For anybody wondering why he just shot her without a care. Its because she had a hand in one of his comrades death. They had a previous encounter where she lost control of her horse and he tried to help bring the horse to heel which he did. But one of her compatriot got butt hurt of why this commoner(he was in disguise) dare lift his head in front them, pulls a sword to kill him but his friend jumped in to take the sword. Fast forward to now and you have this women showing off her riding skill which is pretty much an insult to his fallen friend. Had she been such a great rider his friend would still be alive. So bang!!!
@lopezalehandro16667 жыл бұрын
Thanks, that context was pretty important.
@blugaledoh26696 жыл бұрын
Well, at least she isn't stupid. She know she could died. But she took the chance anyways. Taro, the man who kill his friend was also a stupid. His father Shingen paid the compensation for his friend death, and he even apologized with own mouth.
@blugaledoh26696 жыл бұрын
After that scene, I heard the Takeda retreat believing it to be bad luck. One Takeda retainer went and graduated Kenshin for his markmenship.
@manusiabumi76735 жыл бұрын
She's an enemy soldier and this is war, that should be more than enough context and justification to shoot her
@Hachizukatenzo5 жыл бұрын
Everybody says that, but basically she did nothing back in that scene. Her horse got out of control and she tried just to control it. Actually, it's the son of Takeda Shingen who cut down Uesugi's retainer in that scene. The *real reason* is that she provokes her enemies by stepping in the river (the Sai river I assume). She goes beyond her part of the river and she is sent to the sanzu river (the japanese styx) by Kenshin. Simply.
@tongkhufrancois8011 Жыл бұрын
It is a very BEAUTIFULL scene! Congrats !!! The scene, The color, The actors in a meaning scene! A Masterpiece!
@wolfzwizdom5 жыл бұрын
Lady Yae: I challenge any Echigo warrior to a duel! Echigo Warrior: How bout i challenge you in bed? *Thunderous LOLs* Kenshin: .... *Bang*
@maxigoyeneche65882 жыл бұрын
xddddd
@DonPeyote4206 жыл бұрын
play sengoku games, win jidai prizes
@theadministrator2641 Жыл бұрын
LMAOOOOO
@nguyenhuy67422 жыл бұрын
- Bro has: + the high ground + a gun. - Girl has: + great horse riding skill.
@AlijahSorensen-omega2 ай бұрын
Yep, you can’t always defeat a young lady with a sword. But if you’re talking about guns here. You might as well how to just end her.
@tankman3425 Жыл бұрын
Men:Making dirty jokes Kenshin:I'm not going to laugh *BANG*
@lightnesstraveling2 жыл бұрын
This is a pretty difficult scene for anyone unfamiliar with Bushido to understand. This is not a revenge killing; Kenshin knows that Yae had no hand in his friend's death. Takeda even called the man who killed him an idiot for having done so, and thinking the men mere commoners even compensated the death. Rather, it's the director's intentional portrayal of a paradoxical act of honor that must inevitably result in senseless destruction. Lady Yae is essentially engaging in an honorable suicide. She already knows that no man will challenge her because she is a woman. Consequently, she forces a confrontation by entering the river and placing herself within range of Kenshin's arquebus. The ultimate insult to her bravery would have been to have dismissed her challenge as unworthy. But Kenshin respects her; he's the only one who doesn't laugh. And the only way he can maintain her honor is to kill her.
@outsideiskrrtinsideihurt6992 жыл бұрын
Dude, “Bushido” didn’t exist pre-Edo period. Realistically, if Lady Yae rode down with her vassals, Kenshin would’ve likely ordered an entire line of teppo to mow them down.
@lightnesstraveling2 жыл бұрын
@@outsideiskrrtinsideihurt699 Well, I'm not a dude, and this is a work of dramatic filmmaking about a story that's commonly used in Japanese culture to illustrate the conflict between the traditional honor and pragmatic utility. Contemporary Japanese understand the ethic of honor through Bushido, though its tradition is much older. Lady Yae is a created character, an "onna-musha" introduced to further the story's theme. And if the period is the issue, she's somewhat anachronistically modeled on the "Jōshitai", Nakano Takeko... who was gunned down after carrying a naginata into the battlefield without permission during the Battle of Aizu at the culmination of the Boshin War in 1868 (the transition from Edo to Meiji) . There's an understood context to all of this.
@The_Gallowglass Жыл бұрын
@@outsideiskrrtinsideihurt699 The term bushido is a later term, yes, but the concepts within began maybe even as early as the 12th century with Minamoto no Yoritomo, first shougun of the Kamakura.
@rafaa4988 Жыл бұрын
@@The_Gallowglassand no one gave shit about it. Next you will say that at some point battles looked like honorable duels 1vs1 after formal call outs. Its time to end this made up stories spreaded by bored edo period scribbler that romanticized war. Go back watching anime.
@jhonrambo421411 ай бұрын
This is more entertaining than napoleon ridley scot making😅
It wasn't actually Lady Yae fault his friend died, Taro was the one who actually kill him. In the original edition, Takeda Shingen actually verbally apologized after he threw the gold.
@brendanzhang74882 жыл бұрын
really doesnt matter,is the gold gonna revive kenshin friend?
@Orendiz2 жыл бұрын
@@brendanzhang7488 No but it can extend/better the life of someone temporally. Its ofc not enough for the cost of someone's life nor does really matter in the end, but at least its not nothing.
@Orendiz2 жыл бұрын
@晶水の野望 정수의 야망 Jungsu's Ambition its not about him killing her, its about how he killed her.
@Orendiz2 жыл бұрын
@晶水の野望 정수의 야망 Jungsu's Ambition not literally...
@hectorguerrero35967 жыл бұрын
Cool! I wish I could watch these movies in their entirety.
@smoothcriminal72324 жыл бұрын
The movie title is Heaven and Earth
@DonPeyote4206 жыл бұрын
"ama go encourage everyone" (is the first casualty)
@Hachizukatenzo5 жыл бұрын
Why Kenshin killed Yae ? Because she provoked Uesugi men for a duel and went further by stepping in the river. She basically violated the natural border between the two armies and was shot for it. In the scene everyone relates to, it's Takeda's son who kills the retainer. Not Yae. If Kenshin wanted to avenge his man for that reason, he'd better have killed the son or Yae's horse.
@Delta-2-04 жыл бұрын
I think you got the names wrong takeda shingen was the guy with the rifle uesugi kenshin is the husband of the female warrior that got shot Edit: After checking the flags the red one are carrying the Takeda Flag My mistake sorry
@Hachizukatenzo4 жыл бұрын
@@Delta-2-0 Little tip : Takeda is always associated to red color. ;-) I'd advice you to watch the movie too, it's worth watching.
@Delta-2-04 жыл бұрын
@@Hachizukatenzo already seen it loved the battle scenes
@thrudgelmirkenshin32673 жыл бұрын
because she let almost killed my retainer taro he's one who paid the price so i don't hesitate to shoot yae down i'm regret it? no.
@Hachizukatenzo3 жыл бұрын
@@thrudgelmirkenshin3267 according to your logic, he should have shot the horse and not the onna bugeisha, not mention it's not even Yae who cut the vassal down. You guys totally miss the point, the symbolism and the character here. You should learn about the actual Uesugi kenshin and the sengoku period. There is much more than a petty vengeance in this scene.
@felipezilli14757 жыл бұрын
Challenge to a duel in the bed, hilarious!
@denlsgulphe.fournier45857 жыл бұрын
Edson Zilli Edo 0
@felipezilli14757 жыл бұрын
???
@oddish22535 жыл бұрын
She was trying to Martyr herself so that her army would fight. Kenshin was trying to honor her wish.
@DonPeyote4203 жыл бұрын
@@oddish2253I really don't understand how that's supposed to work: isn't death discouraging?
@PennTankerGuy6 жыл бұрын
Nice shot.
@Troiks214 жыл бұрын
This was personal shot.
@ServantOfOdin5 ай бұрын
It was. She was responsible for a good friends death earlier.
@davidbell161911 ай бұрын
I like he shoots a matchlock with no match in serpent. Kool!
@crimsoncrusader48292 жыл бұрын
kind of surprised it wasn't a bow and arrow. I'm more used to Oda or Tokugawa when it comes to gun during the Sengoku era.
@brendanzhang74882 жыл бұрын
major daimyos all had guns,but oda or tokugawa use it most effectively
@patriotenfield32762 жыл бұрын
Portuguese introduced matchlock arquebuses to Japan around the end of 15th century and early 16th century. so It is not a surprise to me. in fact you should give a peek into the imjin and chongyu wars when samurais invaded Korea and made heavy use of tanegashima against not so modernised Korean troops (who had cannons and rockets, which Japan lacked at that time , but surprisingly no guns, which Japan had plenty of them)
@FIQJFIhfyYeo1of2 жыл бұрын
3:00 「ほら、見ろ...」
@matheusborges29667 жыл бұрын
What is The name of The film?
@smoothcriminal72327 жыл бұрын
Heaven and Earth
@matheusborges29667 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much :))
@pakopako12056 жыл бұрын
Its Called kill the feminazi bitch
@Hachizukatenzo2 жыл бұрын
Ten to Chi to
@citycobra7 жыл бұрын
Japanese Warlords know exactly how to treat a woman!
@chakanyo27685 жыл бұрын
You xy freaks will encourage killing and treating women bad and yet you still wonder why there are many man hatuuurrs nowadays.
@sentra66612 жыл бұрын
@@chakanyo2768 is not about that threating bad a woman, her choice to challenge a man kills her. Even in today wars will hapend in the same way. Any general challenged by anyone will have the same answer to give. Specialy if is a women or a low rank oficer or soldier.
@patriotenfield32762 жыл бұрын
it's revenge for a friend.
@citycobra2 жыл бұрын
@@patriotenfield3276 A true womanizer.
@gotaro-latbi4 ай бұрын
Can someone tell me the name of the movie?
@captainpinky83077 жыл бұрын
well she wanted to play with the big boys...
@lordishigami24336 жыл бұрын
Looks like the Red Army
@hannibalburgers4772 жыл бұрын
I played Shogun 2. Oda Clan plays much like Red Army, swarming your enemy with cheap peasants. Takeda (Red Guys) plays more like France in Med2, relaying on heavy cavalry, and hammer and anvil tactics
@Takeda_Katsuyori2 жыл бұрын
@@hannibalburgers477 Red Cavalry
@nurseryrhymesforkids66322 жыл бұрын
The Samurai and the Ashigaru after his Retainer burned her: *Cause of death: LMFAO*
@ConstantineJoseph2 жыл бұрын
I guess Takeda Shingen could not do without women while being away on campaign so he had to form this "Amazonian" cavalry guard unit to perform two duties, duel in bed and duel in the field. That said, by the medieval era, combat was purely fought by the men as armor weight increased dramatically. I mean even during the ancient era, warrior women were only for gladiatorial spectacles. Perhaps the only real example is the Amazonian warriors of the Scythians who like the Japanese, fought on mounts.
@The_Gallowglass Жыл бұрын
Armor weight never really weighed that much, especially when well fitted to the wearer. That part is easy for a warrior or soldier to master. The main detriment to wearing armor is the heat that builds up in the torso and head, from a cuirass and helmet. That's what really saps your endurance and your brain power, in battle.
@ConstantineJoseph Жыл бұрын
@@The_Gallowglass Agreed. However the weight that Roman legionaries carry is no joke. At the height of empire and technology, the weight was 7 kg with the segmentata plate armor. But most of the time Romans or the medieval combatant wore full chainmail or lorica hamata that weighs 11 to 12 kg with an internal gambeson. So for a woman it's not really feasible. Given that average height of warriors at that time ranged from 5'3 to 5'7. The women are even shorter at 5' as average or lower. The Germans and the Nordic Vikings did have shieldmaidens as combatants but they are few and far between. One can assume these women are like their male compatriots having a taller than average 5'10, 5'11 as in the Viking warriors average height. The typical Danish Viking and the Viking Rus of Novgorod/Kiev was noted by the Byzantines to have an average height of 5'11. Therefore it depended on the culture and the demographics that utilized women in combat
@The_Gallowglass Жыл бұрын
@@ConstantineJoseph Well, then we're getting into gear they're carrying around. Roman soldiers carried a lot of weight, but they wouldn't be carrying that during a battle. That would all be taken care of by the non-combatant helpers. In the fight they'd have their armor, shield, sword, spear /pilum, assuming they're a legionary. All depends on the era, but they'd get close enough to throw their pila and all they'd have left is their sword, shield, helmet and cuirass. Late period they'd pretty much all go back to maille.
@jhonrambo421411 ай бұрын
This is more entertaining than napoleon ridley scot making😅
@Ravej2017 Жыл бұрын
What's the name of this movie
@八幡太郎-p5z2 жыл бұрын
ラスト侍の映画は嘘で、16世紀の侍は大量の銃を保有しており、戦の序盤は銃撃戦でした。
@lopezlirio4004 Жыл бұрын
was scared of a woman and kill her with a gun ☠
@torreeric4992 жыл бұрын
1:46 salute to these ladies for being badasses... Then again, it would've been much better if the men do the close combat fighting and the women do most of the long range like shooting arrows or firing muskets... Anyway this is just my opinion... 😊🙂
@theloniusmonk1263 Жыл бұрын
What film is this?
@lantern256 Жыл бұрын
Heaven & Earth.
@mohammadjavadamoa95732 жыл бұрын
Great
@regulustheron25652 жыл бұрын
What movie is this?
@BlackEyeGames10 ай бұрын
what show is this?
@VLADIMIR007ISH2 жыл бұрын
I dont see Tom Cruise
@VivianGarza-g3k4 ай бұрын
Lewis Joseph Hernandez Cynthia White Michelle
@smuffinman5 ай бұрын
based
@withastickangrywhiteman28227 жыл бұрын
Bitch: wawawa, wawawa!!! Warrior in black armor: What? nigga? (Bang!)
@patriotenfield32762 жыл бұрын
the fact karensusan has not deleted this comment really amuses me a lot!