The “dramatic background music” drowns out the narrator on some platforms.
@watermann820011 ай бұрын
Stupid choice since we come here to hear about the "tech" not listen to canned music.
@tmseh11 ай бұрын
Needs Battlefield soundtrack.
@blabbergasted438011 ай бұрын
Music track overwhelming.
@jhatty634111 ай бұрын
Can't even hear him at some points in the video
@FelizTheLifeguardMinion311 ай бұрын
Yeah I had to crank it up to hear him and it totally drowns out 😂
@djr338611 ай бұрын
Background music is 🔥 but next time decrease the volume a bit. It will be helpful for hearing your narration. Superb editing Dark Tech team. 👍🏼👌
@anon_y_mousse11 ай бұрын
Definitely agreed there. It's a lot harder to hear the narration over that music.
@MrFlazz9911 ай бұрын
I was going to make a plea for moderation in the background music level, but then the very first comment I read was just such a plea. At least I know I'm not just a cantankerous deaf old fool!
@RogerEvans-oy2wj10 ай бұрын
Ditto!! (From an 83 year old Brit.) 😎👍🏼
@larsrystedt486511 ай бұрын
Music is so loud at times that it is quite difficult to hear you talk. :(
@baldieman6411 ай бұрын
Unusually for a "Dark" video, the music is so loud that I can barely make out what is being said.
@Couchienz11 ай бұрын
Being a flying wing doesn't automatically make it Stealthy, those engines with exposed turbine blades will make it stick like a sore thumb to radars.
@kurtr109011 ай бұрын
You’re right. Those canards on the wing tips would stand out as well. Though the fuel efficiency and range is very exciting.
@dianapennepacker685411 ай бұрын
I mean it still has a lower RCS compared to a conventional aircraft, but yeah. Now we just need airelonless designs using compressed air that he talked about in an other video with a BWB.
@KartSmarter11 ай бұрын
Maybe the Air Force should concern themselves with China instead of the climate
@dextermorgan111 ай бұрын
Lol
@s3p4kner11 ай бұрын
"You've stolen our dreams! Monster! How dare you!"
@DocWolph11 ай бұрын
The anticipated theater of operations around Taiwan and China necessitates longer range, ergo more sustainable, aircraft designs. "In lieu of [Competition], the greatest driver of innovation is [War]."
@marknunya310711 ай бұрын
bUt cHiNa oNlY wAnTS mOnEY
@joelrunyan16087 ай бұрын
Fuel efficiency IS a huge military advantage. Especially in aircraft. Huge. Range / weight.
@copester120411 ай бұрын
You might want to re-render this video. The 'background' music stomps on the narration in a few places.
@CivRev1011 ай бұрын
There is no "dwindling fossil fuel" issue. Just the unwillingness to extract coupled with the stupidity to not enhance nuclear power.
@warlock64c11 ай бұрын
I was actually gonna post some like this. Guyana is even in the news now because they just discovered a HUGE deposit and Venezuela wants a piece.
@TheGlobalTravelr11 ай бұрын
The general public is clueless to amount of oil located in Africa. It’s considered the next Middle East.
@walkingcarpet42011 ай бұрын
Same with the imaginary climate crisis, total nonsense
@floycewhite699111 ай бұрын
"Atoms for Peace" is political cover for atom bombs. It's so filthy and expensive only the biggest governments can subsidize it.
@rolsson169311 ай бұрын
Canada 🇨🇦 is a reservoir of oil, gas and LNG! Only problem is the political will on both sides of the border.
@calomanny11 ай бұрын
Music was too loud this time. Otherwise, same great video as always!
@MrDhalli650011 ай бұрын
DUDE THE MUSIC IS SO LOUD I HAVE TO TURN ON THE CAPTIONS TO READ WHAT I CAN'T HEAR. SWEET BABY JEBUS.
@Howard-nx2ip11 ай бұрын
The background music is so loud that I could barely hear the narrator.
@russsibbald370511 ай бұрын
As always a fascinating and well researched/presented video. One request is look at how the backing track drowns out the audio in places esp in the first couple of minutes. Outside of that adore your work
@TonyHilliardSedona11 ай бұрын
Yes the music is so loud it smothers the audio….
@tbarry499011 ай бұрын
Glad someone brought that up (audio track overpowered narration). And I also agree with the enjoyment of watching these videos.
@erickwilliams614711 ай бұрын
Bring the background music down a little bit.😂😂
@StEvEn-dp1ri11 ай бұрын
Dude the dramatic music was crazy loud. Juuuust a bit too dramatic ya know?
@ChrisShUK11 ай бұрын
No stupid red arrow on your thumbnail! Excellent, well done you guys
@johngeorgegately740211 ай бұрын
Background music overwhelms the narration. Remix in order.
@batterymooch11 ай бұрын
Interesting topic but the blaring background music ruins it all…unwatchable.
@informationcollectionpost325711 ай бұрын
Never knew a blended wing body had a shorter take-off and landing distance. It mysterious ly looks like the Boeing 797 concept. Two difficulties in creating a passenger airliner are its shape is difficult & difficult to calculate a pressurized fuselage and the width is so wide that it is hard to evacuate passengers from in the required FAA time limit. Boeing always kept it on the back burner as a cargo only jetliner. If the military decides in favor of it; then a cargo jetliner is going to come next. A blended winged passenger liner is some distance away from reality.
@willythemailboy211 ай бұрын
Yeah, the evacuation standard is a deal breaker. The surface to volume ratio is simply too low to mount the needed exits. As a cargo plane it has potential, especially since that would avoid the other deal breaker of having to rebuild every airport in the world.
@marusholilac11 ай бұрын
I know KZbin creators think that adding music enhances the production value. If it's balanced in volume I guess it's harmless, but in this video it's just a nuisance. BTW, there's no rule that you cannot edit and report a deficient video.
@ristube331910 ай бұрын
2:59 Anyone else have a flashback when Cmdr. Chakotay spoke of “Dreadnaught?!” I’m actually watching Voyager now 😂
@LostPlanet202411 ай бұрын
Yeah, I bet the enemy trembles in irrational fear in the knowledge that our newest aircraft is net zero….
@michalhaubner210411 ай бұрын
We could even hear the commentary, if it weren't for the unreasonably loud and epic music.
@sim.frischh978111 ай бұрын
PLEASE tell me you are not also starting with those clickbait thumbnails putting SciFi planes in where they have no business being! Your videos are good enough to not need that!
@dannythomson523911 ай бұрын
what is wrong with the sound? can barely hear the narration for the music.
@marsmotion11 ай бұрын
yeah cant hear you over the music way to well not helping is all ill say
@spectator330811 ай бұрын
I suggest you also analyze the work of Vincent Justus Burnelli, an American aerospace engineer, inventor and visionary. As far as BWB is concerned, SR-71, F-15, B-1, B-2, B-21, F-22 and even F-117 are various embodiements of this concept, although not optimized for fuel economy, but rather for speed/payload/stealth. Many X-planes also fit this description.
@mike448011 ай бұрын
Thanks for bringing this to our attention and explaining the concept behind it…
@joebago167911 ай бұрын
Lost me at climate crisis.
@Ecosse5711 ай бұрын
same here.
@generalrendar729011 ай бұрын
music isn't loud enough. I can still hear the dialogue.
@charlesblithfield618211 ай бұрын
Blended wing bodies will be a hard if not impossible sell in commercial passenger aviation because of the theatre style seating and lack of windows.
@williamzk908311 ай бұрын
The Junkers G38 of the 20s/30s had windows in the leading edge. Once big problem is that when these aircraft bank and if you are a passenger at the wing tip you will experience motion and maybe motion sickness.
@Trooper59911 ай бұрын
I like how youtube slapped a "Context" warning to your video, explaining climate change, just because you mentioned the word. These alarmists are getting more and more fragile by the day lol
@philipthomashinch-ki7cg11 ай бұрын
As usual music is too loud and you can't hear the commentary
@miker329811 ай бұрын
Brits invented the delta wing with embedded engines in the 1940's - Why mount the engines ABOVE a wing makes no sense for stealth The AVTO Vulcan bomber had the radar signature of a seagull.
@tmseh11 ай бұрын
Wayne Industries has takenn the lead on next generation airframes.
@JohnDarkDarkaisa11 ай бұрын
That background music made me think: "I should check the comments..."
@getinthespace771511 ай бұрын
The lifting body, blended wing with top mounted engines is very interesting. Would make it completely silent on approach wouldn't hear it until the aircraft has already passed.
@floycewhite699111 ай бұрын
Are you kidding? Sound travels out in every direction from its source. The only way you wouldn't hear it coming is if it were supersonic. Then you'd hear something! Besides, the sky has a roaring sound all day and into the evening from jet traffic.
@getinthespace771511 ай бұрын
@@floycewhite6991, lol. No. That's not even close to true. A vast majority of the energy and sound is directed out the back of a jet engine. You've never been to an airshow and seen a B2 fly by? You'll have a similar effect. You hear nothing until it goes by. The sound is largely blocked from body of the plane and directed up. NASA is currently looking to use this same technique to reduce the severity of sonic booms from supersonic aircraft. Leaving a smooth clean bottom and putting the engines on top of the aircraft shifts regions for shock wave formation to the top directing those Shockwaves up. An experiment for you... Stand in front of a wall and yell at it... Does the sound go through the wall or back at you making you feel wrong.
@MikeySan512711 ай бұрын
Agree that engine noise and exhaust noise will be mostly deflected upwards. Modern turbofan engines create a high velocity air flow around the exhaust that shrouds and contains most exhaust noise unless you are directly behind it. In a nose high attitude, those noise levels can still be a problem in climb out and landing.@@getinthespace7715
@floycewhite699111 ай бұрын
@@getinthespace7715 I suppose you forgot that, because of decades of government regulations, jet engines are designed to spread noise across the whole spectrum, and fool your ears into believing they're less noisy.
@oneshotme11 ай бұрын
I enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up
@jeromebarry174111 ай бұрын
The commercial passenger BWB concept suffers from having exceptionally long evacuation times during emergency. Until emergency evacuation times can get down to the tube and wing standard, the BWB will not be used for commercial passenger transport.
@treich123411 ай бұрын
Ditch the conflicting "music" please
@chris497311 ай бұрын
Sounds like an ideal tool moving into our totalitarian future
@sundragon770311 ай бұрын
Airline companies are not willing to sacrifice the number of available gates to accommodate the footprints of a BWB airliners. Many of the airports that these companies use cannot expand. The cities next to these ports have over the years have eventually engulfed these airports, thus restricting the expansion. It's also obvious that no airline company will willingly give up gates when there is a queue on the taxiway for gates. (It's about frequency, not just capacity/aircraft.)
@briangman33 ай бұрын
Make it for private jets first, smaller no problem with airports, more fuel efficiency means more range,
@joemattes838911 ай бұрын
The background audio on this one over powers.
@EagleFighterJet11 ай бұрын
great video
@patrickmilliken146311 ай бұрын
The audio mix doesn't work. Music overwhelms the narration. You need to remix your audio.
@greggweber996711 ай бұрын
Not just airports, but also building and assembling such wide "bodies" in an assembly building. I suspect that more assembly will be done at each station.
@ristube331910 ай бұрын
4:13 Looks about as close to the “Batwing” in the first Batman movie in 1989 as any real aircraft ever has (but with propellers obviously)
@pobybuf11 ай бұрын
What are the considerations given to help prevent air sickness? Is the angle of bank made when the plane is turning will be considerable? And you are off-center because you're no longer in the cylinder.😮
@ascherlafayette857211 ай бұрын
No it's basically the same
@kingdiesel6811 ай бұрын
What's the difference between a "lift body"design and this BWB? An for that matter the "flying wing" design!?!
@heathbruce992811 ай бұрын
Why wasn't the Northrop yb49 included here?
@gorethegreat11 ай бұрын
Background music is too loud. I can’t hear the narrator clearly. Please fix and stop ruining this channel.
@szabotnikseven602211 ай бұрын
why does the music have to be so loud that I can't hear what you are saying?
@comment876711 ай бұрын
"...escalating global temperatures?" DOPEY.
@lowandslow393911 ай бұрын
The soundtrack was so loud at times, I could not hear your voice well enough to comprehend what was being said.
@daveogarf11 ай бұрын
Music covers the narration in places. Great piece, though.
@jasonbailey370911 ай бұрын
Let's have low emission planes drop explosive devices
@bluewater45411 ай бұрын
OMG🙄 When I start hearing climate nonsense buzzwords like “sustainability” applied to our military I know it’s just a matter of time before we screw ourselves.
@joshweickum11 ай бұрын
That's a big ass airplane
@joshweickum11 ай бұрын
Judging by the schematic lol. 390' ha
@Mrgunsngear11 ай бұрын
🇺🇸
@jdogdarkness11 ай бұрын
Bra, the soundtrack is louder than the speaker...
@greggweber996711 ай бұрын
The Moonbat was improved upon.
@jonnyfatboy756311 ай бұрын
revolutionary.. the flying wing has been a staple part of the US air force for nearly 100 years! 😅
@Cluelesssomethinsomething11 ай бұрын
The music was a little too loud this time. But love your stuff!
@MetsanAsukas11 ай бұрын
The sound and background music production in this video is very harsh and poorly done. Love the channel just heads up. Seems unusual for you guys.
@snowness11011 ай бұрын
Please turn down the background music in post production. Around minute 3 I could not hear you over the music.
@RJDKHS9610 ай бұрын
Once again, the background music is too loud and over-powers the narration. Not sure why this continues to be an issue in your latest videos...just test ahead of time and get this resolved!
@6or7breadsticks11 ай бұрын
Music so loud i litterly cant hear you, please drop the music with nonfiction
@davidyoung963511 ай бұрын
Must agree music is killing the content.
@ristube331910 ай бұрын
4:53 When this was created, 20% fuel savings wasn’t as important as is today, fuel was cheap, now it’s absolutely not.
@danielsundberg197711 ай бұрын
"Background " music made it near impossible to hear the narrator!
@Walter-wo5sz11 ай бұрын
We) yeah, it's 200 billion dollars but it gets great mileage.
@stickplayer211 ай бұрын
The background music keeps overriding the voiceover, making parts of this too annoying to watch.
@alex326111 ай бұрын
Just fit a couple of Tesla Model S onthem and you fixed theproblem Ad solarpanels and you transform the"solar power into combat power" as a famous VP said a while ago
@paktahn11 ай бұрын
one of the biggest things that holds back technological innovation in modern products is that producers have to take into account the added cost to the consumer to change existing infrastructure to be compatible with the new developed tech in regards to this vid that would be the required changes to actual airports lick boarding gate redesign manufacturers know that airline companies wont want a plane that can not dock using the dame boarding gates that all other passenger aircraft use because this would limit them to only flying to new airports or those willing to spend the money to upgrade to accommodate the aircraft this wouldnt be a big deal if there was only one airline company and they owned all airports in the world but that isnt the case and all airports would need to agree to an across the board upgrade weather it be with or without financial help from airline companies this is the main reason large passenger jet evolution has stagnated for over half a century their form has remained unchanged for well over 70 years even though military aircraft have been consistently evolving in form to keep pace with new technological developments i doubt without governmental regulation and international agreements to force the adoption of this tech that we will see its widespread implementation and its full benefits in our lifetime
@milnez11 ай бұрын
Cool content, but that volume on the backing track is a bit much…
@christopherparisho584411 ай бұрын
Sometimes the music you choose drowns out the voiceover.
@Will-W11 ай бұрын
Good grief, I'm not willing to turn the volume off and watch with subtitles.
@MrTomcatt31011 ай бұрын
Nice topic however the audio mixing is off as the ambient track is far too loud - unbareable i'm afraid
@bigfoot904911 ай бұрын
Any maintenance on this thing will cost astronomical numbers
@kirkthiets277111 ай бұрын
I know they’re perfecting the rotating detonation jet engine. I want to see what the future birds look like that can go Mach 5 or more.
@floycewhite699111 ай бұрын
Trixie's helicopter.
@Couchienz11 ай бұрын
Until they can come up with the materials that can take the heat of hypersonic flight over a long period we may be waiting a while. Its ok for missiles that only have to fly once and only for an hour at most, but a reusable aircraft is much harder.
@hansfreivogel241911 ай бұрын
Could that bird become the first ever environmentally friendly aircraft that can drop nukes???? What will they think of next?
@dellingson483311 ай бұрын
There is no dwindling of fossil fuels. And yes i believe in climate cycles.
@johnjarrett331111 ай бұрын
You had me up to the climate shilling
@lordvalentine47110 ай бұрын
The Air Force is in the lead in Cutting Edge technology and also in wasting large sums of money
@MAGAman-uy7wh11 ай бұрын
Ditto to @mike4480 and a question. Why isn't vectored thrust envisioned for the military models? Commercial aircraft would not need it but the military versions might benefit greatly from thrust vectoring for increased maneuverability.
@PoorlyPlaying11 ай бұрын
I’m assuming the model we see in the video is only really meant to be a larger aircraft for things like cargo transport/fueling, electronic warfare, early warning radar, etc. Those planes don’t really need to maneuver super hard, and even if they did it would likely overload the wings. Those things are super thin, and I have a hard time imaging they’d hold up too well in high G maneuvers.
@derekaldrich33011 ай бұрын
Interesting thought, but the weight and wasted energy compromises for thrust vectoring would negate the aerodynamic advantages of a BWB or flying wing. Also something to consider, BWB and flying wings are inherently unstable around the vertical axis, and thrust vectoring would exacerbate that on a platform where stability is desired, unlike fighter aircraft.
@theSpicyHam11 ай бұрын
fascinating display of techs, though we can see it, so it's there and not stealthed exactly!?
@guyh.455311 ай бұрын
Turn down the "background" music. It's drowning you out
@similodonofindy774111 ай бұрын
Please turn up the back ground music, I could almost hear the narrator! Lol
@ryanhall987711 ай бұрын
Music is WAY too loud
@will_uxo11 ай бұрын
Can’t make out the commentary over the music!
@ajm287211 ай бұрын
Lower the music volume, dude.
@spud360711 ай бұрын
Got to 3.20, gave up because I cant tell what the narrator was saying, music was to loud.
@RedSinter11 ай бұрын
The already proven eco fuels by the military would slash that use not just for them but the average citizen. The rearchitectering of airports is a jobs program as well where Co2 reduction in materials would also help the climate issues.
@jdogi111 ай бұрын
Anybody else feel like the audio engineer accidentally put the speaking track as the background and the music/effect track at the forefront? I've watched a bunch of the channel's videos over the years and don't recall being annoyed like this on the others.
@kaesardb11 ай бұрын
Stop the thumbnail clickbait.
@petehafner384411 ай бұрын
Too loud background music
@oldmanfromscenetwentyfour816411 ай бұрын
Music is a bit too loud.
@InquisitiveBaldMan11 ай бұрын
Dont they have a larger cross sectional area when compared to a flying pencil with the maximum aspect ratio? Surely a maximum stretch of a fuselage is the best way to improve efficiency in relation to drag. I only see this as relevant in planes that have to be small, maybe a c130 replacement or smaller. Maybe not even that big. Its the reason they say the celera 500l is only scalable up to a certain size, i thought.
@lotuselanplus2s11 ай бұрын
you forgot the Horton 229.
@derekaldrich33011 ай бұрын
A mere oversight, I'm sure. I'll fill in the blanks. A revolutionary aircraft of which only one was completed that killed its test pilot on the third flight. Some consider it to be the first "stealth" aircraft, but any reduction in RCS was accidental and mostly to do with being a flying wing. Beautiful to look at but poorly engeneered. The Horten brothers fled to Argentina near VE Day and spent the rest of their lives trying to convince anyone who would listen to invest in their continued work towards a supersonic flying wing, which is as ludicrous as it sounds.