why do the NKJB and the NIV state the following they are both corrupt NKJB Acts 3:13 The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the God of our fathers, glorified His Servant Jesus, whom you delivered up and denied in the presence of Pilate, when he was determined to let Him go. Acts 3:26 To you first, God, having raised up His Servant Jesus, sent Him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from your iniquities." NIV Acts 3:13 The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the God of our fathers, has glorified his servant Jesus. You handed him over to be killed, and you disowned him before Pilate, though he had decided to let him go. Acts 3:26 When God raised up his servant, he sent him first to you to bless you by turning each of you from your wicked ways.” the ESV is corrupt please find Matthew 12:47 removed Matthew 23:14 removed Mark 6:11 removed last 23 words Mark 7:8 removed last 15 words Mark 7:16 removed there are many more I found the following bibles to be corrupt NIV, NKJV. NRS, NC, ESV, NAS, RS, LB, GNB, RV

[@amberbarnes1183]

Grew up with KJV. Using a NLT funny thing, during my study the other day got out my KJV to flip back and forth thru verses and remembered how much I loved reading the KJ translation!!

[@galatians22122]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/bYm4n2OMlKdrqbs

[@HappyPenguin75034]

Nobody studies NLT. It’s to read and never study.

[@steverees1936]

I did some research into Bible translations before I bought one and those three Bibles came out on top in every test and recommendations. My wife kindly bought me an ESV Study Bible and I love it. It's full of historical information and maps etc. I'm so glad you also chose it as one of three choices.

[@rmviv4rmviv443]

You all should also check out the analytical literal translations (alt3) of the bible by gary f zeolla its a bible set so and has concordance and companion and (why these books are in the bible) books so to me it's more trustworthy when an author can back up what he did also you can add and take away books that you think is canonical and have a place in the bible or not. Also check out the third testament spirit of truth I hope to hear more people conversate and debat it but as far as can tell it's scriptural and the knowledge of it has been proven based of my experience the only thing is that I can't find much research about it so I'm hoping to see videos of research. Plus based on my research god seems to be calling an Era every 2000 years and has been releasing a book around every Era. In around 2000bc he released the old testament around 400ad he released 2nd testament and about 1900 he released the third testament spirit of truth. I know things are done in cycles to. And I know people miss out on understanding and seeing his miracles because they aren't truly following him that's what happens to the people who knew about Jesus but weren't truly following the made the mistake of crucifying him.

[@Mr_m888]

*Proverbs 30:5-6 **_Authorized KJV_* 5 Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him. 6 Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar. *Psalm 119:160 **_Authorized KJV_* 160 Thy word is true from the beginning: and every one of thy righteous judgments endureth for ever. *Psalm 119:89 **_Authorized KJV_* 89 For ever, O LORD, thy word is settled in heaven.

[@jonathanskeet5076]

The very first things I really learned to read were bible verses in the meeting hall (Brethren) where my parents took me, from my birth onwards. I remember starting to read my dad's King James bible during the services, and looking at the pictures. One of the headings over the text was "Jesus heals divers sicknesses" "Divers" was the old rendering of "diverse" I found the pictures that this conjured up in my mind very moving, of Jesus standing over some poor guy, huddled on the floor on a harbour wall somewhere, struggling for breath after nearly drowning in a diving accident....

[@kalulu1675]

@jonathanskeet5076 LOL That's what I thought, too! One thing the KJV does is build your awareness of vocabulary changes.

[@jonathanskeet5076]

@@kalulu1675 To say nothing of the healing of the "impotent" (i.e paralysed) man!

[@johnenglish4652]

Thanks, great video. My favorite Bibles are KJV, NKJV, NASB, LSB and NLT. But my everyday reading is NKJV this year because as I read through the Bible I like to have a bit of Study help so I'm using the NKJV Life Application Bible and as time allows also the LSB and NLT. I think I've bitten off to much. I hadn't considered the Message, although I've got nothing against it. I grew up in Presbyterian churches before the present craziness so the KJV has been a favorite. I'm presently in an Independent Baptist church. Last year I went through The KJV Study Bible that had reformation notes. It is a good one too (The Reformation Heritage Study Bible, KJV).

[@adamfischer333]

I was raised in the church and my early years were KJV only. That was the version that I had memory verses of in sunday school and children's church. It is the version that the leaders of my church preached out of. KJV was the only version I knew until sometime in the 1990s. When my parents saw that I wanted to start reading the Bible, they got me a Living Bible translation. The Living Bible made everything easy to understand for me and made the Bible come alive in a way that it hadn't before. In the late 90s, after I had been reading the Living Bible for a few years, I got my first study Bible and it was NIV. I stayed almost exclusively with the NIV for the next 20 years. I now consult different versions when preparing lessons and sermons. I find that when you consult different versions you can get a better picture of the contents of the verse. Personally, I think my progression from the more reader friendly version of Living (New Living or Message might be good alternatives as well) to the NIV (an in-between translation in my opion as far as readablity) and now consulting a variety of versions and commentaries to deepen my knowlege made me fall in love and understand the Bible. The understanding that I had as a foundation was able to be built on with other verions that are more word-for-word.

[@willsmith475]

Some new revised bibles are known to rewrite passages to where the passage is not interrupted properly or there are missing verses

[@gus1537]

I was raised on KJV, but 30 yrs ago switched to NKJV. I fought the change till one day the Holy Spirit, spoke to me in the Inward Voice. They all work, if my people will use them, believe them and get to know me, personally, read one that you understand and the way I speak to you. since then I was free from religious tradition that makes the word of God of no effect.🔥🔥

[@patrickblue3813]

You do realise that there is certain words in the NKJV (as well as other "New" versions of other translations) that has been changed from what they originally was in the KJV Some may seem small and insignificant changes BUT they can and do have a huge impact on the Truth Just one small example is found in Revelation 13:16-17, I suggest you read both the KJV and the NKJV for that passage and see for yourself Are you really sure it was the Holy Spirit ? did you test the "inward voice" to see if they was who they said they was ? (if no, then why not ?)

[@ezequiasquezada5238]

Your arguments seem flawed as you advocate for the exclusivity of the English version, disregarding the diverse perspectives and wisdom of English speakers over the past 1600 years. Embracing both the KJV and delving into the Greek reveals a richer understanding. The NKJV, catering to contemporary speakers, stands as a commendable translation for our times. The beauty of Greek lies in its nuanced expressions, offering a spectrum of translations beyond the confines of the KJV. Each word holds a tapestry of meanings, allowing for diverse and insightful interpretations.

[@terry5914]

@@ezequiasquezada5238 Anti-freeze has a beautiful taste to it, but it will kill you if you drink it. Error is not something anyone should spend their time with if they are sincere. The Ancient Greeks could not even get Christ's proper name right.

[@Jonathan_Gen15.6]

By these standards… shouldn’t we all learn Hebrew/Aramaic & Greek to get the “truest” translation of God’s word? Isaiah 55:11

[@Bob-gn8ph]

​@@Jonathan_Gen15.6spend some time over at TRUTH IS CHRIST ❤

[@jimmiespeach]

So glad to hear that you approve of the KJV! I have always believed it to be the very best translation! And I agree that it is so much easier to memorize because of the unusual language. I just recently found you on the Internet, and I am very happy that I did. You're very clear, concise and easy to understand. No gimmicks, or sleezy music being played in the background. Thanks, and keep up the good work.!

[@almillard2946]

Love your choices. I started with the NKJV some 20 years ago, most of my memorized verses are in that translation. I do better with the NASB than the ESV, just personal preference, and I’m probably in the minority in that regard. Just recently started using the KJV a little and am gaining an appreciation for its beauty and elegance. Having started with the NKJV has given me a leg up in understanding the archaic words and phrases as I’m reading it. Thanks for sharing your expertise!

[@charlesf2804]

Then I'm in the minority too. I use the NASB, KJV and NKJV for hard study. If I buy/read anything else, it's for the format of the features, not the translation. Example: I have The Apologetics Study Bible (HCSB); I bought it for the apologetics content.

[@Revelation18-4]

The NKJV is a corrupted bible. Some of the covers on the NKJV have the satanic triquetra on it. 🤔

[@TheOpendoormedia]

I also use the NSAB as primary and ESV as secondary as well as New King James. The problem with the King James for me, is the language for some of the 1800 Elizabethan translation that you have before you is the meaning of the words have changed in the last 150 some odd years since the translation of the King James. It sounds fancier because it's using words we don't use anymore, but I just don't want to be confused with words that have changed the meaning and modern times versus then was throws off what the verse is that I'm reading. I have no issues with those who can do so, God did not design my brain to be one of those.

[@Revelation18-4]

@@TheOpendoormedia The meaning of the words has not changed. The Jesuits and the Vatican versions corrupted the words to deceive people. A sin still means sin, a dog, still means dog, etc. The King James bible is written on a 5th grade reading level. Why is it that people can understand Shakespeare's writings, but can't read the King James bible and understand it? It's not rocket science.

[@berhanegebriel3155]

In addition to your PCA, I also recommend you go to Ethiopia and Eritrea a week or two before Christmas and Easter to Lalibela, Ax(ks)um in Ethiopia and The Monastery of Debre Bizen in 4:49 Eritrea.Both of them are on KZbin also. Just a personal suggestion . I am satisfied with The NIV and NKJV STUDY Bibles.

[@huskerite2]

The NASB reference edition is where I am at home. That came with studying Greek. For example, Eph. 4:22 "lusts of deceit" is exact and is only found in the NASB. In addition, if they ever substitute a word that is for readability, but not literal, they tell you that in the reference column. They also do not leave out any verses found in the KJV, that may have been added for clarification. They too are found in the reference column. Alternate translation possibilities are also there. Perhaps you didn't look closely enough. But I appreciate you and your ministry. God's peace.

[@jlotoo850]

YES! I so agree! I love the NASB as well--the older 1977 edition, not the more modern ones which have changed critical things. I love how it keeps the more intimate language of Thee and Thou in place when addressing God in prayer. There is nothing more intimate than prayer--expecially in John 17 when it is a conversation within the Godhead. To change it so that Jesus is saying 'you' to the Father in prayer is like Jesus putting the Father at arms length. Stick with the 1977 NASB, thank you. The newer ESV and NKJV just change things too much as compared to the NASB 1977 edition. They have been trying to change things ever since that Masterpiece was done. (Satan was not happy with that version so he went into overtime coming up with all the new versions to confuse people after that--even 'modernizing' the NASB 1977 version in 1995 and 2000....)

[@trainleader21]

Same here. NASB is the literally translation of the Bible, then I also use ESV.

[@jlotoo850]

@@trainleader21 Nope--my pastor reads from ESV while I follow along in NASB 1977 version----to many 'little' changes that actually affect the meaning of the verses. There was nothing wrong with the NASB 1977 version. They changed it because it was too threatening to have people able to understand the real gospel reading it. Notice our last BIG revival/spiritual awakening was when that Bible came out---people got saved left and right. Immediately after that the enemy suddenly went into overdrive to bring out 'new versions'--NIV etc etc. The more new versions that come out, the darker our nation has become. Go back to the NASB 1977 version and watch revival HAPPEN!

[@christinekemper7347]

​@@jlotoo850yes. The 77 version of NASB is a good one 😊

[@teknion00]

Thanks so much for this video. Being 74, I was raised on the King James translation of course, but my favorite is the New King James translation. I think I have a copy of every translations there is, including the English Standard and 1977 edition of the New American Standard. And my son and his family gave me a new Geneva Bible for Christmas. Love it.

[@TheBrownsberg]

reprobate.

[@jlotoo850]

I love the NASB as well--the older 1977 edition, not the more modern ones which have changed critical things. I love how it keeps the more intimate language of Thee and Thou in place when addressing God in prayer. There is nothing more intimate than prayer--expecially in John 17 when it is a conversation within the Godhead. To change it so that Jesus is saying 'you' to the Father in prayer is like Jesus putting the Father at arms length. Stick with the 1977 NASB, thank you. The newer ESV and NKJV just change things too much as compared to the NASB 1977 edition. They have been trying to change things ever since that Masterpiece was done. (Satan was not happy with that version so he went into overtime coming up with all the new versions to confuse people after that--even 'modernizing' the NASB 1977 version in 1995 and 2000....)

[@jeananne75]

These are the 3 I use!! KJV is my favorite for basically all the reasons you mentioned! I do find it easier to memorize for sure!

[@jeffreynichols803]

That was very informative thank you. I’ve personally had scripture quickened to me from no less than 5 versions. First was at the point of my salvation from the KJV, second was from an amplified, third (and a numerous more times) was from a NKJV, fourth was from an NIV, fifth was from the message paraphrase study tool (I don’t regard it as a bible, but I do sometimes use it to see how Eugene interpreted the text). I was taken by surprise when the Lord confirmed a word He audibly spoke to me through the message. I was on my knees, surrounded by my usual study tools, the Strongs concordance, and about three different bibles. The Lord said to me “read this from the message bible”, so I arose, pulled it out of the cupboard and read the exact words He’d spoken to me two days earlier. I was very surprised as I don’t regard the message as a bible, but the Lord confirmed a word for me through it. It was Ephesians 3:20. I find the NLT problematic, and have endeavoured to delete the passion from my bible study app for years, but it just keeps popping up in my library, and I go and delete it again. So again, many thanks, my faves are the NKJV, ESV and CSB. I won’t touch my NIV any more.

[@michaelis37]

Great video! I am a new believer and was given a NKJV study Bible. I really like it, but have a hard time understanding some of the terms and sentence structures. The ESV really helped me. But then I had people telling me the NASB is better. I feel great reading the two I have. But being someone who really wants to study the word and understand it to its fullest, it’s refreshing to know that someone who studies as much as you do prefers the same. God Bless you and everyone who reads this comment!

[@4givenembracd618]

Welcome to the family of God❣️ I was saved during the “Jesus Revolution” so I’m an old lady, but I still get so excited to meet a new believer! May our Father continue blessing you with the realization of His passionate love for you and with a growing, deep, intimate relationship with Jesus, and may His Spirit continue filling you with increasing hunger for His word! That (His word) is what will sustain you in whatever trials you might go through and it will give you all the wisdom and discernment you’ll need to navigate these days when even the existence of Truth is being challenged. God bless you, dear brother! ❤

[@frustratedmajority851]

The KJV is God's perfect and preserved words, I promise you. All the other versions are corrupt catholic knockoffs to put it kindly. Pray about it sincerely and ask God to show you if I'm lying. We are in the greatest apostasy today since the dark ages

[@hestia598]

i have nrsv catholic and protestant and niv. i suggest you should read these books

[@SolasChristusMinistry]

As far as languages go, I find Hebrew so much easier. It’s so phonetical as long as you learn the usual consonant combinations. But this may also be due to me being a huge lover of Jewish culture and history especially the fact that our faith, scriptures and messiah came through them as God’s trusted “messengers” in a way. My childhood sweetheart was Jewish and now IS my wife so that may also have to do with it. Lol

[@nosretep1960]

LoL, never been a fan of gutteral languages. I suppose as the way I learned Greek and the phoneme structures, just so much more lyrical. Of course I learned Greek before Hebrew.

[@faithwalker7]

I use the 3 Bible translations you mentioned. KJV, NKJV & THE ESV. I used these 3 for years. Great teaching on the translations. Just ran across your channel today.

[@timothy4557]

Darby and Rotherham is great.

[@MyPhilemon6site]

KJV vs ESV A simple test on how a translation treats the deity of Jesus Christ…. 1 Timothy 3:16 ESV- “Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness: He was manifested in the flesh, vindicated by the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.” KJV- “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. “ Notice the ESV and may I add NASB, NIV, New World Translation (JW’s Bible) Omitted “God” for “He”! “He” could be anyone , me, you, or anyone else! (Example: I was manifested in the flesh when I came into this world; I was vindicated in the spirit when I was born again; I am seen of angels then and now, etc) The King James Version specifically states that Jesus is God! Now the “Spirit of truth” would not testify otherwise!

[@amandamsnyder87]

Im reformed baptist, and I started with KJV and I have grown in ESV. I like the ESV reads as I get older.

[@4givenembracd618]

I started out as a young teen, freshly saved, reading the NLT, a paraphrase, which was so non-intimidating, it helped me fall in love with God’s word. After I matured a little, after 4 or 5 years of steady reading and going to Bible studies, church, and listening to radio Bible teachers, I heard that the NLT was a paraphrase, and I wanted a “real” Bible because all I had at the time was a New Testament. So I saved up and got myself a genuine leather KJV. I was so excited and literally wore out that Bible. It started falling apart, and it ended up with all but a few white spots between all my highlighting and underlining. Most of what I have memorized is from that translation. A few years later, I went through a devastating, life-changing experience and a consequential deep depression and for some reason in the midst of it all, I wanted a Bible with a happier cover (😂) and since my KJV was dying, I decided to get myself a new one. I’d been hearing about the accuracy of the NASB so I got one of those with a pretty reddish cover and still have it. But my very favorite has become the Amplified Bible. What’s your opinion about that?

[@annbutler9658]

I absolutely LOVE the Amplified Bible. I also have KJV

[@kolsonmaddox777]

I’ve been reading NKJV and KJV over the past few months but over the past couple week’s mainly KJV. It has become my favorite for sure and I’m just used to the old English when reading the Bible

[@kevinbrown348]

I'm the same way. When you get comfortable with the KJV it's hard to go back to other translations.

[@LittleLouieLagazza]

It's poetic. = )

[@EdThePastor]

I like to compare different versions. My go-to Bible is ESV. I like the NCV because it is written at a 3rd-grade reading level and also not a bad translation. NKJV works well for me as a final to round out.

[@MyPhilemon6site]

KJV vs ESV A simple test on how a translation treats the deity of Jesus Christ…. 1 Timothy 3:16 ESV- “Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness: He was manifested in the flesh, vindicated by the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.” KJV- “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. “ Notice the ESV and may I add NASB, NIV, New World Translation (JW’s Bible) Omitted “God” for “He”! “He” could be anyone , me, you, or anyone else! (Example: I was manifested in the flesh when I came into this world; I was vindicated in the spirit when I was born again; I am seen of angels then and now, etc) The King James Version specifically states that Jesus is God! Now the “Spirit of truth” would not testify otherwise!

[@NickatLateNite]

As a Calvary Chapel bible teacher, we use the NKJV to teach from. When we were introducting the bible to brand new readers, we use NLT booklets to get them started.

[@teamrecon2685]

Love old school Calvary Chapel!

[@NickatLateNite]

@@teamrecon2685 Amen, brother... Nothing but glorious memories in the Lord🙏

[@TrueLight1611]

I’m loyal to the King James Version. As you said, it does help memorization. Really love the KJV and am so thankful to God for it.

[@michaelsburger665]

Amen you are spot on, the KJV is the only bible to read translations was taken from the Textus Receptus, and not from the Greek , many new bibles was translated from both translations and even from other translations

[@lymphomasurvive]

The only reliable translation is the Douay Rheims.

[@Me2Lancer]

Thanks for sharing these great translation recommendations. I grew up on the KJV and the NKJV and ESV are included in my daily bible readings. I think your choices are spot on.

[@rmviv4rmviv443]

You all should also check out the analytical literal translations (alt3) of the bible by gary f zeolla its a bible set so and has concordance and companion and (why these books are in the bible) books so to me it's more trustworthy when an author can back up what he did also you can add and take away books that you think is canonical and have a place in the bible or not. Also check out the third testament spirit of truth I hope to hear more people conversate and debat it but as far as can tell it's scriptural and the knowledge of it has been proven based of my experience the only thing is that I can't find much research about it so I'm hoping to see videos of research. Plus based on my research god seems to be calling an Era every 2000 years and has been releasing a book around every Era. In around 2000bc he released the old testament around 400ad he released 2nd testament and about 1900 he released the third testament spirit of truth. I know things are done in cycles to. And I know people miss out on understanding and seeing his miracles because they aren't truly following him that's what happens to the people who knew about Jesus but weren't truly following the made the mistake of crucifying him.

[@peggyspurlock3012]

I love NLT to me, I can hear Jesus talking to me so easily in it.

[@johnnytrejo911]

I like this version for new believer’s when they come to Christ. During the years when I was getting involved in the Harvest Crusades . We would share with New believers and give them the New Testament bibles with Pastor Greg Laurie’s footnotes in the NLT New Believers New Testament bibles 👍🏼

[@SeamusDelion]

Trash. That's a thought for thought translation. Pure trash.

[@PsykoHoneyWeed]

2 Corinthians 2:17 KJV "CORRUPT the WORD of GOD" no other translations or versions can pass that TEST

[@peggyspurlock3012]

@@PsykoHoneyWeed so when did you learn to read ancient Greek texts and Hebrew. How are you going to get your camel 🐪 through the eye of that needle 🪡.

[@lymphomasurvive]

@@PsykoHoneyWeedThe KJV is a corruption of the Word. It’s dedicated to an English king.

[@donnastorey3830]

i attend a Baptist church our pastor studied Greek and Hebrew when he was. in seminary He preaches out of KJV , he also will read another interperations to show the difference in the text. he will also tells the greek or hebrew words and what the word means. i use NKJV, but i do have others Bibles that i study with.

[@Jonsmama1]

My number one is the King James Version. It has a reference and beauty about it which deserving of God’s Word. Some of the newer translations feel watered down and not as reverent. Everyone should read it and if need be have a more modern English version along side just to help you to understand some of the harder passages. It’s also my go to version for memorization.

[@rmviv4rmviv443]

You all should also check out the analytical literal translations (alt3) of the bible by gary f zeolla its a bible set so and has concordance and companion and (why these books are in the bible) books so to me it's more trustworthy when an author can back up what he did also you can add and take away books that you think is canonical and have a place in the bible or not. Also check out the third testament spirit of truth I hope to hear more people conversate and debat it but as far as can tell it's scriptural and the knowledge of it has been proven based of my experience the only thing is that I can't find much research about it so I'm hoping to see videos of research. Plus based on my research god seems to be calling an Era every 2000 years and has been releasing a book around every Era. In around 2000bc he released the old testament around 400ad he released 2nd testament and about 1900 he released the third testament spirit of truth. I know things are done in cycles to. And I know people miss out on understanding and seeing his miracles because they aren't truly following him that's what happens to the people who knew about Jesus but weren't truly following the made the mistake of crucifying him.

[@jimproud3116]

Thank you Matt for your comments on these translations. I became a believer in early 1958 and at that time everyone in my circle of friends used the KJV and looked askance at using the Revised Standard Version. The first Bible I bought for myself was KJV in the Scofield Study Edition. So I learned early to accept the dispensations! I was involved with the Navigators and learned to memorize many many verses. That has stood me in good stead all these years. I and my friends were eagerly awaiting the whole Bible in the NASB but it was different than all the verses I had memorized in the KJV and so some of my memorized verses began to slip away not getting reviewed as much. So I settled on the NKJV and have not regretted it. Also I use the Phillips New Testament when I want to get another view on some passages. I love it.

[@Gl0ckb1te]

I love acts 8 20, in philips version. Ephesians 2:10 the voice bible has the most beautiful way

[@AllforOne_OneforAll1689]

I recommend using the CSB, LSB (or NASB1995), and NKJV for reading and studying. Those should cover all the basis. Add the NLT if you struggle with reading or are just starting out.

[@respectingthewordpodcast]

Love the LSB

[@mac5110]

NASB 1995, NKJ and ESV

[@respectingthewordpodcast]

@@mac5110 Those are all english translation duh but why? Why not just one of them??

[@mac5110]

@@respectingthewordpodcast because it is the translation, there is no perfect translation. if you know one or more foreign language(s) then you know what I'm talking about. NASB (1995)is the word to word, relatively it is the most accurate, but accurate doesn't mean beautiful.

[@mac5110]

@Thomas B then learns the basic biblical Hebrew and Greek and studies their cultures. Even the best translation can not translate "the culture".

[@Nanster-gv8nf]

I was blessed in that my Grandparents were old school which rubbed off on my parents, so we always used the KJV exclusively Until I went off to the military. Now I use 4 or 5 translations but I have no issue at all using the KJV.

[@NeoSpiritx]

NKJV was my go-to when I first started reading the Bible seriously for myself and also for the next several years after that. Even though it's no longer my regular go-to I'll always have love for it as that's where it all began for me. ESV then became my go-to almost a decade ago now. I've also added the NASB95 and CSB into the mix more recently too with the former being used for deep bible study along with my ESV and the latter more for just regular bible reading, yet the ESV still remains my go-to as the main translation I read.

[@nbenefiel]

I read the Bible in Latin and Greek. My favorite translation is the Anchor Bible. Two lines of text and 2 pages of footnotes. When you work your way through it, you feel you have really learned something. We have very few OT texts in Hebrew. I studied Latin,Greek, Coptic, Old Norse, Old Irish, Old Church Slavonic, French, German and Italian, but not ancient Hebrew or cuneiform. At one time, I was pretty fluent in all of them. Now, nearly 60 years later, I can barely read any of it. Three kids, 3 bouts of cancer and 3 rounds of radiation kind of did me in, but it was sure fun while it lasted.

[@ellen823ful]

Awesome 😎

[@SS-rl9bg]

God bless you. I'm learning Hebrew, and I love it. I don't think I have the determination to learn Latin, too. But if I did, that would be my next language.

[@maralfniqle5092]

Amazing, what a gift. I do prefer the fairly original Greek myself, wish I could read Hebrew though. I find that all the translations in English lose a lot of the finer meaning, nuances and outright different in some places.

[@robinsonmitchell9995]

In talks about Bible translation I often hear the phrase "Precise, word-for-word translation," including by you at 15:25 in this video. I'm an RTS grad and took Greek but not Hebrew. But I've done extensive professional translation in other languages. Languages each have their own syntax, style, and word order, and those differences often mean the best and most precise translation may not be word for word, because it's just as important to take into account the target language as the source language. I use the ESV, but like you I grew up with the NIV 1984, and as a professional translator I understand and appreciate the "dynamic equivalence" principle. Applying ipsissima verba too rigidly, especially toward word and phrase order, can result in a stilted and even distorted rendition that can lose the meaning of the source. The committees who have done all the translations you mentioned were not amateurs, and I am sure they took this into account, though here I'm not including those who have prioritizeed contemporary cultural considerations over accuracy and precision of the text.

[@RohannvanRensburg]

Well said. There's definitely a tricky and blurry line here, because trying to keep up *too much* with evolving English can also result in a blunder. I think a good example is the NASB updating "brothers" to "brothers and sisters" (with "and sisters being italicized) to indicate how the Greek word is actually used, even though it technically translates as "brothers".

[@OriginalStraight]

You try to explain this to a KJV only user, they'll head will explode. They'll ramble on about how this certain text was preserved by God's supernatural powers. 😂

[@rightinthedome9973]

KJV is really an abomination when it comes to translation. It's explicitly bias and it's not hidden very well

[@electroraptor71]

I started reading the KJV when I was 16 and I love it. The most accurate English bible translation out there.

[@petey80]

I love the KJV and NKJV. I'm a big NASB and LSB fan too. I find that the CSB is good for kicked back reading or even outreach, as it speaks a great language (with a literal course) for unchurched unreached souls to hear the gospel. It's the perfect dynamic translation for a purpose like that. I learned about it in the Frisch Perspective.

[@kdbrown777]

I used the NASB through college and really liked how it referenced words for studying the Hebrew and Greek.

[@djpodesta]

Excellent perspective on the subject. I, like you, learnt scripture, early on, through the NIV (84) and supplemented my readings with the KJV, but never bought into ‘the debate,’ because I gleaned the same understanding of scripture through both translations… and even when young (a child), I thoroughly enjoyed reading anything from contemporary language fiction to general language non-fiction in most categories; to the point where I could remember and explain vast tracts of content, but could never remember/recite anything poetical… except for limericks… so the NIV (84) continued to be my base. Like you, also; I cannot rightly accept any NIV presented after this version of the scriptures. Now I have my trusty; well worn, NIV (84), KJV - (Including two heirloom copies), NKJV, NASB, ESV, LSB… and NRSV (out of curiosity and to understand what liberal/ecumenical Christians use to draw their conclusions from) - I find it extremely important to understand other’s beliefs (across the religious and political spectrum) so that I know why they believe the way that they do and engage with them at their level if necessary. If I could only choose three versions of the Bible for my own indulgence and personal edification … it would be tough to let go of the KJV and NASB… But for all round clarity… 1. Keep my NIV (84) 2. NKJV (for the TR link to the KJV and helpful footnotes) 3. ESV (for the reasons that you outlined) and helpful footnotes. They would perfectly compliment each other as a small library to turn to, while solidifying my own personal beliefs. Strangely though, if I had to choose one ‘bare bones’ text to study, without any cross references or helps, I would have to choose the NASB - But that may be because I already have a broad understanding of the Bible through the dynamics set out in my NIV. But; as I am treating this exercise as a hypothetical, I will hide the KJV and NASB up my sleeve to compare texts when nobody else is watching. Enjoying your presentations Pastor Matt.

[@MyPhilemon6site]

KJV vs ESV A simple test on how a translation treats the deity of Jesus Christ…. 1 Timothy 3:16 ESV- “Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness: He was manifested in the flesh, vindicated by the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.” KJV- “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. “ Notice the ESV and may I add NASB, NIV, New World Translation (JW’s Bible) Omitted “God” for “He”! “He” could be anyone , me, you, or anyone else! (Example: I was manifested in the flesh when I came into this world; I was vindicated in the spirit when I was born again; I am seen of angels then and now, etc) The King James Version specifically states that Jesus is God! Now the “Spirit of truth” would not testify otherwise!

[@djpodesta]

@@MyPhilemon6site And what do they all s reveal in John Chapter 1? I thought that it was the Holy Spirit who speaks the truth of the Gospel directly into our hearts as we read God’s Word. If somebody reads the Holy Scriptures out of context, then maybe they are being lead by somebody other than God.

[@danielclooney6248]

Thanks so much for this video. I was raised on the KJV then later the NKJV. Then a SS teacher said he liked the ESV, I had to get one. But never could warm up to it, guess too many years in NKJV. Then I met a missionary living in Greece and speaks Greek. He said the NASB was his go to over any of the others. Got one of those and again, couldn't warm up to it so I'm back in my trusty NKJV.

[@jamesaritchie1]

I think God was stopping yo0u from warming up to the ESV. You'll find the devil in it more often than you find God.

[@danielclooney6248]

@@ron_grimes Good. I know a missionary in Greece and he told me the same thing.

[@danielclooney6248]

@@jamesaritchie1 Example please.

[@lwmaynard5180]

Greens King James Bible with the Interlinear of the Old and New Testament ? and NEB. of the 1970s ASV are excellent older translations ?

[@Coraxiom]

NKJV hands down is the best English Bible. Nothing comes close to it overall in terms of intact literalness, legibility, and literary quality.

[@stefanhenning40]

It retains the excellent prose of the KJV while being fully intelligible. Plus it uses the TR which is a pro- for me.

[@truthorpropaganda9001]

Disagree. It is translated in the same way as new age bible versions. It is not connected with the KJV at all

[@stefanhenning40]

​@@truthorpropaganda9001 So the KJV is the only reliable Bible translation right? In what way are modern translations New Age? New Age is a very specific movement...

[@truthorpropaganda9001]

@@stefanhenning40 pieces of new age are not specific though. And specifically there are whole books on this matter, I certainly cannot wrap all that material up in this little comment section. This is the information age, all material is there for you to find. But pieces of New Age, like name and claim it which is a direct new age teaching of positive manifestation, for example.

[@CharlesCollins]

Thanks, brother. Very helpful. I was brought up on the KJV, moved to the NKJV and now use the ESV. One you didn't mention is the NLT which may not be your cup of tea, but I find it refreshing especially if I am reading a large section of the Scripture. The NLT Study Bible is also very helpful, the full version and not the concise version.

[@georgevalco215]

Yes. Agree…I use the NLT mostly as a supplement instead of the NIV. Such a shame that they messed with the original NIV from the 80s which was the best of the dynamic equivalent translations.

[@thetattooedguy1413]

Yes I agree the NLT is probably my absolute favorite. I have struggled with it using it though ( like if it was ok or not ) I know many say KJV only etc - and I thought that for a while but I found the NLT and love it. I just would let pastors or KZbin pastors lead me away from the NLT or make me feel bad for using it.

[@CharlesCollins]

@@thetattooedguy1413 I think it is good to have two or three different versions at hand so you can compare them. The NTL is good for easy reading and the NTLStudy Bible has some excellent notes. But it may not be so good for more in depth study. Just my opinion.

[@yeshuaislord3058]

i personal use the ESV And KJV each night. but i also have messianic translations i enjoy as well like the TLV. i am incredibly grateful to have different translations to read side by side. it helps me to understand what's being said better when i read them together.

[@MrThatWatchman]

2 Corinthians 3:6 He has made us competent to be ministers of a new covenant, not of the letter, but of the Spirit. For the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life.

[@rmviv4rmviv443]

You all should also check out the analytical literal translations (alt3) of the bible by gary f zeolla its a bible set so and has concordance and companion and (why these books are in the bible) books so to me it's more trustworthy when an author can back up what he did also you can add and take away books that you think is canonical and have a place in the bible or not. Also check out the third testament spirit of truth I hope to hear more people conversate and debat it but as far as can tell it's scriptural and the knowledge of it has been proven based of my experience the only thing is that I can't find much research about it so I'm hoping to see videos of research. Plus based on my research god seems to be calling an Era every 2000 years and has been releasing a book around every Era. In around 2000bc he released the old testament around 400ad he released 2nd testament and about 1900 he released the third testament spirit of truth. I know things are done in cycles to. And I know people miss out on understanding and seeing his miracles because they aren't truly following him that's what happens to the people who knew about Jesus but weren't truly following the made the mistake of crucifying him.

[@FlyTour69]

I like the NJV. TLV is pretty neat too

[@joshuaboone7115]

​@@MrThatWatchman what is the meaning of this verse?

[@MyPhilemon6site]

KJV vs ESV A simple test on how a translation treats the deity of Jesus Christ…. 1 Timothy 3:16 ESV- “Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness: He was manifested in the flesh, vindicated by the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.” KJV- “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. “ Notice the ESV and may I add NASB, NIV, New World Translation (JW’s Bible) Omitted “God” for “He”! “He” could be anyone , me, you, or anyone else! (Example: I was manifested in the flesh when I came into this world; I was vindicated in the spirit when I was born again; I am seen of angels then and now, etc) The King James Version specifically states that Jesus is God! Now the “Spirit of truth” would not testify otherwise!

[@michaelwittkopp3379]

Well, I grew up on Billy Graham. But, I myself was/am Calvary Chapel. I think you made some good picks, and a lot of sense. My KJV was printed in 1948. Lost my NKJV & ESV somewhere in all my years of travel. _(KJV lost its cover back in the 60s.)_ Picked up a NIV a few months ago, but haven't been able to get into it. It's too different. And, I also have to admit that I like using the internet versions of translations a lot. _(Eyes aren't what they use to be.)_ And I will also admit that the internet has been a blessing for me. Not only for scriptural text, but also locating different Biblical studies. _(There's so much available to us nowadays... and I am a Biblical Archeology nerd. So, I'm having a heyday.)_

[@martinhawrylkiewicz2025]

I am glad I came upon your vid. I was at a Barnes&Noble the other day on my lunch break, browsing through a religion section when I have noticed so many different choices when it comes to picking the right bible to study. I found it very confusing to pick the right one for me who is not very familiar with the study or daily reading of the bible but would like to start.

[@Dwayne_Green]

Awesome! I have been doing all my personal devotions and reading from the KJV and I've been preaching from the NKJV. I haven't really settled on a critical editions that I 'regularly' go to, but I often reference the CSB, BSB, and the NET notes.

[@Praise___YaH]

HERE is The Savior YaH The Heavenly FATHER HIMSELF was Who they Crucified/Pierced for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF” From the Ancient Egyptian Semitic: "Yad He Vav He" is what Moshe (Moses) wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3) Ancient Egyptian Semitic Direct Translation Yad - "Behold The Hand" He - "Behold the Breath" Vav - "Behold The NAIL"

[@caleblewis9662]

The KJV has been my main translation for a number of years. I love it! You just can't beat its powerful and majestic language. Plus, it's a great word-for-word translation. To plagiarize another KZbinr, the KJV is probably the greatest English translation of all time. Also, I have recently been using the BSB (Berean Standard Bible). It reads kinda like the 1984 NIV, but its a bit more literal. It's English is very smooth and easy to read, while often maintaining traditional-sounding wording. I could say several more good things about the BSB. It is fast becoming my second favorite translation.

[@Aaron-hype]

I’ve heard from the Lord so much in the KJV and love it, BUT, to claim it’s the most literal is false and one, just one, in depth word study with a concordance proves this. The Amplified original (classic) explains what the meaning behind what the KJV describes in single words. I.e. “love.” What kind of love? Agape? Romantic? Brotherly? “ Peter, do you ‘love’ me?” That word the KJV and NKJV as “love,” isn’t the same in all three occurrences, as they would portrait. The Greek proves this. The third time, He uses “phileō,” whereas the first two, “agape.” Both King James will NEVER open your eyes to this.

[@jwatson181]

The KJV... disgusting... I use the Geneva Bible. Why go for an update? If it was good enough for the Pilgrims, it is good enough for me.

[@michaelsburger665]

Why in the world would these 2 bibles call Jesus as God's servant, this is wrong, so you do not know about this???? we as Christians know that Jesus is the Son of God, can anyone deny this fact, no, Jesus is God's Son, now you call out the NKJB precise translation, sorry you are wrong then why do the NKJB and the NIV state the following they are both corrupt NKJB Acts 3:13 The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the God of our fathers, glorified His Servant Jesus, whom you delivered up and denied in the presence of Pilate, when he was determined to let Him go. Acts 3:26 To you first, God, having raised up His Servant Jesus, sent Him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from your iniquities." NIV Acts 3:13 The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the God of our fathers, has glorified his servant Jesus. You handed him over to be killed, and you disowned him before Pilate, though he had decided to let him go. Acts 3:26 When God raised up his servant, he sent him first to you to bless you by turning each of you from your wicked ways.”

[@KeithKatterheinrich]

Asbury grad here. I started using ESV in seminary because my Hebrew skills were lacking and the ESV tracked so well with the Hebrew text. I first began using it for it's benefit in exegetical papers and now study it daily because I love it.

[@mac5110]

NASB is the best, but ESV works too.

[@perfectstandardkjv6849]

@@mac5110 You're both hereticks and false converts who don't even have the words of God.

[@mac5110]

@@perfectstandardkjv6849 accusation is one of the works of Satan. Don't be his slave.

[@prof_xhew2929]

Translating from other languages into English is tricky (even so from old language) so each translation got strengths n weaknesses Using ESV for reading is 👍 but I find ESV for indepth studies is ok so far (unlike kjv there are many many books that show kjv weaknesses and strengths) Ps: nkjv - not good bcoz it doesn't even follow TR manuscripts n omits many verses n words

[@MyPhilemon6site]

KJV vs ESV A simple test on how a translation treats the deity of Jesus Christ…. 1 Timothy 3:16 ESV- “Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness: He was manifested in the flesh, vindicated by the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.” KJV- “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. “ Notice the ESV and may I add NASB, NIV, New World Translation (JW’s Bible) Omitted “God” for “He”! “He” could be anyone , me, you, or anyone else! (Example: I was manifested in the flesh when I came into this world; I was vindicated in the spirit when I was born again; I am seen of angels then and now, etc) The King James Version specifically states that Jesus is God! Now the “Spirit of truth” would not testify otherwise!