US Army's NEW IHPS Helmet vs Russian 7N21-1

#IHPS #7n21-1 #helmet
It did not do well
Basic test data: docs.google.co...
Flag Range Operator my ammo source found here: / logic8368
linktr.ee/Oxid...

[@Oxide_does_his_best]

Thanks to: elementrange.com/ in Holt Florida for helping me with test site and other stuff! FPS of the 7n21-1 was 1400 out of the vityaz. So it was going a little slower than it should to my understanding

[@parkermclane6904]

I love you @Oxide

[@RavenWolffe77]

What was the song in that last 10sec? I swear I've heard it before...

[@toska3528]

@@RavenWolffe77 kzbin.info/www/bejne/emTXf2R4rc-mnbc

[@ash_1419]

@@RavenWolffe77 Death Stranding music it is, Asylum for the feelings.

[@masterPnut1]

The fact I used to live 5 minutes away from element then a month later finding this is pretty jarring. Never went unfortunately but always heard good things about element. Great video btw!

[@Taskandpurpose]

Awesome video ! I wasn’t aware of the IHIPS performance issues , thanks for running the tests , were all a little smarter now . Hooah?

[@Oxide_does_his_best]

For sure! I tried to message you about the intro I really was worried about making you look dumb. I carefully chose those clips.

[@Taskandpurpose]

@@Oxide_does_his_best no worries I like it, nobody can make me look dumb I do that all on my own haha

[@totalfailforfun4721]

Yoooo

[@ACE_VIPER]

@@Taskandpurpose Thats why we love you

[@FlatRangeOperator]

Italian stallion has entered the chat

[@TheTacticalChannel]

Besides the protection issue, the helmet just sucks. Got issued one via RFI and I still prefer the ACH. The IHPS has brittle plastic on it that breaks all the time, the NVG mount is out of spec and requires a ton of tape to stop ratting. Additionally with even just a pvs14 mounted it becomes super unbalanced and the strap adjustment is garbage. Why the army didn't just adopt a 3M highcut is beyond me, but it probably has something to do with some field grade's OER.

[@ishara9813]

Corruption is a wonderfull things

[@EricKremer]

I think the issue is with your out dated nvgs my dude. I rock the an pvs6s which are dual tube with a double battery pack and I think it’s much more balanced and stable with the new helmet. I do agree that they should’ve just went with a highcut from opscore or 3m, but some general somewhere is thinking he made the right decision. At least the plate carrier we got is actually decent.

[@bwilk6372]

Yeah, its no longer jump rated either, so its a pile of dookie

[@loganwc99]

I only like it because it’s lighter. 😂

[@johnmascia7612]

@@EricKremer the plate carrier is trash as well. Its cool you can take weight of for pt events though.

[@man1699]

I guess they were going for "no penetration" is all that matters.

[@cagneybillingsley2165]

garand thumb just did his usual shilling for the newest hardware

[@jeffmatt6283]

This is what NIJ armour protection levels are all about. A way to compare products not so much to be reliable. If we look for a product that is actually superior, we either ask for NIJ+VPAM combination or we look for "DOJ" standard. If we look at NIJ testing requirements for helmets we understand that it does not make any sense regarding saving your head, right? :)

[@DreadPirateRoberts121]

I find it odd that Big army wants to improve its ballistic capabilities with the new 6.8 rifles with its borderline outrageous spec requirements but does a complete 180 with body armor and gives little thought in the Gen 1 helmet

[@claytonmachine12]

Because these get approved for limited adoption for testing purposes, just like all 3 entries of the NSGW. And people then go out and say "look, its the new standard issue thing because the army said it was testing it." Testing for armor is different than rifles because we are testing the material, not a companies design. Its why if you look at the makers mark for military helmets you can find multiple logos within the same gen of helmet. We adopted these for testing, and we concluding it had issues. which is why you never saw these helmets in a front line unit ANYWAY. Hell you can find a dozen different variations of this style helmet, mandible, and applique armor, all of which "were the Army's Next Gen combat helmet" that never saw mass issue. ALLLLL the way back to the early 00s Future soldier program. We issue them to a unit, because then we can get end user experience, in conjunction with further ballistic testing. Which helps the DOD/Army/Navy/Marines/AF/ determine if there is some merit to furthering development to try and make a product that failed work, or just move on to the next.

[@thr0waway]

@@claytonmachine12 It's millions of dollars of R&D, years of work, all to produce a really shitty helmet. It's a failure. Basic ballistic tests expose these helmets as garbage, they never should've made it this far in the first place.

[@03c12]

@@claytonmachine12 I mean, with the IHPS yes. The NGSW trial is no longer a 3 weapon trial though, the Army did in fact decide they would be doing an initial issue of the Sig XM5 and XM250. These will be going to the close combat force at first and then there will probably be some changes and re-issue before ending up as a regularly issued rifle and MG.

[@claytonmachine12]

@@03c12 which is how weapons trials always go. From here the Army chooses if it's gonna be limited adoption or fullscale. And considering the amount of fuckery suround the rifle trial everyone's pretty sure it's not gonna see full scale adoption

[@03c12]

@@claytonmachine12 I personally think it will make it after a few changes. InRangeTV did a good video on it and the main coolant is weight but I've never known the Army to genuinely care about how much something weighs lol

[@sections5068]

Fastest click in the west

[@blitzgewehr1820]

These were nice on my deployment, but I had doubts of its protection. Another cool feature of this helmet is when you jump with them, the plastic chinstrap retainers on the helmet snap easily making these almost unusable in Airborne operations.

[@serronserron1320]

One might almost miss those WW1 leather and tin helmets.

[@Nimbus64]

I still just use the ACH on jumps lol

[@toml9736]

Im not in the army but how often would you be shot at from point blank range unless it’s infantry? Its a real question bc most the videos iv watched on KZbin seems like a good distance away if that’s true then it doesnt do bad for point blank range

[@serronserron1320]

@@toml9736 It depends on the battlefield I suppose. According to one study most urban engagements happened with in 15 yd

[@toml9736]

@@serronserron1320 well i guess if this helmet is for more modern use we really aren’t in the flat dessert anymore so if we did go to war with russia or china then it would be more close range bc of the urban environments then it is a bad design i see what you’re saying. It would have done well in the Middle East bc that’s mostly the videos i seen and it was like what are they even shooting at i cant see lol. But i mean thats a lot of damage from a pistol round shooting shooting that’s supposed to be rated for rifles

[@_lime.]

The add-on rifle armor tells me everything I need to know about this helmet. I work in procurement for the government (not the U.S. but the same shit applies everywhere). It's super easy to sell something like this to the decision makers. You just says something like "It's lighter than a kevlar helmet, and with the add-on armor it's got better defensive capabilities." which is true. What this fails to mention is that it's only lighter without the armor and is less defensive in that case, and with the armor on it's heavier and bulkier. This helmet really hasn't solved any problems. I saw the same shit happen on a ship. There was a hard weight limit that could not be passed and a shit load of mission equipment that needed to be added to allow it to fill all the roles they wanted. Add all the equipment and the ship is too heavy. Solution? Mount all the equipment in removable containers on the deck. As registered the ship meets the weight limits but operationally it has all the equipment it needs. In this case it was more of rules lawyering type thing as the limit was due to some legal agreements but the idea is the same.

[@acceptablecasualty5319]

"Modularity" is the Word of the Day. "Oh no, our system totally meets requirements, it can be anything you want it to be!" Says the huge Company that gets the Contract, meanwhile two engineers in a shed could come up with a better solution, than what rushed Design by committee accomplished in the same time.

[@devincooper8739]

Yep I'll stick with my ACH, that performance shows that whoever was involved in all the testing to get this helmet adopted wanted money not improved safety.

[@wigon]

I'll stick with my M1 steel pot + ballistic nylon liner. That performs better than this piece of garbage. Plus you can use the steel helmet as a water basin to shave with. :P

[@cameronsams9183]

@@wigon I'll stick with 13,000 pieces of paper to stop a 50.cal

[@tuongtran4862]

@@cameronsams9183 I’ll stick with the Mjolnor Mk 5 armor suit. It’s bulletproof if you make sure your energy shield is charged up and you don’t take a .50 to the head

[@FlatRangeOperator]

SUP glad you got to utilize those 9mm. I will have DU 308 and 7n37 enroute soon.

[@Oxide_does_his_best]

I’ll phone you later

[@FlatRangeOperator]

@@Oxide_does_his_best Roger

[@oldman8996]

Wait you have DU rifle rounds... *tell me more*

[@fractalryft6143]

Fantastic new vid, a shame the IHPS had awfully similar poor performance to the 6B47, but I can't say I'm surprised. At least it still stops fragmentation... But that's a pretty low bar to be fair.

[@Seth9809]

If this helmet is made from better materials, why is it so much shit? They cut too many corners? Helmet is too light?

[@fredd9340]

@@Seth9809 As Oxide said, it's good at stopping penetration but it's shit at minimizing deformation, so from what we can tell the material combo was not a good choice

[@Seth9809]

@@fredd9340 Thats bullshit if you are talking about UHMWPE. Kevlar helmets cave in when hit with high energy and the ECH/Opscore did not give a shit.

[@jerryle379]

@@Seth9809 you need to think like the general , american future enemy are china , war with them is just matter of time , lighter weight = better in a war vs the Chinese , the helmet just need to protect again fragment , as majority of kill in war vs near pier will not be from enemy gun and bullet but from arty shelling , bomb , drone strike , missile strike , atgm , that why the Chinese also didn't invest much in they helmet same for Russian they just made it light , have rail to mount stuff and enough protection again fragment and hand gun round .

[@IEATU95]

@@jerryle379 I hope we don't go to war with China, I have many friends from China and I am in the US. We should all just chill man.

[@24YOA]

Ah yes the Next Generation IHPS THE NIGAHIPS

[@garynew9637]

Haha

[@RangerColinLZ]

In a world where the Ops Core FAST RF1 helmet exists, and is supposedly rated for 7.62x39 threats, why switch to something inferior? Also a FAST RF1 test would be neat. See if it could stop some of these more "exotic" threats.

[@fredcollins8919]

US & NATO ARE going to OpsCore helmets esp over past 5+ years esp in active duty Infantry units. Not sure who this new (& hopefully very temporary helmet) will be for

[@hondaservicecenter]

​@@TwizzElishus yeah people dont realize the effect that straight kinetic energy has.... bro people die from getting punched in the head so imagine hulk punching you in the head 😂

[@Fulcrox]

FAST helmets have an issue called null side protection

[@oldgrunt5806]

Just an old grunt from the days of steel pots and iron sights. The question I have about a helmet that will stop rifle rounds without deformation is, that energy has to go somewhere. Even if it works will you survive, best case be combat effective. How much weight will it have? Is it really worth it?

[@TrollMeister-s6n]

Please do a vid on the newest US military helmet, the camo dog kink mask...

[@ChickEd1]

Хороший видос, спасибо Oxide! У нас в России уже есть пара таких шлемов, сделаны хорошо, но стоит все таки проговорить пару аспектов: 1) 6Б47 - это исключительно противоосколочный шлем, в нашей классификации имеет самый низкий класс бронезащиты. Почему так сделано? В боевых операциях, когда у противника есть артиллерия, авиация и т.д., личный состав в основном несет потери именно от осколочных ранений, либо от пуль рикошетирующих/на излете, нежели от прямого выстрела. Касательно габаритов 6Б47, он сделан на размер больше, для минимизации запреградной травмы, т.е. M размер это L, L размер это XL у ACH. Поэтому взяв во внимание эти моменты, можно сказать, что IHPS, это задел на будущее,что по мысли создателей, американский солдат, с винтовкой M5 будет вести прицельную стрельбу (и в случае чего, получать в обратку) 2) Второй аспект заключается в том, что на сколько мне известно, в Американском стандарте защиты нет понятия запреградная травма, есть поставленная цель, что пуля либо пробила, либо нет, в отличие от американских стандартов, наши общевойсковые бронежилеты оснащаются КАПами(демпферами) и значительно гасят и распределяют ту оставшуюся энергию пули при попадании в бронеплиту. В Американских армейских жилетах, функцию КАП частично берет на себя слой кевлара, но очевидно, что для разных калибров и дистанций этого будет мало. 3) Поэтому, собрав всю мою супер умную мысль (нет) можно сделать вывод, что бронезащита у нас, строится из нескольких элементов и под другие задачи (поэтому Вам не особо понравился отстрел 6Б47, он попросту не предназначен для этого), Американская система бронезащиты строится на основании другого опыта и видения будущих войн, поэтому такие заделы по бронезащите. Хорошо это, или плохо - покажет время, но самое главное, что работы ведутся и это однозначно хорошо.

[@rinaldoman3331]

Не забываем что фишка 6Б47 в его малом весе, а значит возможностью носить длительное время что для солдата очень важно. С другой стороны по защите он уступает даже советской каске СШ-68 бородатых годов, которая совсем немного отличается от СШ-40 времен ВОВ.

[@ChickEd1]

@@rinaldoman3331 Про "уступает" в бронезащите, по сравнению с стальными шлемами - это ,конечно, сильное заявление

[@TacticalHandleGaming]

Wow, that is seriously concerning to see.

[@eriksemelson409]

Good to see people understand that such deformation is deadly. Thats why i wasn't too impressed with the ECH that Mikeb tested, yes it did stop 7.62x51, yes great, but the deformation already on the 9mm would have done real damage if not killed. So in the end on a battlefield, frag that an ACH could catch with minimal deform, the ECH could have the users skull caved in.

[@Oxide_does_his_best]

I need to test the ECH...

[@hasselnttper3730]

I agree. Maybe they test helmets with a simulated skull on the inside? Can't deform as much if there's no space.

[@KoishiVibin]

@@Oxide_does_his_best By the by, what happened to the pads and liner? Aren't those supposed to be a part of the helmet?

[@Oxide_does_his_best]

This is sorta what I noticed too. But the ECH has its advantages. Video soon

[@randypurtteman1183]

I spen nearly 22 years in they military. Shortly before my initial retirement we were issued the "new" kelvar helmets to replace our ols steel pots that were issue since WWII. There was certainly some resentment in the beginning. Then Iwas recalled for Kuwait and got to experience the new helmet in actual combat. Although there were some things it was not as useful for (such as bathing and heatin water) in combat it was far more useful in its intended roll. Especially when it came to fragmentation. I sincerely hope that before the military issues it's replacement Army wide they discover a helment that will resist small arms penitration to the point os solving deadly head injuries and deaths. Otherwise I pray that the military industrial complex resits the temptation to purchase something because its new and shiny.

[@BuffRANGE]

Does Moose have any interest in adding my data from ESAPi, and upcoming XSAPI, LTC, and GOST armor to his sheeT?

[@Oxide_does_his_best]

YES, I'll ask him about it

[@NunyaBesnas]

“Decision making” did you mean “political influence”?

[@zlo333]

u can't get russian helmets on ebay, they d be chinese knock offs, originals are baned

[@cnlbenmc]

I liked that C&C Generals USA soundtrack in the beginning, made me think I was watching Spookston for a split second.

[@lazkivalle9577]

What a gane :c

[@thelieutenant7732]

I’m real excited for the PLA armor video, I don’t think I’ve seen it tested before, probably because they didn’t start issuing armor on a wide scale until 2015

[@xxxxxx5868]

And even then, PLA is so corrupt that commanders just straight up sell the body armor that their soldiers are supposed to recieve to the black market lmao. Same as Russian commanders straight up selling tank reactive armor plates.

[@thelieutenant7732]

@@xxxxxx5868 Really? I had never heard of this, where'd you find that out? Corruption in military supply chains is such an interesting topic.

[@xxxxxx5868]

@@thelieutenant7732 I remember there was a journalist who went over and interviewed a Chinese soldier and he basically said they were supposed to recieve body armor a few years ago but their commander keeps taking the shipments and sells them. Of course they can't do anything about it because of their rank. It's pretty much like during the early 2000s where Russian commanders would take off the reactive armor plates from tanks and sell them off. A lot of things in China are all talk no bite. Everytime a westerner talks about how advanced China is and how much better it is then America I laugh. I've been to China and the place is depressing. I'm Indonesian, China is actively trying to take over Asia and Southeast Asia and it sucks to see everyone fall for China's intimidation. Especially our neighbour the Philliphenes who just elected a president who's being such a push over for China.

[@thelieutenant7732]

@@xxxxxx5868 It's really funny that you say that since a lot of American's I know went to China expecting it to be the same as the Maoist era only to be blown away by the new skyscrapers and heavy capitalist influence. I've never been so I can't say much from personal experience, but China has definitely advanced. If it can compete with the US and surpass us in pure statistical data (not just militarily), then they're doing something right.

[@xxxxxx5868]

@@thelieutenant7732 Yes new skyscrapers in Shanghai or Beijing where all the tourists and rich people live, then you go outside of tourist area.... but I really couldn't give a damn about how advanced they are. The CCP and Xi Jinping is the devil. Take it from someone who actually lives in Asia and the South China sea.

[@MikeB128]

Hey, it's me at 1:00 . Good video.

[@Oxide_does_his_best]

Love your vids Mike, do you want a proper credit? I wanted to ask, do you remember what type of 762 you hit the ECH with?

[@MikeB128]

@@Oxide_does_his_best It's all good man I'm not mad, but sure if you want to. I was using Tulammo or something like it. 123 GR FMJ, so the lead core may have been a factor, but still, It was pretty impressive to us. Again, great video.

[@NUCL3ARTAC0S]

Got issued an IHPS in April (by itself, no face visor or appilque shell) and the only thing it seems to improve over the ACH is that it is more comfortable to wear a Peltor Comtac headset underneath it. The Army should've gotten with the program and followed in the Marine Corps footsteps (who allegedly receives worse equipment than the Army) and adopted the high cut ECH.

[@matthewtaylor3301]

When I joined the Marine Corps I fully expected some serious hand-me-down crap. I got out in 2017, but I will say the gear I was issued wasn't terrible. We were an infantry batallion and I was pleasantly surprised. Marine Corps has been putting some money into it's grunts over the past decade or so.

[@nvgboiyes6386]

Hey ox I think you forgot to add the audio for the army ad it doesn’t take a genius scene but other than that great insight to the army’s helmet and it shows that they really messed up. This helmet seems useless as they don’t really issue the neat attachments and the ballistic protection is bad. Reminds me of Russia’s ak12 where they add pic rails but they don’t issue good attachments and the new features are useless and even makes the gun worse.

[@Oxide_does_his_best]

I was going to voice over that line, but I figured I didn't have to because people that know would immediately understand

[@nvgboiyes6386]

@@Oxide_does_his_best makes sense those army ads gotten a lot of peoples attention all for the wrong reasons.

[@DocPeabody337]

Great video per usual! Frustrating to see the Army adopt this helmet before letting it actually live up to expectations. Though from what you said, I'm getting similar vibes as with other military projects like the Osprey or F35, where it needs some more iterations/development before reaching true expectations, or even exceeding them. Fingers crossed they can get this sorted for the better.

[@DocPeabody337]

@Random Pickle Oh I'm aware. It is now, after 10+ years of development, budget mismanagement, and setbacks. Do not take this as a criticism, more of an acknowledgment of how these things work in our wonderful and flawed bureaucracy. Thus I make the comparison, that they will continue to iterate, as was alluded to in the video, and improve, as they did with other military programs who initial fruits were rotten and unwanted. Such as it were, I am hopeful that our troops will get the helmets they need in time for when they need them.

[@nobstompah4850]

@Random Pickle he's not wrong tho, it did take a LOT of iterations before we got what we have today, and some of those earlier models even went into service

[@prfwrx2497]

It's funny, cuz Ceradyne makes both IHPS and ECH. The former is trash, the latter kicks ass.

[@lardthing7417]

Due to the fact that they're already making the Next Gen IHPS, the problems surrounding the helmet will likely be alleviated a lot sooner compared to the other projects that you mentioned... Either that, or I'm just coping.

[@DocPeabody337]

@@lardthing7417 Fingers crossed!

[@DwayneHicks323]

Hey oxide if I was able to get hold of a buckshee virtus helmet (it's the British body armour and helmet) would you be interested in testing it's protective abilities I'll try include a mandible and visor though there not ballistic rated for some reason we use them in public order (riot training) pretty sure a brick would break the mandible.

[@Oxide_does_his_best]

Gimme one

[@Seth9809]

Email him. He gave his email in one of the early helmet testing videos.

[@Oxide_does_his_best]

@@Seth9809 it’s on my about page

[@Kav.]

@@Oxide_does_his_best what's the law on importing helmets to USA? I'd love to see a MK6 helmet test, to see how it compares to other vintage helmets.

[@wigon]

@@Kav. You can import them. No laws against importing body armor as far as I know unless your state prohibits body armor. Only exporting U.S. body armor is where you can get into trouble.

[@gammainc1666]

As a combat medic, looking at that deformation makes me cringe... definitely enough force to at minimum cause a subdural or epidural hematoma, which greatly complicates treatment especially in the field. There's a lot of fluids I wouldn't be able to push because of increased intercranial pressure, as well as a lot of medications- not to mention dealing with a patient who has a TBI is just... not fun. You gotta work your ass off to make sure that, at the least, they don't die.

[@maneakihizkiaarvid6132]

Marine keep winning these days High cut ECH is better in almost every aspect

[@maneakihizkiaarvid6132]

Also do Ukrainian uarm ballistic helmet and plate test if you can I want to see how it compare to the Russian counterpart

[@Seth9809]

ECH is full baller.

[@Sam21721]

Tfw for once the Marin Crops has better gear than the Army with their ECH

[@YukarisGearReviews]

Army has the ECH too

[@fictionalchannel]

Would be incredibly interesting to see a team up with the slo-mo guys to see the damage made on the helmets by the bullets!

[@orlock20]

I want to see some sort of CTE or brain bleed test. The shock of the bullet is going to travel through the helmet, through the skull and slush the brain around like scrambling eggs. Spectators have died from brain bleed after getting hit by hockey pucks even though there was no outside damage to their head. A bullet is going to produce far more of a shock wave than a hockey puck.

[@KjKase]

Yeah with a shot on both the inside and outside or something if you had the helmet in a braced stand

[@Pez888888]

Command and Conquer Generals music? Hell yeah!

[@SoldierO7]

A fellow man of culture!

[@davidwangwang6]

@@SoldierO7 Prepare to tell your three-eyed grandchildren of your defeat this day!

[@theshadowrunner28]

Great stuff man. I'll stick to an ACH/ECH for now 😬

[@Vagabond671]

"Let's just push the darn thing out. We'll worry about the ballistic protection later." - the Army basically Also, much love from the island of Guam! Keep up the great work!

[@sapperbean5791]

The fact the Army okay'd this is not surprising.

[@redfordbrownless6486]

Love the command and conquer generals background music❤️😂 might have to start playing that again

[@1KosovoJeSrbija1]

don't worry, the marine just lost his brain, he'll be fine

[@Halal_Dan]

Will you do a test on the ECH?

[@Oxide_does_his_best]

Yes!

[@tirushone6446]

7n21-1? chese body amour? Next time: "So I got my hands on a good condition t-90 mbt, I figured I would test it's amour using my m256A1 smooth bore cannon. I will be firing DM33 APFSDS at a range of 1000 meters."

[@Stefan-xu5nd]

Don't join Oxide discord server,biggest mistake of my life

[@Gadtkaz]

The russians have the cope cage, the americans now have the cope cap.

[@eddiebernays514]

the only thinking in buying gear is "how much money will i make from the deal?"

[@eddiebernays514]

how was your basic training???

[@counterfeit6089]

It's ugly as shit and not enough better than the ACH/ECH to warrant its existence. Looks like some generic "futuristic" airsoft helmet you'd find on aliexpress for $25

[@connerknoth1563]

I'm not meaning to defend the helmet, I'm not invested in this particular helmet. That said, I question the reliability of a test on the helmet without a dummy head inside. If someone was actually wearing the helmet, their head and neck would be able to absorb much of the energy of the bullet - energy that, without a head inside, goes into deforming the material of the helmet. I happen to know a lot of Vicis employees and have attended many seminars about their work and it seems clear to me that testing a helmet without a head inside is a recipe for wildly inaccurate results. I know this would be expensive, but for future tests, I recommend a dummy head with accelerators inside for a better picture of how protective each helmet really is. I also recommend researching the methods with which helmets are tested in various industries.

[@orlock20]

Spectators have died from bleeding inside the brain after getting his by hockey pucks even though there was no outside damage to their head. A bullet is going to make a larger shock wave than a hockey puck. CTE is a real problem that would happen even if a helmet was able to stop a bullet without deformation.

[@Cyrribrae]

@@orlock20 That's why he recommended attaching accelerometers inside the helmet, to test the force of the shock wave.

[@trofchik9488]

The results are very similar to Mike B's ECH tests. Polyethylene helmets are good at stopping round but they deform terribly while doing so.

[@tigerfang6063]

They should have polyethylene composite outershells with kevlar inner shell, or vice versa, whichever way causes the least deformation

[@trofchik9488]

@@tigerfang6063 Yeah. I though of some kind of inner shell that prevents deformation as well.

[@pco5267]

The ECH outperformed this though, but it does so at the cost of weight without the modularity. There's a reason that they are making ECH's in midcut/high cut now

[@drakealex]

Stumbled upon this channel eating breakfast, i can say that your systematic way of testing, live demonstration that is straight to the result is great, in a sphere of over edited content. I do appreciate the honesty when it comes to it is a small sample size, subbed.

[@oriontheraptor8119]

It stops the bullet but still shatters your skull….top quality

[@moistjohn]

The most ok helmet for the price of a top tier helmet. Very cool army, epic. Definetly not graft.

[@ward9837]

$$$$$$$ :/

[@jonahc2807]

My expectations were low but holy fuck

[@braiden408]

If you’re getting shot from 5 meters by an armor piercing round you have bigger problems than how much your helmet can stop.

[@unboppable1702]

It's a pistol round. If you are getting shot at with pistols then you have less problems than literarly any soldier ever.

[@nicomariconi1005]

I love the c&c generals soundtrack

[@defenestrationismyfavoriteword]

here's hoping NG IHPS fares much better. I feel like a lot of people see everything new with teething issues and use that as an excuse to remain completely static and complacent, often even ignoring the original teething issues of the stuff they already have.

[@FR4NCH3K]

Yeah that being said the IHPS’s inability to be jumped and extreme BFD with standard 9mm loads aren’t “teething issues” they’re glaring design errors.

[@defenestrationismyfavoriteword]

@@FR4NCH3K i havent seen many helmet tests to compare this with but yeah, i'm inclined to agree

[@geronimo5537]

Im so glad I hated the new pedal bike helmets of the military. I'm now totally justified for calling them shit. Mere frag protection...May as well use a ww2 helmet. It's only design intention I liked was the ability to wear ear protection with the helmet. But it failed as its intended job of protecting my dome. So its trash compared to older designs.

[@spetsnaz892]

Hating on the 6b47, but there's plenty of videos of it saving soldiers shot near point blank with rifle rounds in Ukraine

[@Oxide_does_his_best]

You’re an idiot

[@spetsnaz892]

@Oxide Lmao okay? we're playing that game? And you're forever going to have that annoyingly nasal voice that makes it sounds like you should be playing DND

[@spetsnaz892]

@Frankthetank123098 Big difference between a glancing shot, and a shot that knocks the soldier unconscious, only to get up a few moments later

[@ZumbieGuy]

I’ve been issued the helmet and I have to say, I don’t very much like it. It weighs just the same as my old ACH if not heavier, and wearing PELTORs is only a little more comfier than the ACH. I do like the chin strap system but there’s far better helmets that are more comfortable and more light that offer better protections(coughcough3MHighcutscoughcough)

[@nic12344]

You CAN NOT test modern ballistic helmets without a head (or head analogue) inside! They are designed to spread the impact to a large area of the head to minimize trauma. With a head inside, you'd have way less deformation. I'm not saying this particular helmet is any good, only that your test is bad...

[@orlock20]

Also there should be something to simulate CTE. Bleeding in the brain could still happen even though the outside of the head looks fine. CTE has killed boxers and hockey spectators hit by hockey pucks.

[@thomasstevenhebert]

@@orlock20 any soldier taking a round to the dome with will get an evaluation and CTE screening at the first opportunity.

[@WhiteSuperMemeist]

I've literally been issued this helmet and it's on my clothing record, I wear it to the field regularly. It's very comfortable. Most people that have them now were issued them through RFI when we might have went to Afghanistan back a few months ago and when we got sent to Poland recently.

[@sharp5854]

As long as it’s more comfy than an ACH I’ll take a headshot as a trade off 😂

[@WhiteSuperMemeist]

@@sharp5854 miles more comfy and lighter.

[@fredcollins8919]

question for you, sir. What about the many active duty Infantry units already being issued & using (for past several years) the new, lightweight compact OPSCore helmet now common in both US military & most NATO infantry forces + in many other Non-NATO militaries (including piss poor nations in my region (LAtin America)????? Hope youve seen them around often & that they are now more integrated/used by more & more active duty US Infantry units. The older helmets shouldve been ditched 20+ years ago, (All branches). Compact, lightweight gear, HELMETS, NVGs, weapons & boots IS (& has been & shall remain) the GLOBAL military trend and we (USA) MUST be leading the way in this race for the best. Comments, observations, suggestions, etc etc???? Please advise. Thanxx

[@WhiteSuperMemeist]

@@fredcollins8919 if you get shot in the head, you're going to die regardless. Helmets are meant to protect you from shrapnel and debris

[@fredcollins8919]

@@WhiteSuperMemeist true, as always but there ARE various different New helmets already IN USE as we speak by the almighty Beloved & elite US military (special Focus on US Army & USMC Infantry). Old heavy substandard kevlar "Fritz" helmets are long gone (finally) shipped off to other countries that could make use of them while we finally get far superior lighter compact better gear & weapon which WE most definitely NEED, WANT & DESERVE, more than Any other nation & NOW more than ever (2022 A.D.) esp with ongoing threats & conflicts worldwide (Ukraine, etc). We need to be more than ready for anything & thats where HAVING & using the RIGHT gear/weapons/equipment/vehicles etc etc ALL comes into play (along with several other factors), which make Huge differences in the end result

[@fludblud]

Speaking of Chinese armour, theres plenty of polyethylene armour on sale on alibaba claiming to be Lvl IV. Might want to try testing a few of those as private individuals as well as militias and irregular groups wearing these are likely to be extremely common in the future.

[@stukayou6735]

Hey, I have a family member who is in Chinese ballistic material industry. I believe they are claiming China now provide the world around 70% of ULMWPE. Which means there are many of the plates or helmets in market might not derectly made in China but used UHMWPE. So I do have confidence to claim that most of IV helmets or armor can provide similar performance with those were made in US. BTW, be careful when purchasing those ballistic products, some of them might be graded under Chinese standards rather than NIJ. I wish oxide can test some of those out too :)

[@fludblud]

@@stukayou6735 Yep thats what Ive heard too, many American armour companies claiming 'made in USA' actually source their plates from China and either just coat it or stamp their logos in the US to claim place of manufacture. The plates are obviously still capable, but their clients are definitely not fully aware of the actual place of manufacture.

[@antoniosanchezjr5886]

why the fuck is my tax money being spent on bullshit like this, I want y us to have the best armor money can buy

[@BuffRANGE]

I'd love to PMI those cores..

[@Oxide_does_his_best]

Ping me on instagram and I'll send them your way.

[@Tk3997]

I would ask where exactly that helmet was source from. I'm sorry to be blunt, but I don't really trust the results of some dude on the internet shooting at some random sample of seemingly unknown provenance vs... you know teams of engineers that actually built and tested the thing. Given that the ECH pretty much did everything that was claimed and more it seems pretty suspect that effectively the same people would then produce another helmet based on basically the same technology that is somehow catastrophically worse then 40 year old designs. You even question it yourself, and point out that it makes no sense, but then don't come to the much more logical conclusion here: something in my one off, improvised test of a random helmet might be off compared to testing by acutal professionals over a period of months or years over many helmets. Instead you basically go "we'll my back yard science is clearly infallible so the entire army procurement system must just be completely retarded"

[@Oxide_does_his_best]

The Ech also struggled against energy, but it weighs more than the IHPS. The results are pretty consistent considering that the helmets are made of basically the same materials. I invite you to source and test one yourself. It isn’t that hard to find one.

[@d.b.5070]

Exactly, these tests are normally done with specific equipment to simulate the helmet being worn. And pads make a huge difference.

[@fiskersproductions]

Yeah, the army also adopted UCP

[@flaksight]

I loved the assessment - but I'm also really happy you chose to start it off with some C&C Generals USA OST in the background, then following it up with Ed Harrison's Neotokyo soundtracks? I'm gonna redownload the whole album now. And damn, those tiny AP rounds look like a nasty ordeal to deal with.

[@Kris-cw8hj]

Okay one guy has played generals, thank god

[@burtbiggum499]

its called corruption

[@mjolnirdynamics8789]

Pfffffft. Jokes on you buddy. They're enlisting nothing but CAT4s now anyways. So those massive deformations won't affect them a bit.

[@Juuul89]

OH MY GOD IS THAT THE USA THEME FROM GENERALS?!!!! INSTANT SUBSCRIBE!

[@prfwrx2497]

For its weight, the IHPS is a fail. Either get you an ECH (only 0.3 lbs heavier), or honestly, forget about stopping bullets and get a frag stopper but stupid lightweight skull bucket. Let's be real. Although rifle rated helmets is nice, it's always going to be the case that more fuckers become casualties from helmet weight-related injuries than bullets to the brain. It don't matter if you get KO out of the business either from a bullet or a disc slippage or a snapping your neck on the doorframe, you're still out of the game. And also dead on the spot in 2/3 of those cases. Rifle helmets are for direct action raids. General use helmets need to get lighter if we want to counter the attrition rate problem. Reenlistment is already bad, and increasing medical discharges don't help. Not to mention that if mass conscription and war with peers happen sometime in the future, we know for a fact conscripts will find any opportunities to not wear a helmet. And the heavier it is, the worse that problem gets. Yes, that'd be a discipline problem. But then again, world wars don't give a shit that you have a discipline problem. NCOs have bigger problems than your negligent arses, and beating discipline into conscripts is definitely a time-proven method of turning an army of kids into a roaming plague of war criminals. (cough Imperial Japanese Army, the Soviets, and today, the Russians, cough).

[@EpicGamerino]

‘Russians today’?

[@КонстантинГоломозов]

🤔A foreigner who has not been in Russia and has not served in our renewed army speaks so confidently and arrogantly, typically Nazi-like about his supposed rival. Your greatest misfortune is that you are literally overflowing with contempt and arrogance. In a thousand years of Russian history, how many of these have remained in our land cannot be counted.

[@prfwrx2497]

@@EpicGamerino to be fair, don't judge them too bad. Perun's latest video on corruption explains it pretty well. Basically, Mr. Conscriptovich sees everyone is a thieving shitbag that fucked him over, so what he gon do? Might as well score his impoverished family living in Siberia or Buryatia their first taste of flush toilets and washing machines. That is, until the assholes in Russian Post and/or Military mail services "mishandled" their parcels all the way to their own forwarding address, into the New Russian black marketeer wholesaler. At least Belarusian truckers got a smoking hot deal on Diesel and tyres while it lasted. The boys probably got tens of thousands. Who cares if it fucks up the multi million dollar mobile SAM and gets your 40 mile "take Kyiv in 72 hour" convoy motti'd and wasted by Imam Bayraktar yeeting the holy MAM grenade. It's not as if we're going into Ukraine, right? Right?

[@Seth9809]

IHPS is one of the lightest helmet so far....What are you talking about?

[@prfwrx2497]

@@Seth9809 it's 0.3 lbs less than the rifle ammo stopping ECH, but de facto only rated to stops fragments. Even pistol hits would cave your skull in. So for its shit protection, it's heavy as fuck. IIRC frag helmets like the Maritime (if it was low cut, it'd be) 2 pounds or less, esp. If UHMWPE. IHPS is pushing 3.

[@ClassWarMatrix]

based command and conquer generals music

[@basicallyanelephant2673]

Always good content, nice work

[@TheBenghaziRabbit]

Love the C&C Generals music in the background. it kept distracting me from the info you were portraying!!

[@loganwc99]

Use them at work. Wasn’t aware of the ballistic characteristics. This is really concerning

[@TheSunderingSea]

Work? Are you SWAT/HRT or something?

[@alvacole2372]

@@TheSunderingSea idk dawg probably Army because it was issued to the Army.

[@loganwc99]

I’m in the army lol

[@cmdrhudson]

Always ask yourself: who they gonna send to war? Themselfes, or me?

[@mr.unknown5596]

7:12 cheeto dust

[@slappomatthew]

lol does the russian govt care about it solders. thats a hard no bro.

[@temugenie2698]

I have seen steel helmets from World War 2 preform better against 9mm. You are saying that a 300 dollar helmet would have the same protection I say 7 dollar steel vz. 53 would do the same! I don't understand how that thing ever got a contract the only good thing on it is the mounting rails.

[@robotmexicainducky6865]

You should use the padding in the helmet, and use a ballistic dummy head.

[@lardthing7417]

Bit of an odd question (and it's fine if you don't want to answer it) but what are your thoughts on Garand Thumb's recent video that tested the IHPS? Specifically, his helmet seemed to have performed better in his testing compared to yours. Do you think it's because he tested out the new gen IHPS?

[@Oxide_does_his_best]

I thought the helmet he got still deformed pretty badly.

[@lardthing7417]

@@Oxide_does_his_best compared to the ECH he was also testing, it seemed to perform better. The only case where I think this wasn't true was when he tested a .44 magnum for the 2nd time against the ECH (1st time was around the helmet's edge, so it penned), and even then the back face deformation was comparable to the IHPS. Edit: performance of both were also equal with the 9mm, with Mr. Thumb seeming to have insinuated that both impacts were survivable.

[@Oxide_does_his_best]

@@lardthing7417 I got super dif results with 44 on the ech from my two hits, but both sucked. Impact points matter on polyethylene helmets.

[@lardthing7417]

​​@@Oxide_does_his_best fair enough on that. I still think the IHPS he tested performed better than the one in your test, but I may be clouded with bias since he was much more positive in his commentary with regards to the IHPS's performance. His commentary didn't seem out of place either, since the helmet did appear to have deformation that-while definitely not comfortable-was mostly better than the ECH: a helmet that's saved lives before. (Also thank you for taking the time to respond bby)

[@Oxide_does_his_best]

@@lardthing7417 I am much less comfortable with deformation than the DOD is

[@Sarabia117]

Mofos on ebay asking 1k plus for this...

[@winlin1366]

2:50 holdup Holy shit, how did you even manage to get one of these new models? Even older models were quite hard to find Also, would be interested for a comparison between old and new model

[@Oxide_does_his_best]

I suspect its commercial

[@georgesimmons2517]

0:00 Thank you Chris Cappy, our favorite pentagon propaganda mouthpiece

[@kianjsr]

I'd love to see how British helmets stand up to these tests considering they've sent a few different models over to Ukraine the past couple of months

[@alnn1372]

Check out Mikes Militaria who has shot a mk 7 and Mk 6

[@overdrivelzma.9219]

Many helmets were pierced or seriously damaged by the new bullets of the AK 74M

[@robertmoore119]

Hmm, the armies newest helmet is a slight upgrade over the last one. Not only is it an improvement, it is also lighter than the lost model. I concur that the helmet did not appear to do very well at all. Those shots are from armor piercing type round at point blank range. The helmet you tested does much better at a more realistic range. Our troops do not wish to be that close to our enemy. They will likely be at a much greater distance from our enemies, and they will be behind cover. The angles at which bullets might hit a helmet at range and behind cover all also more optimal for a survivable hit. There is another video that illustrates this helm being hit by non armor piercing rounds at point blank and from a distance with rifle rounds. I am pleased too see that there is armor that can be added as that was not in the previous video that I had seen from another content creator. There is another point that you brought up that I am not sure the military will address, as that does cost us. However keeping our troops alive is worth a cost. I wonder if the plastic mounts you describe can actually be an issue as they save weight and maybe cost, but plastics do become very brittle in low temps. If they are of some sort of composite, their might not be such an issue in lower temps. I almost forgot another subject I was thinking about. America is working on BCI technology. If our enemies have our type of tech, they will eventually be able to read our troops thoughts. We don't need our enemies to know what our troops are planning. So maybe we need a helmet that not only blocks bullets, but also tech that can read minds. Unfortunately, that will also come at an additional cost. That could be an electronic ad on for our current helms, or it could be build in to the material. Even if we made that type and say they were much more expensive, maybe the add on. Not all of the troops would need the accessory or helm. Just those that are doing the planning.

[@breezycheese3677]

I was also a bit iffy on his standing range. I would be very surprised if the helmet did manage to stop those bullet penetrating rounds from that close up.

[@pieterandjuanchronicles9849]

MIC really out there still giving troops low cuts, still fighting the last …last war I see. Honestly sad to see them issue kit like it’s OIF and on top of that develop a lowest bidder pissin hot SIG clusterfuck of a gun instead of issuing high cuts with electronic earpro and suppressors.

[@kuki1824]

Hihg cut is bs

[@Seth9809]

SIG gun is fine, you're just old.

[@john.t645]

@@Seth9809 zoomer m14 tier lmao

[@googlepissoff5776]

High cut helmets look super gay and don’t cover the squishiest parts of my skull. Why would I ever want to wear one over an ACH/ECH or MICH?

[@Seth9809]

@@john.t645 >"This new thing sucks! It doesn't do what my favorite thing does!" >Repeating the people who were upset about tanks, guns, and any other change in warfare that's ever happened.

[@natefox5801]

I appreciate the C&C Generals Menu music

[@Aradin56]

I wish I had the resources to provide you with AP rounds or gear, I can't even afford to buy some 855A1 for myself lol Good work on this testing series though, I love the videos.

[@kiddkief2729]

And... Where you get russian military grade bullets🤔

[@wprstx2]

When the Neotokyo ost hits just right. Great vid!

[@boolsdip]

Isn't that CNC generals?

[@RUDYLOVE72]

I dont change the pasgt kevlar helmet for lightweights crap like the ech mich or ach or ihps

[@cryx4]

7n21 hard to find? but i can buy it off peacekeeper for a dollar!

[@thebreadman1144]

The audio is so quiet, but the video is absolutely amazing!

[@muwuny]

I'd like to see a test of the British Virtus helmet, it's another polyethylene helmet. I wonder if it performs as well as the ECH, or deforms like this.

[@arakami8547]

I'd like to know as well. I imagine it would perform better, there are a number of ballistic pads surrounding the interior that I imagine would prove better at stopping these deformations. I'm sure its much more comfortable and overall a better helmet seeing as though there are little complaints over it; minor problems regarding build quality when it was first issued in 2016 have been resolved if I recall correctly.

[@michbushi]

"why spend eleven hundred a piece for a helmet that performs worse than a kevlar one which would cost the Army a THIRD" - awww, you are so cute - you haven't figured out that it is the ENTIRE POINT??

[@wb2194]

When I was deployed one of my jobs was to initiate the death paperwork for KIAs. I can tell you the ACH did not stop the tiny shards of shrapnel, there were very few bullet strikes to the ACH that I saw. When a rocket explodes there are thousands of razor sharp shards that slice right through the ACH.

[@trentbyington5957]

That’s interesting

[@easyk03]

I personally like the fit, feel and look of the IHPS, but I hope the NG IHPS is much better ballistics speaking.

[@Spootythefoozler]

It's a red herring to me that the designers and manufacturers of these helmets, accompanied by US government representatives and DoD representatives, did not even consider testing these helmets on this scale.

[@AdamantLightLP]

See, thats why I don't really buy this video. The US military, while it may make some poor choices, isn't THIS dumb.

[@ddalke21]

While I understand wanting to push the limits. I would rather see rifle rounds at distance. Most combat does not happen at point blank range and also not with pistols. I would use 100m at a minimum. To show "real life" combat performance.

[@WardenWolf]

The biggest flaw with PE helmets is they inherently degrade over time, unlike the rigid fibrous helmets they replaced. PE helmets actually chemically break down just sitting on the shelf.

[@SeanCMonahan]

I know polyethylene breaks down when exposed to UV, but what would cause it to break down when in storage?

[@litchivoyou6947]

One thing jump to me. You're shooting very close. But in reality people are between 100 to 300 meters far away from each other. Can you do the same because i'm pretty sure the result will be different

[@TGC1775]

Wish Tarkov followed these results.

[@tsorevitch2409]

Tarkov Devs have to significantly buff helmets stats as it's waaaaaaaay easier to make headshots in the game compared to real life. If helmets stats were real pro-games would just shred everything with PM

[@TGC1775]

@@tsorevitch2409 “realistic as playable” then altyn just tanks everything lol

[@tsorevitch2409]

@@TGC1775 personally I think they should have balanced gameplay not with armor stats but with approach to weapon handling - more indirect controll based on character stats significantly more affected by movement, load etc. In game characters with 30kg load and in protection gear handle the guns in a way that sport shooters do on the range wearing nothing but minimal sport rig

[@duck5336]

Perfect example of looking cool, but not actually being worth a crap.

[@karlbach1451]

Yep. I’ve swapped mine back for the old model. That thing is literally bulkier, just as heavy, and doesn’t allow for any kind of thermal device mounting. I’ve been hearing the intention was to issue highcuts but the order was messed up. Probably just rumors.