UK Carrier Strike Group Suez Canal transit

[@Wanderer628]

The shot of all the warships going through the canal in a column was awesome.

[@noodles169]

Great shot. It reminds me of an old black and white war movie like sink the Bismarck 😎👍

[@frankmueller6522]

Go forward, Great-Britain! Long live the Nato! Long live freedom! Down with all dictatorships and terrorists all around the world! Best wishes from Germany!

[@generaldreedle2801]

Reminds me of the famous Time magazine front cover screaming the Empire strikes back when the Task Force was heading to the Falklands.👍

[@joyceycousteau]

That's the last time I have seen HM Royal Navy flex her muscles. April 82.

[@oscarmuffin4322]

That wasn't Time magazine.

[@generaldreedle2801]

@@oscarmuffin4322 Are you sure?

[@joyceycousteau]

It was newsweek

[@generaldreedle2801]

@@joyceycousteau Ok my mistake. Thanks for that👍

[@geecee310]

Great to see this collective effort from across the UK, thanks to ship builders in Tyneside, Appledore, Birkenhead, Portsmouth, Glasgow and Rosyth. 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

[@PhilbyFavourites]

Nicely put 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

[@AWMJoeyjoejoe]

A true team effort which we can all be proud of.

[@joenop3393]

So Glad to see the British with such a Beautiful and Modern Carrier!

[@simonbird1973]

@untilweeven Your name should be Uneducated, if you scaled up the the size of the UK’s economy & population, we wouldn’t be far behind you. You should be glad your closest ally is gearing up military again. I get the feeling you’ve never done a days service for your Country!!

[@GoreTexTillEndEx]

@@simonbird1973 These people are all the same; always gobbing off online about this and that because social media is the only place they can voice their opinions and their anonymity is protected. If they’d served any time in their countries’ armed forces (and especially if they worked with us) their opinion would be very different.

[@andrewb9790]

Quick lads, they're filming this! Bring every plane we have and spread them out on the deck to try and make it look good! What do you mean thks is all we've got? Shh! Don't tell the Russians that this is the whole compliment of planes for the 2 carriers we've built!

[@dynaztycrashdiet]

@untilweeven More like your comment is a joke. How old are you 10?

[@lancebloke]

@@andrewb9790 Well, apart from its not. But I'm guessing you just wanted to make a silly comment to somehow stick to em.

[@sfoeric]

Brilliant stuff! So glad the US has a role to play in HMS Queen Elizabeth’s CSG.

[@355PH]

USA saved us in 1944. Working together with them now also makes the UK 🇬🇧 happy and safe 🙏🙏😊🤝💪

[@oddmodbod2103]

We can only supply an half strength squadron (617) ...So QE has US F35 ...Embarrassing.. Sailing though the Med 3 and 11 squadron had to fly top cover using Typhoons out of Coningsby.. For all the flag waiving 🇬🇧..Monstrous Defence Cuts like never seen are killing our Armed Forces..😡

[@simonbird1973]

@@355PH Someone needs a lesson in history. That said the UK will always appreciate the sacrifice the United States of America made in WW2 along with countless other Nations including the USSR & the British Empire to mention a few. So yeah, thanks 😂

[@355PH]

@Astolfo Desu - Still very proud to serve with our brothers from the USA 🇺🇸🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧💪💪💪

[@snick260]

@@355PH usa didn't save the UK haha 😆

[@deanhankio6304]

There is a hidden underwater mine somewhere. Denmark has nothing to do with that.

[@simonhulmesh]

Then it's a good job CSG21 brought a minesweeper with it!

[@Autofleet4429]

The Royal Navy has has a whole taskforce of mine warfare vessels in the middle east that they can if necessary call upon.

[@gamedayswede]

@@Autofleet4429 I think he was ironic

[@anthony49812]

Everyone thats into football will get your joke mate 😄👍

[@ITER345]

Hope not as its an international carrier group!

[@PBurns-ng3gw]

Pulling security for this must've been a nightmare.

[@rhodes1948]

Stunning display of power

[@arealbobbydazzler2520]

We'll I wouldn't want it rolling up in my back yard 😮

[@Richard-yp1dd]

Perhaps, or not. China have 10x more ships than us, and produce 5x as many ships as the US Navy per year.

[@liondecka9062]

@@Richard-yp1dd perhaps or not 🤣👎

[@mattcraven7188]

@@Richard-yp1dd China go for quantity over quality, plus most of there navy is poorly trained.

[@noodles169]

@@mattcraven7188 yep. The Chinese are to scared to sail out of their own green waters, while these badboys are sailing around the world having a right old jolly 🇺🇲🇬🇧🇳🇱

[@dtothebtotheh]

Carrier Strike groups are a pretty amazing sight, this British one looks amazing💪🏼✌🏻

[@iemjgf]

Of all the photos I have seen of the Queen Elizabeth and her F35’s the most notable are those showing the F35 coming over the stern of the carrier in the new landing system. Compared to the F18’s high speed landing and grabbing the arrester wire it is slow and short. Really amazing. People should have pride in our little country. First in all the aspects of carrier development. The first in all the following, carrier, carrier landing, angled flight deck, steam catapult, illuminated carrier landing system, vtol aircraft, the Harrier , forerunner of the F35, ramp take-off, carrier specifically constructed for the F35b, and finally the most beautiful and gracious landing system you could ask for.

[@dtothebtotheh]

@@iemjgf yeah, the entire set up looks really impressive

[@ramal5708]

@@iemjgf F-35, the overprized, overextended fighter project? Its like stealthy, upgunned and better technology F-16 and Harrier Jump jet combined together

[@iemjgf]

If you think a carrier strike group is impressive today , an American Task Force in World War Two would have blown your socks off. Four battleships, six Essex class fleet carriers, two or three light carriers several heavy cruisers, numerous destroyers and a fleet train stretching back for miles. That was one, and they had about three of them. The Japanese did not have a prayer. Yamamoto was perfectly correct ,the Japanese had indeed woke up a sleeping giant.

[@johnreid4056]

Fantastic i was on HMS Fearless last time went through its awsome

[@ReynaxisSolutions]

So glad to see a Royal Navy carrier strike group after the Falklands War.

[@nzer57]

It's a death trap full stop. There's no where on this planet you can hide and you can bet your left nut that every strike group would be dead in the water within 24hrs of a major conflageration.

[@ReynaxisSolutions]

@ElChivo 105 i heard they have lost their might at sea before so it's nice to see them back.

[@TofuBoi_]

I would assume during wartime, this canal would be a death trap.

[@noodles169]

Yeah. Think the last time, it was Israel at war with surrounding counties. The Suez got mined to FUUK. Took 8yrears before it was made safe again

[@donjones4719]

That's why in WW 1 and 2 the Brits had large forces stationed in Egypt, and why they were so reluctant to give full independence to Egypt for so long.

[@iemjgf]

Most of the desert army’s supplies came through the canal after a long voyage round the Cape. For the Empire it was one of its most important links.

[@nzer57]

It's a death trap full stop. There's no where on this planet you can hide and you can bet your left nut that every strike group would be dead in the water within 24hrs of a major conflageration.

[@pauljohnson1664]

It feels so good to be British right now.

[@malahammer]

Brexit? :)

[@pauljohnson1664]

@@malahammer And the future kzbin.info/www/bejne/mpCkl3-hhrCDmJI

[@axle.australian.patriot]

Welcome back to the real western world kin 🙏

[@malahammer]

@@pauljohnson1664 good luck with that....Australia has already screwed the UK with a trade deal!

[@tommarshall1660]

Boris Johnston and the tory sleaze???

[@lewis211]

Defenders of democracy, Britain is on its way back! 🇺🇸🇬🇧🇨🇦🇳🇿🇦🇺

[@JCStaling]

It seems the Anglophone nations are the last defenders of Western Civilisation.

[@TommyBahama84]

Yes, the rest of Europe appear to have given up. No surprises there

[@gelirgecer9395]

@@JCStaling thats maybe truth but they wiped out civilisations and stole lands

[@ultraman5168]

Many of the Asian nations are now more fervent guardians of freedom than much if the EU. Sad to see, but I hope it can be changed. The UK leads by example for a Europe which needs to recapture it's individuality and purpose.

[@ultraman5168]

@@gelirgecer9395 same song and dance for all nations throughout history. The 'imperialist' western nations were just more successful at it. And democratic nations have moved past that into an era of cooperation, mutual respect, and beneficence. It's not we that still spread chaos and oppression through the world. We're the only nations making any sort of attempt to stem the tide.

[@sarribel]

Spectacular. Mighty procession across the mighty land of Pharaohs. Britain is back East of Aden

[@iemjgf]

For what reason? How about showing the flag in Canada, Australia and New Zealand, our Commonwealth brothers and firm allies.

[@ramal5708]

Only Britain? You forgot the Arleigh Burke class destroyer in the convoy as well, plus other commonwealth ships and personel as well.

[@iemjgf]

@@ramal5708 I am trying to find where I said “only Britain”. Can you help me please, by writing the sentence.

[@ramal5708]

@@iemjgf" Britain is back in Aden", sorry I meant from the main comment

[@wibb20000]

The music is great. Proud to be 🇬🇧🇬🇧 great to see this new aircraft carrier

[@ramal5708]

Gerald R Ford enters the chat

[@wibb20000]

@@ramal5708 and?

[@ramal5708]

Gerald R Ford>this carrier

[@wibb20000]

@@ramal5708 yeah and? When did I ever compare the two together?

[@emeraldcolorsky1194]

amazing ! Love from S.Korea.

[@kranson8514]

I wounder if our forces now how genuinely proud we are of them, honoured we are 😉

[@aerohk]

All those F-35 on the deck are American jets, replaced the British made Harrier. Not very proud.

[@kranson8514]

@@aerohkWe'll get them or the next generation so don't worry, the equipment isn't what make the our forces the men and wemon who serve most definitely do though.

[@randombritishguy2686]

@@aerohk just under half the f 35s are british, but what's wrong with letting the yanks tag along with thier f35s considering how long it take to make and ship the damn things.

[@Asethet]

Someone in supply was very confused about the requisition form for 4 pallets of Marlboro cigarettes, but there are a lot of ships in a Strike Group and they all need to get through the canal.

[@bebeguygoz6840]

No future accusation EVERGREEN..!! Good play and music.

[@tarqscam8491]

Awesome footage.

[@GBLynden]

So cool! 👊🏻💥👊🏻

[@jonathanwheeler4767]

Strange not a single person working on deck ?

[@Karedu.]

Vacation my budy

[@AndyH2023.]

Come and have a go if you think your big enough 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 glad to see us back!

[@davetrousers]

You're

[@AndyH2023.]

@@davetrousers didn’t ask for you to correct my spelling 👍🏼

[@355PH]

👍😂😂😂

[@355PH]

@@davetrousers - You tool!

[@Wild-Storm]

It depends if you can defend when the time comes. Hope you have you arm buoy in your pants!

[@jasonfernee2401]

Can anyone explain why HMS Queen Elizabeth wasn't flying the White Ensign? Great footage.

[@iemjgf]

I am not quite sure, but I think it has something to do with travelling through Egyptian territory.

[@ykdickybill]

🇬🇧🎵’ When I was a lad I served a term………I wrote those writs with a hand so free that now I am the ruler of the Queens Navy ! ‘🇬🇧

[@PBurns-ng3gw]

Absolutely beautiful ship. Feels like the Royal Navy's back in its element. (Not that they were ever out of their element, mind. Respect & love from across the pond.)

[@goldenboy1803]

Cant wait for the Tempest

[@tsloo1620]

Yeah bro

[@wibb20000]

@@tsloo1620 when is it coming?

[@iemjgf]

You had better hope that it does not get cancelled. Remember the TRS2. In design and function, Years ahead of its time. British design at its best . We could have abolished that feudal monstrosity, the Lords, and had a lovely plane.

[@josephkilfeather4047]

Interesting the jets are USMC and the Helicopter is Royal Navy on a British Aircraft Carrier.

[@shuki1]

I noticed that also. Curious what the reason is.

[@Benjd0]

It's a mixture at the minute, the UK have some F-35 on board and the USMC also do. The UK haven't received their full order of F-35 yet (Even with its full planned complement, technically they could fit a lot more aircraft) so as they plan on working closely with these new carriers they've used this opportunity to work together.

[@Hawthorn-nz]

Silly question probably, but would an accompanying sub go through too?

[@joking7081]

Good to see a UK naval presence moving towards to the south-east Asia area. CCP China needs to know that the freedom loving countries of the world will not put up with their bully tactics. Countries such as Australia has supported the UK through 2 world wars. Its good to see the UK now standing up for its friends and allied countries.

[@gbafongbafon]

Euro trash compared to us strike group its a joke

[@noodles169]

@@gbafongbafon America are part of this NATO fleet, idiot

[@Radictor44]

The British are coming!!! The British are coming!!!! (with some friends :D )

[@neil5307]

The original call was: 'the regulars are coming'..... both sides were British, which is part of the reason the British Army stopped fighting; no stomach for war against British Colonists back on the Houses of Parliament. And no financial benefit owning non tax paying Colonies which didn't produce much in the way of exportable crops.

[@JCStaling]

@@neil5307 I thought it was "The Redcoats are coming!" Which shows that the American colonists, even by 1775, thought of themselves as separate from the British.

[@neil5307]

@@JCStaling we can agree to differ. I think slight American revisionism paints it as a war won by heroic farmers against a professional army, but really it was Lafayette and his 15000 French soldiers who helped. There was cheering I the Houses of Parliament when the decision was made to stop fighting fellow Brits, and focus on fighting the French in France rather than a proxy war in an ultimately indefensible territory.

[@JCStaling]

@@neil5307 Differ on this we must, but as an American, and a former US Marine the "bonds of affection" between the US and the UK have never been stronger since WW2.

[@neil5307]

@@JCStaling Yes we can agree on that, well said.. .cheers

[@markmcloughlin3843]

What a beautiful ship

[@Madenity]

0:02 What jet is that

[@AnimeFan401]

F-35

[@billkingston4402]

Mean machine, I was sad when the Ark Royal was retired, the F35 is something else

[@wilsonedwards8189]

Best to have next level power projection. There are probably a lot of relieved Argentinian soldiers knowing their govt won't try anything again soon.

[@ramal5708]

@@wilsonedwards8189 why does Argentina have to do with it?

[@ramal5708]

F-35 is an upgunned, with new tech, F-16 and Harrier Jump jet combined with stealth technology, not to mention the hourly flying cost and maintenance cost

[@wilsonedwards8189]

@@ramal5708 google "argentina UK Falklands war". They've had a dispute for centuries that resulted in a war in 1982. It was close and some argue that the only reason the UK succeeded then was the US intervened through channels to guarantee UK would win. UK was in recession at the time and had undergone military cuts and was slightly vulnerable. The UK controlling the Falklands means they will have a large amount of needed resources, incl natural gas and oil. Being able to project power with the Queen Elizabeth means essentially no nation other than US or China can effectively challenge the UK navy(and arguably the Chinese might have a hard time against two UK carriers). I'm a former US soldier who spoke with a British commando who fought there.

[@ramal5708]

@@wilsonedwards8189 I know about Falklands fiasco but why would Argentina try to do anything with rhe British? They have probably much better things to do than challenging the British again

[@KindaGross]

track goes hard

[@axle.australian.patriot]

It felt good from my subs 👍

[@Gripenace]

Respect! There should be a submarine or two within this mission, often not to be confirmed ;)..... how do they pass?

[@G1NZOU]

There is confirmed to be one Astute class within CSG21, though I don't believe it's confirmed which one, it probably passes while surfaced as the Suez draft is something like 66ft and the Astute draft is 33ft, so not a whole lot of room to transit while submerged.

[@noodles169]

Put them in the hanger deck 👍

[@turbine6338]

During Night hours is the best way for subs, that is if the subs are waiting in the Indian Ocean.

[@georgebarnes8163]

@@G1NZOU Nuclear powered vessels are not permitted to use the Suez canal.

[@curioussand1339]

Submerged and hidden between two warships

[@oinamronenzaaa4923]

Are they again coming to loot?

[@Richy076]

Now you have mentioned it I wouldn't mind (This is a joke)

[@ajwest3081]

Do the F35 cockpits not degrade in the hot sun?

[@joyceycousteau]

Cockpit canopy has multiple filters. So not really.

[@ajwest3081]

@@joyceycousteau still I’m surprised they leave them out in full on sun in that part of the world

[@axle.australian.patriot]

@@ajwest3081 I think they are subject to far more stresses in the air and at altitude then they would be sitting in the sun on the deck :)

[@ThatCarGuy]

As someone else said they have special UV filters on them as when you are above the clouds the sun is much brighter, hence why the helmet visors are tinted with UV filters as well. So while the sun baking on them will degrade them, it's such a slow process it's negligible.

[@dzulkafleysamad4980]

Please do video coverage when its passing through straits of malacca n its maritim exercise with the FPDA forces.

[@deanstephens2876]

Would the submarine go round. And not through the Suez canal.?

[@eyesofisabelofficial]

No the sub had gone through first.

[@deanstephens2876]

@@eyesofisabelofficial Really. Wow thanks for the reply, I would of thought it would of gone round. I didn't know that subs used the Suez or the Panama canal.

[@ramal5708]

Classic show of force transit

[@dsdy1205]

I guess we should be glad they didn't get stuck as well

[@nosaltadded2530]

Warships are smaller than container ships with considerably more powerful engines and faster response times.

[@dsdy1205]

@@nosaltadded2530 Don't think the QE is that much smaller in this case

[@nosaltadded2530]

@@dsdy1205 HMS Queen Elizabeth. Length: 920'. Beam: 128'. Draft: 36'. Displacement 65,000 tons. Installed power: 46 MW total. Speed: 32 knots. Ever Given: Length: 1,312'. Beam: 192' 11". Draft: 47' 7" to a maximum of 52' 6". Displacement" 220,940 Gross tons. Installed power: 59,300 kW. Speed: 22.8 knots. Any questions?

[@dsdy1205]

@@nosaltadded2530 Yeah. Why so snide?

[@nosaltadded2530]

@@dsdy1205 Snide?

[@kristianmolloy8622]

that music as QE passes damn i want that music

[@anthonyscott609]

What is worth investing in CRYPTOCURRENCY OR GOLD?

[@TommyBahama84]

🇬🇧 🇺🇸 🇨🇦 🇦🇺 🇳🇿

[@frankmueller6522]

Best wishes from Germany to our friends and allies from the English speaking countries! But you have forgotten Ireland!

[@magnusqwerty]

Why the music 🎶🐟👅🙈?

[@NGaugeVideo]

Don't get stuck like the Evergreen😂

[@thequietkid8358]

@AK103 MT I can smell the fire 🔥

[@paxster76]

People on the Suez must be like, "some sh!ts about to go down.."

[@planerunner4020]

Lol they must have paid around 130,000 for every ship and the AC should be around 400,000. unless somehow egypt gave them a discount

[@noodles169]

UK don't have to pay. The built the Suez

[@planerunner4020]

@@noodles169 not really, and nope it dosent work like that

[@baginatora]

Are they headed to Italy?

[@bestamerica]

' honor and salute to UK royal navy services

[@NordleM20]

i believe you have to have a pilot on board to run the canal, would a war ship allow a foreign pilot on board?

[@Richy076]

I was thinking that exact thing

[@JCStaling]

That was cool.

[@MrBobconner1952]

Why are the decks so empty?

[@fredericdelmedico5251]

where is the royal air force ?

[@5taunch]

The man dem are here 🇬🇧🇺🇸

[@DanM012324]

Where does the submarine escort go? the canal isn't deep enough for it to stay submerged so does it peel off and do something else while another sub is waiting on the other side of the canal and pickup escort duties?

[@madmanjoe1002]

It will already be on the other side. One for the Mediterranean, one for the other side?

[@shuki1]

Submarines are required to transit the canal on the surface and do once in a while. Sometimes like would be in a case like this where a whole force is travelling together and sometimes as a show of force to enemies in the relevant places.

[@viky2786]

One question if vertical landing failed in f35 then what next?

[@jaybatsford]

I would imagine that protocols are firmly in place seeing as we've been using VTOL aircraft for our carriers since the 80s.

[@noodles169]

F35BS have 3 ways of landing

[@WayTruthLife3]

Incredible!

[@gnolan4281]

The local Egyptians must be jaded and indifferent to such a spectacle. Just another day at the office for them? If it was me I'd be saying shiver me timbers WTF is THAT?!

[@iemjgf]

We were going from Port Suez to Port Said and into the Med. On the top section nearest to Port Said, on the left bank on a couple of occasions they turned round, bent over and showed their arses.

[@gnolan4281]

@@iemjgf Yikes! I was told they're not too keen on toilet tissue. Tennis anyone?

[@suburbia2050]

The most powerful and hi tech bit isn't even in view... The Astute class attack submarine

[@simonjackson7269]

They won't get stuck!!

[@brentsummers7377]

Nice day to shoot some footage from a F35 says a pilot. MOD accountant says: 'Can we sell the footage to some tv channels and get at least US 44,000, to break even on costs?'

[@fritzstudios8571]

About time Britain. The world needs your strength

[@greathorton]

This film was uploaded in 6 hours ago when I am watching. Where is her actual location? Asia is waiting for her.

[@noodles169]

On her way to visit you 😎👍

[@axle.australian.patriot]

We are looking forward to a visit from our kin folk 🍺 👍

[@madmattius]

How many F35's can she take captain! Looks like perhaps 20ish max, which is enough. Quite a large deck for a 65k tonne carrier.

[@FireAngelOfLondon]

The Royal Navy's web site says 24 fighters normally, 36 in surge mode. This is in addition to some helicopters to provide AWACS and electronic warfare capabilities. Total maximum aircraft complement is officially 40, same source. This is purely speculation but I believe the highly competent Royal Navy could cram in roughly 50 aircraft total and make it work if they were pressed, more would just make the air wing unsafe to operate. Unless you see a link to an official source you can dismiss any figure above 40 as unofficial speculation.

[@randombritishguy2686]

In a real life fully arm situation she would carry 24 fighters and 36 helicopters.

[@FireAngelOfLondon]

@Zuul Gatekeeper That is a commercial web site, a news organisation of dubious quality NOT the official site of ANY military organisation. THE FIGURES I QUOTED CAME FROM THE ROYAL NAVY'S SITE. The figure of 70 is rubbish and tells you that that site should be regarded as a waste of reading time.

[@jonesy66691]

What is with the battlefield music, are you going to war or something?

[@kostasangisoulaki912]

Nice ski ramp

[@wilsonedwards8189]

Those are F-35s? They are getting around. Maybe doing a world tour as a ocean test? How many ships in that group?

[@noodles169]

Something like 12 ships. A massive fleet including America and the Netherlands. Will also be joined by Australian and Japanese warships

[@haihengh]

@@noodles169 I think they maybe help Japan to ramp up Izumo F35 operation training too as Izumo just complete their modification for F35.

[@claudiopizzale4841]

Why do I instantly think of the BF4 campaign?

[@NordleM20]

very nice but how much did it cost to send them all down the canal?

[@lostxtro7540]

A few million pounds.

[@dtothebtotheh]

Where is this group headed? South China Sea?

[@JCStaling]

Have you been living under a rock without a phone?

[@dtothebtotheh]

Well yeah, I’ve pulled my back, I’ve been pretty much disabled for the last three weeks , thanks

[@JCStaling]

@@dtothebtotheh I didn't mean to be cruel. Just had a bad day is all.

[@dtothebtotheh]

@@JCStaling no harm mate

[@axle.australian.patriot]

Indo-Pacific region, we don't don't encourage them by calling it the SCS.

[@greghill7759]

ADMIRAL: "Oh, Captain!" CAPTAIN: "Yes sir?" ADMIRAL: "I trust we won't be doing an 'Ever Given', will we?" CAPTAIN: "Of course not, sir.... LEFT HAND DOWN A BIT!"

[@davetrousers]

ADMIRAL: Well we are about one third the size of the Ever Given so there shouldn't be a problem.

[@arwo1143]

I wonder how they protect their ships there…. They can’t make a big area around them that is a free of other ships and dangers because it’s land

[@dover455]

they don’t expect any threats

[@noodles169]

All those ships have phalanx, and 50cal mini guns, plus wildcats hovering above.

[@planerunner4020]

wait wtf? i thought egypt didnt allow any navy ship?

[@michabetaro3306]

Why refuse

[@johnfoster3286]

Its a UK Royal Navy ship but does it still have to have an egyptian pilot?

[@gamedayswede]

Yes

[@franciscruickshank8794]

of course it got an egyptian pilot! ppathetic lot the rn. have to get yanks to crew the ships, suppose the orders come from pentagon! little britain the us is using you in the coming war with china! but you have to folloow orders .SAOR ALBA

[@iemjgf]

All ships military or civil must carry a certificated Egyptian pilot. He is there to guide and advise the captain on navigating the waters of the canal and lakes.

[@mrwideboy]

Do do we have to pay for the transit considering the British paid and built it

[@noodles169]

Think all nations that use the Suez, pay towards the upkeep, and security of the passage

[@ahmadel-zebedy]

You mean to paid but used slaved labor which ended up killing 150 thousand Egyptian

[@mrwideboy]

@@ahmadel-zebedythe British was the first country in the world abolish slavery in 1833 the suez canal was built in1859. The arab muslim world still slaves,how do you think dubai is being built or the 2022 fifa world cup? The Islamic state still went around slaving people and women as sex slaves, because its in the quran. Look ar your own backyard

[@ahmadel-zebedy]

@@mrwideboy okay so you again basically ran away from the fact that 150 thousand Egyptian died from poor working conditions and slavery by the Brits abolishing the rule didn't really matter if you don't apply them these people were forced to do it somewhere like prison camps that's beside the colonisation which ended up with thousands dies so guess what these dead people didn't benefit from your so called anti slavery rules lol

[@ahmadel-zebedy]

@@mrwideboy second thing as I said they were FORCED to do it...mean while FIFA world cup is in Qatar not Dubai second thing these people come to these arab countries on there own will and sign up contracts on there own will nobody forced them to do.it

[@Lagoost]

Old aircraft carrier and destroyers, worried about the repair parts...

[@philipwood9526]

UK free of EU shackels and proud once more.

[@axle.australian.patriot]

Welcome back to the real west kin folk 🙏

[@stepheno21]

Can i ask, would a Suez Canal pilot jump on board and steer the QE while transiting the Canal or does this not apply to military vessels?

[@Autofleet4429]

If I remember correctly pilots don't direct military vessels directly but rather give the best advice of steering the vessel to the navigation officer/officer who has conduct of the ship instead.

[@jamesevans938]

I would guess so civilians are often abroad the ship and I guess any secretive/ important to national security stuff is hidden and the pilot would be on the bridge and only exit the bridge to leave the ship

[@stepheno21]

@@jamesevans938 ​ Thanks for the reply. I guess the blockage from the ever given has got me curious about whether it would be allowed. But It would make since that if Civilians are on board working that they could.

[@stepheno21]

@@Autofleet4429 Thanks for the reply back. Being a rather green in the Naval world. I thought it may have been a silly question lol. Either way whether the ship crew or the canal pilots are in control. Its impressive to see nonetheless.

[@sergarlantyrell7847]

@@Autofleet4429 Yes, I believe so. Asside from putting the fate of a nations's national security assets in the hands of another nation's civilian pilot, which is just not going to happen... military vessels are in general sufficiently dissimilar from the kind of cargo & passenger vessels that pilots are used to, so they would be more likely to crash than just directing the practiced helmsman.

[@malahammer]

Must not get stuck....Must not get stuck....Must not get stuck...................

[@JCStaling]

Don't even think about it.

[@jamesstone7283]

Get'em boys

[@JCStaling]

We will not kow-tow to China.

[@sjbict]

and girls.

[@jamesstone7283]

@@sjbict 😳 opps.

[@daisukekazumi2399]

I was a bit surprised to see the F-35Bs on the UK HMS Queen Elizabeth. Then I remembered the UK and US are allies lol

[@georgebarnes8163]

There are 6 British F35B on the QE along with 10 USMC F35b

[@glynnwright1699]

@@georgebarnes8163 Rolls Royce manufactures the lift engine for the F35B.

[@DrSteveGames]

The f35 was jointly designed by the UK.

[@georgebarnes8163]

@@glynnwright1699 The engine is American made by Pratt and Witney, RR makes the lift fan on the B model

[@georgebarnes8163]

@Mac’s Jack! only 6 are operational, 2 developed faults 2 weeks ago and are grounded.

[@minimax9452]

Great Britain has lost an empire and not yet found a role (Dean Acheson; 1962) Now they are playing empire with a silly aircraft carrier

[@lostxtro7540]

That's not strictly true.

[@minimax9452]

@@lostxtro7540 Global britain will not work out. Theformer colonies are not waiting to get supressed again. But the best cure against excessive fantasies is to try them out. Good luck!

[@lostxtro7540]

No one is going to get "suppressed". That's not what's it's about. Perhaps you should read the news a bit more often so you are informed.

[@Dominator_5]

Good thing i didn’t get stuck

[@garykb1]

It’s coming home.

[@andimuhjafar]

The world : The UK : send carrier strike!

[@sushiromifune7096]

Reminds me of the HMS Prince of Wales coming to Asia...

[@noodles169]

Does It also remind you of the thousands of other ships sunk on all sides during world war 2?

[@johnnyllooddte3415]

dont turn sideways

[@russellcarey2430]

UK Carrier Strike Group? The BBC said neither of these two new wonderful gigantic impressive carriers could sail without escort by the US Navy, as the Royal Navy is without the refuelling, anti-aircraft and anti-submarine vessels needed to escort them by itself. Did they get that right?

[@ultraman5168]

Sort of, kind of. There are some points there, but oversimplified or distorted. The Type 45 destroyers are some of the best anti-air vessels around, so that's flat wrong. The RN currently lacks quality anti-sub escorts beyond the remaining Type 23 frigates built in the 80s and 90s, but this is tempered by the high quality of the Astute-class subs and the QE's considerable helicopter complement, as well as the upcoming purchase of American P-8 patrol aircraft. Designs like the Type 26 and Type 32 vessels are due to fill this gap in fleet capability in the next 5 to 10 years. With refueling it is again a bit of an overstatement. The RN has one fleet tanker/resupply vessel, the Fort Victoria, but it is old and alone. There are also the four smaller Tide-class ships. And this is also slightly alleviated by the cargo moving of the QE's helicopter facilities. The RN intends to replace the Fort Victoria with up to three more modern ships of a similar size, with work starting in the next two years.

[@FireAngelOfLondon]

That's not correct, but it sort of resembles the truth. The Royal Navy has the destroyers and submarines needed (i.e. the combat ships), but it does not have enough F-35 fighters to operate them with a full strike group on board even one of the two. Also in some parts of the world the US Navy is providing refuelling and replenishment ships so they can resupply at sea when out of reach of friendly ports and Royal Navy resupply. The procurement of the F-35 is also very slow as there has been an agreement that Israel get their order first as they have the more urgent need, so we are currently getting only about 4(?) per year delivered from F-35 production. The current Queen Elizabeth air wing has Royal Navy F-35s and US Marine F-35s so that they can train together and make up a complete wing for one carrier group. The other ship in the class is operated as a helicopter assault carrier. Interestingly as well as having US Marine F-35b fighters operating from Queen Elizabeth there are Royal Navy F-35bs operating from US Navy ships, though I cannot recall which vessels. And as luck would have it I can't find my original source on that either. Anyone here know about that side of things?

[@noodles169]

It's a NATO deployment, not a British deployment. If it was a British deployment, then they would be all British ships. Other NATO ships sail with American, and French carrier's. When it comes to carriers, then the more friendly nations involved, the better

[@leemaguire4331]

You would think the Suez could be a very unsafe route for a battle grouping.

[@mohamedalaa4043]

Why?

[@iemjgf]

I do not understand about being safe in the Suez canal. This waterway is a lucrative source of income to Egypt and it is well protected. Also, how do you attack a warship that is actually moving in a stretch of water, fully armed with close range weapons? Scores of ships pass through every day, it is one of the most important water routes in the world.

[@mayajrj]

Why are no Union Jacks flying here?

[@bartley7953]

Its not in port ?

[@mayajrj]

@@bartley7953 NO they fly them at the back under sail and forward when in port. so that as they enter harbour people can see friend (see when at anchor in home port. Just wondered if it was protocol in the Suez Canal/

[@Autofleet4429]

The Union jack only flies in port/ special occasions, while at sea the White Ensign is flown from the main mast or other equivalent point on the ship.

[@bartley7953]

@@Autofleet4429 Yep . The Union Jack is not displayed while at sea or while entering or leaving port just the white ensign . It is displayed while alongside in port .

[@mayajrj]

@@Autofleet4429 Thank you :)

[@Av.Martin]

Reminds me of the battlefield 4 campaign at the end when you have to blow up a Chinese warship in the Suez Canal

[@josephlezano7691]

Wonderful video image of HMS Queen Elizabeth Aircraft Carrier passing through the Suez Canal and escorting Ship's . There has been a comment with an accompanying photograph on Twitter that HMS Queen Elizabeth got stuck there . The image includes , what is said is the Queen Elizabeth Aircraft Carrier being towed by the French Aircraft Carrier , Charles De Gaule . It is suggested by someone else that the image is Photo-Shopped . How much truth is there in this ? Did HMS Queen Elizabeth Aircraft Carrier Hull get stuck in the Suez Canal ? With Best Wishes. British Gibraltar UK Overseas Territory 🇬🇧.

[@timur_glazkov]

They're just photoshop for fun and giggles, all is fine!

[@photoisca7386]

Your gullibility threshold is set too high. Try reducing it or subscribe to "A Different Bias" as Davy Lynch does.

[@ahab9712]

No it didnt, its just banter between us and the french. We photohop their carrier aswell so jokes all round

[@georgebarnes8163]

The French carrier is not permitted in the Suez canal.

[@noodles169]

Come on bro. You can't be that gullible surely. If anything Elizabeth would be towing the French carrier

[@fubarmofo6969]

Uk ship with american made jets onboard a sight of power

[@andrelimbong4201]

HMS Queen Elizabeth: move out bitchezzz

[@TranceJedi]

Looking forward to it sinking !

[@alexandercarder2281]

It feels very ominous this does.

[@teacherwayne6680]

impressive