Beautiful aircraft carrier. The Russian embassy in Oslo protested as usual. Norway is a free country and can invite whatever guests it wants. Greetings from Poland.
@workop11 ай бұрын
Yeah. Russia has no right to tell us what we can and cant do!
@GnosticAtheist11 ай бұрын
And considering we are NATO its not really a question of inviting guests, but allies.
@robertbraden445411 ай бұрын
We should have invited the Russian ambassador on board for a tour. 😎
@dioghaltasfoirneartach725811 ай бұрын
@@robertbraden4454 He'd have to run to the bathroom repeatedly... 🚽🧻 🏃♂️
@290766rene11 ай бұрын
If the Ruzzian ambassador complains, kick him out of the country. He has nothing good to do there anyway. And who on earth wants to have an embassy in Ruzzia ? Fck em.
@user-tc5nv6so3o11 ай бұрын
Greetings from Germany. Thank you for coming, it is Amazing. Proud of the United States❤
@Montana2.012211 ай бұрын
Now that's something you don't see everyday. Greetings from the US🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@Tritsekk11 ай бұрын
Thanks, wright back at you!
@roudyman77711 ай бұрын
"Thank God this monster is on our side" - Wise European man
@sabyegrp11 ай бұрын
Born and raised in Bergen. Came to the states with my parents when I was 10. Eventually ended up in the U S Navy and served four years on an Aircraft carrier. Not as big as this one, but still very lethal. It was an amazing experience. I worked in Navigation, so spent most of my time on the bridge. We were in the Pacific, and deployed to Vietnam and other far placed. Recovered Apollo 11 and 12. Now many years later, I'm proud to see this amazing ship visit my homeland. Proud of both my countries.
@1Phenixbleu11 ай бұрын
Thankyou Sir, for your service to World Peace ❤❤
@robertbraden445411 ай бұрын
You recovered Apollo 11 and 12? That's really cool. Most sailors don't get that much excitement.
@sabyegrp11 ай бұрын
@@robertbraden4454 I worked in the Navigation Department on the bridge. After leaving Pearl Harbor for the South Pacific recovery zone we spent several more days practising for the recovery. On the morning of Apollo 11, the President came onboard. He flew in from the Johnston Islands. He was on his way to China for a summitt. It was an amazing morning concluding with the recovery of the apollo 11 crew. A few months later we recovered Apollo 12. But Apollo 11 was the big one.
@prollins644311 ай бұрын
Bergen? Did you ever hear of Hillcrest Academy? I had many classmates come from Bergen for a year of study
@mandygarrison818811 ай бұрын
I so respect and miss all the men and women who serve their country. They are so loved… no one can ever know exactly how much unless you’ve been a Navy wife and mother.
@bingobutler965611 ай бұрын
I sailed into Oslo in 1982 on board the USS Raliegh. Amazing city great people. Semper Fi
@Tritsekk11 ай бұрын
Thank you for your service! And for the kind words!
@johncee85311 ай бұрын
Better to have them and not need them than to need them and not have them!
@jamieteal210711 ай бұрын
Well said johncee853 👍🇦🇺
@johncee85311 ай бұрын
@@jamieteal2107 Lots of people like to run their mouths, commies in particular, about how easily they could kill one of our carriers. It's almost as if they forget what would happen if they tried...
@friedrichdritte287711 ай бұрын
The Russian clown protest 😂 What an amazing ship. 😱 Greetings from Germany 🇩🇪☺️
@degenetron759011 ай бұрын
Tankies, russians and anti americans get so mad at this, but you should be nothing but happy that this mighty thing is on our side (nato) I'm from Belgium but god bless USA for covering our ass
@wesc675511 ай бұрын
Norway might be the most beautiful place on the planet. Respect and love from the US.
@yvindlarsen677811 ай бұрын
this makes me feel so safe
@degenetron759011 ай бұрын
Ikr, knowing this thing is on our side. It could probably single handidly destroy the entirity of the russian forces. Too bad for nukes we cant touch those goblins
@eddale555711 ай бұрын
Same here and it was so nice watching it coming into Oslo i so it, i was in a little boat it is insane big and nice, thx USA!!
@markdeckard765111 ай бұрын
@brusjanburger the nukes don't matter as much as Putin would like people to believe, because its an automatic Lose. Strategically, the nuke button would be equivalent to Hitler in the bunker with gun in mouth. Putin would rather engineer a new narrative and live.
@rubiconklbrutorowman757711 ай бұрын
U should be indeed!
@lonerider617511 ай бұрын
That is one huge boat. 😮
@degenetron759011 ай бұрын
That thing is so mighty, I can't imagine the size seeing it in real life
@Tritsekk11 ай бұрын
Believe me, it’s awesome! It sailed in at a slant, so I couldn’t get a good sense of the proportions. But when it passed full broad side… whoa! Fun fact. It has more fighters on board than whole Norwegian Royal Air Force has.
@hockeysladeАй бұрын
@@Tritsekk was it loud? could you hear it or did the helicopter drown out the sound?
@Kulumuli11 ай бұрын
I heard that this ship had to deviate from the normal shipping lane close to this point because it's draft is deeper than other vessels using this shipping lane. I also think that this is the biggest ship ever to sail into the Oslo Fjord. When they passed the Oscarsborg fortress it looked like they stood guard of honour on deck. The fortress played vital role against the nazi invanision of Norway in 1940.
@Tritsekk11 ай бұрын
There where lines of sailors on forward deck here too. Fjord gets quite narrow by my home harbor. So I was sure happy to see this magnificent beast so close.
@Dave-mt4dh11 ай бұрын
Long live Norway and peace to all ! ❤❤❤🇳🇴🇳🇴🇳🇴
@TTTT-oc4eb11 ай бұрын
The brand new Hipper class heavy cruiser Blücher was sunk at Oscarsborg 9 April 1940, and the "pocket battleship" Lützow and light cruiser Emden forced to turn around. The 28cm guns that fired the two first hits were from the 19th century, but would have caused severe damage even to a ship like Gerald R. Ford.
@srfh211 ай бұрын
@@Tritsekk Thank you for your assist in allowing this to happen. Greetings from USA
@Cta200611 ай бұрын
There have been bigger cruise ships
@290766rene11 ай бұрын
I was visiting Oslo back in December. The British aircraft carrier Queen Elisabeth was there at that time. It was a huge and impressive ship, really nice. The USS Gerald R. Ford is probably the newest and largest aircraft carrier in the US Navy. It must be amazing to look at in real. I wish I saw it too. it is even larger than the British aircraft carrier. 😀👍
@rubiconklbrutorowman757711 ай бұрын
almost twice size! British The British aircraft carrier Queen Elisabeth size is incase someone forget 65,000 ton compared 2 Ford Class carrier 100,000 ton!
@MikeOxlong-11 ай бұрын
Yea the Ford is the largest carrier ever built… Some 1100 feet (335 meters) long! It even dwarfs the Nimitz class carriers both in length and especially girth (due to the island placement and extended width flight deck)…
@Markus117d11 ай бұрын
The Nimitz class is 333 m long The Queen Elizabeth class is 284 m . I can't really say either is dwarfed by the Ford class on size,
@OrangeMapleLeaf8 ай бұрын
Thank you for sharing this video. Norway is so beautiful and this aircraft carrier very impressive.
@chrisc807011 ай бұрын
Thank you to our Norwegian friends for the kind welcome!
@feonor2611 ай бұрын
You are welcome back any time
@markrenton579111 ай бұрын
Omg is so big. I love big 😍😍
@markdeckard765111 ай бұрын
That's what she said!
@markrenton579111 ай бұрын
@@markdeckard7651 😂😂
@danielhiggins335011 ай бұрын
Americans with Europe (NATO) will always work together to protect what we have. We are better and stronger together. Norway Love from the West
@johnshields685211 ай бұрын
🇺🇸 I remember in the late 80's whenthe JFK aircraft carrier came to Boston harbor, it's hard to get a sense of scale on video, they are absolutely massive in person🇺🇸
@Tritsekk11 ай бұрын
My 32ft wooden boat is in that harbor. The carrier was as large as our wave beaker. And believe me. It is an decent walk from the bridgehead to the lightning house.
@bobkonradi102711 ай бұрын
I think the largest carrier that is available to the public to inspect is the Midway, berthed as a museum ship in San Diego. I believe its over 900-ft long, as compared to the Nimitz class, which is nearly 1000-ft long. That said its possible to get an idea as to just how immense these ships are. Just walking from the parking area to the ship, we get an idea of just how "big" that big is. then to walk the weather deck / launch and recovery deck, the hangar deck, etc, its huge. And then to look across San Diego bay at one (or more) of the Nimitz class carriers in port, they're over 100-ft longer yet. It was good to see the Ford finally get all of its teething problems solved, and now its the pride of the fleet.
@user-cd4oy3lg5u11 ай бұрын
Historic first port entered on the first tour
@henryvagincourt450211 ай бұрын
Sorry mucker, her first outside port visit was Halifax Harbour, Canada, back in 2022.
@1chish11 ай бұрын
@@henryvagincourt4502 And she visited Portsmouth a month later.
@oljobo11 ай бұрын
Førsteklasses video ‼️👍😃
@eddale555711 ай бұрын
Perfekt YAY 😎😎👍
@tommaxwell42911 ай бұрын
Some of my fondest Navy memories are going into ports and allowing the local populous to come onboard and look around. I remember one time in Italy a little girl looked at the skull and crossbones on the tails of the Jolly Rogers F14's and asked, "Why do they have those on there? Do they like to kill people?" I gave her a story about a shark in a swimming pool. And while it is a very beautiful animal, it is a threat to humans and might have to be destroyed. I don't know if she accepted that or not. But I was always very proud to show off the USS John F Kennedy CV67 to people in other countries. Unfortunately, we never made it to Oslo.
@Phillip Banes Well yes R & D is always costed to the first in class. And it cost $18 Bn (and counting btw as it still has faults). As for 'cheaper' well that is a relative term. The second in class (USS John F Kennedy) is costing $13.5 Bn. That is still nearly 3 times the cost of a UK QE Class carrier.
@poxous385411 ай бұрын
@@1chish it will cost more
@1chish11 ай бұрын
@Phillip Banes A Ford class is not 3 times more capable than a QE (75 aircraft vs 60). For that $18 Bn we could build 3 QE Class carriers (with $3 Bn left over) which would provide 180 aircraft at surge over a wide combat area. The Ford provides 75 aircraft from one, albeit moving, position. I know which option an Admiral fighting a war would take. I already pointed out that the second carrier (Kennedy) has cost $13.5 Bn (and counting). The third (Enterprise) is under construction and budgeted in fiscal 23/24 at $12.9 Bn.
@1chish11 ай бұрын
@Phillip Banes You know Philip when you quote Wikipedia as your source without understanding the context you really have no argument to offer. Forgive my detailed response: 1. The first seagoing skipper (a certain Captain Kyd) said when asked by an American reporter in New York 'how many aircraft?' Without hesitation he replied '60 at surge but normally two squadrons of 12 each'. So I will go with a man who commanded the ship all through its sea trials and F-35 development voyages. 2. The Royal Navy has published a deck parking plan with 42 aircraft, with a further 20 in the hangar deck, and flight ops still ongoing. 3. The US carriers operate 4th Gen F-18s while the QEs operate 5th Gen F-35s. 4. We use a different rotary aircraft delivered early warning system and don't need the Hawkeye. In any case drones make it redundant. 5. There is no way an F-18 is 'more capable' than an F-35 regardless of launch system. if that was so why is the US Navy and USMC replacing F-18s with F-35s? 6. Catapults have a weight limit and a fully tooled F-18 goes up partly fuelled and uses the 'Buddy Up' refuelling system developed by British carriers. 7. The F-35s on the QE have been proven to fly off fully fuelled and with 22,000lb of weapons. It was called 'Beast Mode'. 8. The QEs can deliver initial sorties far quicker than a Nimitz because they just turn on to the launch line and go. On recovery even when the SRVL system is used they can land clear of the launching aircraft. During CSG21 4 ship mixes of USMC and RAF F-35s were going off at 30 second intervals. 9. CATOBAR launches needs to be 'staged' and that takes about 5 minutes per aircraft. In addition when recovering, the catapults on the angled deck are lost to use. Even the Port catapult is delayed by landing aircraft in case of a 'bolter'. All 4 are rarely used together. 10. In the first 6 hours the QEs deliver more and faster sorties but over 24 hours the Nimitz delivers some 10% more sorties. 11. the lifts on the QEs have always worked. Unlike those on the Ford. the weapons storage system has also always worked unlike the Ford's systems. And please don't try to suggest EMALS works reliably. 12. Nuclear power for carriers offers absolutely NO strategic or tactical advantage. And certainly not for the extra $12 Bn it costs to operate in its life compared to conventional carriers. They still need RAS for weapons, victualling and aviation fuel. The accompanying ships are all diesel powered so need RAS for fuel. During CSG21 the QE and its accompanying ships went round the world with no difficulty. 13. What no one mentions is the environmental risk of nuclear powered carriers, the fact they need $5 Bn refuels mid life and cost billions to scrap at the end of their lives. The first nuclear carrier has yet to be scrapped. 14., To suggest a reduction from $13 Bn to $12.5 Bn per ship is something to be praised just makes me smile.
@richglenn372911 ай бұрын
13 billion USD. Expensive to build and operate. Over 1 million USD per day just to operate. All this for a warship everyone hopes will never sail in anger.
@henryvagincourt450211 ай бұрын
Not over it's 50 year+ life time, and most of that USD is spent in the US generating work mucker.
@starling6111 ай бұрын
If it never sails in anger or fires one shot then you will know it was worth every penny spent on it.
@1chish11 ай бұрын
Sorry Rich the cost was $18 Bn and she has been laid up in dock since she was acquired in 2017 trying to get EMALS and other stuff working until 2022 when they let her out of US waters.
@1chish11 ай бұрын
@@henryvagincourt4502 I am not convinced a nuclear carrier is worth the money. This ship cost $18 Bn, was flooded up in 2013, acquired in 2017 and only did her first trip outside US waters late last year. If we had the USA's budget we could build 3 x QE Class carriers and still $3 Bn left over for what she cost. She still needs RAS for victualling, aircraft fuel and weapons and her CSG ships all burn diesel. So there is always a tanker / supply ship. The US Congress did a survey of conventional vs nuclear carriers and in today's money a 1997 nuclear carrier cost $15 Bn more to operate in its life than a conventional carrier. That does not include post service scrapping costs which are huge. Or build costs of $18 Bn. Forgive me suggesting to a Matelot anything about sea warfare but I think you might agree an Admiral going to war would rather have 3 x capable carries offering 180+ aircraft than one very capable carrier offering 75?
@henryvagincourt450211 ай бұрын
@@1chish I cant argue with many of the points made, but refuelling a carrier of this size with diesel would require more than one accompanying tanker, that raises many questions for the Yanks. Where do they get the tankers, fuel from, given they can deploy a possible 11 Carrier Strike Groups. It would also require a change of design to the Ford Class taking space away for diesel tanks. My other point would be the Ford's need a huge amount of power for EMALS, nuclear guarantees that. If I was going to war, give me one Yank carrier over the QE which is a sad statement, but it's just the way the MoD have ineptly ran the Royal Navy the last two decades or more.
@andrzejbarnoldswick677411 ай бұрын
I to się nazywa potęga jest piękny 😂
@davidhynes8 ай бұрын
what a beautiful site.
@srfh29 ай бұрын
My visit to Norway in 1995 was amazing. The people were amazing.
@Kenneth_James11 ай бұрын
Wow, yhe view compared to the videos uploaded from the UK a few months ago. This is so much closer. All those Fjords bring the deep water right up to you. I feel like we should hire someone that works with Bald Eagles to and keeps a few on the carriers Have them circle above at ports calls haha
@Tritsekk11 ай бұрын
I could have stood much closer, on the storm breaker, but it was rather crowded there. And I had my dog with me. I don’t thing I could get the whole ship in frame down there.
@psho156211 ай бұрын
Now that is a BIG stick! 😀
@andregrenacs298111 ай бұрын
God bless America!
@honkbob11 ай бұрын
Love Norway!
@jerryumfress903011 ай бұрын
There's enough firepower on that boat to really mess up somebody's day😎
@Tritsekk11 ай бұрын
Jeah! It has more fire power than an average country with all of its combined military arms. For instance. It has more fighter planes on board than Royal Norwegian Air Force. And more soles serving on board than Royal Norwegian Marine had in active duty in 2020
@adamsadventures991911 ай бұрын
wowzers! too cool
@Teufelshund11 ай бұрын
Lol. I lived in Fagerstrand way back in '86-'87. So funny.
@rubiconklbrutorowman757711 ай бұрын
Much smaller than expected, in terms of Norway people lined up to see US fire power marvel!
@edwardcronin94311 ай бұрын
Yes optical allusion in this cideo
@2990rick11 ай бұрын
that's really cool 👍👍
@PauloFerreira-nz3ml11 ай бұрын
God bless America. The land of the free.
@colonellKurtz11 ай бұрын
In the background music should be rather Imperial march !
@Tritsekk11 ай бұрын
It is heavily copywrited. Otherwise I would mind. There was large crowd and chatting around me, so I had to have something.
@kathy637211 ай бұрын
Does anyone know what the size of this ship is? Looks like many jets on deck any idea how many are on the ship daily? I can’t imagine the size of this magnificent ship in person what a incredible experience to see.
@RAZORBLACKRX11 ай бұрын
It's the largest aircraft carrier in the world and carries 75+ aircraft and despite her enormous size, she has unbelievable horsepower and maneuverability.
@rubiconklbrutorowman757711 ай бұрын
Above blogger *gangster has stated correctly, as "Length 1106 feet; beam 250+ feet; draft 37 feet; displacement 100,000+ tons; propulsion, 2 Bechtel nuclear reactors" that can go 25 years without refueling and think about that? British Aircraft carrier is 65,000 ton, almost HALF-size as US carrier, and we, US, have 11-carrier of this size or will be replaced to ENTIRE modern 9-weapons elevators, etc. pls remember, likely Poland or near, our 10,000-ton destroyers, (always two or three), 2-submarins are standing by near Baltic Sea, like Poland, Estonia, Latavia, cz carrier NEVER travels alone!
@bob80q11 ай бұрын
ever heard of google????
@stevenaltepeter515810 ай бұрын
It is approximately 4.5 acres equivalent it’s that large.
@kathy637210 ай бұрын
@@bob80q Gee, never have, thank for the tip. I just like talking with other people who are knowledgeable in so many areas
@haystackhider715811 ай бұрын
Check this song out: Pistolaudio - The US army! (Awesome Norwegian Grunge)
@Zoli04911 ай бұрын
How long are you staying in Oslo? THX!
@yankinwaoz11 ай бұрын
Did they have tours for the public while in Oslo?
@steamfan71479 ай бұрын
A Carrier visit usually boosts the local economy by draining the beer supply.🤣
@pk742211 ай бұрын
JESUS........... ther are boats, and then, there are BOATS!!! WOW!!!
@kathyschwarz45911 ай бұрын
AWSOME 🇺🇸
@geoffdevore632111 ай бұрын
Biggest ship to sail into the fjord, since the German Battleship Tirpitz did during WW2!!
@TTTT-oc4eb11 ай бұрын
I don't think Tirpitz ever was in Oslofjorden - she started in Trøndelag and ended up in Troms. And at 252 meters and 52,000 tons she was still considerably smaller than Gerald R. Ford. But arguably even more impressive - IMHO the last generation of battleships were the most impressive warships ever built; Bismarck/Tirpitz, Vanguard, Yamato, Iowa, Richelieu, Littorio.
@Cta200611 ай бұрын
Biggest warship. There has been bigger cruise ships
@feonor2611 ай бұрын
Tirpitz never sailed there, but Blücher did....and ended its life on the bottom of the fjord
@TTTT-oc4eb11 ай бұрын
@@feonor26 Yes, but Blücher was "only" a heavy cruiser, and at 16,000 tons much smaller than the other ships mentioned here. On that fateful day she also sailed with two other cruisers, Lützow (13,000 tons) and Emden (6,000 tons) - both of which were damaged and had to turn around.
@srikark353211 ай бұрын
Super!
@cabininthewoods732611 ай бұрын
I bet this is the 1st time they're seeing a ship that size
@Tritsekk11 ай бұрын
Not entirely true. There has been cruise ships sailing inn that are larger then USS. G.F.
@MrValdinio11 ай бұрын
Admiral kuznetsov - Where is the smoke ?
@peterfireflylund11 ай бұрын
“How does it move without tug boats? What is this kind of magic?”
@hisaddle11 ай бұрын
nuclear propulsion
@colonellKurtz11 ай бұрын
Beast
@Tritsekk11 ай бұрын
That was the description I also had in mind. Those carriers are not gracious or beautiful in any way. They do get their message clearly delivered.
@TheSifujang11 ай бұрын
This, ladys and gentlemen is what 10 billon $ looks like
@skunklover572511 ай бұрын
Actually it's $13 Billion, but, you we're close.
@kiabtoomlauj624911 ай бұрын
@@skunklover5725 It's really more like $15B. The Nimitz are between $10B - $12B; but this Ford class is around $15B, which, if you think about it, is NOT that expensive, for a nuclear propelled ship that could continue sailing for over 25 years non-stopped.... given that we have totally useless super Yachts --- just pleasure seeking ships that carry no more than a few dozen to a few hundred super rich people and their friends ---- that cost close to $1B these days. The super carrier here has 3,000 to 5,000 people and close to 100 high end aircraft, each costing $90M to $150M... surrounded by 15 to 20 smaller ships and boats, plus 1-2 nuclear subs that carries, each, around 20 ICBMs/SLBM, each giant missile containing 10 to 12 smaller MIRV warheads, each MIRV having up to 20 times the blast yield of the giant FAT MAN tht was dropped on Japan in 1045.... This floating city has a better chance of hitting a rock and sinking than being taken out by pirates or an enemy nation...
@henryvagincourt450211 ай бұрын
@@kiabtoomlauj6249 Not sure where you get your info cock, but a carrier battle group of 15 ships is pushing it even for the USN.....as for having a SSBN with the group, not a chance, there job is to disappear and to remain undetected, until the patrol ends.
@mrschuyler11 ай бұрын
@@henryvagincourt4502 Not an SSBN, but an attack submarine or two. Like the USS Dallas in Red October.
@tommhenderson508311 ай бұрын
Welcome!!!
@dallastaylor54799 ай бұрын
What I find odd is that as an American, I have never seen an AC Carrier, tank, Bradley, nothing. I see this and videos of tanks on Polish highways, and I can not imagine it.
@slappymcgillicuddy753211 ай бұрын
This video has me pinin' for the fjords
@ariobarzan871411 ай бұрын
US . Militray . Power 🇺🇸 👍👍👍👍👍👍
@richardclaus475111 ай бұрын
That must be some deeeeeep water
@michaeld.uchiha908411 ай бұрын
Thats a big girl.
@meintingles439611 ай бұрын
After the Kinzhal being downed multiple times, I guess hypersonics are no longer a threat to this beast.
@markdeckard765111 ай бұрын
Anything can be a threat, just like any idiot could roll a grenade into a police station. The issue is that firing on it would be suicide
@Markus117d11 ай бұрын
Modern Hypersonic missiles that can manoeuvre are a threat depending on how good the targeting sensors are, Kinzhal how ever isn't one of those, It's a version of a normal ballistic missile that has been adapted so it can be launched by a plane ( Air launched ) The German V2 rocket from WW2 is a balistic missile that is also a hypersonic weapon. Kinzhal apart from being air launched isn't fundamentally that different. The Chinese Hypersonic glide body missiles that can manoeuvre however are a much more serious threat to a moving target...
@1Phenixbleu11 ай бұрын
Please note that the Gerald Ford was built under the direction of a vietnamese "boat people" lady. She came to USA when she was a child.
@markk240311 ай бұрын
as you can hear. Norway messed it up with keyboards.
@fritzpeter633411 ай бұрын
Haben die Geschenke dabei ?
@johnsonofjohn167811 ай бұрын
Ford in a fjord.
@chrisdavis722811 ай бұрын
I wonder how they keep boats away from it
@Tritsekk11 ай бұрын
Just after 30 min of taking this video a small boat was shown away by gun boat with .50cal turret. There was lots of police, US Navy and coastguard small vessels around it. Plus 5 helicopter in the air.
@feonor2611 ай бұрын
Some were stopped by small gun boats from Norwegian Navy.
@davidbruce537711 ай бұрын
High tide required for that passage.
@andrewtaylor94011 ай бұрын
How the hell does something that big, move that fast, that close to shore?
@peterfireflylund11 ай бұрын
“Speed through superior nuclear power.”
@clementgoetke238511 ай бұрын
they know what they are doing
@andrewtaylor94011 ай бұрын
@@clementgoetke2385 I think that tugboat behind it may actually be water skiing
@Cta200611 ай бұрын
I think maybe the footage was speed up a bit
@feonor2611 ай бұрын
@@Cta2006 No it's not. It is a really fast boat. On top speed you can stand on water skis behind it.
@hybridjohn111 ай бұрын
top off provisions then set sail for the Baltic. Maybe drop into Helsinki to give our new NATO member a hello. That should give ruzzia a reason to complain.
@williamhopkins416211 ай бұрын
DONT RUN INTO THE DOCK THAT FLATTOP IS HUGE!!
@JdIm6fhjLgdWRhn7 ай бұрын
крутой
@Kenneth_James11 ай бұрын
BUILT.FORD.TOUGH☮
@angusabbott561511 ай бұрын
Is this a provocation to ruZZia ? Will they TOW their (only) aircraft carrier to Kaliningrad in response?
@feonor2611 ай бұрын
Who gives a shit what Russia thinks?
@chientatuong84695 ай бұрын
Tiep tuc.xhuyen tầu
@timallison856011 ай бұрын
with hills like that all around the port they will be flying those awacs around the clock.
@chientatuong84695 ай бұрын
Đánh tat tren biển
@chientatuong84695 ай бұрын
Len bat noDo o ngaoi va van xhuyen bang se nho vào
@DaehawkКүн бұрын
You're gonna need a bigger...oh wait never mind. I see you have one.
@BALOYBEACHBUM11 ай бұрын
That's the Ford, wait until Chevy and Mopar get on scene!
@user-en7ve6ky6i11 ай бұрын
៰
@lupo986811 ай бұрын
Im Schwarzen Meer tobt das Chaos und die machen Urlaub in Norwegen 🤷🏻♂️
@MohamedAli-xy1sx11 ай бұрын
Russe 🙄🙄🙄
@user-vf6xs9rv7v11 ай бұрын
😂поздравляем Осло с попаданием в прицел! Спать вам не очень комфортно, бойтесь, как бы чего не вышло!
@Tritsekk11 ай бұрын
Да да. Угрызении это все что вы способные делать. И это все что вы умеете. А жалко! очень жалко.
@juracydiassantos319311 ай бұрын
É triste mais é verdade ver um monte de ferro com +- 6 mil tripulantes sabendo que basta um míssil Russo ou Chinês para mandar prol fundo do mar .😂😂
@RAA-ud2ll11 ай бұрын
big sucker
@kenfischerjr521911 ай бұрын
Be nice if we had infrastructure like this IN the U.S.
@waltershearls11 ай бұрын
You should move to a country that's has infrastructure.
@Joe-sn6ir11 ай бұрын
then stop electing idiots.......you know...democrats.
@warningsigns452611 ай бұрын
Trump said designer had no common sense - and catapult and elevators can be downed with glass of water 2021
@Tritsekk11 ай бұрын
I down a aspirin pill with glass of water. Good that US has Trump to point out the weak points.
@kiabtoomlauj624911 ай бұрын
The guy is a Reality TV show clown, beloved as he is by his Alternate Reality, Right Wing Christian Nationalist MAGA cult members... although I must admit he's very convincing when he looked straight at the TV camera and said he used to have an uncle who taught at MIT, when Trump was younger... and that uncle, Trump said, had told & had taught him aplenty about how nuclear stuff worked! Now, he knows everything --- "more than any other human beings" --- on how ICBMs & other nukes work. America and the world are so lucky, we have such a genius, alongside his friend, Comrade KGB Col. Putin... to help guide humanity in these perilous times!
@peterfireflylund11 ай бұрын
Did he now? Or did Russia Today say he did?
@clementgoetke238511 ай бұрын
trump also said cant we fight covid with a bleach injection
@feonor2611 ай бұрын
Yeah I guess Trump claims to be an expert in marine engineering too, right? I mean he's a world champion in every subject know to man according to himself. Lets hire in Trump as a consultant on the next ship.
@monkeyboy842411 ай бұрын
NATO is so predictable. This will have Putin shaking in his boots - from laughter.
@TheMVCoho11 ай бұрын
Is Putin over in Oslo these days? Probably afraid of a peasant revolt in Moscow.
@TTTT-oc4eb11 ай бұрын
A Russian carrier group consist of one aircraft carrier and 10 tugboats.
@robertbraden445411 ай бұрын
@@TTTT-oc4eb ...and 4 fire brigades
@dnewbury5211 ай бұрын
More likely shitting in his pants.
@deang562211 ай бұрын
NATO can be as predictable as it likes. Russia has *NOTHING* even remotely close to this.
@flaggemusablopp434611 ай бұрын
veldig søt og vakker båt. Norge skulle hatt 2
@feonor2611 ай бұрын
Vi har ikke bruk for de. Vi har et forsvar som spesialiserer seg på andre områder.
@xXtuscanator22Xx3 ай бұрын
@@feonor26More like you’re allies with the US so it doesn’t matter since we’d come and fight if anybody decided to touch you guys
@feonor263 ай бұрын
@@xXtuscanator22Xx That is one thing, but also the carrier is a weapon for attack, not defense. Also our armed forces and population is not big enough. We have instead focused our forces to specialize in certain fields. Our Special Forces for example are one of the top tiers in the world.