GOGGLES CHANGED FOREVER!! NEW Skyzone 03O is INSANE!!!

[@UAVfutures]

Giveaway rules in description, What would you get and why the skyzone 03Os for $429 bit.ly/Skyzone03O or a Fatshark HDO setup and rapid fire for $650? I guarantee "they" will be reading thing and taking what we say to develop new goggles.

[@flyinghub3140]

I Am yet to attach - get a action Cam on my quad, haven't got any recording ability with my current goggs either, so my channel is empty.. Is this an issue regarding the giveaway?

[@hub7093]

Just bought the fatshark HDO staying with the leader not a wanna be of you have the money great bid tho

[@hub7093]

What I wanna know is would you buy em?? Or did you?

[@dronereviewman9580]

Fat Shark all day!!!!!! Hope you have a good week Stew!!!!!! I love this hobby and this hobby has me in love with KZbin!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Great Channel Stew!

[@JonE5FPV]

No module? It’s really killing them. Imo that means the value is closer to an Aomway v1 with a slight premium for screens. I still put them onto level 3 on my goggle guide.

[@junglistfpv8553]

Tony is right imo. If they make a modular receiver bay (with or without the actual Skyzones modules included) and maybe switchable 4:3 / 16:9 resolution and remove the camera to cut costs this would be instant buy for me.

[@LazerLord10]

I bought those mirror things from a few vids ago. They had a good price and they really look nice. Plus, as I fly alone, I don't need to be worried about being trapped in a box.

[@WhiteDean45]

What mirror things? I tried to find the video you were referring to.

[@mathewatkinson5723]

I am currently using the Skyzone Sky02X’s and love them. I started with box goggles then the original Aomway Commanders and really like the 16:9 format. I would like to see an OLED goggle with a native 16:9 screen. Keep up the good work Stu i always enjoy your vids.

[@SlipperyFPV]

Orqa may fill your 16:9 needs, if they ever come to market.

[@joriscoolen3700]

I am soooooo happy I bought these, was a little worried they wouldn't fit or would have other problems but thank u for this video and giving me the reassurance that I did the right thing!

[@UAVfutures]

which version did you get?

[@pteranodon3946]

Like: good screens, 4:3, channel in OSD, fast switching, head tracker. Don't like: No 19650 battery case included. I don't think the missing option to change receiver modules is that big of a deal. The built-in module seems to be on par with a True-D and there is digital FPV on the horizon which the 03O has an HDMI input for.

[@SuperSigma69]

Yup exactly my thoughts!

[@IanMaddox]

Love my 02X pair. Glad to see they're raising the bar. They really need to have a better naming scheme though. o3o, o30, or 030? It's a product searching nightmare.

[@Vanwolfmusic]

I suppose you already know but is 03 oled. 03o

[@boardboyd]

I would chose the Skyzone's over the HDOs as the dvr is better, built in receiver, faceplate options, battery cable and ability to do 6s voltage

[@domly5548]

How good is the front mounted camera? Front mounted camera is a great idea for hand launching fpv plane, which I have a few.

[@Gienbfu]

Its great seeing fatshark finally have some competition, not just with this, but also with stuff like the dji system.

[@UAVfutures]

how do you think that dji will impact us all in the long run? its a little scary IMO

[@Gienbfu]

UAVfutures the main problem I think could come up, at least in places like the US would be with DJI lobbying to make their system the only one people can legally use

[@jonsaavedra175]

I would probably get it because of high resolution, as well as not having to pickup a module to use it right out of the box.And i do like how they made it bling out a bit more compared to others, rather than just a common generic look

[@UAVfutures]

anything you dont like?

[@jonsaavedra175]

@@UAVfutures i guess my only con it, would be what you said about not being able to put in rapid fire but i don't really intend to race at the current moment.

[@angelisfpv]

Sky Zone are killing it! I just bought the o2c by sky zone. Can’t fault them. Love ur vids Stew, keep them going. I was wondering in the future if you could try film the screens?

[@UAVfutures]

using a go pro or something?

[@angelisfpv]

I assume so, or even your phone. If you watch Joshua Bardwell he seems to use one of those options. Love your vids Stew, would love to join you one day.

[@V1ZFN]

Nice but no module bay... thats a dealbreaker for me and I'd pick the Hdo's over the sky zones...some really nice features and updates over the older googles though.

[@philipmcgregor8740]

Looks like a brillant top end goggle. I like the oled and higher res screens compared to hdo. Face plates are nice. I don't mind no module bay, but I would like 16 by 9 format. Also put some decent antennas in the box and a 8650 battery pack.

[@CARLOSBEATBOX]

i started fpv drone freestyle for 3months now. Iam using eachine boxgoggles for to get used to the new hobby. Right now everybody hustle to get the HDO or Dji Goggles. I would like to get this great goggles, i believe they will do a super job. I Like and enjoy your videos most of time keep up the good work, cheers from a beatboxer

[@jodyking7278]

I have yet to make a purchase of an fpv goggle and I definitely appreciate this video for helping feed into whatever I end up getting. At the moment I'm learning LOS. As others have touched on, I think the lack of a module was a mistake. There is always going to be that wonder if it could have been better with a module. If the module capability was there, the decision would be a no-brainer.

[@SwFTTTT]

skyzone are killing it right now, I bought the 02c's after your review, can't fault them they're amazing! oled would be a sweet upgrade though ;p

[@camperlain]

It's great to see more competition in the top tier of goggles we get to see better innovation and hopefully drive the price down a bit. I would love to have these if they are that clear and clean and cheaper than HDOs. and I would agree that I don't mind not having modules as long as the built-in receivers are good as a beginner upgrading to better goggles keeping it simple is better.

[@DavidReynolds-kr6yh]

Jacob chamberlain , I’ve got the older skyzone v02+ goggles and when I lost a quad more than a half a mile away over a hills and down the other side and down a ditch behind thick scrub, and I still got just enough of a picture to be able to find them, my mate with fat shark goggles and a rapid fire module couldn’t see anything.

[@stuntstein]

Happy to see you are back on full speed, Stu. I got into the quad fun about 6 months ago and bought everything second hand, including my Aomway V1 goggles. I had trouble finding goggles that fit my narrow face. Can way to try the Skyzone's. Time for an update :-) Cheers.

[@EddieandSophieViney]

I'm new to FPV, have been stalking the reviews on goggles to upgrade my cheap box goggles... with no brand loyalty I'd say the skyzones seem to be a better buy... like I said, I don't know much, but I am a buyer... thanks for the info Stu... keep em coming.

[@UAVfutures]

did you see my recent comparison vid between aomway skyzone and FS?

[@Jokis1231]

For me OLED was the only thing lacking when comparing to fatshark. Now there's OLED and better res! Also, I like the options to adapt the googles to the face and the options you have for the battery placement + awesome band. Controls look super convenient. Cannot add rapid fire but I'm no pro so I could live without it. Would prefer this over any other googles!

[@FPVtips]

It's awesome to see some innovation in the goggle area and I'm personally stoked about what Skyzone is doing! Big up!

[@UAVfutures]

its pretty exciting stuff. What goggles did you start with?

[@IanF-FPV]

Can't says it's innovation. They just sourced the OLED and installed in existing design.

[@LOVE-of8iw]

Finally. A faceplate that will fit my fat American Big Mac shovel for a face.

[@deant6627]

ROFL

[@UAVfutures]

I'm sure its lovely haha, do any other fit?

[@LOVE-of8iw]

@@UAVfutures Yes, it's just refreshing to hear someone say "This will fit your fat face.". The U.S. is so Politically Correct we don't get to hear that often publicly. This made me smile, thanks!

[@cenabitednbfpv587]

And my super skinny one lol

[@user-im7gd5do9h]

Lol

[@mikescott2242]

These goggles look amazing. I’m new to the hobby and have only tried the Aomway V1s. I really like how they have thought about the basics and improved the low cost features, but they have pulled all the strings to improve the good stuff too. I would definitely go with these over HDOs. Great to see lower cost options for us who are just getting started on a tight budget.

[@Vaterraman]

I think I'd go for HDO simply because I can toss in the Rapidfire module. I'd have to truly be able to test the Skyzones to know if they are worth it. In other words, it would have to perform pretty close to the HDO with rapidfire, or at least make up for the lack in rx quality for screen quality.

[@miguelc7738]

Boy! The shot of your video feed looks excellent! The nice thing about these is the ‘extras’ that are included; wide strap, extra face plates, I love the Knight Rider LED’s also. Pimped out right out of the box. The lack of a module bay may be a drawback but your reception looked great.

[@chris-jones]

Just waiting on a mate to take delivery of his before ordering mine. Ran Sky02s for last couple of years and didn’t find the 03s to be a significant improvement enough for me to justify upgrading. I’m hoping these will be. Would be nice to see the option of with and without a module bay but I’ve never had a problem with Skyzone receivers and every time I’ve tried a set of fatsharks I have been very underwhelmed by them. Skyzone for me every time.

[@nomad8426]

Skyzone all the way. Have had Sky02 and the revised 03"s and love them. From my 02s to 03s never had a problem with the built in reciever. Oled would be a great addition. Great review Stu

[@UAVfutures]

which ones do you use most?

[@nomad8426]

@@UAVfutures the 03" s now I'm used to the big fov and my partner, she uses my o2"s

[@CyclinFilm]

Great review. As someone just getting into the hobby I don’t think I would be investing this much for my first set of goggles, but they definitely look nice. I think I would still pick these over the HDOs though because I’m not so interested investing in additional modules at this point, and that sounds like just too much to spend so early on. I think in the end I will go for one step down and get a pair of sky zone sky02x/c since they have all the features I need and should last me a number of years. There is also so much change happening in the goggle field right now that it doesn’t make much sense to me to go for the most expensive goggle when there will be something bigger and better right around the corner. Thanks again for doing these detailed reviews, very entertaining and informative.

[@EDerable1]

Nice to see this, after some 10 years fliying LOS, this could be my first goggles. I just started upgrading myself to me V2.0 and tried out fpv with a hdo and it's amazing to fly like that. Thanks for this helpful video👍😎👍

[@JonSmith-fc2mm]

Sounds good as it. I've not heard anyone speak ill of the built in receivers on Skyzone so the lack of module bay is not an issue. Outstanding work by Skyzone! I'd definitely go with the Skyzones over the Fatshark just to give support to a company that listens to what users want.

[@fpvdave]

OK Stu, eleven months later, what's your go to Goggles. I have Aomway V1's, looking to pass these onto my grandson and am considering my next set of goggles. What should I go for? I like flying 2.5" and 3" drones but but started out on the 5" and crashed a few of those. So is now the time to go digital, is it worth the additional cost especially as I like to fly the smaller quads. All ears.

[@whileistillcan9338]

I love my Skyzone V02 goggles even though they didn't fit my narrow face until I modified it. I like the user interface and don't care about the changeable module as mine works great as is. Will the new faceplate fit the V02 goggles? I'll buy the Skyzone before Fatshark!

[@deant6627]

Looks like an awesome goggle, the face plate insert is an absolutely fantastic idea, there would be nothing more annoying then forking out big bucks on a pair of goggles and having light leakage. I would definitely choose skyzones over fatsharks because of not needing to buy or change modules. looking forward to to the day i can upgrade from my old Eachine piece of junk.👍

[@jdc8352]

Maybe he'll give you these when he reads this

[@deant6627]

@@jdc8352 do you think he might 🤪

[@UAVfutures]

I dont think he will lol

[@jdc8352]

Lololol nooooope 😁

[@ChrisJohnsoniShootnRaw]

I love Skyzones. Been rockin the 02’s for like 3 years now. No problems. I’m one of those ones that doesn’t like worrying about a module. I see all these comments awww no module no module no module... lol. I fly in the same places as guys with the rapidfire and whatever other module out there and I get just as good reception. I’m never like oh I can fly over there or in there because I don’t have a module. But anyway Ill be upgrading to these. Only downside for me is no 16:9. But I will to give a shot! Nice review

[@CrixyTnT]

Awesome review i got a question whats the difference between the SKY030 and the SKY03S ?

[@Sergeant898]

SKY03S don't have the OLED displays. Apart from that, they are essentially the same.

[@CrixyTnT]

@@Sergeant898 thank you for the speedy reply and info

[@donphobos]

I like both the Fathark Attitude and this new Skyzone one. Looks like a great set of features and good screens. As a newbie to the hobby I practice with a 7" DVR screen, but my aim is to improve and then get some affordable goggles with good features.

[@scottdavey9905]

I loved this video reviewing the skyzone goggles. I am new to the fpv scene and bought some eachine ev100's as a starter pair but would love to purchase a pair of the skyzone 030 after that review. I find it amazing how prices can vary so much, is there actually a huge difference in internal software that warrants such a massive price hike. Love the channel keep up the good work.

[@wezcandish5603]

Hey Stu, did you guys get a look at the sky03s as well? They're ~$100 less but looks like a big drop in resolution. I can't decide which way to go but you're the guys with all the 1st hand info. Thanks bud.

[@rc-fannl7364]

I would choose the HDO over this because the modular receivers add so much flexibility, and I understand Fatshark customer service is really good. However, these Skyzone goggles seem to offer a great FPV experience for a nice price, which makes the choice really hard.

[@pensilpusher]

I have a pair of the original Skyzones and they have served me well. I am now in the market to upgrade and these look really tempting. The one thing that I would like to see is a comparison between these and any goggle with the rapid fire module as the video range/reception is the main selling point for the module based fatsharks. Thanks

[@rokonfpv3040]

Been rocking my HD2 for a long time, been through about 4 modules and I adore the massive screens but there are so many things that are just a mission - least of which, only being able to use 2s packs. its amazing to be able to use a 4s pack to power you goggles! The huge resolution is a no brainer with some type of HD feed on the way. The HDO are just mad expensive and I've flown a demo set and can't say I was blown away. Just seem too much money for the price!

[@solvend]

I really like the adjustable lumens on this model. Just wish you would have shared what the FOV is in degrees and how physically large the screens inside are.

[@scottmarshall6766]

Original Commanders, HDOs w/rapidfire, and a Clearview Ground station in the house, I just bought the DJI Hi-Def, so my kits full for a while.- I'm not loaded, but I've been doing this for a long time (KK days) and have been upgrading every year or 2. I'm thinking the DJI just may be my go-to for a while, and HDOs for the old quads. Glad to see some real competition for the old garde though, Good news for the hobby.

[@IanBeaty]

This would be a tough decision if I was looking for new goggles and I did not already own HD2 T2 goggles with Rapidfire. The lower price is a huge plus and I will definitely be recommending these to friends. I am a huge fan of the multiple faceplate design. I love how well everything is integrated and just works. The goofy RGB lights are great; I am way into RGB stuff, and you can turn them off if you don't want them. The front camera would be a helpful feature to me. I do really wish they had a module bay, even if it came empty and there was still a built-in receiver that you could turn on and off. I would really like the ability to use modules directly in the goggles because I would never plug in something externally from an AV cable; too much of a hassle. That would also make a digital receiver module directly in the goggles possible in the future. So, the one thing I would change is leave an empty module bay there in the side. If it had that, this would probably be the ultimate goggle out there right now. Otherwise, I would not necessarily change anything else except maybe a little more FOV because I have a 50 degree right now and I love it, but that is just a personal preference.

[@fpvflyriding]

Good stuff. I like 16:9 better too. I think the price difference is significant & I'm happy with the 02C's, so I would certainly go Skyzone on this. I personally don't need ultimate penetration, etc. I wonder if the spare face plates fit the O2C's & if they can be purchased separately.

[@DavidReynolds-kr6yh]

I knew it, skyzone is an awesome company, and this just blew away fat shark. They’ve been making great products for a while now, and they’re willing to put in the effort that others aren’t. I can see skyzone becoming the top manufacturer of goggles. I wish I could afford these, but for now I’m happy with my skyzone v02+ goggles, love the range as well. Lost a quad over a hill and down the other side and probably close to a half a mile away, maybe more and could still just see enough to be able to work out where it was. My friend with his fat sharks and that module that everyone raves about couldn’t see anything. So yeah they might be good, but still didn’t get the same distance.

[@UAVfutures]

awesome you got it back?

[@DavidReynolds-kr6yh]

UAVfutures , yeah I did, my friend climbed down through a lot of bushes and scratched himself up a bit while getting to it, but it was still in perfect condition. It was my turbobee 4s , which is brilliant by the way. I then smashed into a light pole at a local sports ground, bought a new frame and it’s going again.

[@LuceSacra]

Just getting started with fpv and building my first quad. Was looking at entry level goggles like the EV100s but would love the upgrade to the OLED screens!

[@thebikeracer]

Let me know what you decide. I'm in the same boat. Playing on the Sim right now and have a quad in the mail. I'll probably start line of sight until I figure out what to do.

[@jochendhondt866]

i can see a practical side to that RGB in the front too to identify which quad is which pilot if you sync led color on your quad with your goggles

[@daslolo]

best screen but the VRX is just okay when compared to a rapidfire (i fly between trees). and think of upcoming HD modules (drool?) maybe skyzone will wise up and open a receiver bay in their next generation. until then i’d go HDO.

[@pteranodon3946]

Upcoming digital modules will require power, HDMI and a place to put it on the goggles and I reckon that is what every goggle manufacturer will be planning right now. So I'll just relax and use my HD3s until that generation will hit the market.

[@thafactor24]

I agree bro

[@zhongningli4544]

Honestly RapidFire is not the king of VRX anymore. TBS's receiver is cheaper and better, and skyzone's built-in VRX are actually really awesome. I get barely any flashes when flying in the woods with 25mw RUSH VTX.

[@daslolo]

@@zhongningli4544 you have a Fusion?!

[@zhongningli4544]

@@daslolo Nah, I wish I have one. But I was able to try the 03o and compare it with the HDO. HDO's screen really burns out after about a year. The image looks yellowish.

[@MilitantPeaceist]

I like how you’re able change the faceplate to suit the face. I have a bigger than avg head that will help cut down light leakage. I don’t have a problem with the lack of module b/c being used to the EV100, I just AV in with my pro58 on Achillies. What I am really looking for is a design like the way the EV100 changes focus for us that wear glasses. I know it’s a very cheap goggle but this feature stands out to me. I really like the front camera.

[@DrDisintegrator]

For me having alternative faceplates for better fit is a huge game changer. I've been flying Fatshark HD3's for several years, but I thought the HDO were too expensive for me to upgrade so soon. Now, these googles are a great deal vs. Fatshark.

[@ArchmageAU]

Looks like a real contender against the HDO's. Was looking to upgrade goggles as I currently use Aomway v1's for racing. These could fit the budget where as HDO's with Rapidfire is more of a stretch. Can switch to 4:3 from 16:9 for racing as often on an angle when flying fast round a track.

[@wannab009]

i would get them because of the price range, but like others have commented the lack of module is what is holding them back from being the best goggle, i think if it came as a full kit with module at this price would be great, or cheaper without and you can get the rapidfire if that would be your preference.

[@jeremypushong5451]

With digital around the corner, a module bay is definitely on list of must haves. With digital, 2k & 4K will be around the next corner so 16:9 is a preference. With that said goggles that I can use comfortably all day is priceless! There will always be a new tech in the works, but comfort and fit is primary. HDO vs 03O = Skyzone 03O’s for the win! Now if they only offered a modular system for screens for a future upgrade...

[@David-ct5hj]

I just got into FPV and got the simple eachine e800d's, which is great for beginners. Now I see everyone commenting about the missing module for the skyzone 030, which is a bummer... but nonetheless think that fatshark should up there game innovation-wise. Really tend to maybe buy skyzone's in the future, since the price is just more forgiving then the fatsharks although it is a one-time investment. Great video Stew! Thanks for all these reviews and explanations on fpv flying (really handy for people like me that are just getting into this hobby).

[@thegrafxguy1]

i've got HDO goggles and love them with the RapidFire module. i think having the module choices and being able to better 'future proof' your goggles is the way to go. if a crazy HD module comes out for my Fat Sharks i don't have to buy a whole new goggle for another $450, i can just get a new module for $100 or whatever instead.

[@michaelmatthews6421]

I had a crappy set of box goggles...Walkera, upgraded to the Skyzone 02s. Love them, but I would definitely buy the 03 over the Fatshark HDOs

[@lrfpv5292]

These goggles seem so COOL! They have OLED screens, a higher resolution than the FS goggles, and have a much better user interface. It's a no brainer over which one I shall get!!!

[@one1drboy9472]

Skyzone or fat shark? I wpuld chose witch one is in my budget because I still have the eachen 007, but fr if I had to choose it would be the the skyzone for how cheap and simple

[@billyzou8123]

Which Long Range Quad would you recommend? The Skol V2 or the Eachine Tyro 129

[@mustacheman6000]

Goggles look pretty good. Oled is becoming more accessible and its great for those looking to get some crispy FPV action. Would you consider making an updated $99 build? or maybe an update $200 beginner setup?

[@Darksagan]

As a noob I think I would prefer a larger screen for more immersion. These have everything that people previously complained about including Bardwell to fatshark.

[@umutkaradag2340]

Cant wait to try this awesome goggles! Skyzone climb up the goggle leader ladders! Oled dvr diversity usb And "front camera". What can you want another feature from the fpv goggle?

[@thirtythreeeyes8624]

My one complaint about fatshark is no camera on the front. They keep laughing at me when I call and ask if they plan on adding one and I don't know why.

[@UAVfutures]

some people want a module bay? what do you think?

[@umutkaradag2340]

@@UAVfutures i think they made a great job on internal diversity module. No need the external modules.

[@umutkaradag2340]

And if they want they can mod it i think :D Even ev100d can be modded and used with fatshark modules.

[@neilo8b]

so good seeing the latest goggles reviewed for quads,i like the skyzone "cylon" effect too, cheers stu

[@JayWolters]

yes -- Not Klingon

[@josephbove7477]

I prefer this over the Fatshark HDO's. I like not having to add parts such as the receiver. The Skyzone 030 is only one notch away from true perfection. If you could switch between 4:3 and 16:9 it would be game over for the Fatshark!

[@matthewallen3375]

I love my Skyzone SV02+ and use the Headtracker and 3d in my planes... Having amazing screens, built in fan, color, led strip, wide strap, same menus etc. is exciting. The value for price is no comparison when you add the FS HDO + diversity unit + Headtracker cost. Skyzone's a no-brainer for me $430 vs ~$700. As I get my boys involved, I will need a third pair past the Box goggle. Thanks Stu for the great content!

[@Leafyfpv]

The faceplate fitments are great. Interesting there is still the front facing camera. I dig the lightbar they added, and the adjustable lumens seems a great idea if seperate from a brightness control which seems to wash out the image easily. With preparing for hd systems I am suprised they have the built in receivers.. im sure they work well enough but hooking in through the hdmi would seem to make things a bit awkward.( extra cable tether, cable possibly to come loose or pop out if accidently tugged)

[@PBoogerwood]

GREAT review. I'm looking to get out of my box goggles and was looking at the Sky02C for $260 US but was willing to upgrade to the Sky03O but it really doesn't sound like it's worth the extra $140. But that better screen is REALLY tempting as my almost 50 y/o eyes would probably prefer it.

[@muriaticfpv2328]

I have the 02's and love them. I find I can jump around channels much faster then the other guys with FS's. My only gripe with mine, and probably the 030's as well, is there is no auto-start dvr. One extra step at the beginning of every flight which I usually forget to do making it much harder to find my lost quad.

[@timbermen11]

Thank you for the review. I’m brand new to the sport so this definitely helps “us” out. I just bought a transmitter the other day from a video you posted. Once I have enough saved up for a pair of goggles I might buy these..... or the cheaper pair you reviewed a little while back🤑. Keep up the great videos

[@saluki919]

I want to see how the fat shark and the skyzone compare to the DJI fpv goggles. Is that the new gold standard?

[@Miichi005]

These look great. I've only been into the hobby about a year now after seeing your $99 build video. WHICH I DID BUILD! Ha... But I'm saving for goggles now, and after seeing these Sky 03's. I think these are gonna be the ones I'm going to get. Love the color too. So thank you for getting me set upin the hobby. And all the information you provid for these products really help me in making decisions. KEEP IT UP!

[@flimunki114]

Skyzone seem to be the only manufacturer (possibly with the exception of ORQA) who are actually learning from their mistakes and listening to the community. Not only did they amend the design of the original 03's after a few reviews which criticized the fit they have now come out with an updated version with not only better screens but again looking at the fit issues and giving you face plate options and a wide head strap, cheap items to include which can make a massive difference when it come to using them. If you use modules they are possibly not for you but you do always have the option of using something like a dock king and connecting to the av in so it's not the end of the world. My personal experience of skyzone receivers is that they are generally pretty good, if your not flying in dense trees or bando's then with some decent antenna they are pretty good.

[@uneekpcs]

Sky zones for me. They are listening and they're responding fast to people's wants. Switchable 4:3 / 16:9 in a goggle would be great

[@UAVfutures]

do you really think you would use this feature, it would just crop the screen. I see people comment on this but have never met ANYONE who actually does crop their image?

[@uneekpcs]

@@UAVfutures I am only just starting out in the hobby so don't fully understand how it all works yet (sooo much to learn). I got Dom V3 as I prefer the wideness of 16 by 9. Probably my ignorance and lack of understanding but seems like it would be great to have the option of both native ratios without the cropping if that's possible?. I like the way Skyzone seem to listen to the customer base and the way they try out new things like the forward facing camera, the swappable face plate and option to put the battery on the side of the headband whether the majority of people use it or not they give the option and they try to innovate so good on em.

[@GreenEyesFromGondor]

Their customer support has been top notch. I purchased these goggles on presale, after arriving I noticed they wouldn’t stay powered up but over Facebook chat I had a response in under 2 hours and shortly after troubleshooting replacements scheduled. Can’t beat first person experience. Hopefully my replacements come quickly!!

[@DavidReynolds-kr6yh]

Kim Ekberg , I hope that you get a quick response, because I love my v02+ goggles, even the range is very good. I’m sure that you’ll be happy with your experience.

[@IanF-FPV]

Really....never really know them for customer support. Please keep us posted perhaps on Rcgroups?

[@GreenEyesFromGondor]

Just got them sent off today so hopefully I’ll hear back from them by tomorrow about the exchange!

[@GreenEyesFromGondor]

Got the replacements about a week and half ago and that are working perfectly! Never did cost me anything but the wait time to send them off to China. Skyzone made a believer of me!

[@IanF-FPV]

@@GreenEyesFromGondor oh wow. That's great to hear. I ordered a pair myself about a week ago during the anniversary sale.

[@alloutofdonuts3998]

Are these going to be digital compatible?? I thought they were but now I’m confused.

[@s.n.7192]

I am fairly new to fpv quads and doing serious research on upgraded goggles. These are some serious contenders. Now I just have to decide for myself if I will utilize having the ability to use diversity receiver modules... hmmm.

[@Sebijr]

I saw a comparaison side by side with the Hdo and image looks definately better. I only regret there is no bay for external module. Technology's module reception is improving and price will probably go down. The new TBS fusion is only 120usd. I would rather spend extra money to get the best reception

[@UAVfutures]

this is a great point. what if they made one that had a module bay?

[@Sebijr]

@@UAVfutures I will buy them for sure ! Orca is coming soon with was presented as the best new futur quality image goggles but if I'm not mistaken they will go for 650 USD. Way too expensive for most of us ! And I guess Skyzone could even offer a cheaper price as they won't have to include a diversity receiver. They will become the best value on the market. Thanks for reading me, I'm honored you answered me :)

[@JennaCee]

Hi Stu, what antenna's would you recommend for use with this goggle?

[@drewschultzfpv1454]

Oscar's video makes the new Sky Zones look better he recorded the in view picture with the same flight with the HDO`s.. the sky zones looked a bit sharper:-)

[@UAVfutures]

awesome. they really do have an amazing picture. is that oscar liang ?

[@Marksmonkey1980]

@@UAVfutures ☝️👍

[@drewschultzfpv1454]

@@UAVfutures yup

[@corduroycondom]

I just got into FPV and I wanted to buy the DJI FPV Experience ones. How do you think these compare to the DJI ones?

[@UAVfutures]

VERY VERY DIFFERENT, completely different tech, I think these are cheaper, lighter, fit better work with most current FPV drones etc, but the DJi have some high res magic in them that is also pretty cool.

[@corduroycondom]

@@UAVfutures Thank you very much for the respone. Well yes, thats what I saw in a video from Le Drib, the quality is incomparable and the range seems to be better too.

[@corduroycondom]

@@UAVfutures could you please recommend a brand of FC's that would work well with the DJI goggles. Is Matek Systems Ok?

[@v_ktr4358]

These things look really good. I'm just starting with FPV right when we are starting to switch do digital systems. Im intrigued where this hobby will go next.

[@matthewarchibald5118]

Wow. This is a viable option to choose over the HDO, the signal looks pretty good as well. If it's compatible with future hd fpv systems, then I might consider it.

[@srossi88]

Looks good! I, like others, would like to see these with a module bay, but honestly they could simply offer it as a "core" version, no built in rx, sell it for $399... And then you basically have an HDO that's better and less money

[@ple7y]

these seem awesome, comparing to my old Skyzone goggles. Been wanting to upgrade for a while now, but couldn't decide what to get, the price range is huge for quality goggles, even bigger for folks not living in the US, having their standard... all in all, whould like to have them :)

[@UAVfutures]

id you see my recent comparison vid between aomway skyzone and FS?

[@ple7y]

@@UAVfutures i've seen a bunch of your videos including the comparison one, they've helped a bunch. my biggest problem with mine is the lack of integrated fan, especially here where the temperature got close to 40°C this summer, so i can say that the 1st thing i need in a new goggle set is a fan... so far i'm broke from buying all the new quad parts, and the goggles will sadly have to wait

[@theiceman1972]

I really like the fact that these have different face plates. I have a fat face and my fatsharks do pinch a bit. I have always wanted to put some heat to them and make it wider. Also I really like that I can get colors. I really may get the orange ones. I think the price is right as well. THese may just be my new sets. I dont go to races, just flying around where i live.For the price I think I may be buying these.

[@smetlydc2]

I was about to pull the trigger on some Skyzone 02c but now with the DJI FPV system that just came out I dont know what to do anymore. I might have to wait until next spring to make a decision.

[@dimbatfpv7860]

Jono is so smart, solving the module bay issue with a dock station! That's what i would get and i bet it would still be cheaper than HDO plus rapidfire. I just wonder why the sky03O don't auto-switch between 4:3 and 16:9, that would make them complete.

[@SteveFuchs]

I am just getting into the hobby and I'm curious as to what the benefits of head tracking are?

[@tabdougherty8549]

I have never had a problem with built in receivers. In the Aomway or skyzone goggles. Simple and always work, and the modules are plenty sensitive. And john was right about the docking option if you must have rapidfire and it would probably work even better mounted on a tripod instead of your head LOL. If money was not an object I would buy the HDO,s and rapidfire because I have never owned a fatshark set, The question is would I regret it? And end up buying the skyzone set the first time they went on sale anyway. Probably :}

[@FlyerTuck]

I'm a FatShark guy. With that being said, they look like great goggles. I'm sure ya can't go wrong with them!

[@UAVfutures]

which ones are you using?

[@FlyerTuck]

@@UAVfutures I've got HDO's with a Furious-Dx.

[@JohnWhite84]

Gotta love running a patch antenna and staring directly at the ground.

[@noahreinhart3555]

I have had mine for a couple weeks now. hands down my fav goggle to date. I sold my hd3's the next day after these got to the house.

[@UAVfutures]

how have they been going? what do you love most about them?

[@jarodfpv1099]

Given the opportunity($$$) I would go with Skyzone. They are cheaper than the fatsharks but still offer a great all in one solution. However in my opinion the HDO's are more future proof being able to upgrade modules. I have the EV800D's at the moment and hope to upgrade in a year or so. Great review as always Stew!

[@jhardiman3]

Great review. I think it's time I pulled the trigger on these bad boys. No module....thats is both good and bad - simplicity really can be a great thing in the field.

[@licensetodrive9930]

Nice, but I'm still keeping the 50 degrees FOV of my HD2's.

[@powdermonkey447]

licensetodrive Me too. I've been using my HD2s since 2016 and they are still doing their job.

[@lusanc]

Very nice video!! ..."we have to wait and see what happens to the JDI system and all that sort of stuf"... Skyzone O3O have more ress that the DJIs? Thanks

[@Jdogg5343]

HDO is still King. The O3O'S are a close second for those not doing long distance or are in environments with alot of multipathing. Oscar Liang just put out his vid and blog on the O3O and he says they have taken the crown. But it really comes down to which goggle works best for what YOU need them for... I would say it is super close and big ups to Skyzone for what they can acheive. Keep it up! You've now got alot of people's attention. What are you gonna do to keep it?! Innovation and usability is key.